Sarah Fisher reflects on Project 2, a website about how the addition of the 26th Amendment changed political rhetoric. She learned the importance of organization in website design by determining headings and text placement. Her research approach changed as she started with a question rather than a predetermined argument, considering both sides of the issue. Through this project, her view of rhetoric is displayed through the communication of politicians, which has changed with the expansion of the voting population. She pushed herself to learn something new, using 14 sources to develop an in-depth understanding of ageism in politics.
Sarah Fisher reflects on Project 2, a website about how the addition of the 26th Amendment changed political rhetoric. She learned the importance of organization in website design by determining headings and text placement. Her research approach changed as she started with a question rather than a predetermined argument, considering both sides of the issue. Through this project, her view of rhetoric is displayed through the communication of politicians, which has changed with the expansion of the voting population. She pushed herself to learn something new, using 14 sources to develop an in-depth understanding of ageism in politics.
Sarah Fisher reflects on Project 2, a website about how the addition of the 26th Amendment changed political rhetoric. She learned the importance of organization in website design by determining headings and text placement. Her research approach changed as she started with a question rather than a predetermined argument, considering both sides of the issue. Through this project, her view of rhetoric is displayed through the communication of politicians, which has changed with the expansion of the voting population. She pushed herself to learn something new, using 14 sources to develop an in-depth understanding of ageism in politics.
1.This project was different than the first because it made me work on organization. Because this project was a website, had to think about heading and text placement. I had to decide what tab each piece of information should go under. This kind of decision making strengthened my writing organization ability. 2. I approached my research with a question. I wanted to know how the addition of the 26th Amendment changed the political rhetoric used by politicians. Instead of researching a statement or argument, I started with nothing. If I was doing this a year ago I would have just decided 3-5 ways that the 26th Amendment changed the political sphere. Instead, I started with research. 3. My opinion of research has changed because I definitely believe research should start before you decide your argument. Just looking for sources that say what you want them too isnt a true research project. You have to consider both sides. 4. My project displays my view of rhetoric through communication. Politicians use rhetoric in their communication for speeches, debates, and campaigns. This communication has changed with the expansion of the United States voting age population. 5. This project started off very different than the last because I spent hours at the library trying to figure out what I was doing. For the last project I didnt use many sources. However, for this project I really tried to push myself and learn something I didnt already know. I checked out 14 books on ageism in politics, I scoured the indexes, and Im proud to say I was able to compose this project with a much more in depth understanding about the topic.