Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ri Andragogi 2015-2016
Ri Andragogi 2015-2016
Tarikh:
6. Learning Outcomes
At the end of the course, student shouldbe able to :
6.1 give comment on adults learning book.
6.2 critisize the methods on adult learning according to races, genders in
Malaysia and international
6.3 analyze and make an interpretation analysis about adults learning and
intelectual dimension, practical in life.
6.4 analyze and make conclusion about conceptual plan of adults learning
and prediction in the process of teaching and learning.
6.5 integrate and construct latest knowledge and information in writing about
andragogy.
6.6 analyze formal and informal of adults through post modernisation.
6.7 debate the DAMN circle for long life learning and to compare Malaysia
with international country.
7. Main reference
Maznah Muhamad & Carter. G.L (2000). Prinsip Pembelajaran Orang Dewasa.
Kuala Lumpur. Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Hamdan, Hanipah & Mohamad Saprin (2004). Teknik Mengajar Dewasa. Kuala
Lumpur. Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Robin Usher, Lan Bryant and Rennie Johnston (1997). Adult Education and the
postmodern challenge, learning beyond the limits. London and New York.
Routledge.
David Gray, Colin Griffin, Tony Nasta (2000) Training to teach in further and adult
education. Stanley Thornes. United Kingdom.
Clive Chappell, Carl Rhodes, Nicky Solomon, Mark Tennant and Lyn Yates
(2003). Reconstructing the lifelong learner Pedagogy and identity in
individual, organizational and social change. London and New York.
RoutledgeFalmer.
Stephen Brookfield (1983). Adult Learners, Adult Education and the Community,
Buckingham. Open University Pess.
Mohd. Azhar Abdul Hamid, Paimah Atoma, Muhamad Fauzi Othman, Mohd.
Nasir Markom (2004). Bentong. Malindo Printeds Sdn. Bhd.
8. Mode of Delivery
Interactive lecture
Group work
Presentation
Mocro-teaching
9. Assessments
Assignment 1 Presentation - 10%
Assignment 2 Individual - 20%
Assignment 3 Group - 30%
Final Exam - 40%
Total - 100%
Question and
Discussion
Coursework
Presentation
Problem Based
Learning
Task Spesification
A- 75 79 3.70 Cemerlang
B+ 70 74 3.40 Baik
B 65 69 3.00 Lulus
B- 60 64 2.70 gagal
PENGGREDAN KI
Skala Kriteria
Perbincangan, Kom
Menyatakan, Reconstructing the perbahasan, soal Clive Chappell
memberi contoh, lifelong learner jawab, memberi Carl Rhodes
membanding dan a. Pendapat islam
dan barat kuliah, memberi Nicky Solomon
membeza meramal,
b. Kajian terhadap respon. Mark Tennant
membuat inferens,
menjana idea, orang Malaysia Lyn Yates
menjelaskan dengan terhadap
contoh, pembelajaran
menghuraikan, sepanjang
9
menyusun mengikut hayat
keutamaan,
menggunakan
perhubungan masa
dan ruang, membuat
kesimpulan.
International Perbincangan, Kom
Menyatakan, Perspectives on Lifelong perbahasan, soal
memberi contoh, Learning jawab, memberi
membanding dan a. ciri-ciri penyelidikan
penilaian kuliah, memberi
membeza meramal,
respon.
membuat inferens, b. Model-model
menjana idea, penyelidikan
menjelaskan dengan penilaian
contoh,
10 menghuraikan,
menyusun mengikut
keutamaan,
menggunakan
perhubungan masa
dan ruang, membuat
kesimpulan.
Perbincangan, Kom
Menyatakan, a) Pembelajaran orang perbahasan, soal
memberi contoh, dewasa di zaman jawab, memberi
membanding dan pasca modenisasi. kuliah, memberi
membeza meramal, b) Pembelajaran global respon.
membuat inferens, orang dewasa.
menjana idea,
menjelaskan dengan
contoh,
12 menghuraikan,
menyusun mengikut
keutamaan,
menggunakan
perhubungan masa
dan ruang, membuat
kesimpulan.
a. Fasilitator, jurulatih, Perbincangan, Kom Hamdan Abd.Kadir,
Menyatakan, mentoring, dalam perbahasan, soal Dr.Hanipah &
memberi contoh, Pembelajaran jawab, memberi Mohamad (2004)
membanding dan Kolaboratif dan dan kuliah, memberi
membeza meramal, Koperatif di kalangan respon.
membuat inferens, pembelajaran
menjana idea, dewasa di Sektor
menjelaskan dengan Industri.
13 contoh,
menghuraikan,
menyusun mengikut
keutamaan,
menggunakan
perhubungan masa
dan ruang, membuat
kesimpulan.