Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecht PDF
Lecht PDF
Engineers Responsibility
for Detailing Reinforced
Concrete Structures
Neal S. Anderson, PE, SE, FACI
Vice President of Engineering
Dilbert !!
6/11/2008
Bridge
Drawings /
Specs
Structural
Placing
Drawings
Placing
Drawings
5
6/11/2008
Buildings
Building Deliverables
Drawings
Structural
Architectural
Project Specifications
Section 03200 - Reinforcing
General Notes
8
6/11/2008
10
Building Drawings
Beams / girders
Columns
Walls
Foundations
Plans, sections, & details
12
6/11/2008
Building Drawings
Many elements are shown TYPICAL
Beam / g
girder table
Column schedule
13
Typical Colu
umn Details
14
15
6/11/2008
Building Drawings
Structural (& arch) drawings
Many typical details
Schedules, tables
Bar size & spacing (#5 @ 12 o.c.)
Detailers role
Placing plans development
Bill of material for fabrication
16
Bridges
17
Bridge Deliverables
Drawings
Structural rebar placing
Rebar schedules
Civil
6/11/2008
B C
Bar ID (unique)
Quantity (or #)
Rebar size
Total length
(including
bends)
E. Depiction of
shape
L-bars
Straight with
180 hook
Bar ID from
schedule
20
21
6/11/2008
Plans splices
Bridge deck plan
Splice
locations &
length
Contact lap
splice length
22
Bridge Drawings
Structural & placing drawings
Very prescriptive by DOT
a(E) & b(E) bars ~ deck
h(E) & v(E) bars ~ wall
Detailers role
Check engineers layout
Bill of materials
23
Bridges - Public
Bidding package
Bidding package
Lump sum
Unit prices
Itemized
Rebar
Weight ~ plain & (E)
Placing unit
6/11/2008
25
Detailing Responsibilities
Admittedly, this is more focused
on the building side
What are the issues / concerns?
Why worry?
Costs
Project delays
Structural issues
26
Responsible for
Placing plans development
Bill of material for fabrication
6/11/2008
Meet Mr. SE . . .
Structural Engineer
BSCE, MSCE, or PhD
FE (EIT), PE, or SE
Responsible for
Design of concrete
Preparing design plans &
specifications
Placing / shop drawing review
Anything else to ensure our
designs get built properly
SE Point of View . . . .
What are the perceived normal
relationships between SE and
detailer?
How can this relationship be
improved?
How do we solve the problems?
Who takes the lead to avoid
problems?
29
SE Relationship Perception
Detailer prepares placing drawings
SE and architectural drawings
CRSI Manual of Standard Practice
SE expectations:
Detailer to be properly trained or
Working under the supervision of an
experienced detailer
30
10
6/11/2008
SE Relationship Perception
SE expects interpretation questions
during the preparation stage & prior
to reviewing placing drawings
SE will provide quick response to
questions
SE Relationship Perception
SE will not transmit design
changes during the placing
drawing preparation
During mark-ups
Part 1
11
6/11/2008
34
35
Slabs
Walls
Footings
Bridges
Etc.
36
12
6/11/2008
37
38
Typical Stirrups
39
13
6/11/2008
40
41
42
14
6/11/2008
43
Continuous Beam
44
15
6/11/2008
Slab Folds
46
47
48
16
6/11/2008
Problem Resolution
Identify issues ASAP & communicate
to all parties
Share possible solutions
Document,
Document but do not point fingers
Implement best solution ASAP
Keeps job moving
17
6/11/2008
Meetings !!
If needed, call early project meeting
Detailer, Subs, & GC
Discuss project misunderstandings
Stretch Time . . . .
54
18
6/11/2008
Part 2
Nominal Weight,
lb/ft
[Nominal Mass,
kg/m ]
Diameter, in.
[ mm ]
Cross
Sectional
Area, in.2
[mm2]
3 [10]
0.376 [0.560]
0.375 [9.5]
0.11 [71]
4 [13]
0.668 [0.994]
0.500 [12.7]
0.20 [129]
5 [16]
1 043 [1
1.043
[1.552]
552]
0 625 [15
0.625
[15.9]
9]
0 31 [199]
0.31
6 [19]
1.502 [2.235]
0.750 [19.1]
0.44 [284]
7 [22]
2.044 [3.042]
0.875 [22.2]
0.60 [387]
8 [25]
2.670 [3.973]
1.000 [25.4]
0.79 [510]
9 [29]
3.400 [5.060]
1.128 [28.7]
1.00 [645]
10 [32]
4.303 [6.404]
1.270 [32.3]
1.27 [819]
11 [36]
5.313 [7.907]
1.410 [35.8]
1.56 [1006]
14 [43]
7.650 [11.38]
1.693 [43.0]
2.25 [1452]
18 [57]
13.60 [20.24]
2.257 [57.3]
4.00 [2581]
Diameter
approx.
Based on
weight
57
19
6/11/2008
Nominal
Diameter
( in. )
Outside
Diameter
( in. )
3/8
1/2
7/16
9/16
5/8
11/16
3/4
7/8
7/8
1-1/8
1.128
1-1/4
10
1 270
1-7/16
11
1.410
1-5/8
14
1 693
1-7/8
18
2 257
2-1/2
58
Avoid Congestion
59
Beam-Column Joints
60
20
6/11/2008
Beam-Column Joints
Perimeter of
Column Reinf.
Think curtains or
planes of steel
reinforcing
61
Beam-Column Joints
Congestion is a given
Consider making beams wider
By 4 in , 2 in each side
Corner beam bars dont interfere
Consider beams
Different depths or elevations
Top & bottom bar interferences
62
Beam-Column Joint
63
21
6/11/2008
Column Brackets
Where located on
column?
What is the size?
Bar spacing?
How does this
effect the strutand-tie model?
64
Easier for
contractor
66
22
6/11/2008
Performs
better
67
Coupling Beams
68
69
23
Final Con
nfiguration
6/11/2008
70
71
72
24
6/11/2008
73
74
75
25
6/11/2008
76
77
26
6/11/2008
27
6/11/2008
Manufacturers literature
82
Stagger
gg couplers
p
Can they be installed?
Grouting
Set screws
83
84
28
6/11/2008
Questions?
86
29