Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effect of Relaxation and Guided Imagery Techniques on Cancer Patients Pain
Evonne Piazza
University of South Florida
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 2
Abstract
Clinical Problem: Cancer patients experience pain from either their medical treatment or their
Objective: Determine if relaxation and guided imagery techniques lower adult cancer patients
pain levels. PubMed and CINAHL were accessed to gather clinical trials and the guidelines
about using relaxation and guided imagery techniques to help reduce pain in cancer patients. The
key search terms used were relaxation and guided imagery techniques for pain, reducing pain in
cancer patients, and guided imagery and relaxation techniques for cancer patients pain.
Results: Research supports the use of guided imagery and relaxation techniques to reduce pain in
cancer patients.
Conclusion: Cancer patients that received relaxation and guided imagery techniques had a
reduced rate of pain. Participants overall quality of life increased in conjunction with guided
imagery and relaxation training. Further research is needed to determine which guided imagery
progressive phase cancer patients experience chronic pain. Due to the high prevalence of pain in
the cancer patient community, it is imperative to address their pain for the best recovery possible.
Prompt pain assessment and interventions are necessary to recognize and prevent pain during the
course of cancer treatment (Coyle 2006). In addition, a decreased quality of life has been
associated with pain in cancer patients (Niegisch, Retz, Siener, Albers 2016). Currently, there are
many different types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions like
relaxation and guided imagery that have been established to decrease cancer patients pain. The
effectiveness of guided imagery and relaxation techniques will be evaluated by the effect it has
on the cancer patients pain level . In adult cancer patients, does relaxation and guided imagery
compared to standard treatment decrease the patients pain over the course of cancer treatment?
Literature Search
PubMed and CINAHL were reviewed to gather guidelines and clinical trials about the
effects of relaxation and guided imagery techniques on adult cancer patients pain. The key
search terms used were relaxation and guided imagery techniques, decreasing pain in cancer
Literature Review
Chen, Whang, Yang, and Chung (2015) designed a randomized control trial to determine
the effects of guided imagery and relaxation on breast cancer patients. This study measured the
level of pain, insomnia, and depression in breast cancer patients. The hospital anxiety and
depression scale (HADS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used in this study to gather
data. Sixty-five adult breast cancer patients from Taiwan participated in this study. Thirty-three
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 4
of these patients were placed in the control group and the other 32 were placed in the
intervention group where they received guided imagery and relaxation training in addition to
their chemotherapy self-care education. Upon comparing both groups, statistically significant
differences were found in the overall symptom distress (B = 0.11,d P < 0.05), insomnia (B =
0.50, P < 0.05), depression (B = 0.38, P < 0.05), pain (B = 0.38, P < 0.05), and anxiety (B = 3.08,
P < 0.00). Strengths of this trial consisted of randomization of all subjects in either the control or
intervention group, details explaining why participants failed to finish the trial were given, a
suitable control group, the SDS was reliable and valid, and participants in both groups were
comparable on demographic and baseline clinical variables. One weakness of the study was that
the researchers were not blind to the control group. Another limitation was the study consisted of
only females. In addition, the HADS was proven to be valid but not reliable.
Syrjala, Donaldson, David, Kippes, and Carr (1995) designed a randomized control trial
to assess whether relaxation and guided imagery could minimize nausea, stress, and pain
associated with oral mucositis in cancer patients attaining bone marrow transplants. The visual
analog scale (VAS) was used to help gather data from the participants. Ninety-four patients
completed the study and were separated into 4 groups of treatment: traditional control, counselor
support, guided imagery and relaxation preparation, and education in a bundle of cognitive-
behavioral managing aids that encompassed guided imagery and relaxation. Participants within
the experimental groups indicated they experienced a considerably larger effectiveness of their
interventions for managing pain (t=3.18, P-0.002) and stress (t=3.3, P=0.001) when compared to
perceived effectiveness for coping with nausea. Patients addressed that these interventions did
provide helpfulness for managing pain which correlated with the VAS reports. Strengths of this
trial consisted of randomization of all subjects in either the control or intervention group,
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 5
participants and researchers were blind to the experimental group, the control group was suitable,
and details explaining why participants failed to finish the trial were given. One limitation for
this trial was that the randomization of participants was not withheld from the personnel
relaxation could be used to decrease pain in breast and gynecologic cancer patients who were in
the hospital receiving brachytherapy. The study measured the level of anxiety, depression, and
pain the cancer patients experienced while they were undergoing treatment in the hospital.
Researchers incorporated the HADS and VAS in this study. The sample size of this study
included 64 breast and gynecological cancer patients receiving brachytherapy. Thirty-two adults
participated in the control group and 34 adults were in the intervention group that were taught
relaxation and guided imagery techniques. Strengths in this study comprised of randomization of
all subjects in either the control or intervention group, random placement of participants was
withheld from the personnel initiating participants into the study, details explaining why
participants failed to finish the trial were given, the control group was suitable, and the VAS was
proven to be reliable and valid. One limitation of this study was that the HADS was proven to be
valid but not reliable. Another limitation was only women participated in the study.
psychological intervention, which included guided imagery and relaxation, could reduce post-
embolism pain during hepatic arterial chemoembolization treatment. Researchers used the
symptom chest list-90 (SCL-90) to analyze the mental, emotional, and cognitive state of the
participants prior to surgery. The numeric rating scale (NRS-10) was used to measure the
patients pain before and after surgery. There were a total of 262 patients who participated in this
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 6
trial. Forty-six participants were in the control group who only received analgesic medication
and 216 patients were receiving psychological intervention as well as medication. Results
showed that pain in both groups decreased after receiving analgesic medicine throughout the
surgery (P < 0.01). However, few patients exhibited partial or entire relief of pain after receiving
psychological interventions (29.17% and 2.31%). Results showed that the pain level in the
treatment group was considerably less after drug administration than the control group. Strengths
in this study encompassed randomization of all subjects in either the control or intervention
group and the control group was suitable. One limitation of this study was that no explanations
were given in regards to why some participants were not able to finish the study.
Synthesis
Chen et al. (2015) showed that adult breast cancer patients pain had significantly
decreased after receiving guided imagery and relaxation techniques (-0.28 0.58, P < 0.05). In
addition, Leon-Pizarro et al. (2007) found a reduction in pain in gynecological and breast cancer
patients undergoing brachytherapy who received guided imagery and relaxation training for thier
physical and psychological symptoms of breast cancer (p=0.04). Also, Syrjala et al. (1995)
reported that cancer patients with oral mucositis receiving bone marrow transplants along with
guided imagery and relaxation training reported a significant decrease in pain (t = 3.18, P =
0.002). Finally, Zi-Xuan Wang (2008) found that guided imagery and relaxation therapy was
successful in significantly decreasing pain in cancer patients who were receiving hepatic arterial
chemoembolization treatment.
To conclude, researchers agreed that guided imagery and relaxation techniques decrease
cancer patients level of pain (Chen et al. 2012; Leon-Pizarro et al. 2015; Syrjala et al. 1995; Zi-
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 7
Xuan Wang 2008). This research proves that guided imagery and relaxation techniques can
positively affect cancer patients pain levels, potentially improving their quality of life.
Clinical Recommendations
The randomized control trials demonstrated that patients who experience pain during
their cancer treatment should be given the option to participate in guided imagery and relaxation
training to reduce their levels of pain. In addition, guided imagery and relaxation techniques can
be used in combination with analgesic medication and other CAM interventions to potentially
further decrease the patients level of pain. Research confirms that guided imagery and relaxation
techniques have not only partially reduced or completely eradicated pain levels for patients, but
has also decreased other patient subjective symptoms such as: anxiety, insomnia, and depression.
Furthermore, nurses can utilize guided imagery and relaxation techniques to help reduce pain in
addition to other symptoms patients experience throughout their course of cancer. Now that
research has proven guided imagery and relaxation can help decrease pain in cancer patients,
further evidence based practice can use this information and further investigate which kinds of
relaxation and guided imagery works more effectively to decrease the pain.
THE EFFECTS OF RELAXATION AND GUIDED 8
References
Baker, T., OConnor, M., Krok, J. (2013). Experience and knowledge of pain management in
patients receiving outpatient cancer treatment: What do older saults really know about
Chen, S., Wang, H., Yang, B., Chung. (2015). Effect of relaxation with guided imagery on the
Coyle, N. (2006) Assessing cancer pain in the adult patient. Oncology, 20(10), 41-9.
Leon-Pizarro, C., Gich I., Barthe E., Rovirosa, A., Farrus, B., Casas, F., Verger, E., Biete, A.,
Craven-Bartle, J., Sierra, J., Arcusa, A. (2007). A randomized trial of the effect of training
10.1002/pon.1171
Niegisch, G., Retz, M., Siener, R., Albers, P. (2016). Quality of life in patients with cisplatin-
Syrjala, K., Donaldson, G., David, M., Kippes, M., Carr. (1995). Relaxation and imagery and