Scribd
Upload
235 views2 pages

Built-Up Column Design Analysis

This document summarizes the design of a built-up column using back-to-back single lacing. It shows that the column has an area of 9128 mm^2 which provides enough strength to support the required load of 1200 kN. It also checks that the effective slenderness ratio is less than 180, meaning the column meets buckling requirements. The calculated compressive strength of the concrete is also sufficient at 180 MPa.

Uploaded by

Anand
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
235 views2 pages

Built-Up Column Design Analysis

This document summarizes the design of a built-up column using back-to-back single lacing. It shows that the column has an area of 9128 mm^2 which provides enough strength to support the required load of 1200 kN. It also checks that the effective slenderness ratio is less than 180, meaning the column meets buckling requirements. The calculated compressive strength of the concrete is also sufficient at 180 MPa.

Uploaded by

Anand
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Section Properties and Design Case: Introduces the design of built-up columns including section properties and a specific case study with back-to-back and single lacing analysis.
  • Additional Calculations: Presents further calculations related to the design case, possibly continuing from the previous page's analysis.

Built - Up Column Design("Effectiveness of Various Built-up Columns")

Section Properties
Section ISMC300 Given Values Case 1: Back-to-Back, Single Lacing
A, mm2 4564 Pu, N 1200000 N 1. Area Req. 8000
h, mm 300 fcd, assumed 150
b, mm 90 K 0.65 2. Area Prov. 9128
tf, mm 13.6 L 9000
tw, mm 7.6 3. Buckling Class c
Izz, mm4 63626000 4.
Iyy, mm4 3108000 (KL/r)_eff=1.05(KL/r_z ) 52.01 < 180
rz, mm 118.1 OK
ry, mm 26.1
g, mm 50 5. fcd, calculated 180
Cyy, mm 23.6
6. Pd 1643.04 > 1200 kN
Section Selection OK.

Spacing of Channels S
2I_z=2(I_y+A(S/2+C_yy )" " ^2⇒S=(√((I_z−I_y)/𝐴)
−C_yy )×2
t-up Columns")

183.10
√((I_z−I_y)/𝐴)

You might also like