.

:
-
.
. .
-
.
: , , , , , , ,
.

. ,
.
. . , ?

, .2
, , , .
, . ,
, ,
, , , .
.
, ,
. ,
, .
.
-.3
,
. , (. ,
, .),
, , , . , ,
. 4 , , , , , , ,

1
, : .
. , ,
.
2
`, ,
. , . ,
, 448. ... , `.
. , M, 980b.
3
. Pand = , n d m
t . panda, pandate : , ;
pand, pandajati , pand, pandati , .
and : , , ; panditah , , . pandita , , ,
; panditaka , , , . : Sanskrit-english dictionary, Monier Monier Wiliams, Indiyan
Institute, Oxford, 1889. , , , I-III, ,
, 2003.
4
"" "".
. , "", "",
, . , , 1980: 1141b 5.
1
, , , , , , .
, ,
.
.

, - , ,
. , ,
. (
,1978:41.) . (
,1978:42.) . ,
. 5 -, ,
, e
, - - .
, ,
. "", ""
. ,
. ,
, , .
- ,

. - ()
. ,
, , , , .
, , , . , ,
. .
, , , . ,
, , ,
. (-
), , , , , , , ,
, , .
. . ,
.
, .
.
: Vi-vli, -liyate , ( ), , , ,
, , , , , , (,
); , ; , , , , ; Vi-laya
, , , , , .6 , .

5
, ( ) ,
. : ,
. , , , , ,
, . , ,
, .
: , ;
; -; ; ();
, . :
. , , , 2001, . 50.
. .
, , ,
.
6
Sanskrit-english dictionary, Monier Monier Wiliams, . 985.
2
 , , ,
.
,
. -.
. ,
. -
, ,
, . - .

. - 7

.
. ,
- .
. .
, . ,
, -
, .
.
- . , , .
, . , ,
.
: ;
,
. , , ,
. . ,
, , ,
.8
, .
( )
.
.
. Rythms, . ,
. , ,
(, ). 9
.
()
.
, .
. , .
. ,
. .
? , ,
. , , ,

7
, matrix . , -mater ,
, . , . , ; (.
, ) .
8
P. Rosenstiehl, Labirinto, Enciclopedia Einaudi, tom VIII, Einaudi, Torino, 1979, . 7. : H. Kern, Labirinti, Feltrinelli,
Milano, 1993, . 13.
9
. . 112.
3
 , .
, .
, ,
. ,
. - -
, , , , , - ,
. ,
, , , , ,
, , . ( , 2002:9.) ,
?
. ? ,
. . , ,
(Ereignes). Ereignes - . -
- . , .

. . , --
. ,
.
. - -,

.
.
.
, . , , ,
, , .
. (fron-tiera, .)
, -, .
() .
, -
.
, , ,
. .
. . -
, .
: , , , .,
. .
, . ,
- .
.
.
, .
, .
. , .
.
. ( )

. ,
. ,
- ( ,
, .).
( ) , ,

4
 -
.
,
, ( )
, .
.
.
, .
(), . , ,
() ,
- .
, . ,
: ,
!10 ( )
, -,
- , . , ,
.
,
. .
, . ,
(Geschehen).
. : , , ,
, .
,
,
. (
) , , , , ,
( )
, , .
. , , .
.
, , , .
.
. ( )
, .
. , border, boundary,
frontier,
. ( , 2002:22-3.) ?

(- )
. ,
.

; , ,
- border frontier.
( , ,
, , 7. ,
) , .
.

10
, , , 1986, . 382.
5
 , ,
- -
.
.
. ( ) ,
,
.
.
.
, . , ,
, ,
. .
,
.
,
, , .
, , ,
. , , , ,
. , .

, . .
,
-
. .
. , -
( ), . ,
, . ,
. -
.
,
.
, .

- , : -, ,
- .
- . 11
. ,
. , , (
) -
. , .
, ,
() , .
(homo europeensis)
. (Peter
Rau, 2001-2002:28.) ,
--, , .

11
.
6
 ,
,12 .
, .
, .
, . . . ,
, , ,
, .
- , , ,
. ,
,
, .
,
, , ,
, , , .
.13 , -
- .

,
. , .

.14 , ,
, .
,
.
.
.
,
. (Peter Rau, 2001-2002:28.)
: ,
, .
.
. Nietzschea ,
, - , , :
, .(Peter Rau, 2001-2002:28.)

. . , , ,
, ,
. (Peter Rau, 2001-2002:29.)
. ,
, -
, . .
, . ,
12
, 17. 000 , .
I ,
, , "" .
"" .
13
.
,
.
. , , , , ,
1974, . 71.
14
, .
,1990:162.
7
, ,
, , ,
. (Peter Rau, 2001-2002:29.) -
- : , , , .
.
, ?
, . ,
, , ,
, , . .
,

.

. ,
, .
.
, . 15
, .
,
( )
.
. , ,
, , ,
.
(), . ,
,
.
( ), ,
, 16 ,
, .

Srboljub S. Dimitrijevi
The Faculty of Philosophy, Ni

Place Memory

Summary: Time and patience tact are necesseary for achieving a goal, however, not in resignation, but
in an active relation. Prejudices do not come into being only by declarative acceptance of tolerance in the
manner of reconcilable tact guided by place memory, but also by simultaneous disregard of the nature of
frontier space. Although the intention sometimes has questionable motives, we should keep reviving the only

15
, ,
. , 2002: 97.
16
. ,
, .
,
,
. ,

. , ,
, . 4. , , , 2005, . 213
8
real place (frontier) space of ours continuously causing both misunderstanding and understanding (which
eliminates being cocooned) and, on the boundary scene, we should perform various forms of being different.
With thus caused disorder, there is a probability of moving to a state of different reciprocal relationship.
Nevertheless, this calls for an intensive thinking about the very frontier, question of memory, time
reconstruction, earthly position of man, place memory and mark as something not yet thought out not only
an effort towards the enlightenment ideal of general education and universal matrixes at the dusk of
metaphysics, as the experience from the previosus century proves. We still do not think (Heidegger), we
metaphysically dream. It could be said that at the beginning of the new millennium we only take limiteid part in
somebody elses lives, thus reaching just an expanded world of facts not only as a superficialintellectual
approach, but as the most widely spread relationship. In this situation, it seems difficult (not to say impossible)
to declare, let alone to realize Husserls idea of true world as a synthetic unity of homeland worlds so
strong is place memory together with what it produces and what it is produced by.

.
,

Summary: ,
.
,
. ,
(
) .
. ,
, , ,
, , , ,
-
. (), . ,
,

. ( ),
,
, ,
, .

, 1978, , , .
, 1980, , , .
, 2002, , Clio, .
, 1982, , , .
Karl Jaspers, 1956, Philosophie, Erstes Buch: Philosophische Weltorientierung, Springer Verlag,
Berlin (Gttingem)Heideilberg, Bd. I.
Peter Rau, 2001-2002, Legenda o Balkanu u obzoru evropske filozofije velikih epskih formi, asopis
Novi izraz, br. 14-15, P.E.N. Bosne i Hrcegovine, Sarajevo.
, , , . 84, I-1990

9
10