Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Company Details
Company Details
TABLE 4.1
INFERENCE:
The comparative balance sheet of the year 2013-2014 is as follows.
The share capital of the sbi bank is has in the year of 2013-2014 by 8.3 % and canara bank is has
in the year of 2013-2014 by 3.9 % . The net worth of the sbi bank has increased the reserves and
surplus by 91.5% and canara bank has decreased the reserves and surplus by 5.6% .the total
assets of the increased by canara bank is in 15.64 %. And total assets of the decreased by sbi
bank is in 12.60%.the cash position of the company has fluctuating increase or decreases. The
current liability and provisions of the company is fluctuating year after year.
Table 4.2
INFERENCE:
The comparative balance sheet of the year 2014-2015 is as follows.
The depositions of the sbi bank is has in the year of 2014-2015 by 11.56% and canara bank is
has in the year of 2014-2015 by 11.20% . The net worth of the sbi bank has increased the other
liabilities & provisions by 29.98% and canara bank has decreased the other liabilities &
provisions by 13.71 % .the total assets of the decreased by canara bank is in 10.35%. And
total assets of the increased by sbi bank is in 12.49%.. The current liability sbi bank has
decreased the by 18.8% and canara bank has increased the by 19.49% .
TABLE 4.3
Cash & 129,629.3 115,883 13745.49 10.60 20,664. 21,971.95 1307.95 5.95
balances with 3 .84 05
rbi
Balance with 37,838.33 58,977. 21139.13 35.84 36,069. 26,669.14 9400.47 2.60
banks, money 46 61
at call
Advances 1,463,700 1,300,0 163674.0 11.1 324,71 330,035.5 5320.69 1.61
.42 26.39 3 4.82 1
Investments 477,097.2 495,027 17930.12 3.62 142,30 145,346.1 3036.88 2.08
8 .40 9.30 8
Gross block 9,819.16 9,329.1 490 4.9 7,198.1 6,949.45 248.65 3.45
6 0
Revaluation 0.00 0.00 0 0 5,444.6 5,405.85 38.81 0.71
reserves 6
Net block 9,819.16 9,329.1 490 4.9 1,753.4 1,543.60 209.84 11.96
6 4
Other assets 140,408.4 68,835. 71572086 50.9 22,004. 17,028.32 4976.57 22.6
1 55 89
Total assets 2,259,063 2,048,0 210883.2 9.33 547,51 542,594.7 4921.41 0.89
.05 79.80 5 6.11 0
Contingent 1,064,167 1,093,4 29254.86 2.67 314,50 297,258.6 17249.87 5.48
liabilities .65 22.51 8.56 9
Book value 185.85 172.04 13.81 7.43 481.75 556.68 74.93 13.46
(rs)
INFERENCE:
the comparative balance sheet of the year 2015-2016 is as follows.
The total share capital of the sbi bank is has decreased in the year of 2015-2016 by 3.8 % and
canara bank is has increased in the year of 2015-2016 by 12.48 % . The net worth of the sbi
bank has increased the other liabilities & provisions by 9.33 % and canara bank has decreased
the other liabilities & provisions by 0.8% .the total assets of the decreased by canara bank is
in 0.89 %. And total assets of the increased by sbi bank is in 9.33%.. The current liability sbi
bank has decreased the by 2.67 % and canara bank has increased the by 5.48% .
TABLE 4.4
INFERENCE:
the comparative balance sheet of the year 2016-2017is as follows.
The total share capital of the sbi bank is has increased in the year of 2016-2017 by 21.07 %
and canara bank is has decreased in the year of 2016-2017by 9.09% . The net worth of the sbi
bank has increased the total liabilities & provisions by 74.58% and canara bank has decreased
the other liabilities & provisions by 5.9 % .the total assets of the decreased by canara bank is
5.2 %. And total assets of the increased by sbi bank is in 15.52%.. The current liability sbi bank
has decreased the by 4.30% and canara bank has increased the by 31.57%
RATIO ANALYSIS
Originally, the bankers used the current ratio to judge the capacity
of the borrowing business enterprises to repay the loan and make regular interest
payments. Today it has assumed to be important tool that anybody connected with the
business turns to ratio for measuring the financial strength and the earning capacity of the
business.
Gross NPA Ratio is the ratio of gross NPA to gross advances of the Bank. Gross NPA is the sum
of all loan assets that are classified as NPA as per the RBI guidelines. The ratio is to be counted
in terms of percentage and the formula for GNPA is as follows:
*100
Gross advances
TABLE 4.5
INTERPRETATION
The above table and graph makes it very clear that the average gross NPA of all the banking
under study is very satisfactory. It is seen that the gross NPA which was 6.36 at canarabank and
6.2 % at SBI in years of 2013 increased the marginally every year and finally reached 7.3 % at
canarabank in 2014 and 8.9 % of the GNPA increased by the SBI compared to the canara bank
which is much lower than the average gross NPA (5.8 %) at canara bank in the years of 2017.. It
goes without saying that the banking are taking good care and following ideal norms of granting
advances, so that the recovery is satisfactory leading to lower gross NPA. It is very encouraging
that the gross NPA ratio in the last three years is very much lower than the average 6.36% at
canara bank in the years of 2013,2015,2016 and very much increase than the average 8.8% at
SBI bank in the years of 2015,2016 and 2017 .
CHART 4.1
7.30% 5.80%
10.00% 6.36%
8.00% CANARA BANK
6.00% SBI
8.90% 8.80% 8.10%
4.00% 7.00%
6.20%
2.00%
0.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
year
NET NON PERFORMING ASSETS RATIO
The net NPA percentage is the ratio of net NPA to net advances, in which the provision is to be
deducted from the gross advance. The provision is to be made for NPA account.
TABLE 4.6
INTERPRETATION
The above graph presents the net NPA ratio of all the selected banking taken together. it can be
noticed that net NPA ratio has resulted in the five years of study i.e. from 2013-2017.
The net NPA ratio during these years can be ascribed to the high net NPA position of the state
bank of india. The bank had failed to make sufficient provisions against NPA in these years.
however, they succeeded in making provisions and thus they could bring the net NPA ratio is
SBI bank in year of 2013,2014,2015,2016,,2017 through is 3.11%,1.02%,1.87%,2.3 % and 1.9%.
the net NPA ratio of the canara bank in the year 2013,2014,2015,2016,and 2017 is decrease the
ratio from 1.76%, 2.72 %,1.70%,1.92% and 1.48 %improvement of the above bank. it is to be
seen that the position of all other banks has been very good net NPA ratio. It is therefore, evident
that banks have been able to make enough provisions against their gross NPA which is a very
satisfactory position. The management of all these banks have taken enough care in granting
advances and they have been very meticulous in recovering from defaulters. Another observation
is that the above banks have strictly followed the RBI guidelines by making provisions against
NPAS.
CHART 4.6
4.00%
3.50% 1.92%
3.00%
1.70% 1.48%
2.50% 2.72% CANARA BANK
2.00%
3.11% SBI
1.50%
2.30%
1.00% 1.87% 1.90%
0.50% 1.02%
0.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
YEAR
It is the ratio of gross NPA to total asset of the bank. It has been direct bearing on return
on assets as well as liquidity risk management of the bank. The formula for that is:
PROPLEM ASSETS RATIO: = GROSS NPA *100
TOTAL ASSETS
TABLE 4.7
INTERPRETATION
The Problem assets ratio shows the proportion of Gross NPA to total assets and the table &
graph given above shows that the percentage of all selected banking is SBI and canarabank the
problem assets ration increased from the SBI at 5.73 % from years of 2016 and decreased from
the 4.2% at years of 2013.and average propel assets ratio from SBI at 4.7 % in the years of 20 14
and 2015.The percentage Shown is, however not stable. It was reducing from PA ratio from
canarabank at 2014 and 2015 as 4.55% and 4.05% but it went slightly down in the year
2013,2016,2017 through ratio is 3.70% ,3.72 % and 3.44%. It seems that much attention has
been given by the management to the proportion of Gross NPA and total assets of the bank. The
gross NPA is on the rise due to the increase in advances.
CHART 4.7
Provisions are to be made for to keep safety against the NPA, & it directly affect on the gross
profit of the Banks. The provision Ratio is nothing but total provision held for NPA to gross
NPA of the Banks.
The formula for that is,
INTERPRETATION
The above table and graph makes it very clear that the average total provision ratio of all the
banking under study is very satisfactory. It is seen that the total provision ratio which was
39.11% at canarabank years of 2017 and 25.69 % at SBI in years of 2016 increased the
marginally every year and finally reached 48.1 % at canarabank in 2016 and 31.53% of the total
provision ratio decreased by the SBI compared to the canara bank which is much lower than the
average total provision ratio (19.33%) at canara bank in the years of 2015.. It goes without
saying that the banking are taking good care and following ideal norms of granting advances, so
that the recovery is satisfactory leading to lower total provision ratio. It is very encouraging that
total provision ratio in the last three years is very much lower than the average 19.6% at canara
bank in the years of 2013,2014,2015 and very much increase than the average 25.78% at SBI
bank in the years of 2013,2015 and 2016.
CHART 4.8
60.00%
50.00% 48.10% 39.11%
40.00%
19.58% 19.67%
19.33% CANARABANK
30.00%
SBI
20.00% 31.53%
25.78% 24.97% 22.27% 25.69%
10.00%
0.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
YEAR
CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is also known as Capital to Risk (Weighted) Assets Ratio
(CRAR), is the ratio of a bank's capital to its risk. National regulators track a bank's CAR to
ensure that it can absorb a reasonable amount of loss and complies with statutory Capital
requirements.
Description: It is measured as
Capital Adequacy Ratio = (Tier I + Tier II + Tier III (Capital funds)) /Risk weighted assets
The risk weighted assets take into account credit risk, market risk and operational risk.
The Basel III norms stipulated a capital to risk weighted assets of 8%. However, as per RBI
norms, Indian scheduled commercial banks are required to maintain a CAR of 9% while Indian
public sector banks are emphasized to maintain a CAR of 12%.
Capital adequacy ratios (CARs) are a measure of the amount of a bank's core capital expressed as
a percentage of its risk-weighted asset.
Two types of capital are measured: tier one capital ({\displaystyle T_{1}} above),
which can absorb losses without a bank being required to cease trading, and tier two
capital ({\displaystyle T_{2}} above), which can absorb losses in the event of a
winding-up and so provides a lesser degree of protection to depositors
TABLE 4.9
INTERPRETATION
The capital adequacy ratio indicates the scope for improvement in NPA. The higher the ratio, the
better is position of recovering the advances. From the above table and graph it is found that
capital adequacy ratio average form the every years of SBI 0.4% and capital adequacy ratio
average form the every years of canara bank 0.1 % ratio has been decreasing in the first five
years of study and increased a little in the last three years. The variations in the capital adequacy
ratio are caused by the higher percentage of doubtful assets over capital adequacy ratio in some
of the banks. The management should take necessary Measures to reduce capital adequacy ratio.
CHART 4.9
0.25%
0.20%
0.30% CANARABANK
0.15%
SBI
0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.10%
0.05%
0.04% 0.04% 0.03% 0.02%
0.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
year