You are on page 1of 1

easddddThere might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value (esteem

value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise sh on from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between on from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between on from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between on from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between on from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between t between
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear directi
reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value (esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important. There might be a conflict between reducing costs and maintaining the aesthetic value
(esteem value)
of a product. Whereas a VA exercise should not result in a sacrifice of the product's function in order to
cut costs, it might result in a product that is not as pleasing aesthetically. Where cost cutting and
aesthetics are incompatible, there should be a clear direction from senior management about which is
more important.

You might also like