Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 INTRODUCTION
Portfolio management and investment decision as a concept
came to be familiar with the conclusion of second world war when thing can be in the
stock market can be liberally ruined the fortune of individual, companies ,even
government s it was then discovered that the investing in various scripts instead of
putting all the money in a single securities yielded
percentage, it goes to the credit of HARY MERKOWITZ, 1991 noble laurelled to have
pioneered the concept of combining high yielded securities with these low but steady
yielding securities to achieve optimum correlation coefficient of shares.
Portfolio management refers to the management of portfolios for others by
professional investment managers it refers to the management of an individual investors
portfolio by professionally qualified person ranging from merchant banker to specified
portfolio company.
Definition by SEBI
A portfolio management is the total holdings of securities belonging to any person.
Portfolio is a combination of securities that have returns and risk characteristics of their
own; port folio may not take on the aggregate characteristics of their individual parts.
Thus a portfolio is a combination of various assets and /or instruments of
investments. Combination may have different features of risk and return separate from
those of the components. The portfolio is also built up of the wealth or income of the
investor over a period of time with a view to suit is return or risk preference to that of the
portfolio that he holds. The portfolio analysis is thus an analysis is thus an analysis of risk
return characteristics of individual securities in the portfolio and changes that may take
place in combination with other securities due interaction among them and impact of
each on others. Security analysis is only a tool for efficient portfolio management; both of
them together and cannot be dissociated. Portfolios are combination of assets held by the
investors.
These combination may be various assets classed like equity and debt or of different
1
issues like Govt. bonds and corporate debts are of various instruments like discount
bonds, debentures and blue chip equity nor scripts of emerging Blue chip companies.
Portfolio analysis includes portfolio construction, selection of securities revision
of portfolio evaluation and monitoring of the performance of the portfolio. All these are
part of the portfolio management.
The traditional portfolio theory aims at the selection of such securities that would
fit in will with the asset preferences, needs and choices of the investors. Thus, retired
executive invests in fixed income securities for a regular and fixed return. A business
executive or a
The stock markets have become attractive investment options for the common
man. But the need is to be able to effectively and efficiently manage investments in order
to keep maximum returns with minimum risk.
Hence this study on portfolio management & investment decision to
examine the role process and merits of effective investment management and decision.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
To construct an effective portfolio which offers the maximum return for minimum risk.
1.4 SCOPE
1.5 METHODOLOGY
Primary source
Information gathered from interacting with various investors in the market how they
diversified their investments regards their Risks & Returns.
Secondary source
Daily prices of scripts from news papers and from the textbooks and other magazines
Websites.
1.6 LIMITATIONs
given the goals of the portfolio owner and changing economic conditions. Selection
involves deciding what assets to purchase, how many to purchase, when to purchase
them, and what assets to divest. These decisions always involve some sort of performance
measurement, most typically expected return on the portfolio, and the risk associated with
this return (i.e. the standard deviation of the return). Typically the expected returns from
portfolios, comprised of different asset bundles are compared.
The unique goals and circumstances of the investor must also be considered. Some
investors are more risk averse than others. Mutual funds have developed particular
techniques to optimize their portfolio holdings.
Thus, portfolio management is all about strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and
threats in the choice of debt vs. equity, domestic vs. international, growth vs. safety
and numerous other trade-offs encountered in the attempt to maximize return at a
given appetite for risk.
Aspects of Portfolio Management
Basically portfolio management involves
ELEMENTS
Portfolio Management is an on-going process involving the following basic tasks.
Strategies are to be developed and implemented in tune with invest policy formulated.
5
This will help the selection of asset classes and securities in each class depending upon
their risk-return attributes.
Finally, the evaluation of portfolio for the results to compare with the targets and needed
adjustments have to be made in the portfolio to the emerging conditions and to make up
for any shortfalls in achievements (targets).
4. SELECT INVESTMENTS
The customized portfolio is created using an allocation of select QFM Funds.
Each QFM Fund is designed to satisfy the requirements of a specific asset class, and
is selected in the necessary proportion to match the optimal investment mix.
5. MONITOR PROGRESS
Building an optimal investment mix is only part of the process. It is equally important
to maintain the optimal mix when varying market conditions cause investment mix to
drift away from its target. To ensure that mix of asset classes stays in line with
investors unique needs, the portfolio will be monitored and rebalanced back to the
optimal investment mix
6. REASSESS NEEDS AND GOALS
Just as markets shift, so do the goals and objectives of investors. With the flexibility
of the Portfolio Program and Asset Management Program, when the investors
9
needs or other life circumstances change, the portfolio has the flexibility to
accommodate such changes.
RISK
Risk refers to the probability that the return and therefore the value of an asset or security
may have alternative outcomes. Risk is the uncertainty (today) surrounding the eventual
outcome of an event which will occur in the future. Risk is uncertainty of the
income/capital appreciation or loss of both. All investments are risky. The higher the risk
taken, the higher is the return. But proper management of risk involves the right choice of
investments whose risks are compensation.
RETURN
Return-yield or return differs from the nature of instruments, maturity period and the
creditor or debtor nature of the instrument and a host of other factors. The most important
factor influencing return is risk return is measured by taking the price income plus the
price change.
PORTFOLIO RISK
Risk on portfolio is different from the risk on individual securities. This risk is reflected
by in the variability of the returns from zero to infinity. The expected return depends on
probability of the returns and their weighted contribution to the risk of the portfolio.
RETURN ON PORTFOLIO
Each security in a portfolio contributes returns in the proportion of its investment in
10
security. Thus the portfolio of expected returns, from each of the securities with weights
representing the proportionate share of security in the total investments.
11
TYPES OF RISKS
Risk consists of two components. They are
1.
Systematic Risk
2.
Un-systematic Risk
1.SYSTEMATIC RISK
Systematic risk refers to that portion of total variability in return caused by factors
affecting the prices of all securities. Economic, Political and sociological changes are
sources of systematic risk. Their effect is to cause prices of nearly all individual common
stocks and/or all individual bonds to move together in the same manner.
i.
Market Risk
Variability in return on most common stocks that are due to basic sweeping changes in
investor expectations is referred to as market risk. Market risk is caused by investor
reaction to tangible as well as intangible events.
ii.
Interest rate-Risk
Interest rate risk refers to the uncertainty of future market values and of the size of
future income, caused by fluctuations in the general level of interest rates.
12
iii.
Purchasing-Power Risk
Purchasing power risk is the uncertainty of the purchasing power of the amounts to be
received. In more events everyday terms, purchasing power risk refers to the impact of or
deflation on an investment.
3.UNSYSTEMATIC RISK
Unsystematic risk is the portion of total risk that is unique to a firm or industry.
Factors such as management capability, consumer preferences, and labor strikes Cause
systematic variability of return in a firm. Unsystematic factors are largely independent of
factors affecting securities markets in general. Because these factors affect one firm, they
must be examined for each firm.
Unsystematic risk that portion of risk that is unique or peculiar to a firm or an industry,
above and beyond that affecting securities markets in general. Factors such as
management capability, consumer preferences, and labor strikes can cause unsystematic
variability of return for a companys stock.
i.
Business Risk
Business risk is a function of the operating conditions faced by a firm and the variability
these conditions inject into operating income and expected dividends.
Business risk can be divided into two broad categories
a.
b.
b. External business risk is the result of operating conditions imposed on the firm by
circumstances beyond its control. The external environments in which it operates
exert some pressure on the firm. The external factors are social and regulatory factors,
monetary and fiscal policies of the government, business cycle and the general
economic environment within which a firm or an industry operates.
ii.
Financial Risk
Financial risk is associated with the way in which a company finances its activities.
Financial risk is avoided risk to the extent that management has the freedom to decide to
borrow or not to borrow funds. A firm with no debit financing has no financial risk
MARKOWITZ MODEL
Dr. Harry M. Markowitz is credited with developing the first modern portfolio analysis
model in order to arrange for the optimum allocation of assets with in portfolio. To reach
these objectives, Markowitz generated portfolio with in a reward risk context. In essence,
Markowitz model is a theoretical framework for the analysis of risk return choices.
Decisions are based on the concept of efficient portfolios.
Markowitz model is a theoretical framework for the analysis of risk, return choices
and this approach determines an efficient set of portfolio return through three important
variable that is,
Return
Standard Deviation
Coefficient of correlation
Markowitz model is also called as a Full Covariance Model. Through this model the
investor can find out the efficient set of portfolio by finding out the trade off between risk
14
and return, between the limits of zero and infinity. According to this theory, the effect of
one security purchase over the effects of the other security purchase is taken into
consideration and then the results are evaluated. Markowitz had given up the single stock
portfolio and introduced diversification. The single stock portfolio would be preferable if
the investor is perfectly certain that his expectation of highest return would turn out to be
real. In the world of uncertainty, most of the risk averse investors would like to join
Markowitz rather than keeping a single stock, because diversification reduces the risk.
A portfolio is efficient when it is expected to yield the highest return for the level of risk
accepted or, alternatively the smallest portfolio risk for a specified level of expected
return level chosen, and asset are substituted until the portfolio combination expected
returns, set of efficient portfolio is generated.
Assumptions
2.
15
Henry Markowitz has given the following formula for a two-security portfolio and three
security portfolios.
16
p =
The CAPM is a model for pricing an individual security (asset) or a portfolio. For
individual security perspective, the security market line (SML) is used and its relation to
expected return and systematic risk (beta) to show how the market must price individual
securities in relation to their security risk class. The SML enables us to calculate the
reward-to-risk ratio for any security in relation to that of the overall market. Therefore,
when the expected rate of return for any security is deflated by its beta coefficient, the
reward-to-risk ratio for any individual security in the market is equal to the market
reward-to-risk ratio, thus:
,
The Security Market Line, seen here in a graph, describes a relation between the beta and
the asset's expected rate of return
The market reward-to-risk ratio is effectively the market risk premium and by rearranging
the above equation and solving for E (Ri), we obtain the Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM).
Where:
is the expected return on the capital asset
(the beta coefficient) the sensitivity of the asset returns to market returns, or also
,
is the expected return of the market
difference between the expected market rate of return and the risk-free rate of return).
Beta measures the volatility of the security, relative to the asset class. The equation is
saying that investors require higher levels of expected returns to compensate them for
higher expected risk. We can think of the formula as predicting a security's behavior as a
function of beta:
CAPM says that if we know a security's beta then we know the value of r that
investors expect it to have.
Assumptions of CAPM
The model assumes that asset returns are (jointly) normally distributed random variables.
It is however frequently observed that returns in equity and other markets are not
normally distributed.
The model assumes that the variance of returns is an adequate measurement of risk.
The model does not appear to adequately explain the variation in stock returns.
The model assumes that given a certain expected return investors will prefer lower risk
(lower variance) to higher risk and conversely given a certain level of risk will prefer
assumption)
The model assumes that there are no taxes or transaction costs.
19
The market portfolio consists of all assets in all markets, where each asset is weighted by
its market capitalization. This assumes no preference between markets and assets for
individual investors, and that investors choose assets solely as a function of their riskreturn profile. It also assumes that all assets are infinitely divisible as to the amount
20
The optimal portfolios plotted along the curve have the highest expected return
possible for the given amount of risk.
Because the unsystemic risk is diversifiable, the total risk of a portfolio can be viewed as
beta.
21
Note 1: The expected market rate of return is usually measured by looking at the
arithmetic average of the historical returns on a market portfolio.
Note 2: The risk free rate of return used for determining the risk premium is usually
the arithmetic average of historical risk free rates of return and not the current risk
free rate of return.
Measuring the Expected Return and Standard Deviation of a Portfolio
The expected return on a portfolio is the weighted average of the returns of individual
assets, where each asset's weight is determined by its weight in the portfolio.
The formula is:
E (Rp) = [WaX E (Ra)] + [WaX E (Ra)]
Where
E= is stands for expected
Rp= Return on the portfolio
Wa= Weight of asset n where n my stand for asset a, betc.
22
The portfolio standard deviation ( p) measure the risk associated with the expected return
of the portfolio.
The formula is p = wa2 2 + wa2 2 + 2wawbrab a b
The term rab represents the correlation between the returns of investments a and b. The
correlation coefficient, r, will always reduce the portfolio standard deviation as long as it
is less than +1.00.
Portfolio diversification
Diversification
occurs
when
different
assets
make
up
portfolio.
The benefit of diversification is risk reduction; the extent of this benefit depends upon
how the returns of various assets behave over time. The market rewards diversification.
We can lower risk without sacrificing expected return, and/or we can increase expected
return without having to assume more risk. Diversifying among different kinds of assets
is called asset allocation.
The diversification can either be vertical or horizontal.
In vertical diversification a portfolio can have scripts of different companies within the
same industry. In horizontal diversification one can have different scripts chosen from
different industries.
An important way to reduce the risk of investing is to diversify your investments.
Diversification is akin to "not putting all your eggs in one basket."
For example: If portfolio only consisted of stocks of technology companies, it would
likely face a substantial loss in value if a major event adversely affected the technology
industry.
23
There are different ways to diversify a portfolio whose holdings are concentrated in one
industry. We can invest in the stocks of companies belonging to other industry groups.
We can allocate our portfolio among different categories of stocks, such as growth, value,
or income stocks. We can include bonds and cash investments in our asset-allocation
decisions. We can also diversify by investing in foreign stocks and bonds.
Diversification requires us to invest in securities whose investment returns do not
move together. In other words, the investment returns have a low correlation. The
correlation coefficient is used to measure the degree to which returns of two securities are
related. As we increase the number of securities in our portfolio, we reach a point where
likely diversified as much as reasonably possible. Diversification should neither be too
much or too less. It should be adequate according to the size of the portfolio.
The graph on the shows how volatility increases the risk of loss of principal, and how this
risk worsens as the time horizon shrinks. So all other things being equal, volatility is
24
The second important property of the efficient frontier is that it's curved, not straight.
If we take a 50/50 allocation between two securities, assuming that the year-to-year
performance of these two securities is not perfectly in sync -- that is, assuming that the
great years and the lousy years for Security 1 don't correspond perfectly to the great years
and lousy years for Security 2, but that their cycles are at least a little off -- then the
25
standard deviation of the 50/50 allocation will be less than the average of the standard
deviations of the two securities separately. Graphically, this stretches the possible
allocations to the left of the straight line joining the two securities
The yield provided by an investment in a portfolio of assets will be closer to the Mean
b.
c.
d.
underlying assets.
If the yields are dependent - the portfolio's variance will be equal to or less than the
lowest
Market portfolio
The efficient frontier is a collection of portfolios, each one optimal for a given
amount of risk. A quantity known as the Sharpe ratio represents a measure of the amount
of additional return (above the risk-free rate) a portfolio provides compared to the risk it
carries. The portfolio on the efficient frontier with the highest Sharpe Ratio is known as
the market portfolio, or sometimes the super-efficient portfolio.
This portfolio has the property that any combination of it and the risk-free asset
will produce a return that is above the efficient frontier - offering a larger return for a
given amount of risk than a portfolio of risky assets on the frontier would.
26
A Portfolio manager evaluates his portfolio performance and identifies the sources of
strengths and weakness. The evaluation of the portfolio provides a feed back about the
performance to evolve better management strategy. Even though evaluation of portfolio
performance is considered to be the last stage of investment process, it is a continuous
process. There are number of situations in which an evaluation becomes necessary and
important.
Evaluation has to take into account:
Sharpes ratio
Treynors ratio
Jensens alpha
Sharpes ratio
27
The Sharpe ratio tells us whether the returns of a portfolio are due to smart investment
decisions or a result of excess risk. This measurement is very useful because although one
portfolio or fund can reap higher returns than its peers, it is only a good investment if
those higher returns do not come with too much additional risk. The greater a portfolio's
Sharpe ratio, the better its risk-adjusted performance has been.
Treynors ratio
The Treynor ratio is a measurement of the returns earned in excess of that which could
have been earned on a risk less investment.
The Treynor ratio is also called reward-to-volatility ratio. It relates excess return over the
risk-free rate to the additional risk taken; however systematic risk instead of total risk is
used. The higher the Treynor ratio, the better is the performance under analysis.
Treynors ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio - Average Return of the Risk-Free
Rate) / Beta of the Portfolio
Like the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio (T) does not quantify the value added, if any, of
active portfolio management. It is a ranking criterion only. A ranking of portfolios based
on the Treynor Ratio is only useful if the portfolios under consideration are sub-portfolios
28
of a broader, fully diversified portfolio. If this is not the case, portfolios with identical
systematic risk, but different total risk, will be rated the same.
Jensens alpha
An alternative method of ranking portfolio management is Jensen's alpha, which
quantifies the added return as the excess return above the security market line in the
capital asset pricing model. Jensen's alpha (or Jensen's Performance Index) is used to
determine the excess return of a stock, other security, or portfolio over the security's
required rate of return as determined by the Capital Asset Pricing Model. This model is
used to adjust for the level of beta risk, so that riskier securities are expected to have
higher returns. The measure was first used in the evaluation of mutual fund managers by
Michael Jensen in the 1970's.
To calculate alpha, the following inputs are needed:
The realized return (on the portfolio),
29
In India, portfolio management is still in its infancy. Barring a few Indian banks, and
foreign banks and UTI, no other agency had professional portfolio managementuntil1987.
After the setting up of public sector Mutual Funds, since 1987, professional portfolio
management, backed by competent research staff became the order of the day. After the
success of mutual funds in portfolio management, a number of brokers and investment
consultants some of whom are also professionally qualified have become portfolio
managers. They have managed the funds of clients on both discretionary and nondiscretionary basis.
The recent CBI probe into the operations of many market dealers has revealed the
unscrupulous practices by banks, dealers and brokers in their portfolio operations. The
SEBI has then imposed stricter rules, which included their registration, a code of conduct
and minimum infrastructure, experience and expertise etc.
The guidelines of SEBI are in the direction of making portfolio management a
responsible professional service to be rendered by experts in the field.
PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS
Portfolio analysis includes portfolio construction, selection of
securities, revision of portfolio evaluation and monitoring the performance of the
portfolio. All these are part of subject of portfolio management which is a dynamic
concept. Individual securities have risk-return characteristics of their own. Portfolios,
which are combinations of securities may or may not take on the aggregate characteristics
of their individuals parts.
Portfolio analysis considers the determination of future risk and return in holding
various blends of individual securities. As we know that expected return from individual
securities carries some degree of risk. Various groups of securities when held together
behave in a different manner and give interest payments and dividends also, which are
different to the analysis of individual securities. A combination of securities held together
will give a beneficial result if they are grouped in a manner to secure higher return after
taking into consideration the risk element.
There are two approaches in construction of the portfolio of securities. They are
30
Traditional approach
Modern approach
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Traditional approach was based on the fact that risk could be measured on each
individual security through the process of finding out the standard deviation and that
security should be chosen where the deviation was the lowest. Traditional approach
believes that the market is inefficient and the fundamental analyst can take advantage
for the situation. Traditional approach is a comprehensive financial plan for the
individual. It takes into account the individual needs such as housing, life insurance
and pension plans.
Traditional approach basically deals with two major decisions. They are
a.
b.
DATA ANALYSIS
31
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
141.45
297.90
375.00
587.70
892.00
295.45
371.35
585.05
891.5
1238.7
7.50
7.50
8.50
8.50
10.00
Table 4.1
= 114.17%
141.45
Return (2013) = 7.50+(371.35-297.90)
* 100
= 27.17%
297.90
Return (2014) = 8.50+(585.05-375)
* 100
= 58.28%
375
* 100
= 53.13%
= 39.98%
* 100
892
Calculation of return of HDFC
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Beginning
Ending price
Dividend
Price
358.5
645.9
771
1195
1630
645.55
769.05
1207
1626.9
2877.75
3
3.50
4.50
5.50
7.00
Table 4.2
Return
Return (2012)
3+(645.55-358.5)
* 100
= 80.9%
358.5
Return (2013)
= 19.60%
645.9
Return (2014)
33
4.50+(1207-771)
* 100
= 57.13%
771
Return (2015)
5.00+(1626.9-1195)
* 100
= 36.6%
1195.9
Return (2016)
7.00+(2877.75-1630)
* 100
76.97%
1630
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
667
990
1318.95
142
176.5
983.5
1310.75
142.1
176.1
209.45
15
20
31.80
2.65
3.10
Table 4.3
Return
34
Return(2012)
15 + (983.5-667) * 100
49.7%
667
Return(2013) =
20+ (1310.75-990) *
100
= 34.4%
990
Return(2014)
31+ (142.1-1318.95)*100 =
86.87%
1318.95
Return(2015)
= 25.8%
142
Return(2016)
3.10+(209.45-176.5) *100 =
20.45
176.5
Beginning
price(Rs)
2012
2013
2014
35
133.65
161.5
179.2
159.7
179.1
269.15
6.75
6.75
7.25
2015
2016
270.5
390.9
388.45
382.1
6.00
11.25
Table 4.4
Return
Return(2012)
6.75+(159.7-133.65) * 100
= 24.5%
133.65
Return(2013) =
6.75+ (179.1-161.5) *
100
= 13.58
161.5
Return(2014)
7.25+(269.15-179.2) * 100
= 54.2
179.2
Return(2015)
6.00+(388.45-270.5) * 100
= 45.8
11.25+(382.1-390.9) * 100
= 0.62
270.5
Return(2016)
390.9
Calculation of return of CIPLA
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
2012
36
898.00
1371.05
10.00
2013
2014
2015
2016
1334.00
320.00
447.95
251.5
317.8
448
251.35
212.65
3.00
3.50
2.00
2.00
Table 4.5
Return
Return(2012)
10.00+(1375.05-898.00) * 100 =
54.23%
898.00
Return(2013)
3.00+(317.8-1334.00)
* 100
-75.95%
41.09%
1334
Return(2014)
3.50+(448-320.00)
* 100
320
Return(2015)
2.00+(251.35-447.95)
* 100
-43.44%
-14.65%
447.95
Return(2016)
2.00+(212.65-251.5)
* 100
251.5
Calculation of return of RANBAXY
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
37
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
598.45
1109.00
1268
363
391
1095.25
1251.15
362.75
391.8
425.5
15.00
17.00
14.50
8.50
8.50
Table 4.6
Return
Return(2012)
15.00+(1095.25-598.45) * 100
85.52%
14.35%
-70.24%
10.27%
10.99%
598..45
Return(2013)
17.00+(1251.15-1109.00)
* 100
1109
Return(2014) =
14.50+(362.75-1268.00)
* 100
1268.00
Return(2015) =
8.50+(391.8-363)
* 100
363
Return(2016) =
8.50+(425.5-391.00)
391.00
38
* 100
Year
Return (R)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
114.7
27.17
58.28
53.13
39.98
293.26
R-R
58.652
58.652
58.652
58.652
58.652
56.048
-31.482
-0.372
-5.522
-18.672
Table 4.7
_
Average (R) =
= 293.26 = 58.65
_
Variance =
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Standard Deviation =
Variance
1
4
39
34.846
(11905.379)
_
( R-R )2
3486.6
991.11
0.138384
30.492
348.64
4856.98
Year
Return (R)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
80.9
19.60
57.13
36.6
76.97
271.2
R-R
( R-R )2
54.24
54.24
54.24
54.24
54.24
26.66
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
710.75
1199.92
8.3521
311.16
516.65
2476.8
Table 4.8
_
Average (R) = R = 271.2 = 54.24
N
_
Variance =
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Standard Deviation =
40
Variance
(2476.8)
5-1
24.88
Return (R)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
49.7
34.4
-86.87
25.8
20.4
43.43
R-R
8.686
8.686
8.686
8.686
8.686
41.04
25.714
-95.556
17.114
11.714
Table 4.9
_
Average (R) = R
N
41
43.43
5
= 8.686
_
( R-R )2
1682.14
661.209
9130.94
293.88
137.21
11905.379
_
Variance =
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Standard Deviation
Variance
(11905.379)
5-1
S.D
54.55
Year
Return (R)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
24.5
13.58
54.2
45.8
0.62
138.7
42
R-R
( R-R )2
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
-3.24
-14.16
26.46
18.06
-27.12
10.5
200.5
700.13
326.16
735.5
1972.79
Table 4.10
__
Average R =
R
N
138.7 = 27.74
5
_
variance
(R-R )2
1
n-1
Standard Deviation
Variance
1 (1972.79)
=
22.2
R-R
_
( R-R )2
Year
Return (R)
2012
54.23
-7.744
61.974
3840
2013
-75.95
-7.744
-68.206
4652
2014
41.09
-7.744
48.834
2384
43
2015
-43.44
-7.744
-35.696
1274
2016
-14.65
-7.744
-6.906
47.692
-38.72
12197.692
Table 4.11
_
Average (R) = R
-38.72 = -7.744
5
_
Variance
= 1/n-1 (R-R)2
Standard Deviation =
Variance
1 (12197.692)
4
=
55.22
Return (R)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
85.52
14.35
-70.24
10.27
10.99
50.89
Table 4.12
_
44
R-R
( R-R )2
75.34
4.17
-80.42
0.09
0.81
5676
17.39
6467
0.0081
0.6561
12161
10.18
10.18
10.18
10.18
10.18
Average (R) = R
= 50.89 = 10.18
N
_
Variance
= 1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Standard Deviation
Variance
(12161)
55.13
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
45
DEVIATION OF ICICI
___
__
RA-RA
RB-RB
26.66
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
56.048
-31.482
-0.372
-5.522
-18.672
COMBINED DEVIATION
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
1494.24
1090.5
-1.075
97.41
-424.4
2256.675
Table 4.13
__
__
451.335
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
451.335
(24.88) (34.846)
46
0.5206
DEVIATIONOF ITC
Year
PALMOLIVE
RA-RA
__
41.04
25.714
-95.556
17.114
11.714
RB-RB
-3.24
-14.16
26.46
18.06
-27.12
__
-132.97
-364.1
-2528.4
309.07
-317.68
-3034.08
__
Co-variance(COVAB )
= 1/5 (-3034.08)
= -606.816
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
Table 4.14
47
COMBINED DEVIATION
COLGATE___
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
DEVIATION OF
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
= -
606.816
(54.55) (22.21)
= - 0.5008
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
DEVIATION 0F
DEVIATION OF
CIPLA
RANBAXI
___
__
RA-RA
61.974
-68.206
48.834
-35.696
-6.906
RB-RB
75.34
4.17
-80.42
0.09
0.81
___
48
__
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
4669.12
-284.42
-3927.23
-3.213
-5.59
448.667
Table 4.15
n
COMBINED DEVIATION
__
Co-variance (COVAB )
Co-variance(COVAB )
= 1/5 (448.667)
= 89.7334
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
89.7334
(55.22)(55.13)
= 0.0295
Correlation between CIPLA& HDFC
DEVIATION OF
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Table 4.16
49
DEVIATION OF HDFC
COMBINED DEVIATION
CIPLA
___
__
RA-RA
61.974
-68.206
48.834
-35.696
-6.906
RB-RB
26.06
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
1615.04
2362.66
141.13
629.68
-156.97
4591.54
n
Co-variance (COVAB )
__
Co-variance(COVAB )
= 1/5 (4591.54)
=
918.31
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
918.31
(55.22) (24.88)
0.668
STANDARD DEVIATION
COMPANY
50
__
STANDARED DEVIATION
ITC
COLEGATE-
54.55
22.21
PALMOLIVE
HDFC
ICICI
RANBAXY
CIPLA
Table 4.17
24.88
34.846
55.13
55.22
.
Graph 4.1
AVERAGE
51
COMPANY
AVERAGE
ITC
COLGATE&PALMOLIVE
HDFC
ICICI
RANBAXY
CIPLA
8.686
27.74
54.24
58.652
10.18
-7.744
Table 4.18
Table 4.19
52
COMPANY
HDFC&ICICI
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXY
CIPLA&HDFC
0.5206
0.5008
0.0295
0.668
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
HDFC&ICICI
Formula
Xa
Xb
= 1Xa
Where X a
Xb
= ICICI
Std.a
= 24.88
Std.b
p ab
= 0.5206
Xa
53
HDFC
34.85
(24.88) 2 + (34.85)
Xb
= 1Xa
Xa
= 0.8199
Xb
0.1801
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
ITC&COLGATE
Formula:
Xa
Xb
1Xa
Where X a
ITC
COLGATE
Std.a
54.55
54
Xb
Std.b
22.21
p ab
0.5008
Xa
Xb
1Xa
Xa
= 0.0503
Xb
0.9497
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
CIPLA&RANBAXY
Formula
Xa
55
Xb
1Xa
Where X a
Xb
CIPLA
RANBAXY
Std.a
55.22
Std.b
55.13
p ab
= 0.0295
Xa =
(55.22) 2 + (55.13)
Xb = 1Xa
Xa
0.49916
Xb
= 0.50084
Two Portfolios
Correlation
COMPANY Xa
COMPANY Xb
Coefficient
PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLO
RETURN Rp
RISK
p
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
56
0.5206
0.5008
0.605
0.8199
0.0563
0.49916
..0.1801
0.9497
0.50084
114.24
26.835
1.2335
31.14
22.77
49.43
Table 4.20
__
PORTFOLIO RETURN
PORTFOLIO RISK=
__
___________________________________
p = X1^21^2+X2^22^2+2(X1)(X2)(X12)12
Portfolio return Rp
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
57
114.24
26.835
1.234
Table 4.21
.
Graph 4.3
Portfolio risk
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
Table 4.22
58
31.14
22.77
49.43
Graph 4.4
FINDINGS
As the study shows the following findings for portfolio construction
Investor would be able to achieve when the returns of shares and debentures
Investors may invest their money for long run as the both combinations are most suitable
portfolios.
A rational investor would constantly examine his chosen portfolio both for average
return and risk.
CONCLUSION
60
ICICI&HDFC
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in HDFC when
compared to ICICI as the risk involved in HDFC is less than ICICI as the
standard deviation of HDFC is less than that of ICICI.
The combination of ITC and COLGATE gives the proportion of investment is 0.0563
and 0.50084 for ITC and COLGATE, based on the standard deviations The standard
deviation for ITC is 54.55 and for COLGATE is 22.2.
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in COLGATE when compared to ITC
as the risk involved in COLGATE is less than ITC as the standard deviation of
61
CIPLA&RANBAXY
to
both the risk is almost same, hence the risk is same when invested in either of the
security.
SUGGESTIONS
Buy stock with a disparity and discrepancy between the situation of the firm and the
The investor must select the right advisory body which is has sound knowledge about the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1.
2.
V.K.BHALLA
63
Website
4.WWW. Investopedia.com
5.www.nseindia.com
6.www.bseindia.com.
Newspapers& magazine
7. DAILY NEWS PAPERS.ECONOMIC TIMES, FINANCIAL EXPRESS
64