Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Huawei Dualcell Hspa Technology White Paper: Doc. Code
Huawei Dualcell Hspa Technology White Paper: Doc. Code
code
Issue V1.0
Date 2011-05-30
and other Huawei trademarks are trademarks of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All other
trademarks and trade names mentioned in this document are the property of their respective
holders.
Notice
The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Every effort has been made in
the preparation of this document to ensure accuracy of the contents, but all statements, information,
and recommendations in this document do not constitute the warranty of any kind, express or
implied.
Huawei HSPA+ White Paper
Contents
6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 19
7 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................... 20
1 Executive Summary
In similarity with Long Term Evolution (LTE), the HSPA technology is also
influenced by the carrier aggregations. The performance and throughputs of
HSPA can also be improved by using multi-carrier bandwidth operations with or
without the adoption of multi transmission techniques. The end users’ throughputs
thus can be double or more as compared to single carrier HSPA. In addition, the
adoption of multi carriers in HSPA can bring similar peak throughput
performances as are achieved by MIMO techniques without changing the
hardware infrastructure of the network.
The first phase of multi-carrier HSPA based on 3GPP R8 standards uses two
consecutive carriers in the downlink to transmit data for one subscriber and
named as Dual Cell HSDPA (DC-HSDPA). The 3GPP R9 and beyond standards
specify the usage of more than two carriers for a single subscriber without the
restrictions of same frequency bands usage.
In 3GPPR8-based HSPA+, it is an optional choice for the operators to select
DC-HSDPA or MIMO. However, in later 3GPP standards the DC and MIMO
could be deployed together. In this paper, we will only focus on the DC-HSDPA
technology, its performance, deployment strategy and comparison with MIMO
according to the 3GPP R8 standards.
DC-HSDPA improves the end users’ throughput in the whole cell area even in the
cell edges and provides the quality of service for all users. Beside the bandwidth
cost, the evolution from the legacy HSPA to HSPA+ is easy and economical with
DC-HSDPA as compared to the network up-gradation by MIMO only. If
transceiver elements support multi carrier technology then no additional
hardware will be required for network up-gradation to DC-HSDPA.
2 DC-HSDPA Introduction
The use of multi carrier technology is defined by 3GPP Release 8 and further
improved in the later releases. The standard roadmap of multi carrier HSPA
technology is given in Figure 2-1. .
As a first step of multi carrier HSPA technology, Dual Cell HSDPA (DC-HSDPA)
is allowed for downlink only with some restrictions on carrier selection and
frequency band, or example:
1) The dual cell transmission will only apply to HSDPA physical channels
2) The two cells must belong to the same Node-B and are on adjacent carriers
3) The two cells shall not use MIMO to serve a single UE but two cells can be configured
as MIMO along with DC
4) The two cells must operate in the same frequency band
5) The UE will only communicate with one cell in the uplink
Through dual cell transmission and having double radio resource, DC-HSDPA is
able to provide higher data throughput to the end users and better results can be
obtained in the cell edges.
One of the two cells is treated as anchor (primary) cell and the other one as
supplementary (secondary) cell and both of them can be deployed with equivalent
and non-equivalent channel configuration.
Figure 2-3 – Equivalent and non- equivalent deployment of Primary and Secondary cells
In equivalent deployment, both the cells can work as anchor and supplementary
cells for the dedicated subscribers in the same coverage area. Few of the
subscribers will treat one cell as their anchor cell and rest of them will treat
second as their anchor cell. The selection of the anchor carrier is based on cell
load and operators Radio Barer (RB) strategy. The anchor carrier always
initializes the handover process of an end user and supplementary carrier is not
involved in handover process. In additions, both the cells will work as an
independent single cell source for the non-DC-HSDPA subscribers or legacy
HSDPA subscribers. In non-equivalent deployment, the supplementary cell is
configured with one HS-DSCH and a P-CPICH; in this case, the supplementary
cell cannot serve traditional HSDPA, HSUPA and R99 users in standalone
operations. In both equivalent and non-equivalent deployment, the legacy HSDPA
_________________________________________________________________
The implementations of DC-HSDPA along with 64QAM provide 42Mbps
theoretical DL peak throughput similar to 64QAM+MIMO based on 3GPP R8,
which is many times higher as compared to single cell HSDPA. Figure 2-4 shows
the peak data throughput comparison between single carrier and dual carrier for
16QAM and 64QAM modulated signals.
Figure 2-4 – Throughput comparison between single cell and dual cell HSDPA
The DC-HSDPA adopts carrier aggregation phenomena and use two 5 MHz carriers for a
single user’s data in the downlink. The Timing of the two cells remains the same and in
uplink, DC UE only connects to the anchor carrier. The ACK/NACK/CQI for second carriers
is Joint-encoded and reported by HS-DPCCH in anchor carrier. DC-HSDPA+MIMO is not
implemented within 3GPP R8 standards, but the sector can support DC and MIMO
simultaneously. The air interface architecture along with common requirements for
DC-HSDPA is given in Figure 3-1.
Both the network and user equipment require up-gradation for the implementation of
DC-HSDPA. The network need to support joint scheduling and the UE need to support two
transport channels and HARQ entities.
The main benefit of segmenting MAC-d PDU in NodeB is to enable the network to send user
data to more than one MAC-ehs PDU of different cells.
The DC-HSDPA requires MAC-ehs entity and one MAC-ehs support HS-DSCH transmission
in more than one cell served by the same NodeB. The scheduler decides the data transmission
on each HS-DSCH channel. Each of the HS-DSCH is served by the separate HARQ entities.
The detail description of NodeB logical architecture for DC-HSDPA is given in Figure 3-3.
HARQ entity
HARQ entity
After the joint scheduling of two cells, the single user data is sent on separate HS-DSCH
through separate HARQ, which improves the users’ throughput and increase user experience.
The DC-HSDPA UE has to support two HS-DSCH transport channel, each HS-DSCH will
served by one HARQ entity.
As the uplink, DC is not a part of in 3GPP R8 dual cell solution, so the uplink DCH/E-DCH
channels of DC-HSDPA are only carried on anchor carrier. Single cell UE monitors
HS-DPCCH uses a new frame format that enables it to carry CQI and HARQ ACK/NACK
information of two frequency cells in single TTI. In case, if the secondary frequency is not
activated for a user, the uplink feedback channel frame format and the information on
HS-DPCCH will be the same as in Release 5 HSDPA.
DC-HSDPA is an alternative of MIMO to improve the data throughput and users’ experience
in HSPA+ based on 3GPP R8 standard. The carrier aggregation process enables the increase
in capacity and user throughput.
Regardless of double frequency requirements, a number of benefits from DC-HSDPA
attracting the mobile operators to chose it as a key feature. The key benefits are improved
user experience, easy deployment and low network cost.
Figure 4-1 DC-HSDPA service coverage comparison with other HSPA users
DC-HSDPA is has best performance for the burst services like http, gaming or small size
download files. The burst services consume a small amount of resource and users’
transmission time is small, therefore; DC-HSDPA cells can easily share their resources to all
the subscribers. Multi-user response time is improved by 50% as compared to single carrier
for as long as the air interface is not congested.
Figure 4-2 – Response Gain Time of DC-HSDPA vs SC-HSDPA for Burst Services
However, on the other side, for the full buffer services like ftp files or heavy files where the
required data transmission is continuous and download time is long, the gain of DC-HSDPA
is impacted by the number of users. The gain in this condition will only improved from 10 to
20% of the single carrier if the number of subscribers reaches to 16 or more in a cell.
configurations in a same coverage area. For the areas where the cell is covered by one carrier
frequency only, there will be new requirement for another carrier and it will cost some extra
amount.
In overall, the cost of extra antenna system, new transceivers and deployment cost is saved
by upgrading the network to DC-HSDPA.
The up-gradation process is very smooth and the performance of non-DC users will not be
degraded after the up-gradation of cell to the DC-HSDPA. All the legacy UEs will provide
the similar throughput as before in the single cell and there will be no service degradation
effect.
Huawei is one of the key contributors in DC-HSDPA standard development and technology
maturity. Huawei has actively contributed in 3GGP standardization for Radio Resource
Control (RRC) Protocol specification, Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception,
User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception, Medium Access Control (MAC)
protocol specification, channels assignment and mapping, scheduling enhancement and so
on.
In addition to the standardization, Huawei has great contribution for the development of
network elements for the support and deployment of DC-HSDPA technology. The first
edition of Huawei dual cell technology is considered in RAN12 series release.
For the scheduling process, the criteria for the scheduling assignment are dependent on the
following two factors:
The power utilization of Carriers
SC HSDPA user number of Carriers
The user is assigned one of the scheduler of two cells in such a way that it would not impact
the performance and capacity of entire cell and other users. Following main advantages are
realized from the above algorithm settings:
Enhance the QoE, Reduce waiting time for the Delay-Sensitive Services and Guarantee
the BE users’ throughput
6 Conclusion