..

..

-1-

 10

9
2558
......../........./..........
.................................................. ...............................................

................................................. .............................................
*

( ) /

( ) /

( ) /

4
1
-2-

 2
3
4

1.

( ) ( )

2. ......................
3.

( )

( )

( ) /

4. ( 1 )
( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ...................................................

5.
( ) - ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ......................
6.

( ) //
( ) /
( ) /
( )
( )
( ) .......................................

7. ......................................./ ( )
-3-

( )

-4-

8.
8.1 ( )

( )

8.2

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

8.3 /

8.4
)
2

( )

) (

( )

( )

( ) (

9.
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) .....................................................

10.

( )

-5-

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) (

)
11.

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

12.

( ) ( )

( ) ( )
13. 6

......................../
......................../

( ) ( ) ................./

14. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )/ ( )
( )
( )
.....
15.
( )
.....

( )

16.
( )

( ) ( ) Cane ( ) Walker ( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

17. 6
( )

( ) ( 1 4)
-6-

18.

( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

19.

Snellen chart ...... (

6/12 50)
( ) ( )

( )

20. .................................. ()

( 5 .)

(5.1 8 .) (> 8 .)

21. ( 2 4)

>14

../23

>17

../30

>22

../30

-7-

22.

(EQ-5D)

1.



2.



3. (
)



4. /




5. /
-8-

-9-

3.1

1.

=
(.)/

..........
.......

18.524.9

/2

.................. /2

(.)2
2.

3.
/

...............................
/

...............................
.
................

................
/

..........................

-60100 /
-100140/6090
.

0.860.9

0.810.93

4. 5

(FTSST )

< 12

5. 30

(30-Second arm curl)

8 (3.63

11

- 10 -

.)
5
6.

(Hand grip)

0.60 .

65

10

( )

( )

/.
0.45 .
/.

7.

8.

9 .

10.

(2-minute step test)

(
:+/-)

5 .

(Back scratch test)

10

( :+/-)

5 .

(chair sit & reach test)

<12

3 (TUG)
()

11.

4 1

(10MWT) ()

- 11 -

3.2

( ) ( )

( )

( )
( )

( )

) / ( ) ( )

) .........

- 12 -

 4
1

1. 6 ...............

2. ** 1

*,**

* **

- 13 -

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

3.

3.

2.

4.
...............

3.

4.

4.

5.

6.

6.
7.

5.
...............

8.
9.
10.

11. (
)
12.

13.
14.
15. /

16. ...............

3. 1
- 14 -

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

2.

3.

3.

3.

4.

5.

5.
6.
7.
...............

4.
6.
7.
8.
9. ...............

- 15 -

( )

( )

.........

Mini-Mental State Examination-Thai version 2002

(MMSE Thai-2002)

4, 9 10

(
)
1. Orientation for time (5 )
( 1 )

- 16 -

1.1
.

1.2
.
1.3
.
1.4
.
1.5
.

2. Orientation for place (5 ) ( )

( 1 )
2.1
2.1.1
.

2.1.2
.

2.1.3 -
.
2.1.4
.
2.1.5
.
2.2

- 17 -

2.2.1
.

2.2.2 / / /
.

2.2.3 -
.
2.2.4
.
2.2.5
.
3. Registration (3 )
() 3 (,
....)
()
(, ....) 3

*
( 1 1 )
[

]
[

2
[

] [

- 18 -

(
)
4. Attention / Calculation (5 )
( )
(, ....)
?
4.1 4.2
4.1 100 7

()
5 1, 2 3
4.2
4.2 () (, ....)
(, ....)

----
(, ....)
[

...

5. Recall (3 )
3
( 1 1 )
[

]
[

- 19 -

] [

6. Nanting (2 )
6.1

6.2

7. Repetotion (1 )
(
1 )
() ()
(, ....) ()

8. Verbal command (3 )
() (, ....)
.......... ( )
-4
[

] [

] ( )
[

- 20 -

(
)
9. Written command (1 )

(, ....) (, ....)

[
.

10. Writing (1 )
(, ....)
1

..
[

]
11. Visueconstruction (1 )

.

- 21 -

..............................................................................................

3
EuroQOL (EQ-5D)8

6.



7.



8. (
)
- 22 -

9. /




10.

EQ-5D Scoring Formula (UK version)

Dimension

Coefficients for TTO

Constant (for any dysfunctional scale)

0.081

Mobility
Level 2

0.069

Level 3

0.314

Self-care
Level 2

0.104

Level 3

0.214

Usual activities
Level 2

0.036

Level 3

0.094

Pain/Discomfort
Level 2

0.123

Level 3

0.386

Anxiety/Depression
Level 2

0.071

Level 3

0.236

N3 (level 3 occurs within at least one

0.269

dimension)
( 2) ( 1)
( 2)
- 23 -

 ( 1) ( 3)
EQ-5D 1.00 (full health) 0.081 (constant term) 0.069
(mobility level 2) 0 (self-care level 1) 0.036 (usual activities level 2) 0 (pain level 1)
0.236 (anxiety level 3) 0.269 (N3: because level 3 occurs at least one dimension) = 0.309

()
1. Snellen chart
Snellen chart

1. Snellen
chart 6 (20 )

2. Snellen chart
1
7 20/20
3.

5 (
20/40) 6
2
- 24 -

6
20/40-2 5
6 2
20/40+2
2.

1.

2.

3.

: http://www.myfooddiary.com/resources/waist-to-hip_ratio_calculator.asp

3.

1.

- 25 -

2. 1

: , . .
2013; 26: 105-16.

4.

(10-Meter Walk Test: 10MWT)

10 4

3, 7 10

1.
10
2. 4

3
7
* (minimal detectable change, MDC)
0.1 /1

3m

4m

3m

5. 3 (Timed Up and Go Test: TUG)

- 26 -


1.
3

2.

* 4 9

6. 5 (Five Times Sit to Stand Test: FTSST)

1.
2. 5


* 2.5 10

7. (Hand grip)
(Grip
Dynamometer)

1.

- 27 -

2.
15


* : ( 4
)11

8. 30 (30-Second arm curl)

( = 8 3.63 .
= 5 2.27 .)

1.

2.

30
* :

http://sportscience.sat.or.th/information-detail-15.aspx

9.

(Chair sit & reach test)

- 28 -

1.
2
2.


* :

( 2.95-

3.54 )11

10. 2 (2-minute step test)

1. 2

2.

* :

1. Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF, Chandler JM, Studenski SA.

Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older
adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1727-34.
2. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Monsch AU, Iversen MD, Weyh A, von
Dechend M, et al. Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a
comparison of the timed 'up and go' test in community-dwelling and
institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 315-20.
3. Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C, Murray S, Lord S. The
comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls
in community-dwelling older people. Age Ageing 2008; 37: 430-5.
- 29 -

4. .
. . 2543.
5. Rikli R, Jones J. Functional fitness normative scores for communityresiding older adults. J Aging Phys Act 1999; 7: 162-81
6. Du H, Newton PJ, Salamonson Y, Carrieri-Kohlman VL, Davidson
PM. A review of the six-minute walk test: its implication as a selfadministered assessment tool. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009; 8: 2-8.
7. Thaweewannakij

T,

Wilaichit

S,

Chuchot

R,

Yuenyong

Y,

Saengsuwan J, Siritaratiwat W, Amatachaya S. Reference values of

physical performance in Thai elderly people who are functioning well
and dwelling in the community. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 1312-20.
8.

(Health-Related

Quality of Life). Thai Pharmaceutical and Health Science Journal

2007; 2(3): 327-37.
9. Mangione

KK, Craik

RL, McCormick

AA, Blevins

HL, White

MB, Sullivan-Marx EM, et al. Detectable changes in physical

performance measures in elderly African Americans. Phys Ther 2010;
90: 921-7.
10.

Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T. The five-times-sit-

to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older

females. Aging Clin Exp Res 2012; 24: 339-44.
11.

Alfonso-Rosa RM, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Saudo

B, Rogers ME. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change

scores for fitness assessment in older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Rehabil Nurs 2014; 39: 260-8.

- 30 -

- 31 -