TP 1

LOCATION: 0427174E, 0559301N

TP 2
LOCATION: 0427150E, 0559291N

TP 3
LOCATION: 0427149E, 0559237N
APPENDIX A
 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
ASTM D422-63(2007)
Project Name: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE Tested By: FRIDAY Date: 28/01/2017
Location: CRUTECH Sample Depth (m): 4.8 - 5.6

Chainage GULLY MAT Test Number: 1

Weight of Wet Sample (g): 1000.0 Weight of Dry Sample (g): 775.0
Absolute Dry Weight (g): 920.0 Hydroscopic Moisture Content (%) 8.0

Soil Retained Soil Retained

Sieve Number Diameter (mm) Soil Passing (%)
(g) (%)

#4 4.75 0.0 0.0 100.0

#10 2.00 8.0 0.9 99.1
1.18 79.0 8.6 90.5
#20 0.85 245.0 26.6 63.9
#40 0.43 145.0 15.8 48.2
#60 0.25 150.0 16.3 31.8
0.21 54.0 5.9 26.0
0.15 47.0 5.1 20.9
#200 0.075 40.0 4.3 16.5
Pan 152.0 16.5 0.0
TOTAL: 920 100.0

#4 Coarse #10 Medium #40 Fine #200 SILT/CLAY

GRAVEL SAND SAND SAND
100

90Sieve Diameter % Passing % Passing

(mm)
80
4 4.75 100
70 10 2 100
% Passing

40 0.425 100
60 200 0.075 100
50 4 4.75 0
10 2 0
40 40 0.425 0
200 0.075 0
30

20

10

0
10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Particle Diameter (mm)
Grain Size Distribution Curve Results:
% Gravel: 0.0 D10: Cu:
% Sand: 83.5 D30: Cc:
% Fines: 16.5 D60:

TESTED BY: MR. FRIDAY SIGNATURE: .............................................

 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
ASTM D422-63(2007)
Project Name: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE Tested By: FRIDAY Date: 28/01/2017
Location: CRUTECH Sample Depth (m): 0.9 - 1.20
Chainage GULLY HEAD Test Number: 2

Weight of Wet Sample (g): 1000.0 Weight of Dry Sample (g): 730.0
Absolute Dry Weight (g): 920.0 Hydroscopic Moisture Content (%): 8.0

Mass of Sieve & Soil Retained

Sieve Number Diameter (mm) Soil Retained (%) Soil Passing (%)
Soil (g) (g)

#4 4.75 0.0 0.0 100.0

#10 2.00 3.0 0.3 99.7
1.18 39.0 4.2 95.4
#20 0.85 182.0 19.8 75.7
#40 0.43 138.0 15.0 60.7
#60 0.25 137.0 14.9 45.8
0.21 97.0 10.5 35.2
0.15 75.0 8.2 27.1
#200 0.075 54.0 5.9 21.2
Pan 195.0 21.2 0.0
TOTAL: 920 100.0
#4 Coarse #10 Medium #40 Fine #200 SILT/CLAY
GRAVEL SAND SAND SAND
100

Sieve
90 Diameter % Passing % Passing
(mm)
80
4 4.75 100
70 10 2 100
% Passing

40 0.425 100
60200 0.075 100
50 4 4.75 0
10 2 0
40 40 0.425 0
200 0.075 0
30

20

10

0
10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Particle Diameter (mm)
Grain Size Distribution Curve Results:
% Gravel: 0.0 D10: Cu:
% Sand: 78.8 D30: Cc:
% Fines: 21.2 D60:

TESTED BY: MR. FRIDAY SIGNATURE: ...................................................................

 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
ASTM D422-63(2007)
Project Name: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE Tested By: FRIDAY Date: 28/01/2017
Location: CRUTECH Sample Depth (m): 0.9 - 1.20
Chainage GULLY BANK Test Number: 3
Weight of Wet Sample (g): 1000.0 Weight of Dry Sample (g): 700.0
Absolute Dry Weight (g): 880.0 Hydroscopic Moisture Content (%): 12.0

Soil Soil
Diameter Soil Passing
Sieve Number Retained Retained
(mm) (%)
(g) (%)
#4 4.75 0.0 0.0 100.0
#10 2.00 3.0 0.3 99.7
1.18 54.0 6.1 93.5
#20 0.85 255.0 29.0 64.5
#40 0.43 141.0 16.0 48.5
#60 0.25 101.0 11.5 37.0
0.21 63.0 7.2 29.9
0.15 49.0 5.6 24.3
#200 0.075 30.0 3.4 20.9
Pan 184.0 20.9 0.0
TOTAL: 880 100.0

#4 Coarse #10 Medium #40 Fine #200 SILT/CLAY

GRAVEL SAND SAND SAND
100

Sieve
90 Diameter % Passing % Passing
(mm)
80
4 4.75 100
7010 2 100
% Passing

40 0.425 100
60
200 0.075 100
504 4.75 0
10 2 0
4040 0.425 0
200 0.075 0
30

20

10

0
10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Particle Diameter (mm)
Grain Size Distribution Curve
% Gravel: 0.0 D10: Cu:
% Sand: 79.1 D30: Cc:
% Fines: 20.9 D60:

TESTED BY: MR. FRIDAY SIGNATURE

APPENDIX B
 QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT
CRUTECH

DRY DENSITY/MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP

SOURCE OF MATERIAL: ENIMA OMIN TEST DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

LOCATION SAMPLED: GULLY MAT DATE SAMPLED: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

No. of Layers: 5 Blows Per Layer: 25 Wt. Of Hammer, kg: 4.5

Diameter of Mold Height Volume 2305

WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION

Moisture Can No. 3 20 14 19 9 21 4 18 6 22
Wt. of Can + Wet soil, gm 65.00 73.00 75.00 67.00 83.00 65.00 68.00 57.00 67.00 77.00
Wt. of Can + Dry soil, gm 62.00 69.00 70.00 62.00 76.00 60.00 60.00 52.00 58.00 65.00
Wt. of Water, gm 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 5.00 8.00 5.00 9.00 12.00
Wt. of Can, gm 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.00
Wt. of Dry soil, gm 53.00 60.00 61.00 53.00 67.00 51.00 51.00 43.00 49.00 55.00
Water Content, % 5.7 6.7 8.2 9.4 10.4 9.8 15.7 11.6 18.4 21.8
Average Water Content, % 6.2 8.8 13.7 20.1
DENSITY DETERMINATION
Wt of Soil + Mold, gm 8718 9321 9738 9612 8951
Wt of Mold, gm 4704 4704 4704 4704 4704
Wt of Soil in Mold, gm 4014 4617 5034 4908 4247
3
Wet Density, gm/cm 1.741 2.003 2.184 2.129 1.843
3
Dry Density gm/cm 1.64 1.84 2.18 1.87 1.53

2.10

2.00
DRY DENSITY, g/cm

1.90

1.80

1.70

1.60

1.50

5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

MOISTURE, %

Optimum Moisture Content 12 % Max. Dry Density 1.91 g/cm

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name:. name: Emma name:
position: position: position:

signature: signature:.. signature:

date: date:... date:
 QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT
CRUTECH

DRY DENSITY/MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP

SOURCE OF MATERIAL: ENIMA OMIN TEST DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

LOCATION SAMPLED: GULLY MAT DATE SAMPLED: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

No. of Layers: 5 Blows Per Layer: 25 Wt. Of Hammer, kg: 4.5

Diameter of Mold Height Volume 2305

WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION

Moisture Can No. 3 20 14 19 9 21 4 18 6 22
Wt. of Can + Wet soil, gm 71.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 76.00 77.00 80.00 62.00 71.00 72.00
Wt. of Can + Dry soil, gm 66.00 63.00 63.00 62.00 66.00 67.00 69.00 53.00 59.00 60.00
Wt. of Water, gm 5.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 9.00 12.00 12.00
Wt. of Can, gm 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Wt. of Dry soil, gm 57.00 54.00 54.00 53.00 56.00 58.00 60.00 44.00 50.00 51.00
Water Content, % 8.8 13.0 13.0 15.1 17.9 17.2 18.3 20.5 24.0 23.5
Average Water Content, % 10.9 14.0 19.4 23.8
DENSITY DETERMINATION
Wt of Soil + Mold, gm 8456 8838 9223 9610 9576
Wt of Mold, gm 4704 4704 4704 4704 4704
Wt of Soil in Mold, gm 3752 4134 4519 4906 4872
3
Wet Density, gm/cm 1.628 1.793 1.961 2.128 2.114
3
Dry Density gm/cm 1.47 1.57 1.96 1.78 1.71

2.10

2.00
DRY DENSITY, g/cm

1.90

1.80

1.70

1.60

1.50

1.40

5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

MOISTURE, %

Optimum Moisture Content 21 % Max. Dry Density 1.8 g/cm

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name:. name: Emma name:
position: position: position:

signature: signature:.. signature:

date: date:... date:
 QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT
CRUTECH

DRY DENSITY/MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP

SOURCE OF MATERIAL: ENIMA OMIN TEST DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

LOCATION SAMPLED: GULLY MAT DATE SAMPLED: 24TH JANUARY, 2017

No. of Layers: 5 Blows Per Layer: 25 Wt. Of Hammer, kg: 4.5

Diameter of Mold Height Volume 2305

WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION

Moisture Can No. 3 20 14 19 9 21 4 18 6 22
Wt. of Can + Wet soil, gm 78.00 51.00 79.00 62.00 52.00 52.00 65.00 56.00 57.00 64.00
Wt. of Can + Dry soil, gm 74.00 48.00 73.00 58.00 48.00 48.00 59.00 50.00 50.00 56.00
Wt. of Water, gm 4.00 3.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 8.00
Wt. of Can, gm 8.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.00
Wt. of Dry soil, gm 66.00 39.00 64.00 48.00 39.00 39.00 51.00 41.00 41.00 48.00
Water Content, % 6.1 7.7 9.4 8.3 10.3 10.3 11.8 14.6 17.1 16.7
Average Water Content, % 6.9 8.9 13.2 16.9
DENSITY DETERMINATION
Wt of Soil + Mold, gm 8668 9009 9516 9375 9090
Wt of Mold, gm 4704 4704 4704 4704 4704
Wt of Soil in Mold, gm 3964 4305 4812 4671 4386
3
Wet Density, gm/cm 1.720 1.868 2.088 2.026 1.903
3
Dry Density gm/cm 1.61 1.72 2.09 1.79 1.63

2.10

2.00
DRY DENSITY, g/cm

1.90

1.80

1.70

1.60

1.50

1.40

5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

MOISTURE, %
Optimum Moisture Content 12.5 % Max. Dry Density 1.8 g/cm

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name:. name: name:
position: position: position:

signature: signature:.. signature:

date: date:... date:
APPENDIX C
 LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX OF
SOILS
Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION
NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 27TH JAN, 2017
material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1
SPECIFIED TEST CRITERIA
Weight balance accuracy readable to +/- 0.01 gm
min. Mass of test Portion Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Passing seive 425m Seive 150 to 200 gm approx.20 gm
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS OF SOIL
Type of test: LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Test No: 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of blowws: 12 21 33 50
Container No: 22 19 20 4 21 24
weight of container 10 9 9 9 39 37
Wt of wet soil + Container (gm) 62 58 60 59 34 33
Wt of dry soil + Container (gm) 50 47 49 49 29 29
weight of Moisture (A) (gm) 12 11 11 10 5 4
Weight of dry soil (B) 40 38 40 40 25 24
Moisture content (A/B*100) % 30.00 28.95 27.50 25.00 20.00 16.67

Test results specification accept reject

Liquid Limit LL 28
Plastic Limit PL 18
Plasticity index PI 10

50.00

45.00
MOISTURE CONTENT %

40.00

35.00

30.00

25.00

20.00
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
NUMBER OF BLOWS

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE:

 LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX OF
SOILS
Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION
NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 27TH JAN, 2017

material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1
SPECIFIED TEST CRITERIA
Weight balance accuracy readable to +/- 0.01 gm
min. Mass of test Portion Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Passing seive 425m Seive 150 to 200 gm approx.20 gm
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS OF SOIL
Type of test: LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Test No: 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of blowws: 16 30 40 50
Container No: I A8 I4 D1 I9 AK
weight of container 9 10 9 9 9 9
Wt of wet soil + Container (gm) 55 55 56 50 39 39
Wt of dry soil + Container (gm) 43 44 45 41 34 34
weight of Moisture (A) (gm) 12 11 11 9 5 5
Weight of dry soil (B) 34 34 36 32 25 25
Moisture content (A/B*100) % 35.29 32.35 30.56 28.13 20.00 20.00

Test results specification accept reject

Liquid Limit LL 32
Plastic Limit PL 20
Plasticity index PI 12

50.00

45.00
MOISTURE CONTENT %

40.00

35.00

30.00

25.00

20.00
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
NUMBER OF BLOWS

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE:

 LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX OF
SOILS

Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION

NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 27TH JAN, 2017
material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1
SPECIFIED TEST CRITERIA
Weight balance accuracy readable to +/- 0.01 gm
min. Mass of test Portion Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Passing seive 425m Seive 150 to 200 gm approx.20 gm
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS OF SOIL
Type of test: LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Test No: 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of blowws: 13 18 30 50
Container No: AV ND PQ ST BB 3C
weight of container 8 9 9 9 9 9
Wt of wet soil + Container (gm) 60 57 58 58 38 38
Wt of dry soil + Container (gm) 48 46 47 48 33 34
weight of Moisture (A) (gm) 12 11 11 10 5 4
Weight of dry soil (B) 40 37 38 39 24 25
Moisture content (A/B*100) % 30.00 29.73 28.95 25.64 20.83 16.00

Test results specification accept reject

Liquid Limit LL 29
Plastic Limit PL 18
Plasticity index PI 10

50.00
MOISTURE CONTENT %

45.00

40.00

35.00

30.00

25.00

20.00
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
NUMBER OF BLOWS

Engineer representative: Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE: NAME & SIGNATURE:

APPENDIX D
 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TEST (DCPT)

Client NEWMAP Cross river State

Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator Friday
Date 07/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE TP1
NO: DEPTH 1.5
NORMAL
Job Ref 1 STRESS 6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR
STRESS 29 34 39

Wt. Of Area of Vol. of Bulk Vertical Normal Dial Shear

Sample No Sample Sample Sample Density Dry density Strain Stress Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 1713 1302 0 6.23 124 0.11 29

109.3 0.0038 6E - 05

B 1624 1243 0 12.70 150 0.13 34

113.2 0.0038 6E - 05

1542 1432 0 26.00 165 0.15 39

C 104.1 0.0038 6E - 05

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 1.5 SAMPLE: CLAYEY SILTY SAND

PRF: 0.000822 20mm UNDISTURED

0.423 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1626 kg/m3 m.def 0.0000
Water Content: 16.9
6.10
DRY DENSITY 1326 kg/m3

DEGREE OF
SATURATION 24.76%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.81 CU 26.54 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.81 27.11 DEGREE

DRAINED

50

40 y = 0.512x + 26.54
R = 0.961

30
SHEAR STRESS

20

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
NORMAL STRESS
 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TEST (DCPT)

Client NEWMAP Cross river State

Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator Friday
Date 07/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH 1.5
Job Ref 2 NORMAL STRESS 6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR STRESS 8 11 16

Area of Vol. of Bulk Dry Vertical Shear

Sample No Wt. Of Sample Sample Sample Density density Strain Normal Stress Dial Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 107.4 0.0038 6E - 05 1701 1543 0 6.23 65 0.03 8

B 102.6 0.0038 6E - 05 1654.0 1598 0 13 86 0.04 11

109.3 0.0038 6E - 05 1506.0 1587 0 26 114 0.06 16

C

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 1.5 SAMPLE: CLAYEYSAND

PRF: 0.000822 UNDISTURED
0.4324 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1620 KG/M3 m.def 0.000000
Water Content: 16.9 6

DRY DENSITY 1576 KG/M3

DEGREE OF
SATURATION 20.34%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.77 CU 5.43 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.77 21.70 DEGREE

UNDRAINED

30

25

20
SHEAR STRESS

y = 0.398x + 5.430
15 R = 1

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
NORMAL STRESS

#
 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TEST (DCPT)

Client NEWMAP Cross river State

Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator john
Date 07/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE NO:
TP2 DEPTH 1.5
NORMAL
Job Ref 3 STRESS 6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR
STRESS 21 26 32

Wt. Of Area of Vol. of Bulk Normal Dial Shear

Sample No Sample Sample Sample Density Dry density Vertical Strain Stress Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 1436 1403 0 6.23 79 0.08 21

123.4 0.0038 6E - 05

B 1369 1523 0 13 110 0.10 26

134,32 0.0038 6E - 05

1501 1543 0 26 140 0.12 32

C 131,54 0.0038 6E - 05

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 1.5 SAMPLE: CLAYEYSAND

PRF: 0.000822 UNDISTURED
0.6785 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1435 m.def 0.000000
Water Content: 16.9 7
DRY
DENSITY 1490

DEGREE OF
SATURATIO
N 34.88%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.55 CU 18.54 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.57 27.11 DEGREE

DRAINED

35

y = 0.512x + 18.64
R = 0.961
30

25
SHEAR STRESS

20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
NORMAL STRESS
 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TEST (DCPT)

Client NEWMAP Cross river State

Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator Friday
Date 08/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE NO: TP2 DEPTH 1.5
Job Ref 4 NORMAL STRESS 6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR STRESS 5 8 11

Wt. Of Area of Vol. of Bulk Dry Shear

Sample No Sample Sample Sample Density density Vertical Strain Normal Stress Dial Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 1456 1453 0 6.23 19 0.02 5

123.2 0.0038 6E - 05

B 1432.0 1501 0.36 13 38 0.03 8

129.8 0.0038 6E - 05

1432.0 1450 2.10 26 50 0.04 11

C 136.2 0.0038 6E - 05

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 1.5 SAMPLE: CLAYEYSAND

PRF: 0.000822 20mm UNDISTURED
0.3456 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1440 KG/M3 m.def 0.126667
Water Content: 16.915

DRY DENSITY 1468 KG/M3

DEGREE OF
SATURATION 29.11%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.98 CU 4.06 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.96 22.88 DEGREE

UNDRAINED

30

25

20
SHEAR STRESS

15

y = 0.256x + 4.060
10 R = 0.961

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
NORMAL STRESS

#
Client NEWMAP Cross river State
Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator John
Date 07/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE NO:
TP3 DEPTH 1.5
Job Ref 5 NORMAL STRESS
6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR STRESS 18 21 27

Area of Vol. of Bulk Dry Vertical Shear

Sample No Wt. Of Sample Sample Sample Density density Strain Normal Stress Dial Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 1563 1564 0 6.23 75 0.07 18

127.4 0.0038 6E - 05

B 1721.3 1456 0 13 93 0.08 21

140.3 0.0038 6E - 05

1607.2 1555 0 26 124 0.10 27

C 131 0.0038 6E - 05

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 1.5 SAMPLE: SILTY CLAYEYSAND

PRF: 0.000822 20MM UNDISTURED
0.6785 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1630 KG/M3 m.def 0.000000
Water Content: 16.9
11.30

DRY DENSITY 1525 KG/M3

DEGREE OF
SATURATION 37.88%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.73 CU 15.57 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.73 23.79 DEGREE

DRAINED

30

y = 0.441x + 15.57
R = 0.999
25

20
SHEAR STRESS

15

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
NORMAL STRESS
 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TEST (DCPT)

Client NEWMAP Cross river State

Project Geotechnical Investigation
Location Enima Omin Gully Site
Operator Friday
Date 07/02/2017
Test DIRECT SHEAR BOX TEST BOREHOLE NO: TP3 DEPTH 1.5
Job Ref 6 NORMAL STRESS 6.23 12.7 26
SHEAR STRESS 9 13 21

Wt. Of Area of Vol. of Bulk Dry Vertical Shear

Sample No Sample Sample Sample Density density Strain Normal Stress Dial Guage Load Stress

(grms) (m2) (m3) (Kg/m3)) % (mm) (KN/m2) (KN) (KN/m2)

A 139.2 0.0038 6E - 05 1954 1611 0 6.23 35 0.04 9

B 135.4 0.0038 6E - 05 1888.0 1557 0 12.70 54 0.05 13

136,7 0.0038 6E - 05 1902.0 1568 1.43 26.00 76 0.07 21

C

PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY SITE

BOREHOLE NO: TP1 DEPTH: 2.5 SAMPLE: SILTY CLAYEYSAND

PRF: 0.000822 20MM UNDISTURED
0.6785 SIZE: 60MM

BULK
DENSITY 1896 kg/m3 m.def 0.000000
Water Content: 16.926

DRY DENSITY 1479 kg/m3

DEGREE OF
SATURATION 92.77%

1
INITIAL VOID 0.78 CU 5.33 KN/M2
FINAL VOID 0.78 31.13 DEGREE

UNDRAINED

25

y = 0.604x + 5.334
R = 0.999
20

15
SHEAR STRESS

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
NORMAL STRESS
APPENDIX E
CRUTECH LABORATORY

DATE: MARCH, 2017

CONSOLIDATION TEST
PROJECT NO : TP 001
PROJECT : ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SAMPLE NO : SN001
POSITION: GULLY MAT
INITIAL DIAL 12 mm
RING DIAMETER = 74 mm
H1 = 20 mm OEDOMETER NO : 1
HS = 12.77 mm BEAM RATIO : 11

BEAM PRESSURE DIAL UNCORRECTED MACHINE CORRECTED HEIGHT VOID

LOAD READING DEFLECTION CORRECTION DEFLECTION CHANGE RATIO
(kg) (Kpa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0.0 0.00 12.000 12.000 0.000 0 20.000 0.5662

1.50 40.00 11.660 0.340 0.001 0.339 19.661 0.5396
3.00 80.00 11.470 0.530 0.005 0.525 19.475 0.5251
6.00 160.00 11.240 0.760 0.005 0.755 19.245 0.5070
12.0 320.00 10.880 1.120 0.011 1.109 18.891 0.4793
24.0 640.00 10.450 1.550 0.013 1.537 18.463 0.4458

SUMMARY

Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv M 2 /YR 5.2092 X 10 -03

Compression Index, Cc 0.1049

Coefficient of Compressibility,
Av M 2 /KN 1.2675 X 10 -04

Permeability, K CM/SEC 4.2141 X 10 -07

Oedometer Modulus,
E1 KN/M 2 866.830
Cofficient of Volume
-05
Compressibility, Mv M 2 /KN 8.0897 X 10

COMPRESS COEFFICIENT OEDOMETRIC

1
INDEX, CC OF CONSOL, CV MODULUS, E
M2/YR KN/M2
0.0 0.00 0.000
4.91E-02 8,81E-03 56.62
6.01E-02 6.91E-03 57.82
9.37E-02 5.87E-03 118.18
0.1116 2.87E-03 244.48
- 1.59E-03 511.99
PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY PROJECT NO : TP 001
SAMPLE NO : SN001
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION : SANDY CLAY
STATE OF SAMPLE: REMOULDED
DRY DENSITY = 1627 Kg/m3
INITIAL SATURATION = 74.56 %
INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT
= 16.60 %
INITIAL VOID RATIO = 0.5668

SPECIFIC GRAVITY (est) = 2.55

FINAL SATURATION = 83.43 %
FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT = 14.6 %
FINAL VOID RATIO = 0.4454

0.6000

0.5800

0.5600

0.5400
VOID RATIO

0.5200

0.5000

0.4800

0.4600

0.4400
1 10 EFFECTIVE 100
NORMAL STRESS (kPa) 1000 10000
CRUTECH LABORATORY

DATE: MARCH, 2017

CONSOLIDATION TEST
PROJECT NO : TP 002
PROJECT : ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SAMPLE NO : SN002
POSITION: GULLY BANK
INITIAL DIAL 11 mm
RING DIAMETER = 74 mm
H1 = 20 mm OEDOMETER NO : 2
HS = 13.03 mm BEAM RATIO : 11

BEAM PRESSURE DIAL UNCORRECTED MACHINE CORRECTED HEIGHT VOID

LOAD READING DEFLECTION CORRECTION DEFLECTION CHANGE RATIO
(kg) (Kpa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0.0 0.00 11.000 11.000 0.000 0 20.000 0.5349

1.50 40.00 10.670 0.330 0.001 0.329 19.671 0.5097
3.00 80.00 10.500 0.500 0.005 0.495 19.505 0.4969
6.00 160.00 10.330 0.670 0.005 0.665 19.335 0.4839
12.0 320.00 9.820 1.180 0.002 1.178 18.822 0.4445
24.0 640.00 9.220 1.780 0.003 1.777 18.223 0.3985

SUMMARY

Coefficient of Consolidation,Cv M 2 /YR 3.7432 X 10 -03

Compression Index, Cc 0.1233

Coefficient of Compressibility,
AV M 2 /KN 1.4899 X 10 -04

Permeability, K CM/SEC 3.6322 X 10 -07

Oedometer Modulus,
E1 KN/M 2 920.930
Cofficient of Volume
-05
Compressibility, Mv M 2 /KN 9.7062 X 10

COMPRESS COEFFICIENT OEDOMETRIC

1
INDEX, CC OF CONSOL, CV MODULUS, E
M2/YR KN/M2
0.0 0.00 0.000
4.32E-02 6.78E-03 58.77
4.35E-02 5.82E-03 60
1.30E-02 3.86E-03 122.14
0.1532 1.60E-03 255.77
- 1.59E-03 548.39
PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY PROJECT NO : TP 002
SAMPLE NO : SN002
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION : SILTY SAND
STATE OF SAMPLE: REMOULDED
DRY DENSITY = 1661 Kg/m3
INITIAL SATURATION = 70.04 %
INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT
= 21.00 %
INITIAL VOID RATIO = 0.5350

SPECIFIC GRAVITY (est) = 2.55

FINAL SATURATION = 83.76 %
FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT = 14.7 %
FINAL VOID RATIO = 0.3984

0.5500

0.5300

0.5100

0.4900

0.4700
VOID RATIO

0.4500

0.4300

0.4100

0.3900

0.3700

0.3500
1 10 100 1000 10000

EFFECTIVE NORMAL STRESS (kPa)

CRUTECH LABORATORY

DATE: MARCH, 2017

CONSOLIDATION TEST
PROJECT NO : TP 003
PROJECT : ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SAMPLE NO : SN003
POSITION: FLOOD PLAIN
INITIAL DIAL 20 mm
RING DIAMETER = 69 mm
H1 = 20 mm OEDOMETER NO : 3
HS = 10.8 mm BEAM RATIO : 11

BEAM PRESSURE DIAL UNCORRECTED MACHINE CORRECTED HEIGHT VOID

LOAD READING DEFLECTION CORRECTION DEFLECTION CHANGE RATIO
(kg) (Kpa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0.0 0.0 20.000 20.000 0.000 0 20.000 0.8519

1.50 40.0 15.830 4.170 0.001 4.169 15.831 0.4658
3.00 80.0 14.670 5.330 0.005 5.325 14.675 0.3588
6.00 160.0 13.230 6.770 0.005 6.765 13.235 0.2255
12.0 320.0 12.550 7.450 0.002 7.448 12.552 0.1622
24.0 640.0 11.740 8.260 0.003 8.257 11.743 0.0873

SUMMARY

Coefficient of Consolidation,Cv M 2 /YR 5.896 X 10 -03

Compression Index, Cc 0.3776

Coefficient of Compressibility,
AV M 2 /KN 5.0689 X 10 -04

Permeability, K CM/SEC 4.941 X 10 -08

Oedometer Modulus,
E1 KN/M 2 1061.640
Cofficient of Volume
-04
Compressibility, Mv M 2 /KN 2.4643 X 10

COMPRESS COEFFICIENT OEDOMETRIC

1
INDEX, CC OF CONSOL, CV MODULUS, E
M2/YR KN/M2
0.0 0.00 0.000
3.57E-01 1.07E-04 56.22
4.43E-01 5.58E-05 71.13
2.09E-01 5.75E-05 186.22
0.1236 3.95E-05 506.24
- 3.25E-05 1492.26
PROJECT: ENIMA OMIN GULLY PROJECT NO : TP 003
SAMPLE NO : SN003
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION : SANDY CLAY
STATE OF SAMPLE: REMOULDED
DRY DENSITY = 1443 Kg/m3
INITIAL SATURATION = 114.82 %
INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT
= 36.60 %
INITIAL VOID RATIO = 0.8520

SPECIFIC GRAVITY (est) = 2.65

FINAL SATURATION = 412.39 %
FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT = 22.2 %
FINAL VOID RATIO = 0.0871

0.5500

0.5000

0.4500

0.4000

0.3500
VOID RATIO

0.3000

0.2500

0.2000

0.1500

0.1000

0.0500
1 10 100 1000 10000

EFFECTIVE NORMAL STRESS (kPa)

APPENDIX F
Spread Sheet Solution for Slope Stability Analysis
Using Fellenius and Simplified Bishop Methods Construction Case Coordinate 0427174E, 0559301N
Height of Slope(m) 10m a = 25
w= Fellenius Method Simplified
SImplified
Bishop
Bishop
Method
Method
10 F.S. = 2.758 F.S. = 2.761 F.S. = 2.761
Slice Area Width H1 H2 Gt Wt c (deg.) (deg.) Hw cXl N tan Wsin ma Numer. ma Numer. ma Numer.
1 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 0.00 1.20 13.2 18.5 26.54 27.1 8.1 0.00 62.46 9.35 2.60 1.016 70.15 1.016 70.15 1.016 70.15
2 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 1.20 2.40 13.2 55.4 26.54 27.1 12.2 0.00 63.27 27.69 11.70 1.017 88.69 1.017 88.70 1.017 88.70
3 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 2.40 3.60 13.2 92.3 26.54 27.1 15.8 0.00 64.27 45.43 25.12 1.013 107.68 1.013 107.69 1.013 107.69
4 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 3.60 4.60 13.2 126.1 26.54 27.1 18.8 0.00 65.32 61.09 40.64 1.006 125.56 1.006 125.57 1.006 125.57
5 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.60 4.90 13.2 146.1 26.54 27.1 25.8 0.00 68.68 67.31 63.58 0.981 139.23 0.981 139.24 0.981 139.24
6 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.90 4.90 13.2 150.7 26.54 27.1 33.8 0.00 74.42 64.08 83.84 0.934 148.75 0.934 148.76 0.934 148.76
7 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.90 3.40 13.2 127.6 26.54 27.1 41.0 0.00 81.94 49.29 83.74 0.876 145.08 0.876 145.10 0.876 145.10
8 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 3.40 2.30 13.2 87.7 26.54 27.1 47.0 0.00 90.67 30.59 64.11 0.818 130.48 0.818 130.50 0.818 130.50
9 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 2.30 1.00 13.2 50.7 26.54 27.1 54.2 0.00 105.71 15.19 41.16 0.735 119.39 0.735 119.42 0.735 119.42
10 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 1.00 0.00 13.2 15.4 26.54 27.1 63.0 0.00 136.21 3.57 13.70 0.619 112.56 0.619 112.59 0.619 112.59

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (4)

Sum 870.4 812.95 373.60 430.18 1187.58 1187.71 1187.72
F.S. = (1)+(2)]/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3)
F.S. = 2.758 F.S.= 2.761 F.S.= 2.761 F.S.= 2.761
Spread Sheet Solution for Slope Stability Analysis
Using Fellenius and Simplified Bishop Methods Construction Case Coordinate 0427174E, 0559301N
Height of Slope(m) 10m a = 25
w= Fellenius Method Simplified
SImplified
Bishop
Bishop
Method
Method
10 F.S. = 1.062 F.S. = 1.089 F.S. = 1.093
Slice Area Width H1 H2 Gt Wt c (deg.) (deg.) Hw cXl N tan Wsin ma Numer. ma Numer. ma Numer.
1 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 0.00 1.20 13.2 18.5 5.43 21.7 8.1 0.00 12.78 7.27 2.60 1.043 19.17 1.041 19.20 1.041 19.20
2 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 1.20 2.40 13.2 55.4 5.43 21.7 12.2 0.00 12.94 21.53 11.70 1.057 32.82 1.055 32.89 1.054 32.89
3 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 2.40 3.60 13.2 92.3 5.43 21.7 15.8 0.00 13.15 35.33 25.12 1.064 46.39 1.062 46.50 1.061 46.51
4 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 3.60 4.60 13.2 126.1 5.43 21.7 18.8 0.00 13.36 47.50 40.64 1.067 58.86 1.064 59.03 1.064 59.05
5 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.60 4.90 13.2 146.1 5.43 21.7 25.8 0.00 14.05 52.34 63.58 1.063 66.57 1.059 66.83 1.059 66.86
6 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.90 4.90 13.2 150.7 5.43 21.7 33.8 0.00 15.23 49.84 83.84 1.039 69.87 1.034 70.22 1.034 70.26
7 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 4.90 3.40 13.2 127.6 5.43 21.7 41.0 0.00 16.76 38.33 83.74 1.001 63.41 0.994 63.81 0.994 63.85
8 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 3.40 2.30 13.2 87.7 5.43 21.7 47.0 0.00 18.55 23.79 64.11 0.956 49.72 0.949 50.08 0.948 50.12
9 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 2.30 1.00 13.2 50.7 5.43 21.7 54.2 0.00 21.63 11.81 41.16 0.889 36.95 0.881 37.27 0.880 37.31
10 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 2.33 1.00 0.00 13.2 15.4 5.43 21.7 63.0 0.00 27.87 2.78 13.70 0.788 23.83 0.779 24.08 0.779 24.11

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (4)

Sum 870.4 166.33 290.53 430.18 467.60 469.91 470.18
F.S. = (1)+(2)]/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3)
F.S. = 1.062 F.S.= 1.087 F.S.= 1.092 F.S.= 1.093
Spread Sheet Solution for Slope Stability Analysis
Using Fellenius and Simplified Bishop Methods Construction Case Coordinate 0427150E, 0559291N
Height of Slope(m) 13 a = 32
w= Fellenius Method Simplified
SImplified
Bishop
Bishop
Method
Method
10 F.S. = 2.990 F.S. = 3.040 F.S. = 3.039
Slice Area Width H1 H2 Gt Wt c (deg.) (deg.) Hw cXl N tan Wsin ma Numer. ma Numer. ma Numer.
1 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 0.00 0.52 14.4 6.6 18.54 27.1 4.6 0.00 32.55 3.34 0.53 1.011 35.43 1.010 35.43 1.010 35.43
2 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 0.52 1.25 14.4 22.3 18.54 27.1 8.2 0.00 32.78 11.30 3.18 1.014 43.25 1.014 43.27 1.014 43.27
3 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 1.25 1.63 14.4 36.3 18.54 27.1 11.2 0.00 33.07 18.22 7.05 1.014 50.31 1.014 50.33 1.014 50.33
4 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 1.63 2.42 14.4 51.0 18.54 27.1 13.5 0.00 33.37 25.40 11.91 1.012 57.86 1.012 57.89 1.012 57.89
5 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 2.42 2.90 14.4 67.0 18.54 27.1 19.5 0.00 34.42 32.35 22.38 1.000 66.77 0.999 66.84 0.999 66.84
6 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 2.90 2.90 14.4 73.1 18.54 27.1 26.1 0.00 36.13 33.60 32.15 0.973 71.77 0.972 71.86 0.972 71.86
7 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 2.90 2.90 14.4 73.1 18.54 27.1 32.0 0.00 38.26 31.73 38.73 0.939 74.41 0.937 74.53 0.937 74.53
8 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 2.90 2.00 14.4 61.7 18.54 27.1 37.0 0.00 40.63 25.24 37.16 0.902 71.04 0.900 71.17 0.900 71.17
9 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 2.00 1.24 14.4 40.8 18.54 27.1 42.9 0.00 44.29 15.31 27.79 0.849 62.82 0.847 62.97 0.847 62.97
10 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.75 1.24 0.00 14.4 15.6 18.54 27.1 46.5 0.00 47.13 5.51 11.33 0.813 49.77 0.811 49.90 0.811 49.90

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (4)

Sum 447.6 372.63 202.00 192.20 583.43 584.20 584.19
F.S. = (1)+(2)]/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3)
F.S. = 2.990 F.S.= 3.036 F.S.= 3.040 F.S.= 3.040
Spread Sheet Solution for Slope Stability Analysis
Using Fellenius and Simplified Bishop Methods Construction Case Coordinate 0427150E, 0559291N
Height of Slope(m) 13m a = 32
w= Fellenius Method Simplified
SImplified
Bishop
Bishop
Method
Method
10 F.S. = 1.387 F.S. = 1.406 F.S. = 1.407
Slice Area Width H1 H2 Gt Wt c (deg.) (deg.) Hw cXl N tan Wsin ma Numer. ma Numer. ma Numer.
1 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 0.00 0.52 14.6 4.1 4.06 22.9 4.6 0.00 4.40 1.72 0.33 1.021 5.99 1.021 5.99 1.021 5.99
2 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 0.52 1.25 14.6 14.0 4.06 22.9 8.2 0.00 4.43 5.83 1.99 1.033 9.94 1.033 9.95 1.033 9.95
3 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 1.25 1.63 14.6 22.7 4.06 22.9 11.2 0.00 4.47 9.40 4.41 1.040 13.43 1.039 13.44 1.039 13.44
4 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 1.63 2.42 14.6 31.9 4.06 22.9 13.5 0.00 4.51 13.10 7.45 1.043 17.12 1.042 17.13 1.042 17.13
5 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 2.42 2.90 14.6 41.9 4.06 22.9 19.5 0.00 4.65 16.68 14.00 1.044 21.15 1.043 21.18 1.043 21.18
6 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 2.90 2.90 14.6 45.7 4.06 22.9 26.1 0.00 4.88 17.33 20.12 1.032 22.95 1.030 22.99 1.030 22.99
7 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 2.90 2.90 14.6 45.7 4.06 22.9 32.0 0.00 5.17 16.36 24.23 1.009 23.47 1.007 23.52 1.007 23.52
8 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 2.90 2.00 14.6 38.6 4.06 22.9 37.0 0.00 5.49 13.02 23.25 0.982 21.07 0.979 21.13 0.979 21.13
9 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 2.00 1.24 14.6 25.5 4.06 22.9 42.9 0.00 5.99 7.90 17.39 0.940 16.14 0.937 16.19 0.937 16.19
10 tri 0.0
rec 0.0
tri 1.08 1.24 0.00 14.6 9.8 10.90 33.300 46.5 0.00 17.10 4.42 7.09 1.032 17.63 1.027 17.71 1.027 17.72

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (4)

Sum 280.0 61.09 105.77 120.26 168.89 169.22 169.24
F.S. = (1)+(2)]/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3) F.S. = (4)/(3)
F.S. = 1.387 F.S.= 1.404 F.S.= 1.407 F.S.= 1.407
APPENDIX G
 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST

Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION

NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 06TH FEB, 2017
Operator BASSEY G. A. FISLT
material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1 , TPS & TP3

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3 NIS

S/NO NAME OF WAVE LENGTH AAS AAS AAS %
COMPOUND IN RANGES- RESULT RESULT RESULT
CATHRODE
OXIDE HALLOGEN (%) (%) (%)
LAMPS
1 Iron (FeO) 248.3nm 3.05% 2.80% 2.19% No Limit

2 NaCO3 508nm 9.90% 8.70% 9.40% 15.9

3 Silicon (SiO) 311.8nm 14.80% 14.20% 14.20% 20.5

4 Calcium (CaO) 258.2nm 17.90% 17.50% 17.30% 30.2

5 Zinc (ZnO) 213.9nm 2.60% 3.10% 2.80% 5

6 Aluminum (AI) 257.9nm 4.80% 4.10% 4.70% No Limit

Sodium Sulphate
7 509.2nm 7.50% 8.00% 7.70% 10.62
(NaSO4)

* PH 5.70% 7.80% 7.10% 6.5-8.5

* Sulphate 9.50% 10.10% 10.90% 15.2

Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name: name:
position: position:

signature:..
signature:
 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST

Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION

NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 06TH FEB, 2017
Operator BASSEY G. A. FISLT
material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1 , TPS & TP3

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3 NIS

S/NO NAME OF WAVE LENGTH AAS AAS AAS %
COMPOUND IN RANGES- RESULT RESULT RESULT
CATHRODE
OXIDE HALLOGEN (%) (%) (%)
LAMPS
1 Iron (FeO) 248.3nm 3.05% 2.80% 2.19% No Limit

2 NaCO3 508nm 9.90% 8.70% 9.40% 15.9

3 Silicon (SiO) 311.8nm 14.80% 14.20% 14.20% 20.5

4 Calcium (CaO) 258.2nm 17.90% 17.50% 17.30% 30.2

5 Zinc (ZnO) 213.9nm 2.60% 3.10% 2.80% 5

6 Aluminum (AI) 257.9nm 4.80% 4.10% 4.70% No Limit

Sodium Sulphate
7 509.2nm 7.50% 8.00% 7.70% 10.62
(NaSO4)

* PH 5.70% 7.80% 7.10% 6.5-8.5

* Sulphate 9.50% 10.10% 10.90% 15.2

Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name: name:
position: position:

signature:..
signature:
 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST

Client : Contract : NEWMAP GULLY EROSION

NEWMAP
Report No: 01 Date: 06TH FEB, 2017
Operator BASSEY G. A. FISLT
material description:
Source of material: ENIMA OMIN GULLY EROSION SITE
Location of sample: TP1 , TPS & TP3

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3 NIS

S/NO NAME OF WAVE LENGTH AAS AAS AAS %
COMPOUND IN RANGES- RESULT RESULT RESULT
CATHRODE
OXIDE HALLOGEN (%) (%) (%)
LAMPS
1 Iron (FeO) 248.3nm 3.05% 2.80% 2.19% No Limit

2 NaCO3 508nm 9.90% 8.70% 9.40% 15.9

3 Silicon (SiO) 311.8nm 14.80% 14.20% 14.20% 20.5

4 Calcium (CaO) 258.2nm 17.90% 17.50% 17.30% 30.2

5 Zinc (ZnO) 213.9nm 2.60% 3.10% 2.80% 5

6 Aluminum (AI) 257.9nm 4.80% 4.10% 4.70% No Limit

Sodium Sulphate
7 509.2nm 7.50% 8.00% 7.70% 10.62
(NaSO4)

* PH 5.70% 7.80% 7.10% 6.5-8.5

* Sulphate 9.50% 10.10% 10.90% 15.2

Laboratory Technician Consultants representative

name: name:
position: position:

signature:..
signature: