Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Because of the structure of a constant time delay, students are able to practice
and develop proficiency without errors.
After initial instruction, the teacher does a round with a 0 second time delay. That is,
the teacher does not stop and wait for a response between asking the question and
How? providing a prompt, such as pointing to the answer or saying it aloud. Next, the
teacher introduces a time delay after asking each question. If the student does not
respond within that window, then the teacher gives the prompt. If the student gives
an incorrect answer, then the teacher demonstrates the correct answer and moves
on to the next task in the set.
References
Appelman, M., Vail, C. O., & Lieberman-Betz, R. G. (2014). The effects of constant time delay and instructive
feedback on the acquisition of English and Spanish sight words. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(2),
131-148.
Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Martin, C. P. (1990). Comparison of predictable and
unpredictable trial sequences during small-group instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(4), 12-
29.
Hua, Y., Woods-Groves, S., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Scheidecker, B. J. (2013). Effects of vocabulary instruction using
constant time delay on expository reading of young adults with intellectual disability. Focus on autism
and other developmental disabilities, 28(2), 89-100.
Hughes, T. A., & Fredrick, L. D. (2006). Teaching vocabulary with students with learning disabilities using
classwide peer tutoring and constant time delay. Journal of behavioral education, 15(1), 1-23.
Hughes, T. A., Fredrick, L. D., & Keel, M. C. (2002). Learning to effectively implement constant time delay
procedures to teach spelling. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 209-222.