Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 30 08 2007 Dynamic Module of CAESAR II PDF
Lecture 30 08 2007 Dynamic Module of CAESAR II PDF
Is it of any use??
DYNAFLOW
lectures 2007
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -1-
Why is dynamics not used more
Coade: < 5% of Caesar II license holders also makes use of dynamic module
When is it used??
• During design (avoid fatigue, overloading, large displacements)
• Control of Vibration problems (development of mitigation
measures)
Typical Vibration Level Limits conform VDI 3842, Vibrations in Piping Systems
1000.0
Vibration Velocity [mm/s] RMS
100.0
10.0
1.0
1 10 100 1000
Frequency [Hz.]
Application
• Sustained vibrations (compressors & pumps)
Input
• Periodic Loads can be applied at any node in the system
• Per load case one excitation frequency
• Many load cases are possible
Solution method
• Since response frequency equals excitation frequency solution
procedure is quasi static (fast)
Output
• Stress, displacement and load amplitude per frequency
Application
• Transient vibrations: slug, waterhammer, relief
Input
• Load time histories at many nodes in the system
Calculation method
• Load time histories are translated into response spectra (time
phase between different loads is lost)
• Natural frequencies and mode shapes are calculated
• Response for each mode shape is determined
• Mode shape responses are combined into a final system
response
Output
• Maximum stress, largest modal contribution
• Maximum loads, largest modal contribution
• Maximum displacements
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -22-
Response Spectrum Generation
DLF may grow > 2 if time history contains only a limited amount of consistent
periodicity
Application
• Transient vibrations: slug, waterhammer, relief
Input
• Load time histories at many nodes in the system
Calculation method
• Load time histories are maintained (time phase between different loads is
conserved)
• Natural frequencies and mode shapes are calculated
• Response of each mode shape is determined
• Mode shape responses are combined into a final system response
Output
• Maximum stress, actual stress at user defined times (snapshots)
• Maximum loads, actual load at user defined times
• Maximum displacements, actual displacement at user defined times
• By combination of several runs a time history of stress, loads
displacements can be composed
Important when large axial loads are applied (axial mode shapes have
relatively high natural frequencies.
Spectrum
• Frequency domain
• Conservative results: only maximum response per mode shape is
calculated and combined in system response
• Mode making maximum contribution is identified (advantage for
vibration control)
• Only maxima are calculated, time phase is lost
• Number of participating modes is finite (missing mass)
Time history
• Time domain
• More accurate results: time history response per mode is
conserved and time phasing between model maxima is
maintained during combination.
• Load, stress time histories (enables fatigue assessment by means
of cumulative damage, counting of cycles)
• Graphical response is possible
• Modal info is not available
• Calculation is memory intensive (limits simulation duration,
number of participating modes, time step resolution)
• Number of participating modes is finite (missing mass)
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -27-
Quasi-Static Approach
Quasi static approach works when there is only one dominant mode
shape that is excited
Quasi static
• Simple but only if there is one dominant mode shape
Spectrum
• Time phase between several impacts on one system is lost (e.g.
slug hitting consecutive elbows)
• Conservative but output provides clues for problem solving.
Mode with largest contribution is identified.
Time history
• Exact, timing relation between impacts is maintained (slug,
waterhammer)
• Clues for diagnosis are less obvious
Problem
High vibration level in compressor suction piping
Steps to solution
Vibration Measurements, identification of main contributions in
frequency domain
Verification of acoustical natural frequencies of piping system
(acoustical resonance)
Verification of mechanical natural frequencies (mechanical
resonance)
Identification of source of vibration problem
Modification proposal
33 Hz
66 Hz 99 Hz
100.00 49 Hz
16 Hz
83 Hz
80.00
Amplitude (dB)
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Frequency (Hz)
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -38-
Intermediate Conclusion from Step 1
Acoustical resonance
or
Mechanical resonance
or
High pulsation forces without resonance (compressor bottle
sizing problem)
250
16 Hz
200
150
Amplitude
100
50
0
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00
Frequency (Hz)
Vibration peak at 16.5 Hz, most probably is due high shaking forces as a result
of near resonant condition.
90.00 66 Hz.
33 Hz
80.00
70.00
60.00
Amplitude (dB)
83 Hz
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Purple vertical lines represent pipe system natural frequencies
0.00
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Frequency (Hz)
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -42-
Conclusion from Step 3 & Identification Cause of
Vibration Problem
The high vibration level at 49 Hz and 99 Hz. must be the result of:
High pulsation forces without resonance (compressor bottle sizing
problem)
The high vibration level at 49 Hz and 99 Hz. are the result of high pulsation
forces without resonance and must be resolved by compressor bottle
(re)sizing.
Problem
Failure in cooling pump discharge line (possibly vibration induced)
Steps to solution
No vibration measurements just visual observation
Identification of excitation mechanism thru fluid simulations (pump
trips & start-up and check valve closures)
Time history mechanical simulation to verify stress levels
Identification of source of vibration problem
Modification proposal
Alternating stress amplitude of 233 MPa results in stress range of 466 MPa
may be responsible for LCF
Problem
Excessive pressure in injection line.
Steps to solution
Assumed mechanism entrapped (undrained) fluid propelled by gas at
gas velocity during start-up hits valve that is cracked open
Identification of source of problem thru simulation
500
450
400
.
350
M a x im u m P re s s u re [B a rg ]
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Trapped gas volume [Liter at atmospheric pressure]
Copyright © 2007 by Dynaflow Engineering B.V. All rights reserved -66-
Conclusions for presentation