Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TYPES :
1. POSITIVE DISCIPLINE
2. NEGATIVE DISCIPLINE
3. PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE
1. POSITIVE DISCIPLINE:
2.NEGATIVE DISCIPLINE:
1
REGULATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN LAID DOWN, FAILING
WHICH PENALTIES AND PUNISHMENT WOULD BE
IMPOSED ON THEM. THUS, THE OBJECTIVE OF USING
PUNITIVE OR COERCIVE DISCIPLINE IS TO ENSURE THAT
EMPLOYEES DO NOT VIOLATE RULES AND
REGULATIONS FORMED BY THE ORGANISATION.
2
THE HOT STOVE RULE :
THE "HOT-STOVE RULE" OF DOUGLAS MCGREGOR
GIVES A GOOD ILLUSTRATION OF HOW TO IMPOSE
DISCIPLINARY ACTION WITHOUT GENERATING
RESENTMENT. THIS RULE DRAWS AN ANALOGY
BETWEEN TOUCHING A HOT STOVE, AND UNDERGOING
DISCIPLINE. WHEN YOU TOUCH A HOT STOVE, YOUR
DISCIPLINE IS IMMEDIATE, WITH WARNING,
CONSISTENT, AND IMPERSONAL.
THESE FOUR CHARACTERISTICS, ACCORDING TO
MCGREGOR, AS APPLIED TO DISCIPLINE ARE AS
FOLLOWS:
1. WHEN YOU TOUCH THE HOT STOVE, YOU BURN YOUR
HAND. THE BURN WAS IMMEDIATE. WILL YOU BLAME
THE HOT STOVE FOR BURNING YOUR HAND?
IMMEDIATELY, YOU UNDERSTAND THE CAUSE AND
EFFECT OF THE OFFENSE. THE DISCIPLINE WAS
DIRECTED AGAINST THE ACT NOT AGAINST ANYBODY
ELSE. YOU GET ANGRY WITH YOURSELF, BUT YOU
KNOW IT WAS YOUR FAULT. YOU GET ANGRY WITH
THE HOT STOVE TOO, BUT NOT FOR LONG AS YOU
KNOW IT WAS NOT ITS FAULT. YOU LEARN YOUR
LESSON QUICKLY.
3
COMPANY PRESCRIBING THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATION
OF ANY PARTICULAR RULE SO YOU CANNOT CLAIM
YOU WERE NOT GIVEN A PREVIOUS WARNING.
3. THE DISCIPLINE WAS CONSISTENT. EVERY TIME YOU
TOUCH THE HOT STOVE YOU GET BURNED.
CONSISTENCY IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF
DISCIPLINARY ACTION IS ESSENTIAL. EXCESSIVE
LENIENCY AS WELL AS TOO MUCH HARSHNESS
CREATES NOT ONLY DISSATISFACTION BUT ALSO
RESENTMENT.
4. THE DISCIPLINE WAS IMPERSONAL. WHOEVER
TOUCHES THE HOT STOVE GETS BURNED, NO MATTER
WHO HE IS. FURTHERMORE, HE GETS BURNED NOT
BECAUSE OF WHO HE IS, BUT BECAUSE HE TOUCHED
THE HOT STOVE. THE DISCIPLINE IS DIRECTED AGAINST
THE ACT, NOT AGAINST THE PERSON. AFTER
DISCIPLINARY ACTION HAS BEEN APPLIED, THE
SUPERVISOR SHOULD TAKE THE NORMAL ATTITUDE
TOWARD THE EMPLOYEE.
IN APPLYING THIS HOT STOVE RULE IN DISCIPLINARY
ACTION, THERE MUST BE ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES,
RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CERTAIN
BEHAVIOR AND CONDUCT WHICH WERE ISSUED AND
CLEARLY EXPLAINED TO EMPLOYEES AND ACCEPTED
BY THEM FOR COMPLIANCE. DISCIPLINARY ACTION
MUST BE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ACT, NOT AGAINST
THE PERSON. IT MUST BE USED BY SUPERVISORS AS A
TOOL TO DEVELOP THE EMPLOYEE AND THE GROUP.
THE STEPS THAT SHOULD BE FOLLOWED ARE:
4
IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF THE OFFENSE MUST BE
DONE TO DETERMINE THE FACTS. PROMPTNESS IS
NECESSARY IN ORDER THAT THE EMPLOYEE WILL
ASSOCIATE THE INVESTIGATION WITH THE OFFENSE
RATHER THAN WITH HIS PERSON.
PREVIOUS WARNING. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE
ORGANIZATIONS POLICIES, RULES AND REGULATIONS
ARE ISSUED TO AND EXPLAINED TO ALL EMPLOYEES
UPON INDUCTION AS PART OF THE ORIENTATION
PROGRAM. THIS SHOULD BE DONE BY THE SUPERVISOR
WITH THE HELP OF HUMAN RESOURCES. IN ADDITION,
WHENEVER NEW POLICIES, RULES AND REGULATIONS
ARE DEVELOPED, THE EMPLOYEE MUST BE MADE
AWARE OF THEM.
CONSISTENCY IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF
DISCIPLINARY ACTION IS HIGHLY ESSENTIAL SO THAT
EMPLOYEES WILL KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT AS A
CONSEQUENCE OF AN INFRACTION OR VIOLATION OF
THE RULE OR REGULATION.
DISCIPLINARY ACTION MUST BE IMPERSONAL. IT
SHOULD BE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ACT, NOT THE
PERSON. IT SHOULD BE INSTITUTIONAL, THAT IS, FOR
THE PROTECTION AND INTEREST OF THE ENTIRE
ORGANIZATION AND FOR ALL EMPLOYEES, AND NOT
DONE TO SATISFY THE PERSONAL WHIM OF THE
SUPERVISOR.
5
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE :
TWO CORE POINTS IN THE CONCEPT OF PRINCIPLES OF
NATURAL JUSTICE
6
THE DATE AND PLACE OF ENQUIRY, NAME OF THE
ENQUIRY OFFICER, THE RIGHT OF THE CHARGE
SHEETED EMPLOYEE TO BE DEFENDED IN THE
ENQUIRY BY DEFENCE REPRESENTATIVE
(ANOTHER EMPLOYEE HAVING EXPERTISE IN THE
MATTER) SHOULD BE INFORMED TO THE CHARGE
SHEETED EMPLOYEE SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE.
THE CHARGE SHEETED EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE
INFORMED ABOUT HIS RIGHT, TO HAVE DEFENCE
REPRESENTATIVE, TO BRING EVIDENCE/
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT OF HIS CAUSE, TO CROSS
EXAMINE THE EVIDENCES AND WITNESS OF THE
MANAGEMENT TO DEFEND HIMSELF IN THE
ENQUIRY.
EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY
OF BEING HEARD IN THE MATTER BY THE
DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY ON THE QUANTUM OF
PUNISHMENT TO BE IMPOSED.
THE QUANTUM OF PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE
COMMENSURATE WITH NATURE OF MISCONDUCT.
7
OF MISDEMEANOURS OR MISCONDUCTS ALONGWITH
PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED IN CASE OF
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AND ALSO PUNISHMENTS
TO BE AWARDED TO THE GUILTY PERSON FOR PROVEN
MISCONDUCT. IN THIS CONNECTION, IT MAY BE BORNE
IN MIND THAT THE LIST OF MISCONDUCTS IS NOT
EXHAUSTIVE ONE BUT IS ILLUSTRATIVE. OUT OF THE
MISCONDUCTS STATED THEREIN, CERTAIN ARE
CONSIDERED AS MAJOR MISDEMEANOUR OR MAJOR
MISCONDUCTS AND OTHERS MAY BE CONSIDERED AS
MINOR MISDEMEANOURS OR MINOR MISCONDUCTS.
WHILE MAKING A CHARGE SHEET THE EXACT CHARGES
OF MISCONDUCTS FRAMED ARE QUOTED IN LINE WITH
THE MISCONDUCTS AS STATED IN THE CERTIFIED
STANDING ORDERS.
8
GROSS OR SERIOUS MISCONDUCT
THERE IS NO LEGAL DEFINITION OF GROSS
MISCONDUCT BUT IT WOULD GENERALLY INCLUDE
CRIMINAL ACTS
THEFT
INTENTIONAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY
ASSAULT
DERELICTION OF DUTY
SERIOUS BREACH OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
PROCEDURE
FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOUR
FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS
ABUSE OF COMPANY POLICIES/PROCEDURES
ABUSE OF TRUST
SERIOUS SEXUAL HARASSMENT, HARASSMENT,
BULLYING
SERIOUS BREACHES OF INTERNET/EMAIL POLICY
SERIOUS BREACHES OF DATA PROTECTION POLICY
VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR
DOMESTIC ENQUIRY :
1. PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY
REPORT FROM THE CONCERNED
DEPARTMENTAL AUTHORITY.
TO ADOPT THE FACT FINDING PROCEDURE
PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE SHOULD APPLY
9
2. CHARGE SHEET
SHOULD BE WRITTEN, CLEAR.
SHOULD MENTION TIME, DATE, PLACE OF
INCIDENT AND PARTICULARS OF CHARGES.
SHOULD MENTION PROVISIONS OF STANDING
ORDERS .
ALLOW SPECIFIC TIME FOR REPLY.
DO NOT SHOW THAT THE PERSON IS GUILTY
AND DOES NOT MENTION ANY PENALTY.
5. ENQUIRY NOTICE
MENTION NAME OF THE ENQUIRY OFFICER,
DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF THE ENQUIRY.
MENTION FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO DEFEND
THE CASE.
10
6. ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS
THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD BE RECORDED.
ALLOW THE ASSISTANT OF THE ACCUSED
PERSON IF REQUIRED BY HIM.
ALLOW THE ACCUSED EMPLOYEE TO EXAMINE
ANY DOCUMENT WHICH IS PRODUCE AT THE
ENQUIRY.
EXAMINE FIRST THE WITNESSES OF THE
COMPLAINANT (COMPANY) THEN ALLOW CROSS
EXAMINATION BY THE ACCUSED PERSON.
EXAMINE THE WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS OF
THE ACCUSED PERSON AND THEN ALLOW CROSS
EXAMINATION BY THE COS REPRESENTATIVE.
NO WITNESS WHO IS YET TO BE EXAMINED
SHOULD BE PRESENT WHEN ANOTHER WITNESS
BEING EXAMINED OR CROSS EXAMINED.
AN ENQUIRY OFFICER MAY ASK ONLY SUCH
QUESTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR
CLARIFICATION.
ASK AT THE END OF THE ENQUIRY WHETHER
THE ACCUSED PERSON HAS GOT ALL
OPPORTUNITIES TO DEFEND HIS CASE AND
WHETHER HE IS SATISFIED.
11
FINDINGS SHOULD BE SPECIFIC AND NOT
INCONCLUSIVE.
IF MISCONDUCT/S OCCURS DURING ENQUIRY
PROCEEDINGS THE SAME CAN NOT BE DECIDED
BY THE ENQUIRY OFFICER IN THE SAME
PROCEEDINGS.
10. PUNISHMENT
SHOULD BE COMMUNICATED IN WRITING
AFTER GETTING THE REPLY(IF ANY) OF THE
ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS AND THE REPORT OF
THE ENQUIRY OFFICER.
COMPLIANCE OF SEC 33 OF INDUSTRIAL
DISPUTES ACT, 1947 IF ANY INDUSTRIAL
DISPUTE IS PENDING.
12
13
14