Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kriteria Penilaian Poster

    Uploaded by

    bintanglima
    58 views1 page
    This document outlines the criteria for evaluating posters in 5 areas: 1) Significance - relevance to clinical nutrition topics and ability to increase understanding of nutrition issues and solutions. 2) Originality - whether the content is original and identifies new problems or approaches. 3) Methods - whether the analysis design fits the research goals and content is clear and logical. 4) Visual presentation - whether the visual display is effective with balanced font/images and concise writing. 5) Question and answer evaluation - the presenter's understanding of the poster content and clinical implications as well as their discussion with viewers.

    Original Description:

    kriteria penilaian poster yg baik

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines the criteria for evaluating posters in 5 areas: 1) Significance - relevance to clinical nutrition topics and ability to increase understanding of nutrition issues and solutions. 2) Originality - whether the content is original and identifies new problems or approaches. 3) Methods - whether the analysis design fits the research goals and content is clear and logical. 4) Visual presentation - whether the visual display is effective with balanced font/images and concise writing. 5) Question and answer evaluation - the presenter's understanding of the poster content and clinical implications as well as their discussion with viewers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    58 views1 page

    Kriteria Penilaian Poster

    Uploaded by

    bintanglima
    This document outlines the criteria for evaluating posters in 5 areas: 1) Significance - relevance to clinical nutrition topics and ability to increase understanding of nutrition issues and solutions. 2) Originality - whether the content is original and identifies new problems or approaches. 3) Methods - whether the analysis design fits the research goals and content is clear and logical. 4) Visual presentation - whether the visual display is effective with balanced font/images and concise writing. 5) Question and answer evaluation - the presenter's understanding of the poster content and clinical implications as well as their discussion with viewers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Kriteria penilaian :

    1. SIGNIFIKANSI
    - Apakah isi poster memiliki relevansi dengan ilmu gizi klinik terutama yang terkait
    dengan tema SCNU?
    - Apakah isi poster dapat meningkatkan pemahaman tentang masalah gizi dan
    memberikan solusi tentang masalah yang diangkat?
    2. ORISINALITAS
    - Apakah isi poster orisinal?
    - Adakah problem baru yang teridentifikasi atau apakah isi poster memberikan
    pendekatan terbaru yang orisinal dalam memahami permasalahan yang sudah
    lama ada?
    3. METODE
    - Apakah desain analisis yang dipakai sesuai dengan tujuan penelitian?
    - Apakah isi poster disampaikan dengan jelas dan logis?
    4. PENILAIAN POSTER DARI SEGI VISUAL
    - Apakah tampilan poster efektif?
    harus ada keseimbangan antara proporsi huruf dan gambar. Kalimat harus singkat,
    padat dan tidak diperkenankan mencantumkan gambar yang tidak relevan.
    5. PENILAIAN HASIL TANYA JAWAB PENILAI DAN PRESENTAN SERTA
    PEMBACA POSTER
    - Seberapa dalam pemahaman presentan terhadap isi poster dan Implikasi klinis
    yang diharapkan?
    - Apakah selama kegiatan presentasi poster (bukan saat presentasi oral) presentan
    melakukan diskusi dengan pembaca poster?

    You might also like