Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lee-Vs-Juanasdfasdfasdfas DF
Lee-Vs-Juanasdfasdfasdfas DF
ADMITTED FACTS:
STIPULATION OF FACTS:
1. Juan Phils, Inc. requested for another shipment thru email. = DENIED
2. The marketing proposal was made to continue the agreement between Juan Phils, Inc.
and Lee SG Co. = DENIED
3. Because of the loss in income, the defendant asked the removal of ZARAP product
which took two months from the delivery (September 2007 to November 2007). =
DENIED
4. Juan Phils, Inc. shall pay a fixed price for the products shipped. = DENIED
5. Lee SG Co. sent several emails to President Bonifacio of Juan Phils, Inc requesting for
the payment of 2 purchase orders. It was only when Juan Phils Inc received the email that
respondent refused to pay for the 2 purchase orders = NOT STIPULATED
6. That there was a decline in the sale. NOT STIPULATED
7. That Juan Phils did not ask for the marketing support for lee but lee offered the
marketing support. DENIED
8. That Juan is an agent of Lee in the Philippines DENIED
9. That Juan Phils Inc. requested for a signed hard copy purchased order DENIED
10. That Lee requires a stand by letter of credit in favor of them. ADMITTED
1. That there is a purchased order no. 123 and 456 that exist.
2. Whether Juan requested for the purchase of the item called ZARAP.
1. That Juan is liable to pay for the purchased order 123 & 456.
2. Whether the distribution agreement is a sale contract or an agency contract.