Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright 2017
Paul H. Brewbaker, Ph.D., CBE
A conversation about sustainable tourism is impossible
without the correct data
1. Applying the adjective sustainable to tourism is phony if the term sustainable is a euphemism
for the adjective less: if you want less tourism, say so
2. Lots of people want less tourism: xenophobes, ethnitocracists, economic nationalists and other
anti-immigrants, from Barcelona to Iceland to Hawaii; if youre one of them, own it
3. Long before it was fashionable to attach the adjective sustainable to tourism and everything else,
economists wrestled with problems of resource stewardship and economic growth,* but over time
the popular concept increasingly has satisfied Robert Solows maxim about sustainability, that
the less you know about it, the better it sounds.
4. Sustainable tourism has been studied extensively in Hawaii, quantifying its dimensions (feast on
http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/visitor/sustainable-tourism-project/reports/)asked and answered
5. Also well-studied, if worthy of further work, much of it from the University of Hawaii: natural
resource valuations in Hawaii and why stewardship matters
*See, for example, Harold J. Barnett and Chandler Morse (1963), Scarcity and Growth, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press; Edward Denison (1962), The
Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us, New York, Committee for Economic Development; and William D. Nordhaus and
James Tobin (1972), Is Growth Obsolete? in NBER Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect vol. 5, National Bureau of Economic Research
(http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7620.pdf)
Robert M. Solow (1991) Sustainability: An Economists Perspective presented as the Eighteenth J. Seward Johnson Lecture to the Marine Policy Center, Woods
Hole Oceanographic Institution, at Woods Hole, Massachusetts, reprinted in Robert N. Stavins, ed., Economic of the Environment, 5th ed. New York, W.W. Norton.
Brooks Kaiser and James Roumasset (2002), Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds, Environment and Development Economics Slide copyright 2017
vol. 7 no. 4 pp. 701-714, Cambridge University Press (working paper at http://uhero.hawaii.edu/assets/EDE.pdf) and a zillion other papers. 1
A conversation about sustainable tourism is impossible
without the correct data
Tourism
16.9%
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Hawaii DBEDT (State of Hawaii Data Book Table 7.34), Hawaii Agricultural Statistics Services, National Slide copyright 2017
Agricultural Statistics Service 4
Back to the future: Hawaii GDP and major exportable sector shares
Agriculture
Agriculture Agriculture
5.6%
0.9% 0.8%
Tourism
Tourism
7.3%
Tourism 17.4%
Military 26.3%
13.2%
Military
7.5%
Other Other
66.5% Other
73.9%
Military 74.3%
6.2%
Sources: BEA (http://bea.gov/regional/index.htm); 2013 tourism estimates uses approximation to James Mak, 2005, Tourism demand and output in the U.S. Tourism Satellite Accounts: 1998-2003, Journal Slide copyright 2017
of Travel Research, 44 (1), pp. 4-5, and Eugene Tian, James Mak, and PingSun Leung, The direct and indirect contributions of tourism to regional GDP: Hawaii, UHERO Working Paper No.
2011-5 (July 28, 2011) (http://www.uhero.hawaii.edu/assets/WP_2011-5.pdf); DBEDT World Travel and Tourism Council report (http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/visitor-stats/econ-impact/WTTC99.pdf) 5
Hawaii gross product by industry (bubble size) 2009-2016: tourism an
initial 20-teens recovery engine; restructuring (outsourcing) a new theme
Growth%
Administrative and waste management Management of companies and enterprises 6
Accommodation
Retail Food services Arts, entertainment 4
Transportation and recreation
Health
Wholesale
Real estate Finance and insurance
2
State and local govt. Manufacturing
Oth. Information
Federal civilian
Military Construction and mining
0
Utilities
Professional, scientific, and technical services
Legal services
Agriculture
-2
Private education
Off the chart:
(negatively)
Motion picture and
sound recording
industries
0 5 10 Volatility () %
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce (http://www.bea.gov/regional/gsp/); calculations by author, annualized (compound annual) real growth rates and Slide copyright 2017
standard deviations of log changes of real GDP in chained 2009 dollars, by industry (hidden behind real estate: computer systems design and related services) 6
Monetary policy divergence, exchange rates, and tourism
2013 2014
200 c. 25%
280
after 280
inflation 2016
2013
175 2012
125 200
200
100
70 75 80 85 90% 60 60
80 80
100 100
120 120
140 140
Sources: Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT, Bureau of Labor Statistics; seasonal adjustment, deflation using Honolulu CPI-U (quarterly interpolation from semiannual data and Slide copyright 2017
annual averages, as appropriate) by TZE 8
Diverging policy: Japanese yen and Euro depreciated while U.S.
Federal Reserve was moving towards monetary policy normalization
1.4 140
Yen/dollar Value of
dollar in yen
(right scale)
1.2 120
113.475 /$
1.0 100
Value of Euro/dollar
dollar in (left scale) BoJ* [$1.1377/]1
Euro
0.8 80
ECB
0.6 60
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
* Prime Minister Abe re-elected December 16, 2012, initiates Abenomics, endorsing Quantitative Easing (expanded asset purchases by Bank of Japan).
Quantitative Easing by the European Central Bank widely anticipated in financial markets; announced by ECB President Draghi January 22, 2015.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; data through July 2017 (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXUSEU and http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXJPUS); Slide copyright 2017
exchange rates noted are U.S. market closing prices 9
Falling oil prices crashed the Loonie: higher oil prices led to substitution,
technology change, fracking (Canada, Dakotas) and, by 2014, an oil glut
160 1.1
Value of CAN$ (in US$)
(right scale)
120 1.0
100
80 0.9
60 Crude petroleum
price (US$) 0.8
Lehman (left scale)
Brothers
40
0.7
20 0.6
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: CD Howe Institute (https://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Commentary_366.pdf), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; data through July 2017 (monthly averages of daily data) Slide copyright 2017
(http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXCAUS and http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MCOILWTICO/) 10
20-teens leap in Oahu hotel room rates reduced average stay length
by 0.4 days since 2010 (9 million persons) reversing 20 years rise
Average length of stay in days
8 International
U.S. recessions shaded gray 7.7
7.0 7.7
7
6.3
6
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Slide copyright 2017
Sources: Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT, monthly estimates reverse engineered from visitor days and visitor arrivals by TZE
11
Real expenditure per visitor (s.a.) in thousand constant 2015$
recovered by 2012 but had been eroding until 2016-17
2.0
1.9
$1,897
1.8
$1,733
1.7
9/11 No Aloha, ATA
1.6
1.5
02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18
Sources: Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT, Bureau of Labor Statistics; seasonal adjustment, deflation using core U.S. CPI-U by TZ Economics (excludes the impact of more Slide copyright 2017
volatile food and energy sources of consumer price inflation) through November 2016 12
Visitor arrivals have recovered statewide; capacity-constrained Oahu
boosted room rate, reduced stay length, more currency vulnerability
Thou. persons Arrivals Mil. 2016$ Thou. persons Arrivals Mil. 2016$
(right scale) (right scale)
750 475 750 475
No Aloha
700 450 700 450
650 425 650 425
600 400 600 400
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Sources: monthly data from Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT (http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/economic/mei/), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Slide copyright 2017
(https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPILFESL); seasonal adjustment and deflation by TZE; monthly expenditures not published prior to 2001 13
Real visitor expenditure, 2012-2015, just exceeded levels around peak
of last cycle, felt drag of strong dollar before re-igniting in 2016
1,500 800
Total visitor arrivals
(Thousands, right scale)
1,400 750
No Aloha
1,300 700
U.S. recession shaded
1,200 650
1,100 600
Real tourism receipts
(Million 2016$, left scale)
1,000 Tohoku 550
900 500
H1N1-A
800 450
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Sources: monthly data from Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT (http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/economic/mei/), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Slide copyright 2017
(https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPILFESL); seasonal adjustment and deflation by TZE; monthly expenditures not published prior to 2001 14
In the long-run were dead, but tourism still hasnt grown since the 1980s
0.010
Luxury Discovery Adolescence Maturity
0.001
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1974-90
(D) 1990-2016
(C)
20.5%
1.00 1946-74 Compound annual growth,
unconditional volatility (%)
(B)
(A) 4.4% growth,
22.0% volatility
0.10 4.4%
1927-41 (B) 20.5% gr., 11.7% vol.
(A)
(C) 5.6% gr., 4.5% vol.
Source: Annual data Hawaii Visitors Bureau, Hawaii DBEDT; calculations by TZ Economics; *annualized growth rate 1990-2007 before the 2008-09 recession was +0.6 percent, Slide copyright 2017
volatility was 4.4 percent 17
Down Is The New Up: 2016 real Hawaii tourism receipts same as 2005
and 2000; $3 billion lower than 1989 all-time high (in 2016 dollars)
Billion 2016 dollars Million tourists
Real visitor expenditure
$18.4 billion (left scale) 8.9
$17.5
U.S. recessions shaded
8
16 $15.6 $15.6 $15.6 billion
Doubled
6.7
in 1980s
$14.0 6
$13.2
12
Visitor arrivals $11.3
(right scale)
3.9
4
$9.2
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Sources: Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT (http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/visitor/tourism/), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; deflated using Honolulu CPI-U, rebasing to 2016, to Slide copyright 2017
express tourism export receipts in terms of purchasing power of Honolulu residents over time, by TZ Economics 18
Hawaii real tourism receipts per visitor have declined on trend, but
last quarter century corresponds with tightening lodging inventory
Thousand 2016 dollars per Hawaii visitor
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
$1,746/visitor
($1,763 by air)
Neighbor Isles
40
Oahu
Oahu
30
20 Neighbor Isles
10
0
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Slide copyright 2017
Sources: Hawaii DBEDT, annual visitor plant inventory surveys (1997 is average of 1996 and 1998); seasonal adjustment by TZ Economics
20
End of last major capital formation wave in Hawaii lodging units
around 1990 coincides with decrease in real total visitor expenditure
Billion 2016$ $18.4 billion Thousand units
16 $15.6b 80
Real visitor expenditure
(left scale)
12 60
8 40
0 0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
640 U.S.
(right scale) 800
Japan
(left scale)
320
400
Other foreign
160 (left scale)
200
80 Asian
Gulf War Financial 9/11 No Aloha
Crisis
40
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
1. Long-term (80+ years) Hawaii tourism performance consistent with Tourism Destination Life-
Cycle Hypothesis (perhaps because there is no space left on the Big Island; Thou Shalt Not
Build A Building Taller Than Walter Dodds; Thou Shalt Not Build More Lodging Units; AirBnB
is ruining my neighborhood, but enjoy my Undocumented Vacation Rental, etc.)
2. So-called capacity constraints provide self-justifying intellectual framework for explaining why
growth of Hawaiis principle export is opposed by anti-tourism denialistspopulist sustainable
tourism agenda in political coalition blending self-sufficiency advocacy (autarky: the economic
development strategy of North Korea), NIMBYism, global lodging brand protectionism
3. Problem with outcome: real tourism export receipts in 2016 were $3 billion lower than in 1989 (in
2016 dollars), same in 2016 as in 2000 (in dog years): lower yield, same volatility portfolio
4. Bumper sticker version: MORE VISITORS, NOT MORE DOLLARS (wait, what?)
5. Annual real outlays per tourist mostly have been falling since the 1950sjust like real outlays on
food, clothing, computers, side-curtain airbags, cell phones, everything (i.e. productivity
growth)everything except tourisms negative externalities, which policy-makers ignore (DOH!)