Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(30 31) Heat Exchanger Part 2 PDF
(30 31) Heat Exchanger Part 2 PDF
Prabal Talukdar
Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
IIT Delhi
E-mail: prabal@mech.iitd.ac.in
p
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Calculate Tlm
and F if neccessary
Obtain U
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Calculate As
Alternative of LMTD
A second kind of problem encountered in heat exchanger analysis is the
determination of the heat transfer rate and the outlet temperatures of the
hot and cold fluids for prescribed fluid mass flow rates and inlet temperatures
when the type and size of the heat exchanger are specified.
specified
The heat transfer surface area A of the heat exchanger in this case is known,
but the outlet temperatures
p
are not. Here the task is to determine the heat
transfer performance of a specified heat exchanger or to determine if a heat
exchanger available in storage will do the job.
The LMTD method could still be used for this alternative problem, but the
procedure would require tedious iterations, and thus it is not practical. In an
attempt to eliminate the iterations from the solution of such problems, Kays
andd L
London
d came up with
i h a method
h d in
i 1955 called
ll d the
h effectivenessNTU
ff ti
NTU
method, which greatly simplified heat exchanger analysis
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Effectiveness-NTU
Effectiveness
NTU method
Effectiveness
Q
Q max
Q = Cc (Tc,outt Tc,in
i ) = C h (Th ,in
i Th , outt )
Maximum temperature difference that can occurs
Tmax = Th ,in
i Tc,in
i
Example
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
ExampleC
Contd.
d
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Example
-Contd.
C td
Effectiveness relation
parallel-flow double-pipe heat exchanger
.
C
T h , out = Th ,in c (Tc,out Tc,in )
Ch
1
1
= UA s
+
ln
&
& c C pc
Th ,in Tc,in
m h C ph m
Th ,out Tc,out
ln
Th ,out Tc,out
Th ,in Tc,in
UA s Cc
1 +
Cc C h
C
Th ,in Tc,in + Tc,in Tc,out c (Tc,out Tc,in )
UA s Cc
Ch
1 +
ln
=
Th ,in Tc,in
Cc C h
simplifies to
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
C
ln 1 1 + c
C h
1 +
Cc C h
Th ,in Tc,in
Effectiveness relation
We now manipulate the definition of effectiveness to obtain
Q max
= min
C min (Th ,in Tc,in )
Th ,in Tc,in
Cc
1 exp
C min C max
pparallel _ flow =
C i
1+ min
C max
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
C
ln 1 1 + c
C h
Tc,out Tc,in
UA s Cc
1 +
=
Cc C h
Th ,in Tc,in
results
UA s Cc
1 +
1 exp
Cc C h
parallel _ flow =
C min Cc
1 +
Cc C h
NTU
UAs
=
C min
NTU =
Capacity ratio
C min
c=
C max
NotethatNTUisproportionaltoA
Note
that NTU is proportional to As .
Therefore,forspecifiedvaluesofUand
Cmin,thevalueofNTUisameasureof
theheattransfersurfaceareaAs .Thus,
thelargertheNTU,thelargertheheat
exchanger.
(m C p ) min
UA s C min
1 +
1 exp
C min C max
parallel _ flow =
C
1 + min
C max
UAs
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Discussions
1. The value of the effectiveness ranges from 0 to 1.
It increases rapidly with NTU for small values (up
to about NTU 1.5) but rather slowly for larger
values. Therefore, the use of a heat exchanger with
a large NTU (usually larger than 3) and thus a
l
large
size
i cannot be
b justified
j ifi d economically,
i ll since
i
a
large increase in NTU in this case corresponds to a
small increase in effectiveness. Thus, a heat
exchanger
g with a veryy high
g effectiveness mayy be
highly desirable from a heat transfer point of view
but rather undesirable from an economical point of
view.
2 For a given
2.
gi en NTU and capacit
capacity ratio c = Cmin
/Cmax, the counter-flow heat exchanger has the
highest effectiveness, followed closely by the
cross-flow heat exchangers with both fluids
unmixed.
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Discussions
3. The effectiveness of a heat exchanger is
independent of the capacity ratio c for
NTU values of less than about 0.3.
4. The value of the capacity ratio c ranges between
0 and 11. For a given NTU,
NTU the effectiveness
becomes a maximum for c = 0 and a minimum
for c = 1. The case c = Cmin /Cmax 0
corresponds to Cmax , which is realized
d i a phase-change
during
h
h
process iin a condenser
d
or
boiler. All effectiveness relations in this case
reduce to = max = 1 - exp(NTU) regardless of
yp of heat exchanger.
g Note that the
the type
temperature of the condensing or boiling fluid
remains constant in this case. The effectiveness
is the lowest in the other limiting case of c =
Cmin/Cmax = 1,
1 which
hich is realized
reali ed when
hen the heat
capacity rates of the two fluids are equal.
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
Conclusions
Note that the analysis
y of heat exchangers
g with unknown outlet temperatures
p
is
a straight forward matter with the effectivenessNTU method but requires
rather tedious iterations with the LMTD method.
When all
Wh
ll the
th inlet
i l t andd outlet
tl t ttemperatures
t
are specified,
ifi d the
th size
i off the
th heat
h t
exchanger can easily be determined using the LMTD method.
Alternatively, it can also be determined from the effectivenessNTU method
Alternatively
by first evaluating the effectiveness from its definition and then the NTU
from the appropriate NTU relation given in tabular form.
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD
P.Talukdar/ Mech-IITD