BAB 1

Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam

Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman khusus pengembangan silabus dan penilaian. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama, Direktorat
Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Treagust, D. F., & Chittleborough, G. 2001. Chemistry: A matter of understanding

representations. Advances in Research on Teaching, 8, 239-267

Wilis, R. D. 2011. Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Erlangga

Chang, R. (2003). Kimia dasar : Konsep-konsep inti. Penerjemah : Martoprawiro, M. A., dkk.
Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga

Önder, I., Geban, Ö. 2006. The Effect of Conceptual Change Text Oriented Instruction on
Students’ Understanding of The Solubility Equilibrium Concept. Journal of Education, 30: 166-
173.

Raviolo, Andres. 2001. Assesing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Solubility Equilibrium.

Journal of Chemical Education, 78 (5): 629-631.

Ulfah, Tya. 2015. Analisa kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan
Pada Siswa SMA Inshafuddin Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan
Kimia (JIMPK)-Vol 1. No.4(43-51)

Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and
psychology. New York: Holt, Rinechart and Winston.

Novak, J. D. (Ed.) (1987). Proceeding of the second international seminar misconception and
educational strategies in science and mathematics. 1, 2, 3. Ithaca, New York: Cornell
University.

Tan, D.K-C. dan Treagust, D.F. (1999). “Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical
bonding”. School Science Review, 81, 75–83.

Tuysuz, Chengiz. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’
understanding in chemistry. Academic Journals.
BAB 2

Firman, H. (2000). Penilaian Hasil belajar Dalam pengajaran Kimia. Bandung: Jurusan
Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI.

Suwarto dan Afghohani, A.(2011)Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam program komputer.

Sukoharjo: LPPM Univet Bantara.

Gronlund, N.E.. (1982). Constructing Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Tinambunan, W. (1988). Evaluation of student achievement. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Purnamasari, R. (2012). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice untuk mengukur
pemahaman konsep pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI,
Bandung.

Chandrasegaran, Treagust, D. F and Mocerino, M. “The development of a two-tier multiple-

choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and
explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation”. Chemistry Education
Research and Practice, 8 (3), 293-307.

Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge”. Dalam Glynn,
S.M & Duit, R. (Penyunting), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (hlm.
327-346). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pabuçcu, A & Geban, O. (2006). “Remediating misconceptions concerning chemical bonding

through conceptual change text”. H.U. Journal of Education. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30,
184-192.

Sukardi. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan : Prinsip dan operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28,

563 – 575.

Kamus Indonesia 2007

Woodruff (dalam Amin, 1987

Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsespsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya
Wacana.

Duit, R. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving
science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (6), 671–688.

Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika. Jakarta:
Grasindo.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). “A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation”. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 22, 53-62.

Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching,

learning and retention. UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings.

Winkel, W. S. (1991). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta : PT Grasindo.

Woolfolk, A.E., & McCune-Nicolich, L. (1984). Educational psychology for teachers. Edisi
kedua. New Jersey : Prentice Hall Inc.

Sari, N.K.E. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier sebagai instrumen alternatif untuk
mendeteksi miskonsespsi siswa sma pada materi laju reaksi. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.

Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. (1983). “Learning science : A generative process”. Science

Education, 67 (4), 489 – 508.

Parning,dkk.2006. “Kimia SMA Kelas XI Semester 2”. Jakarta : Yudhistira

Petrucci,R.H. 1987.”Kimia Dasar-Prinsip dan Terapan Modern”. Terjemahan Suminar Achmadi.

Jakarta : Erlangga

Sudarmo,U.2006. “Kimia untuk SMA/MA Kelas XI”. Jakarta : Phibeta Aneka Gama

Purnamasari, Rose. 2012. Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Dan Manfaatnya Dalam
Mengukur Konsepsi Kimia Siswa SMA. J.Pen.Pend.Kim,2014, 1(1), 51—58

Jatmiko, Arum. 2010. Analisis miskonsepsi Materi Hasil Kali Kelarutan dan Strategi
Pemecahannya pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Boja. (Skripsi). FMIPA UNNES, Semarang

BAB 3

Ditjen PMPTK. (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta:
Depdiknas.

Sugiyono.(2012). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28,

563 – 575.

1937, Kuder dan Richardson

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Edisi Pertama. Bandung: Rosda.

Bayrak, B.K. (2013). “Using two-tier test to identify primary student’s conceptual understanding
and alternative conceptions in acid base”. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3 (2), 19 –
26.

Tarakchi, M., dkk. (1999). “A cross-age study of high school student’s understanding of
diffusion and osmosis”. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 84 – 93.