You are on page 1of 99

Division of Structural Engineering

Design of
Structural
Connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Chalmers University of Technology
Gteborg, Sweden

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Content
Design philosophy
Structural purpose
Force paths at different levels
Mechanical behaviour design aspects
Basic force transfer mechanisms
Compression
Shear
Tension
Bending - torsion
fib Bulletin on Structural connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of structural connections

Design aspects:
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Structural behaviour for ordinary


and excessive loads

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Appearance and function in the


service state

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Structural fire protection

Load bearing function


Separating function

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Manufacture
Production of precast elements
Handling, storage and transportation of
precast elements

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Mounting of precast systems


Mounting should be possible

Tolerances

Accessibility

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Modular co-ordination

Traditional detail Alternative detail

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Demountability

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force paths structural level

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force paths structural level

Diaphragm action

Fixed end
columns

Shear panels

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force paths structural level


Shear walls
Shear walls
Floor diaphragms
Compression
Compression Floor diaphragms

Shear
Shear
Tension
Tension

Shear
Shear

Core
Core
Tension
Tension
Compression
Compression

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force paths
structural subsystems

In-plane action of precast floor

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force paths
structural subsystems

In-plane action of precast wall

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

The force paths local level

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Alternative designs force paths

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Alternative
designs
force paths

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of the whole connection

The connection as part of the structural


system
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design and detailing


for safe force paths

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Flow of forces
through the
connection and
further away

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Mechanical behaviour

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Mechanical response

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Need for movement

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Balanced design for ductility

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Anchorage for ductility

Avoid anchorage failures

Provide anchorage for rupture of the steel

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Unintended restraint

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Avoid unfavourable crack locations


Unfavourable

Preferred

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Alternative solutions

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Unintended composite action

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Force transfer in connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Basic force transfer mechanisms


Shear

Compression
w

N N

Tension

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of compression
local compression,
compressive strength
in confined concrete
tension

stress dispersion
splitting effects

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Compression through several layers

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of bearings

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of soft bearings

Consider vertical resistance


Limit shear deformation for horizontal loads
Compression over the entire face of the bearing pad
Avoid direct contact in case of rotation
Avoid that the bearing protrudes outside the edges
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design examples

Wall connection
with mortar joint Beam support
with soft bearing

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design examples

Beam column connection Hollow core floor wall connection


with steel plates

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Bolted connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Failure modes of bolted


connection
Shear failure of bolt
Splitting of concrete
Combined bending
in bolt and crushing of
concrete

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Avoid splitting failure

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of splitting reinforcement

Compare with local


compression

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Dowel action one-sided


Failure
mechanism

Q Q

x0
High High
bending compression
stress

VR = 2 f cc f sy
Bending failure in bolt VR
x0 =
crushing of concrete 3 f cc

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Effect of eccentricity
eccentricity factor ke
Q 11 1

e fck/fyk
0.8
0,8
x0
k e1( e ) 0.6
0.6 20/500
k e2( e )
0.4
0,4
0.2
50/320
0,2
0.18322 0
VR = ke 2
f cc f sy 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0
0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5
2.5

VR e/
x0 =
3 f cc

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Dowel action two-sided


VR = 2 f cc f sy

Slip VR
x0 =
3 f cc
fcc

x0
2e
x0
fcc

Slip

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Different conditions
V1 = 2 f cc ,min f sy V1 = 2 f cc ,min f sy

VR VR
x 0 ,1 = x 0 ,1 =
3 f cc.min 3 f cc.min
fcc,min fcc,min

x0,1 x0,1

2e 2e
x0,2
fcc,max fcc,max

VR = 2 f cc ,max f sy

VR
x0, 2 =
3 f cc ,max
Failure
mechanism

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Response in shear
Shear force
V1 = 2 f cc ,min f sy

VR
x 0 ,1 =
3 f cc.min
fcc,min
Second plastic hinge plastic mechanism

First plastic hinge x0,1


2e

fcc,max
Shear slip

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Effect of restraint
VR = k r 2 f cc f sy
fcc
VR
x0 =
3 f cc

1 kr 2
x0
My,red

fcc

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Restraint and eccentricity


VR = ke ,r 2 f cc f sy

VR
x0 =
3 f cc
fcc
2
ke ,r = k r + 2

x0
e

fcc

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Effect of anchorage
VR = ( s As ) + 2 f cc f s ,red

fcc f r ,red = f s s

x0

x0
fcc

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

What happened here?

I II III

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Shear in joints

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Shear friction
Crack width

Crack
width
Shear slip Shear slip

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Self-generated friction

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Influence of bond and anchorage


w Fv

deformed bars
strain localisation
high steel stress

yields for
small slip,
friction dominates
Fv

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Influence of bond and anchorage


w Fv
joint separation
s shear slip

plain bars
induced
uniform strain
tension
low steel stress

yields for
large slip,
friction + dowel
Fv

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Compare with bolted connection


w Fv

s VR = ( s As ) + 2 f cc f s ,red

fcc f r ,red = f s s

x0

x0
fcc

Fv

Shear friction in joint Bolted connection


Plain bars with end anchors Plain bolt with end anchors
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Different responses

External bars Internal reinforcement


Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

When will the transverse bars yield?


w Fv

s Depends on:
joint roughness
bond resistance of
transverse bar

Fv

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Maximum crack width vs.


end slip response of transverse bar
Force in bar Force in bar

Force in bar

Crack width Crack width


Maximum crack width Maximum crack width
Bar yields in shear Bar yields not in shear friction
friction
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Increased joint separation

6
52

Joint profile with wave-


shaped undulations

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Joints with shear keys

shear stress

with shear keys

plain joints

slip

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Shear transfer clamping is needed

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Distributed ties provides clamping

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Concentrated ties provide clamping

Adequate between elements with high in-plane


stiffness that are arranged in the same plane

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Distributed ties are needed here

Inclined forces separate


the elements arranged
at a corner Example of distributed ties
between floor and wall

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Shear resistance of joints depends


on overall design of the subsystem

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design examples
Fv

High
High
compression
bending
stress

Response of plain dowel

Frictional resistance of concrete


interface

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Connections between wall


elements
monolithic

with shear keys

plain
monolithic plain with
shear-keys

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Connections between floor


elements

Uncracked joint
Cracked joints

Vertical shear
capacity

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

beff
7

Applications
6

3
4
1

reinforcement
in concrete 5
filled sleeves

transversal ties 2

cast in-situ
concrete

beff
joint fill
2 3 4
1

transversal ties
longitudinal tie

Shear transfer in hollow Shear transfer in composite


core floor beams

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of tension

pl
Fsu

y
l ty l t,pl

Anchorage with bond


Anchor head

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Headed bar

Concrete capacity
design approach

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Design of connection zone


The force must go further

Local compression Anchorage of headed bar

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Hollow core floor connection

Tensile capacity is
needed for:
diaphragm action
in floor
shear friction
resistance of joints

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Bond stress development

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Bond stress development

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Inclined bond forces


N

b . tan

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Splitting cracks

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Anchorage failures
N Nmax

Splitting

N Nmax

Pull-out

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Tensile force development


Tensile force Influence of embedment length
[kN]
140 Tensile capacity
120 Yield capacity N220
100 N290a
N500
80
H90b
60 H170
40 H210
H250
20
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Position x [mm]

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Bond stress - slip relation

Bond stress
Force [MPa]
50
45
40
. . .
. . . . .
. 35
30
Bond, b
HSC
. . 25
40 . .
.
. .
. 20
NSC

. . 15
mm . . . . 10
. 5
0
Slip 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Passive end-slip [mm]

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

End slip
Reference point
Slip

F
Steel bar Steel bar in tension

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Elastic response
Crack width [mm]
2,0
1.58184
2

32
w6 s

1,5 1.5 25
w8 s

w 10 s
20
w 16 s 16
1,0
w 20 s
1

12
w 25 s
10
0,5 8
w 32 s 0.5

6
0 0

0 0
0
0
100
1 10
8

200
2 10
8
s
300
3 10
8

400
4 10
8

500
5 10
8
5 .10
8

Steel stress [MPa]

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Yield penetration
2

pl
Fsu

y
lty lt,pl

Plastic zone
Elastic zone

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Response of connections
N Rupture
Fsu
of bar

Fsy

N N

wy 0,5 wu wu w

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

This information was needed


w Fv

s
When will the
transverse bars
yield?

Depends on:
joint roughness
bond resistance of
transverse bar
Fv

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Maximum crack width vs.


end slip response of transverse bar
Force in bar Force in bar

Force in bar

Crack width Crack width


Maximum crack width Maximum crack width
Bar yields in shear Bar yields not in shear friction
friction
Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Examples
N [kN]

109
101

Prediction of end-slip send [mm]


response of anchor bar
send,y = 0,5send,u = send,u =
0,468 0,795 1,59

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Examples
Design of anchorage allowing
for full yield penetration

Effect of local weakening

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Examples
Estimation of tie bar stiffness

N N

Design of loop
connection

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Prevention of progressive
collapse
Withstand accidental
loading
Reducing the risk of
accidental loading
Increase redundancy and
prevent propagation of
initial damage

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Analysis of collapse mechanisms


3,0
Q

3,0

4,5
3,0
6,0

5,0 5,0
[m]
N Tie force
Fsu

Fsy
d

A B
wy 0,5 wu wu w
Crack width l

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of bending moment

Beam column
connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of bending moment

Column splice Column base


connection connections

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of bending moment

Floor connections:
no restraint, unintended restraint, full restraint, partial
continuity in the service state

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Example
2 rebars d=12
L = 5300
Rebars d 10 50
c/c 300, 40
L = 200+300 100
Thin plastic w
30
Plywood board 60 70 sheet
Fs
30x50x60 100 100 d
under webs, 200
2 pc./slab end

Moment rotation response of connection at end support

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

Transfer of torsional moment


q

Torsional restraint
at beam support
Simply supported Firmly connected

Bjrn Engstrm
Division of Structural Engineering

fib Bulletin on
Structural Connections
Encourage good practice in design of
structural connections
Design philosophy
Connections Structural system
Understanding of basic force transfer
mechanisms

Bjrn Engstrm

You might also like