You are on page 1of 1

ACRE VS.

YUTTIKKI

FACTS:

Sofronio Acre, Jr. Married Evangeline Yuttikki while his prior marriage with Beatriz Acre was still
subsisting. Sofronio and Evangeline acquired properties where one parcel of land was
registered in the name of Evangeline Yuttikki, married to Sofronio Acre Jr. The other parcel of
land was registered in the name of Evangeline Yuttiki, married to Sofronio Acre, and Nellie Y.
Del Mar, married to Jose del Mar. Sofronio died after more than 24 years of union with
Evangeline.

The Acres filed a complaint for reconveyance and recovery of properties and/or partition with
damages. They alleged that Sofronio alone acquired the subject properties with his fund.

The trial court dismissed the complaint. The CA affirmed the decision of the trial court.

ISSUE:
1. Whether or not Evangeline is the owner of the contested properties.

Held:

1. Yes. Evangeline is the exclusive owner of the contested properties. The property regime of
Evangeline and Sofronio falls under the Article 148 of the Family Code, considering that their
marriage is bigamous. Under Art 148, properties acquired by the parties through their actual
joint contribution shall be governed by the rules on co-ownership. If there is no contribution
from either or both of the spouses, there can be no co-ownership. The Acres failed to present
any evidence to establish that Sofronio made an actual contribution in acquiring the contested
properties. Clearly, co-ownership does not exist here. The certificate of title on its face show
that the one property were exclusively owned by Evangeline, and the other was co-owned by
her with her sister. The rule is well-settled that the words "married to" preceding Sofronio Acre,
Jr are merely descriptive of the civil status of Evangeline.

You might also like