You are on page 1of 9

Dr.

Narendran’s Dilemma

Written Analysis and Communication - 1

To

Prof. Mukul Vasavada

Academic Associate: Amruta Dave

On

2nd July 2011

By

Indranil Hansda

Section – C
Letter of Transmittal

From

Indranil Hansda

To

Dr. Narendran

Indian Medical [Siddha] College

Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Date: 2nd July 2011

Subject: Patenting and commercialization of the Siddha formulae.

Dear Dr. Narendran,

I have looked into the different options available that will help to build the reputation of Indian

Medical College [IMC] and give recognition to the Siddha system of medicine among other

systems by patenting and commercializing the formula. As a first option you can file the patent

and sell it for a onetime fee, or second filing the patent a pharmaceutical company can be asked

to manufacture the formula and the marketing can be done by the Institute. Another option is

that after getting the patent an agreement is arranged with an entrepreneur who will produce

and sell the formula and give royalties to the Institute. After analyzing all these options I have

reached at the best option available. The report is enclosed.

Yours sincerely

Indranil Hansda
Executive Summary

Indian Medical [Siddha] College [IMC] has to take the decision that if it should file a patent and

commercialize the new formula that has been researched by a faculty member. The faculty

members at IMC are of the opinion that IMC should do such patents as it will help Siddha gain

some recognition in other systems of medicine.

The effects on profitability, reputation and recognition were analyzed and three options were

derived, amongst which it is recommended that IMC obtains the patent and then enter into a

contract with an entrepreneur who will manufacture and sell the formula and give royalties to

IMC.

[103 words]

1
Contents

Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………. 1

Situation Analysis………………………………………………………………………………. 3

The Dilemma/Problem…………………………………………………………………………. 4

The Options………………………………………………………………………………………4

Criteria for Evaluation………………………………………………………………………….. 4

Evaluation of Options…………………………………………………………………………... 4

Recommendation………………………………………………………………………………. 6

Action Plan……………………………………………………………………………………… 6

2
Situation Analysis

Dr. Narendran has to take a decision on the research done by one of his faculty members

Dr. Ramkumar, who despite being a good practitioner and researcher, is also a very secretive

and selfish individual and has proposed to patent and commercialize the formula. Dr. Narendran

on the other hand has never been concerned about the financial gains but has always given

priority to developing the Siddha system. Thus it seems that till now IMC has only thought about

the development of Siddha and never considered the possibility of patenting their discoveries.

IMC has been an Institute that has been working towards educating more people in the Siddha

system of medicine and is dedicated towards providing medical care to the patients. IMC is also

inclined towards the social cause of serving people to the extent that they provided free

treatment and diet to the patients admitted in the IPD. It has also conducted special OPD’s

during outbreaks of diseases. IMC is also very keen at researching various aspects of Siddha

and wants to promote and propagate the science.

The Head of Departments’ at the Institute have concluded that in order to promote and

propagate the Siddha system they need to validate the therapies and drugs used with

quantifiable evidence, so that the other systems of medicine would acknowledge their practices.

They have also shown a key interest in the patenting of new formulas as practiced by other

systems of medicine and also want to commercialize them. Dr. Ramkumar has approached with

his formula soon after these conclusions were made, although he had developed the formula

before joining IMC. However at this stage IMC does not have the expertise to file a patent or to

commercialize their product.

3
The Dilemma/Problem

Should Dr. Narendran go ahead with Dr. Ramkumar’s proposal and how should he

commercialize the formula.

The Options

 The patent is obtained and sold for a onetime fee.

 After obtaining patent IMC outsources the manufacturing of the formula to a pharmaceutical

company, but does the marketing by itself.

 IMC obtains the patent and enters into a contract with an entrepreneur who will pay royalties

on sales of the product.

Criteria for Evaluation

 Financial viability of commercializing the patent.

 IMC receives academic recognition.

 Siddha system gains recognition among parallel systems of medicine.

Evaluation of Options

Sell Patent for onetime fee

By obtaining the patent, IMC would be the first amongst the other three postgraduate Siddha

Institutes in the country to do so; thus it will gain a reputation for itself. This will also motivate the

faculty members who are conducting various researches in the institute, as it will also bring

4
recognition to the researcher. The Siddha system will also receive some amount of recognition

among other systems of medicine as this research has quantifiable preclinical [animal toxicity]

and clinical test results. By gaining this reputation and recognition it is possible that other

systems of medicine might refer their patients to IMC; moreover the ‘cost effective’ and ‘no

surgery required’ features of this formula should itself attract more patients; it will also

encourage students to pursue postgraduate education in the Siddha system. Thus filing the

patent should create more awareness about the Siddha system of medicine in the country.

By selling the patent for a onetime fee IMC can earn a minimum of Rs 50,000 or a maximum of

Rs 75,000 and will not have to do any other activity for commercialization and can concentrate

on providing medical service to its patients. However, it is not clear as to how much exposure

this formula will get to the other systems of medicine. Thus this option cannot be considered to

be the best.

Formulae is outsourced for manufacturing but marketed by IMC

The benefit of the patent has been mentioned earlier.

If IMC does the marketing themselves, then the exclusivity of the product will remain with the

Institute. According to the profit projection, IMC should make at least Rs 58,000 in 5 years and

probably it will also be able to gain some amount of exposure to the other systems, as it is said

that 10% of the sales will be from outside the system.

However, IMC will have to setup a marketing team for this purpose by hiring new people, as it

does not have anyone in the Institute with any prior experience of marketing. Thus it seems that

this option will require a lot of effort from IMC.

5
Entrepreneur sells formulae and IMC earns royalties

After getting the patent if IMC enters into a contract with an entrepreneur, then it has been

estimated that IMC will earn at least Rs 55,200 in 5 years and it is also estimated that 20% of

sales might come from other systems of medicine. In this arrangement IMC does not have to

put in much effort, but will earn considerable amount of money and Siddha will also gain

considerable exposure in the other systems of medicine, which will help to popularize Siddha as

a quantifiable practice of medicine. However, IMC will have to find for itself a trust worthy

partner for this venture, for which it will have to conduct back ground checks of the interested

parties and ask for references before entering into a contract. IMC could probably use the help

of the other Institutes in the State for this purpose. Thus it seems that this option is the most

workable amongst the other two.

The Recommendation

File the patent and enter into a contract with an entrepreneur who will pay royalties on sales of

the product.

Action Plan

 Hire a lawyer who will take care of the patenting process.

 The funds required for this purpose can be taken from the development funds for now,

which can later be reimbursed with the money earned by commercializing this patent.

 Issue a tender after the patent has been obtained, so as to enter into a contract with

interested entrepreneurs. By issuing a tender it is also possible for that IMC might be able

6
 to receive more than 6% as royalty, which will depend on the negotiations.

 Conduct a background check of the interested parties.

 Ask help from other Siddha Institutes if required, to find a suitable partner.

[1048 words]

You might also like