DAFTAR RUJUKAN

Adadan, E., Trundle, K.C. & Irving, K.E. 2010. Exploring Grade 11 Students’
Conceptual Pathways of the Particulate Nature of Matter in the Context
of Multirepresentational Instruction. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 47 (8): 1004-1035.
Al-Balushi, S.M., Ambusaidi, A.K., Al-Shuaili, A.H. & Taylor, N. 2012. Omani
Twelfth Grade Students’ Most Common Misconception in Chemistry.
Science Education International, 23 (3): 221-240.
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. Kerangka Landasan untuk
Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Terjemahan Agung
Prihantoro.2010.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ardhana, W. 1983. Kesanggupan Berpikir Formal A La Piaget dan Kemajuan
Belajar di Sekolah. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca
Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Ari, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Razavieh, A. Tanpa Tahun. Pengantar Penelitian dalam
Pendidikan. Terjemahan Arief Furchan. 2004. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. & Jabar, C.S.A. 2010. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman
Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Barke, H. D., Hazari, A. & Yitbarek, S. 2009. Misconceptions in Chemistry.
Berlin: Springer.

Bayrak, B.K. 2013. Using Two-Tier Test to Identify Primary Students’

Conceptual Understanding and Alternative Conceptions in Acid Base.
Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3 (2): 19-26.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein. 1986. Is an Atom of Copper Malleable.
Journal of Chemical Education, 63: 64-66.

Ben-Zvi R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein J. 1987. Students’ visualization of a Chemical

reaction. Education Chemistry, 24: 117-120.
Berg, V.D. 1991. Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi. Sebuah Pengantar
Berdasarkan Lokakarya di Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga,
7-10 Agustus 1990. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Blanco, A. & Prieto,T. 1997. Pupils’ Views on How Stirring and Temprature
Affect The Dissolution of a Solid in a Liquid: A Cross-age Study (12 to
18). International Journal of Science Education, 19 (3): 303-315.
79
 80

Boo, H.K. 1998. Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics
of chemical reactions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (5):
569–581.

Briggs, H. & Holding, B. 1986. Aspects of Secondary Students’ Understanding

of Elementary Ideas in Chemistry: Full Report Children’s Learning in
Science Project Leeds: University of Leeds.

Brook, A., Briggs, H. & Driver, R. 1984. Aspects of Secondary Students’

Understanding of The Particulate Nature of Matter Children’s Learning in
Science Project Leeds: University of Leeds.
Bunce, D.M. 2001. Online Symposium: Piaget, Constructivism, and Beyond:
Does Piaget Atill Have Anything to Say to Chemist?. Journal of
Chemical Education, 78: 1107.

Bunce D.M. & Gabel D. 2002. Differential Effects on The Achievement of Males
and Females Teaching The Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal Researc
Science Education, 39: 911-927.
Butts, B. & Smith, R. 1987. HSC Chemistry Students’ Understanding of the
Structure and Properties of Molecular and Ionic Compounds. Research
in Science Education, 17: 192-210.

Cakmakci, G. 2010. Identifying Alternative Conceptions of Chemical Kinetics

Among Secondary School and Undergraduate Students in Turkey.
Journal of Chemical Education, 87 (4): 449-455.

Carey, F.A. 2000. Organic Chemistry. 4 th Edition. New York: The Mc Graw-Hill
Companies.

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F. & Mocerino, M. 2007. The Development

of A Two-tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating
Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical
Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 8 (3): 293-307

Chiu, M. 2005. A National Survey of Students’ Conceptions in Chemistry in

Taiwan. Paper based on the lecture presented at the 18th ICCE, Instanbul,
Turkey, 3-8 Agustus 2004. Chemical Education International, 6 (1).
(Online), (www.iupac.org/publications/cei), diakses 21 September 2013.

Coll, R.K. & Taylor, N. 2001. Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held
by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science &
Technological Education, 19 (2): 171-191.

Coll, R.K. & Taylor, N. 2002. Mental Models in Chemistry:Senior Chemistry

Students’ Mental Models of Chemical Bonding. Chemistry Education
Research and Practice in Europe Research Report, 3(2): 175-184.
 81

Coll, R.K. 2008. Chemistry Learners’ Preferred Mental Models for Chemical
Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1): 22-47.

Dinihari, P. 2004. Analisis Kesalahan Konsep dalam Ikatan Kimia Berdasarkan

Gambaran Mikroskopis pada Siswa SMU Negeri Sumberpucung dan
Upaya Memperbaikinya dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Tesis tidak
diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

De Posada, J.M. 1999. The Presentation of Metallicc Bonding in High School

Science Texbooks During Three Decades: Science Educational Reforms
and Substantive Changes of Tendencies. Science Education, 83: 423-447.

Dhinda, H.S. & Treagust, D.F. 2009. Conseptual Understanding Of Bruneian

Tertiary Students: Chemical Bonding And Structure. Brunei Int. J. of Sci
& Math. Edu, 1 (1): 33-51.
Effendy. 2008. Teori VSEPR, Kepolaran, dan Gaya Antarmolekul (Edisi 2).
Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Effendy. 2013. Reparasi Kesalahan dalam Pembelajaran Konsep Kimia. Makalah
disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Kimia, Jurusan Kimia FPMIPA UM,
Malang, 9 Juni 2013.
Ferouni, A., Khyati, A., Talbi, M., El Jamali, S. & Radid, M. 2010. Identification
of a few Difficulties in Chemistry in Moroccans High School: Case of the
Redox. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ): 101-107.
(Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com), diakses 10 Juli 2013.

Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V. & Hunn, D. 1987. Understanding the Particulate
Nature of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64 (8) : 695-696.

Good, R., Kromhout, R.A. & Mellon, E.K. 1979. Piaget’s Work and Chemical
Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 56 (7): 426-430.

Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. 1992a. Conceptual difficulties ezperience by senior
high school students of electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and Oxidation-
Reduction Equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2):
121-142.

Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. 1992b. Conceptual difficulties ezperience by senior
high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and
electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6): 1079-
1099.

Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K. R. 1992. Grade-12 Students’ Misconseptions

Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6): 2611-2628.
 82

Heredia, K., Xu, X. & Lewis, J.E. 2012. The Application and Evaluation of A
Two-Concept Diagnostic Instrument with Students Entering College
General Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practise,
13:hlm.30-38, (Online), dalam RSC Publishing (http://pubs.rsc.org |
doi:10.1039/C0RP90017F), diakses 7 Pebruari 2012.

Herron, J.D. 1975. Piaget for Chemists, Explaining What “Good” Student Cannot
Understand. Journal of Chemical Education, 52 (3): 146-150.
Hoz, R., Bowman, D. & Kozminsky, E. 2001. The Differential Effects of Prior
Knowledge on Learning: A Study of Two Consecutive Courses in Earth
Science. Instructional Science, 29: 187-211.

Johari, J.M.C. & Rachmawati, M. 2004. Kimia SMA untuk Kelas X. Jakarta: Esis.
Khang, G.N. & Sai, C.L. Tanpa Tahun. Students’ Learning Difficulties on
Covalent Bonding and Structure Concepts. Teaching and
Learning:Institute of Education Singapura, 12 (2): 58-65.

Kelly, R.S., Barrera, J.H. & Mohamed, S.C. 2010. An Analysis of Undergraduate
General Chemistry Student’s Misconceptions of the Submicroscopic
Level of Precipitation Reactions. Chemical Education Research, 87(1):
113-118.

Kelly, J., Krausc, S. & Baker, D. 2010. A Pre-Post Topic Assessment Tool for
Uncovering Misconceptions and Assessing Their Repair and Conceptual
Change. A Paper presented to 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education
Conference. 27-30 Oktober 2010, Washington, DC, (online), (http://fie-
conference.org/fie2010/papers/1748.pdf, diakses 13 Januari 2013.

Kean, E. & Middlecamp. 1985. Panduan Belajar Kimia Dasar. Jakarta:

Gramedia.
Kelter, P.B., Carr, J.D. & Scott, A. 2003. Chemistry: A World of Choices, Second
Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Lahti, R.D. 2012. Does Attainment of Piaget’s Formal Operational Level of

Cognitive Development Predict Student Understanding of Scientific
Models?. Dissertation, The University of Montana, Desember 2012.
Dalam Scirus database, (Online), (http://www.scirus.com), diakses 10
Juli 2013.

Lin, S.W. 2004. Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test for
High School Students’ understanding of Flowering Plant Growth and
 83

Development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics

Education, 2(2): 175-199.

Muchtar, Z. & Harizal. 2012. Analyzing of Students’ Misconceptions on Acid-

Base Chemistry at Senior High Schools in Medan. Journal of Education
and Practice, 3 (15): 65-74.
Mulford, D.R. & Robinson, W. R. 2002. An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions
Among First-Semester General Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical
Education, 79 (6): 739-744.
Nyachwaya, J.M., Mohamed, A.R., Roehrig, G.H.,Wood, N.B., Kern, A.L. &
Schneider, J.L. 2011. The Development of An Open-Ended Drawing
Tool: An Alternative Diagnostic Tool for Assessing Student’s
Undestanding of The Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of The Royal
Society of Chemistry, 12: 121-132.

Naah, B.M. & Sanger, M.J. 2012. Student Misconceptions in Writing Balanced
Equations for Dissolving Compounds in Water. Chemical Education
Research and Practice, 13: 186-194.
Nakhleh, M.B. 1992. Why Some Student Don’t Learn Chemistry (Chemical
Misconceptions). Journal of Chemical Education, 59 (3): 191-194.
Nicoll, G.A. 2001. Report of Undergraduates’ Bonding Misconception.
International Journal of Science Education, 23 (7): 707-730.

Novick, S. & J. Nussbaum. 1981. Pupils’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature

of Matter: A Cross-age Study. Science Education 65(2): 187-196.

Othman, J., Treagust, D.F. & Chandrasegaran, A.L. 2007. An Investigation Into
the Relationship Between Student’s Conceptions of the Particulate
Nature of Matter and Their Undestanding of Chemical Bonding. A paper
presented at Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference,
Singapore, May.
Osborne R.J. & Gilbert , J. K. 1980. An Approach: Student’s Understanding of
Basic Concept in Science. Institute of Educational Technology
University of Surrey.
Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F. & Gilbert, J.K. 1983. Science Teaching and Children’s
View of The World. European Journal Science Education, 5: 1-14.
Özmen, H. 2005. Misconceptions in Chemistry Teaching: A Literature Review,
(Online), (http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2005cilt3/sayi_1/23-45.pdf),
diakses 1 Maret 2005.
 84

Özmen, H. 2007. The Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Texts in Remediating

High School Students’ Alternative Conceptions Concerning Chemical
Equilibrium. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3): 413-425.

Pabuçcu, A. & Geban, O. 2006. Remediating Misconception Concerning

Chemical Bonding Through Conceptual Change Text. Heceliepe
Universitesi Journal of Education, 30:184-192.
Pavelich, M.J & Abraham, M.R. 1979. An Inquiry Formal Laboratory Program
for General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical education, 56 (2): 100 -103.
Pavelich, M.J & Abraham, M.R. 1977. Guided Inquiry Laboratories for General
Chemistry Student. Journal of College Science, 7 (1): 23-26.
Peterson, R.F. & Treagust, D.F. 1989. Grade-12 Students’ Misconceptions of
Covalent Bonding and Structure. Journal of Chemical Education, 66 (6):
459-460.
Peterson, R.F.,Treagust, D.F. & Garnett, P.1989. Development and Application of
a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade 11 and 12 Students Concepts
of Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a Course of Instruction.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4): 301-314.
Peterson, R.,Treagust, D.F. & Garnett, P. 1986. Identification of Secondary
Students’ Misconceptions of Covalent Bonding and the Structure
Concepts Using a Diagnostic Instrument. Research in Science Education.
16: 40-48.
Pikoli, M. 2003. Identifikasi Kesalahan Konsep dalam Ikatan Kimia pada
Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia IKIP Negeri Gorontalo dan
Upaya Memperbaikinya dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Tesis tidak
diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Prescott, A. & Mitchelmore, M. 2005. In Chick, H.L & Vincent, J.L (Eds).
Proceedings of The 29th Conference of The International Group for The
Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4: 97-104. Melbourne: PME

Purba, M. 2004. Kimia untuk SMA kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Renner, J.W. & Lawson, A.E. 1983. Piagetian Theory and Instruction in Physics.
The Physics Teacher, 11: 165-169.
Schollum, B. 1982. Reactions: A Working Paper of The Learning in Science
Project (No.37). New Zealand: University of Waikato, Hamilton.
Setyosari, P. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sheehan, M., Childs, P.E. & Hayes, S. 2011. The Chemical Misconceptions of
Pre-service Science Teachers at the University of Limerick: Do they
 85

change?. Knowing and Communicating Science in the Classroom -

Proceedings of the IOSTE Mini-Symposium, Reading 20/21 June 2011:
National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching
and Learning, University of Limerick (Online), (http://cms.uni-
kassel.de/unicms), diakses 7 September 2013.

Skelly, K.M. & Hall, D. 1993. The Development and Validation of A

Categorization of Sources of Misconceptions in Chemistry. A Paper
Presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and
Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Ithaca, New York, 1-
4 August.

Schmidt, H.J. 1997. Students’ Misconceptions: Looking for a Pattern. Science

Education, 81: 123-135.

Smith, K.C. & Nakhleh, M. 2011. University Students’ Conceptions of Bonding

in Melting and Dissolving Phenomena. Chemistry Education Research
and Practise, 12: hlm. 398-408, (Online), dalam RSC Publishing
(http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C1RP90048J), diakses 2 Pebruari 2013.

Sudijono, A. 2011. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sutresna, N. 2004. Kimia untuk SMA Kelas I (Kelas X) Semester 1. Bandung:
Grafindo Media Pratama.

Taber, K.S. 1993. Student Conceptions of Chemical Bonding: Using Interviews to

Follow The Development of A Level Students' Thinking. Paper presented to
the Conference on On-going Research, Facets of Education - Dimensions
of Research. June 1993,Institute of Educational Research and
Development, University of Surrey, (online),
(http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ documents/ 00001483.htm), diakses 13
Januari 2013.

Taber, K.S. 1997. Student Understanding of Ionic Bonding: Molecular versus

elektrostatic Thingking?. School Science Review, 78 (285): 85-95.

Taber, K.S. 2003. Understanding Ionisation Energy: Physical, Chemical and

Alternative Conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,
4(2): 149.

Tamir, P. 1989. Some Issues Related to The Use of Justifications to Multiple-

Choice Answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23: 285-292.

Tan, D.K. & Treagust, D.F. 1999. Evaluating Student’s Understanding of

Chemical Bonding. School Science Review, 81 (294): 75-83.
 86

Tan, K. D., Goh, N., Chia, L. & Treagust, D. F. 2002. Development and
Application of A Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrument to
Assess High School Student' Understanding of Inorganic Chemistry
Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4):
283-301.
Tan, K.D., Taber, K., Goh, N.K. & Sai, C.L. 2005. The Ionisation Energy
Diagnostic Instrument: A Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument to
Determine High School Student’s Undestanding of Ionisation Energy.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (4):180-197.
Tan, K.D., Goh, N.K. & Sai, C.L. 2000. Students’ Conceptions of Ionic Bonding.
REACT: National Institute of Education Singapure, (Online), 1: 15-20,
(http://repository.nie.edu.sg/jspui/bitstream/10497/3818/1/REACT-2000-
1-15.pdf), diakses 20 September 2013.
Timberlake, K.C. & Timberlake, W. 2008. Basic chemistry 2nd.ed. USA: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Treagust, D.F. & Haslam, F. 1986. Evaluating Secondary Students’
Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants Using A Two-
Tier Diagnostic Instrument. A Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of
the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Fransisco,
California, Marc 28-31.
Treagust, D.F. 2006. Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a means to Improving
Teaching, Learning and Retention. Paper presented at the UniServe
Science Symposium: Assessment in science teaching and learning,
Universe Science, Sydney, Australia.
Tsui, C. & Treagust, D.F. 2010. Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific
Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument.
International Journal of Science Education, 32 (8): 1073-1098.
Tüysüz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess
Student’s Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research And Essay, 4
(6): 626-631.
Ünal, S., Çalik, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. 2006. A Review of Chemical Bonding
Studies: Needs, Aims, Methods of Exploring Student’ Conceptions,
General Knowledge Claims and Students’ Alternative Conceptions.
Researc in Science & Technological Education, 24(2): 141-172.
Ünal, S., CoȘtu, B. & Ayas, A. 2010. Secondary School Student’s Misconceptions
of Covalent Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2): 3-29.

Wiseman, F.L. 1981. The Teaching of College Chemistry, Role of Student

Development Level. Journal of Chemical Education, 58 (6): 484-488.
 87

Wibowo, A.M. 2006. Remidi Kesalahan Konsep Ikatan Kimia pada Siswa SMA
Negei 1 Batu Melalui Perbaikan Bahan Ajar. Tesis tidak diterbitkan.
Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.