Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Victor Buencamino v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Victor Buencamino's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Buencamino, a federal pretrial detainee, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-07-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6839

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Victor Buencamino's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Buencamino, a federal pretrial detainee, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Victor Buencamino v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Victor Buencamino's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Buencamino, a federal pretrial detainee, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6839

    VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Butner FMC,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief
    District Judge. (5:15-hc-02027-D)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2015

    Decided: July 28, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Victor J. Buencamino, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Victor J. Buencamino, a federal pretrial detainee, appeals
    the district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241
    (2012)

    petition.

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed

    in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Buencamino v. United States, No. 5:15-hc-02027-D (E.D.N.C.

    May 19, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like