The document outlines 5 principal features that contributed to the dissolution of functional tonality in music: 1) Increased chromaticism weakened the diatonic basis and security of keys and harmonic goals. 2) Increased dissonance weakened the consonance-dissonance distinction crucial to harmony. 3) Increased use of distant harmonic relationships blurred distinctions between closely and distantly related tonal areas. 4) Use of modal alterations and nondiatonic scales weakened clarity of harmonic and melodic goals. 5) Avoidance of basic functional harmonic progressions since they sounded too old-fashioned in the new harmonic environment.
The document outlines 5 principal features that contributed to the dissolution of functional tonality in music: 1) Increased chromaticism weakened the diatonic basis and security of keys and harmonic goals. 2) Increased dissonance weakened the consonance-dissonance distinction crucial to harmony. 3) Increased use of distant harmonic relationships blurred distinctions between closely and distantly related tonal areas. 4) Use of modal alterations and nondiatonic scales weakened clarity of harmonic and melodic goals. 5) Avoidance of basic functional harmonic progressions since they sounded too old-fashioned in the new harmonic environment.
The document outlines 5 principal features that contributed to the dissolution of functional tonality in music: 1) Increased chromaticism weakened the diatonic basis and security of keys and harmonic goals. 2) Increased dissonance weakened the consonance-dissonance distinction crucial to harmony. 3) Increased use of distant harmonic relationships blurred distinctions between closely and distantly related tonal areas. 4) Use of modal alterations and nondiatonic scales weakened clarity of harmonic and melodic goals. 5) Avoidance of basic functional harmonic progressions since they sounded too old-fashioned in the new harmonic environment.
1. The increasing use of chromaticism, which weakens the diatonic basis of functional tonality, the secure status of the key, and the secure status of goals within a key.
2. The increasing use of dissonance in the form of nonharmonic tones, dissonant chords, and altered chords, which weakens the consonance-dissonance distinction crucial to harmonic stability and resolution.
3. The increasing use of distant harmonic relationships between consecutive chords and key areas, which weakens the distinction between closely related and distantly related tonal areas, and blurs the status of harmonic goals.
4. The use of modal alterations and nondiatonic scales, often for exotic effects, which also weakens the clarity of harmonic and melodic goals.
5. The avoidance of direct statements of the basic functional harmonic progressions and voice leadings, since in this new harmonic and tonal environment, simple progressions sounded too old-fashioned and banal.
LESTER, Joel (1989). Analytic Approach to Twentieth-Century Music. New York: Norton.