Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Kareem Jamal Currence appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(e) motions. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Currence in forma pauperis status but found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7622

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kareem Jamal Currence appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(e) motions. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Currence in forma pauperis status but found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kareem Jamal Currence appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(e) motions. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Currence in forma pauperis status but found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7622

    KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    E.K. CAULEY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
    District Judge. (1:11-cv-00088)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2015

    Decided:

    March 2, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kareem

    Jamal

    Currence

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.


    59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in
    forma

    pauperis.

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave

    to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv-

    00088 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like