Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Robert P. Sanders, MD
Robert P. Sanders, MD Hematology/Oncology
St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital
Case Presentation
1
Questions Diagnosis: Did This Patient
Did this patient have a thrombotic Have a Thrombotic Event?
event? Clinical features
Why did this patient develop Sites
thrombosis? Symptoms
What is the risk of recurrence?
Diagnostic Imaging
Is prophylactic anticoagulation
indicated? Ultrasound
Venography
For how long?
CT
What anticoagulation regimen would
be optimal? MR Venography
Pathophysiology
Thrombosis? cell
cell
cell
2
Pathophysiology Epidemiology
VTE very uncommon in children
Balance of pro-thrombotic and
Incidence 0.07 0.14 per 10,000 children
anticoagulant / fibrinolytic factors
<18 yo
Populations at increased risk:
Turbulence/stasis of blood flow
Neonates
2.4 per 1000 NICU admissions
Foreign bodies Central lines
3.5 per 10,000 hospital admissions
CVL-
CVL-Related CVL-
CVL-Related
Thrombosis in Hemophilia Thrombosis in Cancer
Journeycake,
Journeycake, et al. Blood 2001
Glaser, et al. J Pediatr 2001
15 boys with severe hemophilia, CVL present 31 ports removed from 24 cancer pts
>12 months
50% had DVT
8 had DVT by venogram
5 had clinical problems
Mitchell, et al. Cancer 2003
Mean duration of placement 57.5 months
60 children with all screened by ultrasound
No abnormal venogram with line in place <48
months 22 (36.7%) had TE
3
CVL-
CVL-Related Thrombosis
in Cystic Fibrosis Why Did This Patient Develop
Aitken,
Aitken, et al. Chest 2000.
Thrombosis?
218 Adult CF patients 1989-1998
65 had CVL (30%) Answer 1: Central line
75,660 catheter-days Answer 2: ?
14 thromboses (0.185/1000 catheter-days)
2 SVC syndrome (0.026/1000 catheter-days)
cell
Chalmers EA, Blood Rev 2001
4
Prothrombin 20210 Mutation Possible Common Risk Factors
5
What is the Risk of Recurrent VTE? What is the Risk of Recurrent VTE?
German Study
301 patients age neonate to 18 yo with VTE
Median follow-up 7 years after stopping anticoagulation
Recurrent VTE in 21.3% at median 3.5 yrs off
anticoagulation
Significantly shorter thrombosis-free survival in children
with combined pro-thrombotic defects
RR 2.6 in pts with elevated Lp(a) (95%CI, 0.7-9.9)
Warfarin
6
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Administration of LMW Heparin
Subcutaneous administration
Greater bioavailability than UF heparin
Dose 1-2 mg/kg/dose SC Q12
More specific mechanism of action
Lower risk of bleeding
Target anti-Xa level 0.2-0.4 units/ml
Very expensive
Inexpensive
Bern, et al. Ann Int Med 1990
7
What Did We Do?
Figure 2. Cumulative Risk of the Primary Study End Point of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
(Panel A) and of the Composite Study End Point of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism, Major
Hemorrhage, or Death from Any Cause (Panel B).
Conclusions
?
Venous thromboembolic events are uncommon
in children
Much more is known about risk factors than
? ?
8
? !
End
Robert P. Sanders, MD
You may print and download content for personal educational use only.
All material is copyrighted by the author of the content
or St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital.
See legal terms and conditions at http://www.Cure4Kids.org