ffi*m ffitffdqffidryEtrffirk.

sTffiffi H"'{#TA', {?*', FiEIT',Hq',} ffif Sry,#.H

ffi *de cm &sd Fre*g$a & f, * rr$ dm N" ff mrpm rm f;&ffi xs mff Hsx d$m fi"&d.
ffiffi#ryeYffie & #*vt. {:f *nd** {&#tralsery q:f ffi*Etw*v,s} E*'rt*rpriis*

No. BRC/S&TISTP-'tr TlSSSrO&Cfi Dated: 04.S{.2S'! S

GG IU'S&T/WN FC -I I'DFCG I L,
5th FloorPragati Maid*rfi,
Metro station Buildins Gomplex,
New Delhi-t{0001

Sub :- Comments on Typical Route Control Chart for Crossing Station (Varediya),
Rev.F.

Ref :- OCGC Letter no. UOCGC/DFCC/CMT/STP-17117121U27 dated 18.12.2017

The Typical Route Control Ghart for Crossing Station Varediya, Rev. 'F' has
gone through scrutiny at CPMA/adodara unit and the following observations are made:

1. lt is not understood that why the overlap route i.e. to and fro from Hot Axle
Siding 1 is locked for Calling-ON movement to main and loop line berthing i.e. Sl. No.3
and 6. Although it is safe to restrict but compromises flexibili$.Co may decide.
2. For Sl. No.5, route Sg8-04A and Sg8-048 should also be locked.
3. For Sl. No.10, lt is not clear that why the back locking is proved from 5002XT
which is right from the block section.
4. For Sl. No. 15, No approach locking is provided for S42 although similar
movement Sl. No. 13 S41 has route no241BXT locked.
5. ln SL. No. 21 ,22,24, main route signal movement should be locked in its Calling
ON movement. e.g. main route i.e. $98-02AA should also be locked with its calling ON
movement i.e. C98-02AA.
6. For Sl. No. 28, there is no route S98-MAA, it should be replaced by S98-04A.
7. For Sl. No. 32, when route C98-04A is locked, S98-048 and Sg8-04A should
also be locked. c

8. For Sl. No. 35, 36 and 38 routes, the Home signal movement should also be
locked with shunt movement in the same route. Eg. the Home signal movement such
as S1-03AA should also be locked with route SH'!40-SH112.
9.For Sl. No. 39, it is not clear that why back locking of 42Xf is not provided.
10. ln general, it is observed that for many routes, the Overlaps have been proved
under "Lock Routes" column in addition to main route. eg. Sl. No.36, OV2-39 is also
proved in addition to movement S39-038A. The purpose of proving overlaps
additionally under route is not clear. C.O. may decide.

{Ghanshyam D-##&rni}
Ch ief Project ltflanager
DFCCIL/Vadodara

C altor,eh & $Degffir*d 0lffice: Sft Ftrr}or" Ftla$di *iB#ar* *#e€r{, Staei.atr} Ae*(*irrg Corlr$s.€'., Stsu, De*tlt - 1"!A {K"t-
Froleet {}ffic,e {l,adio,rlara llni!}: 4u!F}cc},-" E}lcck'Fr'" lta*rnarra e&ail'er E[ranruar1, SS*e- fkrifdlirlg" CMlasri Jakd $daka,
\lraded*s - 398S$e, Te&e: ffi&-374n@!!, f*: ll2r65-378lE,3e7
Cspor* &{fcr6itfr lt*rmr&r" : [J6{I2EDL3&{ffi*l*55$5]A