You are on page 1of 1

It is not possible to check the whole report.

- Title is not correct, depending on report, it may be like ‘prospect of tidal energy in Bangladesh’
- Referencing numbers are not correct. How first reference can be number 58!?
- A page of contents should be there after title page.
- Overview box at the beginning of each chapter is not needed.
- They should make their own table. Seems like they simply copy the tables from Wikipedia.
- There was some Simulink modelling approach presented in chapter 9 but have they done it? If
not , then they should be asked to do it.
- Almost every cases, they have taken screenshots of the tables from the papers. Can’t they
simply make table by their own in word?
- Overall, the formatting of articles, figures, captioning are poorly done.
- What amount of improvement has been done up to now is not summarized, also no mention of
future work and recommendations.
- Conclusion is poorly written, should be developed.

You might also like