Mad Glad Mostly Sad WHY

November 12 2007
We can not go higher until we Lower the Bar

By Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
June 30 2005 In the Beginning 34 Riverglen Drive
Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal Hearing Keswick, On.
375 D’arcy Street Newmarket Ontario L4P 2P8
Re: TNL-67103 franklyone@hotmail.com
(1) Don Wilson, my former tenant and president, director of BioSafe Natural Technologies Inc. a company
that I had invested in committed fraud over $100,000 and filed false and misleading information with the
ORHT over $43,000 in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren who doesn’t give a damn in a building
financed by the people to administer Justice under the Constitution Act, 1982. WHY?
Evidence
E-mail to Toronto Sun Editor dated October 8 2006 (73 page document)
-commentary and compiled evidence that was provided at the hearing and to Dave Grech- coordinator
Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
-disk copy of recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
.Note: The second and final day of the hearing July 28 2005 was not recorded. WHY?
______________________________________________________________________________________
(2) September 6 2005
Dave Grech coordinator Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing refuses to commence or cause to commence charges against Don Wilson. WHY?
It took near a month to get Dave Grech to write to explain why he refused to commence proceedings against
Don Wilson and when he finally did his reasons were absurd and incoherent to the evidence. WHY?
Evidence
- Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc
- Lawyer File # 2 March 30 2007
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Rick Hennessey Regional Manager OHRT refuses to commence proceedings against Don Wilson stating the
case was closed and wouldn’t be keeping my request on file. WHY?
-Tampered with evidence- removed part of recording WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing refuses to review Dave Grech’s decision not
to commence proceedings against Don Wilson because he trusts Dave Grech and refuses to investigate the
ORHT because they are independent of the government. WHY?
The Minister’s duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the ORHT
operates under the ACT.
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
1
(5) June 9 2006
Ombudsman decline to help for ridiculous reasons. WHY?
Evidence
(6) August 16 2006

Julia Munro MPP My representative refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(7) August 14 2006
Premier Dalton McGuinty Suggests Hon. John Gerretsen but refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
(8) 2006
Michael Bryant Attorney General Ontario Refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(9) November 14 2006
Det. Sgt. Randy Craig OPP-Anti-Rackets Refused evidence- Biased WHY?
Evidence
(10) January 10 2006

Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge York Regional Police Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
(11) November 15 2006

Sheldon Prior Ontario Commission on Police Services Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
(12) March 30 2006

General Details the crimes committed - reference to government conspiracy
Evidence
(13) April 1 2007

General The world according to mean appeal for sanity
Evidence

_______________________________________________________________________________________
2
(14) April 5 2007
Robert McLeary Crown Attorney, Newmarket, On Refuse to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 13 April 5 2007
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(15) April 5 2007
Paul Culver Crown Attorney, Toronto, On Refuse to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 13A April 5 2007
(16) April 7 2007

Sgt. Michael Thomson Royal Canadian Mounted Police Refuse to help Why?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 14 April 7 2007
_______________________________________________________________________________________
All of the above government personnel have received a copy of the 15 Lawyer Files
as have the government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last page
They as well as the list of government personnel on the last page have been provided my web site
addresses requesting each person deal with the issues referenced therein in accordance to and
consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Canadian Charter
Rights and Freedoms
This is pathetically absurd in itself as this is their responsibility but as I detail the story attached to
this it will be humongously clear they do not understand the concept and simply are not competent to
the task .
Contained within these writings is a preponderance of evidence which they voluntarily provided to me
presuming I was under the spell cast by the Office of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General
of Canada
This spell cast by the Office of the Attorney General of Canada is intended to lull the populace into a
passive state of tranquil trust whilst the government personnel fleece them bare to the astronomical
benefit of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who have been assigned all the top spots in
the illegitimate legal system of Canada operating in absolute contrast to the Constitution Act, 1982
The success is dependent on their ability to have us believe they are of the spirit of God and administer
and enforce the Constitution (document) as demanded consistent and conducive to it while in fact they
are of the spirit of the Devil and administer and enforce a modus operandi conducive to the benefit of
their members which has created a two tier system as a result to the extravagant benefit of the immoral
minority to the most pathetic detriment to the moral majority.
The irrefutable proof is available on my web sites which has been collected over a period of more than
two years where it all began on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal as a relatively
simple personal matter to evict a former tenant in arrears of $10,000 which evolved to a story of
historical proportions that will change life on earth forever.
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms 3
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
The Fiction of the Attorney General of Canada
This is just one of more than 33,000,000 true stories of the fiction of the Attorney General and every person
in Canada knows at least one of the stories of fiction because they are living it.
Reality is not at all what it seems yet is precisely how it is to each persons unique perception which is a piece
of heaven or hell or some where in between with no way out other than to comprehend any and every which
way they can to break the spell cast upon us by the powers that be who have used their evil against us as has
been the eternal struggle of humankind to control the evil that is inherent to us all.
This story must be told but more importantly must be read, understood and related to all Canadians for the
well being of the moral majority and the well deserved punishment to the immoral minority as gravity pulls
them down to earth to meet us as we rise in financial bliss worthy of our efforts as we seek out unobstructed,
our unique perception of Heaven on Earth
WARNING
It is of the utmost importance that you are aware that once you have read this book your life will
change forever and you will not be able to go back from whence you came for upon recognition of the
fiction it vanishes along with the perceptions of reality you existed and new fiction will be at your
immediate grasp to convert to the reality of your desires which is to the ultimate Ideal of the moral
majority of Canadians who will never look back as they forge ahead to their well deserved piece of
Heaven.
The power in this book is dependent on the power of the mind to comprehend the difference between
what is real due to the fiction lived and what is fiction due the reality lived which is somewhat of a
befuddlement but the more attentive you are to the realism of sanity the sooner you will settle into my
shoes as you gradually ease as one with my mind experiencing emotions bordering on hopelessness and
despair, frustrations and then conviction to the resolve as we retrace the reality of the insanity of more
than two years that dispelled the fiction which had obstructed the desired reality once unachievable
manifested uncontested due the befuddlement.
Perhaps now you are more befuddled, but fear not that is precisely where you need be to be with me
for this now relatively quick journey back in time to the promise of a prosperous future equal to
precisely that which you have earned and deserve according to The Law in the spirit of God.
It’s all fundamental and elementary my dear ….even if you are not Watson
It’s the simplest thing you will have ever done yet dwarfed by the simplicity of what’s yet to come in
the new world where
Fiction is Realized by All in Good Faith
4
Two and Half Years Back …Twelve Hours Forward Far Past Now
Unfortunately the trek is decidedly mundane inciting genocide so it is imperative you have full grasp of your
senses tentative to conviction with fortitude to retain alert consciousness whilst all around one by one are
passing out from attentiveness to monotony necessary combined with the excitement of the promising
eventuality ETA 12 hours with no turbulence expected however wanting due the prerequisite tedium
Well let’s give it a try and if you need a break it’s most reasonable and more so due to circumstance and
remember I have done it a gazillion times already with the promise of as many to come but I take great
solace in the knowing that those who endeavor the trek will go on to blaze the trails ahead for me to follow
when my work is done here.
Perhaps I will come upon someone who comprehends the necessity of my endeavor and will relieve me to go
on to other trails worthy to venture for the well being of the worthy.
It would be prudent to mention some will get it within the hour and some will think they got it but whether
that moment arises 1 hour or forty days it matters not until you take the initiative to make it real by
registering your faith and conviction as a member of our Society which affirms the reality.
You can rush on ahead and perhaps miss some of the necessary ingredients to dispel the fiction but you can
not walk too slow down this trail nor partake of too many diversions for I am there with you every moment
as I was so many times before and should we be parted, will rendezvous at the source of our power in cyber
space with the power of God, our spirits as one communicating in spirit as spirits until we meet face to face
in the world of God’s creation which is ours who are of the spirit of The Law which recognizes the
supremacy of God.
For the benefit of those who don’t get it, we do it for their benefit as well as our own and for those who do
get it most likely have it and to them I say prepare to share it.
I don’t hesitate to give the ending away to save you the seemingly long innocuous superfluity of mundane
necessity if your intelligence exceeds the necessity and point will be well made and received when you
become a member of our society whose initiative is to dispel the fiction by simply revealing it, turning the
princesses and princes, kings and queens of the Law Society of Upper Canada into the can of worms they are
and ultimately created, where feeding them to the birds, which most assuredly will be accepted by all as they
take their rightful place “for the birds” as is their ideology.
Do I hear an amen?
For those of you who are excited to the concept but see no need to take the full trek I remind you the cost is
the same either way, or any which way, Free as long as you sign up at the finish line.
Failure to do so will assuredly cost you as you support the status quo, continuity of the Fiction of their leader
which you remain loyal to as the answer to those charlatans’ prayers.
Forgive us for not forgiving you for you drag us with you due to you and others akin who don’t have the
sense or conscience to consider the realities certain as the fiction collapses unwillingly by the immoral
minority as we are incited to immorality for moral purpose once again, with many predictable unhappy
returns before the concept of true democracy under the supremacy of God takes for real.
I wish you all good luck with your conscience and direct you to the shortcut
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
5
For those of you requiring a little evidence to support a conviction, obviously not under the influence of the
members of the Law Society of Upper Canada, I direct you to my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society where more than ample evidence is to be found where if
you can believe in lies and fiction you will feel the power truth can bring.
For those caught up in the fiction and seek help from the above, come with me and fill your heads with truth
Then surely you will be nearest to the help you seek as you control your mind in and with the spirit of The
Law which is assuredly the spirit of God which in itself declared supreme.
Who would dare suggest God is Fiction once we can believe in The Law to be administered and enforced
consistent with and conducive to the spirit of God demanded.
Who is to demand it if not us, we the people of Canada?
United here in the Law Society of Lower Tier Canada in faith there is nobody above us but our spirits united
as one in the spirit of God in the Upper Tier where He is heads above us all.
Remember we can not go higher until we Lower the Bar

_________________________________________________________________
Under Construction - No Hard Hats allowed
A little knock on the head would help
_________________________________________________________________
Perhaps while I am readying for the 12 hour trek you might want to slip
over to the office http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-
freedoms and have a look around, where this will be found
Maybe you would like to take a kick at the Bar
Go ahead, it’s FREE
Just click on Do your part.doc and then simply do your part
Damn, almost wet my pants
Yes, Johnny…It is that easy. Now go tell mommy and daddy and every
stranger you meet.
Proof of the Government Conspiracy Against the Moral Majority
6
Pages 1-3 briefly outlines my encounters with government departments and agencies where their personnel
demonstrate a consistency of incompetence to administer and enforce the supreme law of Canada, the
Constitution Act, 1982 consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms.
On these first three pages I have listed encounters (1) – (16) which beg the question WHY? as to the way
they carry out business in the so called Legal System of Canada under the authority of the Constitution and
the following pages relate my initiatives as I set out determined to get the answers the government personnel
would not answer FFF, Forthright, Forthwith, Forthcoming
Their consistency to not be FFF and to avoid addressing the issues caused me to do some research which led
me to the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario Attorney
General’s web site which opened many more questions WHY?
Due to other circumstances beyond my control as Reality will have it I had reason to correspond with the
Law Society of Upper Canada on a completely separate personal matter which left me with more questions
WHY? and when you put all the WHY’s together there is a consistency which answers themselves.
The government personnel who did respond provided the evidence to consistently support that which the
questions WHY’s answered themselves.
That is to say the Constitution (document) which includes Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
which guarantees every individual equality in protection and benefits before and under the law demands a
Constitution (establishment) capable of backing the guarantees to every individual which is fundamental to
the endeavor.
Ultimately the government personnel must be irreproachable to purpose, competent, responsible and
accountable to the Canadian people who finance the whole system from top to bottom, buildings, parking
lots, vehicles, maintenance, utilities, office furniture, supplies, uniforms, equipment, human resources, their
excellent benefits, pensions, medical coverage, vacation pay, and extra holidays.
Reality itself is the best provider of the evidence which is commonly known and that is the people pay an
exorbitant amount of taxes to the government to structure the system and the departments are in place with
everything they need to accomplish the task and the following are excerpts from the Constitution (document)
which the Constitution (establishment) must be able to demonstrate due diligence to administer and enforce
the Constitution (The Law) with integrity, FFF consistently, consistent with and conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.
The government (establishment) is guaranteed the finances by the Constitution (document) through the
collection of taxes and the establishment has demonstrated over indulgence to that endeavor.
All things being fair we would expect at the very least due diligence to the application of The Law in
administering and enforcing it consistent with and conducive to the Constitution which ultimately the
individual’s guaranteed rights of equal protection and benefits are dependent on.
I have extracted some excerpts from the Act which are of particular importance which must be addressed
irreproachably with integrity FFF by the government personnel as they are fundamental to the moral society
guaranteed by the Charter and ultimately it is the Federal Government which provided the guarantee making
it their responsibility to put a modus operandi in place capable of backing the guarantee. This is a matter of
common sense and common law where sanity must prevail.
7
Constitution Act, 1982
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Obviously inconsistencies with the Constitution must be addressed immediately and amended
so as no further continuity of the inconsistency can occur depriving someone of their Charter
rights where left unattended an individual would be forced to pay the extravagant wages of
lawyers as they waste time debating something that has been guaranteed and ultimately a
huge waste of tax payers money tying up the legal system paying for all the costs coincidental
to it being in itself a humongous deprivation to the tax payer.
Having said that it is fundamental to the non deprivation of the tax payer that the government
personnel administer and enforce The Law effectively and efficiently proficient to purpose and
consistently be able to demonstrate due diligence to the endeavor.
Reality Attests
The stage is set, the government structured and financed under the authority of the
Constitution, the Revenue department in place to collect the taxes and the government
personnel in place responsible to administer and enforce The Law irreproachably with integrity
FFF consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.
The evidence you are about to be presented is irrefutable to the fact the government
personnel are anything but the irreproachable responsible people of integrity prerequisite of
the Constitution and it is to this endeavor I have provided the irrefutable evidence to the
government personnel whose e-mail addresses and fax numbers are listed on the last page.
They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-

of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms which addresses the issues and my efforts
to have them dealt with.
They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

where the evidence can be found should they have misplaced the evidence I had previously sent them.
8
The purpose of this initiative is to compile and articulate the issues as clearly as I am capable of to
demonstrate the deficiencies and incompetence of the government personnel to structure a legal
system, effective and efficient consistent with their obligation under the authority of the Constitution
(document) to put a modus operandi in place consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support
of the individual’s guaranteed rights as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
This document upon completion will not only identify and prove the inherent inadequacies of the
present legal system but will identify the government personnel responsible for the deficiencies and the
government personnel responsible to deal with them in a manner consistent with the Constitution.
The evidence will prove the government personnel responsible for the deficiencies and the government
personnel legally responsible to deal with the issues have not only been provided with the evidence but
in fact are united in a conspiracy against the Canadian people and have been deliberately irresponsible
to the people and their obligations to The Law for personal financial gain to the abhorred humongous
detriment to the moral majority to the extravagant benefit of the immoral minority thereby creating a
two tier system which is abundantly apparent to which reality attests.
The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer

Government personnel wages and benefits far surpass that of the public sector
That is “HOW IT IS” in reality but not “HOW IT IS” supposed to be by Law
This document will irrefutably prove the office of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada is behind the conspiracy against the moral majority and the members of the Law Society of
Upper Canada accomplices to the conspiracy which includes the people whose e-mail and fax addresses
appear on the last page of this document.
Upon completion of the compilation of this document I shall forward a copy to each of these addresses
providing them the opportunity to address the issues consistent with their obligation to the people of
Canada to play a major role consistent with and conducive to the authority granted them under the
Constitution where there must be seamless continuity, department to department consistent with and
conducive to the Constitution with emphasis upon the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of which
they have been financed and accepted benefit binding them to their obligation to administer and
enforce The Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution (document)
Constitution Act, 1982 was enacted by the government personnel of authority under the Constitution of
1867 who ceded the spirit of The Law to be that of God which is supported by
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
9
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Whereas the spirit of God is consistent with the spirit of the letter of The Law
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.
(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit
as well as in the letter.
With the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms the government personnel of authority were immediately obliged and responsible to
restructure the Legal System consistent with and conducive to the support of the guarantees made to
the individual as provided by the Charter and I reiterate it is the responsibility of the Federal
Government and their assigns having authority to enact the Constitution Act, 1982 to back the
guarantee consistent with and conducive to it in the spirit of God and The Law which is one and the
same which is inconsistent with the traditional values of the government personnel who enacted it and
in fact it is due their inconsistencies with the spirit of God the Charter was included in respect of the
people and their spirits conducive to a moral society in the spirit of God.
The evidence will irrefutably show the spirit of the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General
of Canada and the spirit of the Office of the Ontario Attorney General were not of the spirit of God and
The Law prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and they have not changed today as required
by the 1982 enactment of The Law (document)
Not only will the evidence found or referenced herein irrefutably prove it but they will ultimately debate
it proving unequivocally their consistency to the unscrupulous traditional ways prior to the 1982
enactment being persistently consistent with that which the evidence irrefutably proves that the
government personnel of the Constitution (establishment) administer and enforce The Law (document)
illegally inconsistent with it for no other purpose than personal gain and benefit to the humongous
detriment to the moral majority.
Having said that which is a reiteration upon reiteration, failure of any of the government personnel,
whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last page, to make every effort to address the issues
referenced herein so as to restructure the Legal System consistent with and conducive to the support of
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights will be conclusive proof of their part in the conspiracy against
the people and will be held accountable to the people and immediately be relieved of their duties along
with separation of any rights of financial benefit, in particular pension funds.
These funds will be paid back to the rightful owners, being the taxpayers and any attempt to obstruct
this justice will find them up on charges of treason and conspiracy which will be their responsibility to
finance their own defense for the tax payer is not inclined to defend those who conspired against them.
Those government personnel who refuse to perform their service consistent with the Constitution as
they have been financed to do will experience the wrath of the tax payer and that is all you will take to
the bank and you can bank on it along with the publication of your shame.
I remind you all, that any traditions, laws, policies, precedence, etal not consist with the Constitution
have no force or effect as per their inconsistencies with The Law.
10
Any inference that the intent of The Law was not to actually back the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights will be deemed as an admittance of precisely what it is. A government purposely
misrepresenting The Law to deceive the people and representative of that which the evidence
irrefutably proves that the government conspired against the people for personal benefit.
Kind of a Catch 22
You either act FFF with integrity to deal with the issues in Lawyer Files 1-3 in public with the initiative
to expose the Ontario Attorney General for what he is as the evidence irrefutably proves or you will
irrefutably prove that is what he is by not attempting to expose him, with emphasis on what you are.
To that eventuality I commence with: whereas the evidence printed in blue is to be found at the bottom
of the page on my web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
This is the true story of my venture into futility to seek justice in accordance with the Constitution
(Document)where the individual’s are guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms by the Federal
Government whereby upon the Federal Government personnel and their assigns commonly known as
the Constitution (Establishment), upon acceptance of financial benefit in monetary gains and benefit
and sworn to uphold The Law of our country to carry on duties consistent with and conducive to the
individuals guaranteed Charter Rights are bound to that endeavor
The venture into futility is evident in itself as to the irrefutable proof of the incompetence of the
Constitution (Establishment) to structure a system competent to support the provisions of the
guarantee of the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms which is fundamental to the Constitution in
the spirit of God which is the very foundation and spirit of the Canadian people where the supremacy of
God is recognized.
Whereas the Constitution (Document) is the Supreme Law of Canada which recognizes the
Supremacy of God it is prerequisite and incumbent upon the Government Personnel,
Constitution (Establishment) be irreproachable in the spirit of The Law and God where
consistency of Moral Conscience is mandatory consistent with the supremacy of God
This is fundamental to the foundation and spirit of Canada
The evidence contained within these writings and referenced herein is not only irrefutable as to the
Constitution (Establishment’s) incapability to uphold The Law as mandated but it is conclusive as to their
intent which is to have the people believe they are the responsible irreproachable people demanded of the
Constitution (Document), The Law to administer and enforce The Law consistent with and conducive to
The Law as they carry on consistently in their unscrupulous traditional ways so entrenched under the
guidance of the Law Society of Upper Canada who has the audacity to admit to me either stated or implied
for all the world to see they do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms as theirs members administer and enforce The Law consistent to their belief while having the
people believe they are attentive to their obligations to the people to uphold The Law which they have sworn
to do.
Somewhat of a befuddlement which will remain in perpetuity unless the befuddlement is unfuddled which
the evidence irrefutably does and all that remains is to be read in the spirit of The Law as defined by The
Law as the Spirit of God
11
The Purpose of The Law (Document) is to define the spirit which must exist in the conscience of minds of
every individual of Canada to be in compliance with The Law and the purpose of The Law (Establishment)
is to assure every individual’s actions are in compliance with The Law.
The conscience of mind is a private and personal thing unique to each individual
where their body functions demonstrate their individual ability to control it consistent
with the spirit of The Law in moral conscience under the supremacy of God.
Upon an individual’s demonstration of ineptness to the endeavor it is the responsibility of the Constitution
(Establishment) each individual of the Government personnel to demonstrate by body function their
acceptance of the responsibility assigned to them which they have accepted in principle demonstrated by
their willing acceptance of financial benefit for the purpose which ultimately requires due diligence attentive
to aiding all individuals to be competent to control the conscience of their mind consistent in moral
conscience under the supremacy of God which is the spirit of The Law (Document)
The Constitution (Document) and the Constitution (Establishment) are cohabitants of the supreme law of
Canada, housed in the Constitution where the Document is the dominant tenant and the Establishment the
subordinate tenant.
It is incumbent upon all subordinates to identify any and all insubordinates and evict them from tenancy due
their tendency to be inconsistent of their mandated obligation where every individual of the government
personnel plays a vital role in the seamless continuity of The Law which governs us all equally as defined
and guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Due to the befuddlement of circumstance where the evidence referenced in these

writings and all things in reality attests to a conspiracy perpetrated by the
government personnel mandated to administer and enforce The Law making it
impossible for the individual of Canada to receive the justice guaranteed by the
Charter in the courts of our land where the whole Legal System is under the
control of the conspirators I have taken the liberty under the authority of The Law
to conduct a criminal investigation in the manner of a Public Inquiry which
commenced publicly on September 1 2006 where some of the major players of
the conspiracy were provided copies of the BLACK BOOK, a copy of said book
can be found on my web site BLACK BOOK.
http://groups.google.com/group/black-book
The government personnel addressed in the 15 Lawyer Files which can be found on my web
site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
have all been provided copies of the BLACK BOOK and during the course of the Public
Inquiry were provided copies of the 15 Lawyer Files, dated March 30 2007 and early April
2007.
12
The evidence in the BLACK BOOK implicated them in the conspiracy and the evidence in
the 15 Lawyer Files was presented to them providing them the opportunity to address the
issues and respond in defense of the charges laid against them but they declined to do so.
The evidence being irrefutable as to their negligence in performance of their mandates

authorized under the authority of the Constitution (Document) which requires them to act
responsibly consistent in the spirit of The Law which is in the spirit of God consistent with
and conducive to the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms offered
them the opportunity to deal with the issues but reality itself attests to the fact they have not
and since they have offered nothing in their defense to this day November 11 2007 I upon the
authority of the Constitution (Document) declare them guilty of willfully misusing the
powers entrusted to them by the Canadian people to conspire to structure a system consistent
with and conducive to the special interests of the members of the Law Society of Upper
Canada who have by their own admittance adamantly stated or implied their members do not
give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter of Rights and Freedoms proving
beyond all and any reasonable doubt the Federal Legal System operated by the members of
the Law Society of Upper Canada are incompetent to administer and enforce The Law in a
manner to achieve justice consistent with the spirits of The Law and God conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as the document Law Society of Upper Canada asserts
and a copy is to be found by going to web site http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms click on Do your part.doc and go to page 11 where you can click
on to said document proving irrefutably their ineptness to reason let alone sit to judge as to
whether evidence presented to them is beyond reasonable doubt to administer justice in
accordance with The Law they are obliged to administer and enforce..
Due Regard to the credibility of the evidence
To dismiss any allegations by the conspirators or their supporters that the evidence
lacks credibility I offer the irrefutable evidence that the evidence provided during the
course of this trial was submitted by the conspirators themselves demonstrating their
pathetic incompetence to their own defense having been provided all the resources
financed by the Canadian people and being educated in the system of the ins and outs to
access the resources with the support of the members of the Law Society of Upper
Canada all free of charge, compliments of the Canadian tax payer having astronomical
advantage over this individual and ultimately every individual of Canada is pathetically
the greatest laugh of the ignorance of the self proclaimed intelligence of the human
resources of the Constitution (Establishment)
I now present the evidence submitted during the course of the trial and I highly
recommend you have ample change of underwear at the ready as the government
personnel do their Abbot and Costello version of administering and enforcing The Law
13
To set the stage
Evidence printed in blue is available for all to see on my aforesaid web sites which the conspirators
have all be informed.
(1) Don Wilson, my former tenant and president, director of BioSafe Natural Technologies Inc. a company
that I had invested in committed fraud over $100,000 and filed false and misleading information with the
ORHT over $43,000 in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren who doesn’t give a damn in a building
financed by the people to administer Justice under the Constitution Act, 1982. WHY?
Evidence
E-mail to Toronto Sun Editor dated October 8 2006 (73 page document)
-commentary and compiled evidence that was provided at the hearing and to Dave Grech- coordinator
Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
-disk copy of recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
.Note: The second and final day of the hearing July 28 2005 was not recorded. WHY?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
When you read the 73 page document (3) Sun Editor you will know my former tenant committed the crimes
as stated in (1) above.
On pages 37 and 38 of document (3) To: Sun Editor October 8 (Part 2).doc on web site Law Society of
Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society is a copy of the dispute signed
and faxed on my telephone line by Don Wilson on June 10 2005 to the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
from my basement where he resided as my former tenant.
I have a copy of it because it printed out on my fax machine upstairs where I live at 34 Riverglen Drive,
Keswick, On. L4P 2P8
Don Wilson was filing his dispute to my application of June 6 2005 to have him evicted for arrears of rent of
$8000 at the time (pages 19-23) and for failing to vacate the premises as agreed (Pages 24-26)
You will note on page 38 that if Don Wilson had not filed his dispute within 5 days of receiving my
application to evict him June 6 2005 there would be no reason for a hearing.
He filed his dispute and the hearing went on as scheduled for June 30 2005 and he and I were both present.
I offer this to make it clear that it was Don Wilson who filed the dispute to the ORHT so you will know
when you read the September 6 2005 letter from Dave Grech coordinator of Investigations and Enforcement
Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing that he erred and seemed to be of the understanding
that I filed Don Wilson’s dispute with the ORHT which is absolutely ridiculous. Right?
After all, I would hardly drive down to Scarborough and pay $150 to have him evicted and then file a dispute
for him to prevent the eviction.
Immediately one has to wonder the competence of Dave Grech who not only works in this field of endeavor
but is the head man.
So upon reasoning this, the answer as to WHY? he did it, with the benefit of all the evidence in hand was to
deceive me in believing he had no reason to commence or cause to commence proceedings against Don
Wilson.
He obviously did not want to prosecute Don Wilson even though the evidence called for it and it is his
responsibility to do so.
14
This raises another WHY?
Why didn’t he want to perform his duty? This we understand when we answer the WHY’s? in (1) above
During the course of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 the judicator Nancy Fahlgren was not prepared
for this case which she called Bizarre because there were matters dealing with shares I owned of a company
which Don Wilson was president, ceo, treasurer, director and whatever else he wanted to be.
She kept wondering why I introduced documents regarding the shares when we were here at a rental
Tribunal.
That is where the offense of filing false and misleading information with the ORHT under s.206 (2) of the
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 by Don Wilson comes in.
His dispute indicated he had paid up rent to February of the year 2009 due to his fabrication as to how the
shares I bought of his company included rent to the year 2009. This valued at more than $43,000
That is why I was introducing evidence as to how I actually bought the shares which is all covered in the (3)
document Sun Editor document provided in 2 parts, Sun Editor October 8 (Part 1).doc Sun Editor October
8 (Part 2).doc proving Don Wilson’s dispute to be false and misleading information.
I had attached a copy of the 4 page May 6 2005 agreement to the application to evict and a copy of this can
be found on pages 27-31 where Don and I both signed all 4 pages witnessed by my mother.
Don Wilson agreed to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 on page 1 of the agreement (Page 27) and on
page 4 (Page 30) he agreed he owed me so much rent plus interest to the date of signing.
At first Nancy Fahlgren was mystified as to why she was reading all about shares on the agreement and what
it had to do with the issues at hand regarding rent but I eventually got her to understand that Don Wilson had
signed two different stories.
He had signed the May 6 2005 agreement to confirm he owed me rent and agreed to leave on May 31 2005
and he had signed and filed a dispute with ORHT stating he was paid up until February of the year 2009.
At first she couldn’t even find a copy of Don’s dispute but eventually she found a copy of one page of the
dispute as on page 37 and I asked her to compare it with the copy I had which she did and confirmed.
I was quite a novice at playing Perry Mason but quite surprised at how incompetent she was at playing Judge
Judy.
The case had been going on for a while and she had no idea why I was evicting Don and why he was
disputing the eviction.
Seems to me that information would be fundamental and the place to begin and once I fumbled my way to
bring her into the reality we were attempting to address, things ran a whole lot smoother and soon she
acknowledged that she was coherent to what I was trying to prove.
That’s when I said “There ought to be a law” which I was sure there was and she confirmed “There is” and
went on to articulate how she has the authority to forward the case onto the Investigations and Enforcement
Unit which of course she never did and that portion of the recording is removed WHY?
15
On the recording of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 you will hear Don Wilson denying having ever
seen or signed the May 6 2005 agreement Pages 27- 30) or the April 13 2005 agreement (Pages 31 -36)
which was basically the same as the May 6 2005 which replaced it.
I provided the witness to the April 13 2005 agreement who attested to the fact that Don Wilson had indeed
signed it and of course my mother had witnessed the May 6 2005.
The inherent problem here is both of the agreements had identical signatures which Don had signed but they
were not the signature he normally uses as you will see on his dispute and other documents to be found in the
Sun Editor 2 part document and his denying have ever signed the documents proves his intent was to deny
their validity some time down the road when I attempted to cash in on my investment.
That is clear and simple fraud valued at over $100,000 as is the false and misleading information he filed
with the ORHT which is not only an offense under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but an offense under the
Constitution Act, 1982 in matters of fraud regarding the $43,000 in his bid to have paid up rent to February
of the year 2009
Toward the end of the first day of the Tribunal hearing June 30 2005 I provided an abundance of evidence to
prove everything Don Wilson had stated on his dispute and reiterated at the hearing was false and he was
asked to respond to a 14 page chronicle (Pages 46-59) I had also provided to the judicator by July 21 2005 to
both me and the ORHT before the second day of the hearing July 28 2005 which he never did but there was
nothing he could dispute and he didn’t.
Nancy Fahlgren reviewed the evidence over the month between June 30 2005 and the second day of the
hearing July 28 2005 and when the hearing continued at the beginning of the second day she announced the
hearing would not be recorded that day. WHY?
The ORHT found for me on August 8 2005 in Order TNL-67103 (Pages 60-62)
There was no mention as to whether or not Nancy had commenced or caused to commence proceedings
against Don Wilson so I telephoned her office to find out on August 10 2005 as soon as I had received the
Order TNL-67103 in the mail but I was told I could not communicate with her and nobody could help me but
I did order a copy of the recording of the hearing and paid for it immediately by visa. It was nearly three
weeks before I received a disk copy of the hearing and I had to phone to inquire where it was. WHY?
WHY did it take so long and WHY was the second day of the hearing not recorded and WHY was
information removed from the recording of the hearing.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Dave Grech coordinator Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing refuses to commence or cause to commence charges against Don Wilson. WHY?
It took near a month to get Dave Grech to write to explain why he refused to commence proceedings against
Don Wilson and when he finally did his reasons were absurd and incoherent to the evidence. WHY?
Evidence
- Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc
_______________________________________________________________________________________
The document Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc indicates my efforts to get him to
write me to explain why he would not commence or cause to commence proceedings against Don Wilson.
16
I faxed his office several times commencing August 10 2005 with many phone calls returned from snarly
staff of his office refusing to respond in writing even though I had requested written responses each fax but
eventually Dave Grech wrote me with a ridiculous response incoherent to the evidence which caused me to
drive down town to his Toronto office where he was not available to see me.
I left all the evidence with Raol Pascual as referenced in the document Sun Editor and a-disk copy of
recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
He refused to respond so I wrote again and again and he has a copy of all 15 Lawyer Files but no response.
So again the question WHY?

WHY was his staff so snarly and unaccommodating? WHY wouldn’t they write?
WHY would Dave not just do his job as he is responsible to do?
Surely he would not do so on his own. Right?
He must have consulted with someone, probably from the beginning and I am thinking probably back before
the 2nd day of the Tribunal hearing when they decided not to record that day of July 28 2005.
What do you think?
______________________________________________________________________________________
Rick Hennessey Regional Manager OHRT refuses to commence proceedings against Don Wilson stating the
case was closed and wouldn’t be keeping my faxes on file. WHY?
-Tampered with evidence- removed part of recording WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Rick Hennessey responded rather quickly on September 30 2005 the same day of my second fax.
The first request being just two days earlier on September 28 2005. WHY so quick
WHY so quick unless he had already consulted someone on the issues?
WHY would he not just do his job and forward the file on to Investigations and Enforcement unless he had
consulted with someone and I am thinking probably back before the 2nd day of the Tribunal hearing when
they decided not to record that day of July 28 2005.
What do you think?
So many WHY’s so let’s see what Hon. John Gerretsen has to say, after all he is the Minister of Municipal
Affairs and Housing whose duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 which the
ORHT operates under and Hon John charged the Investigations and Enforcements Unit with that
responsibility and Dave Grech heads the Unit.
Surely Hon. John would like to know what’s going on. Right?
__________________________________________________________________________
Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing refuses to review Dave Grech’s decision not to
commence proceedings against Don Wilson because he trusts Dave Grech and refuses to investigate the ORHT
because they are independent of the government. WHY?
The Minister’s duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the ORHT
operates under the ACT.
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Well, I guess that clears it all up. Look Jane see Spot run
17
Hon. John trusts Dave Grech, even though he read the evidence in one hand and sees no reason not to trust Dave Grech
on the other hand who leaves so many WHY’s unanswered. (See copy of Hon. John’s letter of September 26 2006 on
pages 6 and 7 of Lawyer File # 3)
Hon. John states the ORHT is an independent agency at arms length of the government and he has no right to interfere.
WHY?
The government interferes with anything it wants and he suggests they have no right to interfere.
How could Hon. John perform his duty as Minister to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act if
he didn’t interfere so to speak, one way or another?
I believe they were all informed of my concerns prior to their responses and were advised. Do you think?
Well let me inform that they were informed because on September 1 2006 I sent them all a copy of the
BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2006 addressed to Premier Dalton McGuinty, a copy of which can be
found on my web site BLACK BOOK http://groups.google.com/group/black-book
So now what do you think?
When I say they have all received a copy I mean everyone referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files and more
including my MP Peter Van Loan.
So you see, the Federal Government is linked here since September 2006 but Peter Van Loan has never
responded. WHY?
Maybe it was something I said, in the BLACK BOOK that is.
Come on now, we’re only at Lawyer File # 3. You have got to keep up.
If you are not coherent at this point you won’t make it to the finish so go back to the beginning and keep focused or let
your kids handle it. I shouldn’t have to remind any of you of the seriousness of this exercise. Should I?
It’s all been Dick and Janed to you but you are adults and it’s time to accept responsibility to be coherent to the facts
because you certainly will be called upon to act responsibly in your prominent positions of the Canadian Legal System
administering and enforcing The Law consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms.
So I’ll stop here for a while, catch up on some sleep while you earn your pay and study the material introduced so far.
Let us not forget what Confucius says.
“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”
I should mention that this is a reality test and the answers are not in the back or front of the book.
This one you must solve for yourself even though the answers are obvious scrawled this way and that on
every page from front to back consistent with that which is to be made out which is written between the
lines.
It’s best to know the truth because your future depends on you and the decision you make.
Sure it’s difficult to break bad habits but there comes a time ……and it’s closing fast
Well here we go, all up to speed now, Right?
Criminal crimes were committed in a building financed by the people as part of the Legal System of Canada
to administer and enforce justice consistent with and conducive to the guaranteed protection of every
individual of Canada where attentiveness to deterrence is priority number one where criminals unpunished
are predictable to spread the word of weaknesses in the system and being more experienced will be more
difficult to be caught the second time and made to pay for their crimes leaving many victims in their wake
not counting the victims dependents and the noticeable change which can reflect upon his work affecting
employers and friends and so on like that.
18
All things that are most comprehendible once victimized that need not be if you just do the jobs you are
financed and responsible to do.
If you are not coherent to these realities then you can not possibly be coherent to and capable of the job you
are responsible to do where you must not only be irreproachable but be competent of what you are
irreproachable of and required to be.
The person at the top must be most weary and alert to all realities involving human beings especially when
involved in the Legal System dealing with the inherent problems of dealing with the conscience of human
minds where the government personnel of the Legal System are unfortunately human and given the
importance and purpose of your jobs on the moral conscience of society it is of dire consequences and a most
pathetic example of hopelessness and despair if you can’t control the conscience of the God damned
government personnel charged with that mandate.
It is to this endeavor I assert every effort for the benefit of humankind and I must emphasize that I did not set
out on this trek as a career, you people did and financed to do so, whereas I am not but I do it because it
chanced upon me having some experience in the environment 2 ½ years ago learning quickly as I go due my
understanding of purpose other than a reasonable job to support my desires.
As everything I state can be reasoned to be true, I do this because it’s the right thing to do, not to support me
which I make nothing from. The reason is most worthy, though I am no Mother Theresa yet could put many
of such types out of work by dealing with the root of the problems rather than the symptoms.
It’s kind of like when the boat springs a leak, bail as fast as you can, get back to dry land and fix the damn
leak.
Until the leak is fixed take every precaution that some innocent person, obviously naïve to the danger doesn’t
launch it with wife and family.
It’s all too simple if you deal with it simply and when there are clear and imminent dangers to anyone there
simply is no time to meander through the web of deceit you people have woven to find if there is a legal way
to save somebody, for alas your sorrys don’t help and too bad you don’t feel the realities of sorry as the
victims do.
If you can’t figure the ramifications of your conspiracy on the realities of the people because you are
ignorant of the experience don’t worry because your persistence to ignorance will find you there but
unfortunately when you understand the people will understand your nature not worthy of their trust, destined
to roam the earth in hopelessness and despair along with them.
You people are comfortable with every opportunity to do the right thing. You are in a peaceful environment
with food on the table assured tomorrow.
Nothing stopping you from thinking
Now stop that, you can’t always be thinking about how to use people.
WHY not help them? Hell, that’s what you are paid to do.
Doesn’t get better than that, being paid to help people. What a novel idea.
Just think, I mean really, Just think.
Okay you have done it and don’t get it.

19
Have a look in the mirror and look at a pathetic fool and ignorant disgrace for a human being who accepts
money and benefit to help people who helps themself instead and stands there laughing.
Well if you understand that then you will understand when we laugh as others who don’t understand reach
out in revenge.
Oh, I won’t be part of it but I will laugh and most likely will be sorry later but heck, what could I do being
just one individual against the world.
If only there was something that could be done before the predictable, eh?
People are so predictable in general yet individually unpredictable unless of course you know the
individual’s particular perception due to circumstance beyond our knowledge not being familiar with them
and all.
How would we know that the individual hadn’t eaten well for a while assuring his family was okay or
perhaps another couldn’t make it playing your silly games so set out to do the best they could which found
them in jail with the family left to fend on their own and the oldest son thinks he’s smarter than dad and
leaves no witnesses as the family survives and others don’t.
I don’t know, every once in a while I go crazy where I seem to understand reality better and then I give my
head a shake and realize there is no possible way to understand it no matter what I experience because that is
just “How it is” as Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets tells me. See Lawyer File # 8
WHY? Is the question that persistently pops up.
WHY is the sky blue? Personally I don’t give a damn although I have been taught and don’t remember
because the information is irrelevant to me as is what weather tomorrow brings because I am stuck here
behind this computer trying to get people to give a damn about their jobs which benefit them well but their
incompetence to it does nothing for the people who pay them to help them.
It’s something one isn’t likely to want to think about, is it?
I mean like when we have to go to the hospital we know what to expect and yet every where are sick people.
Some don’t appear to be as sick as one would expect and others appear to be sicker than one could have
imagined unless of course you have been there, done that and survived.
Don’t matter, once you get yourself the hell out of there and back to reality not being a doctor and all, what
can you do?
So life goes on to death.
That’s just “How it is” Right?
Lucky there are doctors who act like doctors doing the best they can for what they are paid to do and lucky
for us they have their hearts in it regardless if it is for the money.
There success depends on their ability to be successful with their patients, putting their heart into learning the
job for the purpose intended and each individual gets what they need and deserve.
20
It all works and too bad there isn’t more of them.
Surprising too because most parents wouldn’t mind their kids growing up to be doctors or at least marrying
one, even though their motives aren’t necessarily directed to help people and in fact more in the nature of
helping themselves.
Too bad success in your business isn’t founded on what you can do for a moral society as the people
desperately need and in fact trust and believe you are competent to the task.
Can you imagine? Yes I suppose you have. Then what would we need you people for, if you ever
accomplished your assignments.
So it becomes a way of life you enjoy and the people suffer until they are so bad off and receive the proper
care of a doctor
Well, got through that and I’m back insanely trying to do my best sanely for sanity and the well being of all
and of course unequivocally me who you all understand when me is you.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(6) August 16 2006

Julia Munro MPP My representative refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Not a whole lot to say here other than Julia is my Ontario Government representative and she has been kept
apprized of the insanity that is going on and I suppose it’s considered normal to her.
I have copied her letter to me of August 16 2006 to demonstrate the insanity of it all. (See page 24)
Julia informs me that the Ombudsman is considered the last resort, so to speak, and since I have already been
there I am shit out of luck.
Do any of you do anything other than nothing or direct traffic?
I send a preponderance of evidence for you people to read and what do you get out of it.
If the Ombudsman is the last resort and I have covered all the bases WHY do we need any of you?
What is it that you do that a kid couldn’t handle and we could assure they are well looked after?
I complain that the Ombudsman does not have a clue how to read a complaint and identify the actual
problem and of course that is the problem that runs rampant throughout the Legal System where there is no
one competent to reality for the Attorney General has cast his spell. See Lawyer File # 4
Lawyers are the enemy of the moral majority led by the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada whose actions are monitored by the Law Society of Upper Canada who don’t give a damn
about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights as documented in the Law Society of Upper Canada file
which you will find by going to web site http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-
of-rights-and-freedoms and click on Do your part.doc and go to page 11.
I hardly think a lawyer is about to help, being obliged to abide by unscrupulous traditional values not only
inconsistent with the Constitution and inconsistent with the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights but the
21
Law Society of Upper Canada adamantly state or imply their members do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and they are only obliged to vigorously advance the interests of their
clients or in other words whoever can afford to pay for their services.
I do not know what the statistics are and doubt there are any about how many middle class have to pay for
their lawyers to take a criminal to court who I would presume the majority of them would have their lawyers
paid for by the tax payer and they will get the best defense and appeals the tax payer can afford to pay while
individually they can’t afford a lawyer of their own and often is the case they just write it off as a lesson
learned where the criminal walks and learns nothing other than he or she can get away with criminal acts and
progress on to bigger crimes leaving a great number of victims in their wake before The Law finally catches
up with them.
Lawyers who don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights are the first to claim these
guaranteed rights for the criminal element as they do everything possible to obstruct the guaranteed victim’s
rights to justice.
Think about it.

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society
This clearly states or implies the individual is guaranteed Charter rights as long as they stay in the
bounds of The Law and should they break them they are subject to sane limitations as can be justified
such as a person allegedly killing someone is likely to be locked up before trial and that type of thing
that is obviously demonstrably justified. Obviously someone is dead who was guaranteed not to be
They are quite attentive to the individuals guaranteed rights as he or she is innocent with the evidence
stacked against them and yet the innocent victim’s Charter rights are trampled all over without them
giving a damn about it and quite probably the reason there are victims.
I hope I am making myself clear but there is a very good example of reality if you will just study the
aforesaid Law Society of Upper Canada file which proves irrefutably that which I state and in fact I have
had to let the matter go because it is not worth putting good money which I don’t have after bad, good
money which is rightfully mine but costs are prohibitive.
The very fact that I would have to pay a lawyer which I can not afford against the particular lawyer’s
client referenced within the said file who can well afford a lawyer obviously because he plays the odds
that I won’t contest the situation and he gains $7000 +or – for his efforts.
Please take the time to read the said file and understand.
The only person who lost is their victim, me who was completely innocent and they did nothing but
bullshit and the Law Society of Upper Canada sees nothing wrong.
This type of thing goes on and on unreported and thusly any statistics would be completely inaccurate
and therefore the issues never addressed.
There obviously is something drastically wrong with the Legal System when the evidence such as mine
in this other matter regarding the criminal acts of my former tenant at the ORHT are left unpunished
and the victim is told how ignorant he is to let somebody take his money and how they try to warn the
public to be careful.
22
It’s a little too late after the fact and besides that the people are quite aware but regardless criminal
acts happen and when the criminal is caught in the act he or she must be brought to justice for
deterrence sake if nothing else.
But what about the victims rights to justice and in particular the fact is the victim is the innocent party
and his rights surely must exceed that of the criminal element in an intended moral society which
surely must be the intent of the Constitution where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize
the supremacy of God.
The Legal System has everything backwards or any which way it can to benefit the members of the Law
Society of Upper Canada to the great detriment of the moral majority and the facts are everywhere to
prove it but who cares?
Obviously that is what my evidence proves along with many other detriments to the moral majority.
I am not asking anyone of you to present the case before the courts about the conspiracy because that
of course would be futile.
I am asking for a PUBLIC INQUIRY as I have always to deal with the issues realistically.
As I continue to present the evidence you will see it is overwhelmingly irrefutable to that which I state.
As for Hon John Gerretsen, he must be brought to trial for obstruction of justice which will ultimately
lead to the Attorney General of Ontario and then the Federal Attorney General which would obviously
reveal the conspiracy publicly.
The inherent problem though is documented in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”
where the police may consult with the Attorney General or his agents, the Crown Attorneys but it is up
to the police to lay the charges then it is up to the Attorney General whether or not to go ahead and
prosecute.
Now you tell me how the individual can ever expect justice in Canada when the Attorney General
doesn’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights?
Think about it.

Oh, you have and don’t give a damn.
Somebody is going to give a damn and then there will be a lot of people giving a damn that they never
thought was within them.
Think about it
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
It is the criminal who is to be deprived and the evidence discerns who is who
23
24
______________________________________________________________________________________
(5) June 9 2006
Ombudsman decline to help for ridiculous reasons. WHY?
Evidence
See Lawyer File # 4

Throughout this file the Ombudsman admit their
limitations to act in a manner their web site falsely
misrepresents to have the people believe they are an
independent agency for the people
They affirm that which I allege and the evidence irrefutably proves that the government personnel
mandated to administer and enforce The Law are persistent in their continuity of conspiracy against the
people.
The Ombudsman not only attest to that but by their correspondence to me demonstrates the incompetence
of staff to the challenge even if they were the independent group dedicated to that which their web site
purports them to be.
My first letter to the Ombudsman dated May 31 2006 began Re: Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal and
went on to define the relative issues. See page 8 of Lawyer File # 4
On page 10 of the said document is Janet Ortved’s response dated June 9 2006 listing some of their
precluded limitations and blocked in yellow shows her incompetence to determine the purpose of the
subject matter which began Re: Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal and on 13 demonstrates their
25
ineptness to investigate in resemblance to that which be considered competent to an investigative authority
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(7) August 14 2006
Premier Dalton McGuinty Suggests Hon. John Gerretsen but refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
On page 6 of Lawyer File # 6 is the response of Premier Dalton McGuinty dated August 14 2006 copied
hereto on the following page 27 who affirms that which I allege that he as well as other government officials
are incompetent to address the issues as presented and remain persistent to have me and others believe the
ORHT and other so called independent agencies are independent and at arms length of the government.
The Premier begins with the understanding that my case is before the ORHT when actually it was after and
the ORHT had already issued the Tribunal Order TNL-67103 on August 8 2006 which I had received on
August 10 2006 a copy of which is to be found on pages 60-62 of document (3) To: Sun Editor October 8
(Part 2).doc on web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-
society
He would have me believe elected representatives such as he the Premier are not permitted to comment on or
intervene in any specific case and must not interfere in the Tribunal Proceedings.
I would have no trouble believing that if that was the issue I addressed to him and repeatedly
addressed to him as documented in Lawyer File # 6 dated March 30 2007 long after Rick Hennessey of
the ORHT adamantly stated the case was addressed and closed as of the Tribunal Order TNL-67103
dated August 8 2005 (See Lawyer File # 1 page 5)
The Premier has perhaps responded correctly if the Tribunal had been in progress which it was not as clearly
it was done and finished with as far as the ORHT was concerned but not as far I was concerned as indicated
by my online address of the issues to Premier Dalton McGuinty who would have me believe my concerns
were important to him and he sympathizes with my current difficulties at the time.
What I do believe and have every reason to believe given that the Premier has been provided the evidence
that the ORHT Proceedings have been closed as of August 8 2006 he as an elected representative of the
people should deal with the issues in a manner so as to see the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms are guaranteed as demanded by The Law which authorized him to do so.
Reality attests to the fact he has not and had no intention to do anything different at the time of his response
August 14 2006 which clearly indicates the attempt to deceive me and the people should the matter be
brought before the people where he could state truthfully under oath that he was under the misunderstanding
the ORHT proceedings were in progress when actually they were not being finished and done with.
His decline to deal with the issue in Lawyer File # 6 dated March 30 2007 is irrefutable proof to that
endeavor.
It is due to his and others of the government establishment’s persistence to deceive that I compiled the
BLACK BOOK addressed to the Premier and others referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files and my MP Peter
Van Loan among others who have all received copies of the said 15 Lawyer Files which reality attests to the
fact they have all declined to deal with the issues addressed therein, even though the Premier states my
concerns are important to him.
26
Of course this can not be construed to be a lie either because my concerns are important to him as he will
soon realize just how important they are even though he has addressed them in a manner important to him as
stated consistent with the deception and conspiracy of the government establishment against the people they
purport to serve independent of the importance to me of my concerns, obviously the concerns of every
Canadian individual who he is financed and responsible to address their concerns as per his authority and
responsibility under The Law..
And my best wishes to you although I doubt very

much you will be hanged as deserved but a fellow
can’t help but futily wish for the best.
Of course I have addressed the issues to Hon. John

and referred the issues back to the Premier which
persistently accumulate unattended to by the
government personnel whose e-mail and fax
addresses are to be found on the last page herein and
others which will be added to the page in due course
before this publication.
27
__________________________________________________________________________
(8) 2006
Michael Bryant Attorney General Ontario Refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
The Office of the Attorney General of Ontario is behind it all in Ontario as it clearly states on their web site
under the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”
I direct you to http://guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-

freedoms.googlegroups.com/web/Do+your+part.doc where in due course you will come upon page 8 where
you will find a black bar to click on which defines the presumption that deception is a necessity of
Democratic Governments to control the populace to their way of thinking and benefit which the evidence I
have presented irrefutably proves the Government Establishment are persistent to this ideology today which
is illegal and precluded by the Constitution Act, 1982 whereas the Government personnel of authority of the
day ceded to the supremacy of God with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
where the individual is guaranteed equality in all matters before and under The Law including equal
protection and benefits whereas the Federal Government personnel and their assigns of the day became
responsible to support the guarantee in diligent manner due the most significant importance vital to each and
every individual as their well being as guaranteed was dependant on the ability of the Government
(Establishment) to structure a system consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guarantee as provided
in the Charter and demanded by the Constitution (Document), the supreme law of Canada which recognizes
the supremacy of God which therefore affirms Moral issues are to be addressed equally consistent with the
spirit of The Law in the spirit of God where they are one and the same and the spirit of the Constitution
(Establishment personnel) must also be one and the same with the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God to
which the Constitution (Document) attests, either stated or implied.
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” are obvious to be that as to which were in effect
prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and the fact it remains on the web site today unamended and
restructured so as to remove and reassign responsibilities so as to assure the individual’s Charter guarantees
are diligently supported in a manner due the vital importance to the individual proves emphatically and
unequivocally the government personnel of today are as unscrupulous as they were prior to the Constitution
Act, 1982 where the individual and society as a whole were incompetently protected under – the rule of law-
a well established legal principle of the traditionally unscrupulous members of the legal profession who the
Attorney General was a most prominent member who traditionally adhered to the protection of -the rule of
law- as Guardian of that most elusive concept, hard to easily define which lawyers depended on for their
luxurious life styles as they inanely and superfluously debated an individual’s rights at their expense and
ultimately the humongous bill passed on to the tax payer who is guaranteed individually not to be deprived
as provided by the Charter who is and predictably so as the Law Society of Upper Canada adamantly state
or imply their correspondence to me compiled in the document Law Society of Upper Canada to be found
by clicking on the aforesaid to be found on page 8 of the aforesaid http://guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms.googlegroups.com/web/Do+your+part.doc
I reiterate that the Attorney General has been provided all the evidence contained within these writings
including the web sites where the evidence can be found perchance he has misplaced it.
Reality attests to the fact he has not dealt with the issues his web site proclaims his responsibility to do so.
Perchance due the befuddlement it is the responsibility of his agents, the Crown Attorneys I have addressed
the issues to the Newmarket and one of the Toronto Crown Attorneys as per Lawyer Files 13 and 13A
28
(10) January 10 2006
Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge York Regional Police Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
_______________________________________________________________________________________
The York Regional Police are recipients of the evidence referenced within these writings and have demonstrated
extremely well their incompetence to enforce the laws of York Region consistent with and conducive to The Law, the
Constitution which every individual is responsible to abide by and the enforcement officers are responsible to see to it
that every individual accepts their responsibility.
The necessity of each every individual on the Government payroll in the administration and enforcing sector to accept
their responsibility to know The Law is abundantly apparent with the most obvious being impossible to perform
consistent with it as they swear to uphold it.
Having said that the government conspiracy that persists today is due to their persistence to remain ignorant of The
Law they have sworn to uphold to the humongous detriment of the moral society guaranteed by the Constitution
(Document)
Most everyone will cuss and swear in idle fashion which includes the individuals of the Police Forces but to swear to
uphold The Laws of the land which each individual’s guaranteed Charter of Rights is far beyond any realm of idle
swearing which I swear both idly and certain promise they will be held accountable for swearing idly that which they
are responsible to uphold.
It is pathetic how well the Police Forces have extravagantly dipped into the public coffers obviously permitted by the
powers that be to finance Academies to educate their staff and have been pathetically inattentive to The Law which is
their purpose to enforce with integrity FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith which they have no comprehension of
the concept which the evidence irrefutably proves.
I have extracted excerpts from pages 19 and 20 of Lawyer File # 9 being a letter dated January 10 2006 from the York
Regional Police signed by Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who is clearly intent on remaining under the spell of the
Fiction of the Attorney General as he remains persistently consistent to this day being apprised of the evident
referenced within these writings.
He does however pass the blame to the Legislature which is just one of the irresponsible parties implicated in the
government conspiracy against the people.
He attests to the frustration of his Officers and the victims who are consistently declined the Justice warranted due the
evidence and he has promised to bring the issues of my concerns to the proper authorities when asked and I have
retorted as to why he should wait while another victim is illegally deprived and I questioned as to whether or not he
has addressed the issues previously considering his Officers have learned through considerable experience that which
is acceptable as to be the “Threshold” an invisible line determined at random by the courts which separates who is
likely to have a stab at justice in a Legal System where Justice is impossible to achieve as the evidence contained and
referenced herein irrefutably proves.
I have also requested he respond to define what the term “Threshold” means in relation to the evidence I have
presented with regards to the issues in addressed on page 1 (1) with no response ultimately implicating him to the
conspiracy or as Confucius says in so many ways which the following is one
“To see what is right and not do it is want of courage or of principle”
or as I say down right ignorant and proof of his ignorance of The Law he is responsible to uphold leaving the
individual and ultimately every individual deprived as the coffers of public funds are consistently pilfered
and wasted due his and others akin refusal to accept their responsibility conducive to the guaranteed moral
society promised by the Constitution (Document) which they have sworn to uphold.
29
30
31
(11) November 15 2006
Sheldon Prior Ontario Commission on Police Services Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
Sheldon Prior of the Ontario Commission on Police Services cites Ontario laws enacted to address such
issues found herein in a manner consistent with and conducive to the government conspiracy so as to appear
to the people legitimate to purpose which indeed they are legitimate to the persistence of the government
conspiracy which of course is illegitimate to The Law they are responsible to and most certainly will be held
accountable as assuredly as they have absconded with public funds and taken to the bank can they take the
promise of the Constitution (Document) and bank on it with an extraordinary interest as one by one the
individual awakens from the spell initiated by the Attorney General.
With all that has been said within Lawyer File # 10 and all the evidence referenced herein, there is no need
to expand further on their part in the government conspiracy which would only serve to delay the Justice
long waited by the individual’s of the moral majority who are of the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God
as they must be to be incompliance with the spirit of the Constitution the foundation of Canada which bears
so many holes perpetrated by the government personnel of the conspiracy which persistently bang away at
the very foundation of the spirit of Canada which is a most pathetic demonstration of treason irrefutably
proven by the evidence which they have so unwittingly provided assuring either the Credibility of the
evidence or the Credibly of their incredible incompetence to structure a Legal System consistent with and
conducive to the supreme law of Canada where the government personnel must be irreproachable to the
endeavor and are responsible and most certainly will be held accountable as one by one the unmandated
become alert to the fact they have been inundated by the perpetual snow job of the conspirators and willingly
admit to the fact in perseverance of their individual guaranteed Charter Rights which suddenly become
important to them as they are charged individually with treason for their part in the government conspiracy
where the people will be more than reluctant to pay for their defense should they allow the certain eventually
to evolve without their spilling the beans so to speak as to who put them up to it granting them asylum and
continued promise of the pension they so dearly covet and the wages and benefits they have come to know
and so preciously yearn for continuity to that endeavor.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(12) March 30 2006

General Details the crimes committed - reference to government conspiracy
Evidence
(13) April 1 2007

General The world according to mean appeal for sanity
Evidence

_______________________________________________________________________________________
These are worthwhile reads if you have not yet shed the spell for as sure as I am certain there is a God in
Heaven which will be believable to all when The Law is administered and enforced in His spirit as
demanded by The Law which authorized your mandates to perform in the service of The Law it demands it
shall for it is written and so shall it be forever and ever. Do I hear an Amen? We are waiting impatiently.
32
I remind you all this is a legitimate Public Trial under the authority
of the Constitution (Document) whereas the evidence referenced herein
has been provided to the government personnel referenced herein
providing them the opportunity to respond in their defense to the
accusations alleged herein and due their persistence to retain the
consistency loyal to the government conspiracy against the people
obviously inconsistent with their obligations to The Law and the
Canadian people I will have no choice but to find you all guilty as
charged.
Given the very serious nature of the charges I provide you this final
opportunity to make peace with your conscience and ultimately peace with
the moral majority most generously providing you the opportunity to
redeem yourselves in the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God who are
as one as the Constitution (Document)
As per tradition in matters of The Law I have taken the initiative to

address the issues to the supreme court of Canada and the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada having provided them the
opportunity to address the issues as the Federal Government authority
whereas the Prime Minister Stephen Harper the peoples most highest
representative of authority has declined my invitation to act as the
people’s representative as he has been elected, accepted financial
benefit and sworn to uphold The Law responsibly consistent with The Law
and upon his refusal to do so has willingly left the decision to the
people as to how to deal with the issues and he will be held accountable
in accordance with The Law and I offer his response (see page 36)to my
e-mail to him dated July 19 2007 where his office responds trusting I
will understand that his office is unable to intervene in any way or
provide me with direct assistance in this matter.
I would like to take this opportunity to assure him I am worthy of his

trust and to extend the courtesy to offer that I trust he will
understand that I trust him to be consistent with and conducive to the
government conspiracy and in fact I trust him to play a major role as
his one and only response clearly states or implies that he can not be
trusted and I do not trust him as he is as inconsistent with his
responsibility to uphold The Law as all the other government
conspirators which the evidence referenced herein is irrefutable to that
most obvious conclusion.
The issues I have addressed are specifically addressed as to the

incompetence of the government personnel to address the issues of
government incompetence and the government conspiracy perpetrated
against the Canadian people where each individual is not being protected
in all matters before and under The Law as guaranteed and provided in
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which the Federal Government
and its assigns made signed sealed and delivered to the Canadian people
in the form of a guarantee which is obviously the Federal Government’s
responsibility to back the guarantee being the guarantors where common
33
sense and common law demands the guarantor back the guarantee and be
able to demonstrate due diligence to that endeavor.
It is irrational for his Office to even suggest that the issues are of
my personal responsibility requesting the Prime Minister help me
personally when the issues are of such compromise to the well being of
every individual in Canada whereas the evidence has been gathered during
the course of my individual trek for the original purpose of the
acquisition of personal Justice consistent with and conducive to The Law
but once coherent to the government conspiracy and the realization
justice was an improbable conclusion by the present Legal System
personnel as the evidence collected along the way irrefutably proves it
was my intention to help the Prime Minister by providing him the
irrefutable evidence of the government conspiracy even though his Office
has stated fat chance of him helping me.
I gave him an opportunity to back that which he inferred when he enacted

the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 giving him the benefit of the doubt
devoid of sanity where the evidence is irrefutable to the fact that the
government personnel are in on a conspiracy together against the
individuals of Canada of the moral majority.
The very fact he enacted the Federal Accountability Act, 1982 is proof
alone he is aware of the irresponsible unaccountable attitude of the
government personnel but The Law is already in place which demands
responsible personnel be accountable and by enacting the Federal
Accountability Act, 2006 is consistent with and conducive to the
governments persistence to the conspiracy as they would have the people
believe they are acting in good conscience for the benefit of the
people, they who have no conscience and do everything for their benefit
at the extravagant expense to the people.
So in adjourning the Public Trial for today I request you all study and
review the evidence as if your individual person’s well being is the
issue at stake for it is indeed as the evidence clearly indicates and we
meet again which you will be duly notified I request any evidence or
responses in your defense where at that time they will be considered
before final judgment is passed where I reiterate the present available
evidence is conclusive of every persons mentioned and referenced herein
is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt where your reasoning has already
been proven inept to the purpose.
Once again I remind you your right to an appeal with the supreme court
of Canada is under way and the evidence to be found at the top of the
page of my web site http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms has already been presented and I highly
suggest you study this evidence well in conjunction with all the
evidence I have presented you before you respond to me in dispute of
that which has been alleged and ultimately proven to be conclusive with
no possible response available to absolve you of that which the evidence
irrefutably proves with just one conceivable exception.
34
Admit to your role in the conspiracy with explanation as to your
involvement and respond as to how you intend to correct and atone for
your part in the conspiracy, whereas I will study your proposal and upon
acceptance and determined course of action you will endeavor FFF.
Couldn’t be fairer than that? Right?

After all you have been paid to do it since the commencement of your
employ and there is no time like the present. Is there?
It will find you in good stead in retention of your splendid benefits

and pension rather that immediate loss of all and more as you are made
to pay for your own defense and serve due punishment due your part in
the crime.
Can’t be a whole lot to think about. Right?
Well don’t just sit there appearing to think about it

It won’t work any more and let’s face it.
It is a most worthy cause which you can relate to.
Yes, that’s right. It is you who will suffer the consequences of your
decisions this time.
No matter your decision you will never be associated to or as an

innocent victim.
Make the wrong decision and you will receive your just reward.
Make the right decision and you will receive your unjust reward as
promised commonly known as plea bargaining for the ultimate purpose of
getting to the bottom as to who is at the top.
It’s all some what of a befuddlement isn’t it?
Anyway, those people who make the right decision will remain anonymous
until a clear and definite plan is established to accomplish the
endeavor and of course once the initiative is under way will have the
full support of the spirit of The Law, the spirit of God and of course
let us not forget each and every individual of the moral majority who
will welcome you into their arms as you help lead the way in the
restructured government consistent with the spirit of The Law conducive
to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights as it should be in a
country whose Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God.
How could it possibly get any better than that?
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
35
To: Frank Gallagher
Subject: Office of the Prime Minister / Cabinet du Premier ministre
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
On behalf of the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, I would like to acknowledge receipt
of your correspondence regarding your personal affairs.
While careful consideration has been given to your description of the difficulties you
have experienced, I trust you will understand that this office is unable to intervene
in any way or provide you with direct assistance in this matter.
I regret that my response could not be more favourable.
M. Bredeson
Executive Correspondence Officer
for the Prime Minister's Office
Agent de correspondance
de la haute direction pour le Cabinet du Premier ministre
>>> From : Frank Gallagher frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca Received : 19 Jul

2007 05:59:27 PM >>>
July 19, 2007
Dear Prime Minister
I have written you about certain issues which surely must be of your concern
and I think it incomprehensible and unethical that you have not responded to
me and at the very least I would expect acknowledgement as to receipt.
I have attached a file for your personal attention which should draw your
personal attention to all that I have previously written you
Including copies of my15 Lawyer Files which you have declined to act upon
let alone acknowledge which leaves me in disrespect for you equally as you
have held me in disrespect as you do equally the majority of individuals who
have elected you in trust that you would represent them fairly in respect of
the Constitution which governs us all including you.
I request you acknowledge receipt of this and other documents I previously

sent and state your intentions.
I have requested you forward the documentation on to the Commissioner of

Conflict of Interest and Ethics Mary Elizabeth Dawson and I would like to
know if you have done so.
I expect you to oversee the proceedings to ensure they are carried out in
the spirit intended.
The conclusion of these proceedings will reveal the truth as to the intended
spirit, deceit or in the spirit of the Constitution.
Respectfully to the Spirit of the Constitution
Frank Gallagher
36
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.com;cit
y@thestar.ca; christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org;fu
reyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht@sen
.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcrivest
@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca;m
unsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;vanlo
p1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-
ccm.gc.ca
rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;

Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca;
ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca;
plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca; info@police.york.on.ca;
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; cba-mba@mts.net;
admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca;
info@oba.org; cba-pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
Robert D Scott Office of the Commissioner, OPP Julian Fantino Commission Public
Assistant Crown Attorney M.M. Marc) Bedard Complaints On Line
Newmarket Staff Sgt. RCMP
Fax 905- 853-4849 705- 329-6195
37

Mad Glad Mostly Sad WHY

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mad Glad Mostly Sad WHY

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

November 12 2007

We can not go higher until we Lower the Bar

(6) August 16 2006

(10) January 10 2006

(11) November 15 2006

(12) March 30 2006

- Lawyer File # 11 March 30 2007

(13) April 1 2007

- Lawyer File # 12 March 30 2007

(16) April 7 2007

Fiction is Realized by All in Good Faith

Who is to demand it if not us, we the people of Canada?

Remember we can not go higher until we Lower the Bar

Maybe you would like to take a kick at the Bar

Go ahead, it’s FREE

Just click on Do your part.doc and then simply do your part

Damn, almost wet my pants

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-

They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

This is fundamental to the foundation and spirit of Canada

Due to the befuddlement of circumstance where the evidence referenced in these

The evidence being irrefutable as to their negligence in performance of their mandates

Due Regard to the credibility of the evidence

So again the question WHY?

So now what do you think?

“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”

Just think, I mean really, Just think.

Okay you have done it and don’t get it.

WHY? Is the question that persistently pops up.

It’s something one isn’t likely to want to think about, is it?

So life goes on to death.

That’s just “How it is” Right?

(6) August 16 2006

Do any of you do anything other than nothing or direct traffic?

Think about it.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

Think about it.

See Lawyer File # 4

And my best wishes to you although I doubt very

Of course I have addressed the issues to Hon. John

I direct you to http://guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-

(12) March 30 2006

- Lawyer File # 11 March 30 2007

(13) April 1 2007

- Lawyer File # 12 March 30 2007

As per tradition in matters of The Law I have taken the initiative to

I would like to take this opportunity to assure him I am worthy of his

The issues I have addressed are specifically addressed as to the

I gave him an opportunity to back that which he inferred when he enacted

Couldn’t be fairer than that? Right?

It will find you in good stead in retention of your splendid benefits

Can’t be a whole lot to think about. Right?

Well don’t just sit there appearing to think about it

No matter your decision you will never be associated to or as an

It’s all some what of a befuddlement isn’t it?

How could it possibly get any better than that?

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

I regret that my response could not be more favourable.

>>> From : Frank Gallagher frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca Received : 19 Jul

July 19, 2007