Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e926 GAMALELDIN et al
ARTICLES
ⱖ55 4 1.6
e928 GAMALELDIN et al
ARTICLES
tors (Fig 1A), a threshold of 25.4 mg/dL tensive phototherapy or perform the
identified 90% of affected infants, but more risky exchange transfusion, as
93% of the 94 infants without disease currently recommended. In some envi-
also had a TSB level greater than this ronments, the risk of exchange trans-
threshold (FPR: 93%). Ten percent of fusion19–21 may exceed the risk of BE in
infants with disease had a TSB level of this group of patients.
ⱖ43 mg/dL. The area under the curve The AAP guidelines do not rank the risk
was only 0.595 and was further re- of hemolytic disease according to eti-
duced to 0.533 when ABO incompatibil- ology or severity, but logistic regres-
ity was eliminated, indicating no de- sion indicated that ABO with associ-
monstrable association between TSB ated anemia (the direct antiglobulin
value and disease over the range of 25 test was unreliable) had far less influ-
to 43 mg/dL. ence on outcome than Rh incompatibil-
In the absence of risk factors (Fig 1B), ity. The TSB threshold for severe dis-
the minimum TSB value used to iden- ease was higher in ABO (33.7 mg/dL)
tify all 5 affected infants was 31.5 mg/ than in Rh incompatibility (25.4 mg/
dL; of 106 infants who were disease dL), again indicating that the magni-
free, 74% had TSB levels ranging 25 to tude of risk for BE in hemolytic disease
31.5 mg/dL, and 26% (the FPR) had a depends more on the etiology of hemo-
TSB level of ⬎31.5 mg/dL. The TSB level lysis than on the severity of hyperbili-
at 10% sensitivity was nearly identical rubinemia. On occasion, ABO hemolytic
in infants with and without risk factors disease can present as overt erythro-
present. Despite the difference in blastosis fetalis with severe hemoly-
thresholds and FPR, the confidence in- sis. This was not documented in our
FIGURE 1 patients but might lower the TSB
A, ROC analysis of risk for ABE or BE (BIND score tervals were inconclusive because, in
4 –9) in 138 infants with recognized risk factors; the first case, the threshold was close threshold for neurotoxicity.
threshold TSB and FPRs at 90% sensitivity and to the study entry criterion of 25 mg/
TSB at 10% sensitivity are indicated. The subco-
Infants with sepsis or Rh hemolytic dis-
hort excludes infants charted in B and includes dL, suggesting that the true threshold ease had a low group threshold for dis-
infants with Rh and ABO incompatibility with ev- for outcomes is likely to be lower and, ease, but above 25 mg/dL, up to 43 mg/
idence of hemolysis, sepsis, and/or an admis-
sion weight of ⱕ2700 g. Many patients had ⬎1
in the latter case, the number of af- dL, the TSB value had no apparent
risk factor. The area under the curve was 0.595 fected infants was small (5 with ABE or relationship to outcome (Fig 1A). This
(0.533 when ABO incompatibility was excluded). BE). Notwithstanding these limitations, surprising observation suggests that
B, ROC analysis of risk for ABE or BE (BIND score
4 –9) in 111 infants with no recognized risk fac- the difference in the ROC curves for in- the threshold of 25 mg/dL is permis-
tors; threshold TSB and FPRs at 90% sensitivity fants with and without risk factors to sive of neurotoxicity, but above this
and TSB at 10% sensitivity are indicated. The
subcohort excludes patients with ABO incom-
TSB is striking. threshold, the major determinants
patibility with hematocrit at ⱕ35%, Rh incom- of neurotoxicity involve unidentified
patibility, weight of ⱕ2700 g, and evidence of DISCUSSION plasma and/or host defense variables
sepsis. Only 3 of 111 infants developed ABE (TSB:
31.8 –34.5 mg/dL). Two patients had severe BE In the absence of risk factors for neu- that are altered by neurotoxicity risk
(TSB: 41.8 and 43.2 mg/dL). The area under the rotoxicity, we observed no cases of ABE factors. The sample size precluded de-
curve was 0.857. termining specific thresholds for in-
below a TSB level of 31.8 mg/dL and no
evidence of BE at discharge despite tervention in infants with and without
The sensitivities and FPRs of TSB levels TSB levels of ⬎30 mg/dL in 25 infants. risk factors, and the study entry level
for predicting outcomes in infants with Longer-term outcome studies by New- of TSB ⱖ25 likely concealed the true
and without risk factors are illustrated man et al10,11 also indicate that healthy threshold for infants with sepsis and
in the ROC curves of Figure 1. In con- term infants have a greater tolerance Rh hemolytic disease.22
trast to PPV, we assumed no a priori for severe hyperbilirubinemia. Physi- The reason for the variation in suscep-
threshold for intervention but selected cians treating an asymptomatic infant tibility of infants to a given TSB level is
a TSB value that identified 90% of pa- with no risk factors and a TSB level in unknown. Erythroblastosis fetalis will
tients with disease out of the study the range of 25 to ⱖ30 mg/dL are faced produce a more rapid rate of rise in
population. In the presence of risk fac- with a dilemma of whether to use in- TSB with a higher rate of bilirubin pro-
REFERENCES
1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommit- pears in Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):1138]. Pediat- 3. Newman TB, Klebanoff MA. Neonatal hyper-
tee on Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Clinical rics. 2004;114(1):297–316 bilirubinemia and long-term outcome: an-
practice guideline: management of hyperbili- 2. Newman TB, Maisels MJ. Does hyperbiliru- other look at the Collaborative Perinatal
rubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more binemia damage the brain of full-term in- Project. Pediatrics. 1993;92(5):651– 657
weeks of gestation [published correction ap- fants? Clin Perinatol. 1990;17(2):331–338 4. Johnson LH, Bhutani VK, Brown AK. System-
e930 GAMALELDIN et al
ARTICLES
based approach to the management of neo- rodevelopmental outcomes in the collabor- 22. Hsia DY, Allen FH Jr, Gellis SS, Diamond LK.
natal jaundice and prevention of ker- ative perinatal project. Pediatrics. 2009; Erythroblastosis fetalis. VIII. Studies of se-
nicterus. J Pediatr. 2002;140(4):396 – 403 123(3):1045–1050 rum bilirubin in relation to Kernicterus. N
5. Ip S, Glicken S, Kulig J, Obrien R, Sege R, Lau 13. Johnson L, Brown AK, Bhutani VK. BIND: a Engl J Med. 1952;247(18):668 – 671
J. Management of Neonatal Hyperbiliru- clinical score for bilirubin induced dysfunc- 23. Kaplan M, Hammerman C. Glucose-6-
binemia. Rockville, MD: US Department of tion in newborns. Pediatr Suppl. 1999;104: phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a po-
Health and Human Services, Agency for 746 tential source of severe neonatal hyperbili-
Healthcare Research and Quality; 14. Van Praagh R. Diagnosis of kernicterus in rubinaemia and kernicterus. Semin
2003.AHRQ publication 03-E011 the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 1961;28: Neonatol. 2002;7(2):121–128
6. Ip S, Chung M, Kulig J, et al; American Acad- 870 – 876 24. Ritter DA, Kenny JD, Norton HJ, Rudolph AJ. A
emy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyper- 15. Volpe JJ. Bilirubin and brain injury. In: Volpe prospective study of free bilirubin and
bilirubinemia. An evidence-based review of
JJ, ed. Neurology of the Newborn. 3rd ed. other risk factors in the development of ker-
important issues concerning neonatal hy-
Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2001: nicterus in premature infants. Pediatrics.
perbilirubinemia. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1).
490 –514 1982;69(3):260 –266
Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/
content/full/114/1/e130 16. Adler W, Lausen B. Bootstrap estimated true 25. Cashore WJ, Oh W. Unbound bilirubin and
and false positive rates and ROC curve. kernicterus in low-birth-weight infants. Pe-
7. Bhutani VK, Johnson LH, Maisels MJ, et al.
Comp Stat Data Anal. 2009;53:718 –729 diatrics. 1982;69(4):481– 485
Kernicterus: epidemiological strategies for
its prevention through systems based ap- 17. R Development Core Team (2010). R: a lan- 26. Ahlfors CE, Wennberg RP, Ostrow JD, Tiri-
proaches. J Perinatol. 2004;24(10):650 – 662 guage and environment for statistical com- belli C. Unbound (free) bilirubin: improving
puting [computer program]. R Foundation the paradigm for evaluating neonatal jaun-
8. Wennberg RP, Ahlfors CE, Bhutani VK, John-
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. dice. Clin Chem. 2009;55(7):1288 –1299
son LH, Shapiro SM. Toward understanding
kernicterus: a challenge to improve the ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at: www.R-
27. Wennberg RP, Ahlfors CE, Aravkin AY. Interven-
management of jaundiced newborns [pub- project.org. Accessed February 10, 2011
tion guidelines for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia:
lished correction appears in Pediatrics. 18. Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer an evidence based quagmire. Curr Pharm Des.
2006;117(4):1467]. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2): T. ROCR: visualizing the performance of
2009;15(25):2939–2944
474 – 485 scoring classifiers. R package version 1.0-4
[computer program]. Available at: http:// 28. Shapiro SM. Chronic bilirubin encephalopathy:
9. Johnson L, Bhutani VK, Karp K, Sivieri EM, diagnosis and outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal
Shapiro SM. Clinical report from the pilot CRAN.R-project.org/package⫽ROCR. Ac-
cessed February 10, 2011 Med. 2010;15(3):157–163
USA Kernicterus Registry (1992 to 2004). J
Perinatol. 2009;29(suppl 1):S25–S45 19. Davutoğlu M, Garipardiç M, Güler E, Kara- 29. Chen WX, Wong VC, Wong KY. Neurodevelop-
biber H, Erhan D. The etiology of severe neo- mental outcome of severe neonatal hemo-
10. Newman TB, Liljestrand P, Escobar GJ. In-
natal hyperbilirubinemia and complica- lytic hyperbilirubinemia. J Child Neurol.
fants with bilirubin levels of 30 mg/dL or
more in a large managed care organization. tions of exchange transfusion. Turk J 2006;21(6):474 – 479
Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 pt 1):1303–1311 Pediatr. 2010;52(2):163–166 30. Watchko JF, Jeffrey Maisels M. Enduring
11. Newman TB, Liljestrand P, Jeremy RJ, et al; 20. Behjati Sh, Sagheb S, Aryasepehr S, Yagh- controversies in the management of hyper-
Jaundice and Infant Feeding Study Team. mai B. Adverse events associated with neo- bilirubinemia in preterm neonates. Semin
Outcomes among newborns with total se- natal exchange transfusion for hyperbiliru- Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(3):136 –140
rum bilirubin levels of 25 mg per deciliter or binemia. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76(1):83– 85 31. Sgro M, Campbell D, Barozzino T, Shah V.
more. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(18): 21. Sanpavat S. Exchange transfusion and its Acute neurological findings in a national co-
1889 –1900 morbidity in ten-year period at King Chula- hort of neonates with severe neonatal hy-
12. Kuzniewicz, M, Newman TB. Interaction of longkorn Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005; perbilirubinemia. J Perinatol. 2011;31(6):
hemolysis and hyperbilirubinemia on neu- 88(5):588 –592 392–396