Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gelis, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Steve Rudolph Gelis's motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning, concluding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained already so oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6381

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Steve Rudolph Gelis's motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning, concluding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained already so oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Gelis, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Steve Rudolph Gelis's motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning, concluding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained already so oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6381

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    STEVE RUDOLPH GELIS,
    Gellis,

    a/k/a Steve Randolph


    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CR-88-56-F)
    Submitted:

    February 12, 1998

    Decided:

    February 26, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Steve Rudolph Gelis, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his "All
    Writs Act 28 U.S.C. 1651, Motion in de Novo Pursuant to New Law
    and Evidence." We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gelis, No. CR-8856-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like