Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Depending on the
onditions of freezing, under
ooled eren
e liquid, the length s
ale, n = ( ref L )/L
ref
liquids may solidify to dierent
rystal stru
tures [1. the redu
ed number density, BL = (L ref L kB T )
1
, and
The sele
tion of the
rystal stru
ture is inuen
ed by var- ref
BS = K(L kB T ) . Here L is the
ompressibility
1
ious properties of the available
rystalline phases in
lud- of the liquid, K the bulk modulus of the
rystal, while
ing the thermodynami
driving for
e of freezing, and the v = 1 emerges from Taylor expanding the ideal gas term.
kineti
oe
ient that des
ribes the atta
hment of atoms Adjusting v , one may in
orporate the 0th order
ontri-
to the surfa
e of the
rystal [1. An interesting question bution from three-body
orrelations. This form of F
an
that
an only be answered using an atomisti
approa
h be dedu
ed from the Ramakrishnan-Yussou type per-
is, how the growth rates of stable and metastable
rys- turbative DFT [3 after some simpli
ations [5, su
h as
talline polymorphs forming in the same liquid do
om- Taylor expanding the two-parti
le dire
t
orrelation fun
-
pare. Mole
ular dynami
s (MD) simulations have been tion in Fourier spa
e up to 4th order. The resulting ee
-
used widely to evaluate the growth anisotropy of the tive two-parti
le dire
t
orrelation fun
tion shows a single
solid-liquid interfa
e [2. However, in su
h simulations maximum, so the respe
tive free energy prefers a given
the diusion-
ontrolled regime
annot be easily a
essed, interparti
le distan
e. This approa
h retains the ri
h-
and the realization of a multipli
ity of metastable and ness of the original DFT, and predi
ts
rystal stru
ture,
stable phases is not without di
ulties. Other promis- anisotropy, and elasti
properties. This model is known
ing
andidates are the mole
ular theories of freezing that to
rystallize to the b
stru
ture [5. We note, however,
rely on the density fun
tional te
hnique (DFT). In the that any periodi
stru
ture that honors this distan
e shall
past de
ades a variety of DFTs have been developed [3. be a lo
al minimum of the free energy. Assigning free en-
However, simulation of
rystal growth has be
ame reality ergy to periodi
stru
tures su
h as b
, h
p, f
, and s
,
only re
ently, within a dynami
al extension of the DFT the PFC model is expe
ted to predi
t phase preferen
e.
(DDFT) [4. These studies are restri
ted to a few hun- Sin
e the number density is a
onserved quantity, the
dred atoms. Starting from a simplied free energy fun
- time evolution of the system obeys
onserved dynami
s,
tional, a newly emerging DDFT-type approa
h, known as
the phase-eld
rystal (PFC) method [5, appears to be
n F
able to address
rystalline freezing on a far larger s
ale. = Mn , (2)
t n
In this Letter, we use the PFC method to
ompare
the growth of several
rystalline polymorphs in the same where a
onstant mobility of the form Mn = [(1 +
under
ooled liquid. The redu
ed free energy is as follows. n0 )D /(kB T ref
L )] sets the time s
ale for system evo-
lution, while n0 is the redu
ed number density of the
vn3 n4
n
Z
F = dr 2 4
BL + BS (2 + ) n
+ , initial supersaturated liquid, D the self-diusion
oe-
2 6 12
ient, and F /n is the rst fun
tional derivative of the
(1) free energy with respe
t to the eld n. An advantage of
where F = (F FLref )/(ref L 3
kB T ), FL
ref
and ref
L the PFC method is that it is able to address pro
esses on
are the free energy and the number density of the ref- the diusive time s
ale, whi
h is by orders of magnitude
2
/ BCC
x 104
-3 0.8
-4 address
rystallization, that the anisotropy of the surfa
e
0.6 energy, and also anisotropy of kineti
origin is impli
itly
-5
-6 BCC 0.4 in
luded in the model. First, to gain information on the
-7 FCC FCC
anisotropy of the solid-liquid interfa
ial free energy , we
HCP (a) 0.2 HCP (b)
-8 SC SC determined the stable and metastable equilibrium shapes
-9 0
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 (that minimize for a given
luster volume the
ontribu-
n0 x 102 n0 x 102 tion from and ree
ts its anisotropy). Quasi equilib-
rium state was a
hieved via growing from initial grains
FIG. 1: (Color online). (a) Driving for
e of
rystallization, of the respe
tive
rystal stru
ture. Strongly fa
eted do-
, and (b) /bcc vs the redu
ed initial number density,
n0 , for the b
, h
p, f
, and s
stru
tures. de
ahedral, o
tahedral and hexagonal-prism shapes were
observed for the b
, f
, and h
p stru
tures. This per-
fe
t fa
eting, (often seen in
olloids [11) a result of a thin
( 1-2 mole
ular layers) interfa
e prevented us to evalu-
longer than the time a
essible for other atomisti
simu- ate the anisotropy for the f
and b
phases, sin
e their
lations, su
h as mole
ular dynami
s [5. Su
h diusion- equilibrium shape were bounded ex
lusively by {110},
ontrolled relaxation dynami
s is relevant for
olloidal and {111} fa
es. For h
p stru
ture the bounding {1010}
systems and for deeply under
ooled liquids, where the and {0001} fa
es give 1010 /0001 = 1.08 0.01.
self-diusion of the parti
les is expe
ted to be the domi- Anisotropies of kineti
origin were determined in pla-
nant way of density relaxation. For mole
ular liquids at nar growth s
enarios using domain length Lz = 1024
small under
oolings, the hydrodynami
mode of density in dimensionless unit (ee
tive length of 512 be
ause of
relaxation dominates. A
ordingly, the present
ompu- the periodi
boundary
onditions required by the spe
tral
tations will be indi
ative to the behavior of
olloidal sys- numeri
al s
heme). We investigated the most important
tems. Indeed su
h systems are known to
rystallize to low index fa
es, the {100}, {110} and {111} of the b
stru
tures investigated here [6. and f
, and the {0001}, {1010}, and {1120} of the h
p
Eq. (2) has been solved numeri
ally using a semi- stru
ture. When tra
king the interfa
e, after a brief tran-
impli
it Fourier spe
tral method [7 using x = 1 and sient, the front position z displays a roughly z t1/2
= 1 dimensionless steps for spa
e and time dis
retiza- behavior [Fig. 2(e), indi
ating a diusion-
ontrolled
tion. As initial
ondition at, n0 = 0.04 number density growth me
hanism, often observed in
olloidal systems
was used in the liquid domain (unless stated otherwise), [12. We have tted z = z0 + C(t t0 )1/2 paraboli
fun
-
and an analyti
al approximation of the stable, bulk
rys- tion to positiontime data, where nite size ee
t was not
tal phases [8 in the
rystalline domains. dete
table. Here z0 is the initial position, C is the velo
-
Model parameters were set to BS = 31/2 /2, B = ity
oe
ient, and t0 is the transient time. Analogously
BL BS = 5 105 , and v = 31/4 /2, aiming the to the linear kineti
oe
ient [2, the velo
ity
oef-
phase
oexisten
e regions are su
iently
lose to ea
h
ient C dened as above is a measure of the interfa
e
other to be able to make meaningful
omparison of atta
hment kineti
s, and its dependen
e on the
rystallo-
the dynami
s of ordering to b
, f
and h
p latti
e. graphi
orientation des
ribes the kineti
anisotropy. The
The
oexisten
e regions were
al
ulated between the liq- velo
ity
oe
ients at n0 = 0.04 are summarized in Ta-
uid and the
rystalline phases (b
, h
p, f
, and s
) ble I, data for f
{111} fa
e is missing, the rst layer on
via numeri
al minimization of the free energy with re- our initial
rystal was a sta
king fault and
ontinued as
spe
t to the density distribution. For the spe
ied a h
p stru
ture. In our investigation all interfa
es were
model
onstants,
ommon tangent
onstru
tion yielded ideal
rystal fa
es, the near to
lose-pa
ked hexagonal
the following
rystal-liquid
oexisten
e regions: b
- planes grow far slower than the ones are more
orrugated
liquid: 0.0862 < n0 < 0.0315, h
p-liquid: 0.0865 < on the atomisti
s
ale. Note, that in our model system,
n0 < 0.0344, f
-liquid: 0.0862 < n0 < 0.0347, the C values for dierent stru
tures
an be dire
tly
om-
and s
-liquid: 0.0249 < n0 < 0.0216. For the shake pared, as they
orrespond to essentially the same driving
of
ompleteness we also
al
ulated the thermodynami
s for
e. We also nd that C in
reases monotoni
ally with
for the s
latti
e, although we were not able to a
hieve n0 [Fig. 2(f), while the ratio of C values for dierent
metastable s
ordering in our simulations. The driving orientations varies with n0 .
for
e for
rystalline aggregation (the grand potential den- In
omparison to experiments, availability of rele-
sity dieren
e relative to the initial liquid [9) is presented vant growth data is very limited. The velo
ity ratio
in Fig. 1(a). It must be noted that not just the
oexis- v100 /v110 2.3 for fa
eted 3 He
rystals (b
) [13, is
lose
ten
e regions are very similar for the b
f
, and h
p- to the present 1.7 2.7, although in the experiment
liquid phases, but also the driving for
e dieren
e relative growth was not diusion
ontrolled. The experimental
3
n x 102
0.4 -4
simulations for these stru
tures: A relatively small ki-
n
0.2 -5
neti
anisotropy has been indi
ated for the b
stru
- 0
-6
ture, and the sequen
e of the growth velo
ities vary with -0.2 (a) (b)
-7
the applied potential [2, although usually 100 > 110 -0.4
-8
as here. The MD sequen
e for the h
p stru
ture (Mg) 120 140 160 180 200 0 100 200 300 400
[2 agrees with the PFC result, however, the anisotropy z z
is smaller. Simulations for the f
stru
ture (Lennard- -7.1 1
Jones, Ni, Ag, Au, Cu, and Fe) [2 indi
ate that the 0.8
-7.2
fastest and lowest growth rates apply for the {100}
n~min x 102
0.6
and {111} orientations. The ratio 100 /110 varies in
nmax
-7.3 0.4
the range of 1.4 1.8, as opposed to the PFC result
C100 /C110 = 0.97. These dieren
es are attributable 0.2
-7.4
to the fa
ts that the MD simulations refer to materials (c) 0 (d)
of low melting entropy (Sf kB ), whose
rystal-liquid
-7.5 -0.2
interfa
e extends to 4 5 atomi
layers, whereas with 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
the present model parameters the PFC realizes a sharp x 10-3 x 10-3
1.4
fa
eted interfa
e.
1.8
160 SIT33 proje
t. A.J. a
knowledges nan
ial support from
FCC BCC FCC BCC
1.6
140 the Finnish A
ademy of S
ien
e and Letters. T.P. is a
1.4
120 grantee of the Bolyai Jnos S
holarship.
1.2
1 100
c/a
v-
0.8 80
0.6 60
0.4 40
0.2 (a) 20 (b) [1 D. M. Herla
h, D. Holland-Moritz, and P. Galenko,
0 0 Metastable Solids from Under
ooled Melts. (Elsevier, Am-
8 8.4
a0
8.8 9.2 8 8.4
a0
8.8 9.2 sterdam, 2007).
[2 H. E. A. Huitema, B. van Hengstun, and J. P. van der
Eerden, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10248 (1999); J. J. Hoyt
FIG. 3: (Color online). Heteroepitaxy in the PFC: Axial ratio and M. Asta, Phys. Rev. B 65, 214106 (2002); D. Y.
c/a of the b
t stru
ture (solid line), and the average growth Sun, M. Asta, and J. J. Hoyt, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174103,
rate (dashed lines) vs. the latti
e
onstant a0 of the substrate. 024108 (2004); Z. G. Xia, D. Y. Sun, M. Asta, and J. J.
Hoyt, Phys. Rev. B 75, 012103 (2007).
[3 T. V. Ramakrishnan and M. Yussou, Phys. Rev. B 19,
The stru
ture of the
rystals that grew in our simu- 2775 (1979); W. A. Curtin and N. W. Ash
roft, Phys.
lations on the {100} fa
e of the s
substrate, is body- Rev. A 32, 2909 (1985); J. F. Lutsko and G. Ni
olis,
entered tetragonal (b
t). The axial ratio c/a varies
on- Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 046102 (2006).
tinuously with a0 [Fig. 3(a), where c and a are the latti
e [4 S. van Teeelen, C. N. Likos, and H. Lwen. Phys. Rev.
onstants of the b
t stru
ture perpendi
ular and paral- Lett. 100, 108302 (2008).
[5 K. R. Elder, M. Katakowski, M. Haataja, and M. Grant,
lel to the surfa
e of the substrate, respe
tively. At the Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 245701 (2002); K. R. Elder and M.
appropriate a0 values, we observe the f
and b
stru
- Grant, Phys. Rev. E 70, 051605 (2004); K. R. Elder et
tures. These ndings suggest that phase sele
tion
an al., Phys. Rev. B 75, 064107 (207); J. Berry, K. R. Elder,
be
ontrolled via the stru
ture of the substrate. Indeed, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. E 77, 061506 (2008).
ele
trophoreti
deposition of
harged polymer
olloids on [6 U. Gasser, E. R. Weeks, A. S
hoeld, P. N. Pusey, and D.
at substrates with appropriate square-patterned holes A. Weitz, S
ien
e 292, 258 (2001); V. J. Anderson and
produ
es both the f
and the b
stru
tures [15. N. W. Lekkerkerker, Nature 416, 811 (2002); A. Yethiraj
and A. van Blaaderen, Nature 421, 513 (2003).
The average growth rate interpolates roughly linearly [7 G. Tegze et al., J. Comput. Phys. 228, 1612 (2009).
between the values for the f
and b
stru
tures [Fig. [8 In the single-mode approximation, the redu
ed number
3(a). While on the f
side a planar growth front is densities for the
rystals are: b
: see K. A. Wu and
seen, for a0 > 8.6 a rough surfa
e
omposed of four- A. Karma, Phys. Rev. B 76, 184107 (2007), f
: n =
sided pyramids bound by {110} fa
ets evolves probably 8A{cos(qx) cos(qy) cos(qz)}, and s
: n = 2A{cos(qx) +
as a result of
oupled Mullins-Sekerka and Asaro-Tiller- cos(qy) + cos(qz)}. As the single-mode approximation
Grinfeld (MS/ATG) type instabilities, expe
ted in the does not work for h
p, we have used
a simple ansatz:
n =A{cos(2qy/ 3) + cos(qx
qy/ 3) cos(2/3
qx +
stress eld the substrate generates in heteroepitaxy [16. qy/ 3) + cos(qx +qy/ 3) cos(4/3 + qx + qy/ 3)
The instability is ree
ted in the spatial variation of the cos(2/3 + 2qy/ 3)} cos[( 3/ 8)qz]. Here q = 2/a.
average growth rate. The enhan
ed sensitivity to the The latti
e
onstant a and the amplitude A have been
instability on the b
side is attributable to the lower determined by analyti
minimization of the free energy.
interfa
ial free energy relative to the f
side [2. It is ev- [9 X = fX (nX ) fL /n(n0 )[nX n0 ] fL (n0 ), where
ident that the substrate plays a role (provides the stress), nX is the
rystal density maximizing the driving for
e.
as in ist absen
e planar growth is observed. As expe
ted [10 E. B. Sirota et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1524 (1989).
[11 G. Y. Onoda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 226 (1985); A. T.
for a MS/ATG type instability, it
an be suppressed be- Skjeltorp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1444 (1987); D. V. Ta-
yond a lower and a higher
riti
al velo
ity [16. In the lapin et al., Adv. Mater. 17, 1325 (2005); J. D. Wood-
ase of a0 = 8.83), these limits fall to n0 0.05 and ward et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 19456 (2006).
n0 0.02. We also nd that with in
reasing
ross- [12 A. P. Gast and Y. Monovoukas, Nature 351, 553 (1991);
se
tional area the roughness of the interfa
e in
reases. K. S
htzel and B. J. A
kerson, Phys. Rev. E 48, 3766
Work is underway to quantify these phenomena further. (1993); W. B. Russel et al., Langmuir 13, 3871 (1997);
This work has been supported by the EU FP7 Col- S. Derber et al., Physi
a A 235, 204 (1997).
[13 V. Tsepelin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 045302 (2002).
laborative Proje
t ENSEMBLE under Grant Agreement [14 V. S. Harutyunyan et al., J. Mater. S
i. 44, 962 (2009).
NMP4-SL-2008-213669 and by the Hungarian A
ademy [15 N. V. Dziomkina, M. A. Hempenius, and J. G. Van
so,
of S
ien
es under
ontra
t OTKA-K-62588. T.A-N. and Adv. Mater. 17, 237 (2005).
A.J. have been supported by the A
ademy of Finland [16 I. Durand et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3013 (1996).
via its COMP CoE grant, and by Tekes via its MA-