Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0308-8146(18)30998-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.026
Reference: FOCH 22987
Please cite this article as: Pęksa, A., Miedzianka, J., Nemś, A., Amino acid composition of flesh-coloured potatoes
as affected by storage conditions, Food Chemistry (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.026
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Amino acid composition of flesh-coloured potatoes as affected by storage conditions
Department of Food Storage and Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science,
Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life
Sciences, Poland
Email: joanna.miedzianka@upwr.edu.pl
Abstract
The study determined nitrogen compounds and amino acid profile in dry matter of potatoes
differing in flesh colour, stored at 2 °C and 5 °C for three and six months. With increased storage
time, the total protein content and particularly amino acid content declined. The coagulable protein
content increased at three months’ storage by 25%. The majority of the amino acid content
decreased from 19 to 6% and from 38 to 21% after three and six months’ storage, respectively.
Storage temperature did not influence the coagulable protein content or serine, glycine, cysteine,
tyrosine and phenylalanine. However, potatoes stored at 2 ºC contained slightly more amino acids
than tubers stored at 5 ºC. Independently of the storage conditions, potatoes of yellow-fleshed
Fresco and red-fleshed Herbie 26 varieties were characterised by a relatively high nutritive value,
limited by leucine (CS = 84), methionine plus cysteine (CS = 78) and leucine (CS = 72),
respectively.
Potatoes are very popular as an inexpensive food product, available throughout the year due to
their suitability for long-term storage. These vegetables are a valued raw material in starch and
alcohol manufacture, for instance, and a valuable consumer product, mainly for their versatility of
usage and favourable sensory and nutritional properties. Moreover, potatoes outperform other
products, such as wheat, rice or corn, in terms of nutritional value, cost of cultivation and storage
An increasing number of studies have described potato varieties with coloured flesh, notably
purple and red. Despite similarities in chemical composition to traditional, yellow, creamy or white
varieties (Jansen & Flamme, 2006; Lachman et al., 2012; Pęksa et al., 2013), coloured-fleshed
potatoes contain anthocyanins, polyphenolic compounds with beneficial effects on human health.
Tubers with purple or red flesh can be a profitable source of anthocyanins, similar to cranberries
and superior to red cabbage. These compounds, besides displaying antioxidant properties, exhibit
the activity in reducing the risk of chronic diseases of the nervous system; furthermore, they give
tubers interesting functions not found in potatoes of traditional light colour. Potatoes with coloured
flesh are similar to traditional fleshed tubers in terms of the content of nitrogen compounds (Jansen
& Flamme, 2006). However, as has been shown in previous work (Pęksa et al., 2013), leucine is the
amino acid limiting the quality of protein contained in purple- and red-fleshed varieties, whereas, in
yellow-fleshed cultivars, it is primarily the sulfur amino acids, methionine and cysteine.
Coloured-flesh potatoes cultivars allow long-term storage without notable loss of anthocyanins
and belong to the so-called low-cost crops; their production and storage are well established.
compared to yellow- and cream-fleshed varieties (Tajner-Czopek, Rytel, Kita, Pęksa, & Hamouz,
2012).
Regardless of flesh colour, potatoes contain protein of high nutritive value which consists of
two main fractions: coagulable protein (nitrogen compounds precipitable with trichloroacetic acid)
and non-protein organic compounds, such as free amino acids. This coagulable protein is a valuable
foodstuff because of its well-balanced amino acid composition (van Gelder & Vonk, 1980). Potato
protein is of great biological and nutritional value, comparable with egg white, and its chemical
score (CS) ranges from 57 to 69 (Kapoor, Desbrough, & Li, 1975; Mitrus, Stankiewicz, Steć,
Kamecki, & Starczewski, 2003; Pęksa, 2003; Pęksa, Rytel, Kita, Lisińska, & Tajner-Czopek, 2009).
Potatoes contain significant amounts of aspartic and glutamic acids and their amides, as well as
essential amino acids (EAAs) like leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, valine and tyrosine (Burton, 1989;
Zimnoch-Guzowska & Flis, 2006; Pranaitiene, Danilcenko, Jariene, & Dabkevicius, 2008).
About 50% of the total nitrogen presented in potatoes is derived from proteins (Eppendorfer,
Eggum, & Bille, 1979; Kapoor et al., 1975); around 40% of the remaining soluble non-protein
nitrogen consists of the above-mentioned free amino acids and their amides, while 10% comprises
non-protein nitrogen associated with glycoalkaloids, some vitamins, purines, pyrimidines and
secondary metabolites (Friedman, 1996). About 35% of the soluble protein is glycoprotein of 44–45
kDa molecular weight, known as patatin or tuberin, 25% of the protein includes protease inhibitors,
and the remaining 40% contains other proteins with different properties (Deveaux-Gobert, 2008;
Apart from their nutritional functions, amino compounds, such as amino acids, peptides and
proteins, exhibit antioxidant activity and thus are considered important in plants and animals.
Antioxidant amino acids include methionine, cysteine, tryptophan, tyrosine, histidine, lysine and
proline.
Storage of potatoes is aimed at extending the shelf-life while minimising quantitative and
qualitative losses. The suitability of potatoes for long-term storage is associated with the genetic
properties of the variety, which can be changed under the influence of the growing conditions and
storage. Storage stability of varieties depends on the resting period of the tubers, the intensity of life
processes occurring in the tubers, and the resistance to mechanical damage and susceptibility of
tubers to fungal and bacterial diseases during vegetation and storage (Kołodziejczyk, 2016). During
storage, the chemical composition of potatoes is changed, mainly by the temperature. At increased
storage temperature, respiration, transpiration and germ growth intensify, causing apparent
increases in the dry matter (DM) content and loss of reducing sugars and starch. Most potato
varieties exhibit low life activity when stored at 4–6 ºC. Table potatoes are usually stored at about
4ºC, which extends the period of dormancy, reduces the intensity of the growth of germs, stabilises
the DM content of tubers and lowers the natural losses, also limiting the development of the
majority of storage diseases (Czerko, Zgórska, & Grudzińska, 2012). However, this leads to the
accumulation of reducing sugars, along with protein degradation, which is consistent with an
& Cobb, 1996). Both of these processes may act as determinants of potato processing quality. The
research of various authors shows that long-term storage results in a decrease of the content of most
amino acids and a similar downward trend can be seen in total protein (Brierley et al., 1996; Černá
& Kráčmar, 2010). In these studies, it is also pointed out that amino acid composition of potatoes
during long-term storage, usually, in low temperature conditions, depends primarily on the time of
The content and structure of nitrogen compounds is modified in yellow-fleshed varieties during
long-term storage of potato tubers (Galdón, Mesa, Rodriquez, & Romero, 2010; Jansen & Flamme,
2006; Rexen, 1976), while potatoes with a coloured flesh in this regard are proportionally less
tested. There is no information in published literature about the impact of the presence of
anthocyanins in potato tubers on the variations in the content and composition of nitrogen
compounds in potatoes during storage. It is worth learning the factors influencing the
transformation of nitrogen compounds in potato varieties with red and purple flesh as affecting their
nutritional value, both due to the growing interest of consumers and potato producers, but also due
to the extensive research on varieties with coloured flesh in terms of their traits as raw materials in
the food industry and dietetic food. The aim of this study was to investigate the magnitude and
direction of changes in the content of nitrogen compounds in total, protein nitrogen, and amino
acids, and thus the nutritional value of potatoes differing in varietal characteristics, including the
colour of flesh, originating from different growing conditions, during long-term storage at low
temperature.
Six varieties of potato cultivated in the year 2014 were studied, including purple-fleshed
(Herbie 26 and Rote Emma), red-fleshed (Blaue Annelise and Blue Congo) and traditional yellow-
fleshed (Vineta and Fresco). The coloured-fleshed potatoes were grown in the test field at the
station of The Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture at Přerov nad Labem (the
Czech Republic) and potatoes of the traditional yellow-fleshed varieties of Vineta and Fresco were
obtained from a potato producing plant in Lower Silesia in Poland. The samples of potato tubers
were harvested after reaching full maturity. Average laboratory samples of 20 kg tubers of each
colour-fleshed variety were selected randomly from the collected field samples (40-50 kg).
Mechanically damaged and green potatoes were rejected. Thereafter, the 20 kg samples of tubers of
each variety were divided into two repetitions. Each sample of 10–15 tubers (weighing
approximately 1.5 kg) was stored concurrently in paper bags for zero (at start of storage), three and
six months at two low temperatures (2 ºC and 5 ºC), exposed to the air, at constant relative humidity
(85% ±2%; thermohydrometer TH-130; Hama, Mannheim, Germany). After each storage period,
the potatoes were analysed. Prepared material was stabilised by lyophilisation and stored below ‒18
The DM, starch, and total and coagulable nitrogen content were evaluated according to the
Association of Analytical Chemists’ method (AOAC, 1995). Protein content was calculated using a
aqueous acetone, as described by Nemś et al. (2015). Total polyphenol content was determined
using the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method, as described by Gao, Bjork, Trajovski, & Uggla
(2000). Polyphenol content, expressed as milligrams gallic acid equivalent (GAE), was calculated
Freeze-dried samples, milled and sieved, were used for amino acid determination. The amino
acid composition was determined by ion-exchange chromatography after 23 hours’ hydrolysis with
6 N HCl at 110 °C. After cooling, filtering and washing, the hydrolyte was evaporated in a vacuum
evaporator at a temperature below 50 °C. The dry residue was dissolved in a buffer of pH 2.2. The
prepared sample was analysed using the ninhydrin method (Simpson, Neuberger, & Lin, 1976;
Spackman, Stein, & Moore, 1958). The pH 2.6, 3.0, 4.25, and 7.9 buffers were applied. The
ninhydrin solution was buffered at pH 5.5. The hydrolysed amino acids were determined using an
AAA-400 analyser (INGOS, Prague, Czech Republic). A photometric detector was used, working at
two wavelengths, 440 nm and 570 nm. A column of 350 × 3.7 mm, packed with ion exchanger
Ostion LG ANB (INGOS) was utilised. Column temperature was kept at 60–74°C and detector at
121 °C. The calculations were carried out relative to an external standard. No analysis of tryptophan
was carried out. During the 23 hours’ acid hydrolysis at 110 °C, Trp, Asn and Gln are totally lost
(Asn and Gln turn to Asp and Glu, respectively). The losses of Cys, Met, Thr, Ser and Tyr reach up
to 15%.
The amino acid content in potatoes was calculated on a dry weight (DW) basis and the
composition of amino acids expressed on the nitrogen basis (g per 16 g N). Moreover, it was
necessary to compare the amino acid composition of the coloured-flesh potatoes to a reference
protein. The amino acid pattern for high-quality protein established by the Joint Food and
acid composition of the chemical scores (CS), according to the Mitchell and Block method
(Osborne & Voogt, 1978) and the integrated EAA index (Oser, 1951).
All data were statistically analysed using Statistica 10.0 (Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK).
Homogenous groups and least significant difference (LSD) values were denoted using Duncan’s
multiple comparison test. The significance level was set at α = 0.05, with one-way analysis of
The analysed coloured potato varieties were characterised by different DM, nitrogen and total
polyphenol contents (Table 1). The total and coagulable protein content in the potatoes depended on
the variety, not on the flesh colour. Purple-fleshed Blue Congo and red-fleshed Rote Emma
contained a greater total protein content than the potatoes of other varieties studied (2.87 g and 2.63
g 100 g‒1 fresh weight (FW), respectively). The lowest content of total protein was noted in tubers
of purple-fleshed Blaue Annelise and yellow-fleshed Fresco (2.01 g and 2.16 g 100 g‒1 FW,
respectively). There were comparatively smaller differences among the studied samples of potatoes
in respect of coagulable protein content. Potatoes of purple-fleshed Blaue Annelise and Blue
Congo, red-fleshed Rote Emma and yellow-fleshed Vineta varieties had similar coagulable protein
levels (from 0.55 g to 0.60 g 100 g‒1 FW). In contrast, the amount of coagulable protein was
significantly higher in red-fleshed Herbie 26 (0.70 g 100 g‒1 FW) and lowest in tubers of the
Jansen & Flamme (2006) studied 18 potato varieties/breeding clones of white- and purple-
fleshed cultivars and reported no distinct differences concerning DM, starch and protein content,
with comparable values to traditional white- or yellow-fleshed varieties. The total protein content is
said to depend mainly on the potato variety and fertilisation (Leszczyński, 2002; Mazur & Kreft,
Purple-fleshed Blaue Annelise and Blue Congo varieties presented the highest content of total
polyphenols (2.50 mg and 1.84 mg g‒1 DM, respectively), whereas the lowest content was observed
in Fresco tubers (0.58 mg g‒1 DM). Potato varieties with coloured flesh contain more polyphenolic
compounds, including anthocyanins, which are not found in yellow- or cream-fleshed varieties.
According to Brown (2005), purple- and red-fleshed potato varieties contain at least twice the levels
Both the variety and the storage conditions affected the protein and amino acid content of the
analysed tubers of different flesh colours (Table 2). However, the biggest differences in the content
of these compounds were observed among samples stored for different times and among different
potato varieties, independently of flesh colour. There was no influence of storage temperature on
the coagulable protein contents of the evaluated tubers. The studies showed that as the storage time
increased, the total protein content (DM basis), the sum of all amino acid contents and that of all
EAA contents declined. The loss of nitrogen compounds at three months’ storage amounted to
about 6.4%, but at six months increased to 19% on average compared to the potato tubers before
storage. The coagulable protein content (DM basis) of the analysed potatoes increased at three
months storage by an average 25% that was maintained (3.61 g 100 g‒1 DW) at six months.
Decreasing the total protein content but increasing the coagulable protein content at three months’
storage can be explained by the synthesis of proteins occurring especially in the first months of
tuber storage (Brierley et al., 1996). On the other hand, increasing the total nitrogen and decreasing
the coagulable protein content at six months’ storage was a result of protein hydrolysis, as the
protein degradation is associated with the end of tuber dormancy and the mobilization of nitrogen
reserves for sprout formation, while the breakdown of proteins is consistent with an increase in
storage, it remained at 9.27 g 100 g‒1 DW, constituting 92% of the original amount. However, at six
months’ storage, this had decreased relative to the initial value by, on average, 28%, with a
maximum 7.29 g 100 g‒1 DW detected (Table 2). The total content of EAAs decreased, on average,
by 30% at six months relative to the samples before storage. Some previous authors (Brierley et al.,
1996; Stankiewicz et al., 2008) documented that a decrease in the content of amino acids in the DM
of tubers under the influence of storage time was strictly connected to the accompanying decline in
the total protein content. Additionally, an increase in total nitrogen concentration (DM basis) has
been correlated with a reduction in the EAA content of the total protein (Danilchenko, Pranaitiene,
Tarasieviciene, & Venskutoniene, 2008; Mitrus et al., 2003; Pęksa et al., 2013) and depends
Moreover, from the results presented in Table 2, tubers of individual varieties differed
significantly in their content of nitrogen compounds, including total and coagulable protein, as well
as the sum of all and EAAs indices. Among all six potato varieties assessed, red-fleshed Herbie 26
and Rote Emma and yellow-fleshed Fresco tubers were characterised by higher total protein and
sum of all amino acids (DM basis) after six months’ storage, whereas purple-fleshed Blaue
Annelise variety had the lowest quantities of these compounds. Less diversity among samples of the
analysed tubers was evident regarding the coagulable protein content (DM basis), which ranged
from 3.04 g to 3.70 g 100 g‒1 DW. Galdón et al. (2010) observed relatively high variation in the
amino acid data for all the potato cultivars grown in the Canary Islands. Thus, the genetic
characteristics of the potato varieties decisively influenced the amino acid profile.
The data did not indicate a significant influence of storage temperature on the content of almost
all the determined amino acids. Potatoes stored at 2 ºC contained (DW basis) slightly more amino
acids, mainly asparagine, glutamine, proline, leucine, lysine and arginine, than tubers stored at 5 ºC.
However, there was a statistically significant difference for the amino acids valine and isoleucine.
The tuber storage temperature did not impact on the serine, glycine, cysteine, tyrosine and
phenylalanine content. Likewise, Talley, Toma, and Orr (1984) stated that observed differences in
the content of particular amino acids in potatoes stored at different temperatures (3.3 °C and 7.2 °C)
were not significant. Moreover, these authors did not find significant differences for methionine,
isoleucine and tyrosine content. However, content of asparagine, threonine, serine, proline, glycine,
valine, leucine, phenylalanine, histidine, lysine, arginine and tryptophan increased during storage at
Throughout the six months’ storage, losses were observed in the majority of the potato amino
acids (DM basis) (Table 2), both EAAs and non-essential amino acids (NEAAs). The storage time
influenced the content of the individual amino acids more than the storage temperature, the
differences at six months’ storage amounting to 21–38% relative to non-stored tubers. Furthermore,
an increase (33%) in proline content occurred at three months’ storage. The storage time most
affected the content of threonine, valine, arginine, leucine, histidine, lysine, isoleucine and
asparagine. At three months’ storage, the examined tubers contained 6–18% less threonine, valine,
methionine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine and lysine (EAAs) and, among the NEAAs, there were
smaller amounts of asparagine, serine, glutamine, histidine and arginine. Losses of the remaining
amino acids in the first period of storage were smaller than 16%. At six months’ storage of tubers of
coloured flesh varieties, the content of individual amino acids (DM basis) decreased from 38% to
21% compared to the samples before storage. The smaller losses were observed for serine,
glutamine, asparagine NEAAs and tyrosine or isoleucine EAAs; higher declines were noted for
lysine, valine, leucine, threonine, histidine and arginine content. The amino acids content (DM
basis) of tubers during long-term storage decreased along with the total nitrogen content. This
relationship concurs with Eppendorfer and Eggum (1994), who assessed the quality of potatoes with
traditional light-coloured flesh. The authors stated a close association between nitrogen content and
the concentration (DM basis) of methionine, cysteine, threonine and lysine. According to Talley et
al. (1984), the concentration of individual amino acids typically followed the same order as the
nitrogen content. However, in many instances where the order was not followed, the values were
not significantly different. Stankiewicz et al. (2008) found that at seven months’ storage of Irga and
There was significant differentiation among the contents of particular amino acids depending on
the potato variety (Table 2). Yellow-fleshed Fresco potatoes contained more EAAs, such as
threonine, methionine, tyrosine and phenylalanine, while among the NEAAs, asparagine, serine and
proline contents were notably higher than in the other analysed tubers. The lowest values of amino
acids, such as threonine, valine, lysine, asparagine and arginine, were found in purple-fleshed Blaue
Annelise potatoes. Significant amounts of most amino acids were detected in potatoes of Rote
The content of total protein (DM basis) of analysed tubers of Blaue Annelise, Blue Congo, Rote
Emma, Vineta and Fresco varieties decreased during the six months’ storage, whereas in Herbie 26
no significant changes in the total nitrogen compounds occurred (Table 3). In potatoes of Blue
Congo, Rote Emma and Vineta varieties, differing in flesh colour, decreasing total protein content
was found at both three months’ and six months’ storage. Conversely, a significant decrease in total
protein content was noticed only at three months’ storage in Fresco variety and six months’ storage
in Blaue Annelise tubers. The highest loss of total nitrogen compounds at six months’ storage was
found in the yellow-fleshed Vineta variety, which reached 38%; the smallest losses (average 1–8%)
The content of coagulable protein (DM basis) of the potato tubers significantly increased at
three months’ storage, and changed slightly or plateaued during the next three months of storage
(Table 3). The proportion of coagulable protein (DM basis) increased maximally in the Fresco
variety (by about 42%) and minimally in Herbie 26 tubers (by about 6%).
The presented studies showed that storage for six months contributed to a gradual decrease in
the total amino acids (DM basis) of almost all potato samples, regardless of flesh colour (Table 2),
and ranged from 22% to 40%. Only red-fleshed Herbie 26 variety, characterised by an insignificant
increase in the total amino acids content at three months’ storage and at six months, retained the
same value as that of the respective tubers before storage. Černá and Kráčmar (2010) determined
that the total quantity of amino acids in potatoes decreased by around 9% to 28% at 16 weeks’
There was observed an increase in dry matter content of most analysed potatoes. However, dry
matter of Blue Congo and Herbie 26 did not change significantly during storage. The increase of
dry matter content probably was the result of excessive evaporation of water from tubers stored in a
Potato protein is characterised by a high biological value, which is a measure of the proportion
of protein from a specific food that can be utilised to synthesise the proteins of the organism. The
nutritional value of proteins can be expressed by determining various indicators; for example, the
essential amino acids index (EAAI) and the CS. The CS is a comparison of each EAA in a specific
protein to the content of a standard protein, typically whole egg. The limiting EAA in the test
protein is expressed as the percentage of the amount of the same amino acid in the reference
protein. The CS of the EAAs and the EAAI were calculated with respect to the reference protein of
the joint FAO/WHO (1991), taking into account all EAAs besides tryptophan, the storage
The storage temperature of the six potato tubers of coloured flesh varieties did not significantly
influence the nutritional value of the protein, expressed as CS and EAAI (Table 4). In samples
stored at 2 °C, the average CS was 74 and was identical for sulfur amino acids and leucine. The
second limiting amino acid was threonine (CS = 85). In potatoes stored at 5 °C, the CS was 69–70
The storage time significantly affected the nutritive value of the studied samples of differing
flesh colour varieties (Table 4). The studies showed that the nutritional value indices of the protein
contained in potatoes, both CS and EAAI, decreased at three and six months’ storage. Only the CS
values of amino acids valine, phenylalanine and tyrosine, and isoleucine changed, but only slightly,
maintaining high levels. Similarly, Galdón et al. (2010) established the CS of all amino acids with
respect to the reference protein of the joint FAO/WHO (1991) calculated for each cultivar and
stated that the highest CS values were determined for aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine with
tyrosine) and for branched amino acids, like isoleucine, leucine and valine.
Before storage, the protein of the assessed potato samples characterised by CS, ranged from 84
to 156, whereas EAAI averaged 112. The limiting amino acids, before beginning the experiment,
were leucine (CS = 84) and methionine + cysteine (CS = 92). At three months’ storage, the CS
values ranged from 67 (for sulfur amino acids) to 147 (for aromatic amino acids). Extending the
storage time to six months contributed to further lowering the nutritional value of the protein
contained in the analysed tubers of the six potato varieties. This behaviour was reflected in the
EAAI, which decreased by over 30% relative to the EAAI of the potatoes before storage. The CS
(55 and 65 for sulfur amino acids and leucine, respectively) also limited the potato quality.
The analysed potato tubers of the different coloured flesh varieties showed significant
differentiation in terms of the nutritional value of the protein contained regardless of storage
conditions (Table 3). On average, Fresco, Rote Emma and Herbie 26 varieties were characterised by
the highest EAAI of protein, with values of 118, 110 and 96, respectively; leucine (CS = 84),
methionine + cysteine (CS = 78), and leucine (CS = 72) were the amino acids limiting the protein
The nutritional value of the potato varieties, expressed as CS relative to the referenced standard
protein (FAO/WHO, 1991), changed depending on the storage time and variety (Figure 1). Before
storage, the yellow-fleshed Fresco potatoes contained full-valued protein (CS = 142), which
contrasted with the tubers of the other varieties, wherein the amino acid limiting the protein quality
was leucine, and CS, which ranged between 67 and 85. Our results corroborate the data published
by Eppendorfer and Eggum (1994), who found that methionine + cysteine and leucine were the
most limiting amino acids in the studied potato tubers. Conversely, Sotelo, Contreras, Soussa, and
Hernández (1998) reported that the sulfur amino acids were the limiting amino acids in all
The nutritional value of protein contained in potatoes of the evaluated varieties decreased
during storage, depending on the variety. This was particularly the case for purple-fleshed Blue
Congo and yellow-fleshed Fresco potatoes at six months’ storage, and for Blaue Annelise at three
months’ storage (Figure 1). At three months’ storage, the CS of the protein nutritional value
decreased in these varieties by, on average, over 30%; in tubers of the Blue Congo and Fresco
varieties, it decreased by a further 12–18% at six months. Leucine was the amino acid limiting the
quality of protein of stored potatoes of the Fresco variety (CS range 69–57). Conversely, Blue
Congo was limited by methionine + cysteine (CS range 49–43), while the quality of Blaue Annelise
protein was limited by methionine + cysteine at three months’ storage (CS = 54) and threonine at
six months (CS = 70). Relatively small changes in the nutritional value at six months’ storage in
comparison to their non-stored counterparts were observed for the protein of red-fleshed Herbie 26
and yellow-fleshed Vineta varieties. The nutritional value of protein of these potatoes, expressed as
CS, maintained a similar level to the samples before storage. At three months’ storage, the limiting
amino acids were, proportionally, leucine (CS = 58) and methionine + cysteine (CS = 59); at six
months, these were methionine + cysteine (CS = 65) and leucine (CS = 71).
At six months’ storage, the CS of all analysed varieties was 43–71. However, the protein of
Vineta and Blaue Annelise tubers presented the highest nutritional value, despite containing less
total nitrogen compounds than the other tubers. The data are consistent with van Gelder and Vonk
(1980), who studied the amino acid composition of the protein of 34 potato varieties and stated that
the slight variation in the amino composition of coagulable protein hardly affects the EAAI.
Additionally, the amino acid composition of coagulable potato protein was largely the same in
varieties with low and high protein content. Similar findings were also confirmed by our previous
research (Pęksa et al., 2013) and by other authors (Eppendorfer & Eggum, 1994; Rexen, 1976).
4. Conclusion
The presented study found that during storage of the six potato samples of varieties with
different coloured flesh (DM basis), the nitrogen compounds decreased, along with the amino acid
content (except proline). However, an increase in the coagulable protein content occurred, to the
greatest extent in tubers of the yellow-fleshed Fresco variety (by about 42%) and to the least extent
in the DM of red-fleshed Herbie 26 tubers (by about 6%). The storage temperature did not
significantly influence the coagulable protein content and only insignificantly affected some of the
amino acid content: samples stored at a lower temperature (2 ºC versus 5 ºC) contained less valine
and isoleucine, for instance. The storage time mostly impacted the content of amino acids, such as
threonine, valine, arginine, leucine, histidine, lysine, isoleucine and asparagine. Among the samples
of tubers of the six potato varieties, there was lower diversity regarding the coagulable protein (DM
basis) than the total protein and the sum of all amino acid content. The highest losses of total
nitrogen compounds, following six months’ storage, were found in yellow-fleshed potatoes of the
Vineta variety, which reached 38%; in tubers of red-fleshed Herbie 26 and yellow-fleshed Fresco
The increase in the coagulable protein content (DM basis) of potatoes during long-term storage
did not impact its increased quality, as confirmed by the decreasing values of the nutritional value
indicators (EAAI, CS) determined at three and six months of storage, independently of potato
variety and flesh colour. Before storage, the limiting amino acid was leucine (CS = 84), but at three
and six months’ storage, it was the sulfur amino acids, with CS values of 67 and 55, respectively.
After storage at 2 ºC and 5 ºC, leucine and sulfur amino acids limited the protein quality of the
studied potatoes. In samples stored at 2 ºC, the average CS was 74; in potatoes stored at 5 ºC, it was
69–70. After six months of storage, the CS of all analysed varieties ranged between 43 and 71.
However, the proteins of Vineta and Blaue Annelise were characterised by the highest nutritional
value, despite containing fewer total nitrogen compounds than the other tubers.
Acknowledgements
This project was financed by the National Science Centre, granted on the basis of decision
DEC-2013/11/N/NZ9/00117.
This publication was supported by the Wroclaw Centre for Biotechnology programme at the
References
AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analytical chemist. Washington, DC: Association of Official
Analytical Chemists.
Brierley, E. R., Bonner, P. L. R., & Cobb, A. H. (1996). Factors influencing the free amino acid
content of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) tubers during prolonged storage. Journal of the
Brown, C. R. (2005). Antioxidants in potato. American Journal of Potato Research, 82(2), 163–
172.
Burton, W. G. (1989). The potato. New York, NY: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Černá, M., & Kráčmar, S. (2010). The effect of storage on the amino acids composition in potato
Czerko, Z., Zgórska, K., & Grudzińska, M. (2012). Porównanie odmian ziemniaka pod względem
121–130.
Danilchenko, H., Pranaitiene, R., Tarasieviciene, Z., & Venskutoniene, E. (2008). The effect of
inhibitors on the amino acid content in the stored potato tubers. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów
Eppendorfer, W. H., & Eggum, B. O. (1994). Effects of sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium,
and water stress on dietary fibre fractions, starch, amino acids and on the biological value of
Eppendorfer, W. H., Eggum, B. O., & Bille, S. W. (1979). Nutritive value of potato crude protein as
influenced by manuring and amino acid composition. Journal of the Science and Food
FAO/WHO. (1991). Protein quality evaluation. Report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation.
FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 51. Rome, Italy: World Health Organization.
Friedman, M. (1996). Nutritional value of proteins from different food sources. A review. Journal
Galdón, B. R., Mesa, D. R., Rodriquez, E. M. R., & Romero, C. D. (2010). Amino acid content in
traditional potato cultivars from the Canary Islands. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,
23, 148–153.
Gao, X., Björk, L., Trajkovski, V., & Uggla, M. (2000). Evaluation of antioxidant activities of
rosehip ethanol extracts in different test systems. Journal of the Science of Food and
Jansen, G., & Flamme, W. (2006). Coloured potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.)—anthocyanin
content and tuber quality. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53, 1321–1331.
Kapoor, A. C., Desborough, S. L., & Li, P. H. (1975). Potato tuber proteins and their nutritional
Kołodziejczyk, M. (2016). Effect of nitrogen fertilisation and microbial preparations on quality and
J. (2012). Impact of selected factors: Cultivar, storage, cooking and baking on the content of
pestycydów (The dependence of potato quality on fertilizer and pesticide cultivation). Zeszyty
Lister, C. E., & Munro, J. (2000). Nutrition and health qualities of potatoes— a future focus. In
Crop & Food Research Confidential Report No. 143 (pp. 1–53). Christchurch, New Zealand:
New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited Provate Bag 4704.
Mazur, T., & Kreft, L. (1983). Zawartość związków azotowych w bulwach pięciu odmian
compounds in tubers of five potato varieties depending on nitrogen fertilisation in the Olsztyn
Mitrus, J., Stankiewicz, C., Steć, E., Kamecki, M., & Starczewski, J. (2003). The influence of
selected cultivation on the content of total protein and amino acids in the potato tubers. Plant
Nemś, A., Pęksa, A., Kucharska, A.Z., Sokół-Łętowska, A., Kita, A., Drożdż, W., & Hamouz, K.
(2015). Anthocyanin and antioxidant activity of snacks with coloured potato. Food Chemistry,
172, 175–182.
Osborne, B. L., & Voogt, P. (1978). The analysis of nutrients in food. London: Academic Press.
Oser, B. L. (1951). Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation
Pęksa, A. (2003). Białko ziemniaczane charakterystyka właściwości (Potato protein, the profile of
Pęksa, A., Kita, A., Kułakowska, K., Aniołowska, M., Hamouz, K., & Nemś, A. (2013). The quality
protein. In: Potato: Food, nutrition and health (pp. 79–87). Japan: Global Science Books, Food
Pranaitiene, R., Danilcenko, H., Jariene, E., & Dabkevicius, Z. (2008). The effect of inhibitors on
the changes of potato tuber quality during the storage period. Journal of Food, Agriculture and
Environment, 6, 231–235.
Simpson, R. J., Neuberger, M. R., & Lin, T. Y. (1976). Complete amino acid analysis of proteins
Sotelo, A., Contreras, E., Soussa, H., & Hernández, V. (1998). Nutrient composition and toxic
factor content of four wild species of Mexican potato. Journal of Agriculture and Food
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H., & Moore, S. (1958). Automatic recording apparatus for use in the
Stankiewicz, C., Bombik, A., Rymsza, K., & Starczewski, J. (2008). An impact of selected
agrotechnological operations on protein and exogenous amino acid content in potato tubers of
Irga and Ekra cultivars during their storage (in Polish). Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk
Tajner-Czopek, A., Rytel, E., Kita, A., Pęksa, A., & Hamouz, K. (2012). The influence of thermal
process of coloured potatoes on the content of glycoalkaloids in the potato products. Food
Talley, E. A., Toma, R. B., & Orr, P. H. (1984). Amino acid composition of freshly harvested and
van Gelder, W. M. J., & Vonk, C. R. (1980). Amino acid composition of coagulable protein from
tubers of 34 potato varieties and its relationship with protein content. Potato Research, 23, 427–
434.
Young, V. R., & Pellett, P. L. (1991). Protein evaluation, amino acid scoring and the food and drug
administration’s proposed food labeling regulations. Issues and opinions in nutrition. Journal of
Zimnoch-Guzowska, E., & Flis, B. (2006). Genetyczne podstawy cech jakościowych ziemniaka
(Genetic basis of potato quality traits). Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 511,
23–36.
0-month
120
100 F
BA RE
80
H26 BC
60
V
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Total protein (g·100g-1 DW)
3-month
120
100
RE
80 F
V H26
60 BA
40
20 BC
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Total protein (g·100g-1 DW)
6-month
120
100
80 V H26
60 BA
BC F
40 RE
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Total protein (g·100g-1 DW)
Fig 1. CS values of the protein contained in potatoes of different flesh colour varieties after 0, 3 and 6-month
storage in relation to total protein content.
The first limited amino acid: (0-month) Leu; (3-month) Met+Cys (BA, BC, RE, V), Leu (H26, F); (6-month) Thr (BA),
Met+Cys (BC, H26, RE), Leu (V, F)
Table 1. Chemical composition of experimental potatoes at the beginning of storage
The content of protein, the sum of amino acids (g·100 g‒1 DW) in potatoes of six varieties and their dry
matter (g·100 g‒1 FW) as influenced by storage time and variety (mean values of the storage temperature).
attrib vari Blaue Annelise Blue Congo Herbie 26 Rote Emma Vineta Fresco
ute ety
time
of
stor 0 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 6
age
(mo
nth)
total 9.7 9.5 7.11 12. 9.70 8.8 11.1 12. 11.0 12. 11.5 10. 11. 10. 7.27 12. 11. 11.
h h j b h i e ef d g g j j d d
protei 7 6 19 3 2 27 3 26 1 83 78 77 48 36 46
ab ab c
n ±0. ±0.1 ±0. ±0.4 ±0. ±0.1 ±0.7 ±0.4 ±1. ±0.1 ±0. ±1. ±0.
07 ±0. 7 04 3 40 2 ±0. 2 ±0. 6 ±0. 25 2 10 08 91
90 80 29 ±0. 02
61
coagu 2.8 3.2 3.58 2.6 3.39 3.3 3.17 3.3 4.00 2.8 3.84 4.1 2.8 3.8 2.84 1.9 3.4 3.7
h fg de i ef ef g ef ab hi bc a h bc h j ef cd
lable 4 9 0 9 9 0 2 5 0 9 3 2
protei ±0. ±0.3 ±0.2 ±0. ±0. ±0.2 ±0. ±0.3 ±1. ±0.2 ±0. ±0.
16 ±0. 2 ±0. 7 10 ±0.2 15 5 10 4 ±0. 10 0 ±0. 46 39
n 20 10 2 50 ±0. 09
10
Σaa 8.6 7.0 6.30 11. 7.98 6.8 8.49 10. 8.74 10. 11.4 8.2 9.7 8.3 5.78 12. 10. 7.8
e h i b fg h e c e c b d ef j
8 2 13 0 45 60 5 7 2 7 34 38 3g
efg a c
±0. ±0. ±0.5 ±0. ±0.4 ±0. ±0. ±0. ±0.9 ±0. ±0.
07 30 2 46 4 20 ±0.3 79 ±0.7 09 0 ±0. 39 ±0.1 ±0. ±0. 21
6 8 ±0. 23 7 76 72
99
Σeaa 3.2 2.5 2.34 3.9 2.68 2.4 3.04 3.8 2.95 3.7 4.82 3.0 3.4 2.9 2.17 5.6 3.6 3.0
ef hi hi c gh hi fg c fg cd b fg de fg i a cd fg
4 3 5 2 9 8 3 3 2 4 4 4
±0.4 ±0. ±0.1 ±0.2 ±0. ±0. ±0. ±0.1 ±0. ±0.
±0. ±0. ±0.3 4 11 4 ±0. 0 09 ±0.8 ±0. 07 22 1 ±0. 41 12
13 10 5 ±0. 45 1 49 82
16
dry 20. 23. 24.1 23. 23.1 24. 22.0 24. 23.7 21. 22.0 25. 19. 20. 21.9 17. 20. 24.
ef ab bcd bc cde ab cde ab abc de cde a f ef cde g f ab
matte 55 06 8 57 7 68 5 21 1 42 2 51 92 85 1 34 03 06
f
r ±0. ±0. ±0.7 ±0. ±0.9 ±1. ±0.0 ±0. ±0.9 ±0.9 ±1. ±0. ±0. ±1.1 ±0. ±0. ±1.
22 66 8 71 9 12 5 81 8 ±0. 8 13 15 54 8 24 89 31
35
a,b,c,d,e,f, g,h,i,j – means in a row with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05)
Table 4
Essential amino acid index (EAAI) and chemical scores of essential amino acids present in potatoes of
different flesh colour varieties in relation to temperature, time of storage and variety.
essential amino acids
factor EAAI Thr Met+Cys Val Ile Leu Phe+Tyr Lys
storage 2 96 85 74 119 106 74 144 88
temperature
(°C) 5 95 87 70 127 112 69 140 81
protein standard FAO/WHO (1991) 3.4 2.5 3.5 2.8 6.6 6.3 5.8
(g/16 g N)
HIGHLIGHTS
>Amino acids profile and protein quality of stored coloured potatoes were analysed
>Storage temperature did not affected protein content and its nutritive quality
>Losses of Lys, Val, Leu, Thr, His and Arg amino acids occurred in stored potatoes
>The protein of stored potatoes of Fresco and Herbie 26 varieties was of the highest quality
28