Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meta-Principles in Luria's Neuropsychology
Meta-Principles in Luria's Neuropsychology
,",
6
SKOLEPSYKOLOGI
ARGANG 8 - NR. 6 - 1971
Bestyrelse:
Formand Anders Poulsen, Skovkilden 4, 2880 Bagsvmrd, privat:
(01) 98 21 06, kontor (01) 8663 80
Nmstformand. medlemskartotek og indmeldeiser:
B(JJrgeJensen, Katholmvej 11, 4700 Nmstved, privat: (03) 722072,
kontor: (03) 72 01 53
Kasserer: Svend E. Christensen, Aileen 29, 8660 Skanderborg, (06) 520346
Sekretmr: Poul Thomsen, Norgesvej 18 A, 2800 Lyngby, (01) 88 37 86
Indmeidelser sendes til B(JJrgeJensen
Sekretmr og kasserer for fagllge mader: Knud Haure-Petersen, lslandsve] 17,
7700 Thisted, (07) 92 23 86 SKOLEPSYKOLOGI
ARGANG 8 - NR. 6 - 1971
Redaktlon:
(Formulated in a letter to prof. Douglas Bowden, dated *This paper was originally presented at the Convention of the
[ebr. 20. 1971, Souhanovo, near Moscow, sign. A. R. Luria). American Psychological Association, New York, 1966. It is not necess-
arily an overview af Professor Luria's research and theory as he
would present it. It is, rather, a synopsis by one who has felt his own
Terminology:
thinking very much influenced by contact with Professor Luria and
Centrencephalic system Penfields term for a hypothesized central
his writings. The author expresses his thanks to Professor Luria for
structure of neurones in the brain stem which is conceived of as the his very generous consultation and assistance in gathering the lite-
anatomical basis for the coherent unity of mental processes. In many rature on which the paper is based and sincerely hopes that in
respects, the centrencephalic system would appear to be identical with emphasizing those themes which appear most essential to himself, he
the reticular activating system.
has not distored the original concepts or experimental intentions of
408 (from Hinsie & Campbell: Psychiatric Dictionary, N. Y. 1970). Professor Luria. 409
The word function is ubiquitous to Luria's writings. He With this conception of human functions in mind, one can
uses the term with variable degrees of specificity. Functions define four major postulates to which Luria has adhered
in the most general sense include such phenomena as speech, throughout most of his career. The first is that the cerebral
reading, and calculation; in a somewhat less general sense, component of any functional system results from the inter-
functions include abstraction, selective attention, memori- action of a constellation of cerebral areas. Thus, a function
zation, etc. In individual experiments, function usually refers is localizable in the sense that damage to any one of the
to the fulfillment of a specific task, such as pressing a rubber areas involved destroys the functional system responsible for
bulb to an auditory signal, building a house from blocks, or it. Secondly, a given function may be performed in different
narrating a story from memory. ways, i. e., by different functional systems depending upon
the individual and the circumstances in which he finds him-
Different functions are performed by different functional
self. Thus a function is not localizable in the sense that if
systems, In the 1920's, Luria used functional system as a
damage to a structure destroys the functional system on
psychophysiological term which referred to interactions
which it is based another system can be developed to carry
between affect, motor activity, and thought processes.
out the same function. Thirdly, the most powerful adaptive
Characteristics of a functional system were inferred from
functions which man possesses, such as abstraction, com-
vegetative, somatic, and speech reactions which were
putation, and speech itself, depend upon functional systems
recorded as the subj ect performed a task. Hypotheses were
which are acquired rather than innate. The fourth major
stated regarding the psychological interaction of, for instance,
postulate is that the most important determinat of functional
massive affect and regulatory speech processes. At that time
systems in man is the organization of the social environment.
he was little inclined to speculation about the brain structures
involved in such interactions. Challenges to these postulates have given rise to hundreds
In the mid-1930's his interests broadened to include the of experiments over the past 45 years. It would be impossible
organization of functional systems within the brain. to summarize all of Luria's ,work in a few pages. The in-
Through his study of thousands of patients with focal brain tention here is rather to give some impression of the variety
lesions, the term functional system has come to have a of his attempts to test his theory by citing several types of
definite neuroanatomical connotation. It would be incorrect, experiment and indicating how they relate to his major
however, to consider this the entire essence of the concept. theses.
In its present form, the concept of a functional system The following is an example of how the cortical con-
involves two components: a cerebral component and an stellations .hypothesis has been studied. Luria found that
environmental component. The function reading for word blocking was characteristic of aphasias associated with
instance, cannot occur where either a book or a human brain lesions in several different areas. He did not conclude from
is lacking. Thus, the concept of a functional system for this, however, that the areas were equipotential for word
reading is incomprehensible unless reading material, i. e., finding. He analyzed the syndromes further and found that
the environmental component, is included in the definition. with lesions of the superior premotor area the blocking
The book is as essential a part of the functional system for was associated with a general inability to perform repetitive
410 reading as the occipital cortex. motor patterns smoothly. For instance, patients with superior 411
premotor lesions were incapable of reproducing a rythm can be connected in a variety of ways to perform the same
(II III II III .... ) tapped out by the examiner. function. Indeed, a major tenet of Luria's theory is that one
With lesions af the temporo-parieto-occipita] region, on principal difference between the human and lower animals
the other hand, motor patterns were intact, but the patients is the plasticity of brain function, the ease with which
had difficulty comprehending certain simple grammatical temporary connections are made and broken by means of
constructions. For instance, instructed to draw a circle the second signal system.
under a square, they might draw a circle and, under it, The idea that speech might be restored by reorganizing
a square; they tended to follow the sequence of operations the speech system to comprise a different constellation of
conveyed by the sequence of words in the instruction rather cortical areas was the theoretical basis of a large scale re-
than the sequence of operations defined by its grammatical habilitation program for aphasics undertaken by Luria dur-
structure. The associated deficit suggested that word blocking ing and after World War II (1). It was found, for instance,
in this syndrome might be due to a loss of semantic and that patients with oral apraxias could regain control of the
grammatic associations through which words would or- oral apparatus required for speech by observing the move-
dinarily be retrieved. ments of the tongue and lips in a mirror as they attempted
Finally, patients with lesions in the left inferotemporal to talk. In such cases, the mirror besame an environmental
area often showed a very severe form of word blocking. In component of the reorganized functional system,
this syndrome non-verbal motor patterns were unaffected Other observations from an entirely different area have
and comprehension of grammatical statements was intact. also been adduced as evidence that the same function may
The lesion also.prevented the patient from reading or writing be accomplished by different functional systems, viz., from
unfamiliar words which had to be sounded-out, although studies of cognitive development in the child. In a very early
common words which would be recognized directly from study of counting, Luria noted that children of different ages
visual memory, or familiar words such as a signature, which counted in different ways. If they were instructed to count
he could write in one motion presented no problem. Again blocks arranged in a !lOW, no difference was detected. If the
the combination of symptoms with the inferotemporal lesion blocks were arranged to form a: cross, however, the younger
differed markedly from that seen with either of the previous children counted the block at the junction of the horizontal
two lesions. This Luria interpreted as evidence that a dif- and vertical columns twice. On the basis of this and numer-
ferent link in the functional system for word finding had ous similar experiments, Luria concluded that, at the earlier
been disrupted. age, the culturally determined functional system for counting
From a practical point of view, this approach has yielded had not yet developed; counting was done by a more primi-
diagnostic tools which Luria has used clinically since the tive form-bound functional system, so that the outcome was
early 1940's. In a theoretical sense, the evidence it yields has highly dependent upon environmental circumstances. At a
been taken to support the concept that functional systems later age a more complex functional system developed, which
involve constellations of cortical areas, damage to anyone allowed counting of a more abstract nature.
of which can disrupt the corresponding function. A third experiment showed not only that different func-
The thesis that the same function can be performed in tional systems can fulfill the same function, but also demon-
412 different ways implies that the different areas of the brain strated how such differences developed during learning and 413
the kinds of influence they could have on subsequent functional systems he wished to study in identical twins. In
performance (2). Five sets of identical twins participated in a other twin studies he has attempted to distinguish between
series of sessions with building blocks. One twin from each functional systems which are closely related to genotype
pair learned to reproduce model houses in which the building from ones which are not.
blocks were exposed to view. The other learned to reproduce One such study involved over 140 sets of twins who were
the same houses, but the models he had to work from were subjected to a number of different tasks (3). He found that
covered with paper, so that the ways in which blocks were in a simple visual recognition task, the variation in per-
stacked to obtain the overall form of the house were not formance was considerably less between identical twins than
exposed to view. After 10 weeks of training with different between fraternal twins. For a complex memorization task,
models, the two groups showed equal facility at reproducing on the other hand, the variation between identical twins
houses. There were marked differences, however, in their was as great as between fraternal twins. From this he
comprehension of grammatical statements regarding spatial concluded that the functional system responsible for per-
relationships, and 18 months later, they showed great diffe- formance in the recognition task was highly related to
rences in their ability to reconstruct from memory the models genotype, whereas that responsible for memorization was
which they had produced during tre training sessions. For related to past experience. Since past experience, was as
instance, the twins who had worked from models in which heterogeneous between identical twins as between fraternal
the individual blocks were hidden had less difficulty twins, variation in performance scores for the latter was
responding appropriately to the instruction, draw a circle taken to reflect a predominance of experiential over genetic
under a square and were considerably better at reconstruct- influences.
ing old models from memory. Luria's fourth major postulate, that the most important
In order to reproduce a model in which the relationships determinant of functional systems in man is the organization
between individual bricks were hidden from view, they had of his social environment follows directly from the postulate
first to analyze the general form of the structure and then that such systems are acquired rather than innate. One of
construct the form from blocks at hand. In the process a the studies which illustrates this principle most strikingly
functional system developed which had a different environ- involved a pair of identical twins, who, at age 5, showed
mental component than that evolved by the children who marked retardation in speech development (4). At the be-
had been shown the relationships between individual blocks. ginning of the study, the children shared a vocabulary of
The functional system they developed was more abstract less than 80 real words, and their speech reflected almost
and more powerful in that it rendered comprehension of no grammatical structure. They were enrolled in separate
related verbal statements and memory for spatial relations kindergartens and trained by adults who maximally
more effective. encouraged their use of speech in practical situations; one
Some of Luria's most fascinating studies have been of the twins received formal instruction in grammar as well.
designed to test the thesis that man's most effective functions For both twins, grammatical speech developed rapidly.
for dealing with his environment are acquired rather than They came to perform equally as well in most situations.
innate. In the experiment just described, he sought to They both developed narrative speech and verbal control
414 eliminate the genetic factor by elaborating the different over their behavior. In addition they developed constructive 415
play and the ability to draw from memory. These functions References
had been all but absent 11 months earlier. (1) Luria, A. R. (1963): Restoration of Function after Brain Injury,
In summary, the major finding was that identical twins trans. Haigh, B., (Macmillan, New York) (Eng),
(2) Luria, A. R. & Mirenova, A. N. (1936): Eksperimental'noe razvitie
living in a close symbiotic relationship and in an atmosphere
vospriiatiia metodom diferentsirovannogo obucheniia odnoiait-
of adult indifference did not develop grammatical speech, sevykh bliznetsov, sbornik Nevrologiia i Genetika (Development
the most basic of human functions. When they were of perception in identical twins with different training methods,
separated and exposed to. adults who encouraged or Neurology and Genetics (ed? pub?) (Russ).
demanded verbalization of perceptions, desires, intentions, (3) Luria, A. R. (1936): K voprosu 0 geneticheskom amalize psikholo-
etc., they rapidly developed speech. Luria concluded that gicheskikh funktsii v svyazi sikh razvitiem, Problemy Nervooi
Fiziologii i Povedeniia, sbornik., posvyasbchonnyi Prof. 1. S.
grammatical language and constructive thought processes, Beritashvili (Tblisi, Tekhnika da Shrorna) pp. 361-367.
even of a rudimentary nature do not develop in the absence (Genetic analysis of the development of psychological functions,
of social necessity or interaction with other humans who in Problems in Neural Physiology and Behavior, proceedings of
have already acquired language. a symposium hold in honor of 1. S. Beritashvili, issued under
Anyone familiar with the vast range of Prof. Luria's auspices of Georgian branch of Academy of Sciences of the USSR
(Tbilisi, Tekhnika da Shroma) pp 361-367) (Russ).
research interests will readily recognize that a number of (4) Luria, A. R. & Yodovich, F. la. (1959): Speech and the Development
large areas have been omitted from this discussion. His well- of Mental processes in the Child (Staples Press, London) (Eng),
informed interest in psychoanalysis during the 1920's (5,6), (Sproget og barnets udvikling, Munksgaard 1971).
and his own attempts at that time to analyze the influence of (5) Luria, A. R. (1923): Psikhoanaliz v Svete Osnovnykh Tendentsii
hidden affect on speech and thought processes:(7); his cross- Sovremennoi Psikhologii, 50 pp (Krasnyi Pechatnik, Kazan).
(Psychoanalysis in Light of Basic Tendencies of Modern Psycho-
cultural studies of speech in children from rural and urban
logy, 50 pp (Red Press, Kazan)) (Russ).
environments (8); and his studies of speech and thought in (6) Luria, A. R. (1926): Die moderne russische Physiologie und die
children with severe motor and mental handicaps (9) Psychoanalyse, Internationale Zeitschrijt filr Psychoanalyse, Bd.
represent decades of research which we can only mention XII, Heft 1, pp. 40-53 Ger).
here in passing. (7) Luria, A. R. (1932): The Nature of Human Conflicts (Liveright,
New York) trans. by W. Horsley Gantt from Russian edition
The major aim of this paper has been to point out several
which appeared in 1930) (Eng).
themes which are basic to virtually all of Prof. Luria's work. (8) Luria, A. R. (1930): Rechevye reaksii rebenka i sotsial'naia sreda,
Each passing year sees an increasing number of translations Rech' i InteHekt Derevenskogo, Gorodskogo, i Besprizornogo
of this man's important scientific contributions from Russian Rebenka, T. II, red. Luria, A. R. (Gosudarstvennoe Isdatel'stvo