You are on page 1of 9

Doreen Massey Lecture

hyperlink

http://www.uni-heidelberg
.de/media/geographie
/Hettner1998.html
The Globalization Debate
Agreement on intensification of
Interconnectedness

Disagreement on how to characterize it:


Conceptualization
Causality
Periodization
Impacts
Trajectories
Alternative Perspectives

The Hyperglobalist Perspective

The Skeptical Perspective

The Transformationalist Perspective


Hyperglobalist Thesis
NEW ERA
ITS ABOUT THE ECONOMY, STUPID
REDUCTION OF SOVERIGNTY
Borderless World
Hollowing out of the State
WINNERS AND LOSERS
New global division of labor
Hyperglobalist Thesis

Boosters: Problems, yes; but whole world


will improve economically
Critics: Globalization creates uneven
development; need to consider social and
political aspects of development too. (See
Money Lenders)
The Skeptics Thesis
ITS A MYTH
Contemporary levels of global interdependency are not
unprecedented.
Really just heightened levels of internationalization
between national economies
REGIONALIZATION
Three major blocks and national governments remain
powerful
North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific
STATE IS STILL A PLAYER
Skeptics Critique of their world
Increasing uneven development
No real new international division of labor
Global corporation is a myth
Economic marginalization leads to
fragmentation and growth of
fundamentalism
Global governance and economic
internationalization are Western projects
Transformationalist Thesis

NEW PATTERNS OF STRATIFICATION


AMONG ACTORS
State, NGOs, Civil Society, Transnational and Global
Governance
NO CLEAR END POINT: OPEN ENDED/NON
TELEOLOGICAL
NEW OPPORTUNITIES
STATE BECOMES A CATALYZER

You might also like