Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UP 2010 Civil Law (Private International Law) PDF
UP 2010 Civil Law (Private International Law) PDF
Chapter VII. Nationality................................436 Chapter XIV. Torts and Crimes ................... 453
I. Determination of Nationality ..............436 I. Torts .................................................. 453
II. Procedure for Naturalization .............436 II. Crimes............................................... 454
III. Loss of Philippine Citizenship ...........437
IV. Problems in Applying the Nationality Chapter XV. Torts and Crimes .................... 455
Principle .....................................................438 I. Personal Law of Corporations .......... 455
426
II. Domicile/Residence of Corporations 455
Chapter IX. Principles on Personal Status Chapter XVI. Foreign Judgments ............... 457
and Capacity.................................................441 I. Recognition v. Enforcement.............. 457
I. Definition ...........................................441 II. Bases of Recognition and Enforcement
II. Beginning and End of Personality.....441 457
III. Absence ............................................441 III. Policy of Preclusion Underlying
IV. Name.................................................442 Recognition and Enforcement ................... 457
V. Age of Majority ..................................442 IV. Requisites for Recognition or
VI. Capacity ............................................442 Enforcement .............................................. 457
V. Procedures for Enforcement ............. 457
Chapter X. Family Relations........................443 VI. Effect of Foreign Judgment in the
I. Marriage ............................................443 Philippines ................................................. 458
II. Divorce and Separation.....................445
III. Annulment and Declaration of Nullity 445
IV. Parental Relations.............................446
V. Adoption ............................................446
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER Chapter I. INTRODUCTION
Sources Custom
Treaty
general
principles of
law
recognized by
National
civilized
conflict rule
nations
International
judicial
conflict rules
decisions
teachings of
the most
highly
qualified
publicists
Remedies diplomatic
protest
resort to forum negotiation,
court or conciliation,
administrative arbitration
tribunals (as adjudication
provided by before
municipal laws international
of the state) tribunal
use of force
war
must exist among the forum, defendant, and Factors which justify the application of forum law
the cause of action. 1. A specific law of the forum decrees that
4. Long-arm statutes: statutes that allow the internal law should apply.
forum state to exercise jurisdiction over a 2. The proper foreign law was not properly
non-resident defendant, provided that the pleaded and proved.
prospective defendant has sufficient 3. The case falls under any of the exceptions
minimum contacts with the forum state. to the application of foreign law:
a. The foreign law is contrary to an
III. Ways of Dealing with Jurisdiction in a IMPORTANT PUBLIC POLICY of the
Conflicts Problem forum
b. The foreign law is PROCEDURAL in
nature
A. Dismiss the Case c. The foreign law is PENAL in nature
d. The case involves real or personal
Grounds PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE
1. For Lack of jurisdiction over the subject FORUM (Lex Situs)
matter or over the parties to the suit e. The issue involved in the enforcement of
2. On the ground of FORUM NON foreign claim is FISCAL or
CONVENIENS ADMINISTRATIVE
f. The foreign law is contrary to GOOD
Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens MORALS (contra bonus mores)
(Asked in 94, 04 BAR EXAMINATIONS) g. The application of foreign law will work
1. This literally means the forum is UNDENIABLE INJUSTICE to citizens of
inconvenient. the forum
2. This doctrine requires the court to dismiss h. The application of foreign law might
the case on the ground that the controversy endanger the VITAL INTERESTS of the
may be suitably tried elsewhere. state
The doctrine of forum non conveniens
should NOT be used as a ground for a
motion to dismiss because Sec. 1, Rule
16 of the Rules of Court does not
include said doctrine as a ground.
The propriety of dismissing a case
based on the principle of forum non
conveniens requires a factual
determination; hence it is more properly
considered as a matter of defense.
(Bank of America NT&SA v. CA, 2003) 430
3. Reasons for applying forum non conveniens:
B. Assume Jurisdiction
Criticisms:
a. Conflicts cases were ordinarily
concerned only with private and not
governmental interests.
b. ii.Not all state legislatures publish
reports that explain background and
purpose of laws, thus courts are left
to speculate.
Illustration:
B and J, NY residents, met a car
accident in Ontario thru Js fault. B sued
J in NY for damages. Ontario bars
recovery under a guest statute. NY does
not have a similar rule. B should be
allowed to recover. NY had a greater
and more direct interest than Ontario.
NYs policy is to afford compensation to
a guest tortfeasor host while Ontarios
policy is to prevent fraudulent collusion
to the prejudice of Ontario defendants
and insurance companies. Ontario had 432
no interest in denying a remedy to a NY
3. Comparative Impairment
Court weighs conflicting interests and
apply the law of the state whose interest
would be more impaired it its laws were
not followed
Chapter VI. Notice and Proof of Foreign II. Exceptions to the Application of
Law Foreign Law
I. DETERMINATION OF NATIONALITY Sec.1, Art IV. The following are citizens of the
II. PROCEDURE FOR NATURALIZATION Philippines:
III. LOSS OF PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP (1) Those who are citizens of the Philippines at the
IV. PROBLEMS IN APPLYING THE NATIONALITY time of the adoption of this Constitution;
PRINCIPLE (2) Those whose fathers or mothers are citizens of
the Philippines;
Most civil law countries such as the (3) Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino
Philippines follow the NATIONAL LAW mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon
THEORY: (Asked in 98, 04, BAR reaching the age of majority; and
EXAMINATIONS) (4) Those who are naturalized in accordance with
law.
It is the nationality or citizenship of the
individual, which regulates the following: 1. Natural-Born Citizens
Civil status DEFINITION: Those who are citizens of
Capacity the Philippines without having to perform
Condition any act to acquire or perfect citizenship.
Family rights and duties Two principles:
Laws on Succession JUS SOLI looks to the PLACE of
Capacity to succeed BIRTH to determine ones
nationality
According to the Supreme Court, it is a JUS SANGUINIS
conflict of laws theory by virtue of which - means rule of DESCENT OR
jurisdiction over the particular subject matter BLOOD
affecting a person is determined by the - Principle followed in the
latters nationality. (Ellis vs. Republic, 1963) Philippines
2. Citizens by Naturalization
In the Philippines, the nationality principle is NATURALIZATION: confers to an
expressed in Art. 15 of the Civil Code as alien a nationality after birth by any
follows: means provided by law.
In the Philippines, this is done by
Article 15, Civil Code. Laws relating to family rights judicial method under CA No. 73 as
and duties, or to status, condition and capacity of amended by RA 530.
persons are binding upon citizens of the Philippines
even though living abroad.
II. Procedure for Naturalization 436
I. Determination of Nationality
2. Statelessness
Two senses:
a. DE JURE statelessness: A person has
been stripped of his nationality by his
former government without having an
opportunity to acquire another
b. DE FACTO statelessness: A person
possessed of a nationality but whose
country does not give him protection
outside its own territory (refugees)
C. Kinds of Domicile
Chapter VIII. Domicile 1. Domicile of Origin
A persons DOMICILE AT BIRTH
I. DOMICILE
II. COMPARATIVE MERITS AND DEMERITS OF LEGITIMATE CHILD ILLEGITIMATE CHILD
DOMICILE AND NATIONALITY
Follow the FATHERs Follow the MOTHERs
domicile domicile
I. Domicile
2. Domicile of Choice
A. Municipal Law/Philippine Law Definition: i. A persons VOLUNTARY
DOMICILE
PERSON DOMICILE The place freely chosen by a
Natural persons Art. 50. For the exercise person sui juris (of full age and
of civil rights and the capacity)
fulfillment of civil ii. To acquire it, there must be a
obligations, the domicile concurrence of:
of natural persons is the
PLACE OF THEIR
ACTUAL RESIDENCE; and
HABITUAL REDENCE. ANIMO MANENDI - intent to
Juridical persons Domicile is determined make it ones home
by the LAW CREATING
OR RECOGNIZING IT. Domicile of Domicile of
DISTINCTION
In the absence Origin Choice
thereof, place where As to: Stronger As compared to
legal representation condition presumption in domicile of
or place of business necessary for favor of its origin, less
is. its continuance presumption in
abandonment favor of its
CONFLICTS of LAW DEFINITION NOT lost by continuance
(Restatement): mere
abandonment
The place with which a person has a and remains until
SETTLED CONNECTION for certain replaced by a
legal purposes, either because: domicile of
His home is there; or choice
Place is assigned to him by law As to: capacity Presumed to be Deemed
for revival revived once the extinguished by
To acquire a domicile, there must be a domicile of removal of
concurrence of TWO ELEMENTS: choice is given intent even prior
up and before a to the
i. INTENTION to make it ones
new one is acquisition of a 439
domicile; and acquired new domicile
Art. 69, Family Code. The husband and wife shall fix
the family domicile. In case of disagreement, the court
shall decide. The court may exempt one spouse from
living with the other if the latter should live abroad or
there are other valid and compelling reasons for such
exemption
2. Demerits
a. does not provide solution with respect to
stateless persons
those with multiple nationalities
states with diverse legal systems
b. persons ties to his nation may be so
attenuated if he has lived in another
country most of his life
B. Domicile
1. Merits
a. genuine linkadequate basis for him to
exercise rights therein and the state to
impose duties on him
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER Chapter IX. PRINCIPLES on PERSONAL STATUS and CAPACITY
IV. Name
A. Governing Law
Determined by PERSONAL LAW
V. Age of Majority
A. Governing LawDetermined by
PERSONAL LAW
B. Age of Majority under Philippine Law
Age of majority is 18 years old [RA 6809]
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER Chapter X. FAMILY RELATIONS
NOTE:
NOTE: These exceptions put into issue the 1. Rule on Proxy Marriages (Asked in 85-89
capacity of the parties to enter into the marriage BAR EXAMINATIONS)
and therefore relate to the substantive a. proxy marriages, where permitted by the
requirement for marriage. Since the personal law law of the place where the proxy
of the parties, e.g. the national law of Filipinos, participates in the marriage ceremony,
governs the questions of intrinsic validity of are entitled to recognition in countries
marriages between Filipinos abroad, the above adhering to the lex loci celebrationis
enumerations are exceptions to lex loci rule, at least insofar as formal validity is
celebrationis precisely because they are concerned
controlled by lex nationalii b. internal Philippine law, however, does
not sanction proxy marriages.
B. Domestic Adoption Act of 1998 NOTE: Adoption is one of the ways prescribed 446
1. An alien may adopt, provided he is: by law for the acquisition of Filipino citizenship
Will is revoked in
815, CC]
the Philippines
Philippine
2. Philippine law [see III Domiciliary
Tolentino 117]
Philippine Law
A. Controlling Law
NOTE: Rule re: Joint Wills The probate of a will being essentially
1. Joint wills prohibited under Art. 818, CC procedural in character, the law of the
executed by Filipinos in a foreign country forum (lex fori) governs.
shall not be valid in the Philippines even
though authorized by the laws of the country B. Wills Proved and Allowed in a Foreign
where they were executed. [Art. 819, CC] Country
(Asked in 00-04 BAR EXAMINATIONS) 1. A will proved and allowed in a foreign
2. Civil Code is silent as to the validity of a joint country in accordance with the laws of that
will executed by an alien in the Philippines. It country may be allowed, filed, and recorded
is suggested that that it should not be in the proper Regional Trial Court in the
probated if it would affect the heirs in the Philippines [RULES OF COURT, Rule 77,
Philippines. Sec.1]
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER Chapter XIII. SUCCESSION
VII. Trusts
Extrinsic Validity: rules governing wills apply
Intrinsic Validity: lex situs since a trust
involves property
452
II. Crimes
A. General Rule
Lex Loci Delicti Commissi/ Locus Regit
Actum (law of the place where the act was
committed)
B. Exceptions
1. Crimes committed by state officials,
diplomatic representatives and officials of
recognized international organizations
(based on the doctrine of state immunity
from suit.
2. Crimes committed on board a foreign vessel
even if it is within the territorial waters of the
coastal state, as long as the effect of such
crime does not affect the peace and order of
the coastal state.
3. Crimes which, although committed by
Philippine nationals abroad are punishable
under Philippine law as provided in Art. 2,
Revised Penal Code:
b. offenses committed in a Philippine 454
vessel or airship
Chapter XV. Torts and Crimes B. Rule if the Same Not Fixed by Law
If the law does not fix the same, the domicile of
I. Personal Law of Corporations juridical persons shall be understood to be [Art.
A. General Law: Law of Incorporation 51, CC]:
B. Exceptions 1. place where their legal representation is
1. Constitutional and Statutory
established; or
Restrictions
2. Control Test During War 2. place where they exercise their principal
II. Domicile/Residence of Corporations functions
A. General Rule
B. Exceptions NOTE: A foreign corporation granted license to
III. Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations operate in the Philippines acquires domicile
A. Consent Doctrine here.
B. Foreign Corporations Doing Business
Bound by Philippine Law
1. Art. 129, Corporation Code
2. Service Upon Foreign Corporations III. Jurisdiction Over Foreign
Doing Business in the Philippines Corporations
IV. Right of Foreign Corporations to Bring Suit
A. General Rule
A. Consent Doctrine
B. Exceptions
1. Isolated Transactions A foreign corporation shall be recognized
2. Action to Protect Trademark, Trade and will be allowed to transact business in
Name, Goodwill, Patent or for Unfair any state which gives it consent. The
Competition consent doctrine is established in Sections
3. Agreements Fully Transacted 125, 126, 127 and 128 of the Corporation
Outside the Philippines Code.
4. Petitions Filed Merely as Corollary .
Defense in a Suit Against It B. Foreign Corporations Doing Business in
Philippines Bound by Philippine Law
1. Under Art. 129 of the Corporation Code, all
foreign corporations lawfully doing business
I. Personal Law of Corporations in the Philippines shall be bound by all laws,
rules, and regulations applicable to domestic
A. General Rule corporations; EXCEPT:
Law of the State where it is incorporated a. provisions for the creation, formation,
[Art. 2, Corporation Code] organization or dissolution of
corporations
b. those which fix the relations, liabilities, 455
NOTE: Hence, if the law creating the corporation
responsibilities, or duties of
A. General Rule
License to transact business in the
Philippines is an essential prerequisite for
filing a suit before Philippine courts [Art. 133,
Corporation Code]
B. Exceptions
1. isolated transactions
2. action to protect trademark, trade name,
goodwill, patent or for unfair competition
3. agreements fully transacted outside the
Philippines
4. when the petition filed is merely a corollary
defense in a suit against the corporation
456
B. Summary Proceeding
1. Followed in most civil law countries
2. A summary proceeding for enforcement is
provided by statute.
C. Judgment Registration
An authenticated copy of the foreign
judgment is filed in the registrars office
together with other proofs required by
domestic laws and the foreign judgment is
converted into a local one that is
immediately executory.