KORANKYE ANTO YAW,

CHARLOTTE_CHAD_PROJECT
MANAGEMENT FOR I.T.
by Yaw A. Korankye

WORD COUNT
CHARACTER COUNT

4656
26177

TIME SUBMITTED
PAPER ID

24-JAN-2013 10:52AM
21312941

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS

FINAL GRADE

61

/ 100

The assignment covered the main areas as specified and showed an understanding of the
principles of project management.
The case study was relevant to use and highlighted both benefits and drawbacks of the project.
It was encouraging to read that the organisation had already addressed some issues however
others that would seem easy to solve were ignored. Using an appropriate methodology to
structure the project would have advocated and certainly then for instance communication
channels could then be identified.
The analysis within this assignment was good. You logically addressed each stage and there
was some evaluation involved. This latter skill was however lacking in depth and detail. The
conclusions should have brought the information together and provided more structured
alternatives to ensure the issues were addressed.
The referencing within the assignment was presented to an acceptable standard. Wikipedia
should not be used though as it is not deemed a reliable source. The general presentation was
clear and relevant terminology was used.
Overall the assessment criteria has been achieved.
aw13.02.13

PAGE 1
PAGE 2

1. no don't reference this.

PAGE 3
PAGE 4

2. background.
PAGE 5

3. how and who?

PAGE 6

4. this is too descriptive.

PAGE 7

5. descriptive again.
PAGE 8

6. too brief.
PAGE 9

7 . is this applied to the organisation?

PAGE 10

8. some issues discussed.

PAGE 11

9. ok fine.
10. yes fine.
PAGE 12

11. ok good example.

PAGE 13

12. ok fine.

13. so what should have been done?

14. ok fine good point.
PAGE 14

15. alright is there any evidence to support this?

PAGE 15

16. too brief needed expanding.

PAGE 16

17 . please do not use.

PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22

RUBRIC: AGC FORM FOR ASSIGNMENTS

PRESENTATION
Presentation of assignment and clarity of expression
Presentation shows a polished, coherent structure. Thoughts and ideas are clearly expressed. Fluent
academic writing style.
Presentation carefully and logically organised. Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed.
Presentation satisfactory showing organisation and coherence. Language mainly fluent.
Presentation shows an attempt to organise in a logical manner. Meaning apparent, but language not
always fluent.
Presentation is disorganised. Purpose and meaning of assignment is unclear and/or is poorly expressed.
PURPOSE
Attention to the purpose of the assignment
Has addressed the purpose of the assignment comprehensively and imaginatively.
Has addressed the purpose of the assignment coherently and with some attempt to demonstrate
imagination.
Has address the purpose of the assignment.
Some of the answer responds to the purpose of the question.
Answer fails to address the question set.
ANALYSIS
Critical analysis of literature/theory
The assignment demonstrates application of critical analysis. Arguments are well integrated.
Clear application of theory through critical analysis of the topic area.
Demonstrates some critical analysis of relevant theory.
Limited evidence of critical analysis. Tendency towards description.
Lacks critical analysis of theory. Purely descriptive.
EVIDENCE
Illustrations: Use of examples/evidence.
Appropriate examples are fully and reliably integrated and evaluated.
Some use of examples. Well integrated and evaluated.
Some use of examples. Some integration and evaluation attempted.
A little use of examples. Little integration and evaluation.
Very little use of examples. No evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS
Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature showing reflection upon key
issues.
Good understanding shown in summary of arguments based in theory/literature.

Some evidence of the conclusion being supported by theory/literature.

Limited conclusions only partially grounded n theory/literature.
None or unsubstantiated conclusions.