)Human Rights Alert (NGO

"
" ,00433" 1600036
Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org

Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
Fax: 077-3179186

2017-01-03 Serious perversions by Judge Moshe Sobel in Ruth David trial

request for correction of false reporting was sent to journalist Yoav Yitzhak of
News1 //
7102-10-30
" "
[]ENGLISH BELOW

. ,
.
.
, !
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2017/01/2017-01-03.html :

: , ,
_____
" 30 ,
, . ,

. /
/" .
, " "
, ()
.
, , " " ,
.
, ,
.
!
, !

1/13


37102 ,
,
- NEWS1 "
":
: " , .
,
" ' ()75282-18-08
- . " , "
, .
" -
72 ,76 ,77 - 7106 , ,
" - " . , (
).
, ( ) " "
. . ,
" " , , " ,
".
, ,
,
.
/ ( SIMULATED COURT
- )HEARINGS /
.
" " , .
, .
, , 72 ,76 ,77 ,7106 ,
, " " ,
.
"" ,
, , ,
: "" . ,
?! []0
:
2/13

 ?

?
.
,
'
"

7102-10-17 : "" . :
, : ,
?! .
http://www.news1.co.il/Archive/001-D-386665-00.html
!
- " " , "" , " "
... " , "

"...
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/12/2016-12-26.html:

:
, , .

.
____
" 61 , - - (- )65312-31-61
. " ".
" " - ...
3/13

 :
)
- . :
? ? " , ...
! !
!
... : ( - . - ).
. ...

63- . , 1
( ).

) " "
, , " - " (
, ) .
. : ," , .
, " , .
" " (
) ." ,
. , "" ,
, , .
.
...

) "" " "

, , , ,
, . ? "
4/13

" ! , , "" " "

" , ,
. "" " "

.
, , .

: , (63 ,61 ,66

)6361 , , , ,
: " . " , ".
, ,
, .
/ -
/ . ,
, .
____________
) " "
, ( ) ,
, , .
: ," ...
" ,
" "

5/13

)
: ,

. : ,
,

) " " - "

: ,
?
, " " :
. ,
. ( -) .
, , ...
" - " . ,
,
.
: " "
, .
, .
' .6
, ,
, . ,

. ,
, .

, ...
6/13

)
.
,
.
, " " ,
... " ,

2017-01-03 Serious perversions by Judge Moshe Sobel in Ruth David trial request for
correction of false reporting was sent to journalist Yoav Yitzhak of News1
Judge Moshe Sobel perverts court process in one of the worst corruption scandals in the
history of the State of Israel. Public access to the courtroom is restricted by the
Administration of Courts, and media reports provide false reporting of the sham/simulated
hearings as true hearings of a lawful court of the State of Israel.
That's how it looks in a state, where the justice system is thoroughly corrupt!
Until we put some of the criminal judges in jail, it wont stop!
Read the complete post: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2017/01/2017-01-03.html

Figures: Yoav Yitzhak, Itamar Levine, News1

____
OccupyTLV, January 03 serious perversions by Judge Moshe Sobel have been discovered
in the trial of Ruth David, Ronel Fisher and others. Judge Moshe Sobel, in collusion with
State Prosecution Counsel Keren Altman and senior Defense Counsel like Jacob Weinroth,
are engaged in what would be considered from criminological perspective Organized Crime
in the Court perversion of court process and perversion of court records. The gang
perpetrated a series of sham/simulated/"fabricated" court hearings in the testimony of State
Witness Adi Yeshayahu.
Itamar Levine, News1 diligent and smart reporter provided for the public perverted reports
of such court hearings, which never took place as if they were authentic hearings of a
Court of the State of Israel.
Therefore, request was forwarded to journalist Yoav Yitzhak News1 owner to publish a
correction regarding the erroneous and perverted reports by Itamar Levine in this case.
Yoav Yitzhak is an experienced, well-known journalist, who earned his reputation by
courageous reports and expose's of various corruption scandals throughout the years,
including serious corruption scandals in the higher echelons of the justice system.
Judge Moshe Sobel's conduct presents serious corruption in a serious corruption trial!
Until we jail some of the criminal judges, it won't stop!

7/13

Following is the complete request letter, which was forwarded to Yoav Yitzhak
January 03, 2017
Yoav Yitzhak, Owner
News1
By email
RE: Serious perversions in State of Israel v Malka et al, and perverted reports in News1
request for publication of a correction.
Dear Yoav,
I read with great interest the recent reports by Itamar Levine regarding court hearings in State of
Israel v Malka et at (28759-05-15) in the Jerusalem District Court. As in other cases, News1
provides extensive reporting of court hearings, compared to other news media, particularly in
important government corruption cases.
However, inspection of the public online records in this case shows that three critical court hearings
the testimony of State Witness Adi Yeshayahu on December 22, 26 and 22, 2016 which were
extensively reported by Itamar Levine, were entered in the Case Calendar and also in Judge Sobel's
Calendar "Did not take place". Obviously, there are no protocols either for these court hearings
(see my publication below).
The Court Calendars are known worldwide for centuries (and similarly in Israel) as one of the
"Books of Court" of any competent court. The Court Calendar defines the lawful actions of the
court. Therefore, court hearings, which were entered "Did not take place", and have no protocols,
are what Israeli judges call "Informal, off the record hearings".
The conduct of such hearing, while those present in the courtroom have no idea regarding the
unusual nature of the hearings, and while media report them as valid actions of a court of the State
of Israel, is a patently anomalous condition.
From the perspective of international observers, such hearings would be considered sham/simulated
court hearing conduct which is known in criminology at typical of patently incompetent and/or
corruption court.
Obviously, News1 cannot publish reports, similar to the ones I publish, e.g., the one below. On the
other hand, it is difficult to believe that a diligent and smart reporter like Itamar Levine didn't notice
the strange and unusual state of affairs in this court file.
Perhaps there is room for a gentle correction, which simply states that the court hearings on
December 22, 26 and 22, 2016, which were reported by Itamar Levine are entered in the Court
Calendar "Did not take place" and that the reason for the discrepancy between the court records
and what took place in the courtroom is unknown.
As far as the possibility remains that this was an "error", I will do my best to address the matter
soon
At the same time, one should not your recent publication, regarding ruling by Supreme Court
Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, which says: Violations of Suspect's Rights wouldn't be Deemed
"Error". When a Police Investigator is involved, can one say that such failure was unintentional?!
[1]
According to the same logic:
Can one say that perversion of court process and court records by an experienced judge is
unintentional?
8/13

Can one say that perversion of media reporting regarding a judge's unusual and unreasonable
conduct by an experienced legal reporter is unintentional?
I would be glad to receive your expedient response.
Truly,
Joseph Zernik, PhD
OccupyTLV
LINK
2017-01-02 Rubinstein warns the police: Violations of Suspect's Rights wouldn't be Deemed
"Error". When a Police Investigator is involved, can one say that such failure was unintentional?!
News1

http://www.news1.co.il/Archive/001-D-386665-00.html
Ruth David-Ronel Fisher's trial serious perversions by Judge Moshe Sobel!
In Ruth David-Ronel Fisher's trial documentation of "brainstorming", preparing "cards",
"dark day" materials by an organized crime gang in the law and justice system. And
"informal, off the record" court hearings by Judge Moshe Sobel and senior attorneys like
Keren Altman and Jacob Weinroth following the Babushka principle and the "Beacon of
Justice" scheme
Read the complete post: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/12/2016-12-26.html
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/12/2016-12-26.html

Figures: Judge Moshe Sobel fabricates court process in collusion with the State Prosecution and
defense counsel in the trial of Ruth David, Ronel Fisher, Eran Malka and others a trial of one of
the worst corruption scandals in the history of the State of Israel. From criminological perspective,
there is no doubt that the conduct that was exposed in this case would be deemed Organized Crime
.in the justice system
____

9/13

OccupyTLV, December 26 media reporting in this court file State of Israel v Malka et al
(28759-05-15) one of the worst corruption scandals in the history of the State of Israel, is slim.
The exception is News1.
So we traveled to Jerusalem to exercise the right for Fair Public Hearing - on of the fundamental
Human Rights.
Here is what we discovered:
a) The office of Spokeswoman of Administration of Courts is managing public access to
the court.
In the Jerusalem District Court there is a heavy iron door at the entrance. Security personnel ask
you, while you are still on the sidewalk: Which case did you come for? Ruth David? Please give us
your ID, we have to check it on a case by case basis with the Spokeswoman of the Administration
of Courts
The office of the Spokeswoman I managing public access to the Court! Totally unreasonable
practice! Such practice undermines the right for "Fair Public Hearing" and public access to the
courts from their foundations!
Obviously, we were initially found unworthy The excuse: The courtroom is small and there is no
room (it is true that the courtroom was unreasonably small for such trial, but "no room" turned out
to be false".
Following lengthy discussion we entered. Also inside the courtroom, a representative of the
Spokeswoman arranged the seating and also tried to convince the court guards to have me
removed, even before the start of the hearing
There was barely room for 20 persons in the courtroom beyond the legal staff. Beyond media, I

believe that there were only 4 persons of the public at large present Shuki Mishol and us.
b) Regular "Brainstorming" by the Organized Crime gang
Adi Yeshayahu, the State Witness, described routine practices in the law-firm of Ronel Fisher
and Ruth David "Brainstorming" (her term, probably also a term used by Ronel Fisher and
Ruth David) in order to expand the Organized Crime business. They met regularly. E.g.: Police
officer Eran Malka, Attorney Ronel Fisher and his personal secretary Adi Yeshayahu. Malka
provided them names of suspects in new investigation files in the National Fraud Unit and the
National Corruption and Organized Crime Unit. Then they tried to identify "New Prospective
Clients" among them for the office. Then they tried to identify for each for the prospects (some
or most still under covert investigation) a third party, who would refer them to the office of
Fisher and David.
In later stages, Malka provided "materials" regarding the prospects, status of the investigation,
anticipated detention date, or interrogation date. Fisher would prepare them for the interrogation
10/13

based on the materials which were provided by Malka. Sometimes they simply advised people
to leave the country for a while...

c) The Organized Crime gang prepares "Cards", "Dark Day" materials

Amazingly, after their initial detention and interrogation, Ronel Fisher, Eran Malka and Adi
Yeshayahu were not held in detention and they were released with no serious restrictions. So what
did they do? "Brainstorming" of course! This time around they were preparing "Cards" and "Dark
Day" materials. According to the Adi Yeshayhau they prepared lists of other senior police
personnel in the National Fraud Unit and in the Corruption and Organized Crime Unit, and others
outside police, who were involved in similar conduct to that of Eran Malka and Ronel Fisher. It is
also clear that that Ronel Fisher and Ruth David have "Cards" and "Dark Day" materials on judges
and the State Prosecution, which were partners in the Organized Crime.
Therefore, it is obvious that the entire trial is a Show Trial. There has never been true investigation,
and there will never be a true trial of the scope of corruption in the top echelons of police, the State
Prosecution and the Courts

Figure: The Case Calendar shows that the critical court hearings (December 22, 26 and 27, 2016),
in which State Witness Adi Yeshayahu provided her testimony and described the details of
Organized Crime by Ruth David, Ronel Fisher, Eran Malka, were entered "Did not take place".
Israeli judges consider such court hearings "Informal, off the record hearings". However, such
conduct, especially when those in the courtroom are unaware of the unusual nature of the hearing,
11/13

and media report them as valid hearings of the courts, is entirely unreasonable. From
criminological perspective, such conduct would be deeded perpetrating sham/simulated court
hearings a cardinal sign of a patently incompetent and/or corrupt court. Since such conduct was
perpetrated through collusion of Judge Moshe Sobel, the State Prosecution and Defense Counsel, it
should also be deemed Organized Crime in the Court.
____________
d) The court hearing "Did not take place"
Right at the start of the court hearing, I suspected that it was a fabricated court hearing (a routine in
the Israeli courts today), since the court transcriptionist was not transcribing So I asked Shuki
Mishol, who was sitting next to me, and who was present in all hearings in this court case. Shuki
answered with complete confidence: "They record everything, and they will type the protocol later".
Well Not! As it later turned out, Judge Moshe Sobel entered the court hearings, pertaining to Adi
Yeshayahu's testimony- "Did not take place".
Apparently, the testimony of Adi Yeshayahu was more than the protocol of an Israeli court can
tolerate

e) The Babushka principle

The circumstances in this court case demonstrate the Babushka principle: When serious government
corruption is exposed, the need arises to exert even higher level government corruption in order to
contain the original corruption scandal.
Here: The need arose to exert organized crime in the Jerusalem District Court in order to contain the
organized crime in high levels of the Israel Police in collusion with former Tel-Aviv District
Attorney and a well-known attorney

f) The Judge David Rosen Beacon of Justice Scheme

The case begs the question: What is the purpose of Judge Moshe Sobels perversion of court process
in collusion with the State Prosecution and the Defense Counsel in conducting sham/simulated
hearings?
I am willing to bet, that Judge Moshe Sobel is operating according to the Judge David Rosen
"Beacon of Justice" Scheme: David Rosen totally perverted court process in the Holyland
corruption scandal, another notorious case. At the end of the trial in Judge David Rosens
12/13

courtroom, Judge Rosen purportedly convicted former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and purportedly
sentenced him for a long prison term. However, such judgments purportedly were reversed in
appeal to the Supreme Court (also a perverted court process).
And yet, through such conduct, David Rosen gained very favorable media reporting, and some got
swept off their feet, falsely seeing in him Beacon of Justice. On the other hand, by the time that
the appeal came to its close in the Supreme Court, the public was flooded by new corruption
scandals, and had no attention for the final outcome of the case.
In the case before us: If Judge Moshe Sobel follows the David Rosen Scheme he will convict
Ruth David and Ronel Fisher, and sentence them to long prison terms. Such judgments would be
based on the evidence from Adi Yeshayahus testimony, which fails to appear in the court file.
Judge Moshe Sobel would gain favorable media reporting, possibly be announced a new Beacon
of Justice.
Later, the Supreme Court would reverse Judge Moshe Sobels judgments, making some vague
remarks that Sobels judgments were not founded in the evidence Obviously, the Supreme Court
would not explicitly state that Adi Yeshayahus testimony fails to appear in the court file
The public is not dumb. The public may not understand all the technical details of judicial
corruption, but it is obvious that large part of the public believes that Ruth David is above the law,
and that she would not be lawfully punished for her crimes In parallel, public trust in the courts
continues to decline
g) Judicial corruption and media reporting
It is difficult to believe that experienced legal reporters fail to notice the blatant perversions, which
have become routine in corruption cases in the courts. Therefore, the false reporting by media of
such court cases should be viewed as effective collusion by media with the corrupt judges.
Indeed, reports of the Vienna conferences on Strengthening Judicial Integrity against Corruption
note that in nations, where the judges are corrupt, media usually collude with the judges

13/13