You are on page 1of 101

Chemical Reaction Engineering

Reactor Design

Jayant M. Modak
Department of Chemical Engineering
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Chemical Reactor Design

Objectives
q Technological
n Maximum possible product in minimum time
n Desired quantity in minimum time
n Maximum possible product in desired time
q Economic
n Maximize profit
Chemical Reactor Design

Constraints
q Market
n Raw materials availability quality and quantity
n Demand for the product
q Society/Legislative
n Safety
n Pollution control
q Technological
n Thermodynamics
n Stoichiometry
n Kinetics
Chemical Reactor Design - Decisions

Type of reactor
q Tubular, Fixed Bed, Stirred tank, Fluidized bed
Mode
q Mass Flow: Batch, Continuous, Semibatch
q Energy: Isothermal, Adiabatic, Co/counter current
Process Intensification
q Combining more than one type of unit operation
Tubular reactor mass balance

C j C j
+ ( Flux j ) = R j + ( uC j + J j ) = R j
t z t z


M jC j + u M jC j + M j J j = M j R j
t j z j j j

f
+ ( u f ) = 0
t x

Indian Institute of Science


Tubular reactor energy balance

1
(CTU ) + FT H + A H j J j = Q
t A z j
C j T
(CTU ) = (CT H P ) = H j + C jCPj
t t j t j t
F j T
( FT H ) = H j + FjCPj
z j z j z
J j H j
H jJ j = H j + J j
z j j z j z

Indian Institute of Science


Tubular reactor energy balance

C j 1 F j J j
H j + +A = H j R j = H i ri
j t A z z j i
T T
C jCPj +u
j t u
4
Q = U (Tr T )
dt
T T 4
C jCPj + u + H i ri = U (Tr T )
j t u i dt

Indian Institute of Science


Stirred tank reactor mass and energy balance

dN j
= Fj 0 F je + R j
dt
dT
N jCPj = F j 0 ( H j 0 H je ) + V ( H i ) ri + AKU (Tr T )
j dt j i

Indian Institute of Science


Fixed bed reactor mass balance

t
( BC j ) + ( B Flux j ) = qmj
z
Cj
t
( BC j ) + usC j Dej ,s f
z z f
= qmj

T T 2T 4
C jCPj + us e 2 + qh = U (Tr T )
j t z z dt

1 Y ( Dej,r , C j )
rX ( X ,Y ) =
r r (e,r , T )
Psuedohomogenous model

qmj = R j
qh = H i ri
i

Indian Institute of Science


Heterogenous model external diffusion

qmj = K g (C j C js )gngAp = K g av (C j C js )
3
av = (1 B )
R
qh = h f av (T Ts )
K g av (C j C js ) = R j (C js , Ts )
h f av (T Ts ) = H i ri
i

Indian Institute of Science


Heterogenous model internal diffusion


1 2 ' C '

= R j (C j , T )
j ' ' '
r Dej
r r
2
r
1 2 ' T '


r 2 r
r e
r i
= ii
H r '

C 'j
qmj = Dej' av = R j ( C j )
r r=R

qh = i ( H i ) ri
i

Indian Institute of Science


Non-isothermal reactors - PFR

2.0
1.5 Adiabatic
Isothermal
1.0
0.5
Concentration

0.0
0 10 20 30 40
2 350

Concentration
1 temperature
325

0 300
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Time (min)

Indian Institute of Science


Non-isothermal reactors - CSTR

Concentration Temperature 340

320

300
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Residence time
Non-isothermal reactors - rate

8 r1

6
1/rate

0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
C10-C1

Indian Institute of Science


Trajectories - Exothermic reaction

1.0
Isothermal

0.8

0.6 Adiabatic
Xeq

0.4

0.2

0.0
300 320 340 360 380 400
T

Indian Institute of Science


Trajectories - Endothermic reaction
1.0

0.8

0.6 Adiabatic
Isothermal
Xeq

0.4

0.2

0.0
300 320 340 360 380 400
T

Indian Institute of Science


Optimal temperature trajectories
10

1
Rate

0.1

0.01 100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
conversion
10
1/rate
1

0.1

0.01
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
conversion
Optimal temperature
500

0.9 450

0.8 400

0.7 350

0.6 300
Extent

0.5 250

0.4 200

0.3 150

0.2 100

0.1 50

0
450 500 550 600 650 700
Temperature K

Indian Institute of Science


Thermal cracking of ethane in tubular reactor

Ethylene demands polyethylene, ethylene oxide,


ethylene glycol 20 million tons per annum

Main Reaction C2 H6 C2 H4 + H2 increase in


number of moles so steam as inert

Endothermic reaction - H 34.5 kcal/mol, high


temperature for high equilibrium conversions,
increasing temperatures along the length of the
reactor
2C2 H6 C3 H8 + CH 4
Side reactions higher
conversion yield of side products higher
Indian Institute of Science
Yield conversion diagram for ethane cracking

Indian Institute of Science


Ethane cracking reactor

Typical operating condn


L = 95 m
G = 68.68 kg/m2/s
P inlet 2.99 atm, outlet 1.2 atm
T inlet 680, outlet 820 C
Production 10000 tons/coil

Indian Institute of Science


Balances

dF j d t2
mass = Rj
dz 4
dT 1 d t2
energy =
dz F jC pj
q( z ) d t +
4 i
( H i )ri

j

dp 2 f du
momentum = +
f u 2
+ u
dz d t rb i
f
dz
RT F j
F' 1
u= = j

A A p

Simulation of ethane reactor
Hydrogenation of oil

Major demand margarine, shortenings, vanaspati

Vegetable oils mixture of triglycerides - glycerol


and fatty acids

Fatty acids saturated (S) , monosaturated (cis, R1


and trans, R2) and diunsaturated (B). Hydrogenation
to reduce odor or color, improve stability and
increase melting point.

Product requirements some polyunsaturated


(health) and R2 ( consistency and higher melting
points)
Reactions

r1 r4 C , r5 r6 CH 2
1/ 2
H2

implies selectivity of monounsaturates over


saturates proportional to (CH2)1/2
Yield conversion diagrams
Balances

dC j
mass = Rj j = B, R1 , R2 , M
dt
( ) (
k Lav CH 2 , g CH 2 ,s = RH 2 C j , CH 2 ,s )
dCH 2 ,b
dt
( ) (
= k L a v C H 2 , g C H 2 ,b k S a S C H 2 ,b C H 2 , s )
( )
0 = k S aS CH 2 ,b CH 2 ,s + RH 2
1 1 1
= +
k L av k L av k S a S
Stirred tank batch reactor
Desired conversion
batch time
Desired production rate
and batch time
volume
Based on volume
internal design
Cooling load
Q = V ( Hi )ri = AKU (T Tr )
i
Ammonia synthesis

Major demand Fertilizer, chemicals,


explosives, polyamides, pharmaceuticals;
150 million tons per annum
Main reaction
1 3
N 2 + H 2 ! NH 3 , !H 298 K = "45.7 kJ / mol "1
2 2

High pressure, low temperatures


favorable
Catalytic reaction iron, promoted
ruthenium
Ammonia synthesis equilibrium

1.0 1.0
T = 473 K
0.9
P = 300 atm
(A) 0.9 (B)
523
0.8 0.8
Ammonia Mol fraction

Ammonia Mol fraction


573
0.7 0.7
200
0.6 0.6 623
100
0.5 0.5
673
0.4 50 0.4
0.3 0.3 723

0.2 10 0.2 773


3
0.1 0.1
1
0.0 0.0
500 600 700 800 900 0 100 200 300
Temperature (K) Pressure (Atm)

Indian Institute of Science


Ammonia synthesis - balances

dC j
mass us = R j (C j ,T )
dz
dT 4U
energy f us c p = (Tr T ) + ( H ) r
dz dt
1 d 2 dCi'
= i( i )
' '
2 r Die R C , T
r dr dr
catalyst
1 d 2 dT '
2 r e = H r
r dr dr

Indian Institute of Science


Reactor simulation
0.7 860
0.6 840
820
0.5 N2
mol fraction

800

temperature
0.4 H2 780
0.3 NH3 760
0.2 740
720
0.1
700
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 680
0 1 2 3 4 5
Length (m) Length (m)

120
100 rate at bulk conditions
observed rate
80
60
rate

40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Length (m)

Indian Institute of Science


Optimal temperature
500

0.9 450

0.8 400

0.7 350

0.6 300
Extent

0.5 250

0.4 200

0.3 150

0.2 100

0.1 50

0
450 500 550 600 650 700
Temperature K

Indian Institute of Science


Fixed bed reactors

Indian Institute of Science


Ammonia Multibed reactor

1.0
r=0
r/ T=0
0.8 Reactor 1
Reactor 2
Conversion

Reactor 3
0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0
400 500 600 700 800 900
Temperature

Indian Institute of Science


Fixed bed reactors

Indian Institute of Science


Ammonia Autothermal

300 1000
Ttop-T1L
Ttop-Tfeed
250 900
473
491
200 513 800
523

Tfeed K
150 578 700
623

100 600

50 500

0 400
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Ttop Ttop K

Indian Institute of Science


Ammonia Autothermal

800

750
0.8
700 0.7 r=0
Conversion

0.6 r/ T=0
650

Conversion
0.5
600 0.4
reactor
0.3
550 heat exchanger 0.2
500 0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 600 650 700 750 800 850 900

Length Temperature

Indian Institute of Science


Process intensification

Strategy of reduction in physical size of a


chemical plant while achieving given
objective
30 40 years old concept, reinvented in last
decade due to intense competition, scarce
resources and stricter environmental norms
Multifunctional reactive systems several
functions are designed to occur
simultaneously.
Major drive in refining and petrochemicals
sector
Indian Institute of Science
Catalyst particle in reacting media
Type A at catalyst level
Type B at interphase
transport level
Type C at intra-reactor
level separations/heat
transfer
Type D inter-reactor
level by combining two
reactor operation with
solids recirculation.

Indian Institute of Science


Type A Example bifunctional catalysis

Catalytic reforming to increase the octane


number
Conversion of parafins, cyclo parafins and
napthenes to aromatics and branced
paraffins.
Reactions involved dehydrogenation,
cyclization and isomerization
Pt/SiO2 catalyst

Indian Institute of Science


Type B Example Gas induction reactors

DRAFT TUBE STATOR


GAS- LIQUID
DISPERSION

GAS ENTRANCE

DRAFT TUBE STATOR

GAS -LIQUID
SELF INDUCING DISPERSION
IMPELLER DISPERSING
IMPELLER

SUSPENDING
IMPELLER

Indian Institute of Science


Type C Intra-reactor operation

Energy transfer reaction in heat exchanger


Momentum transfer radial flow reactors
Mass transfer reactive- distillation,
absorption

Indian Institute of Science


Type C Momentum transfer

High
gas flow rates ammonia synthesis,
styrene from ethylbenzene, flue gas
treatments

Indian Institute of Science


Type C Mass transfer
Enhance conversion in equilibrium limited
reaction, prevent undesirable reaction,
increase rate of product inhibited reactions

Indian Institute of Science


Type C Energy transfer
CH 4 + H 2O CO + 3H 2 H = 206 kJ / mol 0.30

CH 4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2 H 2O H = 803 kJ / mol 0.25

Temperature
0.20
0.15 Flue gas
Process
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Length

840

800

Temperature
760 Flue gas
Process
720

680

640
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Length

Indian Institute of Science


Type C Example styrene synthesis

Indian Institute of Science


Design considerations and safety

Indian Institute of Science


Multiplicity in stirred tank reactor

Indian Institute of Science


Explosion in batch reactor

Indian Institute of Science


Runaway/Hot spot in tubular reactor

Indian Institute of Science


Runaway/Hot spot in tubular reactor

0.020 800
0.012 0.012
0.015 0.015
0.016 0.016
0.015
partial pressure

0.0175 0.0175

temperature
0.0176 700 0.0176
0.0181 0.0181
0.010

0.005 600

0.000 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4


0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Length Length

Indian Institute of Science


Runaway/Hotspot in tubular reactors

0.020

Partial pressure
0.016 Sensitive

0.012

0.008
Insensitive
0.004

610 620 630 640 650 660


temperature

Indian Institute of Science


q < p2 / 4 q > p2 / 4
1,2 = 1, 2 1,2 = i
'' < 0 <0 q = p2 / 4
q=det (A)

q > p2 / 4
1,2 = i
>0
p=tr (A)
q < p /4
2

q < p2 / 4 1,2 = 1, 2 > 0


1,2 = 1, 2
1 > 0, 1 > 2

Indian Institute of Science


Stability analysis

A state X=0 is said to be stable when given


e>0, there exists a d>0 (0<d<e) such that if ||X
(0)||<d then ||X(t)|| < e for all t>0
A state X=0 is said to be asymptotically
attractive when given m>0, such that if ||X(0)||
<m then lim (t) ||X(t)|| =0
A state is asymptotically stable when stable
and asymptotically attractive.
A state is marginally stable when stable but
not asymptotically attractive

Indian Institute of Science


Examples
dx x2 ( y x ) + y5 dx
= =y
dt 1 + x 2 + y 2 + ( x 2 + y 2 )2 dt
y2 ( y 2x) dy
dy = x
= dt
dt 1 + x 2 + y 2 + ( x 2 + y 2 )2

1.0
1.2
1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6
0.6 0.4
0.2
0.0

Y
0.4 -0.2
Y

-0.4
-0.6
0.2
-0.8
-1.0
0.0 -1.2
-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
X
X

Indian Institute of Science


Two dimensional system - Eigen values
T T2
2 T + D = 0 1,2 = D
2 4

2
T /4-D=0
D=determinant(A)

Unstable
Stable focus
focus
Stable Unstable
node node

0
T=trace(A)

Indian Institute of Science


Unstable node
2
T /4-D=0

D=determinant(A)
Unstable
Stable focus
focus

= 0.1 D = 0.00971, T = 0.988 = 0.0099,0.9782


Stable Unstable
node node

0
T=trace(A)

45 0.10
40
0.08
35
30 0.06
alpha

beta
25 0.04
20
0.02
15
10 0.00
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time Time

0.10

0.08

0.06
beta

0.04

0.02

0.00
10 20 30 40 50
alpha

Indian Institute of Science


2
T /4-D=0

D=determinant(A)
Unstable focus Stable
node
Stable
focus
Unstable
focus

Unstable
node

= 0.5 D = 0.248, T = 0.751 = 0.3756 0.3276i


0
T=trace(A)

350 3.0
300
2.5
250
2.0
200
1.5
alpha

150

beta
100 1.0
50
0.5
0
-50 0.0
-50 0 50100150200250300350400450500550600650700750 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time Time

10
3.0 8 linearized process
2.5 6 real process
4
2.0
2
1.5 0
beta

beta
-2
1.0
-4
0.5 -6
0.0 -8
-10
-10 0 10 20 30 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
alpha alpha

Indian Institute of Science


Stable focus
2
T /4-D=0

D=determinant(A)
Unstable
Stable focus
focus

= 2.0 D = 3.99, T = 2.98 = -1.4900 1.3288i


Stable Unstable
node node

0
T=trace(A)

2.1
0.80
2.0
0.75
1.9
0.70
1.8
0.65
alpha

beta
0.60 1.7

0.55 1.6

0.50 1.5

0.45 1.4
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time Time

2.1

2.0 0.3

1.9
0.2
1.8
alpha
beta

1.7
0.1
1.6

1.5 0.0
1.4
0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
alpha alpha

Indian Institute of Science


Stable node
2
T /4-D=0

D=determinant(A)
Unstable
Stable focus
focus

= 2.5 D = 6.23, T = -5.21 = -3.3614, -1.8525


Stable Unstable
node node

0
T=trace(A)

0.65 2.5
2.4
0.60
2.3
0.55
2.2
alpha

beta
0.50 2.1

0.45 2.0
1.9
0.40
1.8
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time Time

2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
beta

2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65
alpha

Indian Institute of Science


Limit cycle
2
T /4-D=0

D=determinant(A)
Unstable
Stable focus
focus

= 1.005 D = 1.01, T = 0 = 1.003i


Stable Unstable
node node

0
T=trace(A)

1.6 1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2 1.2
1.1
alpha

beta
1.0
1.0

0.8 0.9
0.8
0.6 0.7
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time Time

1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
beta

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
alpha

Indian Institute of Science


Adiabatic CSTR

100 Heat generation


Heat removal
=60 s
80
=10 s
= 100 s
60
rate

40

20

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Indian Institute of Science


Adiabatic CSTR steady state multiplicity

1.0 10 Steady Eigenvalue


state s
0.8 8 0.08996,
0.61698 1.6710-2 ,

temperature
conversion

0.6 6 8.6810-3
0.4957 1.6710-2
0.4 4 7.0510-3
conversion 3.4
0.2 temperature 2 0.7628 1.7410-2
5.2318 1.6610-2
0.0 0
0 40 80 120 160 200
residence time

Indian Institute of Science


Adiabatic CSTR phase plane, transient

14

12

10
Temperature

0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Conversion

Indian Institute of Science


Non-ideal flow, mixing and reactions

If, we know precisely what is happening within the


vessel, thus, if we have a complete velocity distribution
map for the fluid in the vessel, then we should, in
principle, be able to predict the behavior of a vessel as a
reactor. Unfortunately, this approach is impractical, even
in today s computer age. Levenspiel, Chemical
Reaction Engineering, 1999.

Mobil Adds Million-Dollar Benefits by Using Flow


Simulation to Optimize Refinery Units, Greg Muldowney,
Mobil Technology Company, 2007

Indian Institute of Science


CFD modeling of bioreactors

Bioreactor
performance: interactive relation
between biosystem and physical environment
q Biotic phase: complex machinary inside cell and
its regulation by external environment
q Abiotic phase: multiphase system with complex
interactions of mass, momentum and energy
leading to environmental gradients in space and
time

Indian Institute of Science


Anaerobic digestion
Complex polymers
Fermentative B.
HYDROLYSIS
and Monomers
ACIDOGENESIS 4
20 76 Acidogenic B.
Volatils fatty acids
(VFA), alcohols, ...
ACETOGENESIS Acetogenic B.
52 24
Acetate CO2 + H2

METHANOGENESIS Homoacetogenic B.
72 Acetoclastic B. Hydrogenophilic B. 28

CH4 + CO2 CH +H O
4 Science
2
Indian Institute of
CFD modeling of anaerobic bioreactor

Biogas out
0.15
1 Gas
0.15 1.2 Leafy biomass Treated water out

Waste water in
1.4 water
y
x
6
Indian Institute of Science
Results & Discussion

Vector plot for liquid velocity (m/s) Contour plot for liquid velocity (m/s)
(with Packed bed) (with Packed bed)

Indian Institute of Science


PIV experiments

Indian Institute of Science


Experimental verification

Contours of X-direction mean velocity (inlet NRe=7660) (a)experimental and (b ) Simulation


results without packed bed

Indian Institute of Science


Experimental verification

Contours of X-direction mean velocity (inlet NRe=500) (a)experimental and (b ) Simulation


results with packed bed

Indian Institute of Science


Improving the performance

Indian Institute of Science


Non-ideal flow, mixing and reactions

Indian Institute of Science


Non-ideal flow, mixing and reactions

Indian Institute of Science


Non-ideal flow, mixing and reactions

Indian Institute of Science


Residence time distributions
Exit age distribution E(t)dt
q Fraction of material in exit stream which has age
between t and t+dt
Cumulative residence time distribution, F(t)
q Fraction of material in exit stream with age less
than t
Internal age distribution, I(t)dt
q Fraction of material within vessel which has age
between
t t and t+dt
dF (t ) V
F (t ) = E (t ')dt ' or = E (t ), 1 F (t ) = I (t )
0
dt F'

Indian Institute of Science


Means and moments of distribution
Mean residence time

t = tE (t )dt E (t )dt ' = tE (t )dt
0 0 0

Variance

( )
2
= t t E (t )dt
2

Skewness

( )
2
s = t t E (t )dt
3 3/ 2

Indian Institute of Science


Example

0.20 1.0

0.8
0.15
0.6
E(t)

F(t)
0.10
0.4
0.05
0.2
0.00 0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
t t

0.20 0.8

0.15 0.6
t E(t)
I(t)

0.10
0.4

0.05
0.2

0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
t
t

Indian Institute of Science


Experimental determination of RTD
Convolution integral
t t
Ce (t ) = Co (t t ') E (t ')dt = Co (t ') E (t t ')dt
0 0

Pulse input

E (t ) = Ce (t ) C (t ) dt
0
e

Step input

F (t ) = Ce (t ) C0

Indian Institute of Science


Determination of RTD from model
CSTR
1
E (t ) = exp ( t )

PFR

E (t ) = (t ), F (t ) = H (t )

PFR-CSTR or CSTR-PFR
0 t <p
E (t ) = 1 t p
exp t p
s s
Indian Institute of Science
RTD and reactions

kinetics of the reaction


the RTD of fluid in the reactor
the earliness or lateness of fluid mixing in the
reactor
whether the fluid is a micro or macro fluid

Indian Institute of Science


Example second order reaction
CSTR-PF
1.0 PF-CSTR
PF
0.8 CSTR
PF(=4)
CSTR(=4 )
0.6
C/C0

0.4

0.2

0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10
k C0

Indian Institute of Science


Macro- and Micromixing

Macromixing distribution of residence times


in the reactor
Micromixing description of how molecules
of different ages interaction with each other
q Complete segregation all molecules of same
age group remain together until they exit the
reactor
q Complete micromixing molecules of different
age group are completely mixed
theearliness or lateness of fluid mixing in the
reactor
whether the fluid is a micro or macro fluid
Indian Institute of Science
Zero parameter models

Complete segregation


Cs = C (t ) E (t )dt
0

Indian Institute of Science


Model

dC
= R(C ) C (0) = C0 Cs = C (t ) E (t )dt
dt 0

dCs
= C (t ) E (t ) Cs (0) = 0
dt

z dC dC dz 2 dc
t= t ( 0, ) z ( 0,1) = = (1 z )
z 1 dt dz dt dz
dC R (C )
=
dz (1 z )2
dCs E ( z 1 z )
= C
(1 z )
2
dz

Indian Institute of Science


Zero parameter models

Maxiumum mixedness

dC E ( )
= R(C ) (C10 C ) C ( = 0) = C10
d 1 F ( )

Indian Institute of Science


Example second order reaction
1.0 0.4
maximum mixedness
complete segregation maximum mixedness
0.8 2 CSTRs complete segregation
2 CSTRs

0.6
C/C0

0.2
0.4

0.2

0.0 0.0
1 10 100 1000
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
k C0

Indian Institute of Science


Example mass transfer and reaction
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.8 CA (r=1m)

Concentration
0.4 CB
CA (r=100m)
0.6
0.3
CAe

CB

0.2 0.4

0.1
maximum mixedness
segregated flow
0.2

0.0 0.0
1 10 100 1000 10000
r( m) 0 2 4 6 8 10

Indian Institute of Science


One parameter models

Tanks in - series

N N t n1 nt 1
E (t ) = exp 2 =
( N 1)! N N

Indian Institute of Science


One parameter models

Axial dispersion model

1 1
= 1 (1 e Pe )
2

Pe Pe

Indian Institute of Science


RTD

7
1.4 10
6
1.2
1 5 500 dispersion model
1.0 1 4 2
3 4
0.8 2 4

E(t)
E(t)

3
0.6
2
0.4 40
0 5
1
0.2
0
0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 2
t
t

Indian Institute of Science


Transient in PFR
t
1.0 0
0.25
0.5
0.8 0.75
:
:
0.6 2.5
C

0.4

0.2

0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
z

Indian Institute of Science


Compartment models

Indian Institute of Science


Example
1.0 1.0

0.8 0.8
ConversionA

1 CSTR
0.6 0.6 2 CSTR

YieldB
1 CSTR
0.4 2 CSTR 0.4

0.2 0.2

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Indian Institute of Science


Rate contours reversible reaction

0
0.9

0.8

0.7
0.1

0
0.6
'

0.5

0.4 0.1
0 .1

0.3
1
0

0.2
1

0.1
0.1
110 0
10

100
0 100
0.1 101 0
300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400

Temperature

Indian Institute of Science


Fludized bed catalytic convertors

Indian Institute of Science


Fluidised bed reactor

Indian Institute of Science


Solid volume fraction

Indian Institute of Science

You might also like