Failure rates of electromechanical components are required for Approvals, test certificates, characteristic curves calculating the safety integrity or safety integrity level (SIL) in An overview of the certificates available for Industrial Control functional safety: products along with more technical documentation can be - in the manufacturing industry at a high demand rate consulted daily on the Internet at: (high demand) - in the process industry at a low demand rate www.siemens.com/sirius/approvals (low demand) Further requirements are laid down in IEC 61511-1 "Functional safety Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector Part 1: Framework, definitions, system, hardware and software requirements". The German versions of the above standards are: DIN EN 62061 DIN EN ISO 13849 DIN EN 61511-1 The TV-tested Safety Evaluation Tool assists in calculating the safety function as verification for the machine documentation. It is available as a free download on the Internet at www.siemens.com/safety-evaluation-tool. At www.siemens.com/safety-integrated you will also find examples of functions with calculations according to the current standards. Definitions (t) dt is the probability that a unit which has not failed by a certain time t will fail in the following interval (t; t +dt). Failure rates have the dimension 1/time unit, e.g. 1/h. Failure rates for components are often specified in FIT (failures in time unit): 1 FIT equals 10-9/h. From the failure rate it is possible to derive a (mathematical) Product support: Approvals/certificates distribution function of the failure probability: F(t) = 1 - exp(-t), with as constant failure rate The mean value of this exponential distribution is also referred to as: - Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) in the case of irreparable components; 63.2 % of components fail by the MTTF. - Mean Operating Time Between Failures (MTBF) in the case of reparable components. MTTF = 1/ (MTTF is a statistical mean value but no guarantee for endurance). Electromechanical components are often irreparable components. In general, the failure rate of monitored units changes with age. The B10 value for devices subject to wear is expressed in number of operating cycles: It is the number of operating cycles after which 10 % of the test specimens fail in the course of an endurance test (or: the number of operating cycles after which 10 % of the devices have failed). For low demand rates (mainly in the process industry), the failure rate and not the B10 value is used to determine the failure probability. Standard B10 values at a high demand rate Product support: Characteristics With the help of the B10 value and a simplified formula (see Safety characteristics Section 6.7.8.2.1 of EN 62061), the user can then calculate the total failure rate of an electromechanical component: In the following standards, the so-called B10 values for = 0.1 x C / B10 calculating the safety integrity or safety integrity level (SIL) in functional safety at a high or continuous demand rate are with C = operating cycles per hour. C is specified by the user. required also for electromechanical switchgear: IEC 62061 "Safety of machines Functional safety of safety- related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control systems", 16
ISO 13849-1 "Safety of machines Safety-related components
of controls Part 1: General principles".
16/10 Siemens IC 10 2017
Siemens AG 2016
Appendix
Standards and approvals
The failure rate is made up of safe (S)- and dangerous (D) Calculation example failures: A protective door is monitored by a position switch with a = S+ D separate actuator. or The protective door is opened 4 times an hour. D = [proportion of dangerous failures in %] x The overall failure rate of the position switch is: S = [proportion of safe failures in %] x = 0.1 C / B10 [failures/h] = 0.1 4 / 1000 000 = 4 10-7 [failures/h] The failure rate of the dangerous failures D of the components used is needed for further calculations. The dangerous failure rate is calculated with: Listed in the following table are the standard B10 values and the D = 20% of = 0.2 4 10-7 [failures/h] share of dangerous failures for SIRIUS product groups at a high D = 8 10-8 [failures/h] demand rate. Standard B10 values (at a high demand rate) Standard failure rates (at a low demand rate) SIRIUS product group Standard Proportion of On the basis of the failure rates, it is possible to calculate the (electromechanical components) B10 value1) dangerous average probability of failure on demand (PFDavg) of a PLT (operating failures protective device. cycles) A so-called low demand rate is assumed, meaning the rate of 3SB2 EMERGENCY OFF/ 100 000 20% demand on the safety-related system amounts to no more than EMERGENCY STOP control devices once a year and is not greater than double the frequency of the (with positive-opening contacts) repeat test. 3SU1 EMERGENCY OFF/STOP command 100 000 20% A repeat test once a year is recommended for devices (with positive-opening contacts) electromechanical components in order to reveal passive faults. Selector switches - 3 positions 300 000 20%2) For special applications it is possible, in agreement with the - 2 positions, latching 500 000 20%2) inspecting institution (e.g. a technical inspectorate, government - 2 positions, latching 100 000 20%2) agency or the like) to extend the test intervals by using suitable Key-operated switches solutions (e.g. a multi-channel version etc.). - Momentary contact 500 000 20%2) - 3 positions, latching 300 000 20%2) Listed in the following table are the standard failure rates and the - 2 positions, latching 100 000 20%2) share of dangerous failures for SIRIUS product groups at a low 3SE7 cable-operated switches for 100 000 50% demand rate. EMERGENCY OFF/EMERGENCY-STOP function (with positive-opening contacts) Standard failure rates at a low demand rate 3SE5/3SF1 position switches (with positive-opening contacts) SIRIUS product group Standard Share of Standard position switches 10 000 000 20% failure rate dangerous (basic switches only) (electromechanical components) (in FIT)1) failures2) Standard position switches 1 000 0003) 20% (incl. actuator head) With separate actuator 1 000 000 20% 3SB2/3SU1 EMERGENCY OFF/ With tumbler 1 000 000 20% EMERGENCY STOP control devices (spring-loaded interlocking) (with positive-opening contacts) Pull to unlatch 100 20% 3SE29 foot switches Rotate to unlatch (also with lock) 100 20% Momentary contact 1 000 000 50% Latching 100 000 50% 3SU1 Selector switches Contactors/motor starters for switching - 3 positions 100 20%3) motors: - 2 positions, latching 100 20%3) 3RT10/3RT20/3TF6 1 000 000 4) 73% - 2 positions, latching 100 20%3) 5) 3TC 1 000 000 73% Key-operated switches 6) 3RH1/3RH2 contactor relays and auxiliary 1 000 000 73% - Momentary contact 100 20%3) switches (with positively driven contacts) - 3 positions, latching 100 20%3) 1) - 2 positions, latching 100 20%3) Only applies under the conditions specified in the technical specifications 2) 3SE7 cable-operated switches for 100 20% Share of dangerous failures: 50% when using the NO contact EMERGENCY OFF/EMERGENCY-STOP (additionally, a positive-opening contact must always be used in a function (with positive-opening contacts) redundant architecture; the sole use of a normally open contact is not permissible) 3SE5/3SF1 position switches 3) The B10 value can be higher depending on the actuator head used. (with positive-opening contacts) 4) Standard position switches 100 20% The B10 value was calculated for 66% of the rated current value Ie and (incl. actuator head) AC-3/400 V. Further values on request. With separate actuator 100 20% 5) Contact load/utilization category on request. With tumbler 100 20% 6) (spring-loaded interlocking) The B10 value was calculated for 33% of the rated current value Ie and AC-15/-14/230 V or DC-13/24 V. Further values on request. Contactors/motor starters (with positive opening contacts or The B10d value used in EN ISO 13849-1 is determined as mirror contacts) follows: 3RT10/3RT20//3TF6 100 < 40% B10 3TC 100 < 40% B10d = Proportion of dangerous failures 1) The failure rates specified in the table were limited to 100 FIT. 2) Valid only under the previously mentioned conditions. 3) Share of dangerous failures: 50% when using the NO contact (additionally, a positive-opening contact must always be used in a 16
redundant architecture; the sole use of a normally open contact is not