Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-2024
of
her
minor
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DEWAIN MACKEY, and Madison County Planning/Zoning Board, in
his official capacity as Vice-Chairman; MADISON COUNTY
PLANNING
BOARD;
MACKEY
FARMS;
MADISON
COUNTY
SCHOOL
DISTRICT; KATHY PARKER MACKEY, and Mackey Farm and Madison
County School District, in her individual and professional
capacities; KATHY RAY, in her individual capacity and in her
official capacity as Paralegal for the Twenty-Fourth
Prosecutorial District; GERALD WILSON, in his individual
capacity, and in his official capacity as Chief District
Attorney for the Twenty-Fourth Prosecutorial District;
ALEXANDER LYERLY, in his individual capacity, and in his
official as Chief District Court Judge for the Twenty-Fourth
Judicial District; SAMUEL E. PARKER, in his individual
capacity, and in his official capacity as Madison County
Magistrate; RONALD WILCOX, and the Madison County School
District,
in
his
individual
capacity,
and
in
his
professional capacity as Superintendent for Madison County
School District; ROBERT DAVIDSON, and Madison County Animal
Control, in his individual capacity, and in his official
capacity as former Director for Madison County Animal
Control; MADISON COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL; SAM LUNSFORD, and
Madison County Animal Control, in his individual capacity,
and in his official capacity as Director for Madison County
Animal Control; JAMES HARWOOD, and Madison County Sheriffs
Department, in his individual capacity, and in his official
capacity as Madison County Sheriff; MADISON COUNTY SHERIFFS
DEPARTMENT; GEORGE COLE, in his individual capacity, and in
his official capacity as (former) Detective for the Madison
County Sheriffs Department; JOHN LEDFORD, and Madison
County Sheriffs Department, in his individual capacity, and
in his official capacity as (former) Madison County Sheriff;
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00321-MR-DCK)
Submitted:
PER CURIAM:
Delta Walsh seeks to appeal the district courts order
adopting the magistrate judges recommendations and granting the
motions to dismiss certain Defendants with prejudice, denying
the motion to dismiss certain Defendants without prejudice, and
granting
Walsh
leave
to
file
second
amended
complaint
affirm
3, 2012).
before
the
reasons
stated
by
Accordingly,
the
district
court.
legal
for
We have
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED