The 500 Pages Of

FBI Agents Strzok-Page Emails Released

The 2017 Trump

Presidency - #37
June 8th, 2018 to June 19, 2018

HISTORY!
President Donald Trump Meets
Kim Jong Un At Singapore Summit
Articles Compiled From The Internet in Order By Date

By Fred James
1
 PRINTED FOR RESEARCH USE ONLY

Not For Sale

____ of 10 Copies

[Articles and Pictures & Cartoons Found On The Net]

Disclaimer: We encourage all comments and feedback on our articles as we value free speech and
everyone's right to express themselves. We also will not tolerate abusive language, threats or other
behavior that could be considered unlawful. Anything to the contrary will be deleted.

©2018
WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS:
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code)
governs the making of photo copies or other reproductions of copyrighted material.
Under certain conditions specified by law, libraries and archives
are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction.
One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be
"used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research."
If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction
or purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.

This printing typeset / compiled by Fred James

F.R.E.D. Productions
June 2018
FIRST EDITION
0987654321

2
CONTENTS

3
4
5
6
7
HUGE! Dirty McCabe Interrogated Mike Flynn For Russia
Hoax At Same Time Flynn Was Witness Against
McCabe In Sex Discrimination Case
By Jim Hoft
June 7, 2018, 2:02 Pm

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter this week to
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstien who is currently
leading the Department of Justice. As we have previously
reported numerous times Jeff Sessions is still hiding under
his desk.
testify on her behalf. His offer put him as a hostile witness
in a case against McCabe, who was soaring through the
bureau’s leadership ranks.
The FBI sought to block Flynn’s support for the agent,
asking a federal administrative law judge in May 2014 to
keep Flynn and others from becoming a witness in her
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
case, memos obtained by Circa show. Two years later, the
FBI opened its inquiry of Flynn.

Nick Short reported:

In the letter Charles Grassley pointed out to Rosenstein

that General Mike Flynn was a witness against Andrew
McCabe in a sex abuse case when McCabe came to
interview him. McCabe later reportedly altered the 302
interview reports and Mike Flynn was forced out of the
Trump Campaign.

Additionally, former Director McCabe was fired for lack

of candor regarding a leak to the Wall Street Journal, and
Lt. General Flynn was an adverse witness in a pending
sexual discrimination case against Mr. McCabe at the time
Mr. McCabe was supervising a criminal inquiry targeting
Lt. General Flynn.

Sarah Carter at Circa News first reported on this HUGE

conflict of interest last year at Circa News.

The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump

National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after
the retired Army general roiled the bureau’s leadership by
intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism
agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew
McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination,
according to documents and interviews. See letter on next page:

Flynn’s intervention on behalf of Supervisory Special

Agent Robyn Gritz was highly unusual, and included a
letter in 2014 on his official Pentagon stationary, a public
interview in 2015 supporting Gritz’s case and an offer to
8
9
10
 Judicial Watch:
Newly Uncovered Strzok Email Suggests Decision Not To
Prosecute Hillary Clinton Made In April 2016
By Cristina Laila
June 7, 2018, 3:00 Pm

These Clinton-Lynch tarmac documents were located after

a THIRD ‘search’. The new documents consist of 16
pages and 2 Strzok-Page text messages.

The FBI was supposed to release these

16 pages of Clinton-Lynch tarmac
meeting docs to government watchdog
groups last Thursday.

Here they are…FINALLY.

On Thursday, conservative watchdog
Via Judicial Watch:
group Judicial Watch obtained 16 new
FBI documents relating to the Clinton-
Lynch tarmac meeting.
In the latest batch of newly uncovered
docs is an email from Trump-hating FBI
agent Peter Strzok suggesting the
decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton
from her criminal email investigation
was made in April of 2016.
As previously reported, after twice-
denying their existence, the Deep State
admitted to Jay Sekulow and Tom Fitton
it magically found more Clinton-Lynch
tarmac meeting docs and will be forced
to turn them over to the ACLJ and
Judicial Watch by the end of May.
Judicial Watch today released 16
pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) documents related to the June 2016
tarmac meeting between former Attorney
General Loretta Lynch and former
President Bill Clinton showing involvement
of the FBI’s former Chief of
Counterespionage Peter Strzok.
In a previously unseen email, on July 1,
2016, Strzok forwarded to Bill Priestap,
assistant director of FBI counter-
intelligence, and other FBI officials an
article in The New York Times titled then “
Lynch to Remove Herself From Decision
Over Clinton Emails, Official Says.”
Priestap comments on it, saying: “The
meeting in PX is all over CNN TV news this
morning …” Strzok replies: “Timing’s not
ideal in that it falsely adds to those seeking
the ‘this is all choreographed’ narrative. But
I don’t think it’s worth changing … later
won’t be better.” Priestap responds
“Agreed.”
Another Strzok email suggest the
decision on the Clinton email matter has
been under discussion since April
2016—three months before then-FBI
Director James Comey announced he
would recommend no prosecution.

11
Following the Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, a July 1,
2016 email sent from an FBI official warns his colleagues
(with emphasis)
“Our job is to protect the boss [Comey]
from harm and embarrassment.”
Strzok’s email confirms previously released documents
showing James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton before
the investigation into her email conduct had concluded.
“According to the unredacted portions of
the transcripts [released by Senate
Judiciary in October], it appears that in
April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had
already decided he would issue a
statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.
That was long before FBI agents finished
their work.
12
This is well before 17 witnesses were interviewed,
including Hillary Clinton and we’re supposed to believe
the fix wasn’t in?
President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton had this to say
about the new FBI docs released:
“These emails are astonishing, no wonder
the FBI hid them from Judicial Watch and
the court. They show anti-Trump, pro-
Clinton FBI Agent Peter Strzok admitting
the decision not to prosecute the Clinton
email issue was made back in April 2016 –
long before even Hillary Clinton was
interviewed. And the new emails show that
the FBI security had the political objective
of protecting then-Director Comey from
‘embarrassment’—which is, frankly,
disturbing.”
 GOP Chair Ronna McDaniel Says
Trump Agenda Has Destroyed Any Hopes Of A Blue Wave
This November [VIDEO]
Nick Givas | Media And Politics Reporter
4:14 PM 06/07/2018

McDaniel thinks low unemployment numbers and a strong

Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna
McDaniel said Wednesday on Fox Business that President
Donald Trump’s successful agenda has stifled any chance
of a blue wave this November.
“Across [California] yesterday we saw
Republicans turning out in droves in six of
the seven battleground House seats
yesterday that Democrats were counting on
to flip the House,” McDaniel said on “Lou
Dobbs Tonight.” “More Republicans turned
out than Democrats and the seventh one it
was just by a little bit that the Democrats
turned out.”
economic performance have given voters more confidence
in the GOP, while Democrats lack a clear message and
continue to obstruct the president’s agenda.
“That blue wave yesterday became a ripple
and I’ll tell you why. Because the Trump
agenda is working across this
country,” McDaniel added. “Unemployment
at record low. People are feeling better,
wages are up and they want to see the
comeback continue. And they’re not going
to hand this nation over to the obstruct and
resist Democrat party of no.”

WATCH:

13
 SARA CARTER: DOJ Reneges On
Commitment To Give Trump-Russia Docs To Congress
By Cristina Laila
June 7, 2018, 4:46 Pm
It is time to impeach Rosenstein and hold
him contempt.
The Department of Justice reneged on its
commitment to provide Congress with
pertinent Trump-Russia docs on Thursday.
The American people have had it with the
stonewalling from Rosenstein and Wray.
Sara Carter reported:
The Department of Justice reneged on a
commitment to provide access to documents
they promised to congressional lawmakers by
Thursday morning. Instead, DOJ issued a press
release after midnight suggesting they will only
meet with a group of select lawmakers to
discuss the matter on the same day the North
Korea summit opens in Singapore, according to
numerous sources and a DOJ statement.
Moreover, the Justice Department also issued
new stipulations for briefing congressional
members and limited the meeting with only the
Gang of Eight, which is comprised of eight
leaders within Congress who are briefed
on classified intelligence matters.
These sources claim that briefing Gang of Eight
lawmakers restricts the dissemination and
discussion of the documents that will be taken
for review. Although the DOJ contends that the
documents are highly sensitive material, in
reality, these documents are not considered to
contain high-level national security information.
14
Do not be fooled by this meeting with the Gang of Eight;
this is just another way for the DOJ to provide heavily
redacted documents to oversight in Congress.
On May 24th, House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes
and Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy headed into a
meeting with senior Justice Department, FBI and
intelligence officials to view classified documents and
discuss Spygate.
Nunes demanded the Justice Department hand over the
unredacted memo outlining the scope of Special Counsel
Robert Mueller’s authority and the name of the FBI secret
informant inside Trump’s campaign in 2016.
Gowdy and Nunes DID NOT receive the documents they
requested that day.
It’s time for serious action. Just like Chris Farrell of
Judicial Watch says, bring in the US Marshals.
Sara Carter elaborated on Thursday’s development:
In last night’s press release, however, the DOJ
admitted to having the documents. A senior
Justice Department official accused the
committee members of not reviewing the
documents provided at the May meeting stating,
“The Department and FBI will also provide the
documents that were available for review but
not inspected by the members at the previous
briefing along with some additional material.”
The DOJ official said with regard to not
providing the documents on Thursday,
“Although the Department and FBI would have
liked to provide this information as early as this
week, officials have taken a little additional time
to provide the most fulsome answers to the
members’ questions as possible. The
Department and FBI take congressional
inquiries seriously and believes that the
documents provided next week will be valuable
to the Gang of Eight.”
President Trump should declassify the documents and put
an end to this farce once and for all.
 GOP Lawmaker: Impeach Rod Rosenstein If DOJ
Continues To Slow-Walk Trump Spying Documents To
Congress (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 7, 2018, 5:14 Pm

Rep. Andy Biggs: Yes I have no problem with that. Yeah,

It’s time to impeach Rod Rosenstein and
hold him contempt.
The Department of Justice reneged on its
commitment to provide Congress with
pertinent Trump-Russia docs on Thursday.
I think he is engaged in conduct that is at such a level that
it constitutes a breach of trust which is the common
definition of high crime and misdemeanor.
Via After the Bell:

The American people have had it with the

stonewalling from Rod Rosenstein and
Christopher Wray.

On Thursday Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) said it

was time to impeach Deputy Attorney
General for the DOJ if he continued to slow-
walk requested documents to the US
Congress.

David Asman: Are you suggesting we impeach Rod

Rosenstein?
.

15
 A Failing Report Card For Donald Trump
Isaac Davis, Staff Writer Waking Times
June 7, 2018
Political candidates have a long history of making
promises they don’t keep. It’s an American tradition as old
as apple pie and white picket fences, and every four years
presidential candidates turn up the BS and Americans
willingly deceive themselves and buy into more empty
promises.
Donald Trump is perhaps the most hated president in
modern history, and the most polarizing, and while those
who understand how the political system works never
believed for a minute that he would be able to deliver on
his campaign promises, the alternative and independent
press still supported him. Almost two years into his
presidency, we now know that he is more or less just like
all the rest, marching to the tune of deep state elements and
corporate powers that haunt the American political system.
For the record, here is a list of Trump’s accomplishments,
or non-accomplishments, as they relate to a number of his
campaign promises. This list was compiled anonymously
and sent to us here at Waking Times, and it serves as a
reminder that the American political system is terminally
broken and that by voting and participating in it, the
American people are effectively expressing the depths of
their cognitive dissonance and unwillingness to demand
true representation.
Take a look:
 Big Swamp Creature Arrests: 0
 Big Swamp Creature Prosecutions: 0
 Big Swamp Creatures Imprisoned: 0
 Big Swamp Creatures Executed: 0
 Swamp Level: Critical
 State Of The Swamp: Rising
 Wall On Southern Border: No
 Mass Deportations Of Criminal Invaders: No
16
 Unconstitutional Wars Ended: 0
 Unconstitutional Decades Long Occupations
Ended: 0
 War Crimes Prosecuted: 0
 Lock Her Up: No
 Waco Arrests Of The Murderers: No
 Lavoy Finicums’ Murderers Brought To Justice: No
 Randy Weavers Wifes’ Murderers Brought To
Justice: No
 9/11 Domestic Criminals Brought To Justice: No
 Edward Snowden Patriotism Recognized: No
 Government Spending Cut: No
 Government Costs Cut: No
 Affordable Medical And Drugs: N
 Real Cost Of Living Increase For Ssa/Ssi: No
 Missing $21-$50 Trillion Recovered: No
(See Solari.Com Missing $21 Trillion)
 Revocation Of Patriot Act: No
 End Of Spying On Citizens: No
 Increasing War Efforts: Yes
 Hidden Tax On Americans With Tariffs: Yes
 Big Tax Breaks For Billionaires: Yes
 Big A$$ Tax Break For Trump: Yes
 Gun Control: Yes
 Loss Of Rights: Yes
 False Hope, Faith, And Trust: 100% All-Time-High
Moron Rating!
Now, this list is only a partial summary of broken
promises. Adding to this, we can include the following:
 Holding Saudi Arabia Accountable For Terrorism
And 9/11: No
 Outing Neocon Actors From Government
Positions: No
 Improving Relations With Russia: No
 Improve The Situation In Syria: No
 Ditching Nato: No
 Addressing The Fraud And Criminality In The
Financial System: No
 Stopping The Drone Killings Of Innocent
Bystanders In Other Countries: No
This list really could go on and one, but we’ll conclude
with the big ambiguous promise of MAKING
AMERICAN GREAT AGAIN. What do you think about
this one? Is America on the road to becoming great again
under the leadership of Donald Trump?
 Ryan Remarks On Trump
‘Spygate’ Leave Conservatives Fuming
By Katie Bo Williams And Olivia Beavers
06/07/18 05:22 Pm Edt
A vocal bloc of House conservatives are fuming at Paul
Ryan (R-Wis.) behind the scenes, after the lame-duck
speaker publicly sided with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) in
the debate over the FBI’s tactics in its investigation into
the Trump campaign.
Gowdy shot down allegations last week that the FBI
improperly used a confidential informant to “spy” on the
campaign, saying that the bureau “did exactly what my
fellow citizens would want them to do.”
Ryan on Wednesday called Gowdy’s assessment
“accurate,” dealing another blow to the claims dubbed
“spygate” by President Trump.
But Trump allies on Capitol Hill say Gowdy, a former
prosecutor, defended the FBI before reviewing key
underlying documents — and they are furious that Ryan
has backed him.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a freshman who has emerged as
one of the most vocal critics of the FBI, blasted Ryan for
the statement on Thursday, calling his support of the
bureau “shameful.”
House Freedom Caucus co-founder Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)
called Ryan’s decision “frustrating.”
“I don’t know how you can reach that
conclusion based on the history of the FBI,”
he told The Hill.
Another House Republican familiar with the concerns also
fumed about Ryan’s statement.
“It is very frustrating when leadership
indicates that they are supportive of a
statement that the FBI didn’t do anything
wrong,” the lawmaker told The Hill.
Gaetz, Jordan and a handful of other conservative
lawmakers on Capitol Hill have gone to war with the
Department of Justice (DOJ) in recent months, accusing
the law enforcement agency of corruption and anti-Trump
bias during the 2016 presidential campaign.
17
Gowdy — who, like Ryan, is retiring — has supported
some of those efforts while carefully distancing himself
from some of the more outlandish allegations.
Ryan has largely stayed out of the fray, at least publicly,
but he has leant his weight to efforts by GOP lawmakers to
wrest access to documents related to the ongoing
investigation.
His remarks on Wednesday were the most direct
repudiation he has offered of Trump allies’ efforts to
investigate the Justice Department.
Other House Republicans have largely stayed silent on the
dispute over the informant. One other retiring member,
Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.), on Wednesday ripped the
notion that the use of the informant was a conspiracy
against the president, suggesting that its champions only
want to “create more chaos.”
Justice Department and intelligence community
representatives briefed Gowdy and Ryan along with other
top lawmakers about the bureau’s use of the informant late
last month. But the lawmakers’ request to view the
underlying documents related to the source remains unmet.
Critics of the Justice Department say the law enforcement
agency has dragged its feet on congressional requests for
information on a host of issues — requests that Democrats
have slammed as politically motivated and the DOJ has
said could expose sensitive sources and methods.
Speaking to reporters Thursday, Ryan was not asked —
and did not volunteer any comments — about the
criticism. But the Speaker suggested congressional
Republicans were making more progress in obtaining
answers from the DOJ because of his personal
involvement.
“Honestly, it's our job to conduct oversight
over every department in the executive
branch but especially departments like the
Department of Justice that affect our civil
liberties,” Ryan said at his weekly press
briefing.
 “So that is why you've seen frustration.
Frustration that the foot dragging by the
Department of Justice should not be
tolerated. And so it's funny: Because I've
gotten involved as Speaker of the House is
why we’ve gotten as far as we’ve gotten,”
he said.
The same senior lawmakers who attended the briefing on
the informant will be given access to some documents in a
follow-on briefing next week, a Justice Department official
revealed this week.
Jordan on Wednesday evening pointed to Ryan’s support
for their efforts to obtain documents, if not their use of the
term “spy” to describe the informant’s role.
“I do think the speaker in his statement said
that he wants the documents produced,”
Jordan said, stating that Ryan “needs to
give a deadline” for documents.
Gowdy turned heads during multiple television
appearances last week, after the briefing, where he stated
unequivocally that the FBI acted properly in its use of the
informant.
“I am even more convinced that the FBI did
exactly what my fellow citizens would want
them to do when they got the information
they got, and that it has nothing to do with
Donald Trump,” Gowdy said on Fox News.
Gowdy then told CBS News he had seen no evidence to
support Trump’s claims that a “spy” was improperly
.
18
inserted into his 2016 campaign, saying he has “never
heard the term ‘spy' used” in the criminal justice system.
A third Republican present in the briefings, Senate
Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.)
has also backed Gowdy’s assessment.
Gaetz, Jordan and several other House conservatives
acutely critical of the DOJ were not present.
There is no public evidence that the FBI’s use of a
confidential informant — common in counterintelligence
and criminal investigations — was improper.
Several Republican lawmakers involved in the dispute said
Gowdy’s remarks have been overblown to suggest a
complete exoneration of the FBI’s conduct during the 2016
campaign.
“I think Trey was talking about something
very specific that has been interpreted as
something much more broad,” one of the
lawmakers said. “I think he was talking
about a particular point of time with a
particular piece of information that the FBI
had and under the umbrella of a criminal
investigation.”
But, Jordan said Tuesday, Gowdy and others are mistaken
to
“take the FBI’s word for it in a briefing that
they are doing everything right.”
“I just don’t buy it,” he said.
 BREAKING: Horowitz Reveals Release Date Of Much-
Anticipated IG Report — ON TRUMP’S BIRTHDAY!
June 7, 2018, 5:48 Pm By Cristina Laila
Inspector General Horowitz sent a letter to
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley
on Thursday revealing he will be releasing
his much-anticipated report on the FBI’s
(mis)handling of Hillary’s email investigation
on June 14th.
Horowitz is also set to testify in a
Congressional hearing on June 18th.
June 14th is President Donald J. Trump’s birthday.
“Thank you for inviting me to testify on June
18th before the Senate Judiciary Committee on
June 18, 2018 about the findings in the Office of
the Inspector General’s forthcoming review of
the allegations regarding various actions of the
FBI and DOJ prior to the 2016 election,”
Horowitz began in his letter to Senator
Grassley.
“Additionally, prior to the June 18 hearing, the
OIG intends to release our report publicly and to
provide the report’s classified appendix to our
oversight committees. We will release the report
as soon as we complete the OIG’s ordinary
processes for the review and classification of
such reports, which we have been following and
which we described to you in our letter on May
16, 2018.” Horowitz continued.
19
Inspector General Horowitz concluded his letter by stating
he “anticipates releasing the report on June 14.”
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
informed lawmakers three weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 400 page
report on the FBI’s handling of Hillary
Clinton’s email investigation entered the
final stages.
Lawyers for the subjects included in the report were given
a draft copy to prepare rebuttals for their clients which is
what partially led to delays in releasing the report to the
public.
The Senate Judiciary Committee was
supposed to hold a hearing on the Inspector
General’s report on June 5th.
The release date of the IG report keeps getting pushed
back which prompted President Trump to fire off a tweet
this week asking,
“What is taking so long?”
“Numerous delays. Hope Report is not being
changed and made weaker!” Trump said in a
tweet on Tuesday.
Lawmakers also warned Tuesday the
Inspector General is being pressured to
slow walk and redact significant portions of
his much-anticipated report on the FBI’s
(mis)handling of the Clinton investigation.
Sources are saying the report on the FBI’s
7th floor under Comey’s Directorship is
absolutely damning and “worse than
expected.”
Screenshot of letter:
20
21
22
23
 DISGUSTING NEW LOW:
CNN Claims Donald Trump Was Soft Porn Star
By Jim Hoft
June 7, 2018, 7:01 Pm

A new low for the liberal media..

CNN claims President Trump was a porn

star today.
From the report:
Christopher Massie is a reporter for CNN’s
KFILE.
CNN and BuzzFeed reported in 2016 that
Trump appeared in Playboy films in 1994, 2000,
Today Massie reported that Donald Trump
and 2001. In the first appearance, Trump is
was a porn star… A soft-porn star.
seen photographing clothed models with a
Polaroid camera and interviewing a Playmate.
In the second, he opens a bottle of champagne
on a Playboy-branded limousine as visiting
Playmates cheer. In the third, he appears
backstage at a fashion show with two
Playmates along with the future first lady, then
Melania Knauss, his girlfriend at the time.

Donald Trump appeared with his wife Melania in a

Playboy movie.

For this CNN labels him a soft porn star.

Unreal.

A new low for Very Fake News CNN.

Today Massie reported that Donald Trump

was a porn star… A soft-porn star.

Giuliani says people in the porn business are not credible.

Trump has appeared in three softcore porn videos.

24
 Lou Dobbs: We Have To Get Rid Of Paul Ryan –
Republicans Are At Risk In November If They Stick With
This Failed Lameduck (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 7, 2018, 7:40 Pm

By the way, do you agree that we got to get

rid of Paul Ryan? Because he is just an
albatross. He is just this big black bird
hanging around the Republican Party’s
neck. I mean I think everyone running for
reelection in the House is at risk if they stay
with this failed lameduck.

Via Lou Dobbs Tonight:

Any regular viewer of Lou Dobbs

Tonight knows that Lou is NOT a fan of
Speaker Paul Ryan.

On Thursday Lou Dobbs went after Speaker Ryan saying

House Republicans are in danger if they stick with Paul
Ryan up to the November election.

Lou Dobbs:

25
 Battle Over ‘Spygate’
Documents Will Soon Come To A Head
8:23 PM 06/07/2018
The Justice Department has offered to brief the so-called
Gang of Eight regarding documents about the FBI’s use of
an informant to maintain contact with members of the
Trump campaign.
The DOJ said it would provide access on Monday or
Tuesday — with a possible delay — to documents related
to a subpoena issued in May by House Intelligence
Committee chairman Devin Nunes in a late-night
statement issued on Wednesday.
The documents, which deal with an FBI informant who
has been identified as Stefan Halper, are at the center of a
tense battle involving congressional Republicans, the
Justice Department and the White House.
The Justice Department has resisted requests for
documents related to Halper, who was revealed as a
longtime CIA and FBI informant weeks after Nunes’s
initial request.
Halper, 73, was in contact with three Trump campaign
advisers — Carter Page, Sam Clovis and George
Papadopoulos — in the lead-up to the 2016 election.
He first made contact with Page on July 11, 2016 at a
symposium at Cambridge University. That was nearly
three weeks before the FBI opened “Crossfire Hurricane,”
the counterintelligence investigation into possible
collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian
government.
Halper and Page remained in contact for 14 months,
through September 2017.
26
Lawmakers will not confirm what documents they are
requesting from the DOJ, but they seemingly want to find
out what rationale the FBI used to task Halper to make
contact with the Trump campaign and what documentation
was created authorizing the surveillance operation.
The DOJ initially rejected Nunes’s request, claiming that
revealing information about the informant would risk his
life and other secret operations.
Justice Department officials took the documents into a
briefing on May 24 but did not provide them to lawmakers,
a source familiar with the discussions told The Daily
Caller News Foundation.
DOJ officials also asked lawmakers not to publicize that
documents were taken into the meeting, the source said.
Despite that request, the DOJ revealed in its statement on
Wednesday that officials took the records into the meeting
but did not turn them over to lawmakers.
The Justice Department and FBI now say that officials
“are prepared to brief members on certain
questions specifically raised by the
Speaker and other members.”
“The Department and FBI will also provide
the documents that were available for
review but not inspected by the members
at the previous briefing along with some
additional material,” reads the statement.
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California, a member of
the Gang of Eight, criticized the DOJ’s offer for a briefing.
“The further disclosure of investigative
materials is inexplicable,” said Schiff, who
has fought against the release of various
documents related to the Russia
investigation, including information about
the infamous Steele dossier.
“The DOJ is now reinforcing a precedent it
will have to live with, whether the Congress
is in Republican or Democratic hands, of
providing materials in pending or closed
cases to the legislative branch upon
request,” Schiff added.
President Donald Trump has dubbed the FBI’s use of an
informant “Spygate,” claiming the FBI planted a spy in his
campaign. Democrats and many media outlets have pushed
back on the claim and quibbled with Halper being labeled
a spy.
Some Republicans have also bucked Trump.
“I am even more convinced that the FBI did
exactly what my fellow citizens would want
them to do,” Republican Rep. Trey
Gowdy of South Carolina said in a Fox
News interview on May 30.
“It looks to me like the FBI was doing what
President Trump said I want you to do —
find it out,” said Gowdy, who added that
Trump himself is not a target of the
collusion probe.
.
27
Gowdy’s comments drew some pushback, with critics
noting that he had not seen DOJ and FBI documents that
would shed light on the informant’s activities.
Speaker Paul Ryan also appeared to back Gowdy up on
Wednesday, saying he had
“seen no evidence to the contrary of the
initial assessment that Chairman Gowdy
has made.”
Ryan clarified those comments on Thursday, saying he
wants to see “the corroborating documents that back up”
what DOJ and FBI officials told the Gang of Eight in the
May 24 briefing.
He also added he has seen “no
evidence that there’s any collusion
between the Trump campaign, and
President Trump and Russia.”
 Jeff Sessions Delivers: DOJ Nails Senate
Intel Committee’s Security Chief As Deep State Leaker
By Ian Mason
7 Jun 2018

“The revelation of Page’s connection to

Senior Justice Department officials
announced late Thursday criminal
charges against Senate Intelligence
Committee’s long-time director of
security James Wolfe.
The indictment charges Wolfe with making false
statements to the FBI and details how Wolfe passed
classified information, including presumably information
related to one-time Trump campaign aide Carter Page, to a
series of media outlets, confirming long-standing
suspicions of the career intelligence community’s
complicity in leaks. The three-count indictment charges
Wolfe with separate instances of making false statements
to the FBI, not directly charging him for leaking classified
information, but appearing to detail how he did allegedly
leaked classified information to reporters and then
allegedly lied about it to the FBI.
The 11-page indictment does not name the reporters and
does not name the person about whom classified
information was leaked, but labels them as “Reporter #1,”
“Reporter #2,” “Reporter #3,” and “Reporter #4” as well as
“MALE-1” respectively. It is presumed that “MALE-1” is
Page, the ex-Trump aide, and “Reporter #2” is then-
Buzzfeed News now New York Times reporter Ali Watkins.
Watkins broke the Carter Page angle of the “Russia
investigation” back in April 2017 with a story called “A
Former Trump Adviser Met With A Russian Spy.” In
it, Watkins claimed,
28
Russian intelligence — which occurred
more than three years before his
association with Trump — is the most
clearly documented contact to date
between Russian intelligence and someone
in Trump’s orbit.”
The Wolfe indictment makes clear that the
government was investigating a leak about
Carter Page meeting with a Russian intel
operative in 2013 when it seized
@aliwatkins' email and phone records.
Here's the story: https://t.co/Q7l2Z7uHs2
pic.twitter.com/pSwXXG49wF
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 8, 2018
Based on accusations in the Wolfe indictment, it appears
this scoop, that Page had been in contact with a Russian
intelligence operative back in 2013, was based entirely on
classified information Wolfe was privy to as a result of his
position and which he allegedly leaked to Watkins.
After her explosive Buzzfeed scoop about Page, Watkins
secured a job at the prestigious New York Times — where
she is currently employed. The Times, earlier on Thursday,
before the indictment was unveiled, reported that Watkins
and Wolfe were “in a romantic relationship” at the time
Wolfe leaked the Carter Page documents. Texts included
in the indictment appear indicative not only of Wolfe’s
willingness to leak to Watkins, but his personal connection
to her as well. One particularly telling text from Wolfe to
Watkins reads:
I always tried to give you as much information that I could
and to do the right thing with it so you could get that scoop
before anyone else . . . . I always enjoyed the way that you
would pursue a story,like nobody else was doing in my
hal1way. I felt like I was part of your excitement and was
always very supportive of your career and the tenacity that
you exhibited to chase down a good story.
When interviewed by FBI agents in December 2017,
Wolfe allegedly denied any contact with Watkins and at
least two other journalists to whom he is accused of
leaking classified information. Confronted with
photographs of he and Watkins together, he relented,
admitting he had lied, but denying discussing or passing
Senate Intelligence Committee information to her. It is
these alleged false statements with which Wolfe was
charged Thursday.
The Times story earlier Thursday about Watkins and
Wolfe detailed that as part of this investigation,
“prosecutors also secretly seized years’ worth of a New
York Times reporter’s phone and email records.”
The indictment contains no charges related to the classified
information itself, but the investigation is reportedly
continuing with left-leaning news outlets apparently
outraged that Watkins’s phone records have been seized as
part of the probe:
This story concerns a reporter's work
@BuzzFeedNews. We are deeply troubled
by what looks like a case of law
enforcement interfering with a reporter’s
constitutional right to gather information
about her own government.
https://t.co/5nus2syio3
.
29
— Ben Smith (@BuzzFeedBen) June 8,
2018
Wolfe’s arrest comes after Attorney General Jeff Sessions
testified, in November 2017, that the Justice Department
had numerous ongoing leaks investigations, including
presumably this one.
“Members of the committee, we had about
nine open investigations of classified leaks
in the last three years,” Sessions testified
to a House committee. “We have 27
investigations open today. We intend to get
to the bottom of these leaks.”
Even earlier, in August 2017, Sessions delivered a stern
warning to would-be leakers,
“Don’t do it.”
This is a developing story.
 French President Macron Turns
On Trump – President Trump Responds
By Jim Hoft
June 7, 2018, 8:49 Pm

It took only a few hours for President

Donald Trump to respond.

French President Emanuel Macron

challenged President Donald Trump on
Thursday after the US president hit the
European Union on their unfair trade
policies with the United States.

Arthur Schwartz says watch for a

sudden humiliating surrender.

Here is the video in French.

30
 CBS, NBC Skip News Of DOJ
Watchdog Finding Comey ‘Insubordinate’
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 7, 2018 9:53 PM EDT
On Wednesday, media outlets began reporting of a draft
Justice Department Inspector General report floating
around that was highly critical of former FBI Director
James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
But come Thursday evening, both CBS and NBC failed to
mention it even though they each had the opportunity to
report the development during two of evening broadcasts
and their morning shows.
The IG report was said to have found that Comey was
warned not to notify the public he reopened the
investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails in October
2016, but he did it anyway. Of course, ABC, which was
the only network to mention the news, pounced on it to
push the suggestion it might have had an influence on the
outcome of the election.
During ABC’s first report, on Wednesday evening’s World
News Tonight, chief Justice correspondent Pierre Thomas
somberly went through the timeline of that dreary day for
Clinton:
Hillary Clinton was on a flight to Iowa when it happened.
FBI Director James Comey revealing he had reopened the
investigation into her e-mails, a stunning October surprise
just 11 days before the election. (…) Clinton huddled with
aides for nearly an hour. (…) President Trump, now one of
Comey's biggest critics, at the time, heaped praise on the
director.
All that before getting to what the report found.
“[A] senior Justice Department official
had urged Comey not to reveal he was
reopening the Clinton probe so close to
the election. That doing so would violate
31
long-standing department policy,”
Thomas finally reported. “But those
sources also say the report concludes
Comey defied authority more than once.
One source telling ABC News the report
describes Comey's behavior as
insubordinate.”
In a related but separate development, former Deputy FBI
Director Andrew McCabe was requesting “use immunity”
from the Senate Judiciary Committee in exchange for
testimony about the handling of the Clinton e-mail
investigation. This time, ABC joined both CBS and NBC
in being dead silent about this development over the same
Wednesday-Thursday timeframe.
“Normally it's the FBI on the side of
prosecutors offering deals to potential
criminal witnesses,” quipped Fox News
Channel anchor Shannon Bream during
Wednesday’s Special Report. “Tonight,
the former number two man at the FBI is
seeking immunity for himself. Andrew
McCabe wants a protection in exchange
for telling Congress what he knows
about Hillary Clinton's emails.”
Doing what these three broadcast networks wouldn’t, Fox
News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge
explained why McCabe would want that immunity.
“ It's called ‘use immunity’ and it means
McCabe’s testimony cannot be used
against him in a criminal prosecution,”
she said. “The Inspector General found
that McCabe lied under oath and made a
criminal referral to the U.S. attorney
 here in D.C. for lying to federal
investigators.”
According to Herridge, “[t]his morning a senior Senate
Republican on the Judiciary Committee recommended
against a deal to secure McCabe’s testimony.”
To show what they considered a greater priority, these
broadcast networks chose to report on more frivolous
topics like Starbucks raising their prices a few cents and
road rage somewhere. NBC thought it was worth the
airtime to report on a baseball fan who caught a foul ball
with her beer and then finished it off with the ball still in it.
Nothing but the most important of news, clearly.
The transcripts are below:
ABC
World News Tonight
June 6, 2018
6:42:52 PM Eastern [1 minute 58 seconds]
DAVID MUIR: Next tonight, what ABC News has learned about a
new report coming on James Comey. The blistering criticism in
this new draft report. What he was warned not to do just 11 days
before the election involving Hillary Clinton, and what he did
anyway. Here's ABC's chief Justice correspondent Pierre
Thomas tonight.
[Cuts to video]
PIERRE THOMAS: Hillary Clinton was on a flight to Iowa when it
happened. FBI Director James Comey revealing he had
reopened the investigation into her e-mails, a stunning October
surprise just 11 days before the election.
HILLARY CLINTON: I learned about it on the campaign plane,
and I was stunned, to be honest. I didn't know what to think about
it, because I knew there was nothing there. I was just
dumbfounded. I thought, what is he doing?
THOMAS: Clinton huddled with aides for nearly an hour.
UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: Secretary Clinton, any reaction to
the FBI investigation?
THOMAS: President Trump, now one of Comey's biggest critics,
at the time, heaped praise on the director.
DONALD TRUMP: And it took guts for director Comey to make
the move that he made.
THOMAS: The Justice Department's inspector general has been
looking into Comey's decision, and now, sources familiar with a
draft of his report tell ABC News, a senior Justice Department
official had urged Comey not to reveal he was reopening the
Clinton probe so close to the election. That doing so would
32
violate long-standing department policy. But those sources also
say the report concludes Comey defied authority more than once.
One source telling ABC News the report describes Comey's
behavior as insubordinate.
Comey has defended his actions, saying they were to protect the
integrity of the FBI.
JAMES COMEY: Given what I knew at the time, these were the
decisions that were best calculated to preserve the values of the
institutions.
[Cuts back to live]
THOMAS: The draft report also criticizes former Attorney General
Loretta Lynch for not clearly recusing herself after she met
President Clinton on her plane during that campaign, David.
MUIR: Pierre Thomas live at the Justice Department. Pierre,
thank you.
Fox News Channel
Special Report
June 6, 2018
6:04:40 PM Eastern
SHANNON BREAM: Normally it's the FBI on the side of
prosecutors offering deals to potential criminal witnesses.
Tonight, the former number two man at the FBI is seeking
immunity for himself. Andrew McCabe wants a protection in
exchange for telling Congress what he knows about Hillary
Clinton's emails. Also tonight, a new report taking issue with the
former head man at the bureau and how he did his job. Chief
intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge has details on
these astounding developments.
(…)
CATHERINE HERRIDGE: In a separate development, Fox News
confirms that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who
worked directly under Comey wants a special status if he testifies
on Capitol Hill. It's called “use immunity” and it means McCabe’s
testimony cannot be used against him in a criminal prosecution.
The Inspector General found that McCabe lied under oath and
made a criminal referral to the U.S. attorney here in D.C. for lying
to federal investigators. This morning a senior Senate Republican
on the Judiciary Committee recommended against a deal to
secure McCabe’s testimony.
JOHN CORNYN: We really need to get to the bottom of what
happened at the FBI during the Comey years where apparently
there was misconduct going on which I think is really impugned
the reputation of the finest law enforcement agency in the world.
And we need to clear the air. And so, I think giving Mr. McCabe
cover through immunity would be a mistake.
HERRIDGE: McCabe’s lawyer said, quote, "McCabe is willing to
testify but because of the criminal referral he must be afforded
suitable legal protection.” Adding, that if he were unable to get
such deal, McCabe, quote, “will have no choice but to invoke his
Fifth Amendment privilege against self-determination."
33
Testimony is scheduled for Monday before the Senate Judiciary
Committee that has the lead on the Inspector General's report,
but that date could slip yet again, Shannon.
(…)
 DOJ Seizes NY Times Reporter’s Phone And Email
Records In Leak Investigation – Former
Senate Intel Aide Arrested
By Cristina Laila
June 7, 2018, 10:14 Pm
Former Senate Intel Committee aide,
James A. Wolfe, 57, was arrested on
Thursday after the DOJ conducted an
investigation into classified information
leaks to reporters.
Wolfe repeatedly lied to investigators
about his contacts with reporters and
made false statements to the FBI.
The Justice Department also seized New
York Times reporter, Ali Watkins years’
worth of phone and email records.
Watkins previously worked for Buzzfeed
and Politico as a national security
reporter.
New York Times reporter Ali Watkins
The New York Times reported:
A former Senate Intelligence Committee
aide was arrested Thursday in an
investigation of classified information leaks
where prosecutors also secretly seized
years’ worth of a New York Times
reporter’s phone and email records.
The former aide, James A. Wolfe, 57, was
charged with lying repeatedly to
investigators about his contacts with three
reporters. According to the authorities, Mr.
Wolfe made false statements to the F.B.I.
about providing two of them with private
information related to the committee’s
34
work. They did not say whether it was
classified.
Mr. Wolfe was slated to appear before a
federal judge on Friday in Washington.
Reached Thursday evening before his
arrest, Mr. Wolfe declined to comment.
Mr. Wolfe’s case led to the first known
instance of the Justice Department going
after a reporter’s data under President
Trump.
According to the NY Times, Ali Watkins was having a
romantic relationship with the Senate Intel aide, Wolfe.
Some of their communication back and forth took place
before she was employed by The New York Times.
It is being reported Wolfe worked in a ‘bipartisan’ capacity
for both Republicans and Democrats on the Committee for
over 30 years as an Army Intel analyst; he retired in May.
On Wednesday, Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) requested
unanimous consent to approve the resolution.
The Senate moved quickly to provide documents to the
DOJ in response to requests relating to the investigation
into the leaks.
Fox News reported:
Portman, who is not a member of the
intelligence committee, then made the
standard request heard multiple times each
day on the Senate floor: “I ask unanimous
consent that the resolution be agreed to,
the preamble be agreed to, and the motion
to reconsider be considered made and laid
upon the table with no intervening action or
debate.”
No one objected, meaning the Senate
approved the resolution.
The Senate often conducts business and
approves measures via “unanimous
consent.” That means no member objects
to approving a given matter. Such issues
 are typically cleared with all 100 senators in investigation should be directed to the
advance. However, many aides and senior Department of Justice.”
sources were unaware that the resolution
A few weeks ago, President Trump put
was coming to the floor.
White House leakers on notice.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman
“We will find out who they are,” said the
Richard Burr, R-N.C., and ranking member President after referring to leakers as
Mark Warner, D-Va., issued a joint
“traitors and cowards.”
statement Wednesday:
“As noted in the Senate Resolution, the Attorney General Jeff Sessions said back in November,
Department of Justice has sought the
assistance of the Committee in a pending
“We intend to get to the bottom of these
investigation. The Committee is
leaks.”
cooperating with the Department on this
matter. Any questions about the
.

35
 DOJ Expected To Indict
Ex-Senate Intel Staffer In Leak Probe
Chuck Ross | Reporter
12:47 AM 06/08/2018
The Department of Justice is expected to indict a former
staffer on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
over an unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information.
CNN and The Wall Street Journal report that the
indictment will be handed down within days. The staffer
has not been identified, though The Journal reported that
he is 31 years old and has worked for both Democrats and
Republicans.
The Senate quietly passed a resolution on Wednesday to
provide information for the case to the Justice Department.
36
“The Select Committee on Intelligence has
received a request from the Department of
Justice for records pertinent to a pending
investigation arising out of allegations of
the unauthorized disclosure of information
by a former employee of the Committee,”
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
said in a statement for the congressional
record on Wednesday.
It is not clear if the information is classified or whether it
is related to the committee’s investigation of Russian
meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.
North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, the Republican
chairman of the Senate panel, declined to discuss the
matter when asked by CNN.
“We can’t get into personnel issues,” he
said, referring reporters to the Justice
Department.
 Sara Carter: DOJ RENEGES On Pledge To Give Trump-
Russia Documents To Congress: WHERE Is Jeff Sessions?
Posted On June 8, 2018
(National Sentinel) Insubordinate: There likely isn’t a
day that goes by anymore when POTUS Donald Trump
doesn’t get up in the morning wondering how he could
have been duped into naming Jeff Sessions his attorney
general.
To say that the former Alabama senator has been a
disappointment is a gross understatement.
As Trump has battled the Deep State, bureaucrats, a hostile
Pravda media, and world leaders as he attempts to bring
America back from the dank, dark hole Obama put us in,
he’s been stymied on more than one occasion by his own
appointees.
AG Jeff Sessions has been one of the worst offenders.
In recent days congressional leaders received assurances
from the Justice Department that documents they’ve
been demanding — and have every right to see —
regarding the “Trump-Russia collusion/Spygate”
investigation would be forthcoming.
Now, reports ace investigative journalist
Sara A. Carter, the DoJ has reneged on
its promise.
Worse, she writes, the next time the
department plans to meet over the
issue will be when POTUS Trump is tied
down during his historic meeting with
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
37
These corrupt Deep State hacks are too clever by half.
Carter writes:
The Department of Justice reneged on a
commitment to provide access to
documents they promised to congressional
lawmakers by Thursday morning. Instead,
DOJ issued a press release after midnight
suggesting they will only meet with a group
of select lawmakers to discuss the matter
on the same day the North Korea summit
opens in Singapore, according to
numerous sources and a DOJ statement.
Moreover, the Justice Department also
issued new stipulations for briefing
congressional members and limited the
meeting with only the Gang of Eight, which
is comprised of eight leaders within
Congress who are briefed on classified
intelligence matters.
These sources claim that briefing Gang of
Eight lawmakers restricts the dissemination
and discussion of the documents that will
be taken for review. Although the DOJ
contends that the documents are highly
sensitive material, in reality, these
documents are not considered to contain
high-level national security information.
So while it seems that DOJ is complying,
congressional sources say it means that
the documents provided may be highly
redacted.
A source familiar with the discussions
stated that the documents, “…do not rise to
Gang of Eight level material requiring such
strict rules that would limit those members
to discuss the material with other
lawmakers.”
So in other words, there is nothing classified in these
documents. They are only “sensitive” because the likely
contain information that not only exonerates POTUS
Trump but implicates other FBI and DoJ officials in acts of
malfeasance or even crimes.
Carter notes that in the May 24 meeting between House
Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif.,
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-
Calif., and FBI Director Christopher Wray — along with
other DoJ officials — the congressional members
were implored not to tell anyone that Justice had the
documents they were seeking.
However, she writes, in the late-night statement, DoJ noted
that it had the sought-after documents.
“The Department and FBI will also provide
the documents that were available for
review but not inspected by the members
at the previous briefing along with some
additional material,” the department said.
“This request for documents is not at the
Gang of Eight level,” a source familiar with
the matter told Carter.
“This is yet another line of obfuscation,
stonewalling and delay tactics by the DOJ.
They were supposed to deliver the
documents to Congress Thursday and then
at the last second did what they always do:
38
fail to keep their commitment. Now they are
waiting until the opening of the North Korea
summit in an attempt to bury it from the
public.”
Here we have — again — the Sessions Justice Department
deciding what it will and will not allow members of
Congress (who have constitutional oversight) see
documents they are not only cleared to see but entitled to
see.
And where the hell is Jeff Sessions? Why do we keep
having to ask that question?
For that matter, where is Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein?
He’s the one now responsible for all things Russia.
POTUS Trump could end this today. He could pick up the
phone and order these documents released and, if
necessary, declassified.
And then he could fire these quislings for thwarting a
legitimate investigation into the Deep State operation
aimed at him.
 New FBI Emails Wreck Official Clinton Timeline
Judicial Watch POSTED 16 PAGES OF NEWLY RELEASED Justice Department
DOCUMENTS ABOUT THE INFAMOUS Lynch/Clinton TARMAC MEETING
BY Kathryn Blackhurst
Updated 08 Jun 2018 AT 6:20 Am
A July 2016 email from FBI agent Peter Strzok suggests
bureau insiders discussed the conclusion of its
investigation into 2016 Democratic presidential nominee
Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as early as
April 2016 — months before the FBI interviewed Clinton.
“Another Strzok email suggest[s] the
decision on the Clinton email matter has
been under discussion since April 2016 —
three months before then-FBI Director
James Comey announced he would
recommend no prosecution,” the nonprofit
government watchdog Judicial Watch
revealed Thursday.
Clinton’s use of her private email server to conduct official
Department of State business and the FBI’s investigation
cast a cloud over her 2016 campaign against President
Donald Trump. After exonerating her in July 2016, former
FBI Director James Comey reopened the investigation in
late October 2016 — just two weeks before Election Day
— before closing it again and exonerating her again only
days before the election.
The email from Strzok resulted from an email chain
discussing former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s
decision to recuse herself from the Clinton probe after an
Arizona journalist exposed her secret meeting in late June
2016 with former President Bill Clinton on a Phoenix
airport tarmac. Lynch subsequently claimed she and
Clinton discussed only family matters, including
grandchildren.
Strzok wrote on July 1,
39
“Note that this has been under discussion
since April part. Timings [sic] not great, but
what are you going to do?”
Bureau agents interviewed Hillary Clinton as part of the
probe on July 2, 2016. Three days later, Comey announced
he would not recommend charges against her. Lynch
confirmed on July 6 that the Department of Justice (DOJ)
wouldn't pursue charges against Clinton.
Judicial Watch released 16 pages of FBI documents
pertaining to the tarmac meeting that highlighted Strzok's
involvement in the matter.
Strzok served as the FBI's chief of the counterespionage
section during its investigation into Clinton. He also led
the bureau's 2016 investigation into Russia's election
interference and was appointed the bureau's deputy
assistant director of the counterintelligence division.
Special counsel Robert Mueller named Strzok in July 2017
as one of the top officials in the probe of allegations of
collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russians.
But Mueller removed Strzok in August 2017 after his anti-
Trump text messages with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page
first surfaced. Page resigned from the FBI in May amid
heightened scrutiny.
"These emails are astonishing, no wonder
the FBI hid them from Judicial Watch and
the court," Judicial Watch President Tom
Fitton said in a statement Thursday. "They
show anti-Trump, pro-Clinton FBI agent
Peter Strzok admitting the decision not to
prosecute the Clinton email issue was
 made back in April 2016 — long before
even Hillary Clinton was interviewed."
"And the new emails show that the FBI
security had the political objective of
protecting then-Director Comey from
'embarrassment' — which is, frankly,
disturbing," Fitton added.
The documents Judicial Watch obtained included an email
from an unidentified FBI official sent after the tarmac
meeting with the subject line,
"Media Reports Not for Dissemination."
The official emphasized,
"Our job is to protect the boss from
harm and embarrassment."
.
40
"What issues are currently being reported
in the media? And what actions/
interactions /situations that the Director
may be in could impact them," the official
wrote, noting that the bureau should focus
on these issues.
"The official then cites an example of a
public relations disaster near-miss when
Comey's plane 'literally just missed
Clinton's plane' when they flew into the
White Plains, New York, airport (HPN) a
few months earlier, and saying, 'Imagine
the optics and the awkward situation we
would have put the director in [had] we ...
been at the FBO at the same time as
Secretary Clinton,'" Judicial Watch noted.
 Issa Contends Comey’s
‘Insubordination’ Justified His Firing
Congressman Says The Former FBI Head's Behavior Was 'More Than
Sufficient To Show He Should Have Been Terminated'
By Kathryn Blackhurst
Updated 08 Jun 2018 At 6:36 AM

Issa, former chairman and current member of the House

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, reacted
to ABC News’ Wednesday report citing “sources familiar
with a draft report on the matter,” with one of the sources’
claiming the report accused Comey of being
“insubordinate.” None of the sources were named.

Trump’s firing of Comey has been a focal point of special

counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of allegations
members of Trump’s 2016 campaign colluded with
Russian interests in an attempt to influence the outcome of
the election.

Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG)

Michael Horowitz’s much-anticipated report shows James
Comey’s “insubordination” and “belligerent attitude”
entirely justified President Donald Trump’s decision to fire
the former FBI director, according to Rep. Darrell Issa (R-
Calif.).

“Well, what we make of [the report] is that

there was insubordination or belligerent,
arrogant attitude by the FBI director, and
that pattern continued,” Issa said Thursday
on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom.”
“These kinds of actions, in addition to
breaking protocol both starting and
stopping and announcing the Hillary Clinton
activity, all of those show an arrogance
that, by definition, is not befitting the
director of the FBI,” Issa said.
Issa was referring to information from the draft report
leaked Wednesday, either from the IG’s staff or, more
likely, from one of the individuals assessed in the report.
Such individuals are always allowed to review the specific
sections of IG reports in which they are mentioned.
The IG report is expected to be an exhaustive analysis of
how DOJ and the FBI conducted key investigations,
including the probe into 2016 Democratic presidential
nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to
conduct official business as secretary of state.
41
Although Trump cited Comey's conduct during the Russia
probe among the grounds for firing him in May 2017, the
president also cited Comey's improper handling of the
initial Clinton email investigation and his decision to
reopen it publicly just a few days before Election Day.
Issa urged caution, however, when he
noted that IG report drafts often are "as
strong as they're going to be when you first
see them" before investigators "water them
down" with "softer edges" following
explanations from those under review.
"But the reality is, this is an indictment of
the behavior of Comey more than sufficient
to show he should have been terminated,"
Issa said of the upcoming IG report.
"What we do realize is that [Comey]
serve[d] at the pleasure of the president.
And if in fact he's arrogant, if in fact he's
insubordinate, if in fact he has a double
 standard for Hillary and against Trump, all
of those things are reason to terminate
him," Issa emphasized.
"A lot of what this IG report is going to
show is that he was properly terminated as
somebody who really shouldn't be on the
job," Issa added. "I think that's probably the
most important thing that's going to come
out of it."
Former New Jersey Judge Andrew Napolitano, a senior
judicial analyst for Fox News, said Thursday on that
station's "Fox & Friends" that he had
.
42
"to caution against attempting to evaluate
the IG report on the basis of snippets that
have been leaked." Nevertheless,
Napolitano said, "Insubordination is not
what we are looking for. We are looking for
lawbreaking."
Napolitano asked
"Did [Comey] lie under oath when he gave
different versions of events, events
involving [former FBI Deputy Director]
Andrew McCabe? And we are looking for
very serious, probably politically motivated
errors of judgment, like, 'We can't
prosecute Mrs. Clinton for espionage
because we can't prove intent.' Wait a
minute, Jim, the statute doesn't require to
you prove intent. You can convict under
this statute on the basis of gross
negligence."
Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired McCabe in March,
only hours before he was scheduled to retire with a full
pension. But Sessions acted after another Horowitz report
documented that McCabe lied four times to federal
investigators and Comey about leaking information to The
Wall Street Journal about the Clinton probe.
 KEY EVIDENCE GOES MISSING: Server Belonging To
Wasserman Shultz IT Worker Imran Awan Is Physically
Stolen From Congress
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 7:38 Am
Imran Awan worked for Debbie
Wasserman Schultz for thirteen years
since she came into office in 2004 as a
Florida representative.
Imran and his two Pakistani brothers managed the IT
affairs for several Democratic government officials. They
were relieved of their duties in February 2017 on suspicion
that they accessed specific computer networks without
permission, also known as hacking.
Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were
barred from computer networks at the
House of Representatives in February
2017.
Imran Awan was married to two women at once, including
his first cousin, as is his country’s custom.
Imran had his court case rescheduled recently until next
month.
Imran Awan and his wife Alvi reportedly
struck a plea deal this week.
Daily Caller investigative journalist Luke Rosiak joined
Lou Dobbs on Wednesday to discuss the latest in the
Imran Awan Pakistani hacking scandal.
43
In his interview Wednesday night Luke Rosiak mentioned
that Attorney General Jeff Sessions is refusing to bring up
charges against Wasserman Shultz’s IT expert Imran
Awan.
Now this…
The Awan brothers’ server with much of the key evidence
to the case has gone missing.
The Epoch Times reported:
In a behind-closed-door briefing to the
House leadership in September 2016, the
inspector general said their activity was
suspicious in part because the IT workers
had taken steps to conceal their identities.
“Excessive logons are an indication that the
server is being used for nefarious purposes
and elevated the risk that individuals could
be reading and/or removing information,”
reads a presentation by the inspector
general that was not released to the public.
The inspector general also warned of the risk that the
server could be used as a repository to store documents
“taken from other offices or evidence of
other illicit activity.”
The investigation had uncovered Dropbox accounts
installed on at least two Democratic Caucus computers
used by the IT workers, against House IT policy.
The two accounts associated with the Dropbox accounts on
the computers each contained thousands of files.
“We have not been permitted to view
content of the files on these workstations.
However, based on the file names, some of
the information is likely sensitive,” the
presentation says.
The inspector general also warned House leadership that
the accounts could have been used to exfiltrate
information.
“While file-sharing sites, such as Dropbox,
have legitimate business purposes, use of
such sites is also a classic method for
insiders to exfiltrate data from an
organization.”
Server Goes Missing
Following a second briefing in late September 2016, in
which the House inspector warned the House leadership of
“continuing unauthorized access,” the investigation was
moved to the Capitol Police in October.
.
44
It was not until months later, on Feb. 2, 2017, that the
House sergeant at arms banned the IT workers from the
House network.
The Democratic Caucus server, which
had been identified by the inspector
general as ground zero of the
suspicious activity, had disappeared at
that time.
Three senior government officials with
knowledge of the situation told the Daily
Caller News Foundation last year that it
had been physically stolen.
 HUGE: Fired FBI Deputy Director McCabe
Believed To Have CHANGED 302 Forms
To Entrap FLYNN
Posted On June 8, 2018

(National Sentinel) Busted: In recent days reports surfaced
that fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who has
been criminally referred to the U.S. attorney in
Washington by DoJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz
for allegedly lying to investigators, is seeking use
immunity before providing testimony to Congress.
The reasons are clear:
McCabe has information that will
incriminate him if he talks without first being
granted immunity from prosecution.
If he doesn’t get it, his lawyer Michael Bromwich said in a
letter to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles
Grassley, R-Iowa, that McCabe will simply plead the Fifth
Amendment.
Now, new information has surfaced that sheds further light
on why McCabe may be looking for a ‘get out of jail free’
card.
First, a little backstory.
In a May letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Grassley noted,
“According to that agent’s
contemporaneous notes, [fired FBI]
Director Comey specifically told us during
that briefing that the FBI agents who
interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, ‘saw
nothing that led them to believe [he was]
lying.’ Our own Committee staff’s notes
indicate that Mr. Comey said the ‘agents
saw no change in his demeanor or tone
that would say he was being untruthful.’”
Grassley was demanding that the officials send him and his
committee unredacted Flynn-related documents including
the form 302 — summary notes from Flynn’s interview —
that agents customarily submit as part of their report when
interviewing witnesses and/or suspects.
So, by Comey’s own admission, the agents never believed
that Flynn lied to them. That would have been reflected in
their 302s, right?

Not if they altered by someone with oversight of the case

You may recall Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s
and who would be in a position to change what was filed.
first national security advisor. The retired U.S. Army
lieutenant general was fired by the president in February
2017 — less than a month after POTUS Trump was Someone like McCabe.
inaugurated — for allegedly lying to Vice President Mike
Pence about contact he had with Russia’s ambassador to As reported by investigative journalist Paul Sperry via
the U.S. Twitter on Thursday,

Flynn was later indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller “Senate investigators suspect Gen. Flynn’s
for lying to FBI investigators who came to speak to him in 302s were edited by McCabe, referred
January 2017 before Trump was inaugurated. Flynn did matter to IG Horowitz.”
not know at the time that the interview was part of a
counterintelligence probe (all tied to “Spygate” we would
later learn) so he had no legal counsel present.

At the end of the interview, the agents — demoted FBI

counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and agent Joe
Pientka — reported back to McCabe that they thought
Flynn was being honest with them, that he had not lied.

Boom.
45
But it gets even worse — and more corrupt.
Just days ago reports surfaced that McCabe and Comey
cleared former acting Attorney General Sally Yates —
who was fired by Trump for refusing to defend his first
travel ban — to use the altered 302 when she briefed
White House Counsel on why Flynn ought to be fired.
It was a set up the entire time. And it now appears, if
Sperry’s sources are right, that McCabe legally altered the
302 report to ensnare the very first in what was no doubt
hoped to be a long line of Trump officials.
46
Why did Flynn plead guilty if he was innocent? How do
dispute a forged FBI document in court without
corroborating witnesses?
No wonder McCabe wants to make a deal with the Senate
Judiciary Committee.
Grassley has been attempting to get a lot of this
information for a long time. He should pass on this ‘offer’
and force McCabe to testify under oath — in a court of
law.
A version of this story also appears at NewsTarget.
 MSNBC Hack Nicolle Wallace Questions If
Melania And Ivanka Trump Are
‘Dead Inside’ Or ‘Paid Off’
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 8, 2018, 8:51 Am

“What do they do on a day like today?”

Wallace asked. “Are they just the most
stoic human beings, are they numb, are
they dead inside, are they paid off?”
“Yes, yes, and yes,” Fox replied. “Ivanka
Trump is the most masterful
compartmentalizer that America haas
maybe ever seen. She is able to separate
those things in a way that you and I
probably can’t understand.”

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace asked whether or not Ivanka Wallace recently raised eyebrows when she advocated for
Trump or First Lady Melania Trump are “dead inside” or the strangling of Press Secretary Sarah Sanders.
“paid off” during a segment on Thursday.

The panel was discussing Rudy Giuliani speaking on

Stormy Daniels and saying that he does not respect a
woman “who sells her body for sexual exploitation.”

“He may not have shared these views

about these specific women,” Fox said.
“But the way that the president talks about
women and behaves towards women, it’s
not so out of line with what Rudy Giuliani
said, and, what he said about Stormy
Daniels was disgusting, gave me a pit in
my stomach from the second I woke up this
morning, but my first reaction was, this is
so disrespectful to the first lady,” Vanity
Fair reporter Emily Jane Fox said.

The fake concern about respecting our First Lady did not
last long, however.
47
 NYT Reporter Blamed ‘Trumpster
Lawyers’ For Leaks. Turns Out It Was Her Boyfriend.
Federal Investigators Subpoenaed Records From The New York Times' Ali Watkins
And Charged Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer James Wolfe
With Crimes Related To Leaking.
By NTK Staff
06.08.2018 @9:00am

Federal investigators seized the records of New York Times

reporter Ali Watkins in relation to an investigation of leaks
out of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI),
the Times reported Thursday night.

In the investigation, the Department of Justice charged

Watkins’ 58-year old ex-boyfriend, SSCI Director of
Security James Wolfe.

The Times identified Watkins as “REPORTER #2” in the

indictment, which details a three-year personal relationship
between the two:

48
The indictment also details extensive contact between notified the reporter of upcoming SSCI appearances by
Watkins and Wolfe that immediately preceded the Trump associates, including Carter Page.
publication of classified materials. Wolfe allegedly

49
It’s interesting, then, that Watkins essentially blamed
“Trumpster lawyers” for leaks in September, tweeting that
they were revealing their own appearances.

Not only did it turn out to be the committee doing the

leaking, Watkins knew the person doing the leaking on an
intimate level.

UPDATE: Watkins has some interesting tweets.

.

50
 Liberal Media Claims Senate Staffer Who Leaked
Anti-Trump Info To His NY Times Lover Is “Bipartisan”
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 9:09 Am

Former Senate Intel Committee aide, James A. Wolfe, 57,

was arrested on Thursday after the DOJ conducted an
investigation into classified information leaks to reporters.

Wolfe repeatedly lied to investigators about his contacts

with reporters and made false statements to the FBI.

The Justice Department also seized New York Times

reporter, Ali Watkins years’ worth of phone and email
records.

But here are the leaked reports Wolfe gave to his lover Ali
Watkins.

James Wolfe (NBC) Via Jordan Schachtel:

The New York Times insisted James Wolfe was bipartisan. Senate panel expects to receive Clinton
campaign documents this week

Senate panel investigating Russia

outraged by Comey firing

51
 Carter Page says he won’t testify before
Senate Intelligence panel in Russia
probe

And Wolfe’s colleague Daniel Jones

went to work for Fusion GPS.

Senate Intelligence Committee

subpoenas Flynn

As Jeff Giesea says,

“To review Ali Watkins’s work is to

watch the Trump collusion narrative
develop in slow motion.”
.

52
 PAYDIRT: Senate Intelligence Committee Aide BUSTED
For Leaking To NY Times Reporter
Posted On June 8, 2018
(National Sentinel) Justice: Last fall Attorney General Jeff
Sessions warned that the Justice Department would be
cracking down on leakers.
President Donald Trump repeated that threat in May after
someone leaked disparaging comments a now-fired White
House staffer made about ailing Sen. John McCain of
Arizona.
“The so-called leaks coming out of the
White House are a massive over
exaggeration put out by the Fake News
Media in order to make us look as bad as
possible. With that being said, leakers are
traitors and cowards, and we will find out
who they are!” the president tweeted.
These are no longer merely threats.
As reported by The New York Times, former Senate Intel
Committee aide, James A. Wolfe, 57, was arrested
Thursday after the DoJ conducted an investigation into
classified information leaks to reporters.
Wolfe, reports said, lied repeatedly to FBI investigators
and others about his contact with reporters. He also made
false statements.
In addition, the Justice Department seized years’ worth of
phone records from one Times reporter, Ali Watkins, with
whom Wolfe was having a romantic relationship.
53
The Times noted:
Mr. Wolfe, the Intelligence Committee’s
director of security, was slated to appear
before a federal judge on Friday in
Washington. Reached on Thursday
evening before his arrest, Mr. Wolfe
declined to comment.
Mr. Wolfe’s case led to the first known
instance of the Justice Department going
after a reporter’s data under President
Trump. The seizure was disclosed in a
letter to the Times reporter, Ali Watkins,
who had been in a three-year relationship
with Mr. Wolfe. The seizure suggested that
prosecutors under the Trump
administration will continue the aggressive
tactics employed under President Barack
Obama.
In his role with the committee, Mr. Wolfe
was responsible for safeguarding classified
and other sensitive information shared with
lawmakers. He stopped performing
committee work in December and retired in
May.
Court documents describe Mr. Wolfe’s
communications with four reporters —
including Ms. Watkins — using encrypted
messaging applications. It appeared that
the F.B.I. was investigating how Ms.
Watkins learned that Russian spies in 2013
had tried to recruit Carter Page, a former
Trump foreign policy adviser.
She published an article for BuzzFeed
News on April 3, 2017, about the attempted
recruitment of Mr. Page in which he
confirmed the contacts.
Watkins is a former national security reporter for Buzzfeed
and Politico.
 Evidence Of General Flynn Lying
To Investigators Was Reportedly Destroyed
By Andrew McCabe
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 10:05 Am

As Cristina Laila noted yesterday, TGP

previously reported in February, that
fired FBI Director McCabe altered far left
FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s 302
notes on his interview with General
Michael Flynn.

Reports are now circling that not only

did corrupt former FBI Head McCabe
alter the 302 regarding the interview
with General Flynn that later was used
to get Flynn fired and indicted by the
corrupt Mueller team, McCabe and
his corrupt gang also destroyed
the supporting documentation
for the 302. No wonder corrupt DOJ Deputy AG Rosenstein is not
providing these documents to the Senate. They’ve all been
destroyed. Also, Mueller’s team may not be doing the
Internet sleuths are again at it. New reports are out
same which was ordered by Judge Sullivan in the Flynn
suspecting that corrupt and fired former FBI Head McCabe
case. This would appear to be grounds to drop charges
destroyed evidence that General Flynn was innocent and
against Flynn.
did not lie to FBI agents when interviewed shortly after the
2017 Inauguration. Flynn was later indicted by the corrupt
and conflicted Mueller team.

Some on the free Internet (i.e. not the MSM) also point out
that one of Mueller’s gang, Andrew Weissmann, did the
same thing years ago in the government’s case against
Enron.

54

Corrupt and fired former DOJ AG Sally Yates destroyed
evidence in the past as well. She is the one who went to the
White House and complained that General Flynn had lied.
55
General Flynn’s innocence cannot be
declared soon enough. He and his
family have gone through so much due
to these horrible corrupt human beings.
These goons who set him up need to be
brought to justice. Drain the Swamp!
 Trump’s Saving Grace
By Andrew Levine
June 8, 2018
What a nauseating spectacle — the language police at
CNN and MSNBC castigating Samantha Bee for calling
Ivanka Trump a “feckless cunt!”
Their producers should have told them that if truth isn’t a
defense, it ought to be, and that prissiness über alles is for
self-righteous prigs.
She said “feckless,” not, as was sometimes reported,
“fucking.” Part of the confusion may be that on those
liberal (actually centrist) networks, “the f-word,” like “the
c-word,” is routinely spelled out when mentioned at all.
I wonder whether this is because the network bosses are
worried that c-h-i-l-d-r-e-n might be watching.
Apologies to Kinky Friedman for that; it is a relief, in
times like these, to think of the immortal Kinkster.
It could all change in the blink of an eye, should the T-
word give the Saudis and the Israelis the war against Iran
that they yearn for, but, for the time being, George W.
Bush is still Number One in one respect: he has done more
harm in the Middle East even than Donald Trump.
On the whole, though, it has been clear since November
2016 that W would hold “the worst president ever” title for
no more than eight years. With Trump’s election, he has
found his level; he is a Number Two.
Trump’s idea of good taste is a parody of a fifties Playboy
reader’s. W’s tastes are more refined. He is even able to
appreciate Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jew Boys.
Trump doesn’t have enough humanity for that. The only
Friedman he can appreciate is David – his bankruptcy
56
lawyer and the former head of American Friends of Bet El
(a rabidly reactionary orthodox settlement on the Occupied
West Bank). Trump’s Friedman is now the U.S.
ambassador to Israel.
There is an Ivanka connection in this as well. Her in-laws,
the Kushners, contribute to that “charity” as well.
Meanwhile, the Don has lately become a Roseanne Barr
fan. That is telling too.
Up through the 2012 election, Roseanne was something of
a working class hero. She always seemed to have a few
screws loose in her head, but it is only since she was
denied the Green Party nomination for president in 2012
that she has adopted the public persona of an unhinged
crazy lady – or, what comes to the same thing, a racist
conspiracy theorist and supporter of Donald Trump.
With Trump, it is all about celebrity. How then could he
resist Roseanne? Before Mickey Mouse gave her the boot,
her ratings in the TV wasteland that Trump inhabits were
spectacular. He therefore liked her back.
Roseanne’s racist rant landed in the same news cycle as
Samantha Bee’s on point characterization of Princess
Ivanka. Because timing is all, the cable news “journalists”
and their counterparts in print media grouped the two
together.
Obviously, the symmetry they discerned between the two
cases is absurd, but let that pass. The larger point is that
Ivanka, her husband — and, for that matter, her feckless
prick brothers — deserve all the abuse that falls their way.
Decorum be damned; if a Trump-style potty mouth helps
drive home the point, then bring it on!
And show no mercy! Call out that shallow fashionista for
what she is: a purveyor of baubles and schmatas to like-
minded airheads with more money than taste!
Remember too that her father deserves verbal abuse ten
times more and, with him, that is just the least of it.
That what he says and does is reported on respectfully and
that purportedly serious journalists report on his tweets and
on the nonsense that spews out of his mouth as if there
might be a thought worth considering in any of it is
nauseating too.
The office he occupies is the reason to care about what he
says or does; the only reason. On the merits, there is no
reason at all.
Even so, and despite the fact that Roseanne is a vile nut
job, that ridiculous woman is not entirely off base in
thinking that Ivanka’s father might have been a better
choice for working class non-heroes than the alternative he
ran against.
There are, after all, matters of very great importance on
which Hillary Clinton and Democrats like her could
arguably be deemed worse.
***
Does this mean that the Donald has some redeeming
features, notwithstanding his obvious moral and
intellectual shortcomings and his buffoonish demeanor?
The short answer is No.
However, in view of the very un-democratic institutions
that our “founding fathers” bequeathed us, and the
durability of the duopoly party system that afflicts our
political culture, the issue is a little bit more complicated
than that.
Favoring Trump over Clinton was wrong-headed but not
entirely unreasonable two years ago, given the parameters
within which the choice had to be made.
In light of what has now been proven beyond a reasonable
doubt about what a Trump presidency entails, Trump
supporters are on even shakier ground than they used to be.
But with the mainstream Democratic Party still basically
unchanged, their position is not insane.
Clinton’s flirtations with World War III were more
troubling than Trump’s – at least in the sense that her
choice of enemies was more reckless. Now she is more or
less out of the picture, but her legacy lives on; getting a
new Cold War up and running has become a top
Democratic Party priority.
Needless to say, Democrats aren’t the only problem;
Republicans are inveterate Cold Warriors too.
Communism is gone, but habits of mind associated with
Cold War anti-Communism have somehow survived.
Lately, they have begun again to thrive.
For that, give blame where blame is due. In much the way
that the Trump campaign legitimized “America first”
jingoism and white supremacist attitudes, the Clinton
57
campaign revived and legitimated Cold War mindsets and
assumptions.
Trump seemed to be, and for the most part has been, less
bad. Unlike leading Democrats and their media flunkies at
CNN and MSNBC, Cold War revivalism has never been
his passion.
No doubt, the reasons why are as sleazy as the man
himself. Even so, the country and the world should be
grateful that they move him.
Common sense is on Trump’s side – why needlessly stir
up animosities directed at an adversary with nuclear
weapons and the means to deliver them? But common
sense does not move the Donald; he has none. He has no
principled convictions either. What he has are vile instincts
and TV shows that he likes.
Trump’s business dealings have always been dodgy; and,
despite his boasting, his deal making is about as artful as
any garden-variety mob boss’s. Meanwhile, in the art of
blackmail, Russia’s intelligence services are superb. Thus
it is possible, even likely, that Russia has something on
him.
Or, since, venality trumps prudence in Trumpland, there
may be something he wants Russia to do for him that he is
too foolhardy or too stupid entirely to conceal.
Whatever the reason, to the extent that Trump has been
keeping the Doomsday Clock from edging closer to
midnight, then hooray for him. If Clintonites and other
Cold War enthusiasts don’t like it, too bad for them.
There is something else that Trump has been doing that the
foreign policy establishment along with the entire political
class, the ruling class, respectable media, and, the general
public don’t care for in the least, and that, were he more
lucid, Trump would oppose as well: he is overturning the
American dominated world order established in the
aftermath of the Second World War.
“Not,” as the saying goes, “that there is anything wrong
with that,” quite to the contrary. But there are bad, indeed
dangerous, ways of going about it. Count on Trump to find
them.
For more than seven decades, the United States has been
an economic and military hegemon. Since the demise of
the Soviet Union, its position has been essentially
unchallenged. Now, to the dismay of nearly all concerned
parties, at home and abroad, Trump is undoing the
framework upon which American world domination rests.
The result is turbulence at a global level; not only, as in the
past, in the hinterlands and in hard to manage regions, but
within the empire’s core.
This was bound to happen eventually; empires rise and
fall. But the American empire was still hanging in there
when Trump came on the scene, and there was, and still is,
no replacement waiting in the wings. There is no stable
system of alliances capable of imposing order in world
affairs, and there is no alternative global hegemon.
There is, of course, the United Nations and, along with it,
many more international organizations than a century ago.
But they all kowtow to the United States, and are therefore
useless for doing anything that the empire’s stewards
oppose. Anything even remotely resembling a world
government is as out of the question now as it ever was.
When Madeleine Albright and Barack Obama and others
would blabber on about America being “the indispensable
nation,” what they had in mind was hypocritical nonsense;
America was hardly a moral exemplar for the world.
There is a sense, however, in which their words were
literally true. For better or worse (generally worse),
American power has kept uncontrollable instability at bay.
In principle, of course, there are more effective and just
ways to assure world order. In practice, however, they lie
beyond reach.
This is a tragedy even for the United States. Led wisely,
the hegemon could be brought down gently. But when has
the United States been wisely led?
Wise leadership would make it easier for Americans to
address pressing problems inside “the homeland;” it would
also free up energy and resources for experiments in
governance and in living that could help move humanity
forward.
The United States has not done much of that lately; the
Cold War put the kybosh on the very idea.
How ironic, therefore, that by “making America great
again,” Trump, the least wise leader America has ever
known, is bringing the empire down.
This would be to his credit, but for the fact that his
stupidity and ineptitude are bound to exact a toll. The
chances that anything good will come of Trump’s bull in a
china shop approach are nil.
Needless to say, bringing the empire down is not
something Trump has chosen to do; he probably does not
even realize that he is doing anything of the kind. He may
even sincerely believe that he is “making America great
58
again” – not understanding that, in the jingoistic sense that
is all he knows, he has been doing just the opposite.
This is what happens when a septuagenarian with an
adolescent’s mind is elected president, and proceeds to act
out.
***
Whatever Trump may say or think, the main beneficiary of
the world order now in place is the United States.
American capitalists, especially those involved with
finance, have been making out like the bandits they are.
Unless Trump’s machinations set off a major economic
slump, many of them will likely continue to prosper, at
least for a while. It is not impossible too that some workers
will be better off in the short run from, say, Trump’s tariffs
on aluminum and steel. But most Americans will be worse
off, as will most people in other countries. The world’s
economies are closely intertwined; being run over by a bull
in a china shop is the last thing they need.
Mindlessly tearing the existing system apart, without clear
alternatives in mind and without giving any thought to
changing the fundamentals of the underlying economic
structure, makes no sense. It is a recipe for disaster.
Trump’s trade policies, like his economic policies
generally, are political theater. They exist so that Trump, a
serial promise-breaker and conman, can tell his marks that
he keeps his campaign promises. If the gods are kind, as
they almost never are, his machinations will backfire, as
they inevitably will eventually, in time to cause him harm.
It is the same with the geopolitical aspects of Trump’s
assault on the American empire.
America’s days as a global hegemon are numbered, but
that number is not yet up. The hegemon is in peril now
only because America has a president who is ignorant,
arrogant, and inept.
Republicans don’t like this any more than Democrats do.
Serving more or less the same masters, why would they?
But, they go along. Fearing the wrath of the most
intractable of Hillary’s “deplorables,” they seek safety by
hiding under Trump’s tiny thumb.
Trump’s attacks on American dominance of the world
economy are unintended; he knows not what he does.
His attacks on America’s political domination of the world
are different; he knows precisely what he is doing – he is
tapping into his bases’ and his own small-minded
jingoism. The disingenuous “America first” jibber-jabber
that enshrouds his machinations only serve to demonstrate
what a conman he is.
A genuine left opposition would also be working to bring
the era of American world domination to an end. But,
again, everything depends on how it comes to pass.
Laudable internationalist ways are one thing, Trump’s
national chauvinist way is something else altogether. Any
resemblance between what passes for foreign policy under
him and what American foreign policy ought to be is, as
they say, “purely coincidental.”
***
Trump has not quite destroyed the Republican Party,
though there is still a fighting chance that he will.
However, he has dealt a severe blow to the GOP’s free
market theology, to the idea that, for every earthly
problem, there is a market-based cure.
That belief is deeply entrenched in Republican minds.
Even those who care more about making the country more
godly or about law and order (repressing minorities and the
poor, not the TV show), or balanced budgets, or old
fashioned Country Club values, are still, with varying
degrees of commitment, free marketeers.
Without quite making such a show of it, Democrats are on
board with that too.
Of course, they don’t really believe in it – not
wholeheartedly. If nothing else, they are all “military
Keynesians,” they all use military spending to boost
effective demand. And the Pentagon budget, which they all
consider sacrosanct, functions as a back door, dangerously
skewed and deeply flawed, industrial policy
But the faith in markets that they all evince to some extent
does have consequences. They are especially evident in the
policy prescriptions of such Republican stars as Rand Paul,
Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz (of whom it has been said that
the word “loathsome” is joined to his name in the way that
“fleet-footed” is joined to Achilles’). And they were rife in
the pre-Trump GOP.
No longer; in the Republican mind, the invisible hand of
the almighty market has given way to the visible hand of
Donald Trump.
59
Republicans now follow Trump and Trump believes in his
heart of hearts that, on any and all matters of national
import, the Donald knows best.
If the coal industry cannot withstand market forces, Trump
will see to it that the government keeps it alive. The steel
industry too; if it cannot compete with foreign producers,
then bring the tariffs on!
The pundits don’t care for this at all, but their explanations
ring hollow. Their line is that Trump is keeping promises
he made during his presidential campaign. At Fox, they
think this is as it should be; the centrists at CNN and
MSNBC disagree.
However, as is par for the course, they are both wrong: the
very idea of promise keeping, when inconvenient, is
beyond Trump’s ken.
An impartial observer could hardly fail to notice that a
common theme of many of the policies that emanate out of
the blooming buzzing confusion that engulfs the Trump
White House is opposition to efforts to protect against
environmental degradation. It is as if Trump wants to
accelerate global warming and to hasten the onset of
environmental catastrophes. His repudiation early on of the
Paris Climate Accord was emblematic, and a taste of
things to come.
In the White House now, the mark of energy sector
capitalists is everywhere. It would give Trump too much
credit to say that he agrees with, or even cares about, their
arguments, such as they are. What he cares about is their
money. And so he acts against market “logic.”
This is bad news, of course, because his policies are even
more harmful than those that market logic would dictate,
but, in at least one respect, there is a silver lining. Trump’s
whims are dealing free market theology a blow – not a
mortal blow, the doctrine is resilient — but a serious defeat
nevertheless.
To the extent that this makes Republicans like Ted Cruz
apoplectic — and disquiets Mike Pence, the next
catastrophe in line — then bravo Trump. This may not be
much of a saving grace, but it is better than nothing at all.
 IRANIAN REGIME Parades Giant Effigy Of President
Trump With Noose Around His Neck On Al Quds Day
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 10:47 Am

in 1979 to express support for the Palestinians and oppose

Zionism and Israel.

The protesters also chanted “Death to

Israel.”

On Al-Quds Day in Iran the regime

paraded an giant effigy of President
Donald Trump in an Israeli T-shirt with a
giant noose around his neck.

Via Banafsheh Zand:

The Iranian regime torched Trump.

Quds Day is an annual event held on the last Friday of

Ramadan that was initiated by the Islamic Republic of Iran

60
 They REALLY hate President Trump.
.

61
 Breaking: TRUMP Likely To
Support Ending Ban On Marijuana (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 11:08 Am

“I really do. I support Senator Gardner. I

know exactly what he’s doing. We’re
looking at it. But I probably will end up
supporting that, yes.”

The bill, the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment

Entrusting States (STATES) Act, would amend the federal
Controlled Substances Act to exempt state-legal marijuana
activity from its provisions.

It would also protect banks that work with legal cannabis

businesses and legalize industrial hemp.

Far out.
President Trump spoke with reporters
on Friday before departing to the much
anticipated G7 meetings in Canada this
weekend.

Before boarding Marine One President Trump told

reporters he is likely to support ending the ban on
marijuana.

The Marijuana Moment reported:

62
 This is “Bullshit – Fake News” included for balance.
Trump Is About To Get Away With
Gaslighting Us On ‘Spygate’ And
It’s Mostly The Media’s Fault
By John Ziegler
11:17 Am, June 8th, 2018
In many ways, President Donald Trump, despite his many
declarations to the contrary, is not a particularly intelligent
person. In some aspects, however, he is a freaking savant-
like genius.
When it comes to manipulating the news media and getting
away with what should be catastrophic mistakes, there is
simply no one better than Donald J. Trump. The latest
example of this remarkable, if not also reprehensible,
talent is the utterly bull-crap “Spygate” theory which
Trump got from the insane sewers of the right-wing
blogosphere.
In a classic demonstration of how conservative author
Amanda Carpenter has cracked the code of Trump’s
most diabolical lies, the president has clearly engaged in
yet another “gaslighting” episode. He concocted a wild and
nonsensical theory in a desperate attempt to undermine the
Russia investigation, and, to the surprise of no objective
person with a functioning brain, it turned out to all be a big
fat lie.
But unlike some of his past lies intended to sow the seeds
of doubt among the Republican electorate about the
reliability of anything even remotely related to the Russia
investigation (gee, I wonder why a president whose party
controls all levers of the federal government would need to
do such a thing?), this one was exposed fairly quickly and
decisively. Numerous key Republicans in Congress who
have had access to the intelligence on the matter, including
the normally sycophantic Paul Ryan, have publicly
concluded that “Spygate” is a Trump-concocted fantasy.
63
Some have even done so in terms so brutal that it makes
them sound like they could have only been uttered by an
MSNBC host. Quite simply, none of this is the slightest bit
“normal,” even for this Bizarro World known as the
Trump era.
So the President of the United States knowingly made up a
BS conspiracy to impugn our own intelligence agencies,
all to protect himself from the results of a very serious
investigation, and now key members of his own party are
admitting that it was all a big lie. In a sane world, the
political consequences for Trump here would be
calamitous.
However, in the never-ending circus in which we now all
reside, Trump will suffer very little if any real
consequences for this egregious “gaslighting” episode. The
primary reason for this is because the modern news media
is simply incapable of handling these situations in a
manner which causes any other result, and Trump knows
this reality better than anyone.
Especially after pulling off his “Birtherism” charade and
not being forced to be held accountable for that heinous
lie, even in the middle of a presidential campaign, Trump
knows that he simply can’t be harmed when he engages in
this sort of insanity. The media is always at least one step
behind him and by the time they finally catch up, their tiny
attention spans, much like Trump’s own, shift onto
something totally different.
In short, Trump is the Roadrunner and the media is Wile E.
Coyote. Unless they get the guts to definitively call out
Trump as a liar immediately after he begins a
“gaslighting,” this pattern will never change.
Trump can always claim that he was only asking a
question and that he never really said it was true. In fact,
he can even declare victory, just like he did in ludicrous
fashion with “Birtherism,” by virtue of the fact that he
forced an investigation to prove that what he was
suggesting was NOT true.
Trump also knows that once his sham is finally debunked
that most people will have already forgotten about the
original charge and/or won’t even hear about the truth
because the news media is now far too fragmented and
eager to chase after the next big story before their ever-
shrinking audiences tune out. Now that Trump is president,
his banking on the media’s inability to focus on any one
subject long enough for it to reach critical mass is a
foolproof gambit which cannot lose.
After all, now all he has to do in order to distract from a
story he doesn’t like is to tweet something crazy, meet
with Kim Kardashian, pardon a right-wing pundit, float
the pardon of Muhammad Ali, brag about how he is going
to bring peace to Korea, or put Rudy Giuliani on
television. Like cats mesmerized by a spotlight, the media
immediately drops everything else and Trump avoids
defeat.
CNN’s Erin Burnett and a few others have tried to bring
some semblance of accountability for this shameful
.
64
episode, but by Monday, if not sooner, the story will be
“old news” and there will be no great ratings rise to
warrant continuing to cover it. Once again, Trump knows
this, and it is why he never gets badly beaten in this type of
battle.
Last night, in an exception which proves the rule, Tucker
Carlson somehow allowed the truth of “Spygate” to
accidently briefly leak out to the surely horrified and
confused “Cult 45” audience of Fox News. Don’t be
surprised if there is soon a new opening for a booking
producer on that show.
You see, on Fox News in primetime, crazy conspiracy
theories are a lot like toilet paper. They use them to clean
up their mess, and then immediately toss out the refuse the
instant it is no longer useful.
Only the stench remains, but their audience has now been
well trained to believe that scent is actually roses.
 Trump Glad DOJ Caught A Leaker, Looking
Forward To Catching Comey’s ‘Band Of Thieves’
"I'm A Big Believer In The Freedom Of The Press, But I'm Also A
Believer In Classified Information," The President Said.
By NTK Staff
06.08.2018 @11:31am

“I’m a big believer in the freedom of the

press, but I’m also a believer in classified
information,” he said to the press.

Trump named fired FBI Director James “Comey and his

band of thieves” as additional leakers of classified
information. He expressed hope that they would be
brought to justice.

Federal law enforcement charged Senate Intelligence

Committee Director of Security James Wolfe with lying to
investigators related to a leak investigation.
President Trump told reporters on Friday that it was “very
interesting” that federal investigators caught an
“important” leaker, calling it a “terrific thing.”

65
 Trump Sums Up Giuliani’s Time
As His Lawyer in Seven Excruciating Words
by Matt Naham
12:01 pm, June 8th, 2018

sells her body for sexual exploitation I don’t

respect. Tell me what damage she
suffered. Someone who sells his or her
body for money has no good name.”
“If you’re going to sell your body for money,
you just don’t have a reputation. I may be
old fashioned, I dunno,” he said.
“I’m not going to disagree with him on that,”
Trump said Friday.

If you ever want to endorse someone, maybe even
someone who works for you, and come off as sincere
maybe try not to say, “You’re great except for the fact you
are you.” President Donald Trump said something
Friday about Rudy Giuliani that seemed like it was
supposed to be praiseworthy; instead, it reads as an
excruciating assessment of Giuliani’s job performance as
Trump’s attorney up to now.
Giuliani also defended his remarks Thursday, telling CNN
“If you’re a [feminist] and you support the
porn industry, you should turn in your
credentials.”
Daniels’ attorney Michael Avenatti responded by calling
Giuliani a “misogynist.”

“Look, Rudy’s great, but Rudy is Rudy,”

Trump eloquently said all that there was to
be said.

The president continued, however, saying,

“But Rudy is doing a very good job,

actually. He’s doing a very good [job].”

According to CBS News’ White House reporter Jacqueline

Alemany, Trump made the comments in response to a
question about Giuliani’s Israel trip.
Giuliani’s time as Trump’s attorney has been marked by
confusion. There have been times he’s had to walk back
statements. After Giuliani went on TV and said Trump
knew about the $130,000 payment to Daniels and repaid
his lawyer Michael Cohen, the president said that his
lawyer was still new new to the job and would “get his
facts straight.”

Keep in mind, the president denied knowing about the

One of the things Giuliani said was this, about Stormy payment prior to that Fox News appearance in early May.
Daniels:
Flash forward to today and Trump is saying Giuliani is
“I respect women—beautiful women and “great” but he “is Rudy.”
women with value —but a woman who
.
66
 GMA Ignores Report Of Senate
Staffer Leaking Info To NYT Reporter He Dated
By Kristine Marsh
June 8, 2018 1:02 PM EDT
Friday morning, ABC News ignored a story that broke
overnight that revealed how some reporters were using
unethical means to obtain and leak classified information
about the Trump Administration. The Justice Department
announced late Thursday that the former head of the
Senate Intelligence Committee, James Wolfe, was arrested
and indicted for lying to the FBI about his leaking of
information to the media. His primary contact? New York
Times’ reporter Ali Watkins, whom he just happened to
have a three-year romantic relationship with.
While NBC’s Today show and CBS’s This Morning
reported on the story in a straightforward manner, ABC’s
Good Morning America didn’t even have a brief mention
of the story on their two hour program.
Both CBS and NBC led their reports on the story by noting
the White House was “cracking down” on leakers. CBS’s
Jeff Pegues reported that Wolfe had been in contact with at
least three journalists while he was head of the Senate
Intelligence Committee:
Prosecutors say that Wolfe falsely claimed to FBI agents in
an interview in 2017 that that he did not have contact with
reporters. But according to an indictment unsealed late
Thursday, investigators say that he had repeated contact
with at least three reporters between 2015 and 2017.
Both networks noted that the Justice Department had
confirmed that Wolfe was giving information to Times’
reporter Ali Watkins, after seizing her phone and e-mail
records. The Justice Department’s investigation
established a connection between certain stories being
leaked and the dates where Wolfe and Watkins had
exchanged a large number of messages and/or phone calls.
67
Wolfe later admitted to having a three year romantic
relationship with the Times’ reporter.
NBC’s Kristen Welker pointed out the paper defended
their reporter and attacked the Trump Administration.
However she also pointed out that this criticism also faced
the Obama Administration:
But I can tell you, Savannah, The New York Times firing
back this morning, writing, “This decision by the Justice
Department will endanger reporters’ ability to promise
confidentiality to their sources.” Journalism advocacy
groups have been accusing the government of overreach,
going all the way back to the Obama administration.
CBS’ Jeff Pegues also noted that Trump was not the first
president to do this:
Now this is the first known incident that the Department of
Justice has seized a reporter’s data. It is a tactic that the
Obama administration used in the past.
Despite ABC’s shock and horror reaction to any harsh
word said against the intelligence community by President
Trump, they had no interest in a member of the Senate
outright lying to the FBI about leaking potentially
classified information to the media.
Read the transcripts below:
NBC Today
06/08/18
7:00 AM TEASE
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Breaking overnight, leak crackdown.
A long-time Senate staffer indicted on charges of lying to the
FBI and accused of sharing classified information with the
media. Investigators seizing the phone of a New York Times
reporter.
(...)
7:05 AM SEGMENT [7:05:16 - 7:06:16, 1 min]
GUTHRIE: And, Kristen, there’s another big story making waves
this morning, having to do with a leak and a top official on the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Tell us about that.
KRISTEN WELKER: That’s right. That staffer on the Senate
Intel Committee, James Wolfe, has been arrested on charges
of lying to the FBI about intentionally leaking classified
information. Now, investigators have also seized the records
of a New York Time reporter, Allie Watkins. And The New
York Times is reporting the two were having a romantic
relationship. No comment from either side on that allegation.
But I can tell you, Savannah, The New York Times firing back
this morning, writing, “This decision by the Justice
Department will endanger reporters’ ability to promise
confidentiality to their sources.” Journalism advocacy
groups have been accusing the government of overreach,
going all the way back to the Obama administration. So this
will undoubtedly get a lot of attention today, Savannah.
GUTHRIE: Alright, Kristen, with that breaking news, thank you.
...
CBS This Morning
6/8/18
7:07:46 to 7:09:49
NORAH O’DONNELL: The Senate Intelligence Committee’s
former head of security is due in court today, accused of lying to
the FBI about talking with reporters. Fifty-eight-year-old James
Wolfe was arrested yesterday. The FBI says he was in regular
contact with a number of journalists. The New York Times saiys
investigators secretly seized phone and e-mail records from one
.
68
of its reporters. Jeff Pegues is outside the Justice Department.
Jeff, good morning.
JEFF PEGUES: Good morning. James Wolfe’s arrest comes as
the White House is cracking down on leakers. Prosecutors say
that Wolf falsely claimed to FBI agents in an interview in 2017
that that he did not have contact with reporters. But according to
an indictment unsealed late Thursday, investigators say that he
had repeated contact with at least three reporters between 2015
and 2017.
Wolfe’s job as the Director of Security for the Senate Intelligence
Committee gave him access to classified information. The New
York Times reported Thursday that investigators secretly seized
years' worth of phone and e-mail records from reporter
Ali Watkins. The Times reports investigators did not obtain the
content of those messages. The Times says Watkins had a
three-year personal relationship with Wolf before she began
working for the paper in 2017. Now, Watkins denies Wolfe gave
her classified information and her attorney says the seizure of her
data was, in their words, “disconcerting.” Now this is the first
known incident that the Department of Justice has seized a
reporter’s data. It is a tactic that the Obama administration
used in the past. We reached out to James Wolfe for a
comment. We still haven't heard back. If he is convicted in this
case, he could get up to 15 years behind bars. John?
JOHN DICKERSON: Jeff Pegues for us in Washington.
Thanks, Jeff. There’s going to be a lot more coming out of
that story.
O’DONNELL: Yeah. Absolutely. What did they find on all
those seized records from the New York Times reporter who
had this relationship with him?
ALEX WITT: And who are the other reporters?
DICKERSON: Exactly right. And the Justice Department does not
take kindly to lying to the FBI.
WITT: No. It doesn’t.
 BREAKING: Mueller Hits Paul Manafort With
ANOTHER Indictment For ‘Witness Tampering’ After
Raiding His Icloud Account
By Cristina Laila
June 8, 2018, 1:21 Pm
Breaking news.
Trump’s former campaign chairman
Paul Manafort was hit with another
indictment by Robert Mueller Friday for
‘witness tampering.’
CNBC reported:
Special counsel Robert Mueller filed new
witness tampering criminal charges against
ex-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort as
well as Russian citizen Konstantin Kilimnik
as a defendant.
The superseding indictment lodged by a
grand jury sitting in federal court in
Washington, DC, came days after Mueller
asked the judge in Manafort’s case to
revoke his bail and jail him because of an
alleged effort to tamper with witnesses.
.
69
Manafort and Kilimnik were both hit with new charges
accusing them of using intimidation or force against a
witness to obstruct justice, and also with tampering with a
witness, victim or informant.
The Special Counsel accused Trump’s
former campaign chairman Paul
Manafort of attempting to tamper with
potential witnesses, in a court filing
Monday.
Dirty Cop Mueller raided Manafort’s
iCloud account to obtain phone records
and other documents.
Reuters reported Monday:
The FBI has documents and statements
from the two people, as well as
telephone records and documents
recovered through a search of
Manafort’s iCloud account showing that
Trump’s former campaign manager
attempted communication while he was
out on bail, according to Domin.
The communications were “in an effort to influence their
testimony and to otherwise conceal evidence,” Domin
wrote. “The investigation into this matter is ongoing.”
This story is developing…please refresh page for updates.
 AP Goes ‘Melania Conspiracy’ Over
Pres. Trump’s Update On First Lady’s Health
By Kristinn Taylor
June 8, 2018, 1:40 Pm

Maybe she should follow LBJ’s

example? Melania did not accompany her husband on the trip. The
President said to the press,

““First lady’s great–right there (pointing at

the White House). She has to, and she
wanted to go, can’t fly for one month, the
doctors say. She had a big operation! That
was a close to a four-hour operation. And
uh, she’s doing great. Right there. And you
know what? She’s a great First Lady.”

President Lyndon Johnson shows reporters

his gall bladder surgery scar, October 20, 1965.

The Associated Press and one of its White House

reporters, Darlene Superville, raised conspiratorial doubts
about the health of First Lady Melania Trump after her
husband President Donald Trump gave the press an update
on her health Friday morning as he left the White House
for the G7 summit in Quebec, saying Trump’s comments
added “mystery” and “intrigue” to the situation.

Melania spent five days at the military’s Walter Reed

National Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland in May,
recuperating from a kidney procedure. Hospitals try to
discharge patients as soon as possible due to the risk of
infection, so a five day stay is an indication of a serious
procedure.

The AP posted a tweet for Superville’s article that reads,

“The first lady’s office said she’d undergone

a procedure for a benign kidney condition,
but Trump says the first lady isn’t traveling
with him because she had a four-hour
operation and doctors told her not to fly for
a month.”

Superville’s report reflected her initial conspiratorial take

on Trump’s remarks,

“.@POTUS adds to the intrigue

surrounding @FLOTUS, telling reporters
President and Mrs. Trump at a FEMA briefing, June 6, 2018, White she wanted to join him at G-7 but she had
House photo via Twitter.
a 4-hour operation and docs told her not to
70
 fly for a month…Trump used ‘surgery’ in
his tweet earlier this week about Melania.
First lady’s office initially said ‘procedure’”
The first lady’s office announced May 14
that she had had an embolization
procedure to treat a kidney condition
described as benign. She spent five nights
in a military hospital before returning to the
White House on May 19 to continue her
recuperation.
Her office has declined to provide
additional details about Mrs. Trump’s
condition, citing privacy rights.
Mrs. Trump’s absence, beginning soon
after she announced her initiative to teach
kindness to children, sparked all sorts of
theories about where she was and what
might have happened to her, including that
she had moved back to the family’s
penthouse at Trump Tower in New York…”

Superville’s report concluded saying Melania had made

her first public appearance since the surgery on
Wednesday at a FEMA hurricane season briefing, but
failed to note she had attended a private White House
reception for Gold Star families Monday evening or that
Melania had been seen by several reporters last week
walking around the White House.

On Wednesday President Trump blasted the media for

spreading vicious gossip about the First Lady as she
recuperated in private.

Excerpt:

…Trump’s comments only added to the

mystery surrounding his wife’s recent
hospitalization and nearly four-week
absence from the public eye.

71
 Breaking: Feinstein’s Former Intel Staffer
Daniel Jones Is Also Connected To NY Times
Reporter In Leak Investigation
By Cristina Laila
June 8, 2018, 2:36 Pm

Former Senate Intel Committee aide,
James A. Wolfe, 57, was arrested on
Thursday after the DOJ conducted an
investigation into classified information
leaks to reporters.
Wolfe repeatedly lied to investigators
about his contacts with reporters and
made false statements to the FBI.
The Justice Department also seized New
York Times reporter, Ali Watkins years’
worth of phone and email records.
Watkins previously worked for Buzzfeed
and Politico as a national security
reporter.
In a letter sent to the Minority last week accusing Fusion
GPS founder Glenn Simpson of giving “extremely
misleading” statements during a 2017 Senate testimony,
Grassley put an interesting footnote at the bottom of his
letter implying Daniel Jones may have fed Fusion’s
information to the Minority [Ranking member Dianne
Feinstein and other Minority Democrat members] as part
of his ongoing campaign.
Daniel Jones is also connected to New York Times reporter,
Ali Watkins AND worked closely with Wolfe, the senate
intel staffer who was arrested Thursday evening.
Follow this thread by National Security
reporter, Jordan Schachtel:

New York Times reporter Ali Watkins

It is time to start asking some serious

questions about Senator Dianne
Feinstein’s former intel staffer Daniel
Jones.

The Federalist first reported in February a former staffer

for Dem Senator Dianne Feinstein, Daniel Jones was
working with Fusion GPS.

A group of about 7-10 wealthy donors from California

(Silicon Valley) and New York spent $50 million to fund a
Trump-Russia investigation conducted by none other than
Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS and a former staffer for
Dem Senator Dianne Feinstein named Daniel Jones.

72
 Attorney General Jeff Sessions said back in November,
“We intend to get to the bottom of these leaks.”

There are currently 27 (now 26) leak investigations at the

Justice Department; it is time to start asking serious
questions about Dianne Feinstein’s former Intel staffer,
Daniel Jones.

A few weeks ago, President Trump put White House

leakers on notice.

“We will find out who they are,” said the President after
referring to leakers as “traitors and cowards.”

73
 FAIL: Nancy Pelosi Rips President Trump
For Consumer Confidence — Doesn’t Realize It’s
At An 18-Year High! (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 3:19 Pm

confidence is doing well and actually

Nancy Pelosi Rips President Trump for near an 18 year high!
Consumer Confidence — Doesn’t
Realize It’s At an 18-Year High!
Dunce Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
made headlines again this week with her
bizarre statements on the booming US
economy.

Ouch! Watch Trish Regan DESTROY

Nancy Pelosi on Economics 101

Via The Intelligence Report:

Nancy Pelosi told reporters,

“Hip hip hooray! Unemployment is down.

What does that mean to me and my life. I
need a bigger paycheck. This isn’t just
about the unemployment rate, it’s about
wages rising in our country so that
consumer confidence is restored. Because
our economy will never fully reach our
possibilities unless we increase our
consumer confidence.”
That’s when Trish Regan ripped Pelosi
for not knowing that consumer
.

74
 BREAKING: Aaron Rich Attorneys Subpoena Twitter To
Turn Over All Direct Messages From: Wikileaks, Julian
Assange, Kimdotcom, Cassandra Fairbanks,
Gateway Pundit, Etc
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 4:02 Pm
HOW IS THIS LEGAL?
Twitter sent out notices to several investigative reporters
and media outlets on Friday including:
Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Kim DotCom,
Cassandra Fairbanks and The Gateway
Pundit.
The liberal and Democrat-connected attorneys for Aaron
Rich are demanding Twitter turn over all direct messages
from these accounts to Aarron Rich’s attorneys.
Aaron is the brother of Seth Rich, the DNC operative who
was murdered mysteriously in the summer of 2016. There
have been no leads to the murder of Seth Rich. Aaron Rich
is suing conservative activists and media outlets for
allegedly spreading conspiracy theories about the slain
staffer.
On Friday Twitter sent out letters to several conservatives
and media outlets including Wikileaks informing the
account owners that the attorneys for Aaron Rich are
seeking information from the private accounts.
Here is a copy of the letter sent to The Gateway Pundit —
(sections and phone numbers deleted).
75
This action is pending in:
United States District Court, District of Colombia
The attorney(s) representing subpoenaing party is:
Michael J. Gottlieb
Twitter has not disclosed any information regarding your account
at this time. However, we wanted to bring this matter to your
attention. Please be advised that Twitter may be obligated to
produce basic subscriber information related to your account in
the future. Accordingly, please advise within 14 days from the
date of this notice, from the email address associated with your
Twitter account, @gatewaypundit, if you intend to appear in this
matter or file a motion to quash. Please also provide us with
copies of any papers you file with the Court. If you plan to have
your attorney contact us, please first respond to this email from
the email address associated with your Twitter account,
@gatewaypundit, letting us know that your attorney will be
contacting us and providing us with your attorney’s name and
contact information.
While we cannot give you any legal advice, we suggest that you
seek your own counsel in this matter. If you need assistance
seeking counsel, you may consider contacting the Electronic
Frontier Foundation
(https://www.eff.org/pages/legal-assistance[eff.org],info@eff.org,
+1 415-436-****) or the ACLU
(http://www.aclu.org/affiliates[aclu.org], +1 212-549-****).
For more general information on legal requests, please refer to
the following Help Center article: https://t.co/*****.
Sincerely,
Twitter Legal
 Congress Votes To Audit Mueller’s
Multi-Million Dollar Russia Witch Hunt
By Cristina Laila
June 8, 2018, 4:29 Pm
‘oversight’ which is utterly pathetic given the Deputy
Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark AG’s many conflicts of interest.
Meadows (R-NC) introduced an
amendment Friday to audit Mueller’s Chairman Meadows has been hammering Rosenstein to get
out-of-control multi-million dollar witch pertinent documents such as his memo on Mueller’s scope.
hunt.
Meadows’ move to audit Mueller will help put pressure on
The House voted 207-201 to attach the
the Special Counsel to turn over the memo.
language to a veterans, military
construction, and energy and water
spending bill that was headed to pass Meadows tweeted: I’ve introduced an amendment to
Friday, reported the Examiner. require a semi-annual financial audit of special counsels by
the GAO. A special counsel’s work is important, but they
should not be able to spend taxpayer dollars without
accountability. Americans need to know where their
money is going.

The Office of Special Counsel released a

statement of expenditures last Thursday
revealing over $4.5 million has been
flushed down the toilet in just a 6 month
period hunting Russian ghosts.

This $4.5 million is in addition to the $6.7 million the

Special Counsel cost the first five months. Add to that
other Department of Justice costs ‘related to Russia’ which
brings the figure even higher to what Politico estimates to
be $17 million total spent on the Russia probe.

Taxpayers are being punished and forced to pay liberal Chairman Meadows celebrated.
hack lawyers millions of dollars for the crime of electing
Donald Trump to be their Commander-in-Chief.

Not to mention the lives devastated and destroyed by

Mueller.

The Office of Special Counsel refuses to publicly release a

budget because Mueller thinks he’s a King.

Mueller roves around raiding people connected to Trump

with zero accountability; Rosenstein is Mueller’s only Just like Tom Fitton always says, “shut it down!”

76
 MUST SEE=> Wasserman Schultz Refuses To Answer
Reporter’s Questions About Imran Awan (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 8, 2018, 5:54 Pm

Watch how Wasserman Schultz ignores questions about

her dear Imran.

VIDEO via The Daily Caller:

Imran Awan worked for Debbie

Wasserman Schultz for thirteen years
since she came into office in 2004 as a
Florida representative.

Imran and his two Pakistani brothers managed the IT
affairs for several Democratic government officials. They
were relieved of their duties in February 2017 on suspicion
that they accessed specific computer networks without
permission, also known as hacking.
Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were
barred from computer networks at the
House of Representatives in February
2017.
Nice job Kerry!
A House official previously told Circa News that Imran
Awan was uploading terabits of information to dropbox
and may have sold the uploaded info. Everyone is talking
about Russia but Awan could have been the one to have
sold the DNC emails. The DNC refuses to hand over their
servers to be investigated. If they really were the victim of
a ‘hack’ like they claim, they wouldn’t be protecting their
servers from authorities.

Imran Awan was married to two women at once, including
his first cousin, as is his country’s custom.
The Pakistani IT staffers made millions of dollars over the
years providing ‘IT work’ for House Democrats; zero
background checks were conducted on Awan and his
family members.
On Friday, Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to answer
The Daily Caller’s Kerry Picket‘s questions about
accusations she attempted to shut down the investigation
into her Pakistani IT aide, Imran Awan.
.
According to investigative reporter, Luke Rosiak, Imran
Awan was also remotely accessing the House server
FROM Pakistan.
Imran Awan and his wife Alvi reportedly struck a plea
deal this week.
This is one of the biggest scandals in US political history,
yet AWOL Attorney General Jeff Sessions refuses to bring
charges against this Pakistani spy ring.

77
 Ex-Obama Security Adviser Ben Rhodes: ‘Worries Me’
That Government Can’t Edit People’s
Facebook Feeds (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 8, 2018, 6:09 Pm
The emergence of social media has shattered the left’s
media dominance.
Conservative leaning news sites like the Gateway Pundit,
Breitbart and The Daily Caller were able to use social
media to eclipse the mainstream media’s coverage of the
2016 presidential election, according to a report from
Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.
President Trump mastered social media to get his message
directly to the American people.
As a result, the left is desperate to censor people’s
Facebook news feed.
Facebook launched new algorithms that prevents Gateway
Pundit posts from appearing in people’s Facebook news
feeds. The algorithms have even caused President Trump’s
engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping
45%.
Last month, scandal-plagued Hillary Clinton admitted she
wanted to become the CEO of Facebook to control the
flow of information.
Now, former top Obama aide Ben
Rhodes is warning about the
government’s inability to access the
Facebook feeds of private citizens and
“edit” what they determine to be “fake
news” will jeopardize the electoral
process.
78
While discussing the alleged hacking of the Democratic
National Committee server during the 2016 election and
the leaking of DNC and Clinton campaign emails, Rhodes,
Obama’s former Deputy National Security Advisor,
warned that the accessibility of “fake news” on social
media and Russian propaganda is more concerning than
data breaches.
“The government didn’t have a lot of
capacity to deal with this – I mean we can’t
edit people’s Facebook feeds and say
‘that’s fake news, and that’s not’” he said.
“And what worries me today, Andrea, is
that we still don’t have a lot of capacity, and
frankly our government’s probably not
doing anything to prevent this.”
As a result of the government not controlling Facebook
feeds, Rhodes continued, the “likelihood” of Russia
spreading fake news on Facebook in future elections “is
very high.”
A new HBO documentary called “The Final Year,”which
examines the last days of the Obama administration, shows
a devastated Rhodes trying to process the fact that Trump
had won the 2016 election, seemingly holding back tears.
 If Seth Rich Had Nothing To Do With Wikileaks Why Did
Rich Attorneys Just Subpoena Julian Assange And
Wikileaks Twitter Messages?
By Jim Hoft
June 8, 2018, 7:11 Pm

is suing conservative activists and media outlets for

allegedly spreading conspiracy theories about the slain
staffer.

On Friday Twitter sent out letters to several conservatives

and media outlets including Wikileaks informing the
account owners that the attorneys for Aaron Rich are
seeking information from the private accounts.

Attorney Robert Barnes weighed in on

the outrageous demands by the Obama
Twitter sent out notices to several attorneys.
investigative reporters and media
outlets on Friday including: Wikileaks,
Julian Assange, Kim DotCom,
Cassandra Fairbanks, Roger Stone, Matt
Couch and The Gateway Pundit.

The liberal and Democrat-connected attorneys for Aaron

Rich are demanding Twitter turn over all direct messages
from these accounts to Aarron Rich’s attorneys.

Aaron Rich and Democrats insist Seth

Rich had nothing to do with the leaked
Hillary emails to Julian Assange and
Wikileaks.

Then why are they going after Julian

Assange and Wikileaks?

What are they expecting to find?

Update: Here is a copy of the subpoena to Twitter.

Subpoena to Twitter Aaron RICH v. Ed Butowsky-1 by Jim

Aaron is the brother of Seth Rich, the DNC operative who Hoft on Scribd on next page.
was murdered mysteriously in the summer of 2016. There
have been no leads to the murder of Seth Rich. Aaron Rich
.

79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
 Joe Digenova: IG Report Is Being
Scrubbed By Rosenstein (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 8, 2018, 9:40 Pm

“The Deputy Attorney General wants to

hurt the President and he wants to prevent
the release of truthful information to deny
transparency to the American people to
protect career people inside the DOJ and
the FBI,” DiGenova said.

Another reason for the delays is so the DOJ can

strategically leak to control the narrative.

Lawmakers also warned Tuesday

the Inspector General is being
Former US Attorney Joe DiGenova said this week on Fox pressured to slow walk and redact
News with Sean Hannity that the IG report is being significant portions of his much-
scrubbed by Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein. anticipated report on the FBI’s
(mis)handling of the Clinton
Inspector General Michael Horowitz investigation.
informed lawmakers weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 400 Inspector General Michael Horowitz said in a letter to
page report on the FBI’s handling of Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley he will be
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation releasing his report on June 14th, which is President
entered the final stages. Trump’s birthday.

Lawyers for the subjects included in the report were given Horowitz is also set to testify in a Congressional hearing
a draft copy to prepare rebuttals for their clients which is about his findings on June 18th.
what partially led to delays in releasing the report to the
public.
VIDEO:
DiGenova says the other reason for the delay is that Rod
Rosenstein is scrubbing and redacting in order to protect
the department employees.

“Rod Rosenstein is a careerist. He believes

in the institution of the DOJ and the FBI to
the exclusion of any accusations of fault
and what is happening right now is the IG
report is being scrubbed by Rosenstein and
his minions and people at the FBI and they
are removing as much embarrassing
information about the bureau as
possible,”DiGenova said.

DiGenova said this move by Rosenstein and others is

reprehensible.
.

94
 Aussie Alexander Downer From Spygate Involved In Sale
Of Australian Uranium To Same Russian Company
That Purchased Uranium One
By Jim Hoft
June 9, 2018, 7:58 Am
Aussie Alexander Downer from Spygate
fame not only signed a deal to provide
$25 million to the Clinton Foundation
but he was also involved in the sale of
uranium to the same Russian state
owned company that later purchased
Uranium One.
Australian Alexander Downer has a storied past. In 2006
he signed an agreement to provide $25 million to the
corrupt Clinton Foundation –
The Australian diplomat whose tip in 2016 prompted the
Russia-Trump investigation previously arranged one of the
largest foreign donations to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s
charitable efforts, documents show.
Former Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer’s
role in securing $25 million in aid from his country to help
the Clinton Foundation fight AIDS is chronicled in
decade-old government memos archived on the Australian
foreign ministry’s website.
95
Downer and former President Clinton jointly signed a
Memorandum of Understanding in February 2006 that
spread out the grant money over four years for a project to
provide screening and drug treatment to AIDS patients in
Asia.
Next Downer in 2007 signed an agreement for Australia to
provide Australian uranium to Russian company Rosatom
–
A co-operation agreement in the field of nuclear energy
has been signed by Sergey Kiriyenko, the head of Russia’s
Rosatom, and Australian Foreign Minister Alexander
Downer that will see Australia supply uranium to Russia
for processing and for use at its power plants.
Kiriyenko said that under the terms of the agreement
Russia is ready to process 4,000 tonnes of Australian
uranium a year saying:
“The possible contracts we are negotiating
now are about 4,000 tons of uranium a
year, which is not far from 1,000,000,000
Australian dollars ($826 million).”
Kiriyenko added that the agreement will give Russia as
much uranium as it wants, and will strongly enhance its
uranium enrichment potential. The agreement may bring
low-enriched uranium supply contracts with Japan worth
$2 billion within 2008–2015, some $400 million with
Europe, and $300 – $400 million with the United States,
said Aleksey Grigoryev, acting director general of Russian
uranium firm Techsnabexport (Tenex).
However, Grigoryev added:
“We have made no natural uranium
purchase contracts with Australia yet, we
just have a framework agreement.”
The sale of Russian uranium to the Russians and the
payment of money to the Clinton Foundation at around the
same time sound familiar to Americans, because this also
happened in the US in what many believe is the real
Russian collusion scandal. The far left New York Times
surprisingly was the first to report this story –
The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President
Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor
recalling an era when its precursor served as the official
mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy
Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian
atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a
Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching
from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made
Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and
brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of
the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American
president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
96
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the
Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to
the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton
and his family. Members of that group built, financed and
eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would
become known as Uranium One.
The Clinton Foundation received $146 million shortly after
the sale of Uranium One was approved by former
President Obama and his failed Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton. This resulted in 20% of US uranium landing in
Russian hands.
Soon after the Uranium One story was released Obama’s
FBI in late 2015 and early 2016 ironically began an effort
to align the Trump campaign with Russia. The far-left and
their media then jumped on this narrative as the election
transpired.
What kicked off the Trump-Russia farce was supposedly a
drunken discussion between a young Trump volunteer
(George Papadopoulos) and Australian Ambassador
Alexander Downer. The young American repeated to
Downer what he heard from an FBI spy that Russia held a
copy of Hillary’s emails. When he told this to Downer, it
was somehow relayed to the US.
Supposedly this is what started the official FBI Trump-
Russia investigation. Now we find out that the Aussie
involved in the scandal is also involved with the Clinton
Foundation and uranium sales to Russia. Also, we now
also know that the individuals that created or are part of
the Mueller ‘witch hunt’, Rosenstein, Mueller and
Wiessmann, were all part of the Uranium One scandal as
well.
Australia would be wise to look into the
various nefarious activities of
Ambassador Downer. A serious review
would no doubt prove beneficial to the
ensuring the rule of law ‘down under’.
 TRUMP APPROVAL RATING Better
Than Obama And Reagan At Same Point
In Their Presidencies
By Jim Hoft
June 9, 2018, 8:46 Am

According to the latest FOX News poll

President Donald Trump has a better
rating than Presidents Obama and
Reagan at the same point in their
presidencies.
President Trump’s approval is now at 45%.
And that is with 90% negative coverage from the far left
mainstream media.
On June 9, 2010 Barack Obama’s approval number was
46% on the Rasmussen poll.
President Trump’s approval number is at 47% according to
Rasmussen today.
Again…. That is with 90% extremely
negative coverage for President Trump!

President Trump – 45%

President Obama – 44%
President Reagan – 44%
.

97
 BOOM! President Trump Stomps
On “Fake News” CNN At Quebec G7 Presser (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 9, 2018, 9:55 Am

BOOM! alliance system shifting under your

presidency?
President Trump called out Fake News CNN at his
Charlevoix, Quebec G7 presser Saturday. President Trump:

Who are you with out of curiosity?

CNN reporter:

CNN.

President Trump:

I figured, fake news CNN. The worst. But, I

had no idea you’re with CNN. After the
question I was just curious who you’re with.
You’re with CNN.
A CNN reporter asked President Trump a very pointed
question on US allies and a “friendlier” Kim Jong-Un. Ouch!

President Trump pounced on the CNN reporter. Here’s the exchange:

CNN reporter:

As you are heading into these G7 talks

there’s a sense that America’s closest
allies are frustrated with you and angry with
you and that you are angry with them and
that you are leaving here to go meet with
more friendlier talks with Kim Jong-Un in
Singapore and I was wondering if you view
it the same way? And do you view the US

98
 President Trump Proposes ZERO Tariffs,
ZERO Barriers, And ZERO Subsidies
At G7 Summit (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 9, 2018, 11:17 Am

Leadership.
This ought to push the globalists back
on their heels.

President Trump on Saturday

challenged G7 leaders to make the G7 a
tariff free and subsidy free zone.
“We’re the piggy bank that everybody is
robbing,” Trump said. “And that ends.”
President Trump announced the
proposal during his press conference
Saturday morning before leaving early
for his meeting next week in Singapore.
.

99
 Gohmert SLAMS Mueller: ‘He’s Covering Up His
Involvement In Uranium One While Trying To Have A
Coup Against The President’ (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 9, 2018, 1:21 Pm

Rep Louie Gohmert (R-TX) appeared on out-of-control multi-million dollar witch

Fox & Friends Saturday to discuss the
new amendment that just passed the
House calling for an audit of Mueller’s
multi-million dollar witch hunt.
hunt.
The House voted 207-201 to attach the
language to a veterans, military
construction, and energy and water
spending bill that was headed to pass
Friday, reported the Examiner.
The Office of Special Counsel released a
statement of expenditures last Thursday
revealing over $4.5 million has been
flushed down the toilet in just a 6 month
period hunting Russian ghosts.

Rep. Gohmert said not only is Mueller wasting millions of

taxpayer dollars, he’s covering up his own involvement in
the Uranium One scandal while trying to have a coup
against the President.

Gohmert is one of the few members of Congress speaking

the truth about Mueller’s attempted coup and cover up of
past crimes.

“He’s wasted money right and left–

amazingly he’s hired people like
Weissmann that worked with him and
Rosenstein in investigating the Russian
illegal efforts to obtain our Uranium which
they quashed information in order to allow
the sale to go through so that Hillary could This $4.5 million is in addition to the $6.7 million the
get the $145 million for her foundation,” Special Counsel cost the first five months. Add to that
Gohmert said. other Department of Justice costs ‘related to Russia’ which
“So it is really outrageous–he’s brings the figure even higher to what Politico estimates to
covering for himself, at the same time be $17 million total spent on the Russia probe.
he’s trying to have a coup against the
President.” Taxpayers are being punished and forced to pay liberal
hack lawyers millions of dollars for the crime of electing
VIDEO: Donald Trump to be their Commander-in-Chief.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Not to mention the lives devastated and destroyed by
Meadows (R-NC) introduced an Mueller
amendment Friday to audit Mueller’s
Just like Tom Fitton always says, “Shut it down!”
100
 Bill Maher Hopes For Bottom To
Drop Out On Economy To “Get Rid Of Trump” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 9, 2018, 1:39 Pm

“I feel like the bottom has to fall out [of the

economy] at some point, and by the way,
I’m hoping for it. I think one way you get rid
of Trump is by crashing the economy. So
please, bring on the recession.”

Spoken like a true liberal – with NO

regard for the common man.

Far left comedian Bill Maher told his

audience on Friday he hopes the
economy collapsed to Get rid of Donald
Trump as president.
Maher admitted the economy “is going
pretty well” on his show on Friday night.

Then he told his audience he hopes it

tanks.
.

101
 Past Tweets Come Back To Haunt
NY Times Reporter In Leak Investigation
By Cristina Laila
June 9, 2018, 3:03 Pm

You just can’t make this stuff up…

Former Senate Intel Committee aide,
James A. Wolfe, 57, was arrested on
Thursday after the DOJ conducted an
investigation into classified information
leaks to reporters.
Wolfe repeatedly lied to investigators
about his contacts with reporters and
made false statements to the FBI.

The Justice Department also seized New York Times

reporter, Ali Watkins years’ worth of phone and email
records.

Watkins previously worked for Buzzfeed and Politico as a

national security reporter.

These tweets were posted just weeks before damaging

articles on Carter Page were published.

It gets better…

Ali Watkins also tweeted about the Netflix show ‘House

New York Times reporter Ali Watkins
According to the NY Times, Ali Watkins was having a
romantic relationship with the Senate Intel aide, Wolfe.
Some of their communication back and forth took place
before she was employed by The New York Times.
Watkins’ old tweets have come back to
haunt her.
of Cards’ referring to Zoe Barnes, a young reporter who
slept with her much older ‘source,’ a Congressman [Kevin
Spacey] in order get exclusive stories.
The best part is Ali Watkins used the hashtag
#BadLifeChoice.
Watkins tweeted: I wanted to be Zoe Barnes…until
episode 4. Sleeping with your source- especially a
vindictive congressman? #badlifechoice #HouseofCards

Watkins sent out a pair of tweets on September 19th 2017

about the Intel Committee being frustrated by the

“constant dribble of leaks.”

The NY Times reporter then said it is Trump’s lawyers who

are leaking info, blaming the Committee then using it as a
pretext not to cooperate.
102
Watkins also tweeted: So on a scale of 1 to ethical, how
does everyone feel about pulling a @RealZoeBarnes for
story ideas? #TOTALLYKIDDING @HouseofCards
A few weeks ago, President Trump put White House
leakers on notice.
“We will find out who they are,” said the
President after referring to leakers as
“traitors and cowards.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said back in November,

“We intend to get to the bottom of these

leaks.”

The ‘House of Cards’ tweets were posted just a few

months before Ali Watkins, a young reporter in her 20’s
began dating Wolfe, a Senate Intel Aide in his 50’s.
.

103
 Trump Reminds Everyone Exactly
Who’s Responsible For Russian Aggression — Obama
Justin Caruso | Senior Media Reporter
5:14 Pm 06/09/2018

“You have to ask President Obama

because he let Crimea get away, that was
during his administration.”
“Crimea was let go during the Obama
Administration, and Obama can say all he
wants but he allowed Russia to take
Crimea,” he also said. “I may have had a
much different attitude.”

Trump isn’t the first person to point the finger at Obama

President Trump was asked about Russia during a press
for inaction on Russia.
conference in Canada Saturday, and he responded by
reminding everyone that it was former President Obama
who let Russian aggression go unchecked. Rep. Devin Nunes said in February,

WATCH: “We went through a whole European

infrastructure consolidation process of
military installations across Europe,
abandoned a lot of abilities in the North
Atlantic to track Russian subs.”
“We actually had the president of the
United States, who said on a hot mic to the
prime minister of Russia at the time, ‘Just
tell Vladimir to wait after the election.’ That
was President Obama who said that.”
“So who created this Russian threat? Who?
It was the last administration that put us in
this position.”

When asked about Russia annexing Crimea, Trump said,

104
 John McCain Undercuts President Trump With Foreign
Leaders As He Leaves G7 And Heads
For North Korea Meeting
By Kristinn Taylor
June 9, 2018, 8:41 Pm

Photo from G7 posted by Angela Merkel’s

Instagram account has gone viral with
opponents of Trump who fantasize he is
being backed in to a corner by the other G7
leaders led by Merkel.

McCain’s statement reads, “To our allies: bipartisan

majorities of Americans remain pro-free trade, pro-
globalization & supportive of alliances based on 70 years
of shared values. Americans stand with you, even if our
president doesn’t.”
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) posted a statement Saturday
night undermining President Donald Trump with foreign
leaders after the President had departed a contentious
Quebec G7 summit over trade issues and was headed for a
historic meeting with North Korea in Singapore over
nuclear weapons.

McCain’s tweet quickly went viral with nearly 20,000

likes, over 7,000 retweets and over 1.000 comments in the
half hour from when it was posted at 8:55 p.m. EDT.

105
 Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol: G7 Leaders Should Have
Called For Mueller Investigation To Continue Unimpeded
By Alicia Powe
June 9, 2018, 10:40 Pm

calling for the Mueller investigation to be

allowed to proceed unimpeded?” the self-
anointed definer of conservatism tweeted .

President Donald J. Trump’s accomplishments his first 500

days in Office are arguably the best first 500 days of any
President in US history since Washington.

Today there are more people working than at any time in

US history. Millions of Americans have received bonuses
due to the tax cuts. The president decimated ISIS by the
end of his first year in office– with an estimated 1,000 ISIS
fighters or less remaining. Trump is preparing for a
summit with North Korea next week that may end in a de-
nuclearized Korean Peninsula, something unimaginable for
70 years.

All the while, the commander in chief has been dogged

with the Russia probe — a bogus investigation premised
on unsubstantiated allegations that Trump colluded with
Russia to hack the DNC server during the 2016
presidential election (the server the DNC refused to avail
to the FBI and destroyed).

The Russia probe has yet to produce an iota of evidence

substantiating collusion between Trump and the Kremlin.
But Democrats won’t quit.
And neither will #NeverTrump “conservatives,” like the
Weekly Standard’s editor-at-large Bill Kristol.
As Trump met with other Western leaders during a
contentious G7 summit over trade issues Saturday, Kristol
fantasized about foreign meddling into our political
process to derail the president.
“How great would it have been if, after
Trump’s early departure from the G7, the
other leaders had issued a statement
Last month, the prominent Never Trumper argued that a
conservative should to take on the president in the 2020
Republican primaries.
“I don’t know if a challenger would
succeed. In my view, I think it’s important to
have one just to force the debate,” Kristol
said. “I think if Trump were to lose in 2020
it would allow for someone to step up and
say, ‘Well, here’s a different way forward
than just kind of trying to redo Trump over
the next several years.’”

106
Ohio governor John Kasich, Kristol explained, would be
the most formidable challenger,

107
 James Comey Attacks President Trump
Over G7 Dispute With Trudeau
By Kristinn Taylor
June 9, 2018, 10:52 Pm

Fired FBI Director James Comey attacked President

Donald Trump over the Quebec G7 summit, posting to
Twitter a typical Comey-style passive/aggressive statement
that did not mention Trump by name.

James Comey spoke at a progressive Canadian conference last week.

“Our national security relationship with
Canada is vital and saves American lives. It
was built over generations and is bigger
than any person or dispute. This too shall
pass.”

Trump posted a statement about his issues with Canadian

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the G7 summit to Twitter
on Saturday after he had left Quebec for Singapore.

“Based on Justin’s false statements at his

news conference, and the fact that Canada
is charging massive Tariffs to our U.S.
farmers, workers and companies, I have
instructed our U.S. Reps not to endorse the
Communique as we look at Tariffs on
automobiles flooding the U.S. Market!”
“PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so
meek and mild during our @G7 meetings
only to give a news conference after I left
saying that, “US Tariffs were kind of
insulting” and he “will not be pushed
around.” Very dishonest & weak. Our
Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on
dairy!”

108

Earlier in the week, Comey made an appearance at
progressive Canadian group conference in which he
trashed Trump ahead of the summit.
“Fired FBI Director James Comey trashed
President Donald Trump in front of a
Canadian audience days before Trump will
be attending the G7 summit in Quebec,
.
109
saying the world is less secure, the other
G7 leaders could not trust Trump and that
long-standing relations don’t matter to
Trump because, “It’s all about him.”
Comey’s attack on Trump followed one by Sen. John
McCain (R-AZ) that said,
““To our allies: bipartisan majorities of
Americans remain pro-free trade, pro-
globalization & supportive of alliances
based on 70 years of shared values.
Americans stand with you, even if our
president doesn’t.”
Trump left the G7 summit early Saturday and is on his way
to Singapore for a historic meeting with North Korea over
nuclear weapons.
 Trudeau Gives Trump Photo Of His Grandfather’s
Canadian Hotel — Or Was It A Brothel?
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 12:10 Am

Canada’s Prime Minister Trudeau tried

to punk the President – which is never a Upon leaving the summit the President tweeted his
good idea. Instead the Trump destroyed disapproval of the weak and dishonest Trudeau for all the
the PM calling him weak and dishonest. world to see –

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looked like he

was holding back laughter Friday at the G7 summit when
he presented President Trump with a framed photo of a
hotel that President Trump’s grandfather once owned in
British Columbia.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders tweeted a

picture of the event –

“Great moment between @JustinTrudeau

and @POTUS when he gave him picture of
the President’s grandfather’s hotel in
Canada. #G72018″, the tweet said.

However, the left wing radical media immediately went

into overdrive repeating a story that the President’s
grandfather actually ran a brothel. This story comes from
a hit piece in Bloomberg that the President has said is
totally false.

The effeminate Trudeau thought he was The President preceded the above tweet with a tweet about
getting away with a good one. the PM’s statements being false at his news conference –
Unfortunately for him, he was dealing
with the greatest and strongest alpha
male to hold the White House in a very
long time.

110
 The meek, mild, and weak Trudeau
should know not to mess with President
Trump.

The President has the strongest

economy in US history and is on his
way to save Asia.

Trump is clearly something Justin will

never be.
.

111
 NYT's Krugman Claims Journalists
Are ‘Afraid’ To Call Trump ‘Crazy’
By Kristine Marsh
June 11, 2018 7:45 AM EDT

Sometimes you just have to wonder what planet Paul
Krugman, the radical, left-wing columnist and economist
for the New York Times, is living on. On Sunday morning,
the journalist went on a tweet storm complaining that the
media wasn’t presenting Trump accurately...because they
were presenting him as sane.
Krugman went on to call journalists too timid to call out
the president for being crazy. After all, they’d be accused
of being “unbalanced” if they did that, he wrote. Clearly
giving the media too much credit, he added, “Too often,
they pretend that he’s talking about something real. This
amounts, in practice, to huge pro-Trump bias.”

Apparently Krugman has been living under a rock, because As if he hadn’t been clear enough already, Krugman came
Trump’s alleged psychosis is the media’s second favorite straight out and called Trump and his voters, crazy: “One
talking point, after his alleged collusion with Russia to win side isn’t even wrong, just completely insane,” he
the election in 2016. Regardless, the NYT columnist spent reiterated
five tweets ranting about how the media was aiding
Trump’s agenda by “pretending” he was sane and rational.
Furthermore, Krugman wrote, Trump’s policies were
derived entirely from problems Trump had made up in his
mind.

So what did he list as examples of these supposed

imaginary issues Trump drew out of thin air? How about
illegal immigrant crime, and illegal voting?

.
112
Interesting Development: The Trump Campaign Foreign
Policy Experts Now Under Investigation Were Brought In
Under AG Jeff Sessions
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 7:54 Am
As we previously reported, the Recent
House Intel Committee Report on
Russia noted numerous issues but
hidden in Issue #27 is an obscure piece
of information that former Senator and
113
current Attorney General Jeff Sessions
oversaw the small team of five foreign
policy experts for the Trump campaign.
Included in this small group were Carter
Page and George Papadopoulos.
According to the House Intel report, the future President
was under pressure to put together a foreign policy team in
March of 2016. A number of seasoned Republican foreign
policy experts were unwilling to jump on the Trump train.
Because of this pressure from the press to show he had
experts on his team, candidate Trump named then
Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions as the chairman of his
National Security Advisory Committee (NSAC). A few
weeks later, candidate Trump released the names of five
people on his team. The list included Carter Page and
George Papadopoulos.
The House Intel Report states that –
There is no evidence that anyone on the
Trump campaign was aware of Page’s past
ties to Russian intelligence services-or
Papadopoulos’ more recent contacts with a
Russian-connected professor-when these
two individuals were included among the
advisors that were publicly announced on
March 21. In fact, as [President Trump’s
son in law Jared] Kushner candidly put it,
“we put together that list because we were
getting a lot of pressure from the media to
put out a list of foreign policy advisers.”
The Daily Caller reported that both Carter Page and
George Papadopoulos were hired by Sam Clovis, the
Trump campaign’s co-chairman, but the source of this
information remains anonymous. It is more likely that Jeff
Sessions was responsible for hiring both Page and
Papadopoulos for the Trump campaign because they
reported to him.
.
114
The individuals under Sessions are also the individuals that
had dealings with UK spies. Papadopoulos met with
Mifsud, Halper and Aussie Downer. Carter Page also had
dealings with some or all of these British spies. There are
many questions concerning these individuals.
The House Intel report states that there is no evidence that
the Trump campaign was aware of the team’s connections
with Russians. The question must be asked, did the House
ask Sessions? Did Sessions recuse himself because he
knowingly set up the Trump campaign with British spies
and Russians?
It’s curious that the only person on the
Trump team that recused himself from
the Russia farce (Sessions) is also the
person who was the Chairman of
candidate Trump’s National Security
Advisory Counsel which includes the
most notorious individuals on the
Trump campaign team. Does Sessions
know more than he has let on?
 Former Obama CIA Director John Brennan
Hits President Trump Again After G7 Meetings
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 8:26 Am

On Sunday morning, former CIA Director John Brennan Brennan reassured our globalist allies
hammered President Trump after the G7 meetings in that Trump will be gone soon.
Canada.

President Trump skipped out on the discussions on global

warming to meet with Kim Jong-Un in Singapore instead.

John Brennan joined John McCain and dirty cop Jim

Comey in attacking President Trump after the summit.

Of course, John Brennan is a former(?) communist.

President Trump knocked Prime Minister Trudeau after

leaving Canada. Trump accused Trudeau of waiting until
the US president was out of Canada before attacking his
comments on tariffs and trade.

115
Dennis Rodman Brought Kim Jong-Un A Present:
‘The Art Of The Deal’ By Donald J. Trump
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 10:11 Am

Rodman announced on Friday that thanks to his loyal

sponsors from @potcoin and his team at
@Prince_Mrketing he will be attending the Trump-Kim
Summit next week.

Rodman will be in Singapore this week for the Trump-Kim

summit.

Rodman brought the North Korean

leader a present on his last visit to the
Hermit Kingdom.

It was a copy of “The Art of the Deal” by

Donald J. Trump.

Last week The New York Post

announced Dennis Rodman will be in
Singapore during talks between
President Donald Trump and North
Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.

116
 MSNBC Panelists Become Unhinged
Over Trump's Saturday Morning Press Conference
By Tom Blumer
June 10, 2018 10:23 AM EDT
A highly-informed friend called me early Saturday
afternoon and told me how impressed he was with Donald
Trump's knowledge, temperament, and poise at the
Saturday morning's press conference held just before the
President was to leave for Singapore.
Over at MSNBC, the guests on Saturday's AM Joy show
certainly didn't view Trump's performance similarly. They
relentlessly attacked Trump's mental health, physical
health, and intelligence with a level of viciousness
justifying questions about their mental health, physical
health, and intelligence.
Here is the segment involving the CNN reporter (full press
conference is here):
Transcript:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Okay, yes sir. Go
ahead.
UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: As you were
heading into these G-7 talks, there was a
sense that America's closest allies are
frustrated with you and angry with you, and
that you are angry with them, and that you
were leaving here early to go meet for
more friendlier talks with Kim Jong Un
in Singapore. And I'm wondering if you
view it the same way, and do you view the
U.S. alliance system shifting under your
presidency away from —
TRUMP: Who are you with, out of
curiosity?
REPORTER: CNN.
117
TRUMP: I figured. Thank you, CNN.
It works. But, y'know,
I could tell by the question, I had no idea
who you were with CNN. After the
question, I was just curious as to who
you're with. You're with CNN.
Trump saw through the reporter's slanted, presumptive
question, based only on a "sense" that relations with U.S.
allies are fractured and an implicit assumption that Trump
would rather talk to communist dictators than other leaders
in the relatively free world. Trump figured the question
was coming from a congenitally hostile news outlet, and it
indeed was.
But remember, the left and much of the establishment
press continues to insist that he's a complete idiot. Over at
MSNBC, John Harwood, Malcolm Nance and other
panelists not seen in the video snip below — and this is
being charitable — went into cloud cuckooland as they
went down this tired path:
Transcript:
JOHN HARWOOD: I don't think the upshot
of this press conference was about tariffs.
I'll be honest as a citizen. I'm concerned
about the president's state of mind. He
did not look well to me in that press
conference. He was not speaking
logically or rationally. Its sounded as if he
was making stuff up, saying, "Oh China told
me nobody's ever talked to us," or saying,
"Oh, you know I talked to Justin Trudeau,
and he can't believe he was getting away
with so much trade stuff."
I don't think those things are true, and there
was something about his affect which was
oddly kind of languid from him. I don't know
what it means, but he did not look well to
me.
JOY REID: Yeah, and you know, Malcolm,
you have Donald Trump saying North
Korea will be a tremendous place in a very
short period of time. That's an odd thing to
say about North Korea, which is a
completely closed dictatorship. He seems
very eager to go and talk to Kim Jong-un.
To John Harwood's point, very little of
what he was saying made a lot of sense.
MALCOLM NANCE: Well, John has hit the
nail on the head.
And you know, I think Steve Schmidt
said this the other day, that Donald
Trump comes off like a moron. Well you
know, I don't think that does justice to
the Skinner-Benet test. I think he came off
like an idiot today.
I was almost shocked at the way that he
spoke with utter contempt of every
president that preceded him. He does not
fundamentally appear to believe in the
processes and systems that put him in
the office. He doesn't appear to believe
in the alliances that bind us together,
that make us stronger as a nation. It is all
about his narcissism.
And the view from a national security
perspective, this man wouldn't qualify for
the nuclear weapons control system, to
allow him to be anywhere near the nuclear
control -- the nuclear control keys, or even
guarding them.
118
I mean, I'm really shocked at the way that
he speaks because it is all Donald Trump
centric. He came off like Mad King
Donald not President of the United
States.
Commenting on the bolded items:
 I don't know that John Harwood betrayed a particularly
healthy "state of mind." As a tweeter cited at
Twitchy.com noted in recalling a Harwood statement in
May which was covered at the time by Scott Whitlock
at NewsBusters: "Odd, I’ve been worried about John’s
state of mind ever since he insisted we can’t refer to
rapists and murderers as 'animals.'"
 So the name-calling escalation continues, with no end
in sight.
 There is no evidence that Trump "does not
fundamentally appear to believe in the processes and
systems that put him in the office." That accusation is
better directed towards the so-called "Resistance,"
which hasn't accepted the results of the 2016
presidential election.
 If Trump didn't "believe in the alliances that bind us
together," he wouldn't be wasting time with meetings
like the G-7, would he?
 Macolm Nance is right — but only because Trump is
older than 62. He has no other basis for claiming that
Trump "wouldn't qualify for the nuclear weapons control
system."
 As to alleged "narcissism," Malcolm Nance seems to
forget how many times Trump's predecessor so
frequently used the word "I" in so many of his public
statements and speeches that it became a running
national joke.
One reaction to the exhibition of blind fury seen above is
that those still subscribing to using the 25th Amendment as
a way to remove Trump from office — which even the far-
left Think Progress acknowledges is a "fantasy" — were in
apparent need of their periodic feeding.
 Cryin’ Chuck Schumer And Liberal Media OUTRAGED
That Trump Would Not Sign G7 Globalist
‘Communique’ To Weaken America
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 10:46 Am

Cryin’ Chuck and the liberal media was

outraged that President Trump would
not sign on to the G7 communique that
will strengthen everyone but America.

The gnashing of teeth never ends.

Cryin’ Chuck Schumer blasted
President Trump after the G7 Summit in
Canada this weekend.

President Trump skipped town to meet with North Korean

Kim Jong-Un in Singapore for peace talks this week.

Chuck Schumer compared President

Trump to … wait for it… Vlad Putin!

119
 Flashback: China Nicknames
Justin Trudeau “Little Potato”
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 12:46 Pm

President Trump lashed out at Canadian Prime Minister

Justin Trudeau on Saturday after leaving the G7 meetings
early to attend peace talks with North Korean leader Kim
Jong Un.

Upon leaving the summit the President tweeted his

disapproval of the weak and dishonest Trudeau for all the
world to see –

The President preceded the above tweet with a tweet about

the PM’s statements being false at his news conference –

This was after Justin Trudeau took a

couple of pot-shots at President Trump
after he left the summit.
Trudeau promised to impose retaliatory
tariffs against US products after Trump
left the meetings in Canada.

120
 Trump may have been on to something
when he accused Prime Minister
Trudeau being meek and mild.
The Chinese nickname for Justin
Trudeau is “little potato.”
…Trudeau, well-known around the world
for his use of social media, has been given
the nickname “xiao tudou,” or “little potato,”
as the name Trudeau sounds similar to the
Mandarin word for potato.

Via the Global News:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is finishing

up his trip to China, where he earned the
affectionate nickname “little potato.”
The primary goal of the trip has been to
strengthen business ties with China, the
world’s second-largest economy…
.

121
 LITTLE MACRON Leaves Print
On President Trump’s Hand After Tense Handshake…
WTH Frenchie?
By Cristina Laila
June 10, 2018, 1:10 Pm

French President Emanuel Macron

challenged President Donald Trump on
Thursday after the US president hit the
European Union on their unfair trade
policies with the United States.
It took only a few hours for President
Donald Trump to respond.
On Saturday, President Trump and
French President Macron came face to
face in Canada for the G7 Summit and
they had another tense handshake.

Trump and Macron have a history of tense handshakes.

Trump manhandles Macron in Brussels at the NATO

Summit:

122
 Sweet Justice=> Rudy Giuliani: Comey Could Be
Prosecuted Based On IG Report
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 2:59 Pm

Sweet justice! “I think the report of Horowitz, the

Former New York City Mayor and Trump Attorney Rudy
Giuliani told radio host John Catsimatidis that Dirty Cop
James Comey could be indicted based on the findings in
the IG report.
[inspector general], and the Justice
Department will confirm that Comey acted
improperly with with regard to the Hillary
Clinton investigation,” Giuliani said an
interview with radio host John Catsimatidis.
“The first thing we are going to get is a
report from Inspector General Horowitz on
Comey’s handling of Hillary, which I think is
going to be very very critical of Comey, as
it should be,” Giuliani continued. “Comey,
really, has a chance of being prosecuted as
a result of, but we’ll see.”
James Comey was just spouting off
against President Trump again this
weekend.

The Hill reported:

President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani

said on Sunday that he thinks former FBI
Director James Comey could be
prosecuted as a result of a report from the
Justice Department’s (DOJ) internal
watchdog that is expected to be released
next week.
.

123
 David Frum: Trump Is Our ‘Punishment’
For Terrible Citizens Not Liking The News
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 10, 2018 4:10 PM EDT
Trump Derangement Syndrome is a very real affliction
that plagues many in the liberal media and many in the
anti-Trump crowd. During an appearance on CNN’s
Reliable Sources on Sunday, David Frum, a faux
Republican and editor for the left-leaning Atlantic, showed
off how advanced his TDS was when he decried President
Trump ahead of the historic North Korea summit as a cruel
“punishment” against the American people for being
irresponsible and hating the news media.
CNN host Brian Stelter originally asked Frum to comment
on President Trump’s criticism of CNN while at the press
conference at the G7 summit in Canada. Of course, Frum
suggested Trump’s words somehow gave cover to dictators
to abuse the press. He then shifted gears and started
trashing Americans who were “fatigued” of the news.
“If your child is feverishly ill, it can be
very fatiguing to sit by her bedside and
take care of her but it's what you do
because that's your duty and, I think,
your responsibility and it's also a
source of satisfaction to you,” he
scolded the public. “If your country is ill,
you have the same responsibility.”
According to Frum,
“We got Donald Trump in the first place
as a punishment for not being good
enough citizens.”
That’s right, Trump wasn’t elected because he spoke to
Americans who felt forgotten and disenfranchised, it was
because of those irresponsible Americans who didn’t want
124
to listen to the liberal media. What a great message to the
voters as we head into the midterms.
Frum also condescendingly lectured Americans on what he
saw as their responsibility as citizens, including telling
them not to whine about having to watch the news:
And you can't put your responsibilities on
the press and say, “why didn't you make
this easier for me, or more entertaining.
Why didn't you make the news less
frightening than it is? I would like—I would
like a different truth, please.” The job of the
press is to tell you the truth as it is whether
it's good news or not. And then it's your
responsibility as a patriot and a citizen to
accept it and to internalize it and to act on
it.
“And our ability to mitigate the harm he's
going to do to institutions, to alliances, to
the security of the world will depend on our
-- as individuals, willingness to do be better
citizens in the future and that means being
informed citizens. And that's on us, not on
the press,” he continued to opine.
Out of character for Stelter, he pressed Frum on whether or
not it was appropriate for him to push his anti-Trump hate
while the President was overseas and going into the North
Korea summit (aka, the kind of stuff the left complain the
right did with Obama).
“Um. I don't even understand that
question,”
Frum blurted out. “And I don’t either,” mumbled Steven
Brill, journalist, author, and creator of media outlet rater
NewsGuard.
It takes a specially advanced case of Trump Derangement
Syndrome for someone to rail against the public for not
liking to watch the news and suggesting they were
“punished” for it. With this kind of analysis, is it any
wonder people hate watching the liberal media?
The transcript is below:
CNN
Reliable Sources
June 10, 2018
11:08:10 AM Eastern
(…)
BRIAN STELTER: David, how unusual is it for an American
president to make fun of the press or criticize the press not just
when he's home but also when he’s abroad.
DAVID FRUM: Um. When the President does these things he
empowers every thug, every dictator around the planet.
You know, to your very first question about news fatigue. If your
child is feverishly ill, it can be very fatiguing to sit by her bedside
and take care of her but it's what you do because that's your duty
and, I think, your responsibility and it's also a source of
satisfaction to you. If your country is ill, you have the same
responsibility. Um, you know, there may be things that news
rooms can do differently or better to help people keep better track
of the stories, but it's also your responsibility as a citizen.
And you can't put your responsibilities on the press and say,
“why didn't you make this easier for me, or more entertaining.
Why didn't you make the news less frightening than it is? I would
like—I would like a different truth, please.” The job of the press is
to tell you the truth as it is whether it's good news or not. And
then it's your responsibility as a patriot and a citizen to accept it
and to internalize it and to act on it.
In many ways, we got Donald Trump in the first place as a
punishment for not being good enough citizens. And our ability to
mitigate the harm he's going to do to institutions, to alliances, to
the security of the world will depend on our -- as individuals,
willingness to do be better citizens in the future and that means
being informed citizens. And that's on us, not on the press.
125
STELTER: You wrote to a very bruising piece earlier today for
The Atlantic about what happened at the G7 meeting. What I’m
wondering, David, is whether you thought about keeping your
powder dry at this moment in time when Trump is heading into
this key meeting with the North Korean dictator. Is it appropriate
right now to be so aggressive, to be so critical of Trump ahead of
this summit?
FRUM: Um. I don't even understand that question.
STEVEN BRILL: And I don’t either.
FRUM: Um. I-I-I-I had a chance to get inside the meeting a little
bit and to tell people what had happened.
STELTER: Right.
FRUM: Um. The Trump people want to, I think, suggest that just
as the Canadians, although they didn't, burn down the White
House, it will be Justin Trudeau fault if Trump's summit in
Singapore isn't something Trump can package as a success.
And I think of the things—and I've also written about this –
people need to understand the difference between actual
success that secures the security of the world and the peace of
the world, and what Trump is going to pass off, which will actually
be a tremendous, which is actually a series of concessions to the
North Koreans that will make the United States less safe just for
the photo-op.
STELTER: So you’re saying, don’t be fooled by the photo-op. But
I think the broader issue is the idea of journalism and patriotism.
Steven Brill, you've talked about this for many years. Journalists,
American journalists, they still have a sense of patriotism. And
I've heard people on TV saying we're all rooting for this to go
well. That's what I mean when I say is it appropriate at this
moment.
BRILL: There’s a difference between rooting for it to go well and
saying it’s gone well when it hasn’t gone well. It’s like saying let’s
root for victory in Vietnam as opposed to reporting “we’re
winning, we’re winning, we’re winning in Vietnam” when we’re
not. That’s hardly patriotic.
STELTER: Must tell the truth about what's actually happening.
BRILL: Yeah.
(…)
 Candace Owens Goes Off On Ellen Show Bullies:
“Don’t Ever Forget That Liberals Are Frauds”
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 5:13 Pm

Candace Owens unleashed on the bullies with a series of

tweets.

Candace Owens: One of the most bizarre things about my

twitter life is how regularly I am stalked and insulted by
@TheEllenShow producers.

This is a woman who regularly champions bullying as one

of her biggest societal concerns.

Don’t ever forget that liberals are frauds.

Candace Owens is obviously a powerful
conservative voice.

Candace followed this up with two more

shots at the Ellen Show bullies.
She is turning heads.

So it was inevitable that the left would

start hurling insults at the woman.

On Sunday Candace Owens had enough of the abuse from

the producers of the Ellen Show.

126
 State Democrat Parties Accused Of Illegally
Funneling $84 Million Into Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
By Cristina Laila
June 10, 2018, 5:40 Pm
As many as 40 state Democrat parties
are implicated in a large scheme to
circumvent campaign finance laws in
order to illegally funnel money to Hillary
Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.
A federal lawsuit filed in a Virginia court this week by
attorney Dan Backer accused as many as 40 state
Democrat parties of illegally funneling $84 million into
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
“You had individuals giving $300,000.
They’re not doing it because they care
about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party.
They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy
influence with Hillary Clinton,” Dan Backer
told the Las Vegas Review Journal.
Attorney Dan Backer told the paper he filed the lawsuit
after the FEC ignored a deadline for taking action
stemming from a previous complaint.
127
Various spokesmen for state Democrat parties pushed back
on the lawsuit claiming it’s a publicity stunt to distract
from problems plaguing the Republican party.
As The Gateway Pundit reported in
December, Hillary Clinton’s campaign
and the DNC got hit with their second
FEC complaint.
The complaint alleged Hillary and the DNC used state
chapters as strawmen to go around campaign donation
limits and ultimately laundered the money [$84 million]
back to her presidential campaign.
CDP (Committee to Defend the President) counsel Dan
Backer points to a SCOTUS case that first recognized this
exact practice as illegal.
CDP counsel Dan Backer said the scheme was a flagrant
violation of a Supreme Court ruling that determined such
moves were illegal — and broke FEC campaign
contribution rules which state that an individual can
contribute only $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign.
[SCOTUS] first recognized these practices were illegal
when it ruled in a 2014 case involving Shaun McCutcheon,
a businessman and electrical engineer from suburban
Birmingham, Ala., who created the Conservative Action
Fund PAC. McCutcheon filed suit against the FEC
challenging federal campaign contribution limits. It was
Backer who assisted in filing the suit.
According to the complaint filed, previous reports showed
transactions where the Hillary Victory Fund
disbursed contributions to its state party committee
members and they would receive the money on the same
day.
The HVF would also allegedly disburse
funds to up to 40 state parties at the same
time, and those parties would send the
money back within 24 hours, Fox News
reported.
This FEC complaint parallels Donna Brazile’s account
outlined in her explosive book, ‘Hacks’ where the former
interim DNC Chairwoman alleges Hillary took complete
control over the DNC.
Hillary Clinton is an expert at money laundering. Just look
to the Clinton Foundation to see where she got the idea.
128
The FBI raided Trump’s personal attorney over $130,000
‘hush payment’ to Stormy Daniels alleging the payment to
be a possible violation of campaign finance laws.
Where’s the FBI raid into Hillary’s cronies over the
alleged $84 million campaign finance violation?
 Navarro Goes Scorched Earth
Attacking Trudeau Over Comments On Trump
— ‘Special Place In Hell’
Henry Rodgers | Political Reporter
6:30 PM 06/10/2018

“I highlighted directly to the president that

Canadians did not take it lightly that the
United States has moved forward with
significant tariffs on our steel and aluminum
industry,” Trudeau said in a Saturday
speech. “Particularly, [they] did not take
lightly that it’s for a national security reason
that for Canadians, who stood shoulder to
shoulder with American soldiers in far off
lands in conflicts from the First World War
onward, it’s kind of insulting.”

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro blasted Canadian Navarro called Trudeau’s decision “one of the worst
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in a Sunday interview for political miscalculations” in modern Canadian history,
his negative comments towards President Donald Trump. saying all Trudeau had to do was “take the win.”

“There’s a special place in hell for any WATCH:

foreign leader that engages in bad faith
diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump
and then tries to stab him in the back on
the way out the door,” Navarro said to
Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.” “And
that’s what bad faith Justin Trudeau did
with that stunt press conference.”
Navarro’s comments come as Trudeau criticized Trump
after he left the G7 summit, saying that Canada would
retaliate if the U.S. does not remove the recently
implemented tariffs. Trudeau trashed Trump’s decision to
place tariffs on steel and aluminum from U.S. allies,
calling it “insulting.”
.

129
 Susan Rice: Trump’s Calls To Readmit
Russia To G7 ‘Disgraceful,’ ‘Outrageous’ (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 10, 2018, 8:22 Pm
Trump’s insistence that Russia should be allowed back
into the international partnership is “disgraceful,” Rice
lamented Sunday on CBS’ Face the Nation..
National Security Adviser to former President Obama,
Susan Rice, repudiated President Trump Sunday after
Trump called on Russia to be readmitted to G7.
Russia was expelled from the group then known as G8
(Group of Eight) in 2014, after the majority of member
countries allied against its annexation of Crimea — the
first violation of a European country’s borders since World
War II.
Trump first expressed support for Russia’s readmission
into the G-7 on the White House lawn Friday before
departing for the G7 summit in Canada.
“Whether you like it or not, and it may not
be politically correct, but we have a world
to run,” he said. “And in the G-7, which
used be the G-8, they threw Russia out.
They should let Russia come back in
because we should have Russia at the
negotiating table.”
The president doubled down on Saturday upon his
departure from the summit for Singapore, blasting the
Obama administration for allowing Russia to annex
Crimea.
Obama,
“was the one that let Crimea get away. He
allowed Russia to take Crimea. I may have
had a much different attitude,” Trump said.
“I think it would be an asset to have Russia
back in. I think it would be good for the
world. I think it would be good for Russia. I
think it would be good for the United
States. I think it would be good for all of the
countries of the current G7. I think the G8
would be better.”
.
130
“Rather than understand Russia is our
adversary, Russia had taken on behavior
that is absolutely reprehensible. For the
president of the United States to suggest
all is forgotten, that that doesn’t matter, that
we are fine with one country annexing
another country’s sovereign territory and
we should just welcome them with open
arms into a community of democracies is
outrageous,” she said.”It’s a disgraceful
statement. The fact of the matter is Russia
had invaded Georgia. It then had invaded
Ukraine. We rallied the entire European
Union and many other partners to impose
tough sanctions on Russia for its
annexation. We supported the Ukrainian
government to build up its defensive
military capacity, and along with our G7
partners, we agreed that Russia should no
longer be part of this community of the G8.”
“That’s outrageous,” she continued. “The
United States has long upheld international
law. It was the most brazen violation of
another country’s sovereignty that’s
occurred in recent years. For the president
of the United States to blame his
predecessor rather than to understand that
Russia is our adversary — Russia has
taken on behavior that is absolutely
reprehensible, including being responsible
for shooting civilian aircraft out of the sky
and killing hundreds of people.
 Democratic Congressman Does The Unthinkable —
Backs Trump In Trade Dispute With Trudeau
Henry Rodgers | Political Reporter
8:51 PM 06/10/2018
Illinois Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi joined
President Donald Trump and White House advisers in
blasting Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for
feuding with Trump during the G7 summit, in a statement
released Sunday.
“While I have serious concerns about
President Trump’s approach to trade talks
with Canada, Prime Minister Trudeau has
placed our trade relationship with Canada
at risk by publicly feuding with President
Trump on the world stage,” Krishnamoorthi
said in a statement posted on his website.
The Democratic congressman said Trudeau is
“sabotaging” world leaders instead of coming to a
consensus on trade. Krishnamoorthi’s comments come as
Trudeau criticized Trump after he left the G7 summit,
.
131
saying that Canada would retaliate if the U.S. does not
remove the recently implemented tariffs. Trudeau trashed
Trump’s decision to place tariffs on steel and aluminum
from U.S. allies, calling it “insulting.”
“Prime Minister Trudeau is sabotaging that
cause by driving both sides into their
corners instead of encouraging a more
diplomatic dialogue. Prime Minister
Trudeau may reap some political benefit
through feuding with President Trump, but
by engaging with the President on the
terms he has so far, instead of on mutually
productive ones, he is imperiling the
economic well-being of millions of
Canadians and
Americans,” Krishnamoorthi’s statement
continued.
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro had a much
stronger message for Trudeau, saying earlier Sunday on
Fox News that “there’s a special place in hell for any
foreign leader that engages in bad faith diplomacy with
President Donald J. Trump and then tries to stab him in the
back on the way out the door.”
Trump called Trudeau “Very dishonest &
weak” in a tweet Saturday and accused
him of making “false statements at his
news conference.”
 Trump Continues To Defend American Workers:
Blasts Canada, Justin Trudeau, EU And Germany For
Unfair Trade Policies With US
By Jim Hoft
June 10, 2018, 9:18 Pm

Union had a $151 Billion Surplus-should pay much more

for Military!… Germany pays 1% (slowly) of GDP
towards NATO, while we pay 4% of a MUCH larger GDP.
Does anybody believe that makes sense? We protect
Europe (which is good) at great financial loss, and then get
unfairly clobbered on Trade. Change is coming!

President Donald Trump took more

swipes at Canadian Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau and Canada over trade
issues on Sunday night from Singapore
as he prepared for his historic summit
with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un.

President Trump upset the Group of Seven meeting in

Canada by first agreeing to a group statement on trade only
to withdraw from it while complaining that he had been
blindsided by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s
comments after he departed early for Singapore.

On Sunday night President Trump

continued to take swipes at the
globalists.

President Trump: Fair Trade is now to be called Fool

Trade if it is not Reciprocal. According to a Canada
release, they make almost 100 Billion Dollars in Trade
with U.S. (guess they were bragging and got caught!).
Minimum is 17B. Tax Dairy from us at 270%. Then Justin
acts hurt when called out! Why should I, as President of
the United States, allow countries to continue to make
Massive Trade Surpluses, as they have for decades, while
our Farmers, Workers & Taxpayers have such a big and
unfair price to pay? Not fair to the PEOPLE of America!
$800 Billion Trade Deficit… And add to that the fact that
the U.S. pays close to the entire cost of NATO-protecting
many of these same countries that rip us off on Trade (they
pay only a fraction of the cost-and laugh!). The European

132
 ‘F*** Trump!’ Robert DeNiro Curses President
At Tony Awards As Trump Tries To
Prevent Nuclear War
By Kristinn Taylor
June 10, 2018, 11:10 Pm

Actor Robert DeNiro cursed President Donald Trump live from the Tonys audience.) It’s no longer
on stage at the internationally broadcast Tony awards ‘down with Trump’, it’s ‘f*** Trump!'”
Sunday night, saying twice,

“F*** Trump!”

The 72nd annual Tony Awards honoring stage

performances was held at Radio City Music Hall in New
York City and broadcast by CBS, which bleeped DeNiro’s
profanity while some other outlets around the world did
not.

President Trump is in Singapore for a high stakes meeting

with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un in an effort to prevent a
nuclear war with the rogue communist nation by
pressuring it to give up its nuclear weapons and ballistic
missiles.

DeNiro was on stage to introduce a performance by Bruce

Springsteen who performed a version of My Hometown
from his Broadway show, Springsteen on Broadway.
DeNiro praised Springsteen, who is part of the anti-Trump
‘resistance’,

““Bruce, you can rock the house like

nobody else. And even more important in
these perilous times, you rock the vote,
always fighting for, in your own words,
‘Truth, transparency, and integrity in
government.’ Boy, do we need that now.”
The Tony Awards audience gave DeNiro a standing ovation.
(Quote via Variety.)
“I’m gonna say one thing: F*** Trump!
(Long, loud cheers and standing ovation

133
 ‘Con-Artist Son Of A Bitch’ – UNHINGED ROBERT
Deniro Blasts Trump In Profane-Laced Speech
To High School Students
By Alicia Powe
June 10, 2018, 11:25 Pm

States,” he said. That he’s afflicted with a

narcissistic personality disorder.”
“That he’s a congenital liar. A mean-
spirited, soulless, amoral, abusive con-
artist son of a bitch. Fuck Donald Trump,”
he continued. “And I say this, cause I am
not political, but I am now. You guys are
the future.”

Robert DeNiro used an awards ceremony speech for high

school students this week to go on a profane rant about
President Trump, even comparing the president to Nazi
leader Adolph Hitler.

Trump and Republicans in Congress have a problem

telling the “truth,” DeNiro warned while addressing
student recipients of the Rosemary Breslin American
Writer Award in New York.
“What does the truth even mean today? I
mean, if you’re Donald Trump it doesn’t
mean anything. If you’re cowardly
Republican enablers in Congress you don’t
let the truth stand in the way of pathetically
clinging to power,” he said as the audience
laughed and applauded. “Our country is led
by a president who believes he can make
up his own truth. And we have a word for
that — bullshit.”
The 72-year-old Godfather star argued Trump’s mental
health makes him unfit for office.
“You might say, as have many
professionals, that Trump manifests a
serious mental illness that renders him
psychologically incapable of discharging
duties of the President of the United
.
DeNiro, who threatened to punch Trump in the face during
the 2016 election, then argued the president is no different
than Adolf Hitler, whose leadership of Nazi Germany
during World War II led to mass genocide that killed over
60 million people.
“We’re in a dangerous situation… with
Hitler, with other despots, people didn’t
take them seriously, they laughed at them,”
he remarked. “And then what happened,
they turned around and it was too late. We
can’t let that happen in this country and you
guys are the ones to do it.”
Some members of the audience continued to cheer as
DeNiro slighted the president. But others were turned off.
“Inappropriate,” one woman could be heard
interjecting. “What does this have to do
with the kids?”

134
 Ken Starr: Trump ‘Clearly
Has The Authority’ To Fire Mueller
Julia Nista | General Assignment Reporter
12:54 AM 06/11/2018

Ken Starr, the independent prosecutor for former President
Bill Clinton, said President Trump “clearly has the
authority” to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller in an
interview Sunday.
WATCH:
.
On CBS’s “Face The Nation,” Starr said Trump “clearly
has the authority to direct the firing, if not a direct firing
himself” of Mueller, but that he has not heard of any clear
intention from the administration to do so. Starr added that
it is not a question of legitimacy of power but rather it is a
political question about facing the consequences of firing
the special counsel.
“It would be, I think, but it’s a political
question,” Starr said. “I don’t think it’s
obstruction of justice, and I disagree with
those who seem to find obstruction of
justice and almost anything that the
president has done.”
“But it certainly would be, I think, a political
firefight of the highest order because you
have people in both parties saying that this
is an authorized investigation, let it run its
course,” Starr continued.

135
 House Intel Chairman Nunes Gives DOJ Until Tuesday To
Hand Over Documents On FBI’s Trump Campaign Spy
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 7:37 Am
House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Devin Nunes (R-CA) gave the Justice
Department until Tuesday to provide
documents on the FBI’s informant
inside the Trump campaign.
The DOJ has until Tuesday to act on the
request.
The Department of Justice continues to ignore requests
from Congress on their actions against candidate Trump
during the 2016 election.
FOX News reported:
House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has given the
Justice Department until Tuesday to
provide access to documents concerning
the FBI’s alleged informant looking into any
.
136
Russian ties to President Trump’s 2016
campaign.
In a letter sent Friday to Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein, Nunes said the
records should be provided to all
committee members “and designated staff”
rather than just the so-called “Gang of
Eight” — which refers to Republican and
Democratic leaders in both houses of
Congress as well as top lawmakers from
the intelligence panels.
“DOJ continues to obfuscate and delay its
production using an array of tactics, such
as incorrectly categorizing the requested
documents as Gang-of-Eight-level material
in order to limit access,” wrote Nunes,
referring to an April 30 subpoena for the
documents. “Such conduct by DOJ is
unacceptable because the Gang-of-Eight is
a legal fiction that has no basis outside of
the confines of Presidential approval and
reporting of covert actions.”
Nunes also wrote,
“Your continued refusal to permit Members
of Congress and designated staff to review
the requested documents is obstruction of
a lawful Congressional investigation.”
 Top Democrat Who Rigged Dem Primary
Calls President Trump A “Vile Wack Job”
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 8:08 Am

Top Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz rigged the

Democratic Primary against Bernie Sanders. She was a Imran Awan and his wife Alvi
staunch Hillary supporter. It was her turn. reportedly struck a plea deal this week.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz stepped down as DNC Attorney General Jeff Sessions is refusing to bring up
Chairwoman after Wikileaks revealed her actions to rig the charges against Wasserman Shultz’s IT expert Imran
primary. Awan.

The Awan brothers’ server with much of the key evidence

to the case went missing this past year.

Wasserman Schultz hopes Democrats will take Congress

in November so they can bury the Awan scandal.

This week Wasserman Schultz called President Trump a

“vile wack job.”

The Shark Tank reported:

Wasserman Schultz once took issue with

then Republican Congressman Allen West
Wasserman Schultz is also concerned that the House for calling her “vile and despicable” on the
investigation of her very close IT “professional” Imran House floor.
Awan will come back to bite her.
Now ‘DWS’ is calling President Trump the
very same offense word West called her
Imran Awan worked for Debbie
several years back.
Wasserman Schultz for thirteen years
since she came into office in 2004 as a In front of a group of Haitian-American
Florida representative. Democrats in Sunrise Florida, the Sun
Sentinel tweeted that Wasserman Schultz
Imran and his two Pakistani brothers managed the IT urged the election of the “Democratic
affairs for several Democratic government officials. They Congress” to “be a check on this vile wack
were relieved of their duties in February 2017 on suspicion job who is in the White House.”
that they accessed specific computer networks without If a Republican member of the U.S.
permission, also known as hacking. Congress called President Obama a “vile
wack job” Democrats like Wasserman
Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were Schultz would be asking for their scalps.
barred from computer networks at the
House of Representatives in February
2017.
.

137
 DONALD TRUMP FLASHBACK VIDEO=>
Businessman Trump Prepared For North Korea
Summit In 1999
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 8:20 Am

nation’s number one TV show for years (remember –

You’re Fired!).

But there is also proof that the President has been thinking
about how to deal with North Korea for years.

President Trump was on Meet the Press nearly 20 years

ago where he provided his ideas about North Korea.

Donald Trump:

The biggest problem this world has is

President Trump was correct when he
recently said that he has been preparing
for the North Korea summit his entire
life. In fact, there is video evidence to
prove it.
On Friday the President said –
President Donald Trump expressed confidence Friday that
he is fully prepared for his planned summit with North
Korean leader Kim Jong Un, but with only days to go until
the historic event, Democrats and experts still have
reservations about his negotiating strategy.
nuclear proliferation. And we have this
country out there, North Korea, that is sort
of wacko. Which is not a bunch of
dummies and they are going out and they
are developing nuclear weapons… And
wouldn’t it be good to sit down and really
negotiate something? And if that
negotiation doesn’t work you’re better to
solve the problem now than solve it later.

“I always believe in preparation, but I’ve

been preparing all my life,”

Trump told reporters outside the White House on Friday

morning before leaving for the G7 summit in Canada. He
is scheduled to leave there on Saturday morning to travel
to Singapore, where he is set to meet with Kim Tuesday to
discuss shutting down the reclusive regime’s nuclear
weapons program.

The President is right and there is video evidence to prove

it. Not only has he been negotiating mega deals for a living
on some of the priciest and most beautiful real estate
properties on earth, he also used these skills to win the US
election for President – beating 17 Republican hopefuls
and the crooked Clinton machine. The President also had a
best seller (The Art of the Deal) and held one of the

138
 The famous Dilbert cartoon writer Scott Adams notes for
The President was also on CNN in 1999 where he again Americans not to worry –
shared his ideas about North Korea –

Yes, President Trump has been

preparing for June 12th, 2018, for a
lifetime. Video evidence proves it.

139
Dinesh D’Souza To Compare President Trump To Abe
Lincoln In Upcoming Film:
“Death Of A Nation”
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 9:37 Am
Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza
announced his latest project recently to
The Hollywood Reporter.
D’Souza links President Trump to
President Abraham Lincoln – the Great
Emmancipator – in his latest project:
Death of a Nation.
The movie is set for an August 3rd release.
Via The Hollywood Reporter:
Dinesh has been working on the project
for a year, before he was pardoned by
President Trump earlier this month.
140
In a move that could raise the suspicions of
his detractors, recently pardoned Dinesh
D’Souza tells The Hollywood Reporter that
his next movie will liken Donald Trump to
Abraham Lincoln, including a poster that
morphs an image of the two U.S.
presidents.
The poster, unveiled here for the first time,
features a U.S. flag, images of slavery, the
Civil War, modern-day university riots,
Lincoln’s and Trump’s face combined as
one and the upcoming film’s title: Death of
a Nation.
The poster also includes D’Souza’s name
and that of Gerald R. Molen, advertised as
the Academy Award-winning producer of
the two Steven Spielberg films Schindler’s
List and Jurassic Park.
“Death of a Nation draws a provocative
analogy between Lincoln and Trump,”
D’Souza tells THR. “Not that they’re the
same people, but that they’ve fallen into the
same situation. Not since 1865 have
Democrats so dramatically refused to
 accept the outcome of a presidential
election.”
D’Souza acknowledges that the optics of a
pro-Trump documentary will be deemed
suspicious in some circles, given the
president pardoned him May 31 for
violating campaign finance laws.
“We’ve been working on the film for more
than a year and commissioned the artwork
two months ago. Trump had no inkling of
the art or the theme of the movie when he
pardoned me,” says D’Souza.
Can Trump save America a second
time?

141
 Senator Feinstein Admits To Ignoring ‘Mistreatment’ Of
Illegal Immigrants Under Obama (VIDEO)
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 11, 2018, 10:42 Am

Appearing on CNN on Friday, Feinstein was questioned by

Jake Tapper about the recent viral photo shared by many
Democrats of children in a holding cell. The photo was
being used to condemn President Trump — but it was
taken during the Obama era.

“There were a lot of things done to

undocumented immigrants that the
immigrant community was very upset about
during the Obama years, that Democrats
didn’t seem as outspoken about,” Tapper
stated. “What do you say to people who are
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) claimed that she “didn’t saying, ‘where was all this activism during
really know enough” about the “mistreatment” of illegal the Obama years?'”
immigrants to pay attention to it during the eight years that
Barack Obama was in office.
Senator Feinstein then admitted that she had previously
ignored the issue, and claimed that it is worse now.

“I don’t believe that it was nearly to the

extent that it is today. And candidly, I didn’t
really know enough about it at that time to
focus on it,” Feinstein said.

142
Trump-Kim Meeting Times Moved Up: President To Meet
With North Korean Leader At 9 PM ET On Monday Night
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 11:16 Am

The White House announce this

morning that the official Trump-Kim
meetings have been moved up to 9 PM
Eastern time tonight which is Tuesday
morning in Singapore.

CNBC reported:

143
 Here is video of President Trump’s
meeting with Singapore leader Lee
Hssien Loong this morning.
Thank you Prime Minister Lee Hsien
Loong!
pic.twitter.com/8MMYGuOj8Q
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
June 11, 2018
“>President Trump’s schedule for the next
36 hours.
Trump’s meeting with Kim begins at 9 PM
on Monday night.
The President’s staff will join him for
meetings after the private meeting with Kim
Jong Un.

Here is
.

144
 Crooked Hillary Attacks President Trump
As He Tries To Prevent Nuclear War With North Korea
By Cristina Laila
June 11, 2018, 11:51 Am

On Monday, Hillary Clinton told her millions of Twitter

followers to flood Congress with phone calls over the
DOJ’s recent decision to deem key pieces of Obamacare
“unconstitutional.”

Hillary attacked the President just hours before his historic

meeting with Kim Jong-Un. Brilliant.

Hillary Clinton tweeted: Here we go again. The Trump

Admin is trying to take away your health care by ending
protections for ppl w/ pre-existing conditions. It will hurt
President Trump arrived in Singapore millions of Americans. Spread the word. Call your
Congress member & tell them to stand up for you: 202-
over the weekend for a historical, high
224-3121
stakes meeting with North Korea’s Kim
Jong Un in an effort to negotiate the de-
nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
The White House announced this
morning that the official Trump-Kim
meetings have been moved up to
Monday, 9 PM Eastern time, which is
Tuesday morning in Singapore.
Twice-failed presidential hopeful,
Crooked Hillary Clinton attacked
President Trump Monday morning, as
he prepares for the high stakes meeting
in an effort to prevent nuclear war.

The Clinton administration’s failed North Korea policy of

This is another reason why Hillary $4 billion in energy aid included two nuclear light-water
Clinton lost the election. reactors in 1994. No thank you, Hillary. We’ve had
enough of Clinton failure.
She has no self-awareness; she doesn’t care about
Americans.

145
 The world awaits the Trump-Kim
meetings while Crooked Hillary goes on
the offense against the President. Let
that sink in.

146
 MSNBC Hack On Deniro’s “F**K Trump” Speech:
“I Shout Some Of Those Words In The Shower” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 12:08 Pm

Actor Robert DeNiro cursed President Donald Trump live The Tony Awards audience gave DeNiro a standing
on stage at the internationally broadcast Tony awards ovation.
Sunday night, saying twice,
And they wonder why Middle America tunes them out?
“F*** Trump!”
On Monday morning MSNBC hack
The 72nd annual Tony Awards honoring stage Stephanie Ruhle responded to actor
performances was held at Radio City Music Hall in New Robert De Niro’s “F*ck Trump”
York City and broadcast by CBS, which bleeped DeNiro’s comments.
profanity while some other outlets around the world did
She screams F-Trump too.
not.
Via Breitbart:

Stephanie Ruhle: “I’m sure I shout some

of those words in the shower. But when
you think about what Americans care
about, they care about the economy. They
care about health care. They care about
issues. And many of them believe, whether
he is or isn’t, that he’s delivering for them.
When you see celebrities say I hope the
economy bottoms out to get rid of Trump, I
think that helps Trump.”

147
 MSNBC Fears Trump Will Get
‘Winning News Cycle’ From North Korea Summit
By Kyle Drennen
June 11, 2018 1:21 PM EDT
On her 9:00 a.m. ET hour show on Monday, MSNBC
anchor Stephanie Ruhle derisively labeled President
Trump’s upcoming peace summit with North Korean
leader Kim Jong-un as nothing more than
“a brilliant PR stunt that doesn’t get us
anywhere,”
but fretted to her panel of liberal pundits that he could get
political gain from the meeting,
“does this end up being a strong talking
point for President Trump?”
MSNBC Political Analyst Elise Jordan predicted:
“Well, I think he’s going to extend the
pageantry for quite some time and this is
going to be the start of – ”
Ruhle quipped:
“He loves pageants.”
Jordan continued by warning that the meeting could be
beneficial to Trump:
“So while he will say that and proclaim that
this is a great success, he might not have
that much to show for it, but he is going
to have this to use as an ongoing
talking point throughout the 2018
midterm season.”
148
Left-wing SiriusXM radio host Mark Thompson chimed in
and blasted the notion that the President might be
nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize if the sit-down was
successful:
He likes to play self-victimization to his base. So what he’s
going to say is,
“They gave Obama a Nobel and they won’t
give me one.” Even though he’s done
nothing to earn a Nobel. And this meeting
alone won’t get it done, it’s a photo op. As
the reporters explained – the two reporters
earlier – Kim Jong-un wants this photo
op as much as Trump does. It
legitimizes him as this mystical god-like
figure to his own people, which is
wrong. And then Trump can do the
same thing to pretend that he’s worthy
of a Nobel.
Ruhle forgot to ask Thompson what Barack Obama ever
did to “earn a Nobel” when he was handed one simply for
being elected president.
Thompson went on to suggest that Trump was just
engaging in the high-stakes foreign policy mission because
he was “weakened”:
“Lastly, there’s also a history of world
leaders who themselves in trouble, meeting
with weakened U.S. presidents. Brezhnev
kissed Nixon, China met with Nixon. And
so, this is just history repeating itself.”
Ruhle marveled in response:
 “You are such the historian. Every time you Also, to claim that Democrats are victims of media bias is
come, I'm more impressed.” laughable. MSNBC devoted hours of fawning air time to
President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran and visiting with
Wrapping up the discussion minutes later, Ruhle asked her Cuban dictator Raul Castro. Where was the skepticism
guests: then?

“Okay, then quick, there will be a grand Here is a transcript of portions of the June 11 panel
headline. Will there be a substantive deal discussion:
this time tomorrow?” Former Obama State
Department Ambassador Wendy Sherman 9:12 AM ET
dismissed the idea: “I don’t think there will
be a substantive deal, of course not.” (...)
Jordan agreed: “I don’t see how it's
possible.” Thompson predictably joined the
STEPHANIE RUHLE: If this is going to be a brilliant PR stunt that
consensus: “No, absolutely not.”
doesn’t get us anywhere, does this end up being a strong talking
point for President Trump? Where he says, “You gave President
Ruhle then worried: Obama a Nobel Peace Prize, what did he do? I got this meeting,
and maybe a follow-up.”
“But will it be a winning news cycle for
the president?” Sherman and Jordan
promptly agreed that it would be, while
Thompson sounded the alarm: “If those of
us in journalism allow it to be. We need
to absolutely scrutinize it in the same
way every Democratic president was
scrutinized going to North Korea. Can’t
be this double standard.”

Sherman joined in the complaining about Democrats

suffering from a media “double standard”:

When Secretary Albright and I went to Pyongyang and

went into this extraordinary stadium event that Kim Jong-il
took us to with thousands of people on the floor doing
gymnastics, thousands in the stands with flip cards
showing us missiles going off, we sat there with tight
smiles on our face because you are diplomats and you
can’t be scowling or walk out of the stadium. But we got
so much criticism. Secretary Albright was castigated right
and left for smiling, for having a toast, for anything that we
did in Pyongyang....to Mark’s point, if a Democratic
president said such things, they would have the
administration up on Capitol Hill tomorrow castigating
them for doing so.
Thompson then proclaimed:
“If Hillary Clinton had won and set up a
meeting with Kim Jong-un, they’d have
articles of impeachment this afternoon.
I’m telling you, that’s exactly what they
would do.”
The notion that there’s real concern that the liberal media
will give Trump overly-positive coverage on anything is
patently absurd. MSNBC is already trying to bash the
President before the summit has even happened.
ELISE JORDAN [MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST]: Well, I think
he’s going to extend the pageantry for quite some time and this is
going to be the start of –
RUHLE: He loves pageants.
JORDAN: Donald Trump – yes, exactly, he loves a pageant, and
an ongoing reality show. So while he will say that and proclaim
that this is a great success, he might not have that much to show
for it, but he is going to have this to use as an ongoing talking
point throughout the 2018 midterm season.
RUHLE: Mark?
MARK THOMPSON [SIRIUSXM PROGRESS RADIO HOST]:
Oh, I would agree. He likes to play self-victimization to his base.
So what he’s going to say is, “They gave Obama a Nobel and
they won’t give me one.” Even though he’s done nothing to earn
a Nobel. And this meeting alone won’t get it done, it’s a photo op.
As the reporters explained – the two reporters earlier – Kim Jong-
un wants this photo op as much as Trump does. It legitimizes him
as this mystical god-like figure to his own people, which is wrong.
And then Trump can do the same thing to pretend that he’s
worthy of a Nobel.

149
Remember, there’s one other prism. Respectfully, Ambassador
[Wendy Sherman]. And that is his obsession with Obama.
Obama said to him in their only White House meeting, “North
Korea needs to be a priority.” So he got that. So he has to go out
of his way to try to prove Obama differently. And he gets his
advice from his de facto chief of staff Sean Hannity. Who, when
Obama was in office, ridiculed and shamed Obama for even
thinking about meeting with the Kim regime. So there is a double
standard.
Lastly, there’s also a history of world leaders who themselves in
trouble, meeting with weakened U.S. presidents. Brezhnev
kissed Nixon, China met with Nixon. And so, this is just history
repeating itself.
RUHLE: You are such the historian. Every time you come, I'm
more impressed.
(...)
9:17 AM ET
RUHLE: Well, the fact that he’s rolling out in 11 hours and they’re
going to have, for the most part, a photo opportunity, does this
signal that President Trump’s team is actually doing all of this
work and he’s there to shake hands, kiss babies, and sign his
name? Which most Republicans would say that’s what they
actually want him to do.
JORDAN: Well, President Trump does not enjoy foreign trips and
he’s made very clear that he wants to –
RUHLE: He seemed to loved Saudi Arabia.
JORDAN: Well, exactly –
RUHLE: He talked about that sword dance.
JORDAN: If his face is on the side of a massive museum, then
yes, he might enjoy it a little bit more. But he usually just tries to
go in and out. I mean, look at what happened this past weekend
in Quebec City with his – with our closest allies at the G-7. So he
is not going to linger and he doesn’t really necessarily care to sit
around and hammer out the arcane details and the nuance of
what the actual agreement would be. That’s for somebody else.
But he’s taking the limelight. He is showing himself running the
show, and with Kim Jong-un.
RUHLE: Mark?
THOMPSON: Well, you know, it remains to be seen what his
team is going to do. I’m – peculiar statements that [Secretary of
State Mike] Pompeo was making this morning about touching
and feeling. Is he going to touch and feel him? He says he’s
going to know in the first minute. He didn’t even know in the first
minute election night that Putin had propped him up to win the
150
election, he didn’t know he was going to be president. So how’s
he going to know what to touch and feel from North Korea?
RUHLE: And to that point, did he know about Mike Flynn, George
Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort, the list goes on of people who the
president, who’s “the best judge,” people he aligned himself with,
who’ve been indicted.
THOMPSON: In the history of diplomacy and sit-downs between
a president and a leader, this is the one that gives me the most
trepidation. He is the least-qualified president to sit alone in a
room with Kim Jung-un and a translator. It’s either going to be of
absolutely no substance or he is going to do something to mess it
up in the same way he’s messed up our relationship with our
allies. He wants us to have two allies, I guess, North Korea and
Russia.
RUHLE: Amazing. While he’s pushing our democratic allies
away, alright.
AMB. WENDY SHERMAN [ALBRIGHT STONEBRIDGE
GROUP, SENIOR COUNSELOR]: I can tell you that his aides will
want the translator’s notes as soon as they come out of the room.
People underestimate the value and the importance of
translators. They take copious notes so that they can keep track
of the translation, and those notes are going to be gold for the
team that’s got to follow up and make something real out of what
this declaration will say.
RUHLE: Okay, then quick, there will be a grand headline. Will
there be a substantive deal this time tomorrow?
SHERMAN: I don’t think there will be a substantive deal, of
course not.
JORDAN: I don’t see how it's possible.
THOMPSON: No, absolutely not.
RUHLE: But will it be a winning news cycle for the president?
SHERMAN: Absolutely.
JORDAN: Of course, as always.
THOMPSON: If those of us in journalism allow it to be. We need
to absolutely scrutinize it in the same way every Democratic
president was scrutinized going to North Korea.
SHERMAN: Indeed.
THOMPSON: Can’t be this double standard. Every other
president was seriously scrutinized on this issue, Trump needs to
– the least experienced one needs to be scrutinized as well.
RUHLE: You know this first hand.
SHERMAN: When Secretary Albright and I went to Pyongyang
and went into this extraordinary stadium event that Kim Jong-il
took us to with thousands of people on the floor doing
gymnastics, thousands in the stands with flip cards showing us
missiles going off, we sat there with tight smiles on our face
because you are diplomats and you can’t be scowling or walk out
of the stadium. But we got so much criticism. Secretary Albright
was castigated right and left for smiling, for having a toast, for
anything that we did in Pyongyang.
And she indeed, as soon as she left, said, “I grew up under
communism, I’m not somebody who sits there with rose-colored
glasses. I know exactly who this real dictator is.” I don’t think we’ll
hear similar words from the president. We’ve heard him say,
“He’s a nice guy, I like him, I’m honored to meet with him.” Truly.
.
151
RUHLE: He also may be saying that just to butter him up to get
him to the table.
SHERMAN: Absolutely, absolutely. He is buttering him up. But
nonetheless, if a Democratic president, to Mark’s point, if a
Democratic president said such things, they would have the
administration up on Capitol Hill tomorrow castigating them for
doing so.
THOMPSON: If Hillary Clinton had won and set up a meeting
with Kim Jong-un, they’d have articles of impeachment this
afternoon. I’m telling you, that’s exactly what they would do.
RUHLE: President Trump may have some aggressive and
negative words to say about Kim Jung-un, we just won’t hear any
of them until about 12 hours, when he’s on a plane, leaving.
Because he’s not going to say it face-to-face, that’s not his lane.
 In Huge Defeat To Leftists,
Supreme Court Rules
In Favor Of Ohio’s Voting Roll Purge
By Cristina Laila
June 11, 2018, 1:27 Pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled 5-
4 Ohio is allowed to purge its voting
rolls of voters from the state’s
registration records if they have not
voted in a few years.
This is a blow to Democrats who rely on
messy voter rolls in order for people to
vote multiple times; Dems also love
their dead voters.
Fox News reported:
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that
Ohio is allowed to purge eligible voters
from the state’s registration records if they
have not cast ballots in a while.
In a 5-4 ruling issued by Justice Samuel
Alito, the high court ruled that Ohio’s law to
trigger the removal of inactive voters from
the state’s registry can be enforced.
State officials argued that the process used
by Ohio for more than 20 years is
152
constitutional and legal, and meant to
ensure election security.
Civil liberties groups challenged the state’s program for
removing thousands of people from voter rolls based on
their failure to vote in recent elections, claiming it violated
the National Voter Registration Act.
But Alito said that Ohio is complying with the National
Voter Registration Act of 1993. At least six other states
have similar rules in place, and Monday’s decision could
lead others to adopt similar procedures.
“It is undisputed that Ohio does not remove
a registrant on change-of-residence
grounds unless the registrant is sent and
fails to mail back a return card and then
fails to vote for an additional four years,”
Alito wrote in his opinion.
He concluded:
“We have no authority to second-guess
Congress or to decide whether Ohio’s
Supplemental Process is the ideal method
for keeping its voting rolls up to date. The
only question before us is whether it
violates federal law. It does not.
Ohio has been purging its voter rolls for over 20 years.
The state removes voters from the rolls after the election
board sends a notice and if the individual hasn’t voted in 4
years.
Justice Alito cited a shocking statistic
that 24 million voter registrations—about
one in eight—are “either invalid or
significantly inaccurate,” and that about
2.75 million people “are said to be
registered to vote on more than one state,”
Fox News reported.
His opinion was supported by Chief Justice John Roberts
and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Neil
Gorsuch.

Judicial Watch has been fighting for cleaner voter rolls in

an effort to restore election integrity.

‘Leftists suffered a big defeat today,’ Fitton

said.

153
 LIBERAL INSANITY: Democrats
Leery If Russia Is Behind Superdelegate Reform
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 2:03 Pm

the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee in

Rhode Island, a majority of that panel
expressed support for dramatically
reducing the power of superdelegates at
the Democratic National Convention by
barring them from having a vote on the
convention’s first ballot.

These people are insane.

Democrats are now leery that Russia

may have infiltrated their discussions
on superdelegate reform.

In a perfect encapsulation of today’s divided and Russia-

obsessed Democratic Party, Democrats are now fighting
over whether “the Putin operation” is bankrolling
superdelegate reform.

The Huffington Post reported:

Momentum is growing within the

Democratic National Committee for a
significant reform to the party’s presidential
nominating process, but the proposed
change has caused a leading California
Democrat to question whether Russian
meddling is behind the effort.
The Californian, Bob Mulholland, could
provide no proof for his claim. But his
comments underscore the resistance the
reform push is expected to encounter from
some party stalwarts.
At issue is the clout exercised by so-called
superdelegates in the party’s presidential
nominating process. At a Friday meeting of
154
According to the RNC: Two years after the 2016 primary
ended, the Democratic Party has still not agreed on rules
that will govern its 2020 presidential nominating process.
One major sticking point – particularly for Bernie
supporters – is whether the party will eliminate its 437
superdelegates.
Congressional Democrats are “seething over” the prospect
of that happening, and tensions are so high that an image
of police beating Rep. John Lewis at Selma’s 1965 voting
rights march is being used to discourage superdelegate
reform.
 James Woods Breaks The Internet
After He Drops Bomb On Obama
And Ben Rhodes
By Cristina Laila
June 11, 2018, 2:31 Pm

On Sunday night President Trump

continued to defend America and take
swipes at the globalists

Clearly Ben Rhodes prefers his former boss’s strategy of

bowing to every foreign leader like a weakling.

James Woods did it again.

Far-left Obama hack Ben Rhodes attacks President Trump

on a regular basis either from his Twitter account or from
his new spot on MSNBC.

James Woods had enough of Ben Rhodes on Monday and

moved in with a kill shot.

Woods hit two birds with one stone and took down Obama
and Ben Rhodes at the same time in a viral tweet.

Ben Rhodes attacked President Trump’s approach to fair

trade with Canada and Europe.

President Trump upset the Group of Seven meeting in

Canada by first agreeing to a group statement on trade only
to withdraw from it while complaining that he had been
blindsided by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s
comments after he departed early for Singapore.

Rhodes tweeted in response to Trump:

The pathetic and embarrassing thing is that
Trump’s approach will end up hurting our
farmers, workers & companies while also
surrendering our global leadership.

155
 James Woods broke the internet after OUCH! This is why we love James
he dropped a MOAB on Obama and Woods!
Rhodes.
Woods tweeted:
Your old boss would bow to a fire hydrant.
Don’t talk about surrendering global
leadership. In fact don’t talk at all.
.

156
 AG Sessions: Domestic Violence And Gang Violence No
Longer Qualify As Sufficient Reason To Grant
Asylum To Immigrants
By Cristina Laila
June 11, 2018, 3:28 Pm
Attorney General Jeff Sessions
announced Monday domestic violence
and gang violence no longer qualify as
sufficient reasons to grant asylum to
immigrants.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced this ruling at an
annual 3-day conference of the Executive Officer for
Immigration Review (EOIR) in Virginia.
In a speech to immigration judges Monday, Attorney
General Jeff Sessions,
“It will be your duty to carry out this ruling.”
“Asylum was never meant to alleviate all
problems, even all serious problems, that
people face every day all over the world,”
Sessions said.
Sessions also said in his speech that the American people
voted for safe secure borders when they elected Trump in
2016:
157
“Let’s be clear: We have a goal. And that
goal is to end the lawlessness that now
exists in our immigration system. The
American people have spoken. They have
spoken in our laws and they have spoken
in our elections. They want a safe, secure
border and a lawful system of immigration
that actually works and serves the national
interest. Thank you for what you do, let’s
deliver this for the American people.”
Asylum applications exploded under the Obama
administration thanks to a dangerous ‘catch and release’
policy.
Obama’s failed policy created a surge in illegal
immigration with thousands of migrants demanding
asylum at the US-Mexico border every year.
In April, a huge caravan of illegal aliens from Central
America marched their way through Mexico to the US
border seeking citizenship, stating gang violence as their
reason to be granted asylum.
Monday’s move by the Justice Department to curb asylum
seekers is a start in the right direction but we still need to
secure our border with a wall.
There are also millions of ‘DREAMERs’ demanding
citizenship because of Obama’s unconstitutional DACA
policy.
 He’s Ready! President Trump Fires Off Early Morning
Tweets From Singapore – Zings “Haters & Losers”
By Cristina Laila
June 11, 2018, 4:57 Pm

matter. We will all know soon whether or not a real deal,

President Trump is ready to go! unlike those of the past, can happen!
The President fired off a pair of very
early morning tweets from Singapore,
communicating directly to the American
people and the world he is already
prepping for his meeting with North
Korea’s Kim Jong Un.
In fact, President Trump has been
preparing for the North Korea summit
his whole life.

The President then fired off a second

tweet and took a shot at the haters and
losers.

Trump tweeted: The fact that I am having a meeting is a

major loss for the U.S., say the haters & losers. We have
our hostages, testing, research and all missle launches have
stoped, (sic) and these pundits, who have called me wrong
from the beginning, have nothing else they can say! We
will be fine!

President Trump arrived in Singapore

over the weekend for a historical, high
stakes meeting with North Korea’s Kim
Jong Un in an effort to negotiate the de-
nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
The White House announced this
morning that the official Trump-Kim
meetings have been moved up to
Monday, 9 PM Eastern time, which is
Tuesday morning in Singapore.  The Clinton administration’s failed North Korea policy
of $4 billion in energy aid included two nuclear light-
The president is up early and full of energy as usual. water reactors in 1994. Thank God Hillary Clinton lost
the election. We’ve had enough of Clinton failure.
President Trump fired off an early morning tweet from  President Obama did NOTHING about North Korea
Singapore and even zinged past presidents who failed to and punted the problem over to President Trump.
take on North Korea in this manner.  President Trump grabbed North Korea by the horns,
resulting in this high stakes meeting in Singapore.
At apprx 5:30 AM local time in Singapore, Trump
tweeted: Meetings between staffs and representatives are Please continue to pray President Trump will successfully
going well and quickly….but in the end, that doesn’t negotiate the de-nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

158
#Nevertrump Republican SPOOKED – Suddenly Spending
Money On Ads To Smear Pro-Trump Primary Opponent
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 5:26 Pm

Politico reported:

GOP Rep. Mark Sanford has spent the

past three years torching President Donald
Trump, firmly establishing himself as a
staunch critic of the commander-in-chief
who, unlike so many others in his party,
never came around.
Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) is a staunch Now he’s suddenly at risk of losing his job
#NeverTrumper. over it.
Sanford is running against Pro-Trump The once seemingly safe former South
Republican state Rep. Katie Arrington in Carolina governor, who’s never lost a bid
the Republican primary. for political office, is sweating in the final
days of his primary race against state Rep.
Sanders went on MSNBC to bash President Trump over Katie Arrington, a political newcomer who’s
his sh*thole comments. cast Sanford as a disloyal Never-Trumper.
Over the past several weeks, Sanford has
launched an 11th-hour TV advertising blitz
going directly after Arrington, a sure
indication that he’s under duress. He’s
barnstorming his Lowcountry district. And
on Sunday, he released a full-page letter to
a local newspaper in which he pleaded with
voters to “look at the list of things I have
gotten done on your behalf” and asked
them to call him on his personal cell phone
if they had any questions.
Sanford is one of a string of Republican
lawmakers under mounting pressure over
their allegiance to the president. Alabama
Sanford is spooked and started Rep. Martha Roby, who vowed not to vote
spending money to smear his for then-candidate Trump after the release
Republican opponent. of the “Access Hollywood” tape in which he
Sanford needs to go. bragged about sexually assaulting women,
has been forced into a primary runoff.
Vote for Katie Arrington.

159
 Breaking: Judge Ellis May Side With Manafort Against
Dirty Cop Robert Mueller And Special Counsel
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 7:01 Pm
In April The Gateway Pundit reported
that the US is now in a constitutional
crisis due to the unconstitutional and
corrupt Mueller investigation kept in
place by corrupt FBI and DOJ
Leadership.
Former Trump Campaign Manager Paul
Manafort may soon be the one to shut it
all down.
Mueller’s illegal Trump-Russia investigation continues to
take corrupt and unconstitutional actions while criminal
activities in Obama’s FBI, DOJ and State Department are
ignored. If there is justice, America will soon have a real
investigation looking into the Obama and Clinton criminal
acts while in office.
Paul Manafort first made arguments in a suit with Robert
Mueller, Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions as Head of the
DOJ, related to illegalities in the way that Rosenstein set
up the Mueller special counsel. Rosenstein’s special
counsel order was not based on a crime and
160
unconstitutionally stated that Mueller could basically look
at anything he wanted to look at. These provisions are
against the law and are now for the courts to settle.
In addition to the above suit, Robert Barnes wrote last
week at Law and Crimes that Mueller’s actions not related
to the 2016 campaign are outside the scope of Jeff
Sessions recusal as AG and therefore unconstitutional –
Paul Manafort‘s legal team brought a motion to dismiss on
Tuesday, noting that Rosenstein could not appoint Mueller
to any investigation outside the scope of the 2016
campaign since Sessions did not recuse himself for
anything outside the campaign. I agree with this take on
Mueller’s authority. If we follow that argument that would
mean Sessions himself has exclusive authority to appoint a
special counsel for non-collusion charges, and Sessions
has taken no such action. Sessions himself should make
that clear to Mueller, rather than await court resolution.
Doing so would remove three of the four areas of inquiry
from Mueller’s requested interview with President Trump.
Sessions formally notifying Mueller that he does not have
authority to act outside of campaign-related cases and
cases related to obstruction of Mueller’s investigation
would be doing what the Constitution compels: enforcing
the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Additionally,
Sessions notifying Mueller that he does not have authority
to act outside of campaign-related cases would be
exercising Sessions’ court-recognized Constitutional
obligation to “direct and supervise litigation” conducted by
the Department of Justice. Furthermore, Sessions notifying
Mueller that he does not have authority to act outside of
campaign-related cases protects against the inappropriate
use of the federal grand jury that defendant Manafort now
rightly complains about.
Sessions limiting Mueller to the 2016 campaign would
also be restoring confidence in democratic institutions, and
restore public faith that democratically elected officials.
One thing to remember about Sessions’
recusal: Sessions only recused himself
from “any existing or future investigations
of any matters related in any way to the
campaigns for President of the United
States.” This recusal letter limits the scope
of Sessions’ recusal to the 2016
 campaigns; it does not authorize Sessions’
recusal for anything beyond that.
Constitutionally, Sessions has a “duty to
direct and supervise litigation” conducted
by the Department of Justice. Ethically,
professionally, and legally, Sessions
cannot ignore his supervisory obligations
for cases that are not related to the
“campaigns for President.”
In April Mueller and Rosenstein
presented to the courts a rebuttal for
Manafort’s latest action – they
presented a previously undisclosed The hearing is taking place before US
memo to a federal court in Washington District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in
supposedly addressing Manafort’s Alexandria, Virginia.
argument. The problem is it doesn’t. — Steve Herman (@W7VOA) May 4, 2018
Now this…
The memo is dated August 2, 2017 and is from Rosenstein
to Mueller supposedly directing Mueller to look into
Manafort actions with a Russian operative perhaps before FOX News attorney Gregg Jarrett told
2016. This however is clearly outside the scope of Lou Dobbs on Monday that Judge Ellis
Sessions’ recusal as argued by Manafort and doesn’t even may still side with Paul Manafort in his
address Manafort’s argument that these actions are not for case against Special Counsel Robert
Mueller to take or Rosenstein to order but are Sessions Mueller and the DOJ.
actions alone as AG.
Via Lou Dobbs Tonight:
Then in May a federal judge agreed with Paul Manafort
that the Mueller witch hunt was out of control and out of
bounds.

161
 Rand Paul: Lindsey Graham Is A
‘Danger To The Country’
By Diana Stancy Correll
June 11, 2018 07:04 PM - Updated Jun 11, 2018, 09:15 PM
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., recently said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is
a "danger to the country." (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, Raad
Adayleh)
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said that his colleague, Sen.
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is a “danger to the country” for
urging that military force be used against North Korea if
President Trump is unable to reach an agreement with the
rogue regime’s leader Kim Jong Un about denuclearizing
the Korean peninsula.
Paul said he would not vote for an Authorization for the
Use of Military Force against North Korea as Graham had
called for over the weekend, just before Trump’s meeting
on Tuesday with Kim in Singapore.
“Lindsey Graham is a danger to the country
by even proposing ideas like authorizing
war with Korea, my goodness,” Paul said in
an interview Monday with CNN’s Wolf
Blitzer. “So that should be something that is
seen as naive and seen as something that
really serious people shouldn't even really
be discussing.”
When asked to elaborate, Paul said that Graham’s world
view that “war is always the answer” has prompted the
U.S. to become involved with conflicts “where it’s not
really clear what the American interests is in those wars.”
“I think sometimes the reaction to our
involvement in those wars has actually
been worse than had we not been involved
at all,” Paul said.
162
Over the weekend, Graham called on Senate Democrats to
support the use of military force against North Korea “if
diplomacy fails” to establish a denuclearization deal on the
Korean peninsula.
"If diplomacy fails, will you support my
efforts to authorize the use of military force
as a last resort to convince North Korea
and China that things are going to be
different this time?" Graham said during an
interview with ABC’s “This Week” on
Sunday.
Graham added that,
“We’ll know diplomatic failure when we see
it,” and said he did not anticipate that
Trump and Kim would sign a deal this
week.
Graham's office did not immediately respond to the
Washington Examiner to provide comment. But Graham
provided a statement to CNN.
"When it comes to fighting radical Islam
and bad actors, Senator Paul is constantly
AWOL," Graham said in a statement to
CNN.
"There is no threat to America that Senator
Paul will not retreat from," he added.
Graham also said that it "is an unacceptable risk" to permit
the rogue regime to maintain nuclear arms that could target
the U.S.
"The only way North Korea will give up their
nuclear program is if they believe military
option is real," Graham said.
Trump landed in Singapore on Sunday and is scheduled to
meet with Kim on Tuesday morning local time.
Trump and other leaders, such as Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, have
characterized the summit as a "getting-to-know-you"
meeting between Trump and Kim.
 US North Korea Peace Talks Made Possible
By USAF Secret Space Program
Written By Dr. Michael Salla
June 11, 2018
On June 12 President Donald Trump meets with North
Korea’s supreme leader, Kim Jong-Un in Singapore to
resolve the confrontation over the latter’s nuclear weapons
program. The on-off-on again meeting has been a surprise
to many believing that the bellicose language used by both
leaders throughout 2017 was a sure sign that a nuclear
confrontation was inevitable.
During Kim’s January 1, New Year’s Day address, he had
announced that North Korea’s nuclear weapons program
was completed with the successful testing of a hydrogen
bomb and an intercontinental ballistic missile, the
Hwasong 15. North Korea was now capable of not only
launching nuclear armed ICBM missiles into U.S.
territories such as Guam and Hawaii, but was also capable
of hitting the U.S. mainland.
On January 17, South Korea announced that a diplomatic
breakthrough had been reached with North Korea. The two
Koreas would march together at the upcoming February 9-
25 Winter Olympics, and field a joint ice hockey team.
This was followed a few weeks after the end of the
Olympics, by Kim Jong-Un’s March 6 offer to put his
nuclear weapons program on hold and start candid talks
with the U.S. Trump immediately accepted Kim’s offer,
which had been mediated behind the scenes by senior
South Korean officials.
Exactly why North Korea decided to reverse its bellicose
policies, improve relations with South Korea, and enter
163
into denuclearization talks after completing its nuclear
weapons program has left many media sources puzzled.
One explanation is that the talks are solely due to warming
ties between North and South Korea. Another is that North
Korea is desperate for cash after years of punishing
economic sanctions that have been very effective.
Some believe that Kim has launched the meeting merely to
gain time and does not intend to follow through on any
agreements reached at the talk. Yet another explanation is
that Trump is setting Kim up for failure in order to justify
military actions against North Korea which will
scapegoated as the villan.
What multiple media sources have not considered is
whistleblower testimonies revealing a deeper dynamic at
play at the U.S. North Korea summit.
On October 7, 2017 Trump issued two tweets where he
gave a stark warning about what his administration was
planning for North Korea:
Trump’s inference was clear, a massive military strike was
being planned to destroy North Korea’s military and
nuclear infrastructure. Such an operation would require
advanced weapons systems that could very quickly destroy
much of North Korea’s military infrastructure in order to
prevent it from retaliating against South Korea, Japan, or
even the U.S. itself.
In a previous article, I pointed out that the kind of weapons
systems required to take out North Korea’s nuclear
infrastructure would have to be orders of magnitude more
powerful than those used in the air wars against Iraq in
2003 and Serbia in 1999.
The U.S. would have to achieve its strategic goals in a
matter of minutes, rather than weeks in order to prevent
retaliatory nuclear strikes that could kill millions. To do so,
Trump was ready to authorize the use of highly classified
space based weapons against North Korea.
I would expect a number of EMP detonations over NK
[North Korea] while at the same time “Rods from God”
[RFG] projectiles would be released from orbit. It should
be noted that North Korea has taken extreme measures to
harden their bunkers and systems against EMP attacks.

At the official level, space based weapons are non-existent
and are merely being planned for the future. However,
whistleblowers/insiders have revealed the existence of
operational space weapons such as “Rods of God”, which
drops large rod-like projectiles from space with pinpoint
accuracy and devastating results.
Each RFG Platform releases 12 projectiles the size of
telephone poles. These projectiles are made of Tungsten
and are coated with ceramic and have a guidance system
similar to the JDAM conventional bombs.

The effects of a “Rods of God” space weapon was

depicted in the movie G.I Joe 2 according to Corey Goode
and Emery Smith in a recent interview with David
Wilcock:

David… What do you feel about the movie

“G.I. Joe”? And did you have any . . .
Emery: I do recall seeing that. I don’t
remember it too well, but I do recall seeing
it and connecting the dots, we’ll say. And I The existence of a U.S. Air Force run secret space program
think there was a lot to it at the time. I with space based weapons technologies is supported by
remember watching it and saying, “Wow! photos taken on October 23, 2017, in the vicinity of
Here they are just coming blatantly out.” ,,, MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida, which showed a
rectangle shaped UFO.
David: They’re doing these beautiful visuals
in the movie with computer animation.
The photographer, JP (who I have known since 2008),
Corey: Oh, yeah, well, especially the claims he had been earlier taken inside the rectangle UFO,
second one when they did the Rods from and had been informed that it was a weapons platform. He
God attacks .. . . on the Earth when that’s says that he witnessed uniformed military personnel
exactly what we’re looking at in the North wearing the insignia of U.S. Air Force Special Operations
Korea thing. who could operate the weapons system.
Emery: Right. Right. Interesting. I didn’t see
the second one.
David: They’re telephone-pole-sized pieces
of tungsten that you can drop onto the
Earth, and just gravity causes a very, very
severe explosion that can devastate a huge
amount of space.
Emery: Oh, yes. Yeah.
David: And he had talked about that. And I
only watched the second “G.I. Joe” film
recently, and I couldn’t believe that it was in
there.
Emery: Wow! Yeah, that’s pretty amazing
for them to blatantly come out and expose Trump’s secret plan to use “Rods of God” and other space
that classified information, but we do start based weapons against North Korea had greatly worried
to see that now all the time with the movies Kim, but it was the Hawaii ballistic missile alert on
are giving tidbits. January 13, which took him down the path of cooperation.
The missile alert coincided with Kim’s decision to begin
In an earlier interview, I asked Goode what his sources had secret talks with South Korea to improve relations through
told him about the space weapons that were planned to be the 2018 Winter Olympics, which was officially
used against North Korea, he replied: announced only four days later, January 17.

164
So what happened during the Hawaii ballistic missile alert
that made Kim seek cooperation with South Korea as a
prelude to offering genuine denuclearization negotiations
with the Trump administration?
On Saturday morning January 13, residents of the
Hawaiian Islands received an emergency alert that warned
of an incoming ballistic missile and instructed everyone to
take cover. This is what appeared on peoples’ cell phones
at 8:07 am local Hawaii time:
Multiple sources claiming that a ballistic nuclear missile
had indeed been intercepted, and a cover up was underway
were analyzed in my first article on the incident. My
.
165
second article pointed to a rogue Deep State/CIA faction
that used a boomer submarine to create a false flag attack,
which was intended start a war with North Korea.
My third article on the incident described a U.S. Air Force
run secret space program that had used its deep space
platforms to shoot down the ballistic missile that had been
launched. In my fourth article, I pointed out how the
whistleblower group QAnon, which is closely tied to the
White House, had confirmed that the Hawaii missile alert
had been a real false flag attack, and that the goal was to
frame North Korea as the culprit.
Essentially, once Kim realized that he had been betrayed
by the Deep State/CIA faction that had secretly helped him
develop a ballistic nuclear weapons program, he decided to
abandon his nuclear weapons program and bellicose
rhetoric against President Trump.
Consequently, the June 12 Summit marks a genuine
turning point in U.S. North Korea relations. There is a real
possibility that agreements will be reached to formally end
the Korean War, start a genuine Korean unification
process, and even lay the foundation for a U.S. military
withdrawal from the Korean peninsula.
The back story as to how a Secret Space program was
instrumental in bringing about the US North Korea
Summit through the threatened, and later actual, use of its
space based weapons platforms, is something that will be
eventually revealed through official disclosure of these
highly classified USAF programs.
 Kim Jong-Un Arrives At Summit Meeting
With President Trump – Carrying Briefcase (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 7:59 Pm

So what’s in the briefcase? President Trump and Kim Jong-Un will

North Korean tyrant Kim Jong Un meet privately for an hour and then later
with advisors.
arrived for his private summit with
President Donald J. Trump in
Singapore.

President Trump arrived after the North

Korean leader.

166
 Reminder: NY Times Nearly Wrecked Summit
With False Report Of ‘Impossible’ To Keep June 12 Date
By Kristinn Taylor
June 11, 2018, 8:08 Pm
As President Donald Trump and North Korea’s communist
dictator Kim Jong Un, meet in Singapore Tuesday
morning, June 12 (local time), it should be remembered
how the New York Times nearly wrecked negotiations on
the summit by deliberately lying that a senior White House
official said it would be “impossible” to keep the June 12
summit in Singapore after Trump called it off in a bid to
get Kim to recognize the seriousness of the moment. The
two nations were in the midst of talks to keep the summit
on schedule when the Times made their report, casting
doubt on the sincerity of the U.S. and prompting Trump to
call out the Times on Twitter.
167
Excerpt from the Times, May 25.
As with so many issues involving this
president, the views of his aides often have
little effect on what he actually says. On
Thursday, for example, a senior White
House official told reporters that even if the
meeting were reinstated, holding it on June
12 would be impossible, given the lack of
time and the amount of planning needed.
On Friday, Mr. Trump said, “It could even
be the 12th.”
Later on Friday, the president reinforced
that possibility, saying on Twitter that if the
meeting were rescheduled, it would “likely
remain” on that day, “and, if necessary, will
be extended beyond that date.”
“We are having very productive talks with
North Korea,” he said.”
CBS News reported on what was actually said by the
official which was not what the Times reported.
While the official didn’t use the word
impossible, the official said, when asked if
a June 12 summit would still be possible,
that there’s “really not a lot of time” to make
that happen, and “June 12th is in 10
minutes.”
“There’s really not a lot of time,” the official
told reporters Thursday afternoon. “We’ve
lost quite a bit of time that we would need
in order to — I mean, there’s been an
enormous amount of preparation that’s
gone on over the past few months at the
White House, at State, and with other
agencies and so forth. But there is a certain
amount of actual dialogue that needs to
take place at the working level with your
counterparts to ensure that the agenda is
clear in the minds of those two leaders
when they sit down to actually meet and
talk and negotiate and hopefully make a
deal. June 12th is in 10 minutes and the
president has said that someday he looks
forward to meeting with him.”
 Trump had even tweeted the evening of the
25th talks were ongoing to keep the June
12 summit date, “We are having very
productive talks with North Korea about
reinstating the Summit which, if it does
happen, will likely remain in Singapore on
the same date, June 12th., and, if
necessary, will be extended beyond that
date.”
Trump did get one thing wrong about the Times’
mendacity. He thought they had made up a source for a
false quote. They actually did worse by making up a false
quote and sourcing it to a real White House official.
Incensed reporters broke the briefing rules to name the
White House official and posted audio of the briefing,
“4. I’ve obtained audio of the WH press
briefing. You can hear Raj Shah, Deputy
Press Secretary, introduce Pottinger (along
with the terms – which are standard) and
then (Matthew) Pottinger makes the
statement that POTUS says was never
made. Lots of reporters in briefing room
and on phone.”

After the false report by the Times, Trump tweeted,

“The Failing @nytimes quotes “a senior

White House official,” who doesn’t exist, as
saying “even if the meeting were
reinstated, holding it on June 12 would be
impossible, given the lack of time and the
amount of planning needed.” WRONG
AGAIN! Use real people, not phony
sources.”

“Unlike what the Failing and Corrupt New

York Times would like people to believe,
there is ZERO disagreement within the
Trump Administration as to how to deal
with North Korea…and if there was, it
wouldn’t matter. The @nytimes has called As can be heard in the audio, the Times report is a lie, as is
me wrong right from the beginning!” Yashar Ali’s characterization.

The “impossible” summit is happening.

168
 House Dems Buck Schumer On
North Korea, Send Trump Letter Of Support
Kristina Wong
11 Jun 2018
A group of progressive House
Democrats, led by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-
CA), is bucking their leadership and
supporting President Trump’s
diplomatic efforts on North Korea.
Khanna and 14 Democratic colleagues on Monday sent a
letter to Trump — ahead of his historic meeting with North
Korean leader Kim Jong-un — saying they were
“encouraged” by his efforts to resolve the Korean War and
achieve denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
“We are encouraged by your efforts to pursue direct
diplomacy with North Korea with the dual goals of
resolving the nearly seven-decade-long conflict and
achieving the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula,”
they wrote.
They also said they were concerned that some, from both
parties and inside and outside of his administration, seek to
“scuttle progress by attempting to place conditions on the
talks, including the insisting on full and immediate
denuclearization or other unrealistic commitments by
North Korea at an early date.”
“Requiring unreasonable concessions before talking, or
early in the negotiations process, is precisely why this
conflict remains unresolved,” they wrote.
169
The House Democrat letter is signed by Reps. Raul
Grijalva (AZ), Barbara Lee (CA), Mark Pocan (WI),
Pramila Jayapal (WA), Tulsi Gabbard (HI), Bobby Rush
(IL), Zoe Lofgren (CA), Madeleine Bordallo (GUAM),
Colleen Hanabusa (HI), Mark DeSaulnier (CA), Richard
Nolan (MN), Karen Bass (CA), Jared Huffman (CA), and
Jamie Raskin (MD).
Their letter stood in stark contrast to one sent on Monday
to the president by Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer (D-NY) and six Senate Democrats, which said
they would oppose any agreement Trump reached with
North Korea unless certain and conditions were met.
Joel Wit, director of 38 North and a fellow at the Stimson
Center, told New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof:
“The Democrats have gone overboard in the conditions
they listed in the letter. … If they’re serious, it’s a
prescription for failure because no one could achieve the
conditions. It’s maybe payback for everything they were
dealt in the Iran deal.”
The House lawmakers said they instead “emphasize the
tremendous value of incremental progress” that advances
the potential for future agreements.
They said some positive steps they would endorse,
combined with commensurate actions by North Korea,
include:
 pledges or agreements to formally end the 68-year war,
 ending the practice of U.S.-ROK “decapitation” military
exercises,
 support for important cooperative efforts such as vital
humanitarian assistance; parliamentarian dialogue and
exchanges; reunions between Koreans and Korean
American families; and the repatriation of US
servicemember remains.
“Such steps, combined with commensurate
actions by North Korea, could help facilitate
the phased denuclearization of the Korean
peninsula,” they wrote.
They also warned that in the event of a collapse in talks,
they would oppose any effort to wage war against North
Korea, except in response to a sudden attack.
 “Accordingly, we stand ready to provide
support for potentially historic progress
made through diplomacy, but will continue
to stand with our ally South Korea in
vehemently opposing any return to threats
.
of illegal and unacceptable military action,”
they wrote.
A recent poll said a vast majority of Americans — 70
percent — support Trump meeting with North Korea.

170
 HISTORY! President Donald Trump
Meets Kim Jong Un At Singapore Summit (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 8:08 Pm

HISTORY! President Donald J. Trump meets with North

Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore.

171
 ‘Hardball’ Panel: ‘Wannabe Despot’ Trump
Likes Kim More Than Allies; Wants
To ‘Fulfill His Fantasy’
By Curtis Houck
June 11, 2018 8:20 PM EDT
Less than two hours before the Trump-Kim summit in
Singapore, MSNBC’s Hardball host Chris Matthews and
panelists Elise Jordan and Bobby Ghosh declared that
President Trump is a “wannabe despot” who wants to
“fulfill his fantasy” by ruling the country with an iron fist
while having more affection for dictators like North
Korea’s Kim Jong-un than U.S. allies.
Matthews first observed to Jordan that Trump
“sits four or five feet from our ally in the
north, that’s, of course, Canada and
Trudeau, who causes us no trouble and
then you see him huddling in these
pictures of huddling with the other guy,
with Putin.” Jordan replied that “[h]e can
relate.”
“Donald Trump can relate to
authoritarians. He, as a former
businessman, he likes absolute control
and we’ve seen,” she added.
Matthews followed up and asked if Trump’s
a “wannabe despot,” and the anti-Trump
Republican agreed and “conceded that
for years now and we're going on
years.”
She elaborated that her belief was due to
“[a]ll of his behavior, his attacks on the
free press, his attacks on alliances that
are designed to strengthen our security,
this is not — he has — he feels more —
he calls Kim Jong-un honorable, yet
Justin Trudeau of Canada” is ridiculed.
172
Ghosh interjected that Trump is indeed “a
wanna-be despot” and while Congress
should stop him from doing so (read:
remove him from office), they haven’t and
instead “are tolerating it, encouraging it,
enabling it.”
“They’re behaving in a way people
behave in a monarchy or a despotism,”
Matthews stated.
The liberal pundit then proceeded by taking note of the
North Korean regime’s brutal human rights record as a
way to (in order to borrow a favorite phrase of the media
to describe Mueller probe criticism) undermine the
summit, which is actually okay.
The problem is that perhaps Matthews’s colleagues at
NBC shouldn’t have been so glowing in their praise for
North Korea during the Pyeongchang Olympic games (see
examples here, here, and here).
To see the relevant transcript from MSNBC’s Hardball on
June 11, click “expand.”
MSNBC’s Hardball
June 11, 2018
7:20 p.m. Eastern
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Elise, again, we're focusing on how Trump
has been able to define the Republican Party, 180 from its roots.
It's now a protectionist party. It's not an alliance building party. It's
not a deficit reduction party. I don’t know where it squares.
ELISE JORDAN: Well, you’re seeing Republicans — they're
going to stay silent certainly through the midterm elections and
Donald Trump has actually gained in approval and is at about 44
percent with his strongest supporters. And so Republicans are
literally petrified —
MATTHEWS: He is at 86 percent.
JORDAN: — and they cower. They are going to cower from
Donald Trump. What we saw on display at the G7 was classic
Donald Trump. He does not like our allies who are about —
MATTHEWS: Using geography to make your point, Elise, he sits
four or five feet from our ally in the north, that’s, of course,
Canada and Trudeau, who causes us no trouble and then you
see him huddling in these pictures of huddling with the other guy,
with Putin. You know, it's really, a statement.
JORDAN: He can relate.
MATTHEWS: He likes Putin.
JORDAN: Donald Trump can relate to authoritarians. He, as a
former businessman, he likes absolute control and we’ve seen
MATTHEWS: Is he a wannabe despot?
JORDAN: I've conceded that for years now and we're going on
years. All of his behavior, his attacks on the free press, his
attacks on alliances that are designed to strengthen our security,
this is not — he has — he feels more — he calls Kim Jong-un
honorable, yet Justin Trudeau of Canada — [GHOSH
MUMBLES]
MATTHEWS: Should go to hell.
BOBBY GHOSH: Is weak. He’s weak. He can be — he can be a
wanna-be despot. He wouldn't be the first person to reach the top
of a democratic country with that ambition. The Senate and
Congress can't allow it, so all those other people that we just
saw, the Paul Ryans and so on, they can't — they can’t sit by
and watch him sort of fulfill his fantasy of wanting to be a despot.
MATTHEWS: They can't?
GHOSH: Well, they oughtn't to be.
173
MATTHEWS: Elise was saying they’re staying silent.
GHOSH: That's the more — that’s the more surprising thing to
me. It's not that Donald Trump wants to behave like a despot. It's
that all of these other people who ought to know better are
tolerating it, encouraging it —
MATTHEWS: They’re behaving in a way —
GHOSH: — enabling it.
MATTHEWS: — people behave in a monarchy or a despotism.
GHOSH: That’s a good way to think of it.
MATTHEWS: You know, North Korea is known to be one of the
most repressive and brutal regimes in history. As NBC News
noted today, the regime” has committed unspeakable atrocities in
a vast scale reminiscent of Nazi journey, according to a 2014
united nations investigation.” However, we’re learning today that
President Trump does not intend to address the issue of human
rights. According to two administration officials, “the U.S. has
decided not to bring up human rights at the summit.” I was told,
Elise, you're not allowed to have a radio there. You're not allowed
to even hear news.
JORDAN: Well, I mean, comparing the regime to atrocities in
Nazi Germany, that is horrific, it's sickening and we're just going
to sit down with him without a mention of that and, you know,
look at all of the criticism of the Iran nuclear deal and the
negotiations surrounding that. And the Republican Parties — the
Republican party was so upset about just keeping the they're —
the narrow confines of the deal to the nuclear agreement. What
about this, though?
 VIDEO=> Dennis Rodman Wears Trump
‘Make America Great Again’ Hat During CNN Singapore
Summit Interview
By Kristinn Taylor
June 11, 2018, 8:52 Pm

Former Chicago Bulls basketball great Dennis Rodman

wore a red Trump ‘Make America Great Again’ hat
during an emotional interview on CNN with Chris Cuomo
Monday night (Tuesday morning) from Singapore as
President Donald Trump met with North Korea communist
dictator Kim Jong Un. At one point Rodman broke into
tears as he spoke about getting death threats and having to
hide as a result of his efforts to bridge the divide between
the U.S. and North Korea.

Screen images via Kristinn Taylor.

It was an emotional interview for Rodman, who has met

with and befriended Kim and faced death threats for his
efforts to bring understanding between the U.S. and North
Korea.

CNN video clip:

174
 UPDATE: Complete interview posted to YouTube by CNN

175
 CBS: Trump Going Into Summit As
More Of A ‘Deal-Breaker’ Than Deal-Maker
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 11, 2018 8:57 PM EDT
Just a few hours before President Trump was scheduled to
sit down with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un for a
historic summit for peace and denuclearization on
Monday, CBS correspondent Bianna Golodryga chided the
President’s ability to negotiate in the United States’s best
interest.
While she began her CBS Evening News report talking
about how Trump and others viewed and talked about his
ability to negotiate in positive terms, Golodryga ultimately
declared
“the self-proclaimed dealmaker-in-chief
has so far proven to be more of a deal-
breaker.”
Anchor Jeff Glor led into Golodryga’s report by joking
that Kim got inside information on Trump’s deal-making
strategy by reading Trump’s book:
President Trump wrote a book on deal-making and we
know Kim Jong-un is aware of it. Dennis Rodman says he
presented the book The Art of the Deal to a government
official in North Korea last year. So Kim may have got a
look inside the Trump playbook in advance.
“The Singapore summit isn't exactly
Thrilla in Manila but it's close, both in
proximity and buildup. So who will walk
away with the better deal,” Golodryga
wondered at the start of her report.
She marveled at how fast Kim was able to get himself a
position of strength, something that alluded his country for
decades.
176
“[T]he 30-something dictator has done
what his father and grandfather before
him couldn't do, rapidly advance his
nuclear program, and now the ultimate
feat, a meeting with the presidents of
the United States,” she touted.
But for Trump’s hand coming into the meeting, Golodryga
sounded skeptical and cited his lack of deals at home as the
reason.
“But the self-proclaimed dealmaker in
chief has so far proven to be more of a
deal breaker, tearing up international
deals and coming up short on domestic
policies. Taxes with Republicans in
charge is his only big win so far,” she
scoffed.
While she was calling him a “deal-breaker,” CBS had the
on-screen graphics flip through deals Trump had pulled the
U.S. out of or failed to get passed (including the Trans-
Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, Iran nuclear
deal, DACA, and health care reform). Of course, there was
no mention of how some of those deals were bad for
America or how the lack of a deal was because of another
party.
In wrapping up her report, Golodryga talked
about how “millions of people will be
watching” the “photo op” summit in which
“billions of lives have a stake in the
outcome.” “This is where the substance
and deals of any deal, arguably Trump's
most important yet, play a crucial role,”
she said.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below:
CBS Evening News
June 11, 2018
6:45:51 PM Eastern [2 minutes 14 seconds]
JEFF GLOR: Back now from Singapore. President Trump wrote
a book on deal-making and we know Kim Jong-un is aware of it.
Dennis Rodman says he presented the book The Art of the Deal
to a government official in North Korea last year. So Kim may
have got a look inside the Trump playbook in advance. Here's
Bianna Golodryga.
[Cuts to video]
BIANNA GOLODRYGA: The Singapore summit isn't exactly
Thrilla in Manila but it's close, both in proximity and buildup. So
who will walk away with the better deal? While little is known of
Kim Jong-un, in just seven years, the 30-something dictator has
done what his father and grandfather before him couldn't do,
rapidly advance his nuclear program, and now the ultimate feat, a
meeting with the presidents of the United States.
(…)
GOLODRYGA: The summit, reportedly a one-on-one meeting, is
exactly where Trump feels most comfortable.
GWENDA BLAIR: He hates multilateral meetings.
.
177
GOLODRYGA: Gwenda Blair, author of The Trumps: Three
Generations of Building and a President says winning was
ingrained into him from an early age. Is it fair to say that Donald
Trump views his life through the lens of a competition?
BLAIR: Totally. Donald Trump is an extremely competitive guy.
GOLODRYGA: He's been doing it since the 1980s. He painted a
self-portrait in the art of deal-making, which led to a turn as a TV
celebrity and ultimately a ticket to the White House.
(…)
GOLODRYGA: But the self-proclaimed dealmaker in chief has so
far proven to be more of a deal breaker, tearing up international
deals and coming up short on domestic policies. Taxes with
Republicans in charge is his only big win so far. Blair says the
President is now looking for a diplomatic knock-out.
BLAIR: I think there's going to be the world cameras are going to
be focused on the handshake, and whether -- who leaves the
imprint other guy's hand.
[Cuts back to live]
GOLODRYGA: While millions of people will be watching for that
photo op, billions of lives have a stake in the outcome. This is
where the substance and deals of any deal, arguably Trump's
most important yet, play a crucial role. Jeff?
GLOR: Bianna, thank you.
 Sean Hannity: Kim Jong Un Can Stay With Me In My
Hotel Room, I’ll Stay On The Couch (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 11, 2018, 9:12 Pm

Sean Hannity broadcast his number one
FOX News cable news show from
Singapore on Monday night.
During his opening monologue Hannity said Kim Jong Un
could share a hotel room with him.
country. Because the North Korean
economy is so distressed. Even Kim Jong
Un reportedly needed financial assistance
to get a hotel room here in Singapore.
I’ll let him stay with me if he wants. I’ll
sleep on the couch.

Via Hannity:

Sean Hannity:

And as Kim Jong Un comes here he can

see just how beautiful Singapore is.
Saying, hmm, maybe we can do this in my
.

178
 Chris Hayes: Trump Not ‘Burdened
By Caring’ About Outcome Of Summit
By Bill D'Agostino
June 11, 2018 9:18 PM EDT

to be the mark and he is the mark,” Hayes

confided. The All In host continued:

He does have a – What he is able to do is not care enough

to get through every successive interaction. And other
people are burdened by caring. Shinzo Abe. Other people
are burdened by a set of conceptions of their fidelity or
duties to the state they represent. He is kind of unburdened
by that.

MSNBC’s live coverage of the Singapore summit between

President Trump and North Korea's Kim Jong Un
amounted to little more than an airing of grievances about
the President. Right out of the gate, commentators
commenced hurling scornful remarks about Trump’s
supposed incompetence and apathy, until All In host Chris
Hayes eventually asserted Donald Trump was not
“burdened by caring” about the outcome of the summit.

Hayes made this remark in the midst of a conversation

about the President’s relationship with various Asian heads
of state. New York Times columnist Nicholas
Kristof offered his theory that South Korean President
Moon Jae-in had manipulated Trump into pursuing the
summit with promises of a shiny reward at the end of it –
in this case, a Nobel Peace Prize.
Unconvinced, MSNBC host Brian Williams countered,
In short, Hayes believed that the President was apathetic
about the ultimate fate of either country involved in the
meeting, and that this gave him the upper hand at the
negotiating table. “I don’t think anyone thinks Donald
Trump cares in some deep way, just as a person, about the
substance of the matter,” he continued. “He cares about the
headlines and everyone knows that who’s on the other side
of the table from him.

“That assumes our President is Hayes’s fellow panelists agreed, and Kristof rejoined to
manipulatable [sic] somehow.” continue his dry diatribe.
“I sometimes can’t tell if his super power is
that everyone thinks that they’re not going
.

179
 White House Photos And Videos Of Trump-Kim
#Singaporesummit
By Kristinn Taylor
June 12, 2018, 12:09 Am

The White House, Trump administration officials and the

State Department are posting photos and videos of the
historic summit between President Donald Trump and the
North Korea’s communist dictator Kim Jong Un.

President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim

Jong Un, walk together to their expanded bilateral
meeting, Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in
Singapore. (Official White House Photo by Shealah
Craighead)
President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim
Jong Un, participate in their bilateral meeting, Tuesday,
June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in Singapore. (Official
White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim

Jong Un, shake hands as they meet for the first time,
Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in Singapore.
(Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim
Jong Un, walk together to their expanded bilateral
meeting, Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in
Singapore. (Official White House Photo by Shealah
Craighead)

180
President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim
Jong Un, shake hands as they meet for the first time,
Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in Singapore.
(Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
Assistant to the President Dan Scavino,Jr.:
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders:

181
 Vidoes by the State Department:

182
 UPDATE: Fox Business video of Trump speaking to press,
alongside Kim, announcing imminent signing by the
leaders.

183
 Boot Discards Trump-Kim Summit As
Something ‘Any Previous President Could Have’ Done
By Curtis Houck
June 12, 2018 12:10 AM EDT
CNN global affairs analyst and anti-Trump Republican
Max Boot has had a rough day with this Trump-Kim
summit. So, it was natural for him to repeatedly dismiss
the Singapore gathering on Monday’s CNN Tonight as
something that “any previous president could have
done” and it was only Donald Trump who foolishly
decided to make North Korea’s dreams come true and
legitimize them on the world stage.
Connecting the Singapore summit to
Trump’s previous stop at the G7, Boot
surmised that Trump’s “war of words” with
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
was “a calamitous development” that
could destroy “the underpinning of
American peace and prosperity since
1945.” Yeesh.
Boot was first asked to comment on the latest installment
of the CNN feedback loop (Dennis Rodman crying to
Chris Cuomo in the past hour) and replied that it
“add[ed] to the spectacle of the day and
from the standpoint of spectacle, you'd
have to say what happened is a success
and I think that's primarily what both
Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump are
interested it.”
On cue, Boot deemed North Korea the winner of the
summit before it had even ended:
For Kim Jong-un this is already a victory because he wants
legitimacy, he wants a place on the international, he wants
to be recognized as an equal by the president of the United
States, he wants to seen as nuclear power, and he's
184
achieving all of that. This is a tremendous propaganda
victory for him.
He then took issue with comments raised by conservative
political commentator Scott Jennings that this was a
victory for Trump and United States.
Why? Because “any previous president
could have easily had a summit with any
previously leader of North Korea
because they've been very eager to be
legitimated by the President of the
United States, and Donald Trump is the
first one to agree to do that.”
Jennings responded that if any of Trump’s predecessors
could have gotten Kim to the negotiating table, they would
have done it (click “expand” for more):
Where I think Trump has, gotten it right and I don't think
Hillary Clinton would have pulled it off if she had won. I
don't think Obama tried hard to pull it off. The Bush 43
White House didn’t pull it off. The Clinton White House
didn’t pull it off. Where they all came up short was they
never drove the sanctions deep enough to drive Kim to the
table and never made Kim believe that the military option
was truly on the table. I think Trump did that on both
fronts and that’s why Kim is here. So, you can say that it’s
legitimacy in the short-term, but I’m willing to give that up
if it means long-term denuclearization. I want the President
to stick to that, though. I don’t want to let him off the
hook.
As for the G7, Boot lashed out at Trump’s
behavior as a “fiasco” that he’s never
seen before “and the contrast is all the
greater when we see the way Donald
Trump is glad-handing Kim Jong-un,
who is the enslaver of his people.”
Boot continued on with his apocalyptic tone by suggesting
that Trump was more comfortable with a murderous
dictator than his fellow Western leaders (click “expand”):
Somebody who keeps more 100,000 people in slave labor
camps and he's talking about how honored he is to meet
him and how — what a great relationship they have and
how they're going to get along great. And, on the other
hand, his aides are saying that Justin Trudeau, the Prime
Minister of our closest ally and neighbor, Canada, he's
going to rot in hell. I mean, that is a striking contrast and a
difference between the way that Donald Trump approaches
dictators and Democrats.
Expanding on that, Boot ruled that Trump’s
feuding was “not something that should
be happening” and “very destructive for
the American position in the world” that
could have a bigger global impact “than
whatever happens here with Kim Jong-
un.”
“[B]ut the fact that Donald Trump is
undermining the unity of the western
alliance, which has been the
underpinning of American peace and
prosperity since 1945. I think is a
calamitous development,” he concluded.
To see the relevant transcript from June 11's CNN Tonight:
CNN Tonight
June 11, 2018
10:19 p.m. Eastern
SCOTT JENNINGS: Well, it looks great for Donald Trump so far
because he’s done what he promised the American people he
would do and that’s drive the North Koreans to the table for the
purpose of them giving up their nuclear weapons Now, we’ll have
to see if North Korea is willing to follow through on what they say
they want and I think the President must be prepared for these
people to lie to us because they've about lying to the world for a
long time, but right now, from a policy perspective, from a political
perceptive, Donald Trump looks like he's in command of this
situation and I suspect that the American people are rooting for
him to succeed. Nobody wants to be in a nuclear war with
anybody and this is the most clear and present danger to that, so
good for the President tries to make peace with a guy that no one
previously has been able to solve.
(....)
MAX BOOT: Well, I just think the Rodman comments kind of add
to the spectacle of the day and from the standpoint of spectacle,
185
you'd have to say what happened is a success and I think that's
primarily what both Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump are
interested it. As we know, President Trump is all about the
ratings. He views success as being the center of attention and
now he has the entire attention of the world on him and, you
know, I'm sure people are watching and they’re riveted by what's
going on. They’re riveted by Dennis Rodman's comments. For
Kim Jong-un this is already a victory because he wants
legitimacy, he wants a place on the international, he wants to be
recognized as an equal by the president of the United States, he
wants to seen as nuclear power, and he's achieving all of that.
This is a tremendous propaganda victory for him. Now, Scott just
suggested it was a huge victory for Donald Trump simply to come
to the summit. Well, I know, I beg to differ because, in fact, any
previous president could have easily had a summit with any
previously leader of North Korea because they've been very
eager to be legitimated by the President of the United States, and
Donald Trump is the first one to agree to do that. Now, the
question is, is he actually going to receive something in
substantial in return? At the end of April, Donald Trump said he's
going to judge the success of the summit on whether they'd give
up their nuclear weapons or not and there’s, so far, zero
indication that the North Koreans are actually going to give up
their nuclear weapons, but I suppose we can always be
pleasantly surprised.
DON LEMON: So, let’s talk about — Scott — let's talk about what
max just said. Do you think this gives Kim legitimacy? That’s the
first part then I have another question for you.
JENNINGS: Well, sure. I think that, in the short term, they're both
operating from an area of legitimacy and that's okay for now. The
North Koreans do have to, ultimately, give up their nuclear
weapons and they have to be better world actors and the
President has to be prepared for them to lie about this and
disappoint us in the long-term. I absolutely agree at that — with
that. Where I think Trump has, gotten it right and I don't think
Hillary Clinton would have pulled it off if she had won. I don't
think Obama tried hard to pull it off. The Bush 43 White House
didn’t pull it off. The Clinton White House didn’t pull it off. Where
they all came up short was they never drove the sanctions deep
enough to drive Kim to the table and never made Kim believe
that the military option was truly on the table. I think Trump did
that on both fronts and that’s why Kim is here. So, you can say
that it’s legitimacy in the short-term, but I’m willing to give that up
if it means long-term denuclearization. I want the President to
stick to that, though. I don’t want to let him off the hook.
(....)
JENNINGS: Well, I tell you what he gets and what America gets,
today, is we get to stop banging our head against the wall. We’ve
been banging our head against the wall on this problem for
decades and, today, it feels like at least there's a light open here,
a door open, a window is open for us to go through it and see
what's on the other side. What are the possibilities? When Trump
ran for president, like it or not like it, he said I'm going to do
foreign policy different than the way the political establishment
has done. He’s clearly doing that today and if he manages,
somehow, to pull it off, he will have pulled off what the political
establishment could not for all those decades. So what does he
get, Don? I think he gets America for the short time we're not
banging our head against the wall.
LEMON: Go ahead, Max.
BOOT: That's a huge what if that — that Scott is throwing out
there and let's remember how he and other Republicans would
be acting if this was Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama who would
agree to a sit down with Kim Jong-un without having gotten any
significant concessions in return. They would be apoplectic. Now,
I mean, I’m all in favor of diplomacy and I certainly hope this
works out, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves and claim that
simply meeting with Kim, which again, is something that any
previous president could have done. Meeting with him is not an
achievement. The achievement comes if he agree to complete
verifiable, irreversible, denuclearization and, so far, there's very
little indication that he's going to do that and I do have to give — I
mean, I do have to give President Trump credit for his maximum
pressure policy on North Korea. I mean, I agree with Scott there.
I think increasing the sanctions was a good move and it may well
have brought Kim Jong-un to the table.
(....)
186
BOOT: Well, I mean, this was just the fiasco at the G7. I’ve never
seen anything like this and the contrast is all the greater when we
see the way Donald Trump is glad-handing Kim Jong-un, who is
the enslaver of his people. Somebody who keeps more 100,000
people in slave labor camps and he's talking about how honored
he is to meet him and how — what a great relationship they have
and how they're going to get along great. And, on the other hand,
his aides are saying that Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of
our closest ally and neighbor, Canada, he's going to rot in hell. I
mean, that is a striking contrast and a difference between the
way that Donald Trump approaches dictators and Democrats.
And, you know, we're not going to be successful in dealing with
our problems whether it's North Korea, China, Russia, Syria or so
many others unless we have unity in our western alliance, but
Donald Trump is destroying that unity. He is waging trade war
with our allies. He is in a war of words with the Prime Minister of
Canada. I mean, let's remember how amazing this is. Canada,
one of our closest allies, a country that has fought with us for 100
years and Donald Trump is angrily castigating its prime minister?
This is not something that should be happening. This is just very
destructive for the American position in the world and whatever,
in fact, this may ultimately turn out to be more significant than
whatever happens here with Kim Jong-un, we'll see what
happens, but the fact that Donald Trump is undermining the unity
of the western alliance, which has been the underpinning of
American peace and prosperity since 1945. I think is a
calamitous development.
 CNN Host Fears Trump Is Too
Jetlagged To Know What He’s Doing
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 12, 2018 12:23 AM EDT
So we’re finally here. The Tuesday (Singapore time)
summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and North
Korean dictator Kim Jong-un was something the liberal
media were doubtful would ever happen, but here we are.
When the two leaders were just a couple of hours from
meeting each other, the liberal media were grasping at
straws to find some way to attack and discredit the summit.
On Monday’s (U.S. time) edition of CNN’s OutFront, host
Erin Burnett was so desperate to find something to
complain and fear monger about she actually suggested
Trump was too jetlagged to be effective. It was something
her panel pounced on to sew concern about the President’s
ability to strike a deal.
When Burnett started her program, her greatest concern
was that Trump and Kim would first meet one-on-one with
no one else there but their translators.
“And we do understand it will be one-on-
one. Just the two men and their
translators. Now, President Trump
seems to have slept little if at all, that's
the issue with Asian jet-lag,” she fretted
as she noted he was up early tweeting
criticism of his “hatters.”
It was a historic moment for the world where anything
could happen (including the possibility of an outline for
further peace talks), but Burnett huffed about how all she
saw was two men running a “reality show”:
He's making it clear he believes this is all about him, his
personal power and ability, mano-a-mano with Kim, and
that's what it is about. Two larger than life showmen have
turned a summit about life and death into a sort of reality
187
show in Singapore. You know, listen to the cheers for Kim
when he went out on the town in Singapore.
Seizing on his host’s doubts about Trump’s mental state
ahead of the meeting, former CIA operative Robert Baer
also harped on Trump being too tired and too dumb to
know what’s going on.
“That's a bad idea. You've already
mentioned the jet-lag, the issues are too
complicated for him. He's said in so
many words he's not really up on the
issues,” he chided.
“But at the end of the day, I don't see
what you could get out of a one-on-one
meeting like that and will he even
remember what was said at that point?
And will he cover the main points? I tell
you, I couldn't,” he continued.
So, Baer argued that Trump was too dumb to remember
what happened in the meeting because he was too?
Sticking up for Obama’s decrepit legacy of nuclear
agreements,
Burnett declared that Trump had a major
“problem” in that “the Iran deal is the
standard” and suggested Trump couldn’t
possibly get that much in an agreement.
“He's gotta have more verification than
was in there. He’s got to have -- and
that's pretty hard to do,” she claimed.
“You're absolutely right. In a logical
world, that's a problem. But not in this
 world,” opined a bitter Joel Wit, a Clinton-
era official who negotiated with North
Korea for that administration. “And so, I
think what Trump will do is take
ownership of this problem and he'll say,
‘this is enough.’ And then the Iran deal,
well, he didn't make that deal. So it was
a bad deal. He makes this deal, it's a
good deal.”
Judging by this frantic attempt at trying to cast the summit
in a negative light from every angle, it’s almost like they
didn’t want the summit to be successful.
This is CNN.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below:
CNN's Erin Burnett OutFront
June 11, 2018
7:01:12 PM Eastern
(…)
ERIN BURNETT: He and President Trump are expected to leave
their respective hotels for the summit within moments. 12 hours'
difference. So it's Tuesday morning in Singapore, and they are
heading to Sentosa Island just off the coast there. These are live
pictures of the island, that's where the summit is going to be held.
Once there, they'll head to the Capella hotel. They'll then walk
outside there to have an official greeting for the cameras, a
historic handshake.
And that will be the beginning of the first one-on-one meeting
between a sitting U.S. President and the leader of North Korea.
And we do understand it will be one-on-one. Just the two men
and their translators.
Now, President Trump seems to have slept little if at all, that's the
issue with Asian jet-lag. But he started tweeting just after 5:00 am
local time this morning. His most recent tweets slamming critics
of the meeting, calling them, quote, “haters and losers.” And then
this one, maybe the tweet that ultimately matters the most, the
President saying, quote, “meetings between staffs and
representatives are going well and quickly, but in the end, that
doesn't matter. We'll all know soon whether or not a real deal,
unlike those of the past, can happen.”
He's making it clear he believes this is all about him, his personal
power and ability, mano-a-mano with Kim, and that's what it is
about. Two larger than life showmen have turned a summit about
life and death into a sort of reality show in Singapore. You know,
listen to the cheers for Kim when he went out on the town in
Singapore.
(…)
.
188
BURNETT: Bob, a senior Trump administration official is telling
us they're going to go in front of the cameras for this first very
formal handshake, and then there's this one-on-one, and we
really do understand it to be one-on-one, Trump, Kim, translators,
that's it. No aides, no other secondary tertiary sources on what
actually happens in the room. Your take?
ROBERT BAER: That's a bad idea. You've already mentioned
the jet-lag, the issues are too complicated for him. He's said in so
many words he's not really up on the issues. In the sense, it
starts a process and it's better than threatening each other. So
that's the good part of it. But at the end of the day, I don't see
what you could get out of a one-on-one meeting like that and will
he even remember what was said at that point? And will he cover
the main points? I tell you, I couldn't.
(…)
BURNETT: And yet, Jean, when you see what's happened here,
the North Korean envoy coming to Washington, D.C., an
unprecedented move, something the Iranians were never granted
when they were working on the deal with President Obama. You
have this meeting itself, the cheers, the selfie. Kim Jong-un is
sort of a -- I don't know what the right word is, but certainly
approachable figure. You say he's already won hugely.
JEAN LEE: He has. We've given him this platform to make his
international debut. He's done very little in return. He will come
into this saying, “look, I blew up our nuclear test site,” and Joel
can talk a bit more about that. He'll say, “I released the American
hostages.” We may see another symbolic gesture, perhaps the
return of the USS Pueblo, which is a warship that was captured
50 years ago this year. But we haven't had anything concrete.
We've given him this platform to show himself as a world leader
and a nuclear power. It's a bit unsettling for me to be honest
because he's not changed. He's still the same person and we are
just giving him this platform.
(…)
BURNETT: Doesn't Trump have a problem, though? Because, I
mean, the Iran deal is the standard right? He's gotta have more
verification than was in there. He’s got to have -- and that's pretty
hard to do.
JOEL WIT: You're absolutely right. In a logical world, that's a
problem. But not in this world. And so, I think what Trump will do
is take ownership of this problem and he'll say, “this is enough.”
And then the Iran deal, well, he didn't make that deal. So it was a
bad deal. He makes this deal, it's a good deal.
BURNETT: So it's about personality.
(…)
 Enough! CNN’s Jim Acosta Screams Out Most
Inappropriate Question At Most Inappropriate Time At
Trump-Kim Summit… Disgusting!
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 1:36 Am

No more excuses. Jim Acosta must go!

President Trump did more for the Warmbier family than

At the most historic point during this
anyone else could have done. As soon as he took over
most historic day, Jim Acosta from CNN
office, he negotiated for Warmbier’s return to the US.
showed his true colors with the most
Warmbier was imprisoned in North Korea in 2016 for
disgusting question at the most
attempted theft. He was tortured for a year while former
inappropriate time. He should never be
President Obama did nothing. President Trump negotiated
allowed into a presidential or White
his return to his family in the US who watched him die
House presser ever again.
hours later from the torture he received in North Korea.
President Trump today was enjoying one of the most
President Trump did all he could for that family, but today
significant and historical moments of his Presidency. He
the President was signing an agreement for the future of
had somehow brought the leader of North Korea to the
the world. Although we do not know at this time what is in
table to sign the most important agreement in the last 70
the agreement, we do know that the President’s efforts will
years for the Korean people. The President brought Kim
lead towards peace in the Korean Peninsula. This moment
Jong Un to Singapore to negotiate a deal between the US
was historical and then Jim Acosta attempted to destroy it.
and North Korea.

Jim Acosta should never be allowed in

Only a year ago Korea was sending
the White House press pool ever again.
rockets over Japan and today their
He should apologize to the President
leader was signing an agreement with
and all of America and the Warmbier
US President Trump.
family. Shame, shame, shame on you,
Jim Acosta.
Months of hard work and diplomacy reached a climax on
Tuesday. The moment will go down in history. Then Fake
News CNN’s Jim Acosta, the darling of the disgusting left,
blurted out loudly for all to hear:

“Did you talk about Otto Warmbier sir?”

Earlier in the day, Acosta’s actions were questioned for

attempting to sabotage the event by calling Kim Jong Un a
lunatic:

189
 Details Of Trump-Kim
#Singaporesummit Document
By Kristinn Taylor
June 12, 2018, 1:59 Am

A photograph of President Donald Trump holding a copy

of the document he co-signed with North Korea’s
communist dictator Kim John Un shows four points were
agreed to by the two leaders.

UPDATE: The White House released the text just before 5

a.m. EDT. It is appended at the end of this article.

ABC News’s Conor Finnegan posted a photo and reported

the four points.

Screen images by Kristinn Taylor. “4 STATEMENTS BOTH COMMITTED TO: “1. The
United States and the DPRK commit to establish new US-
DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the
peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.”

190
“2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts
to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean
Peninsula.”

“3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom

Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.”

“4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering

POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation
of those already identified.”

“The United States and the DPRK commit to hold follow-

on negotiations, led by the US Secretary of State, Mike
Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK official, at the
earliest possible date, to implement the outcomes of the
US-DPRK summit.”

“Trump & “Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs

Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea have committed to cooperate for the development of
new US-DPRK relations and for the promotion of peace,
prosperity, and security of the Korean Peninsula and of the
world.”

Video of signing:

191
 denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, President Trump
and Chairman Kim Jong Un state the following:
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press
Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 12, 2018
**
*Joint Statement of President Donald J.
Trump of the United States of America
and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea*
*at the Singapore Summit*
_ America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State
President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America
and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs
Commission of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
(DPRK) held a first, historic summit in Singapore on June
12, 2018.
President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un conducted a
comprehensive, in-depth, and sincere exchange of opinions
on the issues related to the establishment of new
U.S.DPRK relations and the building of a lasting and
robust peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. President
Trump committed to provide security guarantees to the
DPRK, and Chairman Kim Jong Un reaffirmed his firm
and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization
of the Korean Peninsula.
Convinced that the establishment of new U.S. DPRK
relations will contribute to the peace and prosperity of the
Korean Peninsula and of the world, and recognizing that
mutual confidence building can promote the
.
192
1. The United States and the DPRK commit
to establish new U.S.DPRK relations in
accordance with the desire of the peoples
of the two countries for peace and
prosperity.
*2.The United States and the DPRK will
join their efforts to build a lasting and stable
peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018
Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK
commits to work toward complete
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
4. The United States and the DPRK commit
to recovering POW/MIA remains, including
the immediate repatriation of those already
identified.
Having acknowledged that the U.S.DPRK summitthe
first in historywas an epochal event of great
significance in overcoming decades of tensions and
hostilities between the two countries and for the
opening up of a new future, President Trump and
Chairman Kim Jong Un commit toimplement the
stipulations in this joint statement fully and
expeditiously. The United States andthe DPRK
commit to hold follow-on negotiations, led by the U.S.
Secretary of State, MikePompeo, and a relevant high-
level DPRK official, at the earliest possible date, to
implement the outcomes of the U.S.DPRK summit.
President Donald J. Trump of the United States of
Affairs Commission of the Democratic Peoples
Republic of Korea have committed to cooperate for
the development of new U.S.DPRK relations and for
the promotion of peace, prosperity, and security of the
Korean Peninsula and of the world.
DONALD J. TRUMP
President of the United States of America
KIM JONG UN
Chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
June 12, 2018
Sentosa Island
Singapore
 PRESIDENT TRUMP Shows Kim Jong Un
An Inside View Of “The Beast” After Historic Summit
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 7:07 Am

Here’s the video.

Trump shows Kim his ride.

President Donald Trump gave North

Korean dictator an inside look of “The
Beast” presidential limo after their
historic talks in Singapore.

FOX News reported:

President Trump gave North Korean

dictator Kim Jong Un a rare look into his
presidential limo – dubbed “The Beast” –
on Tuesday after the two ate lunch during
their historic summit in Singapore.
The media spotted Trump and Kim
approaching the limousine, adorned with
an American flag. Trump gestured to the
car and then a Secret Service agent
opened the right passenger door.
Kim could be seen smiling as he looked
inside the vehicle.

193
 Seriously? Anti-Trumper Ben Shapiro On
Trump-Kim Summit: “The Paper That Was Signed
Yesterday Is Weak” (Video)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 7:50 Am

Why is it that the #NeverTrump crowd can never celebrate

President Trump’s historic achievements?

Trump has had the most successful first 500 days in

presidential history.

And on the world stage President Trump is putting

American interests first — something we have not seen in
decades.

So what is the difference between Ben

Shapiro and what you would hear on
MSNBC or CNN this morning?
How awful.
Via FOX and Friends:

President Donald J. Trump and North Korean leader Kim

Jong Un, shake hands as they meet for the first time,
Tuesday, June 12, 2018, at the Capella Hotel in Singapore.
(Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

After President Trump’s historic summit meeting wtih Ben Shapiro also hit President Trump on Twitter.
Kim Jong Un Ben Shapiro went on FOX and Friends and
threw water on the fire.

Ben told the morning crew,

“The president’s praise for the dictator

of North Korea was disquieting… The
paper that was signed yesterday was
weak.”

Ben, who is a favorite of the DC establishment, then went

on slam the Trump administration for putting US flags
next to the North Korean flags.

194
 On point.

195
 Robert Mueller Spent $4.5 Million On
Russiagate Without A Congressional Appropriation
Whether For A New Park In A Powerful Congressman’s Home District Or For A
Special Counsel, The Country’s Checks Mustn’t Clear Unless Congress Actually Says
They Should.
By Sean Ross Callaghan
June 12, 2018
Perhaps it’s a sign of the times, but many citizens don’t
pay much attention to how the government keeps
taxpayers’ checks from bouncing. The Constitution does,
however. Congress—and only Congress—holds the power
of the purse.
We might wonder, then, how Special Counsel Robert
Mueller spends money. Congress has not specifically
appropriated money to fund Mueller’s investigations and
prosecutions. How, then, do Mueller’s checks clear?
Recently, Mueller provided a little-noticed answer that
raises serious legal and constitutional concerns.
Robert Mueller’s Spending Report
Late last month, Mueller released a spending report. The
report lays out the legal authority that Mueller claims to
spend money. Mueller claims his spending is principally
authorized by “the permanent, indefinite appropriation for
independent counsels.” Muller claims “the [Department of
Justice (DOJ)] has determined [that this appropriation] is
legally available to fund” his investigation. Mueller cites a
2004 Government Accountability Office (GAO) opinion
that “this appropriation was legally available to fund
special counsels.”
The permanent and indefinite appropriation is important to
Mueller’s investigations and prosecutions. According to
Mueller’s report, from October 1, 2017, through March 31,
196
2018, this appropriation accounted for $4,506,624 of
Mueller’s spending. That’s about half of all Mueller’s
spending during that time and all the spending during that
time on salaries and benefits. (The remainder of Mueller’s
spending is unreimbursed expenses incurred by other DOJ
components—essentially money siphoned from other
investigations.)
Mueller claims the authority for his spending is codified in
statutory notes to Section 591 of Title 28 of the United
States Code. These notes do state that Congress established
“a permanent indefinite appropriation … within the
Department of Justice to pay all necessary expenses of
investigations and prosecutions by independent counsel
appointed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 591 et
seq. or other law.” The notes state that Congress did so in
Title II of Public Law 100–202, December 22, 1987. Sure
enough, Congress did.
But does the permanent and indefinite appropriation for
independent counsels apply to special counsels?
What GAO Actually Thinks About This
Mueller cites the GAO opinion as “agreeing with the DOJ
that this appropriation was legally available to fund special
counsels.” The opinion concerns the appointment in
December 2003 of Patrick Fitzgerald, then a Senate-
confirmed U.S. attorney, as special counsel, by then-
Deputy Attorney General James Comey. (Fitzgerald, you
may recall, investigated who revealed the identity of
undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame.)
As noted above, the permanent and indefinite
appropriation is available to fund investigations and
prosecutions by “independent counsel appointed pursuant
to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 591 et seq. or other law.”
The GAO focused on the “other law” prong of the
appropriation because Section 591 et seq. of Title 28 of the
U.S. Code—the independent-counsel law—lapsed in 1999.
 “The term ‘independent counsel’ is not
defined in the permanent indefinite
appropriation,” the GAO noted in beginning
its analysis. So, the GAO considered
whether Fitzgerald was an “independent
counsel appointed pursuant to … other
law.” To decide, the GAO “looked for
indicia of [the Special Counsel’s]
independence.” In this regard, the GAO
looked for Fitzgerald’s de jure
independence—viz., independence
expressly granted by law.
Under the GAO’s reasoning, an
“independent counsel appointed pursuant
to … other law” who is entitled to the
permanent and indefinite appropriation
enjoys the de jure independence that
independent counsels appointed under the
lapsed independent-counsel law generally
did. Under a provision of the lapsed
independent-counsel law, independent
counsels enjoyed the “independent
authority to exercise all investigative and
prosecutorial functions and powers of …
the Attorney General.”
That makes sense. The permanent and indefinite
appropriation was originally for independent counsels. As
the GAO explained in its opinion, when Congress
considered the permanent and indefinite appropriation, in
1987, because of “legal challenges … underway regarding
the constitutionality of the procedure followed to appoint
independent counsels”—presumably the famed case
Morrison v. Olson the Supreme Court decided the
following year—
“the independent counsels appointed under
‘other law’ around [that] time…. were the
independent counsels that also had been
appointed in conformity with the
requirements of the independent counsel
law.”
Put differently, the same independent counsels were being
appointed under dual authority to ensure that their
investigations would continue should Morrison v. Olson
strike down the appointment procedure in the independent-
counsel law.
In looking for “indicia of independence” for Fitzgerald, the
GAO concluded that
“[t]he [DOJ], in appointing Special Counsel
Fitzgerald, has afforded him independence
by delegating all of the Attorney General’s
authority with respect to [an] investigation
197
and instructing him to exercise that
authority independent of the control of any
officer of the Department.”
The GAO further concluded that to the extent they limited
Fitzgerald’s independence, regulations in Part 600 of Title
28 of the Code of Federal Regulations were waived. The
GAO noted,
“In February 2004, Acting Attorney General
Comey clarified Special Counsel
Fitzgerald’s delegation of authority to state
that the authority previously delegated to
him is plenary…. [and that] the title of
‘Special Counsel’ in this matter should not
be misunderstood to suggest that [his]
position and authorities [were] defined and
limited by 28 CFR Part 600.”
Not so with Mueller.
Let’s Apply that GAO Opinion to Mueller
Mueller’s independence, as a de jure
matter, is clearly “defined and limited” by
Part 600 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This means Mueller lacks the
“indicia of independence” the GAO required
in 2004 to fit Fitzgerald into Congress’
permanent and indefinite appropriation.
The public order appointing Mueller—who, unlike
Fitzgerald at the time of his appointment, is not currently a
Senate-confirmed officer—states that
“Sections 600.4 through 600.10 of Title 28
of the Code of Federal Regulations are
applicable to the Special Counsel.”
These sections limit Mueller’s de jure independence,
subjecting him to the supervision of Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein, the acting attorney general in
charge of Mueller’s investigation to the extent that
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is recused.
In particular, Section 600.7(b) states that
Rosenstein “may request that the Special
Counsel provide an explanation for any
investigative or prosecutorial step, and may
after review conclude that the action is so
inappropriate or unwarranted under
established Departmental practices that it
should not be pursued.” In de jure
independence, Mueller is no Fitzgerald,
and certainly no independent counsel.
At bottom, Mueller is relying on a broad interpretation of a
three-decade old appropriation for an “independent
counsel” that, with the lapse of the independent-counsel
law, does not really exist anymore.
Here’s the DOJ’s Choice
To strengthen Mueller’s claim to the permanent and
indefinite appropriation, the DOJ could grant Mueller
greater de jure independence. But not so fast.
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires that
principal officers of the executive branch be appointed by
the president and confirmed by the Senate. Mueller wasn’t.
Yet to be exempt from that constitutionally mandated
appointments procedure, the Supreme Court holds that an
appointed officer must have a boss—that is, the officer
must be “directed and supervised at some level by others
who were appointed by presidential nomination with the
advice and consent of the Senate” (Edmond v. United
States, 520 U.S. 651, 663 (1997)).
If the DOJ grants Mueller de jure independence from any
such boss, then Mueller is a principal officer and his
appointment therefore violates the Appointments Clause of
the Constitution.
Alternatively, the DOJ could seek another congressional
appropriation to replace Mueller’s spending from the
permanent and indefinite appropriation. But Congress is
.
198
unlikely to agree to such new appropriation with a veto-
proof margin.
Conceivably, perhaps, the DOJ could replace Mueller with
a Senate-confirmed officer and grant his replacement
greater de jure independence. It is unclear, however,
whether the DOJ would take such a step now. As to his
authority to be appointed and to spend money, Mueller is
under a political-legal whipsaw.
Congress Has a Choice to Make
Congress has a constitutionally mandated role in
appropriating money. Under the constitutional
nondelegation doctrine, Congress cannot wholly delegate
its legislative functions to an executive-branch agency. If
“independent counsel appointed pursuant to … other law”
were interpreted as whomever an executive branch officer
whenever designates for whatever purpose, surely
nondelegation concerns would arise.
This is ironic, as one would think that the last thing
Congress would seek to delegate is its power to spend. But
whether for a new park in a powerful congressman’s home
district or for a special counsel, the country’s checks
mustn’t clear unless Congress actually says they should.
Checks and balances, and all that.
 Dirty Cop Rosenstein Won’t Allow Grassley
To Interview Agent Pientka Who Knows DOJ Likely
Altered Mike Flynn’s Testimony
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 8:18 Am
As TGP previously reported in February,
according to Mike Cernovich, McCabe
altered far left FBI investigator Peter
Strzok’s 302 notes on his interview with
General Michael Flynn.
And then McCabe destroyed the
evidence.
Now Senate investigators suspect
McCabe altered his 302 notes on
General Flynn and have referred the
matter to Inspector General Horowitz.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley is the one who
pressured the FBI and DOJ to turn over the 302 notes on
General Flynn’s investigation.
In Friday May 11, 2018, Senate Judiciary
Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent
199
a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray
and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein stating
Comey testified the FBI didn’t think General
Flynn lied. Grassley also revealed Joe
Pientka was the second FBI agent who
joined Peter Strzok on January 24th,
2017 in an ambush style interview to
take down General Flynn.
Rosenstein refused to give the Senate
Judiciary Committee the requested
documents. Instead, Rosenstein
provided “insufficient” documents
prompting Grassley to send a second
scathing letter to the Deputy AG.
It appears Senate investigators have finally received the
302 notes or evidence confirming Cernovich’s February
scoop that the FBI summary on Flynn’s interview was
altered by McCabe.
Now this…
Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein doesn’t want Special Agent
Pientka to testify.
Investigative reporter, Sara Carter says
Pientka, if issued a subpoena, will discuss
how forthcoming Flynn was about very
specific sensitive information that Flynn
could not have possibly known the
investigators already knew, which may give
 additional insight into Flynn’s veracity and
willingness to tell the truth.
Pientka is ready to discuss a very
specific piece of sensitive information
Flynn provided during the interrogation
that will further prove Flynn is being
truthful.
Grassley is now going after Rosenstein
for access to Pientka.
FOX News reported:
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman
Chuck Grassley isn’t backing down as the
.
200
Justice Department rebuffs his repeated
attempts to speak with the FBI agent
whose interview with Michael Flynn was
used to indict the ex-national security
adviser in the Russia probe.
“This is no ordinary criminal case,”
Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a June 6 letter
to Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein. “Congress has a right to know
the full story and to know it now.”
Grassley is pressing his request anew after the DOJ once
again rejected his bid to speak with FBI Agent Joe Pientka
and to obtain the FBI’s records of the interview.
 Here’s What Trump,
Kim Jong Un Agreed Upon At Summit
Saagar Enjeti | White House Correspondent
8:36 AM 06/12/2018

taking concrete steps towards denuclearization. Most

consequentially North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed
a pledge to

“work toward complete denuclearization of

the Korean Peninsula.”

President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim

Jong Un took steps toward decreasing tensions on the
Korean peninsula, in a joint statement signed by the two
leaders Tuesday.

The text of the agreement was seen by reporters before its

official release by the White House after Trump held it up
during a joint signing ceremony with Kim Jong Un. The
text of the agreement notes first that
Trump and Kim also committed to holding future meetings
“the United States and the DPRK commit to
between their two countries “led by the US Secretary of
establish new US-DPRK relations in
State, Mike Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK
accordance with the desire of the peoples
official, at the earliest possible date, to implement the
of the two countries for peace and
outcomes of the US-DPRK summit.”
prosperity.”
“Chairman Kim and I just signed a joint
statement in which he reaffirmed his
unwavering commitment to
complete denuclearization of the
Korean peninsula. We also agreed to
vigorous negotiations to implement
the agreement as soon as possible and he
wants to do that,” Trump said at a press
conference, adding that North Korea will
destroy a major missile-testing site as an
outside gesture of good faith.

Trump expressed major optimism at the signing ceremony,

saying,

“We are very proud of what took place

The text also indicates that Trump gave security
guarantees to the North Korean regime in exchange for
201
today. I think our whole relationship with
North Korea and the Korean peninsula is
going to be a very much different situation
than it has in the past,” adding “people are
going to be very impressed, people are
going to be very happy, and we are going
 to take care of a very big and very
dangerous problem for the world.”
The president also noted he would “absolutely” invite Kim
Jong Un to the White House.
202
Kim Jong Un also told reporters “today, we
had a historic meeting and decided to leave
the past behind and we are about to sign
the historic document,” adding “The world
will see a major change.”
 Glum MSNBC: Just Because Summit
Hasn’t Happened Before, ‘Doesn’t Mean It’s Historic’
By Scott Whitlock
June 12, 2018 8:51 AM EDT
Glum is a word that described the reaction on MSNBC to
the North Korean summit. With an annoyed tone, the
Morning Joe hosts of Tuesday mocked the chances for
success in the summit between Donald Trump and Kim
Jong-un. MSNBC guest Jon Meacham even denied that the
summit was “historic.”
Talking to Joe Scarborough, the Time contributing editor
whined:
“Just because something hasn't
happened before, doesn't mean it's
historic.
That's one thing. I think when you call
something historic, it means it has a good
chance of having lasting implications. And I
think it's very unclear, at least to my
layman's eye, that this does that.”
Even other liberal media outlets didn't try this spin. The
graphic for CBS This Morning touted a “historic
denuclearization deal.” ABC’s Good Morning America
saw a “historic summit.” NBC’s Today called the two
leaders talking a “historic meeting.”
203
Also, it should be pointed out to Mr. Meacham that media
outlets love to use the word “historic” for liberal
accomplishments. ABC hailed Barack Obama’s “historic”
Cairo speech. CBS cheered the “historic victory" for
ObamaCare.
Scarborough was downright bitter in his reaction to the
summit. Reacting to Trump’s effort to push economic
possibilities, such as hotels and condos in North Korea, he
sarcastically sneered:
We hear that history rhymes.... I mean, you can go from
whether you're talking about what happened at the
Appomattox Court House or talking about what happened
in Versailles during the Paris Peace Accords of 1919 or
even Kissinger going to Paris to end the Vietnam War,
they talked about beachfront condos. That's the great —
that's the great equalizer here between nations.
A partial transcript is below:
Morning Joe
6/12/18
6:18
DONALD TRUMP: You could have the best hotels in the world
right there. Think of it from a real estate perspective. You have
South Korea, you have China and they own the land in the
middle. How bad is that, right? It's great.
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: So, Joe, I think it might be time for some
deep historic parallels and perspective on that comment and so
many others.
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Jonn Meacham, this is just too easy. We
hear that history rhymes. Here, it is — it's just the same words
used in verse one and verse two where I mean you can go from
whether you're talking about what happened at the Appomattox
Court House or talking about what happened in Versailles during
the Paris Peace Accords of 1919 or even Kissinger going to Paris
to end the Vietnam War, they talked about beachfront condos.
That's the great — that's the great equalizer here between
nations. It is — that — it is Donald Trump still, Donald Trump
the real estate developer, and he doesn't realize that this dictator
doesn't want beach condos. He wants nuclear weapons. And I
don't think he has any plans to go the way of Gaddafi.
204
JON MEACHAM: Yeah. Remember, George Kennan's great
telegram how to lay out the hospitality industry throughout the
Soviet Union.
SCARBOROUGH: Yeah.
GEORGE MEACHAM: It's a -- Richard actually keeps a copy of
that on his desk, I think.
SCARBOROUGH: Yeah.
MEACHAM: Two thoughts. Just because something hasn't
happened before, doesn't mean it's historic. That's one thing. I
think when you call something historic, it means it has a good
chance of having lasting implications. And I think it's very
unclear, at least to my layman's eye, that this does that.
 Wow! Jim Acosta On Hot Mic:
“If They’re Not Going To Let Me In The F*Cking Meeting,
That’s What Happens!” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 8:54 Am

came stepped out of their meetings —

then Acosta was caught in a hot mic
moment.

Jim Acosta:

Mr. President, how is the meeting going so

Jim Acosta caught on a hot mic after
blurting out questions at President
Trump during Singapore Summit–
far, sir?… Any progress, Mr. President?…
Mr. President, how’s it going so far, sir?
What do you think?
President Trump (from balcony with Kim Jong Un):

“If They’re Not Going to Let Me in the Very, very good.

F*cking Meeting, That’s What Happens!”
Jim Acosta:

Mr. Kim will you give up your nuclear

weapons, sir?

Jim Acosta:

(After President Trump and Kim Jong Un

exit the balcony) Hey, if they’re not going to
let me in the fucking meeting, then that’s
what happens.”

Here’s the exchange captured by RT TV:

President Trump made history on Tuesday. The US
president somehow brought the tyrant of North Korea to (At 2:41:00 in video)
the table to sign the most important nuclear agreement in
the last 70 years for the Korean people. Via The Donald Reddit:

Months of hard work and diplomacy reached a climax on

Tuesday. The moment will go down in history. Then
CNN’s Jim Acosta, the darling of the disruptive left,
started blurting out questions at the president whenever the
two leaders came into view.

At one point Trump and Kim Jong Un

paused on the balcony during their
talks.

Jim Acosta started blurting out

questions whenever the two leaders

205
 Rep. Lee Zeldin To Trump-Bashers:
Obama Didn’t Even Get Iran To Sign
His Nuclear Deal (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 10:32 Am

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) blasted the Trump-bashers after
the president’s historic summit with North Korean leader
Kim Jong Un.
Zeldin remind the FOX Business Network audience that
Barack Obama did not even get the Iranian regime to sign
the JCPOA nuclear agreement.
Trump and Kim Jong Un signed their
nuclear disarmament agreement.
And Kim promised reaffirmed his firm and unwavering
commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean
Peninsula.

And Barack Obama gave the Iranian

regime $50 billion and a pallet of cash.

206
 Chris Matthews: Dems, Media Must
Remind America What Decency,
Morality Is In Trump Era
By Kristine Marsh
June 12, 2018 10:52 AM EDT
It was a case of the pot calling the kettle black on CBS’s
The Late Show Monday evening, when guest Chris
Matthews rallied his fellow liberals and members of the
media to show the world what “moral goodness” is, while
Trump’s in office.
In the long winded conversation June 11, the pair talked
about Trump’s historic summit with North Korean leader
Kim Jong-un, among other things, and Matthews revealed
he didn’t have any confidence in Trump’s dealmaking. The
Hardball host took issue with Trump attempting to
develop a relationship with Kim Jong-Un.
“These are awful people, and he wants
to become best friends with them,” the
MSNBC host lamented. Surprisingly,
Colbert pushed back, gently offering that it
would be a good thing if Trump did
succeed. “If he succeeds, God bless him!”
the CBS host noted.
But Matthews just shook his head.
“This is not a date. It's not lunch. It's not
going to work,” he snarked.
Quite the take coming from the same man who had no
problem or doubts about the Obama Administration
negotiating in 2015 with a foreign dictator who oppressed
his people. In fact, Matthews was so enamored with
Obama’s catastrophic Iran Deal, that he suggested it
should be illegal for a sitting Senator to criticize it.
207
But Matthews wasn’t done revealing just how un self-
aware he was. Towards the end of the talk, he solemnly
warned his fellow liberals and journalists to not “lower”
themselves to Trump’s “level” by talking like him. Instead,
he urged, they must bear the standards of goodness and
decency:
We have to be just as tough on the
opposition these days because what De
Niro did the other night -- you have to be
careful about this because I think the
cultural world, your world, to some extent
the Democrats, certainly the media,
have got to uphold what nobility is in
this country through these years.
They have to remind people about what
they're not having, which is a sense of
nobility of life on the planet and a sense
of moral goodness.
I think Trump is lowering us to a standard. It's said in war
you end up imitating your enemy in war. You become as
barbarous as they are. The trouble with the criticism with
Trump now is it's going down to the level of Trump.
People are starting to talk like him. It’s really going to hurt
the opposition.
Matthews couldn’t be a worse messenger for this task.
After all, he is known for his quick temper on his MSNBC
show and has been accused of being verbally abusive and
inappropriate with staffers. Colbert is no better, regularly
making obscene and crude remarks about Republicans on
his CBS show. He seemed to acknowledge this fact to
Matthews:
COLBERT: I agree with you, and I can be
guilty of that myself -- ( laughter ) -- I don't
know what they're laughing at -- but
ultimately, in all your criticism of the man,
you can’t forget have to wish the best for
the presidency and that, in instance for this
case, he finds peace. Keep your eye on
.
what the prize should be and criticize the
man as much as you want.
“We have to remind ourselves we're
Americans,” Matthews surmised.
“God bless America,” Colbert agreed,
closing the interview.

208
 AMAZING! Trump Showed Kim Jong-Un
Powerful Video Promising “A New World” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 11:30 Am

The promise of a “new world” was presented to North

Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Tuesday (Jun 12), in a
video made especially for him and shown at the historic
summit between him and United States President Donald
Trump.

The video, which was about four minutes long, was shown
by Mr. Trump to Mr. Kim on Tuesday when the two
leaders met. It was also aired – in both a Korean and an
English version – before Mr. Trump gave a press briefing
later that day.

President Donald J. Trump met with North Korean leader

Kim Jong Un in Singapore Tuesday for historic peace
talks.

Here is the video President Trump

prepared for North Korea.
During their meetings President Trump showed the North
Korean leader a video promising “a new world.” There is also a Korean language version.

Channel News Asia reported:

209
.

210
 Joe Scarborough: Trump ‘Sick’ For
Ignoring Human Rights In North Korea (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 12, 2018, 11:34 Am
Defying decades of simmering tensions between the
United States and Communist North Korea, President
Trump made history Monday leaving a face-to-face
meeting in Singapore with North Korean leader Kim Jong
Un, with a signed a document stating Pyongyang would
work toward
“complete denuclearization of the Korean
Peninsula.”
In a press conference following his meeting with Jong Un,
Trump explained the human rights record regarding North
Korea was discussed during the meeting, but the primary
goal was to negotiate denuclearization.
Trump also noted that the meeting with Jong Un may not
have happened if not for the death of Otto Warmbier, a
college student who was arrested in North Korea in 2016
for allegedly stealing a propaganda poster. Warmbier was
sentenced to 15 years in prison and fell into a coma while
incarcerated. He was brought back to the U.S. in June 2017
only to die a few days later.
Rather than celebrating Trump’s historic achievements,
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough railed against the President
Tuesday morning, claiming the Commander-in-Chief is
“sick” for not publicly condemning North Korea’s human
right’s record during the summit and repudiating the
Communist regime’s treatment of Warmbier.
“I thought it was tortured logic at best to
say that the North Koreans murder of Otto
Warmbier was a time of reflection for them
– that’s just not true at all. I personally think
it’s sick for him to suggest such a thing
about the most murderous regime, one of
211
the most murderous regimes on the face of
the earth,” Scarborough lamented.
“We learned after the fall of the Soviet
Union, that when Reagan became
president and started talking constantly
about the liberation of Russians and people
in eastern Europe and talked about
freedom there were whispers in gulags in
the Soviet about tapping on the walls,
about ‘Reagan the liberator.’ he brought
hope to those who were imprisoned there
with great moral authority and he helped to
end the cold war,” he continued. “Here, you
have Donald trump who has made it clear
that – well, that human rights aren’t going
to be a part of any negotiations.”
Trump is too simple-minded to understand
human rights is the “hallmark of sound
American policy,” Scarborough’s guest,
presidential historian Jon Meacham,
added.
“Complexity is not Donald Trump’s friend,
obviously, and never has been and isn’t
here,” he said. “Suddenly that personal
characteristic – his need to simplify
everything, to make a deal out of it in which
he is a protagonist and the person across
the table is a co-star to some extent, is now
intersecting with the life of nations.”
Unlike Reagan, who “knew how to make a deal,”
Meacham noted, Trump’s foreign policy is not “humane.”
 “Remember [Reagan] said his philosophy
of the Cold War, ‘we win/you lose,’ but
that’s the caricature. that was the union
negotiator, he understood how to make a
deal. He was deeply concerned about the
human rights abuses and was someone
who rejected the real politic of ideas of
détente in the 1970s, the Henry Kissinger
.
212
view,” he said. “Reagan did bring a moral
dimension to policy. George Herbert
Walker Bush, who is 94 today, did much
the same thing as he managed the end
of the cold war. We don’t have to be
sentimental to be humane – and I think that
is the hallmark of the sound American
policy.
 Nancy Pelosi Trashes Trump After Kim Summit:
Trump Handed Kim Concessions In Exchange
For Vague Promises
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 12:25 Pm

Apparently, the President handed Kim

President Donald J. Trump met with North Korean leader
Kim Jong Un in Singapore Tuesday for historic peace
talks.
But not everyone was excited with the
new chance for peace on the Korean
peninsula.
Jong-un concessions in exchange for
vague promises that do not approach a
clear and comprehensive pathway to
denuclearization and non-proliferation.
“In his haste to reach an agreement,
President Trump elevated North Korea to
the level of the United States while
preserving the regime’s status quo. The
millions of families currently living in fear of
nuclear weapons in the region deserve
strong and smart leadership built on
diplomacy and engagement with our
regional partners and allies.
“The President’s marginalization of the vast
expertise of the State Department and his
habitual disparaging of our allies as
demonstrated at the G7 Forum hinders a
lasting, stable pathway to peace.”

Minority leader Nancy Pelosi trashed

President Trump after the historic
meetings.

Pelosi was as clueless and insulting as you would expect.

“Nuclear nonproliferation is a pillar of

America’s national security. We respect
any serious and real diplomatic efforts to
achieve that goal on the Korean peninsula.
.

213
 Fmr. Senator: Dems Should Be
Trump’s ‘Loyal Opposition,’ ‘Not MSNBC’
By Kyle Drennen
June 12, 2018 1:26 PM EDT
While appearing on MSNBC Live With Stephanie Ruhle on
Tuesday, former Democratic New Jersey Senator Robert
Torricelli complained that members of his own party were
not denouncing President Trump’s summit with North
Korean leader Kim Jong-un and even took the liberal
media to task for seizing the role of the political
opposition.
When anchor Stephanie Ruhle asked,
“What can the Democratic Party really
do?,” Torricelli responded: “What you’re
doing. The loyal opposition in America
is not the press, with all due respect, it’s
the Democratic Party.” He went on to add
that objections to the president’s foreign
policy should “come from the
Democratic Party, not MSNBC.”
Ruhle did not agree with Torricelli’s assessment:
“But, Bob. Both Democrats and
Republicans have been silenced by a
bully. The only group that hasn’t been is
the press.”
The retired lawmaker’s fellow panelist, CNBC contributor
Ron Insana, jumped in by citing an oft-quoted warning
about those who did not stand up to the Nazis:
Silence is complicity, Stephanie, I mean
this is the problem. And historically that
has been the problem when people say,
“You know, first they came for this group
and we did nothing. Then they came for
this group and we did nothing. And
214
ultimately they come for everybody.” I’m
not saying that that’s where we’re going,
but silence is absolutely complicity. And so,
the press is not –
Ruhle interrupted:
“But he's neutered them! He’s hijacked
his own party and they’ve allowed it to
happen.”
Insana added:
“He’s gas-lighted everybody, too. And
that’s a problem.”
The fact that Ruhle seems unwilling to relinquish her role
as Trump’s opposition is very telling. It’s reflective of the
attitude of many of her media colleagues.
Here is a transcript of the June 12 exchange:
9:44 AM ET
(...)
STEPHANIE RUHLE: Where’s the GOP, Bob? Where are other
government leaders who understand history and understand
consequences? The GOP is silent and who’s the man standing
next to Trump, whether it’s in Canada or in Singapore? You’ve
got John Bolton. So help me understand what the rest of the
party’s thinking.
FMR. SEN. ROBERT TORRICELLI [D-NJ]: Well, how about
where are both parties?
RUHLE: Oh, there you go.
TORRICELLI: The President of the United States just went to an
unscripted summit with North Korea, unilaterally gave away
American exercises. We’re now undermining these sanctions.
North Korea now has established itself as a permanent nuclear
power, a nation with 100,000 political prisoners. Where’s the
Democratic Party on the human rights aspect of this? Where’s
the Republican Party establishment on national security?
 RUHLE: But, Bob. Both Democrats and Republicans have been
silenced by a bully. The only group that hasn’t been is the press.

RON INSANA [CNBC CONTRIBUTOR]: Silence is complicity,

Stephanie, I mean this is the problem. And historically that has
been the problem when people say, “You know, first they came
for this group and we did nothing. Then they came for this group
and we did nothing. And ultimately they come for everybody.” I’m
not saying that that’s where we’re going, but silence is absolutely
complicity. And so, the press is not –

RUHLE: But he's neutered them! He’s hijacked his own party and
RUHLE: But what can the Democratic Party really do? they’ve allowed it to happen.

TORRICELLI: What you’re doing. The loyal opposition in America INSANA: He’s gas-lighted everybody, too. And that’s a problem.
is not the press, with all due respect, it’s the Democratic Party.
Questions about national security, the competence of the (...)
administration, preparation, whether or not we’re abusing our
allies, whether or not we’re breaking our standing commitments.
They come from the Democratic Party, not MSNBC.

215
 'The View' Bashes Trump For Meeting
Kim Jong-Un: Went ‘Too Far!’
By Kristine Marsh
June 12, 2018 1:27 PM EDT

Joy Behar scoffed that if things didn’t work out, Trump

would never admit he dropped the ball.

“Donald Trump said, if I’m wrong, I will

admit it. Yeah right! When pigs fly! When
did he ever admit he wasn’t right?” she said
in disgust.

Hostin complained that Trump gave the leader too much

If there’s a way of turning a positive into a negative,
liberals in the media will certainly find a way to do it.
While Trump’s accomplishments hardly ever get noticed
by the hosts of The View, the historic meeting with North
Korean leader Kim Jong-un was so important, they had to
acknowledge it on Tuesday’s show, but only to complain
about it.
To make matters worse, some of the hosts had completely
opposite reactions with President Obama met with foreign
dictators.
Host Whoopi Goldberg began the segment calling the
meeting “historic” but doubted that either man would keep
their promise.
“Can we take Kim Jong-un at his word and
can we take the guy in the White House at
his word?” she posed to the panel.
Host Meghan McCain wasn’t happy that there wasn’t talk
about the country’s human rights violations, while host
Sunny Hostin claimed that Trump didn’t prepare enough
for the meeting.
credit. She explained how former Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright came on the show previously and
shared her story of how Kim Jong Un’s father didn’t hold
his end of the bargain, when she met with him during the
Clinton years.
“So, to believe that Kim Jong-un is going to
give away his nuclear arsenal, which really
gives him the power...I think we went too
far in perhaps giving him validity,” she
stated.
McCain pushed back against this negative take.
“We haven’t gone too far because nothing’s
happened yet,” she quickly shot back. As
the table engaged in cross-talk, McCain
added, “You just said we went too far by
even meeting with him.”
“I think the president meeting with him
without any preconditions certainly gave
him the credibility that he wants,” Hostin
argued.

“We are talking about nuclear

diplomacy...our country wasn’t as prepared
as it should be,” she lamented.
“We can’t underestimate how historic this
is, though,” McCain added. “I never thought
I’d see this in my lifetime,” she noted,
before adding that she didn’t like how the
two countries’ flags were placed next to
each other and how Trump talked about
buying property there.

216
Host Sara Haines attempted to be reconcile the two hosts’ Iran, they don't like it. He opens up
opinions. dialogue with Cuba, they don't like it.”

“Perhaps this meeting could’ve gone been She added,

more clear and could’ve gone better, the
fear was, that it would go worse. It would
end in defiance,” she started to say. But
before things got too heated, host Whoopi
Goldberg cut to a break.
“No matter what he does, when a
Republican does it, they love it. When
he does it, they hate it. That's their MO.
Just be aware of it.”

This reaction from the table is stereotypically hypocritical.

When Obama was in office, Joy Behar praised the
president for meeting with dictators and trying to negotiate
peace. Here’s what she had to say in a now
hilarious flashback from a March 21, 2016 episode of the
View:

Behar complained,

“President Obama is reaching across

the aisle. He opens up dialogue with

217
 Just In Time To Embarrass Trump,
New York Times Reports North Korea's A Dictatorship
By Clay Waters
June 12, 2018 1:33 PM EDT
“Atrocities Under Kim Jong-un: Indoctrination, Prison
Gulags, Executions” is a solid, depressing rundown of the
totalitarian state in Monday’s New York Times. So what
took the paper so long to acknowledge the brutality of the
regime? The timing seems calculated to embarrass
President Trump, in Singapore at a summit meeting with
the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
With the meeting of President Trump and Kim Jong-un of
North Korea on Tuesday in Singapore, human rights
groups are watching for Mr. Trump to bring up North
Korea’s widespread crimes against humanity.
Mr. Kim rules with extreme brutality, making his nation
among the worst human rights violators in the world.
In North Korea, these crimes “entail
extermination, murder, enslavement,
torture, imprisonment, rape, forced
abortions and other sexual violence,
persecution on political, religious, racial
and gender grounds, the forcible transfer of
populations, the enforced disappearance of
persons and the inhumane act of knowingly
causing prolonged starvation,” concluded a
2014 United Nations report that examined
North Korea.
They described the gulags in graphic detail.
People accused of political crimes are
arrested and sentenced to prison camps
without trials, while their families are often
kept in the dark about their whereabouts.
Up to 120,000 inmates were in the
218
country’s four major political prisons in
2014 and were subjected to gruesome
conditions, according to the United Nations
report.
Prisoners are starved, forced to work,
tortured and raped. Reproductive rights are
denied through forced abortions and
infanticide. Some are executed --
sometimes in public. Hundreds of
thousands of political prisoners have died
in the camps over the past 50 years, the
United Nations report found.
....
Often the first human rights violations
Westerners ascribe to North Korea, aside
from preventing North Koreans from
leaving the country, are the lengths it takes
to indoctrinate its citizens.
The Times even mentioned the persecution of Christians,
not exactly a running theme at the paper.
Christians are barred from practicing their
religion, and those caught doing so are
“subject to severe punishments,” the report
found. North Korean leaders also conflate
Christians with those detained in prison
camps, those who try to flee and “others
considered to introduce subversive
influences,” the report stated.
The Times brought up the regimes use of starvation as a
political tool:
Two million to three million people were
believed to have died during an extended
famine in North Korea in the 1990s, The
New York Times reported in 1999, around
when the country began to recover.
At the time, North Korea used food as a tool to enforce
political loyalty, prioritizing its distribution based on who
was most useful to the nation’s political system, the United
Nations report stated.
It makes quite a change from the paper’s usual soft-
pedaled treatment of the North Korean dictatorship. The
paper’s coverage of the 2018 Winter Olympics in
PyeongChan, South Korea in February was particularly
bad, too obsessed with showing up Vice President Mike
Pence to talk about North Korean atrocities, under the
headline “Kim Jong-un’s Sister Turns on the Charm,
Taking Pence’s Spotlight.” The Times gushed about the
dictator’s sister on the front page:
When the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-
un, decided to send a large delegation to
the Winter Olympics in South Korea this
month, the world feared he might steal the
show.
If that was indeed his intention, he could
not have chosen a better emissary than
the one he sent: his only sister, Kim Yo-
jong, whom news outlets in the South
.
219
instantly dubbed “North Korea’s
Ivanka,” likening her influence to that of
Ivanka Trump on her father, President
Trump.
....
Flashing a sphinx-like smile and without
ever speaking in public, Ms. Kim
managed to outflank Mr. Trump’s envoy
to the Olympics, Vice President Mike
Pence, in the game of diplomatic image-
making.
The Times has a long history of ignoring the dictatorial
nature of the North Korea regime. A March 2013 dispatch
described then-new dictator Kim Jong-un as merely "a
young new leader," while South Korea's female president
was described as the daughter of "a military strongman."
 Judge Rules Mueller Must Identify
Unnamed Individuals In Manafort Indictment
By Avery Anapol
06/12/18 01:38 Pm Edt
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that special counsel Robert
Mueller must identify the unnamed individuals in his
recent superseding indictment of former Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort.
Mueller last week indicted Manafort and his former
aide, Konstantin Kilimnik, on a series of charges related to
lobbying work on behalf of Ukraine.
The indictment accused Manafort and Kilimnik of
obstructing justice by attempting to tamper with witnesses
in the investigation.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Mueller to turn over
the names of several individuals and organizations,
including European politicians and other Manafort
.
220
contacts, to Manafort’s attorneys, according to court
documents and reports by Politico.
The New York Times reported last week that two veteran
journalists told Mueller that Manafort attempted to contact
them and tried to shape their testimony. Three Times
sources identified the journalists as Alan Friedman and
Eckart Sager. Mueller’s indictment did not name the
witnesses that Manafort and Kilimnik allegedly contacted.
Jackson’s ruling comes in response to a motion from
Manafort’s team seeking more information on the
superseding indictment.
Jackson wrote that Mueller turning over the information
will help Manafort prepare for a “complex” trial, which is
expected in September.
“[The] defendant is obliged to prepare for a
complex trial with a voluminous record
within a relatively short period of time, and
he should not have to be surprised at a
later point by the addition of a new name or
allegation,” she wrote.
Manafort has also been indicted on multiple charges
related to financial crimes and is expected to go to trial
next month. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
 “HE IS AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE!”
Trump 2020 Campaign Chair Brad Parscale Calls For Jim
Acosta’s Press Credentials To Be Immediately Suspended
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 1:42 Pm

Jim Acosta started blurting out questions whenever the two

leaders came stepped out of their meetings — then Acosta
was caught in a hot mic moment.

Jim Acosta:

Mr. President, how is the meeting going so

far, sir?… Any progress, Mr. President?…
Mr. President, how’s it going so far, sir?
What do you think?

President Trump arrived in Singapore President Trump (from balcony with Kim Jong Un):
over the weekend for a historical, high
stakes meeting with North Korea’s Kim Very, very good.
Jong Un in an effort to negotiate the de-
nuclearization of the Korean peninsula. Jim Acosta:

President Trump made history on Tuesday. The US Mr. Kim will you give up your nuclear
president somehow brought the tyrant of North Korea to weapons, sir?
the table to sign the most important nuclear agreement in
the last 70 years for the Korean people.
Jim Acosta: (After President Trump and Kim Jong Un exit
the balcony)

Hey, if they’re not going to let me in the

fucking meeting, then that’s what happens.”
President Trump’s 2020 Campaign
Manager Brad Parscale slammed Jim
Acosta Tuesday morning calling for his
press credentials to be immediately
suspended after his latest disgraceful
stunt.

Parscale tweeted: Jim @Acosta should immediately have

his press credentials suspended. He is an absolute disgrace!
Months of hard work and diplomacy reached a climax on @realDonaldTrump
Tuesday. The moment will go down in history. Then
CNN’s Jim Acosta, the darling of the disruptive left,
started blurting out questions at the president whenever the
two leaders came into view.

At one point Trump and Kim Jong Un paused on the

balcony during their talks.

221
 Rosenstein Threatened To 'Subpoena'
GOP-Led Committee In 'Chilling' Clash
Over Records, Emails Show
By Catherine Herridge | Fox News
2:00pm 6/12/2018

Select Committee on Intelligence] and

Congress overall.”

A second House committee staffer at the meeting backed

up Patel’s account, writing: “Let me just add that watching
the Deputy Attorney General launch a sustained personal
attack against a congressional staffer in retaliation for
vigorous oversight was astonishing and disheartening. ...
Also, having the nation’s #1 (for these matters) law
enforcement officer threaten to 'subpoena your calls and
emails' was downright chilling.”

The committee staffer noted that Rosenstein’s comment

Aides on a GOP-led committee say Deputy Attorney General Rod could be interpreted as meaning the department would
Rosenstein threatened to subpoena their records in a tense meeting “vigorously defend a contempt action" -- which might be
earlier this year. (AP)
expected. But the staffer continued, "I also read it as a not-
so-veiled threat to unleash the full prosecutorial power of
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened to the state against us.”
“subpoena” emails, phone records and other documents
from lawmakers and staff on a Republican-led House
committee during a tense meeting earlier this year,
according to emails reviewed by Fox News documenting
the encounter and reflecting what aides described as a
"personal attack."

The emails memorialized a January 2018 closed-door

meeting involving senior FBI and Justice Department
officials as well as members of the House Intelligence
Committee. The account claimed Rosenstein threatened to
turn the tables on the committee's inquiries regarding the
Russia probe.

“The DAG [Deputy Attorney General

Rosenstein] criticized the Committee for
sending our requests in writing and was
further critical of the Committee’s request
to have DOJ/FBI do the same when
Representatives with both the DOJ and FBI disputed the
responding,” the committee's then-senior
account in the emails.
counsel for counterterrorism Kash Patel
wrote to the House Office of General
Counsel. “Going so far as to say that if the “The FBI disagrees with a number of
Committee likes being litigators, then ‘we characterizations of the meeting as
[DOJ] too [are] litigators, and we will described in the excerpts of a staffer’s
subpoena your records and your emails,’ emails provided to us by Fox News,” the
referring to HPSCI [House Permanent FBI said in a statement.
222
A DOJ official told Fox News that Rosenstein “never
threatened anyone in the room with a criminal
investigation.” The official said the department and bureau
officials in the room “are all quite clear that the
characterization of events laid out here is false,” adding
that Rosenstein was responding to a threat of contempt.
“The Deputy Attorney General was making
the point—after being threatened with
contempt — that as an American
citizen charged with the offense of
contempt of Congress, he would have the
right to defend himself, including requesting
production of relevant emails and text
messages and calling them as witnesses to
demonstrate that their allegations are
false,” the official said. “That is why he put
them on notice to retain relevant emails
and text messages, and he hopes they did
so. (We have no process to obtain such
records without congressional approval.)”
Further, the official said that when Rosenstein returns to
the United States from a work trip,
“he will request that the House General
counsel conduct an internal investigation of
these Congressional staffers’ conduct.”
Details of the January 2018 meeting first trickled out in the
immediate aftermath. Fox News' Gregg Jarrett tweeted in
February on the purported subpoena threat.
But the emails, reviewed by Fox News, provide additional
details about that encounter. A former Justice Department
official said the account may help explain how the
relationship between the DOJ and the Republican-led
House committee has broken down in the months since.
223
“This is much worse than a deteriorating
relationship – this is a massive breakdown
in the system. A deputy attorney general
does not make subpoena threats
lightly. This is not the norm to say the
least,” Tom Dupree, the former principal
deputy assistant attorney general under the
George W. Bush administration, told Fox
News. “It’s hard to tell whether [Rosenstein]
was sending a message to back off, or
whether he was just trying to illustrate how
invasive he considered the demands from
Congress. But either way, it is a clear
signal that the relationship is fractured, and
it’s not clear how things will get repaired.”
The tense session over the boundaries of congressional
oversight – and the Justice Department's concern for
protecting sources and methods – appears to have set the
tone for a sustained records dispute as well as the latest
confrontation over Chairman Devin Nunes’ request for
information related to an alleged FBI confidential human
source who was in contact with the Trump campaign.
A senior Justice Department official said Rosenstein and
others have offered to meet Thursday with a group of
House leaders known as the Gang of Eight. In a letter,
Nunes, R-Calif. – whose staffers documented the Jan. 10
meeting – made clear he wants the records made available
to all intelligence committee members and select staff two
days earlier.
The Jan. 10 meeting came amid government surveillance
abuse allegations, outstanding House subpoenas for Russia
probe records and the looming threat of contempt. The
Capitol Hill session pertained to a request for a sensitive
document, according to the emails – and included
Rosenstein, Associate Deputy Attorney General Scott
Schools, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs
Stephen Boyd, then-FBI Assistant Director Greg Brower
and FBI Director Christopher Wray, as well as Nunes and
three committee staffers.
The emails reviewed by Fox News show at least two
committee staffers memorialized their concerns about the
deputy attorney general’s alleged statements, at the request
of the Office of General Counsel.
“I know I’ve relayed the following to you
over the phone, and per your suggestion
reducing it to writing so there is at least
some record of the event,” wrote Patel,
who is now the committee's national
security adviser.
The two staffers were pressed on whether Rosenstein
could justify the comments as
 "merely referring to how DOJ would
vigorously defend any litigation that the
committee might initiate?” –
- an apparent reference to Nunes' threat to hold Rosenstein
and Wray in contempt for not providing records.
“I took ... it as the DAG’s clearly articulated
course of action should the committee
continue its investigation in the current
manner, which he found unacceptable and
improper. It was not in response to how
they would defend litigation (ie contempt or
the like),” Patel responded. "It was about
leaks, source contact, and other alleged
disclosures by the committee."
Asked about the January meeting, Nunes provided a
statement to Fox News noting they referred the incident to
House Speaker Paul Ryan’s office:
“The Intelligence Committee considers staff
concerns at the most serious level,
especially those involving interactions with
the executive branch. Based on the
justified concerns expressed by our lead
staff investigators, we referred this matter
to the Speaker’s Office.”
.
224
Fox News provided extensive quotes from the emails and
offered an opportunity to respond to all parties. The House
Office of General Counsel declined to comment. A source
close to the speaker said they “encouraged the Committee
to work through the non-partisan DOJ Inspector General’s
Office.”
A committee source said
“going to DOJ IG is one of several steps
under consideration.”
The DOJ official later said in an email that "no formal
complaint was ever filed [with] the GC or IG." The official
also said that Rosenstein and Nunes
"went to dinner with a mutual friend the
night of this meeting and the chairman
didn't raise any concerns about the
conversation at that dinner."
Dupree, though, said the tensions between Congress and
the Justice Department go well beyond the traditional
oversight negotiations.
"Rarely, if ever, has it deterioriated to this
point where you have what appears to be
threats going back and forth between the
two sides," he said.
 REPORT: Trump Lawyer
Michael Cohen Expects To Be Arrested Soon
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 2:08 Pm
An attorney for Trump, Michael Cohen
has been telling his friends lately he
expects to be arrested any day now,
according to a report by the New York
Daily News.
The New York Daily News reported:
The longtime attorney and personal fixer to
President Trump expects to be put in cuffs
any day now, possibly opening up his top
client to legal complications, a person
familiar with the matter said Tuesday.
Cohen has been telling friends he fears his
arrest is imminent, the source told the Daily
News. Cohen remains under federal
investigation for bank fraud and campaign
finance violations, potential offenses that
resulted in FBI raids at his Manhattan
home, hotel room and office in April.
Michael Cohen would not be under a microscope but not
for his association with President Trump.
225
FBI agents raided the office and home
of one of Trump’s personal lawyers
Michael Cohen in April at the request of
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, with
Rosenstein’s blessing.
According to the Washington Post, FBI agents took
Cohen’s computer, phone and personal financial records
as part of the search of his office at Rockefeller Center.
The New York Times first reported the FBI raid collected
documents related to Michael Cohen’s payment to porn
star Stormy Daniels in October of 2016.
Since the FBI raid, Michael Cohen’s bank records have
leaked to the public through Stormy Daniels’ lawyer,
Michael Avenatti, creating more legal problems for Cohen.
Others in Cohen’s inner circle have been a target of
investigators in an effort to get Cohen to cooperate with
Robert Mueller.
A few weeks ago, Evgeny A. Freidman,
Michael Cohen’s business partner in a
taxi cab venture quietly decided to
cooperate with the government as a
potential witness to avoid jail time.
Robert Mueller could then use this as leverage to pressure
Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen to work with the
Special Counsel investigation into ‘Russian interference.’
Since Mueller has nothing on President Trump and his so-
called collusion with the Russians, his team of hack
lawyers have focused on anyone connected to Trump in an
effort to destroy people’s lives.
 JUST IN: Rosenstein Threatened To Subpoena Emails,
Phone Records Of Nunes And House Intel If They
Didn’t Stop Investigation
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 3:22 Pm
Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein threatened to subpoena
emails, phone records and other
documents of Republican lawmakers on
the House Intel Committee back in
January, confirming previous reports.
Fox News Catherine Herridge reported:
The emails memorialized a January 2018
closed-door meeting involving senior FBI
and Justice Department officials as well as
members of the House Intelligence
Committee. The account claimed
Rosenstein threatened to turn the tables on
the committee’s inquiries regarding the
Russia probe.
“The DAG [Deputy Attorney General
Rosenstein] criticized the Committee for
sending our requests in writing and was
further critical of the Committee’s request
to have DOJ/FBI do the same when
responding,” the committee’s then-senior
counsel for counterterrorism Kash Patel
wrote to the House Office of General
Counsel. “Going so far as to say that if the
Committee likes being litigators, then ‘we
[DOJ] too [are] litigators, and we will
subpoena your records and your emails,’
referring to HPSCI [House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence] and
Congress overall.”
A second House committee staffer at the meeting backed
up Patel’s account, writing:
226
“Let me just add that watching the Deputy
Attorney General launch a sustained
personal attack against a congressional
staffer in retaliation for vigorous oversight
was astonishing and disheartening. …
Also, having the nation’s #1 (for these
matters) law enforcement officer threaten
to ‘subpoena your calls and emails’ was
downright chilling.”
The committee staffer noted that Rosenstein’s comment
could be interpreted as meaning the department would
“vigorously defend a contempt action” — which might be
expected. But the staffer continued,
“I also read it as a not-so-veiled threat to
unleash the full prosecutorial power of the
state against us.”
Of course the FBI and DOJ are disputing this account and
defending Rosenstein.
The swamp always protects their own.
A DOJ official told Fox News that Rosenstein “never
threatened anyone in the room with a criminal
investigation.” The official said the department and bureau
officials in the room “are all quite clear that the
characterization of events laid out here is false,” adding
that Rosenstein was responding to a threat of contempt.
“The Deputy Attorney General was making
the point—after being threatened with
contempt — that as an American
citizen charged with the offense of
contempt of Congress, he would have the
right to defend himself, including requesting
production of relevant emails and text
messages and calling them as witnesses to
demonstrate that their allegations are
false,” the official said. “That is why he put
them on notice to retain relevant emails
and text messages, and he hopes they did
so. (We have no process to obtain such
records without congressional approval.)”
The DOJ official also told Fox News that once Rosenstein
returns from a business trip, “he will request that the
House General counsel conduct an internal investigation of
these Congressional staffers’ conduct.”

This Fox News report confirms what attorney Gregg Jarrett

previously stated in early February.

Gregg Jarrett tweeted: A 2nd source has now confirmed

to me that, in a meeting on January 10, Deputy A-G
Rosenstein used the power of his office to threaten to Rosenstein should no longer serve as
subpoena the calls & texts of the Intel Committee to get it DAG, [if true] said Gregg Jarrett.
to stop it’s investigation of DOJ and FBI. Likely an Abuse
of Power & Obstruction.

Rod Rosenstein is the cancer of the Justice Department and

must be removed.

Gregg Jarrett says what Rosenstein did Sources say Rosenstein is behind the stonewalling and
is a crime. slow walking and attempted redactions of the much-
anticipated IG report.

Rosenstein is also trying to block Senate Judiciary

Chairman Chuck Grassley from interviewing FBI Special
Agent Joe Pientka because he has damning information on
the altered General Flynn 302’s.

227
 Senator Flags ‘Highly Questionable’
Redactions In Peter Strzok Texts
Chuck Ross | Reporter
4:03 PM 06/12/2018

Johnson asked Wray on May 11 to explain the “excessive”

redactions in the text messages, which Strzok exchanged
with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

Johnson, a Republican, met on June 7 with U.S. attorney

John Lausch, who the FBI and the Justice Department
tasked to handle congressional requests for documents
related to the Clinton email investigation. Congress has
also sought documents related to secret surveillance
warrants that the FBI and DOJ obtained against former
Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee
is asking the FBI about “highly questionable” redactions in
The text messages came to light during a Justice
text messages exchanged between two bureau officials
Department inspector general probe of the FBI’s handling
who worked on the Hillary Clinton and Trump campaign
of the Clinton email investigation. Strzok was removed
investigations.
from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into
Russian collusion because many of the messages showed
In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Wisconsin he and Page mocking and criticizing Donald Trump.
Sen. Ron Johnson flagged several redactions in text
messages, which he said the bureau made “without
In his letter to Wray, Johnson said the FBI has “slow-
apparent legitimate reasons.”
walked” document requests and has created “additional
barriers for the Committee in exercising its constitutional
Johnson singled out one October 2016 text message that oversight responsibilities.”
suggested that FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok
was locked in a battle with another government official
In one text message Johnson flagged, Strzok refers to an
over a secret surveillance warrant. In another July 2016
argument he was having with another person over a
text, Strzok suggested that the FBI lacked the resources to
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant. The
conduct a thorough investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use
Oct. 11, 2016 text was sent just 10 days before the FBI and
of a private email server.
Justice Department obtained a FISA warrant against
former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The messages were originally redacted when provided to
Congress earlier this year, but members of Johnson’s
Strzok was the top investigator on the Trump-Russia
committee staff were able to review less-redacted versions
investigation, which was codenamed “Crossfire
at the Justice Department last month.
Hurricane.”

“Currently fighting with Stu for this FISA,”

reads the unredacted text message.

Sen. Ron Johnson letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray (June 11, 2018)

228
An Aug. 5, 2016 text refers to a remark made during an The message was sent several days after the FBI opened
inter-agency meeting about the newly formed Trump- Crossfire Hurricane. “L.C.” has not been identified.
Russia probe.

The message refers to a person named “L.C.” who,

according to Strzok, said during the meeting that “the
White House is running this.”

Sen. Ron Johnson letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray (June 11, 2018)

The bureau also redacted text messages about the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Johnson flagged one heavily redacted
text message that Strzok sent to Page on July 26, 2016. In it, Strzok suggested the FBI would have conducted a more thorough
investigation of Clinton’s use of a private email server if the bureau had more resources.

Sen. Ron Johnson letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray (June 11, 2018)

“These redactions included the names and what appear to be initials of Justice Department or FBI employees,”
Johnson wrote in his letter. “Redacting the identities of these employees prevents the Committee from assessing the
need to request additional documents relating to these employees or requesting interviews with these employees.”
.

229
 FCC Chair Ajit Pai And His Family Still Require 24
Security Following Death Threats From Violent Leftists
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 3:47 Pm
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai told reporters his
family still needs 24 hour security
following the repeal of Obama’s net
neutrality rules.
Pai, his family and his in-laws have all
received threats since he since he rolled
back the net neutrality rules.
The Hill reported:
230
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman
Ajit Pai told The Wall Street Journal on Monday that he
and his family are still being threatened in the months
since the agency voted to roll back Obama-era net
neutrality rules.
Pai visited the newspaper’s offices on Monday, the day the
repeal went into effect, and said he has continued to
receive threats following the December vote. His wife and
in-laws have also received threatening phone calls and
messages at home and at work, according to Journal
opinion writer James Freeman.
Freeman wrote that Pai’s family “still requires 24-hour
security” as a result.
The repeal of the 2015 net neutrality rules went into effect
this week.
The FCC in December voted 3-2 along party lines to roll
back the regulations and shift authority for policing the
broadband industry to the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC).
 In A Bid To Hide Evidence, Mueller Claims
Russia Will Use Discovery From Junk Bot Case To
Spy On Witch Hunt And Americans
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 4:22 Pm

Robert Mueller’s team came up with a
new excuse as to why they don’t want to
cough up over 70 discovery requests by
indicted Russian company Concord
Management & Consulting.
Mueller’s liberal hack lawyers claim
Russia could use the evidence they
gather through discovery to spy on the
witch hunt and American citizens.
That’s right. Mueller is arguing a case
he brought to court is now a threat to
his own investigation.
say they’re worried information they
provide to the company’s attorneys
could end up in the hands of other
defendants or Russian spy agencies.
Mueller’s team says disclosure of the
information could compromise American
sources and methods for monitoring foreign
interference operations.
Prosecutors also want to bar other
defendants from accessing the materials
turned over in the case until they appear in
a U.S. court. That includes Yevgeny
Prigozhin, a wealthy businessman who
controls the company. He has ties to
Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Indicted Russian company, Concord

Management and Consulting wants to
play ball and blasted Mueller in court
recently, telling the Magistrate Judge,
“the government has indicted the
proverbial ham sandwich.”

Concord is seeking all of Mueller’s

evidence of the so-called conspiracy as
a part of their discovery rights.
Associated Press reported:
Mueller’s PR stunt is backfiring and it’s
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is
glorious.
worried that Russian intelligence services
will use a criminal case in Washington to
Former US Attorney Joe DiGenova
gather information about its investigation.
recently blasted Mueller for indicting a
case prematurely.
Prosecutors are asking a federal judge to
impose limits on the information that can be
They [Mueller] indicted a case prematurely against people
shared by attorneys for Concord
they thought would never show up from Russia and then
Management and Consulting LLC. The
one of the Russian companies hired lawyers and sent them
company is accused of funding a
to court to say ‘we’re here and we wanna plead not guilty
clandestine Russian social media operation
and we want a lot of discovery on your criminal case
aimed at interfering in the 2016 U.S.
against us,” DiGenova said.
presidential election.
This isn’t the first time Mueller’s lawyers
So far, only one defendant, Concord
went to great lengths to evade
Management and Consulting LLC, has
discovery requests in their own case.
appeared in the case, and prosecutors
231
Mueller has been begging a federal judge to indefinitely
delay the junk Russia bot case since he rolled out an
indictment prematurely.
Last month, lawyers defending Concord Management,
sparred with Mueller’s liberal hacks in court.
Concord Management’s lawyers began by accusing
Mueller’s team of ignoring over 70 discovery requests.
Rather, Mueller’s team offered to give Concord
Management’s lawyers a massive amount of social media
.
232
data from those dangerous trolls who sought to influence
the US election and the majority of it is in RUSSIAN.
It got worse…
Mueller’s lawyers admitted that they don’t even have
English translations for the Russian social media posts.
Dirty cop Mueller is not prepared to go to trial which is
why his corrupt lawyers are once again using the old
excuse discovery could ‘compromise sources and
methods.’
 DOJ Takes Down 2,300 Alleged
Child Sex Abusers In Massive National Operation
Anders Hagstrom | Justice Reporter
4:50 PM 06/12/2018
Law enforcement arrested more than 2,300 accused child
sex offenders and identified 383 children who have been
victims of sex abuse, the Department of Justice announced
Tuesday.
Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) task forces made
the arrests nationwide between March and May in a sweep
dubbed Operation Broken Heart, identifying an additional
195 offenders who produced child pornography or
committed child sex abuse, according to the DOJ. The 383
children were allegedly either forced to participate in the
production of child pornography or had suffered recent,
ongoing or past sexual abuse.
“No child should ever have to endure
sexual abuse,” Attorney General Jeff
Sessions said in the statement. “And yet, in
recent years, certain forms of modern
technology have facilitated the spread of
child pornography and created greater
incentives for its production. We at the
Department of Justice are determined to
strike back against these repugnant crimes.
It is shocking and very sad that in this one
.
233
operation, we have arrested more than
2,300 alleged child predators and
investigated some 25,200 sexual abuse
complaints. Any would-be criminal should
be warned: this Department will remain
relentless in hunting down those who
victimize our children.”
The 61 ICAC task force investigated more than 25,000
complaints of sexual abuse and targeted alleged sex
offenders in four categories. First, those who produce,
trade or possess child pornography; second, anyone who
enticed children online for sexual purposes; third, those
who engaged in child sex trafficking and finally, those
who traveled internationally or across state lines to
sexually abuse children.
President Donald Trump has made it a priority for his
administration to fight against online sex trafficking. The
President signed legislation in April aimed at punishing
websites that facilitate sex trafficking, such as
Backpage.com.
“I want to thank you for your courage, and
thank you for helping survivors across our
country,” Trump told victims of sex crimes
when he signed the bill. “And you are not
alone. You are not alone. And this is a very
important day. If we work together, we can
get the criminal traffickers off our streets
and off of the Internet. We can bring safety
and hope to every community across the
country, and we can create a culture that
respects the dignity of every child of God.”
 How Petty! CNN Panelists
Whine About Menu For North Korean Summit
By Randy Hall
June 12, 2018 5:35 PM EDT
Since the summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong-
un has received wall-to-wall press coverage, it’s not
surprising that analysts on CNN might struggle to come up
with a fresh angle on describing the event.
However, panelists on Monday’s edition of CNN Tonight
showed their displeasure with the entire process when they
grumbled about the list of items on the menu while
stating they’re “really hungry” for “some substance here.”
The first person to complain was global affairs analyst and
anti-Trump Republican Max Boot:
I enjoyed hearing the list of the menu
items. What I'm really hungry for is some
substance here because the glitz is great,
but this is like having ice cream before you
get the main meal.
I want something nourishing here, and
Kim Jong-un has to deliver
denuclearization in a verifiable and
irreversible manner as Trump and
[Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo and
others have demanded.
“You know, maybe we're going to be
surprised, but there are no indications
whatsoever leading up to the summit that
he will in fact do this,” Boot added. “And in
fact, there's been a downsizing of the
expectations from everybody concerned.”
Host Don Lemon then turned to CNN national security
analyst and former Obama official Samantha Vinograd,
who was nodding her head in agreement with her fellow
panelist’s perspective.
234
“I want to bring it back to the menu for a
second,” Vinograd stated, “not just
because I am hungry, but because typically
the White House releases these kinds of
details after, after for example, the French
president comes to White House or another
head of state comes for a state visit.”
“So by releasing the details of the menu,
this is again legitimatizing Kim Jong-un and
putting him on equal footing with other
world leaders, which is what he wants,” she
noted.
“And I really want to stress here that this
working lunch is perfunctory at this
juncture,” Vinograd added.
"If Sarah Sanders is in the room,” she
continued, and “if we have the press
secretary there, they are not diving into the
kind of classified details that are going to
lead to the substance that Max is
referencing.”
Lemon stated moments later that several other people were
in the room for that moment, including Pompeo, Sanders,
White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, National Security
Advisor John Bolton, diplomat Sung Kim and Matthew
Pottinger from the National Security Council.
“So what do you say to that?” he asked
foreign policy analyst Jonathan Wachte
regarding whether all those people were
necessary to the process.
If Lemon hoped this panelist would roundly criticize the
summit and its results, he was very disappointed.
“Well, there is a perfunctory aspect to it,”
Wachte replied. “I mean, you can't
anticipate that you're going to achieve so
much so quickly.”
He continued:
You know, all this is going to be ironed out
in the months and years ahead as they
actually go into the verification issues and
 other things should the summit all work out
and we head in that direction.
So yes, of course, you're not going to get ,as Max alluded
to, a fulfilling of that food in terms of substance at this
point.
“You can't have the president of the United
States sit down with the leader of a rogue
state and immediately start, you know,
working out the details right there and
then,” Wachte continued.
“We’ve heard some sense that there's a will
to actually get something down here, but
it's going to take time.”
.
235
The analyst then returned to the “food” motif of the
discussion.
“One particularly interesting thing about the
menu is I was thinking as you were reading
all that out, Don, the North Korean people,
if they knew what is being dished out there,
they can't even imagine the types of foods
that you've rolled off your tongue.”
Of course, any success by Trump is hard to swallow for
many of the analysts at CNN, most of whom had hoped
the menu of the event wouldn’t include the special
dessert of a potential Noble Peace Prize.
 Always Spicy. Papa Don’s Pizza Restaurant Plasters
President Trump On Their Front Window –
Promises ‘No Illegal Drivers’
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 5:29 Pm
A Papa Don’s Pizza store is celebrating
the Great President Trump this week
with life-size posters on their store
windows.

Here’s a close-up, via The Faction:

The restaurant also promises its

customers no illegal drivers.

UPDATE: The posters were created by “The Faction”, a

rogue Right Wing street art outfit. We’re 100% pro-
individualism and meritocracy, and 100% anti-identity
politics.

Their latest display was funded by an entrepreneur. He

stated:

“I wanted to help send a humorously-

delivered message that the immigration
crisis in America needs addressing.”

236
237
 “Wake Up Punchy!” – POTUS Takes A Blowtorch To
“Low IQ” De Niro ‘Too Many Shots To The Head’
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 5:52 Pm

As TGP’s Kristinn Taylor reported, actor

Robert DeNiro cursed President Donald
Trump live on stage at the
internationally broadcast Tony awards
Sunday night, saying twice, “F***
Trump!”

The unhinged actor cursed Trump

shortly after the President arrived in
Singapore over the weekend for a
historical, high-stakes meeting with Round two: …realize the economy is the best it’s ever
North Korea’s Kim Jong Un in an effort been with employment being at an all time high, and many
to negotiate the de-nuclearization of the companies pouring back into our country. Wake up
Korean peninsula. Punchy!
On Tuesday, President Trump torched
the Hollywood snake, accusing DeNiro
of being “punch-drunk” after being
punched in the head too many times in
his movies.

Consumer confidence is at an 18-year high, unemployment

is low, even for minorities, yet leave it to out-of-touch
Hollywood losers like DeNiro to continue attacking
Trump.

DeNiro is becoming more and more like Nancy Pelosi in

his old age. He should take a seat while the adults do work.
Mr. President, please never stop
tweeting!

President Trump slammed DeNiro in a pair of hard-hitting

tweets on Tuesday.

Trump tweeted: Robert De Niro, a very Low IQ

individual, has received to (sic) many shots to the head by
real boxers in movies. I watched him last night and truly
believe he may be “punch-drunk.” I guess he doesn’t…

238
 BREAKING: Kim Jong Un Accepts
President Trump’s Invitation To Visit US, Says KCNA
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 6:12 Pm

Now this…
BREAKING NEWS.
Kim Jong Un accepted Trump’s
North Korea’s Kim Jong Un accepted invitation to visit the US.
President Trump’s invitation to visit the
US, says KCNA

President Trump arrived in Singapore

over the weekend for a historical, high
stakes meeting with North Korea’s Kim
Jong Un in an effort to negotiate the de-
nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

The President met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un Kim also invited Trump to visit North
in Singapore Tuesday for historic peace talks. Korea during the meeting.

In a press conference following his meeting with Jong Un,

Trump explained the human rights record regarding North
Korea was discussed during the meeting, but the primary
goal was to negotiate denuclearization.

Hate-filled liberals and NeverTrumpers downplayed the

historic meeting.

Ben Shapiro told Fox & Friends,

“The president’s praise for the dictator of

North Korea was disquieting… The paper
that was signed yesterday was weak.”

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough railed against the President

Tuesday morning, claiming the Commander-in-Chief is
“sick” for not publicly condemning North Korea’s human
right’s record during the summit and repudiating the
Communist regime’s treatment of Warmbier.

239
 Story developing…

240
 In HUGE Win For Trump, Xi Jinping Pulls
Missiles From South China Sea Leading Up To
Successful North Korea Summit
By Wohl Jacob
June 12, 2018, 6:43 Pm
China’s activities in the South China Sea have proven to
be one of the most contentious geopolitical issues of the
Trump Presidency. Leading up to a successful summit in
Singapore between President Trump and North Korean
leader Chairman Kim Jong Un, new data released by
Israeli Private Intelligence Firm ImageSat shows that
China removed anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles from
Woody Island, in the South China Sea last week.
Satellite Image of Woody Island, via Google Earth
Woody Island, also referred to as Yongxiang Island, is the
largest of the Paracel Islands claimed by China in the
.
241
South China Sea. In recent years, China has taken major
steps to heavily fortify the island, building runways for
military aircraft and installing anti-ship and anti-aircraft
missiles, much to the dismay of the United States and our
Asia-Pacific allies. The unusual and sudden move to
remove the missiles from the South China Sea, one of the
most critical stretches of ocean in the world, is widely seen
by policy experts as a nod of approval to President Trump,
leading up to a successful Summit with Kim Jong Un in
Singapore on Tuesday.
Amid a cancellation of joint US-South Korea military
drills near the Korean Peninsula and a decrease of tensions
with North Korea, much of America’s attention is likely to
be turned to the South China Sea, as President Trump
pursues a foreign policy that considers both military force
and economics in every foreign affair.
According to a 2015 Department of Defense estimate, $5.3
Trillion worth of goods move through the South China Sea
every year. Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense James
“Mad-Dog” Mattis accused China of “intimidation and
coercion” in the South China Sea, and vowed that America
will “compete vigorously” in the area.
The removal of missiles from the South China Sea marks a
major victory for President Trump, who has long been
seeking to completely demilitarize the critical trade route.
Editor’s note: An earlier version of this article stated Xi
Jinping removed missiles from South China Sea after the
Trump-Kim Summit in Singapore. A correction was made
noting the satellite imagery from Israeli private intel firm
ImageSat is dated June 3rd, therefore the missiles were
removed shortly before the Singapore Summit. This is still
seen as a nod to President Trump’s efforts in the region.
 BREAKING: Andrew McCabe Sues FBI, Justice
Department And Inspector General Over His Firing
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 7:25 Pm
Former Deputy Director of the FBI,
Andrew McCabe filed a lawsuit against
the DOJ, Inspector General and FBI
Tuesday over his firing.
The much-anticipated Inspector
General’s report on the FBI’s
(mis)handling of Hillary Clinton’s email
investigation will be released to the
public on June 14th.
Fox News reported:
Lawyers representing former FBI Deputy
Director Andrew McCabe filed a suit
against the Justice Department and FBI on
Tuesday, alleging that they wouldn’t give
up files connected to his ouster.
McCabe’s lawyers claimed that the Justice
Department has denied their client access
to the sought-after information out of
concern that the documents could be later
used against them, the lawsuit said. The
suit also named the office of the DOJ
inspector general.
.
242
“We don’t create or adjudicate under secret
law or procedure,” David Snyder, one of
McCabe’s lawyers, said in an email to The
Associated Press.
McCabe’s lawyers say in the complaint that they want the
records as they “seek to vindicate Mr. McCabe’s rights and
restore his good name,” and as they weigh whether to take
more legal action over a firing they contend was improper.
On March 16th, Andrew McCabe was fired by Attorney
General Jeff Sessions just hours before he was set to retire
after serving over two decades in the FBI.
Inspector General Horowitz released a scathing report on
McCabe in mid-April accusing him of lying under oath
several times.
Andrew McCabe was subsequently criminally referred to
the US Attorney’s office in DC by the Office of Inspector
General.
In a letter sent to Chairman Grassley
last Monday, Andrew McCabe’s attorney
Michael Bromwich requested the Senate
Judiciary Committee grant the former
FBI official immunity from prosecution
in exchange for testifying at next week’s
Congressional hearing on the FBI’s
handling of the Clinton investigation.
McCabe’s lawyer, Michael Bromwich also stated in the
letter they requested an investigation into the DOJ’s source
of leaks about the former FBI official’s criminal referral to
the US Attorney’s office.
This story is developing…
 AWOL AG Jeff Sessions: “I’m Confident” Deputy AG
Rosenstein Did Not Threaten Members Of Congress
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 8:00 Pm

Attorney General Jeff Sessions joined
Tucker Carlson to discuss the shocking
revelation today that Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein threatened
members of Congress.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened to
subpoena emails, phone records and other documents of
Republican lawmakers on the House Intel Committee back
in January, confirming previous reports.
Tucker Carlson: Did the Deputy Attorney General
threaten to subpoena the email or phone records of the
members of the House Intel Committee?
Jeff Sessions: All I can say is Chris Wray and the senior
ethics attorney and others and did not see it in that same
fashion.
Via Tucker Carlson Tonight:

On Tuesday night Jeff Sessions told Tucker Carlson that

he did not believe Rosenstein threatened Congress.

Jeff Sessions: well, I don’t know if they’ve confirmed that

exactly. In fact the FBI Director, the senior ethics attorney
for the Department of Justice who was in the room said
that is a mischaracterization of really of what occurred…
We understand in this department that we are accountable
to the president and are accountable to Congress.

243
 Trump Haters TRIGGERED By
POTUS Success: Losers And Underachievers Attack
Posted On June 12, 2018
(National Sentinel) Typical: If President Donald Trump
woke up tomorrow and cured all forms of cancer, someone
somewhere would find something to complain about.
Some of that criticism, no doubt, would also come from
people he saved — because even though they would be
cancer-free, they’d still be afflicted by Trump
Derangement Syndrome.
What POTUS Trump did overnight in signing a four-point
denuclearization agreement with North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un was nothing short of historic.
The agreement, which was no doubt worked out well in
advance or Trump wouldn’t have shown up in the first
place — that’s how diplomatic tradecraft works — is clear
in what it aims to accomplish, as we reported earlier:
1. The United States and the DPRK commit to establish
new U.S.–DPRK relations in accordance with the
desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace
and prosperity.
2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to
build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean
Peninsula.
3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration,
the DPRK commits to work toward complete
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering
POW/MIA remains, including the immediate
repatriation of those already identified.
Note the highlighted portion of the agreement.
That’s the historic part.
Just a year ago, POTUS Trump and Kim were trading
barbs and insults. Trump was very clearly and very
straightforwardly threatening to annihilate North Korea,
much to the chagrin of South Korea, China, and Russia.
At that time he was being criticized by the haters as a
“madman,” an “idiot” and a “dolt” who was going to fulfill
their worst nightmares and bring about nuclear holocaust.
244
What he brought about instead
was peace.
Trump’s refusal to back down was what got Kim’s
attention and the attention of his main benefactor —
Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump’s steadfastness led to
this historic agreement.
But since Obama couldn’t do it — or Bush
43 or Bush 41 or Clinton or anyone else in
the Washington, D.C. ‘club’ — then the
only thing left for the phony ‘experts’ and
diplomats and pundits is to criticize the
president who did get it done.
That’s all they’ve got.
“The president’s praise for the dictator of
North Korea was disquieting… The paper
that was signed yesterday was weak,”
chided #nevertrump “conservative” Ben
Shapiro — who, as a Harvard law grad
makes a lousy national security and foreign
policy expert.
Hey Ben, you know who else American presidents have
sat down with to avoid nuclear or total war? FDR sat down
with gulag master and mass murder Josef Stalin to end
World War II. Ronald Reagan sat down with the Soviet
leader Mikhail Gorbechev to end the Cold War.
Great presidents do such things when they
are in the interests of the American people.
We aren’t negotiating with Kim to tell him
how to run his country; we’re negotiating to
get rid of a potent nuclear threat. How ’bout
you put your thinking cap on next time
before you speak?
Over at MSNBC, meanwhile, the perpetually unhinged
morning host Joe Scarborough made the same dumb
argument as Shapiro. And for extra measure, he had on an
“expert” guest who has failed to accomplish anything
nearly as substantial in his career to tell us all how dumb
Trump is.
Scarborough railed against the President Tuesday morning,
claiming POTUS was “sick” for not publicly condemning
North Korea’s human right’s record during the summit and
repudiating the Communist regime’s treatment of Otto
Warmbier.
“I thought it was tortured logic at best to
say that the North Koreans murder of Otto
Warmbier was a time of reflection for them
– that’s just not true at all. I personally think
it’s sick for him to suggest such a thing
about the most murderous regime, one of
the most murderous regimes on the face of
the earth,” Scarborough whined.
What matters are results. And Trump is the one who has
delivered on this issue.
Earlier, Obama’s failed national security adviser Susan
Rice, who may have criminally unmasked American
citizens tied to Trump’s 2016 campaign, claimed that
Obama could have done this if only Kim had decided at
that time he was ready to deal.
Really?
Kim was only “ready to deal” after Trump — using
credible threats of force and maximum sanctions — forced
him to become “ready.”

Meanwhile, presidential historian Jon Meacham dished on

Obama couldn’t even get the Iranians to sign his ‘nuclear
Trump’s mental capacity.
deal.

“Complexity is not Donald Trump’s friend, obviously, and

Trump Derangement Syndrome is a sad thing to see. But it
never has been and isn’t here,” he said. “Suddenly that
so very often causes otherwise rational people to think and
personal characteristic – his need to simplify everything,
say very irrational things.
to make a deal out of it in which he is a protagonist and the
person across the table is a co-star to some extent, is now
intersecting with the life of nations.” We’ll see if the deal Trump and Kim made holds up. We
certainly hope it does, though there are sickos on the Left
who are hoping it doesn’t.
Har, har, Jon. Good one!
Time will tell. What is very true and obvious, however, is
The fact is — and this is really all that matters — Trump
that no president before Trump has ever gotten this close
is the one who got this deal done. Period.
to making this kind of a deal. The president deserves credit
and plaudits for it, regardless what the hand-wringing,
It doesn’t matter what any of these jerks really think. It whining, unaccomplished, professional punditry class says.
doesn’t matter what any of these jerks really say.

245
 President Trump On Kim Jong-Un:
He’s A Strong Guy, Very Good Personality, Funny, Smart,
Very Strategic (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 12, 2018, 9:14 Pm

President Trump on Kim Jong-Un: He’s

a Strong Guy, Very Good Personality, Via Hannity:
Funny, Smart, Very Strategic–

President Trump held an interview with Sean Hannity

following his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-
Un.

President Trump had this to say about Little Rocket Man.

President Trump:

He’s a strong guy. People were saying,

‘What’s he like?’ He’s got a very good
personality. He’s funny. He’s very, very
smart. He’s a great negotiator. And he’s a
very strategic kind of a guy.
.

246
 NBC Whines And Frets About
North Korea Summit, But Defends Iran’s Deal
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 12, 2018 9:39 PM EDT

asserted that any suggestion from Trump that Iran was a

threat in some way was nothing but ploys. She rolled her
eyes at Trump trusting Kim but on a trip to Cuba last year,
she met some of their intelligence officials and bought
into their claims of aiding U.S. intelligence officials, yet
she never said if she confirmed it.

The latest liberal media criticism of what came out of the

meeting was how Trump agreed to call off military
exercises with South Korea.

“But apparently no one told the South

President Trump made history Tuesday as he met face-to- Koreans President Trump promised
face with North Korean despot Kim Jong-un for the first chairman Kim he'd scrap them,” chided
time and signed an agreement to move towards peace and NBC foreign correspondent Richard Engel.
denuclearization, a goal only the liberal media would find “American forces in South Korea said
something to whine about. they, too, received ‘no updated
guidance on execution or cessation of
While broadcast networks ABC and CBS were skeptical training exercises.’”
about how the agreement would turn out (a legitimate
concern considering North Korea’s history of reneging on
such deals), NBC Nightly News took a noticeably harsher
tone and railed against President Trump. This decrying of
Trump’s agreement comes after NBC has gone to bat time
and time again for the radical Islamic regime of Iran and
against our President.

“So after all the pomp and circumstance,

what comes next? How does the U.S.
hold North Korea to its commitment to
denuclearize after its broken nuclear
promises in the past,” anchor Lester Holt
condescendingly wondered ahead of a But how could they have been made aware? The
report by chief foreign affairs announcement was made shortly after they stepped out of
correspondent Andrea Mitchell. the meeting.

Mitchell began her report by scoffing at claims by
President Trump that he trusted Kim and his intentions.
“How can the U.S. be sure? A key
missing ingredient, no requirement that
Kim Jong-un disclose how many
weapons he has or where they are
hidden,” she huffed.
This pessimism was coming from the same NBC reporter
who had apparently made it a personal mission to defend
President Obama’s Iran nuclear deal. Mitchell once
247
“Cancelling these war games is seen
here as a major concession to North
Korea,” Engel continued to huff.
Of course, there was no mention of how such an exercise
nearly led to the summit being derailed altogether.
Then came the allusions to President Trump not caring
about Kim Jong-un’s and North Korea’s abysmal human
right record.
 “One issue that did not receive much
discussion during this summit was the
brutal reality of life in North Korea …
NBC's Hallie Jackson has more on what
wasn't said at this historic face-to-face,”
announced Holt.
The only problem was that they had a clip of Trump saying
they talked about it.
Jackson began her report by making it seem like Trump
didn’t know what he talking about (click “expand” to
read):
JACKSON: In Singapore, smiles and a stroll from Kim
Jong-un but back home, a U.N. report paints a much more
grim picture. One of extermination, murder, enslavement,
torture, imprisonment, rape, crimes against humanity.
DONALD TRUMP: His country does love him. His
people, you see the fervor. They have a great fervor.
JACKSON: But what he calls “fervor,” the U.N. calls
indoctrination. Another in a long and disturbing list of
human rights abuses Kim's accused of.
TRUMP: It was discussed. It was discussed relatively
briefly compared to denuclearization. That's where we
started and ended.
But on Capitol Hill, disappointment today that human
rights wasn't more of a focus,” she continued. “There's
been a lot left off the table. There are a lot of scant details.
That's why this amounts to nothing more, at this point,
than a photo-op,” New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory
Booker bemoaned in a clip.
It’s hypocritical that they would slam Trump for allegedly
not bringing up North Korea’s human rights record in their
very first meeting when Iran’s human rights record didn’t
appear to be a concern in Obama’s nuclear deal. In fact,
Iran’s record didn’t appear to be a concern for NBC when
they sympathized with Iranian President Hassan
Rouhani against our President. And they never
reported on-air how Obama ‘sabotaged’ the U.S.’s anti-
terror efforts to get Iran to sign the deal.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below:
NBC Nightly News
June 12, 2018
7:04:51 PM Eastern [6 minutes 24 seconds]
LESTER HOLT: So after all the pomp and circumstance, what
comes next? How does the U.S. hold North Korea to its
commitment to denuclearize after its broken nuclear promises in
248
the past? NBC News chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea
Mitchell has more on the big questions.
[Cuts to video]
ANDREA MITCHELL: The ink now dry with great fanfare. Kim
Jong-un committing to the complete denuclearization of the
Korean peninsula. But will he deliver? The President suggesting
it comes down to trust.
(…)
MITCHELL: How can the U.S. be sure? A key missing ingredient,
no requirement that Kim Jong-un disclose how many weapons he
has or where they are hidden.
(…)
MITCHELL: What else is missing from the summit document? No
definition of denuclearization, no details on verification. Tonight,
lawmakers, even some Republicans, say it's too vague.
(…)
MITCHELL: Still, the President says this is just a beginning. That
he has accomplished something no other president could, a
meeting with a North Korean leader. But did he get enough in
return?
(…)
HOLT: As the events unfolded here in Singapore, South Korea
was looking on with high stakes in the outcome. And when
President Trump announced he's halting military exercises with
them, it seems he not only surprised the South Koreans but U.S.
forces in the region, too. NBC News chief foreign correspondent
Richard Engel is in Seoul and has reaction for us tonight.
[Cuts to video]
RICHARD ENGEL: Across South Korea today, hope this historic
handshake means peace is finally in the air. President Moon Jae-
in, who met Kim Jong-un to help organize this summit, said he
was so excited he couldn't sleep last night. But now, focus here
is turning to that curveball. President Trump saying while U.S.
Troops would remain in South Korea, no more war games.
(…)
ENGEL: But apparently no one told the South Koreans President
Trump promised chairman Kim he'd scrap them. A South Korean
military official told NBC News, “we need to find out the exact
meaning or intention behind his comments.” American forces in
South Korea said they, too, received “no updated guidance on
execution or cessation of training exercises.”
[Cuts back to live]
Cancelling these war games is seen here as a major concession
to North Korea. And this morning, North Korean media's
reporting that Kim Jong-un demanded it and President Trump
complied. Lester?
(...)
HOLT: One issue that did not receive much discussion during
this summit was the brutal reality of life in North Korea. Kim Jong-
un's regime has been accused of appalling human rights
violations against his own people as well as the mistreatment of
American prisoners. NBC's Hallie Jackson has more on what
wasn't said at this historic face-to-face.
[Cuts to video]
HALLIE JACKSON: In Singapore, smiles and a stroll from Kim
Jong-un but back home, a U.N. report paints a much more grim
picture. One of extermination, murder, enslavement, torture,
imprisonment, rape, crimes against humanity.
DONALD TRUMP: His country does love him. His people, you
see the fervor. They have a great fervor.
JACKSON: But what he calls “fervor,” the U.N. calls
indoctrination. Another in a long and disturbing list of human
rights abuses Kim's accused of.
TRUMP: It was discussed. It was discussed relatively briefly
compared to denuclearization. That's where we started and
ended.
249
JACKSON: President Trump didn't dwell on the negative, instead
repeatedly pointing to the positive.
(…)
JACKSON: Kim Jong-un, as you know, has killed family
members, has starved his own people, is responsible for the
death of Otto Warmbier. Why are you so comfortable calling him
very talented?
(…)
JACKSON: But on Capitol Hill, disappointment today that human
rights wasn't more of a focus.
CORY BOOKER: There's been a lot left off the table. There are a
lot of scant details. That's why this amounts to nothing more, at
this point, than a photo-op.
[Cuts back to live]
JACKSON: But there are other lawmakers like Senator Bob
Corker, for example, who are instead of picking apart what wasn't
said, focus on what was on denuclearization. The President
himself suggested he would bring up these human rights abuses
with Kim Jong-un down the road, but, of course, Lester, that may
not be a conversation Kim wants to have.
(…)
 Trump’s 2020 Campaign Chair Brad Parscale Drops A
MOAB On Jim Acosta After Their Twitter War Escalates
By Cristina Laila
June 12, 2018, 9:37 Pm

Whiny baby Jim Acosta responded to Parscale later on

Tuesday.
Whiny baby Jim Acosta; Trump 2020 Campaign Chair Brad Parscale
Acosta tweeted: Dear Brad.. dictatorships take away press
President Trump made history on Tuesday. The US credentials. Not democracies.
president somehow brought the tyrant of North Korea to
the table to sign the most important nuclear agreement in
the last 70 years for the Korean people.

Months of hard work and diplomacy reached a climax on

Tuesday. The moment will go down in history. Then
CNN’s Jim Acosta, the darling of the disruptive left,
started blurting out questions at the president whenever the
two leaders came into view.

Parscale responded by dropping a MOAB on Jim Acosta.

At one point Trump and Kim Jong Un paused on the
balcony during their talks.
Brad Parscale tweeted: Dear Jim. It isn’t about the
constitution. It’s about respect. He won the presidency not
Jim Acosta started blurting out questions whenever the two
you. Go win it yourself if you need it all about you.
leaders came stepped out of their meetings — then Acosta
was caught in a hot mic moment.

President Trump’s 2020 Campaign Manager Brad

Parscale, who stands at 6’8″, slammed Jim Acosta Tuesday
morning calling for his press credentials to be immediately
suspended after his latest disgraceful stunt.

Parscale tweeted: Jim @Acosta should immediately have

his press credentials suspended. He is an absolute disgrace!
@realDonaldTrump

250
 The Democrats Out-Right
The Right On North Korean Summit
By Ajamu Baraka
June 12, 2018
Photo by Senate Democrats | CC BY 2.0
If more proof was needed to persuade anyone that the
Democrats are indeed a war party, it was provided when
Senator Chuck Schumer and other Democrat leaders in the
Senate engaged in a cynical stunt to stake out a position to
the right of John Bolton on the summit between Trump
and Kim Jong Un.
The Democrats asserted that the planned summit could
only be judged successful if the North Koreans agreed to
dismantle and remove all their nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons, end all production and enrichment of
uranium, dismantle its nuclear weapons infrastructure, and
suspend ballistic missile tests.
Those demands would constitute an unconditional
surrender on the part of the North Korean leadership and
will not happen, and the Democrats know it.
But as problematic as those demands are, here is the real
problem that again demonstrates the bi-partisan
commitment to war that has been at the center of U.S.
imperial policies: If these are the outcomes that must be
achieved for the meeting to be judged a success, not only
does it raise the bar beyond the level any serious person
believes possible, it gives the Trump administration the
ideological cover to move toward war. The inevitable
failure to force the North Koreans to surrender essentially
forecloses all other options other than military conflict.
This is a reckless and cynical game that provides more
proof that neither party has the maturity and foresight to
lead.
251
Both capitalist parties support the use and deployment of
militarism, repression and war, but somehow – even
though the historic record reveals the opposite – the
Democratic party has managed to be perceived as less
likely to support the war agenda than Republicans. That
perception must be challenged directly.
The Democrats have had a long and sordid history
connected to North Korea, and every other imperialist war
that the U.S. has waged since the end of the Second World
War. It was the policies of Democrat president Truman
that divided the Korean peninsula and led to the brutal
colonial war waged by U.S. forces. Conflict with Korea
was valuable for Truman and his party advisors who were
committed to re-militarizing the U.S. economy, and they
needed the justification that the Korean war gave them.
Truman tripled the military budget and established the
framework for the network of U.S foreign bases that would
eventually cover the world over the next few decades.
The bipartisan commitment to full spectrum dominance
continues with no real opposition from the Democratic
party-connected “resistance.” Even the Poor Peoples’
Campaign (PPC) that was launched in May and purports to
be an independent moral movement still dances around the
issue of naming the parties and interests responsible for the
“moral failures” of the U.S.
On the other hand, the Revolutionary Action Committee,
the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, the
student- and youth-led anti-war movement and eventually
Dr. King clearly identified the bi-partisan commitment to
the Vietnam war. What Dr. King and the activists in the
1960s understood was that in order to be politically and
morally consistent, it was necessary to name the culprits
and identify the concrete geopolitical and economic
interests driving the issue of war and militarism.
Appeals to morality as an element for popular mobilization
against war can be useful. But such appeals have little
more impact than an online petition if they substitute
vague platitudes for substance and specificity.
So it was with the PPC’s week of actions against war. Just
a few days before the week began, a vote took place in the
House of Representatives to support yet another increase
to the military budget. In a vote of 351 to 66, the House of
Representatives authorized a significant hike to an
incredible $717 billion a year.
And then just a few days after the PPC’s week of action on
militarism and war, the Democrats delivered their reckless
and opportunistic ultimatum to the Trump administration
on North Korea that could very conceivably lead to
another illegal and immoral U.S. war.
Not calling the Democrats out on their warmongering is
itself immoral.
It is also quite clear that vague moral appeals are not
enough to delineate the interests of the capitalist elites and
their commitment to war as oppositional to those of
working people and the poor, who in the U.S. serve the
moneyed interests as enlisted cannon fodder.
The positions staked out by the leadership of the
Democratic party just confirmed what was already
commonly understood as the hegemonic positions among
the majority in the foreign policy establishment.
.
252
Objectively, there was never much ideological space
between the right-wing policies of Dick Cheney or John
Bolton and the neoliberal right-wing policies of
Democratic party policy-makers. The differences were
always merely tactical and not strategic in the sense that
they all want the North Koreans to be supplicants.
Unfortunately, the general public is the only sector
confused about the intentions and interests of elitist policy-
makers, especially those elements of the public
conditioned to believe that the Democratic party is less
belligerent and less committed to militarism than the
Republicans.
The fact is that the Democratic party establishment is also
firmly entrenched on the right. Defeating the bi-partisan
right must be the task for ourselves and for the world.
That is why the peace, anti-war and anti-imperialist forces
must do the work to clear up that confusion. The
movement must declare without equivocation the position
of the Black Alliance for Peace: Not one drop of blood
from the working class and poor to defend the interests of
the capitalist oligarchy.
 VIDEO: Tucker Carlson GOES OFF On Former DNC
Deputy Press Secretary, Calls Him ‘Stupid Person’
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 12, 2018, 11:39 Pm

person,” and ultimately ended up pulling the plug on the

interview.

“It’s hilarious that that solution

comports exactly with your political
goal, which is to create more
Democratic voters,” Carlson said in
response to Aristimuno stating that
illegal immigrants without criminal
records should be legalized.
“So your answer and many Republicans’
Former DNC Deputy Press Secretary Jose Aristimuno got answer is to deport the 14 million illegal
chewed out by Fox News host Tucker Carlson over his immigrants in the country,” Aristimuno
advocacy for illegal immigrants. responded.

At this point, the situation became extremely heated as

Aristimuno continued to push for amnesty.

“This is just another stupid political talking

point from a stupid person… I don’t have
time for conversations with people who
don’t know what they are talking about and
haven’t thought it through and want to
come on and spew more talking points and
call anyone who disagrees, a racist. Which
is what you did in the very first sentence of
this segment. Thank you. You are
pathetic.”
Carlson was so annoyed with Aristimuno that he accused
him of lying for political gain, called him a “ridiculous
.

253
 Boot: Trump Is An ‘Arsonist’
Putting Out His North Korea Fire
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 13, 2018 12:57 AM EDT
From almost the very beginning, President Trump played
down expectations for the North Korea summit, even
suggesting it may not even happen. But now that the
President was walking away with a signed commitment,
which he acknowledged might fall through, liberal news
outlets were questioning why they even had the summit at
all. On Tuesday’s edition on CNN Tonight, author Max
Boot argued Trump shouldn’t really get any credit because
he was putting out the fire he started.
At the top of the program, the majority anti-Trump panel
couldn’t figure out why the two counties needed to meet to
discuss anything.
“Let's … talk about what Scott
[Jennings] said, at least we're off the
brink of a nuclear war. Wasn't it the
President's rhetoric in the first place
that put us in that,” wondered host Don
Lemon. “I'm wondering did you need to
have this summit in order to get what
these two people got?”
Of course, Boot responded by suggesting most of the
blame for the rhetorical threats and insults that flew around
last year were mostly Trump’s fault.
“[A] lot of the reason we were on the
brink of nuclear war last year (…) [was]
because of the reckless and
irresponsible rhetoric from Donald
Trump ratcheting up the tensions,” he
asserted.
254
“And so now this is kind of the arsonist
getting credit for putting out the fire,” he
declared.
To make sure he didn’t look completely foolish, Boot did
note that North Korea was making some sort of
provocative display with their nuclear weapons towards
the U.S. at the time. He also completely overlooked how
this got started then North Korea killed American student
Otto Warmbier.
“But what's striking to me about the
summit is how little Donald Trump got
in return for legitimating Kim Jong-un
on the world stage,” Boot continued to
whine. “[F]or describing Kim Jong-un as
this very talented, smart, funny guy. I
mean, it sounded like, you know, Donald
Trump wanted to invite Kim to the
prom.”
As if time had not progressed and other developments had
not occurred, Lemon turned to CNN’s chief political
correspondent, Dana Bash to chastise the “double
standard” where “Fox News” and “conservatives
slammed Obama for his willingness to talk to
dictators.” He proceeded to show her a montage of clips
showing Fox News folks outraged.
“So, if you open the dictionary to the
word hypocrisy does that video play,” he
mocked. “Loudly and proudly that video
plays. There’s no question about it,” she
proclaimed. Bash then boasted about how
she argued: “[T]hat if Donald Trump were
a Democrat, the impeachment articles
would be written right now if the
 Republicans were in charge doing the
same thing.”
But it’s not “the same thing.” The situation was nowhere
near the same as 10-years-ago. When Obama was
president, North Korea didn’t have the ability to have a
nuclear missile reach as far as Washington, D.C.
(according to some estimates). North Korea wasn’t
threatening to irradiate Guam with their weapons and we
weren’t drawing up plans for a ground war on the Korean
Peninsula. Time passes and situations change.
“I don't think we should fall to the trap of
saying the only alternatives are nuclear
war or the kind of diplomacy that
Donald Trump is conducting where he's
making a lot of unilateral concessions
and not getting a lot in return and kind
of fawning over this dictator,”
Boot bemoaned a short time later. But for all of his and
the liberal media opining about “unilateral concessions,”
the U.S. really hasn’t given up anything of substance.
They’ll complain that we “elevated” Kim and gave him
“legitimacy” but he arguably got that when he got D.C. in
range of his nukes. For all their outrage at the President,
their suggestions only leave Trump with the option to go to
war.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below:
CNN Tonight
June 12, 2018
10:06:38 PM Eastern
(…)
DON LEMON: Okay, Max, let’s just put—because I have other
dictators that he’s had nice words for. Let's put that on hold for a
second and talk about what Scott said, at least we're off the brink
of a nuclear war. Wasn't it the President's rhetoric in the first
place that put us in that? And all you have to do -- I'm wondering
did you need to have this summit in order to get what these two
people got? This short little letter that basically said—and this is a
key I don’t know if anyone else has noticed that it's number three,
the whole crux of this, it says: “Reaffirming the April 27, 2018
Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward
complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.” Will, that
was decided back in April, that's what they've been working for all
along. Do they need to do this, Max?
MAX BOOT: No. I mean, I think your exactly right, Don, a lot of
the reason we were on the brink of nuclear war last year—I mean
part of it to be sure was because of the North Korean nuclear
tests and their missile test, but also because of the reckless and
irresponsible rhetoric from Donald Trump ratcheting up the
255
tensions. And so now this is kind of the arsonist getting credit for
putting out the fire.
But what's striking to me about the summit is how little Donald
Trump got in return for legitimating Kim Jong-un on the world
stage. For treating this leader of this two-bit dictatorship as the
equal of the president of the United States; for suspending
U.S./South Korean joint military exercises, which is a huge
concession to the North in describing those exercises as
provocative war games, which is adopting the language of
Northern propaganda; for describing Kim Jong-un as this very
talent, smart, funny guy. I mean, it sounded like, you know,
Donald Trump wanted to invite Kim to the prom.
And in return for all of that, what does he get? Nothing except the
empty blather that you quoted about working towards the
complete denuclearization and Korean peninsula, which is what
the North Koreans have been saying since 1992. I mean, I could
say I'm working toward beating Roger Federer at Wimbledon,
that doesn’t mean it’s ever going to happen.
(…)
LEMON: Having set that up, Dana, this is possibly a double
standard whether you look at what Fox News and how
conservatives slammed Obama for his willingness to talk to
dictators. Watch this.
(…)
LEMON: So, if you open the dictionary to the word hypocrisy
does that video play, Dana?
DANA BASH: Loudly and proudly that video plays. There’s no
question about it. I said it earlier today that if Donald Trump were
a Democrat, the impeachment articles would be written right now
if the Republicans were in charge doing the same thing.
Having said that, that wouldn’t make it right because there is,
rightly so, a bipartisan feeling and sentiment that having a
diplomatic conversation is the right way to go. Now, as Max was
saying, whether or not he went way over his skies is a different
conversation. You have people like Marco Rubio today saying
that he is appalled at the kind of language Donald Trump used
about this dictator given the way he tortures and starves his
people. He kills his own family members, executes them when
they don't do what he wants. And he's following in the steps of
his father and grandfather. But having said that, this is, you know,
many people say—and not just many people say, I sound like the
President now (Lemon laughs) – this is flatly better than the
alternative, which is a horrendous war.
(…)
BOOT: I don't think we should fall to the trap of saying the only
alternatives are nuclear war or the kind of diplomacy that Donald
Trump is conducting where he's making a lot of unilateral
concessions and not getting a lot in return and kind of fawning
over this dictator. I'm all in favor of engaging in North Korea but I
think you need to do it firmly. I don't think you allow the North
Korean dictator a meeting with the U.S. president without getting
some concessions upfront. And we’re just not seeing—
SCOTT JENNINGS: There is a third way. There is a third way.
We can keep doing what we were doing and that was not
working. And I think the President has dealt with Kim firmly. The
sanctions were firm, the threat of military force was firm.
LEMON: Scott, I think you’re right. I think, listen. I think your right
but answer this for me, Scott. We could continue to do what we
(…)
256
were doing, okay fine. You said that didn't work, all right I'll grant
you that. But when that wasn't working the former president was
being criticized by your party for wanting to talk to Kim Jong-un
and wanting to talk to dictators. How is that not hypocrisy? What
is different now? Please explain that to me.
JENNINGS: I'll give you one point about Obama that
Republicans always believed, and that is they never believed he
would show the resolve necessary in conversations with
dictators. And he proved it. He drew a red line on Syria for
instance.
 Mueller Scrambles To Limit Evidence
After Indicted Russians Actually Show Up In Court
By Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/13/2018 - 05:34
Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit
pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he
indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016
U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective
order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence
to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC,
one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals.
The indictment accuses the firm of
producing propaganda, pretending to be
U.S. activists online and posting
political content on social media in
order to sow discord among American
voters.
The special counsel's office argues that the risk of the
evidence leaking or falling into the hands of foreign
intelligence services, especially Russia, would assist the
Kremlin's active "interference operations" against the
United States.
“The substance of the government’s
evidence identifies uncharged individuals
and entities that the government believes
are continuing to engage in interference
operations like those charged in the
present indictment,” prosecutors wrote.
Improper disclosure would tip foreign
intelligence services about how the U.S.
operates, which would “allow foreign
actors to learn of those techniques and
adjust their conduct, thus undermining
ongoing and future national security
operations,” according to the filing.
257
The evidence includes thousands of documents involving
U.S. residents not charged with crimes who prosecutors
say were unwittingly recruited by Russian defendants and
co-conspirators to engage in political activity in the U.S.,
prosecutors wrote. -Bloomberg
Mueller also accused Concord of "knowingly and
intentionally" conspiring to interfere with the election by
using social media to disparage Hillary Clinton and
support Donald Trump.
And Concord Management decided to
fight it...
As Powerline notes,
Mueller probably didn't see that
coming –
and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a
PR stunt to bolster the Russian interference narrative.
I don’t think anyone (including Mueller)
anticipated that any of the defendants
would appear in court to defend against
the charges.
Rather, the Mueller prosecutors seem to have obtained the
indictment to serve a public relations purpose, laying out
the case for interference as understood by the government
and lending a veneer of respectability to the Mueller
Switch Project.
One of the Russian corporate defendants nevertheless hired
counsel to contest the charges.
In April two Washington-area attorneys
— Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly of the
Reed Smith firm — filed appearances in
court on behalf of Concord Management
and Consulting.
Josh Gerstein covered that turn of events for Politico here.
-Powerline Blog
Politico's Gerstein notes that by defending against the In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S.
charges, District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich
offered no explanation for her decision
“Concord could force prosecutors to to deny a request prosecutors made
turn over discovery about how the case Friday to put off the scheduled
was assembled as well as evidence that Wednesday arraignment for Concord
might undermine the prosecution’s Management and Consulting, one of the
theories.” three firms charged in the case. -Politico

In a mad scramble to put the brakes on the case, In other words, Mueller was denied the opportunity to kick
the can down the road, forcing him to produce the
requested evidence or withdraw the indictment,
Mueller's team tried to delay the trial -
potentially jeopardizing the PR aspect of the entire "Trump
saying that Concord never formally
collusion" probe.
accepted the court summons related to
the case,
And now Mueller is pointing to Russian
wrapping themselves in a "cloud of confusion" "interference operations" in a last-ditch
as Powerline puts it. effort.

Of note, Facebook VP of advertising, Rob Goldman,

“Until the Court has an opportunity to
tossed a major hand grenade in the "pro-Trump" Russian
determine if Concord was properly served,
meddling narrative in February when he fired off a series
it would be inadvisable to conduct an initial
of tweets the day of the Russian indictments.
appearance and arraignment at which
important rights will be communicated and
a plea entertained.” Most notably, Goldman pointed out that
the majority of advertising purchased by
The Judge, Dabney Friedrich - a Trump appointee, Russians on Facebook occurred
after the election, were hardly pro-
Trump,
didn't buy it - denying Mueller a delay
in the high-profile trial.
and they was designed to "sow discord and divide
The Russians hit back - filing Americans", something which Americans have been quite
a response to let the court know adept at doing on their own ever since the Fed decided to
that “[Concord] voluntarily appeared unleash a record class, wealth, income divide by keeping
through counsel as provided for in [the capital markets artificially afloat at any cost.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure],
and further intends to enter a plea of not
guilty. [Concord] has not sought a limited
appearance nor has it moved to quash the
summons. As such, the briefing sought
by the Special Counsel’s motion is
pettifoggery.”
And the Judge agreed...
A federal judge has rejected special
counsel Robert Mueller’s request to
delay the first court hearing in a criminal
case charging three Russian companies
and 13 Russian citizens with using social
media and other means to foment strife
among Americans in advance of the 2016
U.S. presidential election.

258
 Loudmouth #Nevertrumper Mark Sanford Loses
SC Primary To Pro-Trump Candidate –
Congratulations Katie Arrington!
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 8:01 Am

Trump tweeted Sanford would be better off in Argentina –

a hit on his former long distance affair.

Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) is a staunch

#NeverTrumper.
Sanford went on MSNBC to bash
President Trump over his sh*thole
comments.
Sanford lost on Tuesday in the GOP
primary.
Another #NeverTrumper bit the dust.

FOX News reported:

Incumbent Republican South Carolina Rep.

Sanford was expected to be a shoo-in
for releection.
But the bitter #NeverTrumper was
forced to start spending money to
smear his Republican opponent in the
final hours of his primary campaign.
Sanford ran against Pro-Trump
Republican state Rep. Katie Arrington in
the Republican primary.
President Trump tweeted out in support of Katie Arrington
on Tuesday.
Mark Sanford, a frequent Trump critic who
the president lambasted earlier in the day
as “nothing but trouble” and “very
unhelpful,” was ousted in Tuesday night’s
primary by state Rep. Katie Arrington.
On a key primary night with elections also
held in Maine, Virginia, Nevada and North
Dakota, the results in South Carolina were
an unmistakably positive referendum on
President Trump’s tenure.
Arrington’s shock win was also a dramatic
rebuke of Sanford’s heated “Never Trump”-
style rhetoric and scandal-pocked career. It
signaled that the president’s base in the
state remains solidly behind him ahead of
November’s midterm elections, despite
withering criticism from both inside and
outside the Republican party.
Vote for Katie Arrington.

259
 Career State Dept. Officer SMACKS DOWN
Critics Of POTUS Trump’s Summit With Kim:
‘STOP Watching MSM!’
Posted On June 13, 2018

(National Sentinel) All Wrong: President Donald Trump’s

summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un was
nothing short of historic. He has put both countries on a
path toward permanent peace and denuclearization of the
Korean peninsula.
A year ago everyone was worried we were headed to
nuclear war against North Korea. That includes the
pinheaded Washington Establishment commentariat who
claimed that Trump was going to prove their worst
fears correct.
But now that he’s brought both countries back from the
precipice of war, the very same pinheads are criticizing
every aspect of the deal.
Trump’s a dolt because he ‘gave away too much.’
He didn’t ‘bring up Kim’s abysmal human rights record.’
He didn’t get anything at all from the tyrant dictator.
All of that is “100 percent wrong,” according to 24-year As Zero Hedge noted further:
State Department veteran and geopolitics expert Peter Van
Buren. No, the South Korean’s were not “betrayed”
or “abandoned” as Vox , MSNBC, and
In an epic Twitter rant, he began with this chastisement of many others claim — the reality is
the Trump haters: opposite: the peace efforts are being led
If you’re keeping score at home, every by the South Koreans, as President
pundit and MSM head who claimed the Moon Jae-in’s own unambiguous words
summit would never happen, or Trump indicate, saying he was very happy with
would blow up, is now 100% and forever the meeting.
wrong. Still watching CNN????” “I offer my heartfelt congratulations and
But of course, that was just the beginning. welcome the success of the historic
North Korea-United States
Van Buren proceeded, step by step, to outline all the very summit,” Moon’s statement begins.
real progress Trump made — on behalf of all Americans
and North Koreans, including the haters in our country. The fact remains that 81% of South
Koreans supported the summit, and
“The idea that Trump “betrayed” South 88% supported the prior Kim-Moon
Korea is limited to the American MSM. summit. Moon also has an 86% approval
Here’s the president of South Korea’s own rating. 70% of Americans support the
positive statement about SIngapore,” he meeting.
wrote.
The pundits now claiming “betrayal” of
South Korea have no clue what they’re
talking about.
Van Buren continued:

260
 “Keep in mind it was the earlier failures in in every setting, including during the Cold
Korea by the former government officials War (and Obama in Cuba!) So just STFU,”
on TV today criticising the he wrote.
#TrumpKimSummit who made the summit
Never-Trump “conservative” Jonah Goldberg made the
necessary. They’re the last people anyone
same error.
should be listening to at this point.”

He next pushed back on claims that Trump handed Kim a

“propaganda coup.”
“So anyone please tell me what a
“propaganda coup” for Kim entails. Is he
running for something? Will his salary
increase, get more TV bookings? Party
with Beyonce? World leaders who hate him
will say, golly, what a nice guy? EXACTLY
what does “propaganda coup” mean?”

Stupid.
Then Van Buren addressed the lie that Trump ‘gave away
the store.’
“Concessions? Kim’s ongoing moratorium
on nuclear and ballistic missile testing, the
return of American prisoners, the closing of
a ballistic missile test site, and the shutting
down of nuclear test facility without opening
a new one,” he wrote.
The ‘coup’ came, as one ignorant observer noted, as a
result of the U.S. and North Korean flags standing
with equal prominence behind the two leaders — standard
operating procedure for diplomatic events, Van Buren
points out.

He also reminded everyone what the real deterrent to

North Korean aggression is — our own strategic assets that
aren’t even deployed on the continent.
“Reminder major US military exercises in
Korea have been suspended/postponed
before, as far back as Team Spirit in 1990s
and recently as January for the Olympics.
Can be restarted anytime. Not much of a
“concession.” Meanwhile, the actual
“How freaking stupid are you? Flags are deterrent remains offshore, planes & subs,”
displayed as a symbol of diplomacy, and he said.
the side-by-side style is used everywhere
261

In a separate op-ed for Reuters, Van Buren noted how Kim
has made concessions as well:
“It is easy to announce a morning-
after defeat for Trump: to criticize the
agreement as vague and lacking in specific
.
262
commitments regarding
denuclearization. But those critics ignore
Kim’s moratorium on nuclear and
ballistic missile testing, the return of
American prisoners, the closing of a
ballistic missile test site, and
the shutting down of a major nuclear
test facility without opening a new one.”
The fact is this summit was only a first step. Reports note
that Kim has accepted an invitation from Trump to visit
the White House, where more talks will surely take place.
This will be a process. The faux outrage and idiocy
demonstrated by the ‘experts’ on the Left-leaning networks
have no basis for their complaints or negativity.
“Trump hate” isn’t going to cut it.
 Thank You President Trump!
US Households On Food Stamps Drops
Below 20 Million
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 8:30 Am
Under Barack Obama one in five US
households, or twenty percent of US
households, were on food stamps in
2013.
The Obama administration paid recruiters to sign up
people on food stamps.
Breitbart.com reported:
At the same time, the Obama administration also pursued a
“partnership” with the Mexican government to “raise
awareness” about food stamps. The administration used a
Spanish soap opera format to push food stamps on illegal
immigrants and Spanish-speaking Americans.
.
263
But those days are over.
The number of US households on food
stamps dropped to below 20 million for
the first time in eight years!
Thank you President Trump!
The number of households on food stamps
has dipped below 20 million for the first
time in eight years, according to the latest
data released by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
The latest data from the USDA reveals that
the number of households on food stamps
in February 2018 dropped to 19,992,124—
the first time it fell below 20 million since
September 2010, when 19,979,385
households were enrolled in the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP).
The USDA notes that not only is the
number of households receiving food
stamps at a record low level, but the
number of people enrolled in food stamps
has also gone down. From January to
February of this year alone, overall food
stamp enrollment dropped from 40,640,170
to 40,032,131.
 The “Ugh!” Heard Round The World:
Mika Brzezinski On The Kim-Trump Summit
By Gary Leupp
June 13, 2018
Photo by The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia | CC BY 2.0
Morning Joe on MSNC, Tuesday morning.
Ugh, she says.
Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un just had a successful
Singapore summit resulting in a signed statement lifting
the specter of war from the Korean peninsula.
And MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski says Ugh. He’s a dictator!
Trump praised him for his “talent.” Ugh.
Can we trust the North Koreans? she asks her cable co-
host and paramour Joe Scarborough. Joe authoritatively
tells her no, explaining how the North Koreans have
always violated their agreements. This was a glorified
photo-op, he tells her.
Mika is glaring this morning. She thinks North Korea got a
lot more out of the agreement than the U.S. She and Joe
are focusing on Trump’s press conference comments about
North Korean beaches and the prospect of condo
construction. (He must be in it for the money, as usual.)
CNN’s house “presidential historian” Jon Meacham
reiterates authoritatively that Kim Jong Un is oppressive.
Like we didn’t know that yesterday. Like it’s relevant to
the issue of denuclearization. MSNBC is pouring cold
water over the summit, minimizing its significance.
Whose success do Joe and Mika so resent? I submit it’s not
Trump’s so much as the success of the Korean people in
264
rallying against Trump’s annihilation threats by concerted
(north/south) action. The summit was the product of a joint
effort by South Korean President Moon Jae In and Kim
Jung Un; the north’s proposal for a talk was submitted
through the south. The overwhelming majority of Koreans
are delighted by the result. The madman backed off.
Joe inveighs about Trump’s fondness for “murderous
dictators.” Putin. Erdogan. Duterte. Now Kim. Instead of
reflecting on the significance of this moment in the context
of Korea’s tragic history and the U.S. role in it, the
charming Joe-Mika duo exude resentment at a Trump
diplomatic success. They find in it further occasion to
dwell on Kim’s human rights record.
Trump has referred (accurately) to U.S. training activities
in South Korea as “provocative” and unnecessary and
stated at his press conference in Singapore that he would
end them. This is very good! MSNBC calls on Pentagon
correspondent Hans Nichols to comment; he says
Secretary of Defense Mattis never cleared Trump’s
remarks.
David Ignatius appears and interviews Sen. Chris Coons
(D-DE) demanding no lifting of sanctions until full
denuclearization.
MSNBC rather than rejoicing at an agreement establishing
diplomatic relations, mutual commitment to lasting peace,
negotiations towards complete denuclearization of the
peninsula and the return of remains of U.S. troops from the
north complains it’s “not a deal at all.” Yes, Eugene
Robinson just said that.
You fools! Do you so disparage the approximately 75
million Korean people and their aspirations for peace, that
you want to treat Singapore as some sort of scandal rather
than a very positive development?
Joe calls it a “shotgun summit” and compares it to heroic
Ronald Reagan’s confrontational approach to Gorbachev
30 years ago. Ignatius demands the fleshing out of details.
Negativity and cynicism prevail. Mika is 100% hostile.
“This is the risk one takes when Donald is alone at the
table,” she gripes. Meaning: he didn’t get all the
concessions demanded by the Democrats in their recent
letter to Trump.
Mika’s late dad (Zbigniew Brzezinski) famously proposed
to President Jimmy Carter that the U.S. “bleed the Soviets
in Afghanistan the way they bled us in Vietnam.” He
spearheaded the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan after
1978. He was an inveterate anticommunist, a war-
mongering Cold Warrior who rejoiced in the Roman
Catholic Church’s role in the collapse of the Soviet bloc.
Mika is a Democratic party shill, Joe a disillusioned
Republican who has never rocked the boat but just come
off as obnoxious. Neither of them has any intellectual
substance.
265
But they and their team like school marms lecture their
audience that North Korea is oppressive, that Kim kills his
relatives, that Trump hasn’t gotten anything concrete yet.
Keep worrying, people. Take no comfort in anything
Trump does. Roll your eyes like Mika does. Or like Joe
does. Think about it. Full diplomatic relations between
Washington and Pyongyang. Potential end to U.S. war
games in South Korea. Potential removal of (provocative)
U.S. troops. Security guarantees for the DPRK. Deepening
north-south economic ties and gradual reunification.
Ugh? Why ugh? Why ugh, Mika?
 Unreal! Lameduck Paul Ryan Reaches Agreement – Will
Allow Votes On Immigration And Amnesty Next Week
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 8:50 Am
It’s as if the 2016 election never
happened.
Speaker Paul Ryan will allow votes next
week on immigration including amnesty
for illegal immigrant Dreamers.
Speaker Paul Ryan promised to pass amnesty for illegals
in February.
Ryan also promised to pass amnesty back in September
2017.
President Trump promised Democrats
amnesty for up to 3 million illegals if
they would agree to build a border wall.
.
266
Democrats refused the deal.
**********
So now pro-amnesty Republicans are
determined to give Democrats what they
want anyway.
These politicians are working against
the American people.
The Washington Times reported:
House Republicans have reached a deal to
vote on two immigration bills next week,
Speaker Paul D. Ryan’s office said
Tuesday, setting the stage for a high-
stakes floor showdown over the fate of
millions of illegal immigrants.
House Republicans will hash out the
options at a closed-door meeting
Wednesday morning, said AshLee Strong,
Mr. Ryan’s spokeswoman.
The mere act of scheduling votes is
symbolically huge. It will be the first
time since Republicans retook control
of the chamber in 2010 that they have
put a major legalization bill on the floor.
But the fact that two bills will be put on the floor suggests
there is still no unanimity within the party on how far to go
on legalization of “Dreamers,” nor on how to stiffen
border security and interior enforcement to prevent another
wave of unauthorized migration.
 Not Sick Of Winning Yet - While Historic
NK/US Summit Grabs Headlines, 2,300 Suspected Online
Child Sex Offenders Were Arrested
By Susan Duclos - All News Pipeline
June 13, 2018
While there are no shortage of headlines regarding the first
ever summit between an American President and the
leader of the North Korea regime, with a signed agreement
between the two leaders, which included North Korea
committing "to work toward complete denuclearization of
the Korean Peninsula," what has seen less traction in the
media is that the DOJ just announced the results of a three
month operation which netted the arrest of 2,300 suspected
online child sex offenders.
The Department of Justice today
announced the arrest of more than 2,300
suspected online child sex offenders during
a three-month, nationwide, operation
conducted by Internet Crimes Against
Children (ICAC) task forces. The task
forces identified 195 offenders who either
produced child pornography or committed
child sexual abuse, and 383 children who
suffered recent, ongoing, or historical
sexual abuse or production of child
pornography.
The 61 ICAC task forces, located in all 50
states and comprised of more than 4,500
federal, state, local and tribal law
enforcement agencies, led the coordinated
operation known as “Broken Heart” during
the months of March, April, and May 2018.
During the course of the operation, the task
forces investigated more than 25,200
267
complaints of technology-facilitated crimes
against children and delivered more than
3,700 presentations on Internet safety to
over 390,000 youth and adults.
"No child should ever have to endure
sexual abuse," Attorney General Jeff
Sessions said. "And yet, in recent years,
certain forms of modern technology have
facilitated the spread of child pornography
and created greater incentives for its
production. We at the Department of
Justice are determined to strike back
against these repugnant crimes. It is
shocking and very sad that in this one
operation, we have arrested more than
2,300 alleged child predators and
investigated some 25,200 sexual abuse
complaints. Any would-be criminal should
be warned: this Department will remain
relentless in hunting down those who
victimize our children."
The operation targeted suspects who: (1)
produce, distribute, receive and possess
child pornography; (2) engage in online
enticement of children for sexual purposes;
(3) engage in the sex trafficking of children;
and (4) travel across state lines or to
foreign countries and sexually abuse
children.
While previously shutting down BackPage, which had
been associated with over 73 percent of suspected child
trafficking reports, along with the arrests and indictments
of the top members of the organization, this latest
announcement, shows that this administration's vow to
battle sex trafficking and arrest and prosecute child sex
traffickers, is being relentlessly waged against those in the
human trafficking industry.
From Backpage to the Nxivm sex cult arrests, to
nationwide stings as the FBI cracks down on child sex
trafficking, with 150 arrests here, 300 there, 1,000
elsewhere..... the numbers are adding up, which shows that
local and state governments with the full cooperation of
the Trump administration, is fulfilling the promises made
to try to eradicate sex trafficking in America.
This is not news that hits the mainstream every day, most
often it is reported locally in whichever state has
conducted an operation or sting, which is why we don't
often hear how successful the operation against human
traffickers and child sex traffickers, truly is.
According to an International Labor Organization report
from 2014, human trafficking, globally, is a $150 billion a
year business for human traffickers, with $99 billion being
earned directly from from commercial sexual exploitation.
From President Trump's February 2017 meeting with anti-
trafficking experts throughout his first year and into his
second year of presidency, this administration has
consistently addressed human trafficking, with his March
2018 statement reaffirming his vow, saying
"My Administration will focus on ending the
absolutely horrific practice of human
trafficking. And I am prepared to bring the
full force and weight of our government,
whatever we can do, in order to solve this
horrific problem."
No matter how you cut it, taking one trafficker off the
streets or from online, saving one child, is already a win,
but 2,300 arrests in a three-month operation, on top of the
local and statewide operations garnering hundreds at a
time, saving countless children from sexual abuse..... is a
huge win.
Note: Before I could even finish this article, a new DOJ
Release just hit my email box, titled "Acting Associate
Attorney General Jesse Panuccio Delivers Remarks at
the National Law Enforcement Training on Child
Exploitation."
Flashback, February 2017:
268
THE SUMMIT
The historical summit came after NK leader Kim Jong un
released three American prisoners, suspended his testing
and demolished one of, if not the largest site. Going in,
there was no guarantee there would be anything signed,
although it was largely thought that the preparation
beforehand gave them a plotted course to get something
signed, to be considered just a first step in what will be a
long process.
The intent terms signed included four stated goals;
1) The United States and the DPRK commit to establish
new US-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire
of the peoples of the two countries for peace and
prosperity.
2) The United States and DPRK will join their efforts to
build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean
Peninsula.
3) Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration,
the DPRK commits to work toward complete
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
4) The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering
POW/MIA remains, including the immediate
repatriation of those already identified.
What wasn't included in the statement signed but was
announced is that President Trump suspended military
drills with South Korea. While the media negatively
jumped on that, those exercises are months away and can
be reinstated at any time if Kim does not move forward
with further negotiations and agreements, so it was a no-
brainer.
There is no guarantee whatsoever that Kim will act in good
faith, everyone knows that. With that said, President
Trump has already managed to do what no other U.S.
leader has been able to do, he got Kim to the table with a
mixture of harsh rhetoric (Little Rocket Man - My nuke
button is bigger than yours - etc...) along with assurances
that should he act in good faith and continue to do so, his
standing and his country would be better off.
In that vein, the White House showed Kim a video
guaranteed to play to the "you can be seen as a great leader
if....." mindset, showing him the standing boost he would
receive in the eyes of the world if he works towards it.
When a man has a huge ego, playing to it must be included
in your arsenal of tools.
The mainstream media is all over the place on reporting
this with NYT headlining "Trump and Kim Have Just
Walked Us Back From the Brink of War," at the same
time as publishing the headline from another writer stating
"Trump Was Outfoxed in Singapore."
They just cannot converge on one set narrative here
because the summit was unprecedented.
One common theme seen in most the liberal media outlets
today is their reference to human rights issues, and their
claim that President Trump did not address those with
Kim, but as reported by Breitbart:
269
"Later, responding to a direct question from
John Roberts of Fox News about human
rights, Trump said that the issue had been
discussed — though he admitted it had not
been as prominent as denuclearization.
“They will be doing things” to improve the
country’s human rights situation, he said."
So outlets claiming the issue was not discussed at all,
either missed that or are lying.
You decide.
Either way, the main goal was to get Kim to the table, to
discuss denuclearizing and that was accomplished as just
the first step, with many more hopefully to come.
The fact is, while North Korea is a brutal regime and no
one should forget that, walking back from the brink of
nuclear war had to come first, because the issue of human
rights means nothing if the country is leveled and only
bodies, dust and debris are left.
BOTTOM LINE
Between the historical summit between Kim and President
Trump and the news of the continued efforts on the part of
the Trump administration to battle the horrible human
trafficking epidemic and the sexual trafficking of children,
the phrase "still not sick of winning yet" comes to mind.
 Trump Declares Pravda Media’s ‘FAKE NEWS’ Our
Greatest Threat: Here’s Why He’s RIGHT
Posted On June 13, 2018
(National Sentinel) Spot-On: The establishment media has
been so obviously and outrageously hostile to President
Donald Trump since before he took office that recent
studies have found that he received negative coverage 90
percent of the time.
This, despite the fact that things are good in America and
that is due largely to the president and his policies.
He’s had a bit of help here and there from the Republican
congressional majority — tax reform, most notably, and in
repealing burdensome, expensive regulations imposed by
Obama on his way out the door.
The results have been momentous: Rocketing stock market
growth, economic growth, historic low unemployment,
manufacturing jobs coming back to the U.S., and progress
in renegotiating horrible trade deals.
At the same time, Trump has managed to reaffirm
America’s global leadership role while staring down
Russia and China and moving closer to an actual
denuclearization deal with North Korea.
There has been plenty of good news to report. But the
Pravda media refuses to do so, and in the process has
relied instead upon concocted narratives like “collusion”
.
270
and “obstruction” based on fake information passed along
by “anonymous” sources to create phony news — all in an
effort to undermine Trump’s presidency.
What’s more, the Pravda media know
this Russian collusion story is a
hoax. They know there is no evidence to
support such a claim because no
evidence exists. It didn’t happen.
But they continue to report as though it is true.
Now, the president himself is calling out the Pravda media
by declaring that its fake news reporting is harming our
country and his ability to conduct domestic and world
affairs. He sees that as our nation’s biggest threat…and
he’s right.
As reported by CNS News:
Criticizing some of the liberal media’s
coverage of the U.S-North Korea summit
on denuclearization, President Donald
Trump said “Fake News” outlets NBC and
CNN are trying to “downplay” the summit, a
deal they would have praised a year ago,
and added that America’s “biggest enemy
is Fake News,” which is “so easily
promulgated by fools!”
In a June 13 tweet, the president wrote,
“So funny to watch the Fake News,
especially NBC and CNN. They are fighting
hard to downplay the deal with North
Korea.”
 Drudge Headline: Cohen Flips? — Another
Mueller Investigation Leak Day Before IG Report
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 10:14 Am

ABC News reported:

As attorneys for Michael Cohen rush to

meet Judge Kimba Wood’s Friday deadline
to complete a privilege review of over 3.7
million documents seized in the April 9
raids of Cohen’s New York properties and
law office, a source representing this
matter has disclosed to ABC News that the
law firm handling the case for Cohen is not
expected to represent him going forward.
To date, Cohen has been represented by
Stephen Ryan and Todd Harrison of the
Washington and New York firm,
Flip on what? McDermott, Will & Emery LLP.
Russian collusion? No replacement counsel has been
There is no Russian collusion. Isn’t that identified as of this time.
obvious by now? Cohen, now with no legal representation, is
This latest media leak comes the day likely to cooperate with federal prosecutors
before the much anticipated Inspector in New York, sources said. This
General report. development, which is believed to be
imminent, will likely hit the White House,
family members, staffers and counsels
They are trying to change the subject. hard.

271
 A Blow To Interventionists,
As US And North Korea Move Toward Peace
By Jeffrey Sommers – Peter Paik
June 13, 2018

of nuclear weapons in order to prevent regime change.

North Korea carried out its first successful test of an atom
bomb in October 2006.

The fates of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, executed by hanging,

Photo by Dan Scavino Jr. | Public Domain
Critics and pundits have been reacting dismissively to
President Donald Trump’s engagement with North Korea’s
Kim Jong Un. A few weeks ago Donald Trump was going
to start World War III with the Korean peninsula’s
“Rocket Man,” or so observers said. Now, the prospect for
peace, which has never been formally codified by treaty
with North Korea since 1953, seems to have critics equally
vexed and upset.
Yet, hoping for peace to fail in order to prevent Trump
from gaining a victory is to engage in precisely the type of
behavior his critics accuse him of displaying.
It is premature to determine the ultimate outcome of this
meeting between Trump and Kim. But such a meeting is
precisely what President Barack Obama suggested doing in
2008. The GOP derided Obama for this proposal, and
many Democrats likely scorned it at the time as well, and
they certainly are now.
Engaging North Korea is challenging. First, there is the
legacy of the war from 1950-53, in which the North was
completely bombed into rubble. The end of the Cold War
did little to alleviate tensions; indeed, North Korea had
nowhere to turn when it suffered a deadly famine in the
1990s that took anywhere from 500,000 to 3.5 million
lives in a country with a population of 22 million.
After 9-11, President George W. Bush named North Korea
along with Iraq and Iran as the “Axis of Evil.” Bush
intended to send a strong message to North Korea’s then-
Supreme Leader Kim Jong-Il. Yet, the elder Kim drew
another conclusion, which was to accelerate development
272
and of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, whose killing and
mutilation was filmed by a rebel militia, further fixed in
mind the lesson that to protect one’s regime it is necessary
to possess weapons of mass destruction. After all, Gaddafi
unilaterally gave up his chemical and nuclear weapons
programs to improve Libya’s relations with the West. The
uprisings of the Arab Spring, however, led the liberal
interventionists in Washington and Europe to back the
forces seeking his overthrow.
But, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, according to
President Trump, is willing to denuclearize. What might be
his reasons for disarming and trusting the US, when doing
so led Gaddafi to a bloody and gruesome end? And what
are the grounds for trusting North Korea this time, when
the arms control agreements of the past have fallen apart?
The current situation hints that conditions in North Korea
may have shifted in decisive ways. Much of the population
in the North appears to have attained a higher standard of
living through illegal or semi-legal trade. Such gains are
threatened by US-led sanctions, and the triage measures
taken by North Korea in the past may not be as effective in
keeping the country afloat. Although North Korea remains
in principle a socialist state, nevertheless, the government
has built complexes for its citizens to engage in this
unofficial commerce.
Second, the US proposal to halt military exercises with
South Korea is a goodwill gesture that assuages North
Korea’s concern for its security and gives neighbors China
and Russia greater incentive to cooperate with the US.
Third, Trump’s embrace of Obama’s 2008 strategy to talk
with leaders “hostile” to the US, along with rejection of
regime change policies of neoconservatives and liberal
interventionists may bring about greater regional stability
by reducing the risk of armed conflict, a prospect that
China and Russia are certain to welcome along with the
two Koreas.
Finally, the administration of Moon Jae-in in South Korea In short, neoconservatives and liberal interventionists aside
has committed itself to engaging the North, breaking with in the United States, there is much to cautiously herald in
the hardline stances of the two previous presidents. What the current moves by Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump
should not be expected is for North Korea to dismantle its toward peace in North Korea.
nuclear industry. Nuclear technology can be used to
generate electricity and is a prestige item for the North
generally.

273
 BOOM! President Trump: America’s Greatest Enemy Is
Fake Liberal News “Promulgated By Fools!”
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 10:44 Am
According to the latest FOX News poll
President Donald Trump has a better
rating than Presidents Obama and
Reagan at the same point in their
presidencies. President Trump’s
approval is now at 45%.
And that is with 90% negative
coverage from the far left mainstream
media.
The liberal media hates this president and continues to
spread Fake News on almost a daily basis to take him
down.
On Wednesday President Trump blasted
the liberal Fake News media.
CNS News reported:
274
Criticizing some of the liberal media’s coverage of the
U.S-North Korea summit on denuclearization, President
Donald Trump said “Fake News” outlets NBC and CNN
are trying to “downplay” the summit, a deal they would
have praised a year ago, and added that America’s “biggest
enemy is Fake News,” which is “so easily promulgated by
fools!”
In a June 13 tweet, the president wrote,
“So funny to watch the Fake News,
especially NBC and CNN. they are fighting
hard to downplay the deal with North
Korea.”
“500 days ago they would have ‘begged’
for this deal — looked like war would break
out [then],” he wrote.
“Our Country’s biggest enemy is the Fake
News so easily promulgated by fools!” said
President Trump.
 WTH? Deputy AG Rosenstein THREATENED To
Subpoena Records From GOP Lawmakers,
Staff In ‘Personal ATTACK’
Posted On June 13, 2018
(National Sentinel) Deep State: Where in the blue blazes
of Hades is Attorney General Jeff Sessions? His Justice
Department has been completely hijacked by a Deep State
careerist, Rod Rosenstein, who sees his number one
priority these days as defending the dirty and keeping the
D.C. swamp filled with creatures.
The deputy AG threatened to “subpoena” emails, phone
records and other documents from lawmakers and staff on
a Republican-led House committee during a tense meeting
earlier this year, according to Fox News‘ Catherine
Herridge.
Aides called it a “personal attack” on the committee and
Republicans in particular.
The emails memorialized a January 2018
closed-door meeting involving senior FBI
and Justice Department officials as well as
members of the House Intelligence
Committee. The account claimed
Rosenstein threatened to turn the tables on
the committee’s inquiries regarding the
Russia probe.
“The DAG [Deputy Attorney General
Rosenstein] criticized the Committee for
sending our requests in writing and was
further critical of the Committee’s request
to have DOJ/FBI do the same when
responding,” the committee’s then-senior
275
counsel for counterterrorism Kash Patel
wrote to the House Office of General
Counsel, Herridge reported.
“Going so far as to say that if the
Committee likes being litigators, then ‘we
[DOJ] too [are] litigators, and we will
subpoena your records and your emails,’
referring to HPSCI [House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence] and
Congress overall.”
Herridge said a second GOP staffer supported Patel’s
version of events.
“Let me just add that watching the Deputy
Attorney General launch a sustained
personal attack against a congressional
staffer in retaliation for vigorous oversight
was astonishing and disheartening. …
Also, having the nation’s #1 (for these
matters) law enforcement officer threaten
to ‘subpoena your calls and emails’ was
downright chilling,” the second unnamed
staffer wrote.
The committee staffer noted that Rosenstein’s comment
could be interpreted as meaning the department would
“vigorously defend a contempt action” — which might be
expected. But the staffer continued, “I also read it as a not-
so-veiled threat to unleash the full prosecutorial power of
the state against us.”
This is unbelievable. This goes beyond
simply defending the integrity of the
Justice Department.
In fact, you could make the argument that Rosenstein is
abusing the power of the federal government in the same
way the Obama administration did when it launched
“Spygate” — an operation that Congress has a
constitutional duty to investigate and which the
subordinate Justice Department has a duty to cooperate.
The FBI and DoJ claimed Rosenstein was just making it
clear he would defend himself and the department against
any contempt charge issued by Congress.
But he wouldn’t have to do that if he was
complying with legitimate requests by
Congress for information.
.
276
As for Sessions, he was defending
Rosenstein, the de facto head of DoJ.
POTUS Trump is going to have to intervene in this dog-
and-pony show at some point. Congress is within its
authority to investigate alleged abuses of the law by
subordinate federal agencies. The FBI and DoJ are not
exempt from that oversight.
 Mueller’s Fraudulent “Made Up” Cases And Indictments
Are Unraveling – Time To Shut Dirty Cop Mueller Down
And Indict His Entire Gang
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 10:54 Am

One of the most profound interviews that described the

events over the past few years by the corrupt and criminal
individuals in the Deep State that led to the Mueller
investigation was reported by the Daily Caller in January.
Legal expert Joe DiGenova explained the many criminal
activities by the Deep State –

Very few Americans who voted for

President Trump would believe that
today we have a special investigation
into the President for collusion with
Russia during the election and none
into the many Clinton and Obama
criminal activities unearthed over the
past decade.

More than one year ago, on May 17, 2017, corrupt

Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed a
Special Counsel to look into the phony Trump – Russia
collusion allegations, a total scam to remove Donald
Trump from the Presidency that he won.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself of
anything related to Russia during the 2016 Presidential
campaign and the Robert Mueller Special Counsel team
took over to investigate the alleged Trump crimes.
Ironically over the past year, no crimes
related to the President have been
uncovered but numerous crimes have
been uncovered related to the Deep
State’s corruption, abuse and brazen
disregard for the rule of law through the
Trump – Russia ‘Witch Hunt’.
Corrupt and dirty cop Mueller started the ‘witch hunt’ and
began looking into individuals with any relationship with
President Trump. Mueller’s team were not interested in
crimes that President Trump committed. There are none.
Instead, Mueller went after anyone with any relationship to
the President. His entire team has serious conflicts of
interest and his investigation is unconstitutional, but this
has not deterred Mueller.
Dirty Cop Mueller and his team went
ahead and indicted some individuals
related to the President and then he
apparently made up other individuals
out of thin air and indicted them too.
Here’s a list of the indictments and their
current status.

277
General Mike Flynn
The biggest indictment to date by the dirty cops and
attorneys on the Mueller team was the indictment of
General Flynn for lying to the FBI. One of the two
individuals that Flynn apparently lied to was Peter Strzok
in a discussion at the White House shortly after the
inauguration. Strzok was the lead investigator who took
Hillary Clinton’s testimony in her email scandal and
Strzok was apparently fine when with Hillary destroyed
her server, 30,000 emails, numerous phones with hammers
and lied to him and all of America. However, shortly after
Flynn spoke with Strzok, former Attorney General Sally
Yates went to the White House and told the President the
General had lied.
Flynn was fired by the President and then when Mueller
started his witch hunt he charged Flynn for lying to the
FBI. Flynn eventually pled guilty but the judge overseeing
the case was recused. Judge Rudolph Contreras was also a
FISA Court judge and a friend of Strzok’s.
To date Flynn has not been sentenced after the new judge
demanded Mueller provide the General with all
information related to his case. Also, new evidence has
unfolded of Sally Yates and/or former FBI Head Andrew
McCabe doctoring and destroying evidence that led to
Flynn’s conviction. The Senate has asked the FBI and
DOJ for this support but it has not been provided to date
because some expect it is not there (it was destroyed).
They have also asked for the other FBI Agent who
interviewed Flynn with Strzok but to date the FBI will not
allow him to be interviewed by the Senate.
The entire Flynn case is now not only
falling apart but it appears Strzok, Yates,
McCabe, Mueller and possibly others may
be involved in crimes in doctoring and
destroying evidence and charging Flynn for
a crime as a result.
The 13 Russians ‘Made Up’ by the Mueller Team
In an effort to tie their corrupt investigation to Russia, the
Mueller team indicted 13 Russians after presenting their
cases to a grand jury in February of this year.
Immediately, these indictments were suspect as everyone
on to the corrupt Mueller team knew that these ‘Russians’
would never be brought to justice, even if they were real,
because they would never come to the US to stand trial and
risk being put in jail.
Unfortunately for Mueller however, this too has turned
into a royal mess.
Lawyers defending one of three Russian companies
indicted with the 13 Russians, Concord Management,
showed up for court. Mueller’s team was caught off guard
278
and never expected this. They immediately asked the
judge for more time but the judge denied their pleas noting
that they were the ones who indicted the Russian company
in the first place.
When the case proceeded, the Concord attorney’s noted
that another of the three companies indicted by Mueller
was not in existence at the time of Mueller’s indictment.
They called this a case of Mueller indicting the proverbial
‘ham sandwich’.
At a following court appearance, the attorneys representing
Concord stated that the corrupt Mueller team’s allegations
of 13 Russian individuals impacting the 2016 election
were “made up” nonsense. The individuals were not even
real.
Concord Management’s lawyers revealed that Mueller’s
team had ignored over 70 discovery requests they had
made for information before the case. In response
Mueller’s team offered to give Concord Management’s
lawyers a massive amount of social media data from those
dangerous trolls who sought to influence the US election
and the majority of the data was in RUSSIAN.
Mueller’s lawyers then admitted that they don’t even have
English translations for the Russian social media posts.
Mueller’s lawyers don’t have English translations of the
Russian social media posts but somehow Americans were
influenced by these Russian language posts?
Yesterday it was reported that Mueller’s team didn’t want
to hand over the data that had been accumulated related to
the Russians because the Russians would then use the
information to spy on Americans (ignoring that they
supposedly already had).
The case of the Russians has quickly turned into a big
joke. The Mueller team should be ashamed for bringing it
to the court and indicted for making the whole thing up.
Paul Manafort
Paul Manafort was President Trump’s campaign manager
for a short time during the 2016 election. The Mueller
team initially charged him with multiple counts of not
filling in forms required by the law starting in 2005. In an
effort to pay his legal fees, Manafort borrowed money
using personal collateral or real estate. Mueller and his
team then charged Manafort with bank fraud claiming
these loans overstated the value of his properties. This
past week Mueller’s team then charged Manafort with
trying to tamper with witnesses.
Manafort’s attorneys have argued that the entire case was
unconstitutional based on no crime committed by Trump
required to set up a Special Counsel and the scope of the
case being unlimited and therefore also against the law
related to Special Counsels. However, the judge on one of
Manafort’s cases is Obama appointed Judge Jackson.
With her record it is doubtful that Manafort will receive a
fair trial and she already has disagreed with these
arguments from Manafort’s legal team.
Fortunate for Manafort another judge overseeing one of his
cases, Judge T. S. Ellis, has asked Mueller’s team for the
scope document of the Special Counsel investigation.
When the Mueller team said it was classified, the judge
said he would be the judge of that.
This case has been delayed due to the judge’s family issues
but the judge is due to opine on Manafort’s team’s
argument that the indictments were beyond the scope of
Mueller’s Special Counsel’s mandate. If the judge agrees,
at least one of Manaforts cases may be thrown out. Trump
lawyer Rudy Giuliani said he wouldn’t be surprised if
Judge Ellis dismisses Manafort’s cases for government
misconduct as well.
Rick Gates
Richard Gates pleaded not guilty to all charges against him
by Mueller, many related to years before the election.
Rick Gates was named alongside Manafort in the recent
charges brought by the special counsel. He’s accused of 11
counts related to filing false income tax returns and three
counts of failure to report foreign bank and financial
accounts.
Gates pleaded guilty on Feb. 23 to federal conspiracy and
false-statements charges.
In wake of the guilty plea, Mueller moved to drop the 22
bank and tax fraud charges against him. The decision to
drop the more expansive charges against Gates could
suggest that the former Trump campaign official is
cooperating and providing good information to Mueller’s
team.
Manafort has challenged the court as to the
constitutionality of indictments for activities before the
.
279
2016 election. He has a valid argument which would no
doubt relate to Gates’ case as well.
George Papadopoulos
Papadopoulos has a questionable background. He was a
young man who traveled to the UK and apparently was set
up by spies inserted into the Trump campaign by the FBI
in early 2016.
A former foreign policy adviser to Trump’s presidential
campaign, George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty in 2017 to
making false statements to the FBI regarding “the timing,
extent and nature of his relationships and interactions with
certain foreign nationals whom he understood to have
close connections with senior Russian government
officials,” according to court documents.
Papadopoulos, like the others indicted, is under gag orders
so we really don’t know what he did or said to the FBI. If
he was set up as has been implied in the recent news
stories, he too may have a chance to have his case
overturned.
Alex van der Zwaan and Richard Pinedo
These are two individuals no one has ever heard of or will
ever remember. van der Zwan was charged with lying to
the FBI and Pinedo was charged for selling bank accounts
to Russians, even though Pinedo said he didn’t know he
was selling accounts to Russians. Both cases sound
suspect and more related to abuse of power by the Mueller
team than actual crimes being committed.
All in all, Mueller’s indictments are
pathetic and falling apart. He and his
team of corrupt and conflicted deep
state crooks should not only have their
cases thrown out, they should be
indicted for their actions and efforts to
overthrow the duly elected President of
the United States, Donald J. Trump. Let
justice be served!
 Trump Effect: China Pulled Anti-Aircraft Missiles From
South China Sea Island BEFORE Trump-Kim Summit
Posted On June 13, 2018
(National Sentinel) De-escalation: In what appears to be a
direct result of White House diplomacy, China removed
anti-aircraft missile batteries from one of its reclaimed
islands in the South China Sea last week, ahead of
President Donald Trump’s historic summit with North
Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
The removal of the missile batteries from Woody Island, in
the Paracels chain, was discovered by Israeli intelligence
firm ImageSat International (ISI). The image was taken
June 3.
The Washington Times notes:
The Chinese militarization of the South
China Sea has been happening for some
time. Since the weak Obama administration
wouldn’t stand up to any dictator, the
Chinese, along with other adversaries,
probably just said “Why not?” and
proceeded with their malignant behavior in
creating the ability to block traffic in one of
the world’s busiest sea lanes.
Anti-ship missile batteries, anti-aircraft
defense systems, fighter jets and bombers
have all been sighted on the atolls in the
region that China has claimed and fortified.
Satellite imagery and new analysis from
Israeli intelligence firm ImageSat
International (ISI), dated June 3, suggested
the Chinese surface-to-air missile systems
on Woody Island, in the Paracel Islands,
may have been removed or relocated, The
South China Morning Post reported.
280
Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie declared
the Chinese may have removed them for
maintenance purposes, or simply hidden
them inside buildings, only to be
redeployed again later, wrote SCMP.
“With the increasingly tense relations
between the two countries, it’s
understandable that we make a little
gesture of compromise,” said Li.
“It’s not wise for China to directly confront
the U.S. We shall decide later [on possible
redeployment] after the tensions go down.
“It’s better that we make three steps
forward and two steps back, because both
sides are still restrained and neither side
wants to go to war,” wrote SCMP, quoting
Ni Lexiong, a naval expert with Shanghai
University of Political Science and Law.
The South China Morning Post is no official mouthpiece
of the Chinese government. Based in Hong Kong, it has
some degree of press autonomy. Still, Beijing essentially
‘allowed’ the report to be published, so that its gesture
would be noticed.
But was it tied to the summit? Possibly.
It should be noted that POTUS Trump and China signed a
deal recently with Chinese telecom company ZTE,
extracting fines and monitoring in a face-saving measure
for both sides.
So the removal of the missiles could also be tied to that
gesture of goodwill by the president.
But the point regarding the difference in diplomacy
between the Obama and Trump administrations is spot-on:
Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo, the latter of whom will be traveling to
China in the coming days, have made it clear the U.S. will
not back down in the South China Sea and simply cede the
entire body of water to Beijing.
Stay tuned.
 Tom Steyer: I’m Worried About
Trump Staging A Coup Against Democrats
Why Would The Sitting President Need To Stage A Coup Against A Political
Party That Currently Controls Nothing In America?
By NTK Staff
06.13.2018 @11:48am
Speaking at a town hall in Seattle, Washington on Tuesday
night, liberal billionaire Tom Steyer told the crowd that he
was worried President Trump would erode democracy and
tyrannically take power from the Democrats.
An audience member, who said she previously lived under
a dictatorship, said she was worried that Trump would
stage a military coup in the middle of the night and arrest
Democrats.
281
“So, the question is, are we worried about
the idea of a complete breakdown of civil
society, an attempt to use the Justice
Department for political purposes, an
attempt to use it to attack political
opponents regardless of whether the
Justice Department believes that’s fair and
called for, and whether that wouldn’t be a
subversion of the rule of law we have been
fighting for?” Steyer asked.
Steyer said, “Yes,” he is worried about Trump establishing
authoritarianism in the country.
The Democratic mega-donor called the president “lawless”
and asked “patriots” to protect America’s democratic
system from his dictatorial transformations.
It’s not clear exactly why President Trump would need to
stage a coup against the Democratic Party, which controls
neither chamber of Congress and do not occupy the
presidency.
 Rep Gaetz: Rosenstein’s Threats Left Congressional Staff
Members “Physically Shaking In My Office”
In Fear For Their Families
By Cristina Lail
June 13, 2018, 11:49 Am

Deputy Attorney General Rod

Gregg Jarrett says what Rosenstein did
Rosenstein threatened to subpoena
is a crime.
emails, phone records and other
documents of Republican lawmakers on
the House Intel Committee back in
January, confirming previous reports

Of course the FBI and DOJ are disputing this account and
defending Rosenstein.

The swamp always protects their own.

On Tuesday, Fox News Catherine Herridge reported on

A DOJ official told Fox News that Rosenstein “never
emails obtained memorializing a January 18, closed-door
threatened anyone in the room with a criminal
meeting with DOJ, FBI and House Intel members where
investigation.” The official said the department and bureau
Rosenstein threatened GOP-led staffers if they didn’t stop
officials in the room “are all quite clear that the
their investigation.
characterization of events laid out here is false,” adding
that Rosenstein was responding to a threat of contempt.
This Fox News report confirms what attorney Gregg Jarrett
previously stated in early February.
On Tuesday night Jeff Sessions told Tucker Carlson that
he did not believe Rosenstein threatened Congress.
Gregg Jarrett tweeted: A 2nd source has now confirmed
to me that, in a meeting on January 10, Deputy A-G
Rep Matt Gaetz (R-FL) said on
Rosenstein used the power of his office to threaten to
Wednesday morning he saw first hand
subpoena the calls & texts of the Intel Committee to get it
what Rosenstein’s threats did to
to stop it’s investigation of DOJ and FBI. Likely an Abuse
Congressional staff members.
of Power & Obstruction.
Gaetz tweeted:

The #DOJ’s intimidation & stone-walling

tactics have gone too far. I’ve heard first-
hand from congressional staff following
threats delivered Deputy AG #Rosenstein.
Staff has literally been scared to the point
of physically shaking in my office out of
concern for their family.

282

Gaetz continued to hammer Rosenstein
over his threats and stonewalling.
Gaetz then called for Rosenstein, a
person who “improperly signed a FISA
application renewal,” to recuse himself
.
283
from investigations into Trump’s
campaign and behavior of officials at
the FBI and DOJ, citing conflicts of
interest.
Rod Rosenstein is the cancer of the Justice Department and
must be removed.
Sources say Rosenstein is behind the stonewalling and
slow walking and attempted redactions of the much-
anticipated IG report.
Rosenstein is also trying to block Senate Judiciary
Chairman Chuck Grassley from interviewing FBI Special
Agent Joe Pientka because he has damning information on
the altered General Flynn 302’s.
 Dem Senator Tries To Get DOJ Official To
Say There’s Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion
Sen. Richard Blumenthal Wanted One Election Security Expert To Say That
President Trump's Campaign Coordinated With The Russian Government To Steal
The 2016 Election.
By NTK Staff
06.12.2018 @11:52am

of 2016,” he said. “On the question of

whether there is evidence, would you agree
with me that there is some evidence?”
“It’s not appropriate for me to comment,”
Hickey responded, referring to the probe as
an “ongoing investigation.”

Blumenthal listed all the “facts” he believes point toward

collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. The
senator asked Hickey if he was aware of all the instances
he presented.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, “If those facts were true, wouldn’t it be
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) tried to force Deputy evidence of collusion between the Trump
Assistant Attorney General Adam Hickey to say that campaign and the Russian interference?”
evidence existed that President Trump’s campaign worked he asked.
with Russian intelligence to swing the 2016 presidential “I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to
election. comment in any respect on a pending
matter,” Hickey responded, ending
“There have been statements about there Blumenthal’s question period.
being no evidence of any collusion
between the Trump campaign and the
Russian attempt to interfere in our elections
.

284
 MSNBC Panelist: Conservative Christians
Have 'Sold Soul' For Trump, Without Much In Return
By Kristine Marsh
June 13, 2018 12:35 PM EDT
Following controversial Republican nominee, Corey
Stewart’s win for Virginia Senate race and Never Trumper
Mark Sanford’s loss in South Carolina’s race, MSNBC
devoted a lengthy segment to discussing everything wrong
morally with the Republican party, on Stephanie Ruhle’s
show, June 13. Using Stewart’s win as the starting point,
Ruhle’s liberal guests teared into the GOP and Christians
for losing their “conscience” and “selling their souls” for
President Trump, whom one guest claimed didn’t even
have any notable accomplishments in office to date.
Following controversial Republican nominee, Corey
Stewart’s win for Virginia Senate race and Never Trumper
Mark Sanford’s loss in South Carolina’s race, MSNBC
devoted a lengthy segment to discussing everything wrong
morally with the Republican party, on Stephanie Ruhle’s
show, June 13. Using Stewart’s win as the starting point,
Ruhle’s liberal guests teared into the GOP and Christians
for losing their “conscience” and “selling their souls” for
President Trump, whom one guest claimed didn’t even
have any notable accomplishments in office to date.
Ruhle began by asking her guests, New York Times’
correspondent Mark Leibovich and former aide to Bush Sr.
and speechwriter for George W. Bush, Peter Wehner, what
these results meant for the Republican party. Referencing
Stewart and Steve King’s controversial tweets, Ruhle
asked where the “conscience” of the GOP was. Wehner
claimed Republicans had no conscience.
“Well, it doesn't exist anymore. And the
results of last night are going to make it
even truer,” he began.
Wehner went on to claim that many high
ranking Republicans were actually never
Trumpers, like himself. “But they won’t
285
speak publicly because they are afraid of
losing,” he noted.
Taking the media’s favorite role as armchair psychologist,
Wehner accused Trump of having a “disorder personality”
and Republicans of behaving like a “cult.” Ruhle then
played a clip of Mitch McConnell praising the Trump
presidency as the most “conservative” era since he has
been in politics. The panel scoffed at that notion and
completely dismissed the good things Trump has done
while in office. Wehner even went so far as to claim that
he’s done much less for conservatives than any president
before him.
[T]hat claim by McConnell is ridiculous,
even on the grounds of policy, Trump
has not achieved that much. The tax cut
was the big thing. The reality is that if
you look at what he's achieved versus
Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush or
any other president, Republican
Democrat or in the first year it's pretty
minimal.
Sounding more like a hardened Democrat, Wehner kept
ranting about how awful and evil President Trump was to
the country’s morality, and slammed Republicans for
aiding this “moral idiot’s” “assault on truth:”
This is a man who is a pathological liar,
who is not only engaged on an assault
on truth, he's trying to annihilate truth.
The Republican party is his sword and
shield. And they're complicit in the lies
and complicit in the deep immorality,
and I don’t just mean morality in terms
of his sexual ethics, I’m talking a about
a man who's basically at his heart, a
nihilist, a kind of Niesche and a person
who believes that might makes right.
And the Republican party which was
born in the era of the Civil War and
Lincoln, who is the greatest moral
leader that America's ever produced is
now aligned with this person who is a
moral idiot.
Ruhle wondered how evangelical Republicans could
square away Trump’s personal immorality with his
favorable policy. Wehner had no qualms claiming
Christians were choosing Trump over God.
“They're selling their soul for judges.
And I don't think that's a good tradeoff.
There's a tremendous and huge
discrediting effect that's happening to
evangelical Christians,” Wehner blasted.
He went on to call out the religious right as hypocritical for
leading the way in the ‘90s regarding Clinton’s lack of
sexual ethics. Wehner point was completely missed,
however, by his complete disregard for the magnitude of
responsibility judges have in securing the rights of
religious liberty and shaping the morality of the country,
something that is arguably far more important to
Christians.
Leibovich got the last word, piggybacking on Wehner’s
previous point, that Trump had no real accomplishments to
boast of, and hadn’t led the country through any crisis yet,
seemingly ignoring Trump’s negotiation with North Korea
this week to denuclearize the hostile country.
Read the full transcript below:
9:23:16-9:32:31am
MSNBC Live with Stephanie Ruhle
6/13/18
STEVE KORNACKI: The other result we want to show you, this
one could have big implications. It’s Virginia, it’s the Republican
primary for the U.S. Senate. Corey Stewart, he's the winner. This
is what the Republican establishment suspected might happen
and feared would happen. Corey Stewart, one of his big issues is
the preservation of confederate monuments. He’s formed
alliances with people who are clearly anti-semitic, clearly racists.
He’s tried in the last couple of days to distance himself. There’s
been significant damage there.He will go up head to head in
November against Tim Kaine, the Democrat. Now the
expectations always been that in this climate of 2018, Kaine will
probably be in good shape no matter who he faces.
286
The problem for Republicans, Stewart doesn't just make beating
Tim Kaine that much tougher, Virginia potentially has three house
seats, three seats represented by Republicans that could wave
here go, that could go to Democrats. Having Corey Stewart with
those associations, that baggage and that kind of political
headache level at the top of the ticket is going to put all three of
those Republicans in very difficult positions that could drag the
entire ticket. Republicans nationally, not so much doing the
Senate race they're doing this morning. It’s that magic number of
23 house seats. They've got to keep the Democrats from getting
that number. And the Democrat test in Virginia may have gotten
a little easier after last night.
STEPHANIE RUHLE: Well we’ll see. Let’s bring my panel back
in. Mark, Mark Sanford losing, he lost the primary, but did he
maintenance his pride? He wasn't surprised, he said months ago,
he said I'm a dead man walking for doing this. But these
politicians they're in office, they're in public eye for years and
years. Is this okay for him?
MARK LEIBOVICH, CHIEF NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT
NEW YORK TIMES: Well, obviously, it is. This is sort of what --
this is someone who is willing to lose, basically. What we have in
Washington now is -- yeah, this is something that happens in
both parties but right now in the Republican party, you have self-
perpetuation, getting re-elected. Doing what it takes being the
overwhelming impetus for everything that they do. And Mark
Sanford decided, made a determination, look, I don't mind losing
I don't mind if this is what brings me down. Whether he can sleep
any better, I don't know. Look he’s got a lot of time on his hands
now. What is ironic, Mark Sanford disgraced this morning this
morning was called this morning the conscious of the Republican
party. I assume it's a very small sliver of the Republican party
saying that and thinking that and wishing that, I think it's an
emblem of where the Republican party has come in the last few
years.
RUHLE: Peter, you know quite a bit about the conscience of the
Republican party. Corey Stewart, in Virginia, a guy although
defends monuments. He’s very anti-immigrant we mentioned. He
tweeted last year, nothing is worse than a Yankee telling a
southerner that his monuments don't matter. So that happened
last night. And in the last week, Republican congressman Steve
King retweeted a British neo-nazi. And that's not even making
giant headlines.
So talk to me about the conscience of
the Republican party.
PETER WEHNER:
Well, it doesn't exist anymore. And the
results of last night are going to make it
even truer. It's an odd thing if you talk to
Republicans as I have, including high
ranking Republicans, they would share
the same view that I have about Donald
Trump, politically, morally. And the
 stories that they can tell you are much pointing to all of those federal judges appointed. Or may be the
worse actually than we know publicly. tax cuts. When I think values I think morality. I guess that's where
But they won't speak publicly, because my massive confusion comes from.
they are afraid of losing.
WEHNER:
And the results have now strengthened Trump's grip. Last night,
on the party. I do think that in the long term interest of the Yeah it’s fair. I mean the first thing that
Republican party and the republic itself, Republicans have to lose has to be said is that claim by
in the midterms. The only way that Trump's grip on the McConnell is ridiculous, even on the
Republican party is going to be loosened is if Republicans that grounds of policy, Trump has not
like being attached to him are going to come at a cause. They're achieved that much. The tax cut was the
not going to speak out against him. As far as Cory Stewart, look, big thing. The reality is that if you look
this is emblematic of where the Republican party is. He's at what he's achieved versus Ronald
basically a mini Trump. He's not going to win the race in Virginia Reagan or George W. Bush or any other
but he’s going to stay in the Republican party. As I said earlier in president, Republican Democrat or in
the previous segment, the first year it's pretty minimal.
Beyond that, it's exactly what you said.
It's not even a party you can't identify But Donald Trump is not a normal
ideologically, Trump himself has no
candidate and that is what is going on is
idealogy. He has not given any real time
not a normal event. This is a man who is
or thought to political ideas. It's a cult of a pathological liar, who is not only
personality. No matter what Trump
engaged on an assault on truth, he's
does, they unite behind it. Because he trying to annihilate truth. The
has a disorder personality, the Republican party is his sword and
Republican party as a party is taking on
shield. And they're complicit in the lies
those very characteristics. and complicit in the deep immorality,
and I don’t just mean morality in terms
RUHLE: I guess that’s what I don’t understand. When you say of his sexual ethics, I’m talking a about
what they say publicly and privately are so different. What I say a man who's basically at his heart, a
privately are the same things I say publicly just with more curses nihilist, a kind of Niesche and a person
in it. So I think to what Mitch McConnell said last week, I think we who believes that might makes right.
have the sound of what the last 16 months have been like. And the Republican party which was
born in the era of the Civil War and
MITCH MCCONNELL: In my view, the last 16 months have been Lincoln, who is the greatest moral
the single best period for conservative values since I came to leader that America's ever produced is
Washington as Ralph indicated back in 1985. This is not now aligned with this person who is a
hyperbole. moral idiot.

RUHLE: Huh? RUHLE: Okay. So, we can agree to that.

MARK LEIBOVICH: I'm not sure Mitch Mcconnell would say that But what do you see to evangelical
privately, to be perfectly honest with you. Look, they obviously Christians who say you don't need to
accomplished a great deal. But what we're talking about here is, I like the boss as long as he gets the job
don't know if you call it cowardice, or just pragmatism or done.
whatever, no this is, it's not news that politicians talk different
privately than they do publicly. Right now, it's more pronounced. So from the judicial appointment standpoint, don't you think
Look,I think at some point, we were saying this during the break, they're saying, who cares, I'm not going to know that guy in four
voters need to speak. We don't know what the toll will be on or eight years. And these judges will be in position for a lifetime?
Republicans for speaking out until voters render a verdict. It's not
just the Republican primary voters that we're talking about today, WEHNER:
they're going to make Cory Stewart, not just a state story but a
national story. It could be Todd Aiken, he could be Roy Moore,
he could drag down and uptick candidates also. But look At some Yeah, I’d say a couple of things, they're
point, the voters are going to make a verdict here. selling their soul for judges.

RUHLE: Okay. But the issue is conservative principles or values And I don't think that's a good tradeoff. There's a tremendous
versus policy. It almost seems like Mitch Mcconnell is saying for and huge discrediting effect that's happening to evangelical
conservatives its been an extraordinary 16 months. What he's Christians. They were ones, during the Clinton years and before,

287
who argued about the centrality of morality in leaders. They can LEIBOVICH:
never make those arguments again. And where the real
hypocrisy is, they could easily say, look, we agree with Trump on What I would also a, Ronald Reagan
judges. We agree with him on abortion policy. And he's actually governed during the Cold War. And
advanced things we care about. But on the other side, the George W. Bush governed in a crisis
annihilation of truth, the pathological lies, the cruelty and crudity. during his first term. He was tested by
All of those other things really bother us, but they will not say very, very really and threatening events.
that. Instead of what they've done, they’re 100% for him, they will Again, we keep reminding people, but
not give a voice of dissent. That is really a discrediting judgment Donald Trump really has not, at this
on it. point.

RUHLE: Well, when we try to raise decency which should be

above politics, people often get criticized for being cry baby
snowflakes so that doesn't exactly make sense?
.

288
 Morning Joe:
'The GOP Has Devolved Into Trumpist Cult'
By Cody Leach
June 13, 2018 2:00 PM EDT
Not even 24 hours removed since the most potentially
impactful foreign policy summit in a generation, the
mainstream media has returned to its Trump-bashing
obsession. On Wednesday morning, MSNBC host Joe
Scarborough declared:
“Primary voters in the Republican Party
have devolved into a Trumpist cult.”
The insults were aided by national affairs analyst John
Heilemann,
“It's clear that conservatism, liberalism,
voting records, none of those things matter,
it's a cult of personality and the president
has an extraordinary hold over his base.”
JOE SCARBOROUGH: It has devolved
into a cult. Primary voters in the Republican
Party have devolved into a Trumpist cult.
JOHN HEILEMANN: It's clear that
conservatism, liberalism, voting records,
none of those things matter, it's a cult of
personality and the president has an
extraordinary hold over his base. Cult of
personality is one good description for it.
For all of the people out there, at various
times everyone at this table and me, all of
us who have sat and said, why are
Republicans afraid of Donald Trump? Why
do they -- why will they never cross him?
He's terrible, he's this, he's that they should
have the courage of their convictions and
stand up to him. This is a good example.
Mark Sanford didn't even really stand up to
him, but President Trump brings the wrath
and Mark Sanford loses his job. The fact is,
if you get on the wrong side of Donald
Trump, his power over his base is
significant enough that he can kill you,
regardless of how conservative voting
record is. Regardless of your history in the
289
Republican Party. Regardless of your
ideology, regardless of everything else, if
he wants to put a target on your back, he
can and will.
SCARBOROUGH: The Republican Party
is not a conservative party. It's not
conservative intellectually. It's not
conservative physically. It's not
conservative temperamentally. You look at
everything whether, from Edmund Burke,
through Russell Kirk, through William F.
Buckley. Straight into Ronald Reagan.
What's happening today is an aberration of
all of those things. That's fine, I wonder
where conservatives go now.
Scarborough, the one-time GOP Congressman
representing the Florida panhandle went as far as stating
that
“The Republican party is not a conservative
party. It's not conservative intellectually. It's
not conservative physically. It's not
conservative temperamentally. You look at
everything whether, from Edmund Burke,
through Russell Kirk, through William F.
Buckley. Straight into Ronald Reagan.
What's happening today is an aberration of
all of those things. That's fine, I wonder
where conservatives go now.”
These ad-hominem attacks from the Morning Joe
host have become routine while he continues his self-
appointed crusade to delegitimize the President of the
United States.
While steering off script and levying unhinged attacks has
become the new normal for Morning Joe and MSNBC,
Scarborough, and his hosts find themselves again in an
awkward position where the facts disagree with him and
his fellow hosts. In a report released from the Heritage
Foundation earlier in the year, Donald Trump has
successfully compiled a record of meeting sixty-four
percent of their policy recommendations from the
“Mandate for Leadership”. Additionally, according to
director of Heritage’s congressional and executive
outreach, Thomas Binion,
“We’re blown away” and Trump “is very
active, very conservative, and very
effective.”
 GOP Lawmakers To Introduce Resolution Giving DOJ
7 Days To Turn Over Documents Owed To Congress
By Cristina Laila
June 13, 2018, 2:19 Pm
Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark
Meadows (R-NC) and fellow GOP Rep
Jim Jordan (R-OH) are set to introduce a
resolution giving the DOJ 7 days to turn
over documents owed to Congress.
Rep. Jim Jordan announced Wednesday he will be joining
Chairman Meadows to introduce a resolution that would
give the Justice Department 7 days to turn over documents
owed to Congress.
Jordan then called for an immediate vote on the resolution.
Jim Jordan tweeted: @RepMarkMeadows and I are
introducing a resolution that would give the DOJ seven
days to turn over the documents that they owe Congress.
We need to vote on this immediately.
Rep. Jordan then ripped DAG
Rosenstein for threatening
Congressional staff members. “It’s time
for House Leadership to stand up.”
.
290
Jim Jordan tweeted: Rod Rosenstein threatened
congressional staff. When the bully picks on your little
brother, you have to respond. It’s time for House
Leadership to stand up.
Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein threatened to subpoena
emails, phone records and other
documents of Republican lawmakers on
the House Intel Committee back in
January, confirming previous reports
On Tuesday, Fox News Catherine Herridge reported on
emails obtained memorializing a January 18, closed-door
meeting with DOJ, FBI and House Intel members where
Rosenstein threatened GOP-led staffers if they didn’t stop
their investigation.
Of course the FBI and DOJ are disputing this account and
defending Rosenstein.
The swamp always protects their own.
On Tuesday night Jeff Sessions told Tucker Carlson that
he did not believe Rosenstein threatened Congress.
House Leadership needs to clean house and get rid of
Sessions, Rosenstein and Wray.
 North Korea: Pelosi Versus Peace
By Thomas Knapp
June 13, 2018
Photo by DVIDSHUB | CC BY 2.0
Which is worse: The specter of nuclear war, or giving US
president Donald Trump credit for a significant diplomatic
accomplishment?
In her official statement on Trump’s Singapore summit
with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, US House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi makes it clear that a few million
incinerated human beings are a small price to pay to keep
the 68-year-old Korean War going. Maybe not forever, but
at least until there’s a Democrat in the White House.
“[T]he President handed Kim Jong-un concessions in
exchange for vague promises that do not approach a clear
and comprehensive pathway to denuclearization and non-
proliferation,” Pelosi complains.
What were these dangerous “concessions?”
First, the US armed forces will, conditional upon progress
toward North Korean denuclearization, stop conducting the
threatening military exercises that they’ve conducted on
North Korea’s border and off its coast since the 1953
ceasefire. Some “concession.” If US and South Korean
forces aren’t prepared for a new outbreak of hostilities
after 65 years of training, they never will be.
Secondly, again conditional upon North Korea holding up
its end of the developing bargain, the US will provide
“security guarantees.” Which means, the US and South
Korea won’t invade North Korea, just like they haven’t
.
291
invaded North Korea since 1953. Again, some
“concession.”
Would a Democratic president, at the kind of summit with
North Korea’s ruler that Trump managed to swing —
unlike any past president, Democrat or Republican — have
refused those two obvious first-step “concessions?” Not a
chance. They were the bare minimum, and if a Democrat
had offered them, Pelosi would have publicly celebrated
them as like unto the Second Coming.
“President Trump elevated North Korea to the level of the
United States while preserving the regime’s status quo,”
Pelosi continues, ignoring the fact that every president
since Eisenhower has “preserved the regime’s status quo”
— until Trump, who recognized, diplomatically speaking
and in relation to the issue at hand, that North Korea is
already at “the level of the United States.”
If the Korean War is going to be sorted out, it will be the
belligerents — North Korea, South Korea, China and the
United States, likely with significant input from Russia —
doing the sorting.
But Pelosi, the Democratic Party, and the party’s allies in
the media, would rather it NOT get sorted out.
That’s disgusting.
Posturing America as “the exceptional nation,” Kim as a
supplicant in rags, and those other governments as mere
hangers-on could have had only two possible outcomes.
One was the status quo ante. The other — a danger faced
by then-president Barack Obama in negotiating the Iran
nuclear deal — was those other parties negotiating their
own deal, leaving a petulant, marginalized America to
watch their parade from the sidelines.
A genuine and durable peace on the Korean peninsula may
or may not be achievable, but Trump seems to be giving it
the old college try. Pelosi and her party, having proven
unable to lead and unwilling to follow on the matter,
should at least have the decency to get the hell out of the
way.
 Mark Meadow RIPS AWOL Sessions For Defending
Rosenstein: “I’m Confident He Doesn’t Know What He’s
Talking About” (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 13, 2018, 2:55 Pm

Attorney General Jeff Sessions joined

Tucker Carlson Tuesday night to
discuss the shocking revelation that
Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein threatened members of
Congress.
AWOL AG Jeff Sessions told Tucker
Carlson that he’s “confident”
Rosenstein didn’t threaten members of
Congress.
Rep. Mark Meadows absolutely ripped
Sessions to pieces for defending
Rosenstein.

On Tuesday, Fox News Catherine Herridge reported on

emails obtained memorializing a January 18, closed-door
meeting with DOJ, FBI and House Intel members where
Rosenstein threatened GOP-led staffers if they didn’t stop
their investigation.

Rep Matt Gaetz (R-FL) said on Wednesday morning he

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-NC) saw first hand what Rosenstein’s threats did to
shredded AWOL AG Sessions Tuesday night in an Congressional staff members.
appearance on Fox News’ Ingraham Angle.

“For the Attorney General to say he’s

confident that Rod Rosenstein did
everything right, well I’m confident he
doesn’t know what he’s talking about,”
Meadows said.

Sessions is a disgrace. He recused himself from his duties

the first day on the job and sits in the corner of the DOJ
while Rosenstein and Mueller use KGB tactics to harass
and intimidate President Trump and anyone connected to
him. Reps Meadows and Jim Jordan are set
to introduce a resolution giving the DOJ
VIDEO: 7 days to turn over documents owed to
Congress.
292
 Body Language Expert:
Trump Dominated North Korea Summit
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor
4:28 PM 06/13/2018

Chris Ulrich noted that Kim Jong Un had the upper hand in
the first photo-op with Trump because he was standing on
the left side of the photo, but added that Trump put his
hand on Kim Jong Un’s upper arm during their hand shake
as a way of “reestablishing dominance.”

“Then…Trump does something very

A body language expert who appeared on CNN
Wednesday said that President Donald Trump clearly
dominated North Korea’s Kim Jong Un during their
historic summit.
interesting,” Ulrich said. “He pats [Kim Jong
Un] on the back and guides him out —
again, he’s establishing dominance.”
CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin agreed that it seemed Trump
was “leading” Kim Jong Un and was “in charge.”

WATCH: “It seems to me from these pictures…that

the president is leading him,” Baldwin
argued. “He seems to be in charge in that
situation, it’s almost like they’re at Mar A
Lago or walking out of the boardroom.”

293
 James Clapper Praises Trump
For North Korea Meeting
Amber Athey | Media And Breaking News Editor
4:55 PM 06/13/2018

Former director of national intelligence James Clapper Clapper, who has been incredibly critical of Trump, said
praised President Donald Trump for his efforts in that he gives the president credit for changing the narrative
denuclearizing North Korea. in negotiations with the North Korean regime.

WATCH: “My observation certainly when I was there

was the North Koreans were clearly stuck
on their narrative and we were kind of stuck
on ours,” Clapper said. “Emblematic of that
were the talking points I was assigned to
recite to the North Koreans, first one of
which was ‘you must denuclearize before
we talk to you.’ Well, that’s a nonstarter.”
“President Trump to his credit has changed
that narrative I think…that’s a good thing,”
he asserted.

294
 Mueller Appears To Have Screwed
Up By ‘Accidentally’ Exposing Names In Manafort Case
By Matt Naham
5:17 Pm, June 13th, 2018
Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his team have been
aggressively pursuing former Trump campaign chairman
Paul Manafort, even tacking on new charges
of obstruction of justice due to alleged attempted witness
tampering.
Although Mueller has been tight-lipped about evidence
and witness identification up to this point, his team appears
to have screwed up by outing journalists who “produced
messages to the FBI” about Manafort’s alleged “coaching
up” on lobbying practices. Manafort was indicted in D.C.
back in October 2017 for alleged financial fraud and
violating lobbying disclosure laws. There’s also a case
against him in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA).
“Special Counsel accidentally exposed
names of former journalists and European
politicians allegedly involved in Manafort’s
secret Ukraine lobbying. Just filed a new
version with redactions,” explained
Washington Post reporter Rachel Weiner:
“Unredacted government exhibit showing
alleged attempts by Manafort and Kilimnik
to influence witness testimonies has been
released. The witnesses, journalists […]
produced the messages to the FBI,” the
Atlantic‘s Natasha Bertrand added.
In a later tweet, Bertrand wrote,
295
“Oh boy. Looks like releasing this
unredacted was a mistake–special counsel
has just re-filed this and other docs with
redactions. (Kilimnik’s name is redacted,
too, interestingly.)”
Konstantin Kilimnik was newly named in
the attempted witness tampering indictment
also adds another defendant, who allegedly
worked for Davis Manafort Partners
International and acted in concert with
Manafort and Rick Gates in their work for
the Ukrainian government.
The simplest evidence that there was a screw-up here is
that what was unredacted is now redacted.
In a separate matter under the Mueller Probe umbrella,
Mueller’s prosecutors notably argued Tuesday that
evidence should not be revealed to Russian troll farm case
defendant, Concord Management and Consulting LLC.
Mueller filed a 14-page motion to keep evidence from the
defendant. It makes one wonder why such care was taken
there but not here.
Previously in the D.C. case, Judge Amy Berman Jackson
denied Manafort’s motion to redact search warrant
affidavits because the affidavits in question were irrelevant
or were based on “confidential sources.”
Berman Jackson said some information was being
withheld because in those instances because
“the names of confidential sources who had
provided information to the government”
were involved and because they contained
“information relating to ongoing
investigations that does not bear upon the
allegations in either of the two cases now
pending against Manafort.”
 DENNIS RODMAN: “Obama Wouldn’t
Give Me The Time Of Day, But Trump Is Trump”
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 5:19 Pm

Former Chicago Bulls star Dennis Rodman visited “Barack Obama would not give him the
Singapore this week for the Trump-Kim Jong Un talks. time of day. But Trump is Trump.”

Dennis Rodman has met with Kim Jong Un before in
North Korea. He is also a friend of President Trump.
Dennis Rodman:
He just wouldn’t listen to me at all. I mean,
he was just so trying to be the first black
president ever… ta-da-da-da… Some sh*t
like that… He wouldn’t listen to me. I
begged him to listen to me. I said I just
want to talk to you. I’ll visit the White House
we’ll sit down and talk. He didn’t give me
the time of day. It doesn’t matter. But,
Trump is Trump.

The former Chicago Bulls star Dennis Rodman wore a red

Trump ‘Make America Great Again’ hat during an
emotional interview on CNN with Chris Cuomo Monday
night (Tuesday morning).

At one point Rodman broke into tears as he spoke about

getting death threats and having to hide as a result of his
efforts to bridge the divide between the U.S. and North
Korea.

Dennis Rodman later told a reporter,

296
 .

297
 Salon Finds Psychiatrist
To Diagnose Trump As Insane
By Isaac Cross
June 13, 2018 5:21 PM EDT
Under the law, President Trump might be innocent until
proven guilty, but that has not stopped the left from
diagnosing him insane without a proper evaluation.
On June 13th, the notoriously liberal news site, Salon,
posted an interview with Dr. John Gartner discussing the
state of President Trump’s mental health. In the interview
Dr. Gartner, a former professor of psychiatry at Johns
Hopkins University Medical School and co-editor of
"Rocket Man: Nuclear Madness and the Mind of
Donald Trump," labelled Trump “a madman” and
explained why he believes Trump suffers from “malignant
narcissism.”
Gartner, of course, hasn’t personally evaluated Trump.
Still, he’s sure Trump
“truly doesn't care if he destroys us all. In
fact, there's a part of Trump that would
almost take glee in it.” Gartner added for
good measure, “He's impulsive, he's
erratic, he's seeing the world in a grossly
distorted way.”
How does Gartner know?
298
“Trump tortures anyone who doesn't give
him what he wants.” Oh.
The president, according to the shrink, is in a state of
deterioration. A characteristic of malignant narcissists like
Trump is that
“when they gain power, they become more
inflamed in their grandiosity and in their
paranoia.” In Trump’s case, what many
would see as a show of confidence
expected of a leader, Gartner sees as a
delusion of “papal infallibility.”
Gartner’s concern -- and that of his interviewer Chauncey
DeVega -- also extended to the American populace,
referring to Trump supporters as part of a “cult.” As
Gartner said,
“The cognitive dissonance is such that the
cult members will rationalize anything. For
example, something like 50 percent of
Republicans say that if Trump wanted to
cancel the 2020 election, that would be fine
with them.”
In the poll that he is referencing, out of a pool of 650
people, half of those who identified as republican said they
would support postponing the election.
The interview represented just one more small-minded
attack on Trump. Instead of taking on his policy decisions
in a civilized argument, the media has continually decided
to slander his mental health instead. Since Brian Stelter’s
opinion was not enough, they finally found medical
experts like Dr. Gartner with enough lack of
professionalism to be willing to support their claims.
 Jim Jordan Explodes On
AG Sessions For Defending Rosenstein
Amber Athey | Media And Breaking News Editor
5:38 PM 06/13/2018

A new report revealed that Rosenstein was threatening to

subpoena members of the House Intelligence Committee
and Jordan ripped Sessions for not keeping his underling in
check.

“I’m almost flabbergasted, I mean, what is

House Judiciary member Jim Jordan ripped Attorney
General Jeff Sessions to shreds on Tuesday night after he
defended the actions of Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein.
WATCH:
the attorney general saying?” Jordan said.
“Rod Rosenstein hasn’t complied with
Devin Nunes’ subpoena, hasn’t complied
with Chairman Goodlatte’s subpoena,
we’ve caught them hiding information in the
Strzok-Page text messages.”
“Rod Rosenstein was threatening members
of the House Intelligence Committee for
doing their job, for trying to get answers for
the American people and the attorney
general says ‘that’s okay we’re doing just
fine’?” the Republican congressman
questioned.

“I didn’t know he had said that when you

just played that and I was like, ‘Are you
kidding me?'” Jordan concluded.

299
 Trump Thinks China Shares
Vision On North Korean Nukes
Saagar Enjeti | White House Correspondent
7:21 PM 06/13/2018

Fox News anchor Bret Baier pushed Trump on whether he

believes he is playing into China’s desire by stabilizing the
Korean peninsula and disengaging from the region by
canceling U.S. military exercises after his summit with
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

“No. I think China really would like to see

President Donald Trump believes China shares America’s
goal of a denuclearized Korean peninsula in a preview of
an interview set to air on Fox News Wednesday.
no nuclear weapons you want to know the
truth. Look, whether you are semi friendly
with a nation or not, when they have
nuclear weapons and you are that close, it
can’t be a positive feeling. Just can’t be.
China has been very helpful,” Trump
replied, adding that China may ease its
restrictions on North Korea because it is
upset about U.S. trade policy.

Trump criticized China in recent weeks ahead of his

summit with North Korea questioning why Kim Jong Un’s
tone became more critical of the U.S. after having a secret
meeting with President Xi Jinping.

300
 Sessions Defends Firing Comey,
Warns DoJ Report Could Prompt
More Terminations
By The Hill Staff
06/13/18 08:44 Pm Edt
On the eve of the release of a potentially explosive new
report, Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended the
termination of the FBI’s top two former executives and
warned that the forthcoming report on the FBI's handling
of the Hillary Clinton probe could result in more people
being fired.
In an exclusive interview with The Hill’s new TV show
"Rising," which aired Thursday morning,
Sessions defended the decision to fire ex-Director James
Comey, who he said “made a big mistake” that belied a
“serious breach of discipline.”
Sessions also made clear that he is open to firing more
employees if the Justice Department inspector general’s
soon-to-be-released report warrants it.
“I think it will be a lengthy report and a
careful report,” he told "Rising" co-host
Buck Sexton. “I think it will help us better fix
any problems that we have and reassure
the American people that some of the
concerns that have been raised are not
true.”
“If anyone else shows up in this report to
have done something that requires
termination we will do so,” he added.
.
301
Sessions spoke to “Rising” just hours before DOJ
Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to release
a report on Comey’s handling of the Clinton email case in
2016 and his subsequent firing by President Trump in
2017.
Published reports have said the report concludes Comey
was insubordinate as FBI director when he refused DOJ
advice and announced a re-opening of the Clinton email
case just days before the 2016 general election.
Sessions said he is certain that Comey’s firing was
justified.
“It was the right thing to do. The facts were
pretty clear on it. He made a big mistake
and he testified only a few weeks before
that termination that he would do it again
[announce reopening the Clinton probe] if
he had the opportunity. So we felt like there
was a serious breach of discipline within
the department if we allowed him to
continue.”
Trump has indicated various motives for firing the former
FBI director. The termination was recommended in a
memo written by Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein that referenced Comey's
"handling of the conclusion of the
investigation of Secretary Clinton's emails."
Sessions also said the termination earlier this year of
Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for allegedly lying to
investigators about his media contacts was also “the right
decision.” McCabe's termination resulted from a separate
report from Horowitz charging Comey's former deputy
with unauthorized leaking.
A Perfect Present For The President? Inspector General To
Release Bombshell Report On Clinton Email Case Today
On Trump's Birthday And Is Expected To Point The Blame
At 'Insubordinate' James Comey
 DOJ Inspector General Report, Released Today, Is Expected To Scorch James Comey For Re-
Opening The Clinton Email Probe Days Before The 2016 Election
 The Report Is The Perfect Present For The President Who Celebrates His 72nd Birthday On
Thursday
 White House Official: Comey 'And His Cheap Halo Have Been Wearing The Holier-Than-Thou Act
Pretty Thin, And Nobody Around Here Is Going To Shed A Tear'
 June 18 And 19 Will See Horowitz Testifying In Senate And House Hearings On Capitol Hill
 Report Will Call Comey 'Insubordinate' – Suggesting Attorney General May Have Ordered Him To
Not Tell Congress Until After Election That He Rebooted The Probe
 Also Expected To Be Deeply Critical Of Former AG Loretta Lynch For Meeting Bill Clinton In Secret
While Her Agency Was Deciding Hillary Clinton's Fate In 2016
 The President Said He Hopes The Report Is Not Being 'Made Weaker'
By David Martosko, U.S. Political Editor And Hannah Perry For Dailymail.Com
Published: 23:58 Edt, 13 June 2018 | Updated: 07:06am Edt, 14 June 2018

The long anticipated inspector general's bombshell report

on the Clinton email investigation is expected to point
blame at 'insubordinate' James Comey.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is

releasing the report on Thursday, just in time for the
President Trump's 72nd birthday.

Several top Justice Department and FBI officials are

expected to come under scrutiny in the report, including
Comey, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former
Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and FBI official
Peter Strzok.
The long anticipated inspector general's bombshell report
The Justice Department said IG Horowitz will testify in a on the Clinton email investigation is released today - and is
public hearing on June 18. House Judiciary Committee expected to point the blame at 'insubordinate' James
members will get their chance to quiz Horowitz a day later. Comey

The result could be a flurry of written demands for public

testimony – from Comey and former attorney general
Loretta Lynch – and then even more explosive testimony
in public from both former top-shelf Obama administration
luminaries.

Horowitz's report is widely expected to criticize Comey

and other senior leaders for their handling of the
investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of
classified information while she was secretary of state.

302
President Donald Trump will turn 72 on June 14, and his
present is the report from the Justice Department's
inspector general that is expected to excoriate his nemesis,
fired FBI director James Comey
Of particular interest is Comey's bombshell announcement
two weeks before the 2016 election that the agency was
reopening the Clinton email probe after stumbling upon
the new material. It wasn't until two days before the
election that the FBI announced, for a second time, it
would not recommend criminal charges against Clinton.

Horowitz wrote to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman

Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, saying that his long-
awaited report is released today and he'll follow up with
public testimony four days later

The Office of Inspector General report is also expected to

The president asked this week why Michael Horowitz, the
Justice Department's inspector general, hadn't completed
his report by the end of May as scheduled, but he's
promised members of Congress that he'll be on Capitol
Hill soon to testify about it
criticize Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, two FBI officials who
exchanged vicious text messages about Trump during the
course of the Clinton investigation and the presidential
campaign. Strzok was later tasked to work on Special
Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of unproven links between
the Trump campaign and agents of the Kremlin.

The Trump White House is still reeling from the months-

long public relations blitz associated with Comey's self-
laudatory book, 'A Higher Loyalty,' which painted Trump
as an integrity-compromised villain and cast Comey as the
unfairlly deposed carrier of America's moral torch.

The West Wing is holding its collective breath, hoping for

a spanking heard 'round the world.

'When will people start saying, “thank you,

Mr. President, for firing James Comey?”'
the president tweeted Thursday.
'Comey is eventually going to get what's
coming to him, so it may as well be soon,'
one White House official said Thursday. The Trump White House is still reeling from the public
relations blitz associated with Comey's book, and some in
the West Wing are itching for revenge
The official said the fired FBI director
In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck
'and his cheap halo have been wearing the
Grassley, an Iowa Republican, Horowitz wrote that '[p]rior
holier-than-thou act pretty thin, and nobody
to the June 18 hearing, the OIG intends to release our
around here is going to shed a tear if he's
report publicly and to provide the report's classified
brought down a peg. Or a few hundred.'
appendix to our oversight committees.'

Among the report's findings already leaked to the press:

'We will release the report as soon as we
Comey was 'insubordinate,' Lynch jeopardized the
complete the OIG's ordinary processes for
impartiality of the DOJ by meeting secretly with former
the review and classification of such
president Bill Clinton while his wife's fate hung in the
reports ... Most of this process is now
balance, and that the FBI didn't move quickly enough to
complete, and we anticipate releasing the
review a trove of emails found late in the 2016 campaign.
report on June 14, 2018.'

Those emails were found on a laptop belonging to

The report is expected to be especially brutal to Comey for
disgraced former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the now-jailed ex-
telling Congress, barely a week before the 2016 election,
husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
that he was reopening a dormant probe into classified
material nestled among other files on Clinton's private
email server.
303
ABC News reported that Horowitz will brand Comey
'insubordinate,' a word suggesting Lynch may have
ordered him not to tell Congress that he had rebooted the
investigation, a move that made voters aware of his
decision and likely had political consequences.
304
Lynch's transgression appears to be her declaration that she
would accept the advice of the FBI – which ultimately
recommended no prosecution – shortly after she convened
a secret meeting with former president Bill Clinton on an
airport tarmac.
Former attorney general Loretta Lynch will be under the
inspector general's microscope, reportedly for announcing
just after a secret meeting with Bill Clinton that she
wouldn't intervene in deciding whether to charge Hillary
with a crime
Clinton maintained a private, home-brew email server for
her communications while she was secretary of state, and
classified material was found on it; Comey cleared her of
criminal wrongdoing in July 2016 but rebooted the probe
in October, a move that she has said doomed her
presidential hopes
That episode raised deep suspicions about whether she was
putting her thumb on the scales of justice to help the
Clintons, although both insisted they didn't speak about the
then-Democratic presidential candidate's email scandal.
The late-October 2016 restart of the Hillary Clinton probe
came after a tranche of her emails were discovered on a
laptop belonging to disgraced former Democratic
congressman Anthony Weiner.
Weiner was married to Huma Abedin, Clinton's deputy
campaign manager, from whose account the emails were
forwarded.
Sending the letter to Congress broke with longstanding
DOJ policy not to take actions that could interfere with
political processes, according to ABC.
The network's anchor George Stephanopoulos asked
Comey in April: 'If Attorney General Lynch had ordered
you not to send the letter, would you have sent it?'
'No. I believe in the chain of command,' he replied.
305
Trump asked this week why it was 'taking so long' for the
Justice Department's IG to complete his report, details of
which have begun to dribble out to the press
PRESSURE: The president said he hoped the report wasn't
being made 'weaker' – a possible reference to the 'comment
period' where the Justice Department and FBI get the
chance to make comments or dispute conclusions
President Donald Trump put public pressure on the
inspector general this week to finish the report, and said he
hoped it wasn't being made 'weaker.'
The IG was originally scheduled to complete its findings
by the end of May.
'What is taking so long with the Inspector
General’s Report on Crooked Hillary and
Slippery James Comey,' Trump tweeted
this week.
'Numerous delays. Hope Report is not
being changed and made weaker! There
are so many horrible things to tell, the
public has the right to know. Transparency!'
There has been no indication that Trump has seen the
report ahead of its release.
Amid growing interest in the report, the Senate Judiciary
Committee last week gave notice that it would hold a
hearing titled: 'Examining the Inspector General’s First
Report on Justice Department Decisions Regarding the
2016 Presidential Election.'
It pushed the hearing back a week, from its original date of
June 5 to June 12.
'We are not going to hold the hearing until
the report comes out,' said a Judiciary
panel spokesman on Monday.
Horowitz told a House Oversight hearing late last year his
office was
'aiming to release the report in late
winter/early spring — hopefully in that
March/April time period.'
One person the IG interviewed in the course of his
investigation was Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who on
Sunday said he provided satisfactory assurances that he did
not have inside information on the FBI reopening the
Clinton email investigation.
Asked if he expected to be identified in the report as
getting leaked information from the FBI, Giuliani told
NBC's 'Meet the Press':
'Oh no, no, absolutely not. No. Impossible.
I didn't get any leaked information from the
F.B.I.'
Giuliani said he had
'no idea that Weiner was involved in this at
all. Had no idea they were going to reopen
it.'
Giuliani in advance of the FBI's surprise move had touted
'some pretty big surprise,' telling Fox News: 'You'll see.'
He told NBC he was referring to a major TV ad buy,
'where we were going to buy a tremendous amount of time
unlike anything we had ever done before.' He says he was
able to 'show them a memo, a contemporaneous memo I
have' about it.
Asked by host Chuck Todd if he had a heads-up, Giuliani
replied: 'Right, no heads up. I had a speculation.'
306
HOW THE RELEASE OF THE I.G. REPORT WILL
LIKELY PLAY OUT
WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL SAY
The president has depicted the former FBI director as
a renegade who breaks protocol, nicknaming him
"Slippery James Comey."
That portrayal serves a keen political purpose:
undercutting the ongoing Russia probe, since taken
over by special counsel Robert Mueller. That probe
includes a look at whether Trump himself tried to
obstruct justice by firing Comey.
Any IG investigation challenging Comey's work as
FBI director could bolster Trump's argument that he
did the right thing by pushing Comey out. It also
brings the debate back to Clinton's email server.
"When will people start saying, "thank you, Mr.
President, for firing James Comey?" Trump tweeted
Thursday.
He'll also likely point to an earlier inspector general
report that accused Comey's deputy, Andrew
McCabe, of misleading internal investigators about a
news media disclosure.
But what if the report doesn't go far enough for
Trump? He's already floated the idea that the
findings could be watered down and that's why it
hasn't been released. Trump seemed pleased
Thursday, though, following an ABC News report that
the IG could use the term "insubordinate" to describe
Comey.
"It is all a Democrat Excuse for LOSING the
Election," Trump tweeted Thursday of the Russia
probe. "Where is the server?"
WHAT DEMOCRATS WILL SAY
Democrats already blame Comey for his handling of
the Clinton investigation because they say it broke
with longstanding bureau protocol not to insert itself
into politics.
Robby Mook, Clinton's former campaign manager, at
one point declared "his credibility is gone" in
reference to Comey after the election. But Mook and
other Democrats were also in disbelief after Trump
fired Comey.
"Twilight zone," Mook tweeted at the time. "I was as
disappointed and frustrated as anyone at how the
 email investigation was handled. But this terrifies
me."
It's likely Democrats will search the IG report for
justification that Comey's handling of the email
investigation was clumsy. But they'll also probably
argue Trump really fired Comey because of his
agency's Russia probe and Comey's refusal to
publicly say the president himself wasn't under
investigation.
WHAT JAMES COMEY WILL SAY
Comey has said he knew it would be unorthodox to
alert Congress to a discovery of emails potentially
connected to the Clinton case just 11 days before
Americans picked a new president.
307
But while that option was "really bad," concealing the
new information would be "catastrophic," considering
he had testified under oath that the investigation was
finished. He has said he felt compelled to advise
them that was no longer the case.
It's not clear how Comey will respond to the report,
but on Tuesday, he tweeted that "facts" have a way
of winning out.
"It can take a while, but decency and the rule of law
inevitably win over demagogues and liars," he said.
– Associated Press
 Norwegian Politicians Nominate
President Trump For Nobel Peace Prize
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 7:46 Am
In March President Donald Trump was nominated for the
2017 Nobel Peace Prize for his ‘peace through strength
ideology’.
This followed his progress on the North Korean missile
crisis.
In April President Trump held a rally with supporters in
Michigan.
They started chanting “Nobel! Nobel!”
308
President Donald Trump was officially nominated for a
Nobel Peace Prize by a group of 18 Republican members
of Congress in May.
Now this…
Two Norwegian lawmakers nominated
President Donald Trump for the Nobel
Peace Prize following the Singapore
Summit with Kim Jong-Un.
Sky.com reported:
Donald Trump has been nominated for the
Nobel Peace Prize by two Norwegian
politicians after his historic meeting with
Kim Jong Un.
Christian Tybring-Gjedde, an MP, and
former justice minister Per-Willy Amundsen
said Mr. Trump “had taken a huge and
important step in the direction of the
disarmament, peace and reconciliation
between North and South Korea”.
Both men are politicians with the anti-
establishment Progress Party.
 Shocking Details In IG Report Reveal James Comey,
Peter Strzok And FBI Agents Plotted
TREASON Against America
By Mike Adams
06/14/2018
Stunning details from the newly-released IG investigative
report — download from the DOJ here — reveal a pattern
of treason against the United States of America by
James Comey, Peter Strzok and other deep state operatives
inside the FBI and DOJ.
Among other bombshell findings, the IG report revealed
that FBI agent Peter Strzok actively plotted to “stop”
Trump from becoming President. Furthermore, that
admission by Strzok was surreptitiously deleted from the
texts the FBI previously handed over the Congress,
demonstrating yet again that the FBI is engaged in a
massive cover-up to hide its own role in committing
treason against America. (The FBI, in other words, is
engaged in obstruction of justice to cover up its own
criminal behavior.)
James Come used illegal, secret Gmail
account to conduct FBI business
The report also finds that treasonous deep state actor James
Comey used an illegal, secret email account on Gmail to
conduct official FBI business, mirroring the criminal
actions of Hillary Clinton who violated national security
laws by operating her own secret email server. When
Congress issued a subpoena for the tens of thousands of
emails on Clinton’s server, she ordered them all
destroyed. James Comey then covered up for Hillary’s
crimes by publicly exonerating her for acts that clearly
meet the definition of obstruction of justice.
309
For his part, Peter Strzok was instrumental in the entire
deep state conspiracy to overthrow the 2016 election and
carry out a political coup in America, which is a crime of
treason. Rep. Trey Gowdy sounded off on the findings
today, issuing a press release stating:
[Peter Strzok’s] bias was so pervasive and
toxic as to call into question any other
investigations he was part of including his
role in the investigation of what Russia did
in 2016… His bias impacted his decision-
making and he assigned to himself the role
of stopping the Trump campaign or ending
a Trump presidency. The FBI’s actions and
those of former director Comey severely
damaged the credibility of the investigation,
the public’s ability to rely on the results of
the investigation, and the very institutions
he claims to revere.
FBI agents sold out America for free food and concert
tickets
In addition, we’ve also learned that FBI agents traded
leaks for free food and tickets to social events, handed out
by conspiring members of the corporate-run media. In
other words, the media was colluding with the FBI to
overthrow the United States of America by bribing FBI
agents, who sold out their country for little more than
meals and event tickets. (Read FBIcorruption.news to stay
informed.) As the IG report states:
[We have] identified numerous FBI
employees, at all levels of the organization
and with no official reason to be in contact
with the media, who were nevertheless in
frequent contact with reporters… [FBI
agents were] improperly receiving benefits
from reporters, including tickets to sporting
events, golfing outings, drinks and meals,
and admittance to nonpublic social events.
In other words, the FBI was actively committing treason
and got caught. James Comey ran the entire operation. Yet
to this day, he remains in such a state of denial about the
rule of law that he continues to claim he did nothing will lose any remaining faith in the
wrong. institution of federal government.

The consequences for treason include This, in turn, will lead to secession, civil war or other
the death penalty extreme outcomes that ultimately spell the end of America
as we know it. After all, if the federal government is
clearly run by criminals and policed by criminals who
While I support everyone’s right to a fair trial and a
exonerate all their deep state buddies from serious crimes,
competent defense, it’s becoming increasingly clear that a
why should the American people believe anything the
long list of individuals inside the FBI and DOJ need to be
government does (or says) at all?
indicted and charged with treason. If found guilty in a
court of law, one of the penalties for treason is the death
penalty. We are facing a “do-or-die” moment for the future of this
nation. We either hold these deep state criminals
accountable for their crimes, or America is lost forever.
Through their actions, conspirators like James Comey and
Peter Strzok have not only proven they are unfit to serve
the American people; they are very likely going to face Watch my video for full details:
serious criminal indictment for their attempted conspiracy
to overthrow the United States of America. Their acts of
treason carry severe consequences, and We the People are
beyond “fed up” with a two-tiered justice system where
crooks in Washington D.C. seem to get away with
everything and face no consequences for their crimes. It’s
time to hold these people accountable for their failed coup
attempt and charge them with the crime they committed:
TREASON.

If the FBI and DOJ fail to clean out the

deep state operatives who deliberately
acted to subvert our democracy and nullify
an election of the People, then America
.

310
 BREAKING: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Responds To CBS
Report On Her ‘Plans To Leave The White House’
By Cristina Laila
June 13, 2018, 8:05 Pm

BREAKING NEWS.
CBS also claimed,
CBS reported Wednesday afternoon
Press Secretary Sarah Sanders was
planning to leave her position at the “there will be more people leaving the
White House by the end of 2018. White House sooner rather than later…”

Principal Deputy Press Secretary, Raj
Shah is also planning on departing the
White House, however; the exact date of
his exit is unknown at this time,
according to CBS.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders replaced Sean Spicer as Press
Secretary last July after briefly serving as the Principal
Deputy Press Secretary.
Sanders, like Sean Spicer took a tremendous amount of
liberal abuse by the snakes in the press pool.

She did a great job putting the liberal reporters in their

place.

Shortly after the CBS report was

published, Sarah Huckabee Sanders
fired off a tweet in response.

Sarah Sanders tweeted:

Does @CBSNews know something I

CBS reported: don’t about my plans and my future? I
was at my daughter’s year-end
Press secretary Sarah Sanders and Kindergarten event and they ran a story
principal deputy press secretary Raj Shah about my “plans to leave the WH”
are both heading for the exits, according to without even talking to me. I love my job
sources inside the White House and close and am honored to work for @POTUS
to the administration. Sanders, who has
become a confidante of President Trump
since the departure of former
communications director Hope Hicks, has
told friends that she plans to leave the
administration at the end of the year.
Shah is also considering his exit, but he
has not yet settled on an exact date.
Neither Sanders nor Shah immediately
responded to repeated requests for
comment.
This story is developing…
.

311
 Don Trump Jr. On Mueller Witch Hunt: I Don’t Trust
These People – My Father Should Not Sit
Down With Them (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 8:12 Am

Donald Trump Jr. went on FOX and Friends on Thursday

to discuss his father’s very successful meeting with Kim
Jong Un in Singapore and the continued Mueller witch
hunt against the president.
During the conversation Don Jr. was asked if he thinks his
father should sit down with Dirty Cop Mueller.
Donald Trump Jr.:
Look, I don’t trust these people as far as I
could throw them. I wouldn’t sit down with
them because you could sit there and ask
questions for 50 hours or 100 hours and
ask the same thing 1000 times and they
would be, “Oh, the comma’s different here.
Now we got you!” The reality is the greatest
investigative bodies in the world have been
looking at this for two year. Two years! And
they have come up with nothing. By the
way the only thing they’ve come up with is
what they themselves were doing!

Via FOX and Friends:

Brian Kilmeade:

Rudy told Laura Ingraham last night, we

are going to decide in the next couple
weeks whether the president sits down. If
your dad asks you what he should do what
do you tell him?

312
 Mueller Files Request For
150 Blank Subpoenas In Manafort Case
By Cristina Laila
June 13, 2018, 9:59 Pm
Shut it down.
On Wednesday, Special Counsel Robert
Mueller filed a request for 150 blank
subpoenas in the Eastern District of
Virginia, where former Trump campaign
Chair Paul Manafort resides.
Blank subpoenas allow Mueller’s team
to fill in names later as long as it is done
before the subpoenas are served.
Manafort is facing federal tax and bank
fraud charges in a Virginia court
stemming from his bail package.
The Washington Examiner reported:
Special counsel Robert Mueller on
Wednesday filed a request for 150 blank
subpoenas in the Eastern District of
Virginia, where former Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort lives.
The two-page filing reveals little, but says
that that each subpoena recipient must
appear in the Alexandria, Va., courthouse
on July 25 to testify in the case.
Judge T.S. Ellis III has now moved the trial
date twice, first from July 10 to July 24, and
then from that date to July 25.
The 150 blank subpoenas amount to 75
total possible subpoenas — in each case, a
subpoena is needed for the witness and
another is needed for the defense. Court
documents filed in April show that Mueller’s
team was pushing to subpoena 35
witnesses in the trial.
313
The document says each recipient “must
also bring with you the following
documents, electronically stored
information or objects” — but what follows
that line is under seal.
As previously reported, Robert Mueller
sought 70 blank subpoenas in the
Manafort case on May 3rd, according to
a court filing.
Paul Manafort was hit with another
indictment by Robert Mueller Friday for
‘witness tampering,’ after his iCloud
account was raided.
Trump’s former campaign manager,
Paul Manafort is battling Mueller in
court.
Paul Manafort first made arguments in a suit with Robert
Mueller, Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions as Head of the
DOJ, related to illegalities in the way that Rosenstein set
up the Mueller special counsel. Rosenstein’s special
counsel order was not based on a crime and
unconstitutionally stated that Mueller could basically look
at anything he wanted to look at. These provisions are
against the law and are now for the courts to settle.
In addition to the above suit, Robert Barnes recently wrote
at Law and Crimes that Mueller’s actions not related to the
2016 campaign are outside the scope of Jeff Sessions
recusal as AG and therefore unconstitutional.
In early April, Mueller and Rosenstein presented to the
courts a rebuttal for Manafort’s latest action – they
presented a previously undisclosed memo to a federal
court in Washington supposedly addressing Manafort’s
argument. The problem is it doesn’t.
The memo is dated August 2, 2017 and is from Rosenstein
to Mueller supposedly directing Mueller to look into
Manafort actions with a Russian operative perhaps before
2016. This however is clearly outside the scope of
Sessions’ recusal as argued by Manafort and doesn’t even
address Manafort’s argument that these actions are not for
Mueller to take or Rosenstein to order but are Sessions
actions alone as AG.
Mueller and Rosenstein are out of control. The witch hunt
must be shut down.
 Rep. Matt Gaetz: We Need To Impeach Rod Rosenstein!
If We Don’t Defend Our Institution
Then What Good Is Congress? (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 10:12 Pm

GOP Representatives Ron DeSantis, Jim Jordan and Matt the bias then they’re threatened by Rod
Gaetz joined joined Sean Hannity on Wednesday night to Rosenstein? This is outrageous. Kash
discuss the shocking development that Deputy Attorney Patel was in my office concerned for the
General Rod Rosenstein threatened Congressional staffers. fact that he as a staff member was doing
his job and then somehow had a different
Earlier on the show Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) told Sean branch of government bringing these
that Rod Rosenstein threatened three staffers in his threats upon him…
presence and he suspects several more were threatened. Look, I’m sick and tired of Rod
Rosenstein’s games. I think we need to
impeach Rosenstein. He won’t turn over
documents. He signed a FISA renewal
against the President of the United
States. And frankly if we don’t step up
and defend our institution then what
good is the Congress anyway?

Via Hannity:

Rep. Matt Gaetz urged Congress to

impeach Rosenstein.

Matt Gaetz:

Sean Rod Rosenstein is intractably

conflicted in this investigation. And as
brave patriots like Kash Patel work hard for
the Congress to expose the corruption and
.

314
 First Leaks On IG Report: Comey Broke From FBI
Procedures But “No Political Bias”
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 10:18 Am
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
informed lawmakers weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 400
page report on the FBI’s handling of
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation
entered the final stages.
Lawyers for the subjects included in the report were given
a draft copy to prepare rebuttals for their clients which is
what partially led to delays in releasing the report to the
public.
The report will be released today at 3 PM.
President Trump will see a copy of the report at noon.
The first leaks on the report say James
Comey broke from FBI procedures when
he delivered his report publicly on the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Hillary broke several rules, laws and
regulations but was not found guilty for
her actions.
It was a sham investigation by the FBI
and DOJ.
The report will be released later today.
The first leaks say Comey broke from FBI procedure but
was not politically biased.
What a joke. It is obvious to anyone
paying attention that James Comey has
a deep-seated hatred of Donald Trump.
Bloomberg reported:
315
Former FBI Director James Comey
“deviated” from FBI and Justice
Department procedures in handling the
probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the law
enforcement agencies’ image of impartiality
even though he wasn’t motivated by
political bias, the department’s watchdog
found in a highly anticipated report.
“While we did not find that these decisions
were the result of political bias on Comey’s
part, we nevertheless concluded that by
departing so clearly and dramatically from
FBI and department norms, the decisions
negatively impacted the perception of the
FBI and the department as fair
administrators of justice,” Inspector
General Michael Horowitz said in the
report’s conclusions, which were obtained
Thursday by Bloomberg News.
Horowitz’s report examined actions taken
by top officials before the 2016 election,
including the handling of the investigation
into Clinton’s use of a private email server
when she was secretary of state. The
investigation expanded to touch on an
array of politically sensitive decisions by
officials including Comey and former
Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Read the rest after this article.
But it wasn’t political?
 Comey Broke From FBI Procedures
In Clinton Probe, Watchdog Finds
ByChris Strohm
June 14, 2018, 9:07 AM CDT Updated On June 14, 2018, 10:57 AM CDT

Why Mueller Is One Contestant Trump Can’t Easily Fire:

A QuickTake

Some of what Horowitz discovered has

already been made public, and Trump and
Republican lawmakers have pounced on
those findings in an effort to discredit
Comey and, by extension, the investigation
now being run by Special Counsel Robert
Mueller.

In tweets, Trump has called Comey’s investigation into

Former FBI Director James Comey “deviated” from Clinton “phony and dishonest” and said that Comey, who
bureau and Justice Department procedures in handling the he fired on May 9, 2017, left the FBI’s reputation in
probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the agencies’ image tatters.
of impartiality even though he wasn’t motivated by
politics, the department’s watchdog found in a highly Hogan Gidley, a White House spokesman, told reporters
anticipated report. Thursday that he hadn’t yet seen the inspector general’s
report and “I’m not going to get ahead of any of that.”
“While we did not find that these decisions
were the result of political bias on Comey’s Trump’s Interest
part, we nevertheless concluded that by
departing so clearly and dramatically from Trump has expressed great interest in the inspector
FBI and department norms, the decisions general’s report, as well as some skepticism it might not be
negatively impacted the perception of the as damning as he hoped.
FBI and the department as fair
administrators of justice,” Inspector
“What is taking so long with the Inspector
General Michael Horowitz said in the
General’s Report on Crooked Hillary and
report’s conclusions, which were obtained
Slippery James Comey,” Trump tweeted on
by Bloomberg News.
June 5. “Numerous delays. Hope Report is
not being changed and made weaker!
Although the report being sent to Congress on Thursday There are so many horrible things to tell,
doesn’t deal with the origins of the probe into Russia the public has the right to know.
meddling in the 2016 U.S. election and possible collusion Transparency!”
with those around President Donald Trump, the president
and his Republican allies in Congress were primed to seize
Tracking Trump: Follow the Administration’s Every Move
on it as evidence of poor judgment and anti-Trump bias
within the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice
Department. Among topics the inspector general reviewed was
Comey’s announcement in July 2016 that no prosecutor
would find grounds to pursue criminal charges against
Horowitz examined actions taken by top officials before
Clinton for improperly handling classified information on
the 2016 election, including the handling of the
her private email server, as well as Comey’s decision to
investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server
inform Congress only days before the election that the
when she was secretary of state. The inquiry expanded to
Clinton investigation was being re-opened. Comey’s
touch on an array of politically sensitive decisions by
public announcement of findings angered Republicans,
officials including Comey and former Attorney General
while his reopening of the inquiry outraged Democrats.
Loretta Lynch.

316
 “This finding could have been reached the
day of Comey’s press conference,” Brian
Fallon, who was spokesman for Clinton’s
presidential campaign, said Thursday. “It
was obvious at the time that Comey was
completely deviating from department
protocols and it had a fateful impact on the
2016 campaign and the long-term
reputation of the FBI.”
Representatives Jerrold Nadler and Elijah Cummings, the
top Democrats on the House Judiciary and Oversight
committees, said in a statement that
“the stark conclusion we draw after
reviewing this report is that the FBI’s
actions helped Donald Trump become
president.”
Republican members of Congress said they wanted to read
the report before commenting.
Anti-Trump Texts
Republican critics seized on previous revelations from the
inspector general that two FBI officials who worked on
Mueller’s Russia investigation, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page,
exchanged text messages sharply critical of Trump.
Mueller removed Strzok from the inquiry after the texts
were discovered, and Page has since left the FBI.
One example cited in the new report is an email exchange
between Strzok and Page on Aug. 8, 2016. Page
questioned whether Trump would become president.
Strzok replied:
“No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
But Horowitz said in the report to be issued Thursday that
“we did not find documentary or testimonial
evidence that improper considerations,
including political bias, directly affected the
specific investigative actions we reviewed.”
Still, he wrote that “the conduct by these
employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI
investigation.”
Comey-Lynch Criticism
Horowitz found a “troubling lack of any direct, substantive
communication” between Comey and Attorney General
.
317
Lynch ahead of Comey’s July 5 press conference on
Clinton and his October 28 letter to Congress.
“We found it extraordinary that, in advance
of two such consequential decisions, the
FBI director decided that the best course of
conduct was to not speak directly and
substantively with the attorney general
about how best to navigate those
decisions.”
Lynch had announced that she would go along with
whatever Comey recommended with regard to the Clinton
case, although she didn’t formally recuse herself. Lynch
had come under heated criticism for agreeing to meet with
former President Bill Clinton in June 2016 on her plane
while it was sitting on a tarmac in Phoenix. The two sides
have said they didn’t discuss anything related to the
investigation.
The inspector general released a report in April finding
that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe
lacked candor on four different occasions regarding
interactions with the media, including providing
information to a news reporter about the FBI’s
investigation into the foundation created by Hillary and
Bill Clinton. The inspector general has referred the matter
to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia for further
investigation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions relied on the report to fire
McCabe only hours before he was set to retire and qualify
for his full government pension. McCabe and his lawyer
have adamantly contested the allegations.
Sessions said before the inspector general’s latest report
was released that
“if anyone else shows up in this report to
have done something that requires
termination we will do so.”
The attorney general said in an interview with The Hill
that he expected “a careful report” that will “help us better
fix any problems that we have and reassure the American
people that some of the concerns that have been raised are
not true.”
The inspector general also has opened a separate review
into whether the Justice Department and FBI followed
appropriate procedures in obtaining a secret warrant to
conduct surveillance on former Trump campaign aide
Carter Page in late 2016 and early 2017.
 The Long-Awaited Inspector General Report
On The FBI, Comey, Clinton, And 2016, Explained
Michael Horowitz Is An Obama Appointee Who Started This Review Long Ago.
But Trump Hopes To Use His Findings To Discredit Comey.
By Andrew Prokopandrew@Vox.Com
Updated Jun 14, 2018, 10:42am EDT
A hotly anticipated inspector general report about then-FBI
Director James Comey’s handling of the Hillary Clinton
email investigation is finally complete. It’s set to be
released to Congress Thursday afternoon — and is
guaranteed to become a lightning rod in President Trump’s
clashes with his own Justice Department.
We’re still awaiting the full text, but Chris Strohm of
Bloomberg News reports that the IG’s conclusions include
the following:
1) Comey’s actions in the Clinton case departed “clearly
and dramatically from FBI and department norms” and
hurt the “perception of the FBI” — but they weren’t the
result of “political bias.”
2) Specifically, it was not Comey’s job to publicly proclaim
what a “reasonable prosecutor” should do in the Clinton
case — the FBI is supposed to investigate, while the
Justice Department makes charging decisions.
3) Texts between affair-having FBI officials Peter Strzok
and Lisa Page did have political bias, but the IG found
no evidence that “improper considerations” affected
their investigative actions in the Clinton case.
Michael Horowitz, the inspector general writing the report,
is an Obama appointee, and when he first announced he
was reviewing the DOJ and FBI’s actions all the way back
in January 2017, many Clinton supporters eagerly hoped
he would take Comey to task for actions that they felt
inappropriately affected the presidential election.
But we now live in a world where former FBI Director
James Comey is a prominent critic of Trump and an
important witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s
investigation of whether the president obstructed justice.
Even though Horowitz’s report isn’t about the Russia
investigation at all, it will be released in a political context
dominated by both Mueller’s probe and Trump’s attacks
on his Justice Department. Indeed, Trump has recently
signaled that he’s eagerly anticipating the IG report, since
it was expected to criticize Comey, and he is trying to
undermine Comey’s credibility.
318
What is taking so long with the Inspector
General’s Report on Crooked Hillary and
Slippery James Comey. Numerous delays.
Hope Report is not being changed and
made weaker! There are so many horrible
things to tell, the public has the right to
know. Transparency!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
June 5, 2018
However, commentators on all sides of the political
spectrum had — and still have — reasonable complaints
about Comey’s unusual choices during the 2016 campaign.
Horowitz has spent six years in the IG job, has a good
reputation, and is by all appearances nonpartisan.
Furthermore, the inspector general operates with a measure
of independence from government higher-ups. Now he’s
about to walk into the most dangerous political maelstrom
he’s faced yet. But to understand the new report, you have
to first understand the inspector general role — and
Horowitz himself.
What is an inspector general?
Often called the “watchdog” for the federal government,
an inspector general is supposed to investigate allegations
of misconduct within his or her particular agency. Each
major Cabinet department has one, and so do various other
federal offices and agencies — there are 73 inspectors
general (or IGs) in total. (This helpful CRS report lists
them all.)
When inspector general offices were first established in the
mid-1970s, their primary task was to investigate “waste,
fraud, and abuse” in federal spending, and that remains an
important part of their job today.
But gradually, their authority has expanded to the point
where IGs have become all-purpose scandal investigators.
It’s become understood that when something controversial
goes down at an agency, it’s the IG — who’s outside the
normal chain of command — that’s supposed to look into
it. IGs can start investigations based on whistleblower
complaints, referrals from their office’s leadership, or
requests from Congress.
A department’s IG has the authority to examine relevant
records from the department, from memos to emails. IGs
have subpoena power and can arrange interviews of
current employees — interviews in which it would be a
crime to make false statements. So their investigations
have the potential to be quite vigorous.
Yet one crucial thing to understand is that inspectors
general have no authority to actually charge anyone with
crimes (or indeed, to impose any disciplinary actions).
Their investigations end when they assemble reports on
what they found. These reports, which are generally made
public, can recommend that people be prosecuted, but
actual charging decisions are left to elsewhere in the
Justice Department.
The most prominent IGs are all presidential appointees
who have to be confirmed by the Senate. However, the
offices do have a reputation for independence. Though the
president can fire them so long as he tells Congress why in
advance, in recent decades that’s rarely been done. Instead,
IGs are generally (though not always) left in place and get
to serve until they choose to move on.
Trump has so far abided by that tradition. Nearly all of the
most prominent inspectors general are still holdovers from
the Obama or even George W. Bush administrations. They
include the IGs for State, Treasury, Defense, Health and
Human Services, the Environmental Protection Agency,
Veterans Affairs — and Justice Department Inspector
General Michael Horowitz.
Who is Michael Horowitz?
DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Tom Williams/CQ Roll
Call/Getty
319
By now, Trump has cleared out most of the Justice
Department’s Obama-era leadership — but Inspector
General Michael Horowitz remains.
Horowitz has deep roots in the department. From 1991 to
1999, he worked as an assistant US attorney in Justice’s
prestigious Southern District of New York office, where he
led a major investigation into police corruption. He was
then promoted to higher-level roles in the main Justice
Department’s criminal division — first as deputy assistant
attorney general and then as the division chief of staff. In
2002, he left the government and spent the next decade as
a partner at the law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
(where he was well-compensated).
When the Justice Department’s well-respected Inspector
General Glenn Fine decided to resign after a decade in the
post, President Obama decided to nominate Horowitz to
replace him. With congressional Republicans already
demanding various investigations into the Obama
administration, Horowitz was likely picked because he was
a nonpartisan figure who’d worked under presidents of
both parties. The Senate confirmed him without objection
in the spring of 2012.
Horowitz has served in the post in the six years since. In
that time, he’s overseen investigations into politically
charged matters like “Fast and Furious,” the mishandled
operation to infiltrate a weapons-smuggling ring in which
law enforcement officials allowed hundreds of weapons to
be smuggled into Mexico. (Horowitz’s report criticized 14
officials for mishandling the matter.)
He’s occasionally clashed with Justice and FBI leadership,
publicly criticizing them for failing to turn over records on
grand jury investigations relevant to his probes. And he’s
become a sort of champion for the IGs themselves,
chairing a council of inspectors general and asking
Congress to give IGs more investigative powers.
Overall, Horowitz is viewed as a vigorous investigator
who takes his job quite seriously. He generally isn’t
believed to have political motivations — his only known
donation is to Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) in 2010.
“Straight shooter” is one of the most common phrases used
to describe him. But now he’s been tasked with his most
hot-button investigation yet.
What is this IG report about?
On January 12, 2017 — after Trump had won the election
but before his inauguration — Horowitz announced that he
was opening “a review of allegations regarding certain
actions” by the Justice Department and FBI “in advance of
the 2016 election.”
By that, he meant, mainly, officials’ handling of the now-
closed Hillary Clinton email probe, and not the probe of
the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. (The latter
investigation hadn’t even been publicly confirmed to exist
at the time and is still ongoing even today.)
To recap the infamous chain of events in the Clinton
probe: When it emerged in 2015 that Clinton had used a
personal email account on a private server for all of her
emails while she was secretary of state, the Justice
Department launched an investigation into whether she had
mishandled classified information. Eventually, in a
decision Comey says was unanimous among his
investigative team, the FBI privately concluded that it
wouldn’t recommend any charges in the matter.
But by the summer of 2016, the case had become
enormously politically charged, with GOP nominee-in-
waiting Donald Trump repeatedly claiming the
investigation would result in Clinton’s indictment. And
after word leaked out that Attorney General Loretta Lynch
and Bill Clinton had met on an airport tarmac in late June,
Republicans claimed the fix was in.
So on July 5, 2016, Comey bypassed Justice Department
leadership to make a highly unusual public statement in
which he announced that though he believed Clinton had
been “extremely careless” in her email practices, he would
not recommend any charges in the case. Republicans
blasted him for his conclusion that charges weren’t
necessary, while some Democrats questioned why he felt
compelled to pontificate publicly about a probe in which
he found no criminal wrongdoing.
Comey’s public statements about the case continued, first
in extensive congressional testimony, then in an October
28 letter announcing the FBI had discovered new emails
that could be relevant, and then in another November 6
letter saying the new emails didn’t change the FBI’s
investigative conclusion. All this was highly unusual, to
320
say the least, and some analysts believe Comey‘s late
letters helped swing the election to Trump.
Horowitz’s January 2017 announcement suggested he’d
examine criticisms of Comey‘s behavior from all sides of
the political spectrum — and certain other officials’
conduct too. These included then-Deputy FBI Director
Andrew McCabe (who some conservatives said should
have recused himself because Clinton ally Gov. Terry
McAuliffe had earlier helped fundraise for McCabe’s
wife’s failed state Senate campaign), and then-Justice
official Peter Kadzik, who had contacts with Clinton
campaign chair John Podesta. Finally, Horowitz also said
he would look into DOJ and FBI leaks that happened
during the campaign more generally.
What did the IG report find?
We’re still awaiting the full text of the report, but the
fullest accounting of what Horowitz concluded so far
comes from Chris Strohm of Bloomberg News.
According to Strohm, the report concludes that Comey
public announcement that he would recommend no
charges in the Clinton email case went contrary to Justice
Department tradition — because it is the Justice
Department, not the FBI, that is supposed to decide on
charging decisions. (The FBI is just supposed to
investigate.)
Horowitz says he found no evidence that Comey made his
decisions because of political bias — but that they ended
up hurting the public perception of the FBI anyway.
Indeed, according to Justice Department policy and
tradition, the FBI should not make grand public
pronouncements and criticisms about someone who hasn’t
been charged with any crime. They also shouldn’t
announce investigative actions that could impact an
election just days before that election.
Comey did both of these in the Clinton case. He claims he
was trying to preserve the reputation of the FBI for
impartiality.
 “The confidence of people that the system
is working in a fair way, that Lady Justice
has kept her blindfold on, matters,” he’s
said.
(Less charitably, his actions could be construed as an
attempt to protect himself politically from expected
criticisms from the right.) Yet Horowitz might not be so
convinced that these allegedly lofty motivations justify
Comey’s highly unusual behavior.
According to Strohm, Horowitz also concluded that anti-
Trump text messages exchanged by FBI officials Peter
Strzok and Lisa Page, who were involved in the Clinton
case and having an affair, were ill-advised and displayed
bias. However, he did not find evidence that that affected
any decisions in the email case itself.
Other officials are expected to come in for criticism too,
including Loretta Lynch. Plus, Horowitz has already
referred Comey’s former deputy at the FBI, McCabe, for
criminal prosecution, saying McCabe misled investigators
about his role in a pre-election leak about an investigation
into the Clinton Foundation. Horowitz broke out these
criticisms into a separate IG report — read this post for
more on that — but he may have more to say about
McCabe and the email case here.
What does all this mean for the Russia investigation?
Horowitz’s report may well be quite reasonable in what it
concludes. But inevitably, and almost regardless of the
report’s specifics, President Trump will attempt to exploit
it to try and discredit the Russia investigation (even
though, again, this IG report is not actually about the
Russia investigation).
It’s not the first time Trump has tried to use the Clinton
email case against Comey. Back when Trump fired him as
FBI director in May 2017, the White House initially put
out a cover story saying he did so because Comey violated
DOJ policy in the Clinton email probe.
.
321
This was self-evidently absurd, because the DOJ memo
criticized Comey for actions that hurt Clinton (his critical
public statement about her, and his late letter saying new
emails had been found). Trump, meanwhile, had long
made it unmistakably clear that he thought Comey was too
easy on Clinton in 2016 — and he ended up torpedoing his
aides’ story by admitting the Russia probe played a role in
his decision just two days later.
But now the new IG report could prove useful to Trump
for a few different reasons, as Mueller investigates whether
Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey.
For one, Comey is an important witness to Mueller, and
several of his key interactions with Trump occurred
without anyone else present. Trump, naturally, has aimed a
barrage of criticism at the fired FBI director in an attempt
to impugn his credibility as a witness, calling him “a leaker
and a liar.”
Trump is also searching for ways to argue that he was
correct in firing Comey, and that that act did not constitute
obstruction of justice. So if the IG concludes that Comey
mishandled the Clinton email case, Trump will likely
question how firing an FBI director who’d made such
major errors could possibly be construed as obstruction.
(However, many legal experts believe that if Trump fired
Comey with corrupt intent, in hopes of thwarting an
investigation he viewed as dangerous for either himself or
his allies, it could still be obstruction.)
The IG report is also being released in the midst of a
continuing effort by Trump to try to undermine the Justice
Department’s independence and discredit the Mueller
probe more generally as part of a “deep state” plot against
him. So the more Horowitz criticizes the Obama-era
Justice Department leadership, the more ammunition
Trump will have against them too.
Horowitz, though, is likely trying to ignore this larger
political battle by focusing only on his particular role — to
assess whether there was any Justice Department
misconduct with regards to the 2016 election. Perhaps, in
the end, that’s all he can be expected to do.
 Rudy Giuliani: Mueller Lawyers Were
The Ones “Crying Like Babies” The Night Hillary Lost
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 13, 2018, 10:45 Pm

The always brilliant and entertaining

Rudy Giuliani went on Laura Ingraham
on Wednesday to discuss the Mueller
witch hunt against President Trump.
Rudy was on fire.
Rudy then went on to discuss rip the Mueller squad of
angry Democrats.
“For the two years up to the election I didn’t
talk to any Russians. I don’t know any
Russians. And I don’t drink vodka with
them. So what the hell are they talking
about? What they’re talking about is they’re
bitter over losing this election. And some of
the people right in Mueller’s office were the
ones crying, crying like babies the night
that Hillary lost.”

Via The Ingraham Angle:

Rudy told Laura Ingraham that if Mueller is issuing 150

subpoenas at this late stage as was reported earlier today
then he’s got nothing!

“Where’s the collusion? Where’s the

obstruction? Except in their head!
Everyone know this. They have no case
because Donald Trump did nothing
wrong.”
.

322
 BREAKING: IG Report To Weigh In On Hatch Act
Violations At FBI ‘Officials Using Their Authority To
Interfere With An Election’
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 10:45 Am

Inspector General Michael Horowitz

informed lawmakers weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 400
page report on the FBI’s handling of
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation
entered the final stages.
The report will be released today at 3
PM.
President Trump will see a copy of the
report at noon. Sperry also cautioned: IG
Horowitz and Comey go way
back to the 90’s as US
Attorneys in New York…and his
wife gave money to Obama.

The first leaks on the report say James Comey broke from
FBI procedures when he delivered his report publicly on
the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Last June, then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe was
being investigated by the Office of U.S.
Hillary broke several rules, laws and regulations but was
not found guilty for her actions.
Counsel for violating the Hatch Act according to a report
by Circa News.
It was a sham investigation by the FBI and DOJ.
The Hatch Act prohibits FBI agents from campaigning in
Now this… partisan races. Photos of McCabe campaigning for his
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry says wife raised questions about McCabe’s compliance with the
the IG report will weigh in on Hatch Act law.
violations at the FBI.
The full IG report will be released later Thursday. Stay
Sperry tweeted: BREAKING: Bombshell IG report to tuned. Happy birthday, President Trump!
weigh in on Hatch Act violations at FBI — specifically,
employees using their official authority or influence “to
interfere with or affect the result of an election”

323
 ABC & CBS Ignore Mueller’s
Public Image Hitting All-Time Low
By Kyle Drennen
June 14, 2018 11:05 AM EDT
On Thursday, while reporting on the latest developments
in the Russia investigation, neither ABC’s Good Morning
America nor CBS This Morning made any mention of a
new poll showing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
favorability with the American people dropping to lowest
level since the probe began over a year ago. NBC’s Today
show did manage to note the survey, but only for a mere
17 seconds.
“Meanwhile, there’s evidence President
Trump’s frequent attacks on the Russia
inquiry are taking a toll,” fretted
correspondent Kristen Welker on the NBC
morning show. She explained the results:
“A new poll showing Special Counsel
Robert Mueller’s public image at its
lowest level so far. 36% of all voters
viewing Mueller unfavorably, including
53% of Republicans.”
On finding Welker left out of her seconds-long account of
the Politico/Morning Consult poll was that there was also
a significant increase in the number of people who thought
the Russia investigation was being handled unfairly.
324
“In the latest survey, 40 percent of voters
said it had been handled unfairly,
compared to early February when 34
percent said the probe wasn’t being
handled fairly,” explained a Politico write-
up of the poll.
The article also highlighted:
“Mueller’s unfavorable numbers have hit
highs among both Democrats and
independents, at 24 percent and 33
percent, respectively.”
Like Welker, the Politico piece blamed President Trump
and conservatives for the decline in Mueller’s popularity:
Months of sustained conservative attacks
led by President Donald Trump and his
allies have harmed Mueller most among
Republicans, with a record 53 percent now
saying they view the lead Russia
investigator in an unfavorable light. That’s a
26-point spike since July, when the poll first
started asking voters whether they viewed
Mueller favorably or unfavorably.
Whatever the reason for Mueller’s unfavorable public
image, it’s certainly a fact worth mentioning in any
coverage of the Russia investigation.
Back in the 1990s, the liberal media certainly were not shy
about denigrating the work and character of
Independent Counsel Ken Starr throughout his years-long
investigation of Bill Clinton’s presidency.
 HUGE=> IG Report Reveals Peter Strzok Text Messaged
“We’ll Stop” Trump From Becoming President
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 11:34 Am

It was a sham investigation by the FBI and DOJ.

BREAKING NEWS.
The Inspector General report which will
be released in full shortly, reveals a
previously hidden, extremely damning
text message from Peter Strzok to Lisa
Page.
The Trump-hating agent sent his
mistress a text message saying “we’ll
stop” Trump from becoming President.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
informed lawmakers weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 400
page report on the FBI’s handling of
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation
entered the final stages.
The report will be released today at 3 PM.
Now this…
Peter Strzok reassured his mistress Lisa
Page he would stop Donald Trump from
becoming President!
WaPo reported:
Perhaps the most damaging new revelation
in the report, according to multiple people
familiar with it, is a previously unreported
text message in which Peter Strzok, a key
investigator on both the Clinton email case
and the investigation of Russia and the
Trump campaign, assured an FBI lawyer in
August 2016 that “we’ll stop” Trump from
making it to the White House.
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become
president, right? Right?!” the lawyer, Lisa
Page, wrote to Strzok.
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok
responded.
But no ‘political bias’???
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry says the IG report will
also weigh in on Hatch Act violations at the FBI.
Sperry also cautioned:

President Trump will see a copy of the report at noon.

The first leaks on the report say James Comey broke from
FBI procedures when he delivered his report publicly on
the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

Hillary broke several rules, laws and regulations but was

not found guilty for her actions.

325
 POTUS TRUMP Blasts Disgraced Former AG
Schneiderman And NY Democrats Over Latest Junk
Lawsuit Against Trump Foundation
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 11:49 Am

according to a letter filed Friday in New

York federal court by one of the
woman’s attorneys.

On Thursday President Donald Trump blasted the sleazy

New York Democrats and disgraced AG Schneiderman.

President Trump:

The sleazy New York Democrats, and their

now disgraced (and run out of town) A.G.
Eric Schneiderman, are doing everything
they can to sue me on a foundation that
As previously reported by The Gateway Pundit: took in $18,800,000 and gave out to charity
more money than it took in, $19,200,000. I
Media exploded after it was won’t settle this case! Schneiderman, who
revealed New York Attorney General ran the Clinton campaign in New York,
Eric Schneiderman, who is working with never had the guts to bring this ridiculous
Mueller on Paul Manafort’s case has case, which lingered in their office for
been accused of physical abuse by four almost 2 years. Now he resigned his office
women. in disgrace, and his disciples brought it
when we would not settle.
Schneiderman even threatened to stalk,
wiretap phones and KILL the women if
they broke up with him!

With the explosive story, much of Twitter was

fascinated with President Trump having predicted this all
the way back in 2013 when he said,

“Weiner is gone, Spitzer is gone – next will

be lightweight A.G. Eric Schneiderman. Is
he a crook? Wait and see, worse than
Spitzer or Weiner.”

It turns out that both Trump and Cohen

had the story all the way back in 2013,

326
 WHO DELETED IT? Peter Strzok’s ‘We’ll Stop Trump
From Becoming President’ Text Message Was MISSING
From Earlier Document Productions
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 12:38 Pm
WHO DELETED STRZOK’S DAMNING
TEXT??
The Inspector General report which will
be released in full shortly, reveals a
previously hidden, extremely damning
text message from Peter Strzok to Lisa
Page.
The Trump-hating agent sent his
mistress a text message saying “we’ll
stop” Trump from becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text.
Someone may have deleted this damning text message
because it was ‘missing’ from a previous doc dump.
327
In a newly released text message, Peter
Strzok reassured his mistress Lisa Page
he would stop Donald Trump from
becoming President!
WaPo reported:
Perhaps the most damaging new revelation
in the report, according to multiple people
familiar with it, is a previously unreported
text message in which Peter Strzok, a key
investigator on both the Clinton email case
and the investigation of Russia and the
Trump campaign, assured an FBI lawyer in
August 2016 that “we’ll stop” Trump from
making it to the White House.
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become
president, right? Right?!” the lawyer, Lisa
Page, wrote to Strzok.
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok
responded.
But no ‘political bias’???
Lisa Page’s portion of this text message
exchange was previously disclosed,
however; Strzok’s response was
REMOVED. (screenshot below)
Notice there is no response to Lisa Page texting her lover,
Strzok,
“He’s not ever going to become president,
right? Right?!”
What happened?? Who deleted this?
 The Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross said, “DOJ official is unable to say if Strok’s “we’ll stop” Trump text message
was deleted, or something else. But the response was to an Aug. 9, 2016 message from Lisa Page. That’s
before FBI servers were hit with glitch.”
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring
to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.

Other profanity-laced text messages between Strzok and

Page showed their contempt for Donald Trump.

Lisa Page was also the key person named in Horowitz’s

scathing report about Andrew McCabe.

FBI lawyer Lisa Page resigned on May 4th, however; Peter

Strzok is still employed by the FBI.
Just 6 days later, in another damning text exchange
between the FBI lovebirds was a discussion about an
“insurance policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.

328
 Rep. Meadows: Strzok’s ‘We’ll Stop Trump From
Becoming President’ Text Message Was Also HIDDEN
FROM CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATORS
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 1:05 Pm

Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok
sent his mistress a text message saying
“we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President.
This text message from Strzok was sent
to Page 9 days after “Crossfire
Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text.
Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok:
“(Trump’s) not ever going to become
president, right? Right?!” Strzok reply:
“No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” This
Peter Strzok text about “stopping”
Donald Trump was hidden from
Congressional investigators. We never
had it. Absolutely unreal.

Someone may have deleted this

damning text message because it was
‘missing’ from a previous doc dump.

Rep. Meadows also revealed this

damning text message was HIDDEN
from Congressional investigators as
well as the public.

Meadows then slammed Rosenstein and

Strzok:

I’ve initially reviewed the IG report–two

questions are most pressing:

1) Why is Peter Strzok still employed?

2) Why has Rod Rosenstein repeatedly

failed to promptly inform Congress of
WOW. improper conduct?

Not only was the public in the dark about this extremely
damning text from Strzok, it was also most likely
deliberately hidden from Congressional investigators.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-NC)

unleashed on Thursday after reading the shocking text
message from Strzok.

Rep. Meadows tweeted:

329
 Lisa Page’s portion of this text message
exchange was previously disclosed,
however; Strzok’s response was
REMOVED. (screenshot via Chuck Ross
below)
Notice there is no response to Lisa Page texting her lover,
Strzok,
The Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross said,
“DOJ official is unable to say if Strok’s
“we’ll stop” Trump text message was
deleted, or something else. But the
response was to an Aug. 9, 2016
message from Lisa Page. That’s before
FBI servers were hit with glitch.”
330
“He’s not ever going to become
president, right? Right?!”
What happened?? Who deleted this?
Just 6 days later, in another damning text exchange
between the FBI lovebirds was a discussion about an
“insurance policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for
consideration in Andy’s office…that there’s
no way [Trump] gets elected…but I’m
afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok text
messaged to Page in an Aug. 15, 2016
exchange, referring to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely
event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok
added.
Other profanity-laced text messages between Strzok and
Page showed their contempt for Donald Trump.
FBI lawyer Lisa Page resigned on May 4th, however; Peter
Strzok is still employed by the FBI.
 Attorney Warns: Rich Family, Obama Admin Lawyers
‘Desperately’ Obstructing Wikileaks From Revealing
Truth About ‘Hacked’ DNC Server
By Alicia Powe
June 14, 2018, 1:13 Pm
Former President Obama’s White House Counsel,
representing the brother of slain DNC staffer Seth Rich,
are refusing to authorize Wikileaks to release information
that would reveal the truth about how the whistle blower
organization obtained troves of DNC and Clinton
campaign emails during the 2016 election, an attorney
who’s been subpoenaed by Rich’s legal team warns.
Aaron Rich, the brother of Seth Rich, filed a lawsuit in
April in US District Court in the District of Columbia,
against the Ed Butowsky , a wealth management and
financial adviser who financed a private investigator to
help the Rich family find Seth’s killer(s); Matt Couch and
his media company, America First Media; and the
conservative-leaning newspaper the Washington Times for
defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress and
invasion of privacy, among other actions.
In the summer of 2016, in the heat of a highly contentious
presidential campaign, Seth was shot twice in the back
while he walked home and died in a hospital hours later.
The Metropolitan Police Department insist his murder was
a “botched robbery,” despite his wallet, credit cards, watch
and phone being left in his possession. But independent
investigators have asserted his murder “more likely (was)
committed by a hired killer or serial murderer.”
331
On July 22 2016, just twelve days after Rich’s death on the
eve of the Democratic Party Convention in Philadelphia,
WikiLeaks released 20,000 emails from DNC officials.
Aaron Rich’s suit alleges the defendants have peddled
“false and unfounded claims” and acted “with reckless
disregard for the truth” to “advance” their political agendas
by claiming he and his brother orchestrated leaks from the
DNC to Wikileaks in exchange for cash.
But Rich’s lawsuit, which is conspicuously being
prosecuted by lawyers who worked with the Obama
administration, is a and perpetuate unsubstantiated claims
that President Trump colluded with Russia to hack the
DNC server, Butowski’s attorney, Ty Clevenger, explained
in an exclusive interview with the Gateway Pundit.
“It’s a Kamikaze maneuver, the whole
Russian collusion story is falling apart so to
keep it alive they are all filing these
lawsuits with all of these wild allegations,”
Clevenger argued. “It’s a desperation
move.”
The lawsuit is bogus, Clevenger explained, because Rich’s
father, Joel, admitted to Butowski that his sons leaked the
emails and Butowski has only reiterated what the Joel
family confirmed.

Seth Rich’s parents, Joel and Mary Rich, and brother,
Aaron
“They are saying it’s some giant conspiracy
in this allegation and that allegedly my
client was part of it. My client, Ed
Butowski’s position is, he’s repeating what
Joel Rich, Seth’s father, told him.
According to what Ed relayed to me, Ed
told Joel that what he had been hearing,
about Rich leaking the DNC emails, and
Joel responded saying he ‘already knew
what his sons had done,’” he said. “Based
on my understanding, from what Joel said
to Ed, he did not dispute the idea at all that
his sons were involved in leaking emails.”
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has also insinuated was
Rich was the source WikiLeaks used to obtain the emails.
Last week, Twitter sent out notices on behalf of Rich’s
legal team to Clevenger, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Roger
Stone, Kim DotCom, Matt Couch, the Gateway Pundit and
Gateway Pundit reporter Cassandra Fairbanks, demanding
they turn over all direct messages from their accounts to
Aarron Rich’s Democrat-connected attorneys.
Rich’s attorneys then dropped the subpoena of Twitter text
messages on Tuesday.
Rich’s legal teams resorted to an “unlawful and
unenforceable” subpoena of private Twitter
332
correspondences retaliate against Clevenger for demanding
the Rich family authorize WikiLeaks to reveal what it
knows about the DNC data breach, Clevenger explained.
“It was retaliation – I had been pushing for
them to authorize WikiLeaks to reveal what
it knows – I kept pushing, they responded
by turning around and trying to subpoena
my private communications,” he said.
“They won’t authorize WikiLeaks. And they
claim ‘we are going to subpoena
WikiLeaks, but they won’t issue any
subpoenas.
“Private Twitter communications I had
about Seth Rich, they wanted it – never
mind whether it was attorney client
privileged or any other privilege,” he
continued. “They just wanted to grab my
private communication. I never even heard
of lawyers on one side trying to do that to
lawyers on the other side – that’s crazy.
They withdrew it because they knew they
were going to get in trouble. It was just
harassment – they were just trying to send
me a message.”
WikiLeaks protects it sources,
“but if the Rich family came out and said
‘tell the world what you know, reveal what
emails you have regarding to Rich’ then,
Assange would be willing to do it,” he
continued.
“For all we know there’s was a contract
between WikiLeaks and Seth Rich and if
there’s a contract, his estate can still
enforce the contract. And who is in charge
of the estate? Aaron Rich,” he said. “That’s
all we are asking him, unseal the case. Put
the facts out there. Quit trying to hide
behind all of these excuses. That is the
heart of what’s going on. They are going
out at desperate lengths to change the
subject from the fact that they don’t want
WikiLeaks to reveal what it knows.”
Clevenger has filed bar grievances against former FBI
Director James Comey based on evidence that he lied to
Congress and destroyed evidence from the Hillary Clinton
email investigation. He has tried to get Clinton and her
personal attorneys disbarred for their handling of her
official emails during her time as secretary of state. He
also filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in
2016 asking for documents from the FBI and the Justice
Department about the Clinton email investigation. The
FBI is declined to turn over files, arguing a lack of public
interest in the matter.
 And they never will.

Attorney Ty Clevenger

The lawyer representing Rich, Michael J. Gottlieb, served
as Special Assistant to the President and Associate White
House Counsel from 2009- 2010, where he focused on
national security law and judicial nominations. In January
2010, he left the White House to serve as Senior Civilian
and Deputy Director of Combined Joint Interagency Task
Force 435 in Kabul Afghanistan. Following his time in
Afghanistan, Gottlieb returned to the White House
Counsel’s Office, where he served until the end of
February 2013.
A second attorney prosecuting Rich’s case is David Boies,
chairman of the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner, whos
has been involved in various high-profile cases in
the United States, including Bush v. Gore, the defense
of Harvey Weinstein against sexual abuse allegations and
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
Rich’s story has been largely ignored by establishment
media. Those who have called attention to the suspicious
circumstances surrounding his murder have been branded
“conspiracy theorists,” including Fox News host Sean
Hannity.
Rather than availing the server to the FBI for forensic
examination, which would determine whether the server
was hacked or the emails were leaked, the DNC hired the
private cyber security firm CrowdStrike to provide replicas
of the server’s data to the FBI and then destroyed the
server.
Federal Election Commission records show that
CrowdStrike received a $98,849.84 check from the
Democratic National Committee the day after Seth Rich
was killed. Yet, the DNC has yet to offer a reward for
information leading to the arrest of the murderer of its own
young staffer.
WikiLeaks is offering $20,000 for information leading to
the arrest of Rich’s killer. The D.C. Metropolitan Police
Department is offering $25,000; One America News
Network, $100,000; GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman,
$105,000; and businessman and investor Martin Shkreli,
$100,000. The DNC honored its murdered employee by
dedicating a bike rack outside its headquarters to Rich’s
memory.

Clevenger blasted conservatives for apathetically allowing

Democrats perpetuate the Russia probe

“Somebody on the Republican side has to

stand up and push a lot harder and that
includes Trump, he’s got to get his own
Justice Department together,” he said. “Jeff
Sessions has been a grave
disappointment.”

While, the intelligence-community assessment released in

January 2017 on purported Russian meddling in the 2016
race, conducted by the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA,
concludes Russian President Vladimir Putin personally
ordered the hacking of the DNC and the dissemination of
The DNC honored its murdered employee, Seth Rich, by
emails from key staffers via WikiLeaks to damage Hillary
dedicating a bike rack with this plaque outside its
Clinton’s candidacy, not a single government agency has
headquarters to Rich’s memory.
even viewed the hacked computer servers to conduct a
forensic data-breach investigation.

333
Just Out. St 3:00pm June 14th, 2018 (560 pages, see 37a-Appendix for Repot)

334
 Dirty Cop Rosenstein Spotted Leaving
White House After 2.5 Hour Meeting On IG Report
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 1:29 Pm

Inspector General Michael Horowitz

released his much anticipated review on
FBI and DOJ actions during the Hillary
Clinton email investigation.

Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok sent his mistress a

text message saying “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President. Rod Rosenstein was spotted leaving the
White House after 2 hours and 25
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days minutes.
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who signed

one of the bogus FISA applications to spy on Donald
Trump, met with White House officials Thursday
preceding the report’s release.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused

himself from the sham investigation the
day after he was sworn into office.
He has been absent as Deep State
radicals continue to attack this
Republican President.
.

335
 BREAKING: Full Report By Inspector General On FBI
Handling Of Clinton Investigation Released
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 1:30 Pm
BREAKING NEWS.
The Office of Inspector General released
the full 500 page report on the FBI’s
(mis)handling of the Clinton email
investigation Thursday afternoon.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
informed lawmakers weeks ago on
Capitol Hill his much-anticipated 500
page report on the FBI’s handling of
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation
entered the final stages.
Lawyers for the subjects included in the report were given
a draft copy to prepare rebuttals for their clients which is
what partially led to delays in releasing the report to the
public.
What we know so far…
The first leaks on the report say James
Comey broke from FBI procedures when
.
336
he delivered his report publicly on the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Hillary broke several rules, laws and
regulations but was not found guilty for
her actions.
It was a sham investigation by the FBI
and DOJ.
Comey broke from FBI procedure but
was not politically biased.
What a joke. It is obvious to anyone paying attention that
James Comey has a deep-seated hatred of Donald Trump.
Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok
sent his mistress a text message saying
“we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
Someone may have deleted this damning text message
because it was ‘missing’ from a previous doc dump.
Rep. Meadows also revealed this damning text message
was HIDDEN from Congressional investigators as well as
the public.
Story developing…The Gateway Pundit will be breaking
down the IG report throughout the day.
 Comey Responds To IG Report: ‘This Report Says I Was
Wrong. But That’s Good For The FBI’
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 1:52 Pm
On Thursday, fired FBI Director James
Comey responded to the Inspector
General’s report in an op-ed in the New
York Times.
‘This report says I was wrong. But that’s
good for the FBI,’ said Comey.
Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Comey broke from FBI procedure but was not politically
biased.
What a joke. It is obvious to anyone paying attention that
James Comey has a deep-seated hatred of Donald Trump.
Comey penned an op-ed in the New York Times prior to
the IG report being released to the public.
Comey first tweeted:
I respect the DOJ IG office, which is why I
urged them to do this review. The
conclusions are reasonable, even though I
disagree with some. People of good faith
can see an unprecedented situation
337
differently. I pray no Director faces it again.
Thanks to IG’s people for hard work.
Then Comey tweeted out his NY Times op-ed.
In the NY Times op-ed, Comey brags the
Inspector General found “no evidence
of bias or improper motivation affected
the investigation.”
The Department of Justice’s independent watchdog, the
inspector general, has released a report that is critical of
my decisions as F.B.I. director during the investigation of
Hillary Clinton’s email account. The report concludes that
I was wrong to announce the F.B.I.’s completion of the
investigation without coordinating with the attorney
general and that I was wrong to inform Congress in late
October that we had reopened the investigation.
In both situations, the inspector general’s team concludes,
I should have adhered to established norms, which they see
as mandating both deference to the attorney general on the
public announcement and silence about an investigation so
close to an election.
I do not agree with all of the inspector general’s
conclusions, but I respect the work of his office and salute
its professionalism. All of our leaders need to understand
that accountability and transparency are essential to the
functioning of our democracy, even when it involves
criticism. This is how the process is supposed to work.
This report is important for two reasons.
First, the inspector general’s team went through the Rep. Meadows also revealed this
F.B.I.’s work with a microscope and found no evidence damning text message was HIDDEN
that bias or improper motivation affected the investigation, from Congressional investigators as
which I know was done competently, honestly and well as the public.
independently.
Investigative reporter, Paul Sperry cautioned earlier
What a complete sham. Thursday that Horowitz is deeply conflicted.

No political bias?

Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok

sent his mistress a text message saying
“we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President.
This text message from Strzok was sent
to Page 9 days after “Crossfire
Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text.
Someone may have deleted this
damning text message because it was
‘missing’ from a previous doc dump.
.

338
 IG Report Reveals Crooked Comey
Used Secret Gmail Account For FBI Business
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 2:20 Pm
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the IG report, then-FBI
Director James Comey used a secret
Gmail account when conducting FBI
business, despite warning other agents
they would be in “huge trouble” if they
did the same thing.
CNBC reported:
James Comey used a personal Gmail
account to conduct FBI business on
numerous occasions when he was director
of the bureau — even though he warned
FBI worker they would be in “huge trouble”
for doing the same thing, the Justice
Department‘s internal watchdog revealed
Thursday.
Comey’s frequent use of a personal email
account for unclassified FBI business was
“inconsistent with” the policy statement for
email use by the Justice Department,
according to a report issued by the Office
of the Inspector General.
The findings were published on page 425
of the report.
339
The IG noted Comey blasted agents in a speech in October
of 2016 over the use of private email/private server.
“I have gotten emails from some employees about this,
who said, “If I did what Hillary Clinton did I’d be in huge
trouble.’ “
“My response is you bet your ass you’d be
in huge trouble,” Comey said in that
speech.
“If you used a personal email, Gmail or
if you [had] the capabilities to set up
your own email domain, if you used an
unclassified personal email system to
do our business in the course of doing
our business even though you were
communicating with people with
clearances and doing work you
discussed classified matters in that, in
those communications, TS/SCI, special
access programs, you would be in huge
trouble in the FBI,” Comey said.
“Of that I am highly confident,” he added.
“I’m also highly confident, in fact,
certain you would not be criminally
prosecuted for that conduct.”
The IG report identified FIVE different instances where
Comey used a Gmail account to conduct official FBI
business, CNBC reported.
So why the hell is Comey still walking around freely after
all of this has come to light??
The Inspector General said Comey broke from FBI
procedure but was not politically biased.
What a complete sham!
 On Thursday, fired FBI Director James
Comey responded to the Inspector
General’s report in an op-ed in the New
York Times.
‘This report says I was wrong. But that’s
good for the FBI,’ said Comey.
Comey penned an op-ed in the New York Times prior to the
IG report being released to the public.
.
340
Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok sent his mistress a
text message saying “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text, but no political bias,
says Horowitz.
 HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Another Lawyer Was
Removed From Mueller’s Team This February Over Anti-
Trump Text Messages
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 2:40 Pm
BREAKING NEWS.
The IG report released Thursday
revealed ANOTHER lawyer was removed
from Mueller’s team of liberal hacks
February of this year after anti-Trump
text messages surfaced.
‘Viva Le Resistance,’ said the
unidentified Trump-hating (future)
Mueller lawyer in a November 2016 text
message.
Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller reported:
An FBI attorney who worked on the special counsel’s
Russia investigation until earlier this year sent anti-Trump
text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming:
“Viva le Resistance.”
341
The attorney’s comments are revealed in a Justice
Department inspector general’s report released on
Thursday.
The lawyer is not identified, but he worked on the Hillary
Clinton email investigation and was the FBI’s lead
attorney on the investigation into Russian election
interference. He was assigned to special counsel Robert
Mueller’s investigation soon after it began in May 2017
and left in late February of this year after some of his
private messages were shared with the special counsel.
The unidentified FBI lawyer said he was “numb” just days
after Trump was elected to the White House.
Apparently the FBI lawyer became galvanized in his effort
to resist Trump, reported Chuck Ross:
“Is it making you rethink your commitment
to the Trump administration?” one FBI
lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.
“Hell no. Viva le resistance,” the future
Mueller attorney responded.
According to the report, this Trump-hating FBI lawyer
claimed in an interview with the Office of Inspector
General he didn’t let his political feelings or beliefs impact
his work on Hillary’s email investigation or the Russia
probe.
RIGHT.
And Horowitz said there was no political bias at the FBI…
 AWFUL! CNN Analyst Starts SCREAMING AT SARAH
HUCKABEE SANDERS During Presser (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 2:56 Pm
What an ugly display.
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
But rather than discuss the findings from the report that
reveal anti-Trump bias and corruption at the highest levels
of the Department of Justice and FBI, the liberal White
House reporters peppered Sarah Huckabee Sanders with
questions on the Obama policy of splitting children of
illegal aliens from adults. Liberals are determined to blame
Trump for a policy that was on the books during the
Obama years.
At one point CNN political analyst Brian
Karem STARTED SCREAMING at Sarah
Huckabee Sanders about her role as a
mother!
Brian Karem: Come on, Sarah! You’re a
parent! Don’t you have any empathy for
what these people are going through.
342
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: Brian, gosh.
Settle down.
Brian Karem: Seriously!
Sarah Sanders: I try to be serious but I
won’t honor you for speaking out of turn.
Brian Karem: It’s a law and these people
have nothing.
Sarah Sanders: Hey Brian, I know you
want to get some more TV time. But that is
not what this is about.
Brian Karem: You’re not answering the
question Sarah! Honestly answer the
question. It’s a serious question. These
people have nothing. They come to the
border with nothing and they put the
children in cages (photos from Obama
years). You’re a parent! You’re a parent of
young children! Don’t you have any
empathy for what they go through?!
These reporters are OUT OF CONTROL!
In what other professional setting would
they be allowed to show such
disrespect?
 IG Report: McCabe Continued To Involve
Himself In Clinton Probe AFTER He Recused
Himself For Conflicts Of Interest
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 3:43 Pm

On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the Inspector General, McCabe continued to
involve himself in the Clinton probe AFTER he recused
himself for obvious conflicts of interest.
Even worse, McCabe deliberately hid his recusal from the
Senate Judiciary Committee.
Now we find out he was still involved in Hillary Clinton’s
probe even though he recused himself from the
investigation.
Follow this thread from investigative
reporter, Paul Sperry…
McCabe was present at meetings where
the Clinton email investigation was
discussed.

The FBI did not publicize McCabe’s

recusal from the Clinton investigations.
As previously reported, conservative watchdog group
Judicial Watch obtained documents in November of 2017
showing Deep State Andrew McCabe didn’t recuse
himself from the FBI’s email investigation of Hillary
Clinton until ONE WEEK before the presidential election
(Nov 2016) despite obvious conflicts of interest with his
wife’s campaign donors.

Andrew McCabe’s wife, Jill McCabe is an ER Pediatrician

who was recruited to run for state Senate in Virginia. She
lost the race in November of 2015 and subsequently came The IG found at least THREE instances
under heavy scrutiny for $700,000 in campaign donations where McCabe continued to involve
she received from Hillary’s friends whilst her husband was himself in Clinton’s investigation even
investigating Clinton. though he recused himself Nov 1st,
2016.
According to Judicial Watch McCabe controlled resources
supporting the investigation into Hillary’s email scandal
while his wife was running for Virginia State Senate:

343
 So Andrew McCabe was able to protect Hillary Clinton
McCabe and Lisa Page deliberately
during the ENTIRE investigation and didn’t recuse
withheld McCabe’s recusal from the
himself until a week before the election.
Senate Judiciary Committee.

Now we find out he was still meddling in Hillary’s

investigation despite his recusal.

And Horowitz says there was no political bias at the FBI…

McCabe did not fully comply with his

recusal.
.

344
 Inspector General Refers FIVE FBI Employees For
Investigation After MORE Anti-Trump
Text Messages Surface
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 4:27 Pm
Inspector General Horowitz referred
FIVE FBI employees for investigation
after MORE disgusting anti-Trump text
messages surfaced.
The five FBI employees have not been
named at this time.
These FBI agents not only hate Donald Trump, they have a
tremendous amount of contempt for Trump supporters as
well.
“Trump supporters are all poor to middle
class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he
will magically grant them jobs for doing
nothing. They probably didn’t watch the
debates, aren’t fully educated on his
policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his
umerited enthusiasm,” wrote an FBI official.
(screenshot via Breitbart Editor Amanda
House)
No political bias though, right?
More grotesque anti-Trump text messages surfaced after
the Inspector General report was released.
Fox News reported:
345
The report revealed instant messages between unnamed
agents, labeled “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,” discussing their
jobs in August 2016.
“I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an
absolute f—ing idiot. If you don’t think so,
ask them one more question. Who are you
voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald
Drumpf,” Agent 1 sent.
“I forgot about drumpf…that’s so sad and
pathetic if they want to vote for him,” Agent
5 responded. “Someone who can’t answer
a question. Someone who can’t be
professional for even a second.”
In September, Agent 1 and 5 conversed again, bashing
Trump supporters as “retarded.”
“I’m trying to think of a ‘would I rather’
instead of spending time with those
people,” Agent 5 sent.
Agent 1 asked,
“stick your tongue in a fan??”
Agent 5 later wrote:
“I would rather have brunch with trump and
a bunch of his supporters like the ones
from ohio that are retarded.”
The report did not, however, find evidence connecting
those political opinions held by FBI officials to decisions
made in the Clinton investigation.
Futher, the report said that while it found no evidence the
views influenced investigative decisions, “five employees”
have been referred for investigation into whether the
messages violated FBI code.
“The FBI will handle these referrals
pursuant to the FBI’s disciplinary
investigation and adjudication processes,
and will impose disciplinary measures as
warranted,” the report read.
.
346
It is unclear which five FBI employees have been referred
for investigation.
An FBI spokesperson told Fox News Thursday they were
not able to comment on the names of the five employees
referred for investigation.
Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok
also sent his mistress a text message
saying “we’ll stop” Trump from
becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent
to Page 9 days after “Crossfire
Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text.
Rep. Meadows also revealed this damning text message
was HIDDEN from Congressional investigators as well as
the public.
Why is Strzok still employed by the FBI?? Why isn’t
Comey in cuffs? Why is Rosenstein still DAG??
 “But My Emails” Hillary Clinton Trolls Comey After IG
Report Reveals He Used Secret Gmail
To Conduct FBI Business
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 4:47 Pm
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during the
Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the IG report, then-FBI Director
James Comey used a secret Gmail account
when conducting FBI business, despite
warning other agents they would be in
“huge trouble” if they did the same thing.
The IG noted Comey blasted agents in a speech in October
of 2016 over the use of private email/private server.
“I have gotten emails from some employees
about this, who said, “If I did what Hillary Clinton
did I’d be in huge trouble.’ “
“My response is you bet your ass you’d be in
huge trouble,” Comey said in that speech.
“If you used a personal email, Gmail or if
you [had] the capabilities to set up your own
email domain, if you used an unclassified
personal email system to do our business in
347
Crooked Hillary Clinton trolled Comey from her Twitter
account Thursday afternoon.
CNBC reported:
James Comey used a personal Gmail account
to conduct FBI business on numerous
occasions when he was director of the bureau
— even though he warned FBI worker they
would be in “huge trouble” for doing the same
thing, the Justice Department‘s internal
watchdog revealed Thursday.
Comey’s frequent use of a personal email
account for unclassified FBI business was
“inconsistent with” the policy statement for email
use by the Justice Department, according to a
report issued by the Office of the Inspector
General.
The findings were published on page 425 of the report.
the course of doing our business even
though you were communicating with
people with clearances and doing work you
discussed classified matters in that, in those
communications, TS/SCI, special access
programs, you would be in huge trouble in
the FBI,” Comey said.
“Of that I am highly confident,” he added. “I’m
also highly confident, in fact, certain you
would not be criminally prosecuted for that
conduct.”
The IG report identified FIVE different instances where
Comey used a Gmail account to conduct official FBI
business, CNBC reported.

Hillary Clinton took to her Twitter account Thursday and

trolled the hell outta Comey.

Hillary tweeted:

“But my emails”

Pathetic! These two both belong in prison.

348
 IG Report Littered With References
Of Top FBI Officials Calling Trump Supporters:
F***Ing Idiots, Sad,
Pathetic, Retarded
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 5:31 Pm

What a disgrace.

The top officials at the FBI and DOJ hated

Donald Trump and his supporters.

The Deep State hacks called Trump Retarded.

supporters: F***ing Idiots, Sad, Pathetic,
Retarded

Death threats.

F**king idiots.
349
 FBI Director Wray Defends The Swamp In Press
Conference After IG Report Released ‘No Evidence Of
Political Bias’ (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 5:47 Pm

“I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an

FBI Director Christopher Wray held a absolute f—ing idiot. If you don’t think so,
press conference on Thursday ask them one more question. Who are you
afternoon from the FBI headquarters in voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald
DC after the IG report was released. Drumpf,” Agent 1 sent.

Wray defended the swamp; he said the “I forgot about drumpf…that’s so sad and
IG report “did not find any evidence of pathetic if they want to vote for him,” Agent
political bias or improper 5 responded. “Someone who can’t answer
considerations actually impacting the a question. Someone who can’t be
investigation under review.” professional for even a second.”

In September, Agent 1 and 5 conversed again, bashing

Trump supporters as “retarded.”

“I’m trying to think of a ‘would I rather’

instead of spending time with those
people,” Agent 5 sent.
Agent 1 asked, “stick your tongue in a
fan??”

Agent 5 later wrote:

“I would rather have brunch with trump and

This is outrageous. a bunch of his supporters like the ones
from Ohio that are retarded.”
Americans are disgusted after reading more anti-Trump
text messages from FBI agents. The report did not, however, find evidence connecting
those political opinions held by FBI officials to decisions
What a disgrace. made in the Clinton investigation.

The top officials at the FBI and DOJ hated Donald Trump
and his supporters.
The Deep State hacks called Trump supporters: F***ing
Idiots, Sad, Pathetic, Retarded.
Fox News reported:
The report revealed instant messages
between unnamed agents, labeled “Agent
1” and “Agent 5,” discussing their jobs in
August 2016.
Futher, the report said that while it found no evidence the
views influenced investigative decisions, “five employees”
have been referred for investigation into whether the
messages violated FBI code.
“The FBI will handle these referrals
pursuant to the FBI’s disciplinary
investigation and adjudication processes,
and will impose disciplinary measures as
warranted,” the report read.
It is unclear which five FBI employees have been referred
for investigation.

350
An FBI spokesperson told Fox News Thursday they were
not able to comment on the names of the five employees
referred for investigation.

Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok

also sent his mistress a text message
saying “we’ll stop” Trump from
becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent
to Page 9 days after “Crossfire
Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
before the “insurance policy” text.

No political bias though…

FBI Director Wray isn’t even taking this seriously.

The press conference was more smoke and mirrors.

A few soundbites from Christopher Wray:

“We need to hold ourselves accountable for

the choices we make and the work we do.”
“The report does identify errors of
judgment, violations of or even disregard
for policy and decisions that at the very
least, with the benefit of hindsight, were not
the best choices.”
“We’re gonna make sure that every FBI
employee understands the lessons of this
report.”
“There’s some sobering lessons in there
and we’re gonna learn those lessons and
we’re gonna act on those lessons.”

Paul Sperry blasted FBI Director Wray.

351
 Newly Obtained Documents Reveal ‘Foreign Actors’
Accessed Hillary Clinton’s Emails
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 6:39 Pm
range of issues in their memo including Clinton’s email
Lock her up! security.

New documents obtained by the House “Documents provided to the Committees

Judiciary Committee reveal ‘foreign show foreign actors obtained access to
actors’ accessed Hillary Clinton’s some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including
emails. at least one email classified ‘Secret,'” the
memo says, adding that foreign actors also
One email was classified as “secret,” accessed the private accounts of some
reports Fox News’ Catherine Herridge. Clinton staffers.

The memo did not disclose who the ‘foreign actors’ are.

Also, no one has been held accountable for the security

breach.

Shocker.

Hillary Clinton used a private server and email while she

was Secretary of State to conceal her Clinton Foundation
pay-to-play.

She put the country at risk by conducting official business

on an unsecured server and as suspected, ‘foreign actors’
obtained access to her emails.

Back in January, an FBI document dump revealed ‘hostile

foreign actors’ infiltrated Hillary’s homebrew server.
Fox News reported:
In November the FBI announced with “99% accuracy” that
“Foreign actors” obtained access to some Hillary Clinton’s private email server had been hacked by
of former Secretary of State Hillary at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that things
Clinton’s emails — including at least one had been taken from that.
email classified as “secret” — according to
a new memo from two GOP-led House
The Inspector General report was released Thursday and it
committees and an internal FBI email.
ignored evidence Crooked Hillary knew her homebrew
Fox News obtained the memo prepared by server was risky.
the House Judiciary and Oversight
committees, which lays out key interim President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton slammed the
findings ahead of next week’s hearing with Inspector General for ignoring Hillary’s crimes.
Justice Department Inspector General
Michael Horowitz. The IG, separately, is
Fitton tweeted: What troubles me about IG report is that it
expected to release his highly anticipated
ignores evidence that Hillary Clinton knew her email
report on the Clinton email case later
system was risky, that she set it up purposely to avoid
Thursday.
accountability, and ignored security warnings about her
practices. @JudicialWatch uncovered all of this–not the
The House committees, which conducted a joint probe into Obama DOJ/FBI.
decisions made by the DOJ in 2016 and 2017, addressed a
352
 And Hillary actually thought she deserved to be President
of the United States.

Hillary Clinton should spend the rest of her life in prison.

353
 Director Wray Says FBI Electioneering Including Deep
State Spying On Trump Campaign Shows “No
Evidence Of Political Bias”
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 7:26 Pm

The top officials at the FBI and DOJ hated Donald Trump
and his supporters.

The Deep State hacks called Trump supporters: F***ing

Idiots, Sad, Pathetic, Retarded.

Chris Wray told reporters there was “no

evidence of political bias.”

This is the same FBI that had spies

FBI Director Christopher Wray held a inside the Trump campaign and
press conference on Thursday continued to spy on President-elect
afternoon from the FBI headquarters in Trump after his election and
DC following the release of the IG report inauguration.
was released. And the FBI spy infiltrating the Trump
Wray defended the swamp; he said the campaign openly advocated for Hillary
IG report “did not find any evidence of Clinton during the election.
political bias or improper
considerations actually impacting the Stefan Halper was promoting Hillary
investigation under review.” Clinton publicly while he spied on the
Trump Campaign.

And Christopher Wray says there was

no evidence of political bias.
Wray needs to go.

This is outrageous.

Americans are disgusted after reading more anti-Trump

text messages from FBI agents.

What a disgrace.
.

354
 HE WENT THERE=> Rep Desantis Drops A MOAB On
Crooked Hillary After She Trolls Comey
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 7:40 Pm

DeSantis tweeted over Hillary:

‘But Bleachbit”

Crooked Hillary Clinton trolled Comey

from her Twitter account Thursday
afternoon after the IG report revealed
Comey used a Gmail account to
conduct FBI business.
Hillary tweeted: “But my emails”
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) dropped a According to the IG report, then-FBI Director James
MOAB on Hillary and absolutely lit Comey used a secret Gmail account when conducting FBI
Twitter ablaze. business, despite warning other agents they would be in
“huge trouble” if they did the same thing.

The findings were published on page 425 of the report.

The FBI admitted in the summer of 2016 Hillary Clinton

used BleachBit software to hide all traces of her deleted
emails.

BleachBit goes beyond simply deleting files, BleachBit

In a grotesque display of unabated
hubris, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “But my
emails.”
Congressman DeSantis dunked on
Hillary and it was glorious.
includes advanced features such as shredding files to
prevent recovery, wiping free disk space to hide traces of
files deleted by other applications, and vacuuming Firefox
to make it faster. Better than free, BleachBit is open
source.
Thank you, Congressman DeSantis!
Lock her up!

.
355
 REVEALED: At Least TWO Of The FBI Agents To
Interview Hillary Were Having Affairs With Fellow Agents
And Were HILLARY GROUPIES
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 8:52 Pm
On July 2, 2016, Democrat presidential nominee Hillary
Clinton was interviewed by FBI agents – off the record,
and without taking notes — on her misuse of classified
documents and her illegal home-brew server she used to
store personal and government emails.
It is now understood that several foreign actors accessed
her emails from the illegal server.
Comey wrote Hillary’s exoneration months before the
interview at FBI headquarters.
In December 2017 the FBI revealed that top FBI
investigator Peter Strzok who was having an affair with
Lisa Page was the top FBI investigator in the Hillary
Clinton email scandal.
Strzok promised his lover Lisa Page that “we’ll stop”
Trump from becoming president.
356
This comment was deleted from a previous document
release by the FBI.
On Thursday we discovered there was a second top FBI
official was removed from Mueller’s team of liberal hacks
February of this year after anti-Trump text messages
surfaced.
This unnamed FBI officials “Agent 1”
and “Agent 5” were involved in the FBI
Clinton investigation.
In fact the fired far left agent also
participated in the Clinton interview on
July 2, 2016.
The Weekly Standard reported:
Perhaps the most shocking information in
the IG’s report is the revelation that Lisa
Page and Peter Strzok were not the only
amorous agents with a habit of texting.
There were also “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,”
who were involved in the Clinton
investigation and, according to the IG’s
report “were in a relationship at the time
and are now married.” Their
communications make for a searing
indictment of the culture of the FBI and
paint a portrait of the investigation into
Hillary Clinton’s email practices as fiasco.
A few days before the Clinton confab, he sent an instant-
message in which he complained about how many agents
and attorneys were prepping for the questioning: “… very
aggravating making this flow with 20+ voices for disparate
information anyway.” Fair enough. But then, as the
message goes on he suggests that he has a certain lack of
enthusiasm for the whole affair. “We have nothing—
shouldn’t even be interviewing”
Just in case his girlfriend didn’t savvy the
full extent of his disgruntlement at the
prospect of interviewing Hillary Clinton,
Agent 1 added “My god … I’m actually
 starting to have embarrassment sprinkled
on my disappointment. … Ever been forced
to do something you adamantly
opposed.”…
…There are reasons to think that Agent 1
was dissatisfied because the organization
.
357
was phoning in a politically determined
investigation. But there are also reasons to
think his unhappiness flowed from an
admiration for Hillary. Take his message to
Agent 5 after completing the questioning of
Clinton: “done interviewing the President.”
 IG Report: FBI Agents Regularly Received ‘Improper’
Gifts From Reporters In Exchange For Leaks
By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018, 10:09 Pm
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the Inspector General, FBI employees were
receiving “tickets to sporting events, golfing outings,
drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social
events,” from reporters in exchange for unauthorized leaks.
This was all happening under leaker Comey’s
Directorship.
Fox News reported:
Numerous FBI employees accepted
inappropriate gifts from reporters and
routinely spoke to media outlets without
authorization during the Hillary Clinton
email probe, the Justice Department’s
watchdog revealed in Thursday’s long-
awaited accountability report.
The shocking revelation came just a week after the former
security director for the Senate Intelligence Committee —
who was in charge of maintaining all classified
information from the Executive Office to the panel — was
indicted for allegedly giving false statements to FBI agents
looking into possible leaks to reporters.
“We identified instances where FBI
employees improperly received benefits
.
358
from reporters, including tickets to sporting
events, golfing outings, drinks and meals,
and admittance to nonpublic social events,”
reads the report by the inspector general,
Michael Horowitz.
Remarkably, at least two unauthorized phone calls to
reporters came from an “unattributed FBI HQ phone
number,” the IG report says — suggesting that some
employees at the bureau were brazenly leaking information
from phones in the agency’s headquarters in Washington,
D.C.
“We have profound concerns about the
volume and extent of unauthorized media
contacts by FBI personnel that we have
uncovered during our review,” the IG
continued. “These leaks highlight the need
to change what appears to be a cultural
attitude among many in the organization.”
In mid-April, the Inspector General released a scathing
report on McCabe, who lied under oath about his leaks to
the Wall Street Journal.
Fired FBI Director James Comey also leaked contents of
his memos he penned stemming from 7 conversations he
had with President Trump to his ‘friend’ Daniel Richmond
to give to the New York Times.
It’s no surprise that these two corrupt top FBI officials had
an agency full of leakers.
The Inspector General found ZERO pro-Trump text
messages and ZERO anti-Hillary texts.
Every single agent working on Hillary Clinton’s email
investigation was pro-Hillary.
Every single agent working on the Russia investigation
was anti-Trump. That’s all you need to know.
 Dinesh D’Souza On IG Report: In America Today There
Are Quite A Few Criminals With Badges (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 14, 2018, 11:36 Pm

after MORE disgusting anti-Trump text

messages surfaced.
The five FBI employees have not been
named at this time.

On Thursday night filmmaker and author Dinesh D’Souza

joined Roger Steon on The Ingraham Angle.

Dinesh told Laura we must concede to a horrible new

reality in America.

Dinesh D’Souza: I think the American people like me are

arriving at the dismaying realization that in America today
there are quite a few criminals with badges. Now, growing
up as I did in India we had a lot of corruption and we knew
that there were criminals on the street and there were
criminals with badges. But the criminals with badges were
more dangerous because they don’t just violate the law
they corrupt the law.

Via The Ingraham Angle:

On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much anticipated
review on FBI and DOJ actions during
the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
The IG report found an institutionalized
corruption and bias and far left
operatives influencing policy
throughout the upper echelons of the
FBI.

Inspector General Horowitz referred

FIVE FBI employees for investigation
.

359
 President Trump On His Birthday Wish: “All I Want Is
For America To Be Successful” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 8:15 Am

President Donald Trump left the West The conversation covered trade, Russia, Comey and his
Wing on Friday morning and walked out 72nd birthday on Thursday.
on the White House lawn to talk with
FOX and Friends host Steve Doocy. President Trump told Steve,

The president spoke with Steve Doocy for a half hour. “All I want for my birthday is for
America to be successful.”

360
 President Trump On Leaker James Comey: They Seem Like
Criminal Acts To Me. What He Did Was Criminal (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 8:33 Am

President Donald Trump left the West Wing on Friday
morning and walked out on the White House lawn to talk
with FOX and Friends host Steve Doocy.
The president spoke with Steve Doocy for a half hour.
President Trump then went and spoke with liberal
mainstream reporters for another 20 minutes.
Well, look, I would never want to get
involved in that. Certainly, they really seem
like very criminal acts to me. What he did
was criminal. What he did was a terrible
thing to the people. What he did was so
bad in regard to our Constitution, in terms
of the well-being of our country. Should he
be locked up? Let somebody make a
determination. Look at all the dishonest
things that Crooked Hillary did. Look what’s
gone on. It’s very sad.

Steve Doocy:

Should James Comey be locked up?

President Trump:

361
 POTUS Trump: I Beat Bush Dynasty, I Beat Clinton
Dynasty, Now I’m Going To Beat Dishonest Intelligence
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 8:59 Am

President Donald Trump left the West Let’s hope so.

Wing on Friday morning and walked out
The liberal Justice Department is out of
on the White House lawn to talk with control.
FOX and Friends host Steve Doocy.

The president spoke with Steve Doocy for a half hour.

President Trump then went and spoke with liberal

mainstream reporters for another 20 minutes.

President Trump: I beat Clinton dynasty. I beat Bush

dynasty, and now, I guess, hopefully I’m in the process of
beating very dishonest intelligence.
.

362
 Trump Takes Out Top
Taliban Leader In Drone Strike
By Jacob Wohl
June 15, 2018, 9:24 Am

NATO also confirmed that Fazlullah was killed, in a

statement to Reuters early Thursday Morning.

The tracking down and killing of Fazlullah marks one of

the first manifestations of a US policy shift way from
bringing the Taliban to the table for negotiations and
towards killing their senior leadership. This shift seems to
have taken place exactly as General H.R. McMaster left
the White House and as John Bolton entered. In August
2017 National Security Adviser described Pakistan as

Fazlullah was killed in a US Drone Strike in the Afghan
province of Kunar Thursday morning, according to
Pakistani ISI Officials who spoke to the New York Times.
“Iran or North Korea on steroids”.
Pakistan does not support US drone strikes on terrorists
within or near their country, claiming that they threaten
their sovereignty.

A picture from AFP of Fazlullah from 2008

.

363
Boom! Trump Blasts Liberal Reporter On Talks With Kim
Jong-Un: “I Don’t Want To See A Nuclear Weapon
Destroy You And Your Family”
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 9:37 Am

President Donald Trump left the West

Wing on Friday morning and walked out
on the White House lawn to talk with
FOX and Friends host Steve Doocy.

The president spoke with Steve Doocy for a half hour.

President Trump then went and spoke with liberal

mainstream reporters for another 20 minutes.

During his interview with liberal reporters he was asked

about his kind words on Kim Jong-Un.

President Trump responded:

Reporter: You spoke passionately about

the circumstances that led to Otto
Warmbier’s death. In same breath, you’re
defending Kim Jong Un’s human rights
records. How can you do that?
Trump: “You know why? Because I don’t
want to see a nuclear weapon destroy you
and your family”
.

364
 WATCH=> Obama Lies On TV About Hillary Clinton’s
Private Email Server (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 10:09 Am

President Obama was one of a select

handful of individuals who had “direct
contact” with Hillary Clinton on her private
email account, Justice Department
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
indicated in his bombshell report Thursday
on the Clinton email probe.

In a footnote, the DOJ watchdog notes that

“FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us

that former President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama held an
was one of the 13 individuals with whom
interview with Steve Kroft from “60
Clinton had direct contact using her
Minutes” in October 2015.
clintonemail.com account.“
Kroft asked President Obama if he knew about Hillary
Clinton’s private email server.

Steve Kroft: Did you know about Hillary Clinton’s use of

a private email server?

Barack Obama: No… No.

We now know this was another Obama

lie.

Thanks to the release of the IG report on

Thursday we know that Barack Obama
had direct contact with Clinton on
private email server.

FOX News reported:

365
 VIDEO: CNN Pleads With Remaining Viewers
“We Are Not The Enemy Of The American People”
By Jacob Wohl
June 15, 2018, 10:52 Am

Following the tweet, Wolf Blitzer pleaded with CNN

viewers, saying “we love the American people” and “we
are not the enemy of the American people”.

WATCH:

President Trump’s criticism of the mainstream media,

which usually is met with scorn from leftists near and far,
was instead met with a plea for mercy this week from Wolf
Blitzer.

In a Wednesday Morning tweet, President Trump referred

to the Fake News media, “especially NBC and CNN”, as
“our country’s biggest enemy”.

366
 BREAKING: Federal Judge JAILS
Paul Manafort Citing Recent Obstruction Charges
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 10:53 Am
BREAKING NEWS.
Paul Manafort was sent to jail Friday.
Trump’s former campaign chair Paul Manafort was sent to
jail Friday.
Paul Manafort was hunted down by Robert Mueller
because of his connection to President Trump.
.
367
This type of witch hunt is what you see in Banana
Republics.
AP reported: BREAKING: Federal judge jails ex-Trump
campaign chair Paul Manafort ahead of trial, citing
recently filed obstruction charges.
Trump’s former campaign chairman
Paul Manafort was hit with a third
indictment by Robert Mueller last Friday
for ‘witness tampering.’
The Special Counsel accused Trump’s
former campaign chairman Paul
Manafort of attempting to tamper with
potential witnesses, in a court filing
Monday.
Dirty Cop Mueller raided Manafort’s
iCloud account to obtain phone records
and other documents.
This is another attempt to distract from the damning IG
report released Thursday.
This story is developing…please refresh page for updates.
BREAKING: Horowitz Confirms He Did NOT Recover All
‘Missing’ Strzok-Page Text Messages
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 11:51 Am

On Thursday, Inspector General Michael

Horowitz released his much-anticipated
report on FBI and DOJ actions during the
Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Although the report was well over 500 pages and took a
year and a half to produce, it is an incomplete
investigation.

Inspector General Horowitz confirmed Friday his staff was

unable to recover all of the ‘missing’ Strzok-Page text
messages from Dec. 15, 2016- May 17 2017.

BREAKING: IG Horowitz did not obtain or

examine ANY text messages from Justice
Department prosecutors involved in the
MidYearExam investigation of Clinton
emails …

Text messages from the Trump-hating FBI lovebirds

between December of 2016 all the way up until THE
DAY Mueller was appointed, May 17, 2017 mysteriously
went ‘missing.’ The FBI blamed it on a glitch.

Horowitz was able to recover a few text messages,

however; many are still ‘missing.’
Even worse, Horowitz did not obtain any text messages
from Justice Department prosecutors involved in Hillary’s
“MYE” investigation nor messages from Strzok’s Gmail
account.
BREAKING: IG Horowitz failed to obtain or
examine Strok’s emails from the gmail
account he used to conduct official FBI
business, including the Clinton and
Trump/Russia investigations

Follow this thread from investigative

reporter, Paul Sperry:

BREAKING: IG Horowitz confirms his staff

did not recover all of Strzok’s or Page’s text
messages from the December 15, 2016 –
May 17, 2017 “gap” period when FBI
suffered mysterious archiving”glitch” …

368
One text message from Strzok that was recovered in
Thursday’s IG report shocked the country.
Strzok sent his mistress a text message
saying “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming
President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for
consideration in Andy’s office…that there’s
.
369
no way [Trump] gets elected…but I’m afraid
we can’t take that risk,” Strzok text
messaged to Page in an Aug. 15, 2016
exchange, referring to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely
event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok
added.
Other profanity-laced text messages between Strzok and
Page showed their contempt for Donald Trump.
We must see the remaining text messages sent between
these two FBI officials; certainly they are damning
otherwise the department wouldn’t be working so hard to
conceal them from investigators.
 Lindsey Graham: If You Don’t Like
Me Working With President Trump…
I Don’t Give A Shi*T” (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 12:00 Pm

Senator Lindsey Graham went on CNN to discuss President Trump’s historic meetings with North Korean dictator
Kim Jong Un in Singapore.

Graham spoke with the US president after his talks with Jong-Un in Singapore.

The CNN hosts were not used to Graham praising President Trump.

That’s when Lindsey Graham snapped back at them.

Sen. Graham: “So if you don’t like me working with President Trump to make the world a better place, I don’t give a
sh*t.”

370
 Hah! Donald Trump Jr. Retweets
‘Sad Ben Rhodes – Presidential Birthday Remix”
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 12:20 Pm

Hah! Via Reddit The Donald:

President Donald Trump turned 72 on Thursday – the same

day as the IG report was released on Obama deep state
corruption.

For this special day Carpe Donktum released a special

presidential birthday video featuring Ben Rhodes.
This is hilarious!

Presidential son Don Jr. retweeted the

birthday wish.

371
 CRIMINAL IN A ROBE=>
Here’s The Rundown On The Corrupt Obama-Appointed
Judge Who Tossed Manafort In Jail
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 12:43 Pm
It sure seems like every Obama appointed
judge is a far left radical who puts their own
distorted interpretation of reality ahead of
the US Constitution. In this respect, US
District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is a
case study. This past week she again
showed that she puts politics before the law.
Her actions with Paul Manafort alone are
cause for her to be removed or impeached.
We reported two months ago and again earlier this month,
that Obama appointed liberal activist Judge, Amy Berman
Jackson, was assigned to the most important court case in
US history. Sadly, Judge Jackson has a horrible far left
record on the bench. In 2013 Judge Jackson rejected
arguments from the Catholic Church that Obamacare’s
requirements that employers provide cost free coverage to
contraceptive services is contrary to their religious beliefs
and violated their religious and free speech freedoms. This
was overturned by the Supreme Court.
372
In 2017 Judge Jackson dismissed the wrongful death suit
against Hillary Clinton filed by two of the families who
lost loved ones in Benghazi. The families argued that
Clinton had done little to help their sons and then lied to
cover it up.
Then on January 19th of this year, a Paul Manafort’s case
was reassigned to Judge Jackson on January 19th, a few
weeks after being filed.
It is unknown why she was assigned to this
case or by whom.
What is clear is that with her atrocious and slanted record
to date, the Deep State and the Mueller team certainly
wanted Judge Jackson overseeing the Manafort case and
this is supported by her record to date.
On January 3rdwe reported that Paul
Manafort filed a suit against the “Deep
State” DOJ (Jeff Sessions), Assistant AG
Rod Rosenstein and Corrupt Investigator
Robert Mueller that would possibly shut
down Mueller’s corrupt investigation!
We reported for months on the many criminal and corrupt
actions taken by numerous parties related to the Mueller
investigation. Mueller never should have taken on the job
in the first place due to numerous conflicts. He is best
friends with fired leaker and former FBI Director James
Comey. He met with Comey shortly before Comey
testified with Congress and stratigized with him. For this
alone he should have recused himself. The team Mueller
built to attack President Trump and have him removed is
all Deep State liberal attorneys and crooks. Mueller’s
record in the past is scattered with actions that let the
Clintons off scot-free on numerous occasions when they
should have been put in jail.
We now know that the FBI had an
investigation into the Clintons and moneys
they received from Russia in return for
giving Russia 20% of all US uranium.
Prior to the Obama administration approving the very
controversial Uranium One deal in 2010 handing Russia
20% of America’s Uranium, the FBI had evidence that
Russian nuclear industry officials were involved in
bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering in
order to benefit Vladimir Putin.
The FBI approved the deal anyway. We also
know that Rosenstein and Mueller were the
ones who allowed the Uranium One deal to
go forward. This was the real Russia
collusion story involving the US
government.
We know that Mueller’s team illegally obtained emails
related to the Trump transition team and these emails were
protected under attorney-client privilege. Mueller and his
entire team should have resigned after this.
Manafort’s case was solid but the judge was
Obama’s corrupt liberal Judge Jackson. On
April 27, 2018, Judge Jackson dismissed
Manafort’s plea.
It is very clear that Manafort’s argument was valid. There
is no crime in US law for collusion and Rosenstein’s order
allowing Mueller to look at whatever he wants was
challenged in another Manafort case that Mueller filed
against him in Virginia.
Judge T.S. Ellis blasted prosecutors, saying
he believes Robert Mueller is effectively
using the Paul Manafort case to provide
material that would lead to Trump’s
“prosecution or impeachment”. He also
condemned the investigation for having no
barriers.

But perhaps one of the most damning

aspects of the Mueller investigation is that it
is not legal. The corrupt Mueller
investigation is tasked with finding a crime
that does not exist in the law. It is a legal
impossibility. Mueller is being asked to do
something that is manifestly unattainable.

FOX News Legal Analyst Gregg Jarrett explained this in

an article last year that the entire Mueller investigation is
lawless.
Judge Jackson actually expressed concerns about Manafort
being indicted in two different courts. Far left liberal
To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with Politico even reported in February –
finding a crime that does not exist in the
law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being
… the judge also expressed some concern about “overlap”
asked to do something that is manifestly
between the Washington case and the Virginia one,
unattainable.
although she said ultimately the burden of two successive
trials is likely to fall most heavily on the defense.
Manafort sued the DOJ, Mueller and
Rosenstein because what they are doing is
“It seems the government is setting itself up to
not supported by US Law.
put on the same evidence twice in different
courtrooms,” Jackson said. “There’s a risk of
Manafort’s case also argued in paragraph 33 of its filing inconsistent [rulings] on the motions and
that the special counsel put in place by crooked Rosenstein evidentiary rulings and jury findings.”
gave crooked and criminal Mueller powers that are not
permitted by law. Mueller was given the latitude to
Ultimately, though, Jackson said she didn’t view the
investigate whatever he wanted to and that is not permitted
parallel cases as a big problem.
by the law. Manafort’s filing paragraph 33 stated –

“The burden is at its least on the courts. We can

But paragraph (b)(ii) of the Appointment Order purports to
grant Mr. Mueller further authority to investigate and
prosecute “any matters that arose or may arise directly
from the investigation.” That grant of authority is not
authorized by DOJ’s special counsel regulations. It is not a
“specific factual statement of the matter to be
investigated.” Nor is it an ancillary power to address
efforts to impede or obstruct investigation under 28 C.F.R.
§ 600.4(a).
handle two trials,” she said.
Prosecutor Greg Andres stressed that Mueller’s team gave
Manafort the option to face a single case in Washington on
all the charges, but Manafort declined to waive his right to
have the tax charges brought in Virginia, which is where
he lived when he filed the tax returns at issue.

373
 Manafort was smart in moving his case out
from under Judge Jackson to Virginia. It
looks like this move and having his case in
front of a judge not appointed by corrupt
Obama was a great move.
Judge Jackson is not only wrong in her judgements, she is
also overly abusive to Manafort. She scolded Manafort and
his team for a statement his spokesman issued maintaining
his innocence and said the comments appeared to run afoul
of the order she issued in November limiting public
statements about the case by lawyers involved and by the
defendants. Of course she says nothing about the many
leaks from the corrupt Mueller team.
Judge Jackson set the court date for Manafort’s case that
she oversees for mid-September, right before the mid-term
elections. Clearly she is trying to have this publicized and
negatively impact Republican chances in the election.
What a piece of rotten work!
In May Judge Jackson addressed another
argument from the Manafort team and
basically threw it out as well. (There’s no
way Manafort is getting a fair trial with
Judge Jackson overseeing his case.)
A federal judge delivered a setback to President Trump’s
former campaign chairman Paul Manafort on Friday by
.
refusing to throw out some of the criminal charges against
him.
Manafort’s legal team had argued in a Washington, D.C.,
court that he was being charged twice for the same offense
of lying to federal officials. Manafort maintained that the
stacking up charges could negatively influence a jury
against him, The Associated Press reported.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, however, said
in a ruling Friday that any harm or prejudice Manafort
could face would be handled by giving the jury “proper”
instructions, according to the AP.
The judge dismissed the motion from Manafort without
prejudice, meaning he can revisit it after his trial in the
case, which is scheduled for September, the AP noted.
On Friday the Criminal in a Robe tossed Paul Manafort in
jail.
His crime was to participate in the Trump campaign.
Do not fool yourself. The Democrats and
their minions are cheering this.
And they would cheer just as loud if it was
you.

374
 IG Report: FBI Agents Found Huma Abedin Deleting
Classified/Hillary Emails From Yahoo Account But Failed
To Subpoena Her Devices
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 1:08 Pm
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz released his much-anticipated
report on FBI and DOJ actions during the
Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the Inspector General, FBI agents found
Huma Abedin deleting classified/Hillary Clinton emails
from her Yahoo account but failed to subpoena her
devices.
Huma forwarded State Department passwords and
classified emails to this Yahoo account before it was
hacked by foreign agents and the FBI did nothing. Let that
sink in.
In late December, the State Department released a portion
of the documents found on pervert Anthony Weiner’s
laptop and at least 5 emails contain classified information.
The FBI seized Weiner’s laptop after he was caught
sexting with an underage teenager and discovered
375
CLASSIFIED INFORMATION on the disgraced
politician’s computer.
It turns out Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin
forwarded sensitive State Department emails to all of her
insecure Yahoo email accounts which were later hacked by
foreign actors. Among the foreign agents that hacked
Huma’s Yahoo emails included RUSSIANS.
According to The Daily Caller, the three email accounts
Abedin used were abedinh@state.gov,
huma@clintonemail.com, and humamabedin@yahoo.com.
Now this…
Paul Sperry: BREAKING: FBI agents found Abedin
deleting classified & Clinton emails from her Yahoo
account but failed to subpoena her devices. If they had,
maybe they wouldn’t have had to reopen the case in 11th
hour when NY agents found work emails on the laptop she
shared w her perv husband.
There’s more…
FROM IG REPORT:
“[T]he Midyear team did not obtain search
warrants to examine the content of emails in
Mills’s or Abedin’s private email accounts
and did not seek to obtain any of the senior
aides’ personal devices.”
WTF?!
 As previously reported, then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew
McCabe knew about Hillary’s emails on Weiner’s laptop
as early as September of 2016 and didn’t alert the bureau
for an entire MONTH.

The FBI waited over a month to obtain a warrant to review

emails on Weiner’s laptop.

President Trump even called for Huma to be jailed back in

January.

The Inspector General said,

“In assessing Strzok’s decision to prioritize the

Russia investigation over following up on the
Midyear-related investigative lead discovered
on the Weiner laptop in October, 2016, these
text messages led us to conclude that we did
not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was
free from bias.”
This once again proves if you are Hillary Clinton or her
aides, either the devices will not be subpoenaed or if they
are, you can destroy them with hammers and BleachBit
without fear of reprisal.

376
 POTUS Trump Reacts To Manafort Arrest ‘What About
Comey And Crooked Hillary?’
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 1:46 Pm
President Trump’s former campaign chair
Paul Manafort was sent to jail Friday.
The Obama-appointed, criminal-in-a-robe,
Judge Amy Berman Jackson sent Manafort
to jail citing recent obstruction charges.
Paul Manafort was hunted down by Robert Mueller
because of his connection to President Trump.
Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul
Manafort was hit with a third indictment by
Robert Mueller last Friday for ‘witness
tampering.’
The Special Counsel accused Trump’s
former campaign chairman Paul Manafort of
attempting to tamper with potential
witnesses, in a court filing Monday.
377
Dirty Cop Mueller raided Manafort’s iCloud
account to obtain phone records and other
documents.
Mueller and his team of liberal hacks are roving outside of
the original point of the Special Counsel which is why
Rosenstein is fighting like hell to conceal his memo
detailing Mueller’s scope.
Manafort’s alleged crimes go back over a decade, yet
Mueller, with his unlimited time and resources is hunting
down Trump’s former campaign chair with a vengeance.
President Trump reacted to the news of Manafort’s arrest
on Friday.
Trump tweeted: Wow, what a tough sentence for Paul
Manafort, who has represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole
and many other top political people and campaigns. Didn’t
know Manafort was the head of the Mob. What about
Comey and Crooked Hillary and all of the others? Very
unfair!
So Manafort goes to jail on “obstruction” charges and
Hillary Clinton walks free even though she destroyed
devices that were under subpoena with hammers.
Comey is also not in prison even though he leaked
classified memos to the media.
PAGING AG SESSIONS!
 ‘Morning Joe’: Comey Is
The Reason Trump Is President
Mike Brest | Contributor
2:12 PM 06/15/2018

“Donald Trump himself will not admit that James

MSNBC’s morning host Joe Scarborough suggested that the
inspector general’s report proves that former FBI Director James
Comey’s actions actually helped President Trump during the
election.
Comey, who he loathes, is the reason why he’s
president of the United States,” Morning Joe
stated.
“See, the IG report again, for those that are just
tuning in, or for those who are too slow to
actually operate household appliances, the
bottom line of this report is that James Comey
and FBI agents held on to evidence of Anthony
Weiner’s laptop for a month, said they didn’t
have time to actually look at it,” Scarborough
continued. “And so they waited a month and
then sent that letter 10 days before the election,
guaranteeing that it would destroy Hillary
Clinton’s campaign.”

WATCH: The inspector general’s report showed previously unreleased text

messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, in
which Strzok said,

“No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

“If we’re looking at what actually happened after
some text messages were sent, that’s what
happened and it accrued solely to the benefit of
Donald J. Trump,” he concluded.

378
 SICK. Joe Scarborough Compares US Law Enforcement
To Nazis Who Kill Children — White House
Responds (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 2:13 Pm
This is the modern day left — Completely
unhinged.
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough on Friday compared US law
enforcement officers to Nazis.
The Morning Joe host compared US law enforcement
officials to Nazis marching children to the showers.
Joe Scarborough: I know children are being marched
away to showers. I know they’re being marched away to
showers, being told they are just like the Nazis.
Via Morning Joe:
379
The Trump White House later today released a statement
in response to the appalling statement by Joe Scarborough:
WH statement responding To Joe Scarborough’s
outrageous and despicable slander and smear of federal
law enforcement officers. Statement is attributable to
Deputy White House Press Secretary Hogan Gidley:
“It is appalling that Joe Scarborough would
compare sworn federal law enforcement
officers— who put their lives on the line
every day to keep American people safe— to
Nazis.
This is the type of inflammatory and unacceptable rhetoric
that puts a target on the backs of our great law
enforcement. It is also horribly insulting to the memory of
the 6 million Jews who perished in the Nazi Holocaust.
Not only is Scarborough’s rhetoric shameful, but his facts
are categorically false. When American citizens break the
law, they are separated from their children and prosecuted.
It’s unclear why Scarborough believes that
illegal aliens are entitled to more rights than
those afforded to American citizens.
While Scarborough is quick to launch into his straight-to-
camera outrage over the temporary separation of illegal
alien families, he has never shown similar outrage for the
permanent separation of American families forever torn
apart from their children, who were killed by criminal
aliens as a result of Democrats’ open borders policies. If
Joe Scarborough actually cared about keeping illegal alien
families together, he would use his platform to support the
Trump Administration’s efforts to close loopholes in
federal immigration law.” – Hogan Gidley
 Breaking: DEEP STATE Scrubbed
Obama’s Name From FBI Report On Hillary’s Emails
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 2:56 Pm

Scandal-free president had name

scrubbed from James Comey’s report
on Hillary

Thanks for a Friday night news dump last September, we

knew that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was emailing
back-and-forth with President Obama using her private
email address routed through her homebrew server. Don’t
worry about national security, though: Obama used a
pseudonym that not even Huma Abedin knew, so it was all
very secure.

That fact came up Thursday with the release of the OIG

Thanks to the release of the IG report on
Thursday we know that Barack Obama
had direct contact with Clinton on
private email server.
FOX News reported:
report, but with a new twist: according to the report,
Clinton “used her private email extensively while outside
the United States, including from the territory of
sophisticated adversaries,” but the fact that she was
corresponding with the president was scrubbed from James
Comey’s exoneration.

President Obama was one of a select handful of individuals David French tweets screenshots from the IG report:
who had “direct contact” with Hillary Clinton on her
private email account, Justice Department Inspector
General Michael Horowitz indicated in his bombshell
report Thursday on the Clinton email probe.

In a footnote, the DOJ watchdog notes that

“FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us

that former President Barack Obama
was one of the 13 individuals with whom
Clinton had direct contact using her
clintonemail.com account.“

But the Obama DOJ hid this from the

American public.

In fact, the Obama Deep State scrubbed

Obama’s name from the FBI report on
Hillary Clinton’s email investigation.

100% Fed Up reported on this stunning revelation from the

IG report.
Via Twitchy.

380
Sean Davis tweeted: Obama knew about Hillary’s secret e-
mail scheme, because she e-mailed him using her private
address “while in the territory of a foreign adversary.”
That finding was removed from Comey’s statement
exonerating Clinton.

381
 Hugh Hewitt: Trump’s Victory Would Have Been Even
Bigger If Voters Knew About FBI Bias
Mike Brest | Contributor
3:43 PM 06/15/2018

“It is clear that if what was now known

because of the inspector general’s report
was known prior to the election, President
Trump would’ve won by an even greater
margin in the electoral college and perhaps
the popular vote. The report is that
damning,” Hewitt stated.

The inspector general’s report on former FBI Director Jim

Comey’s actions while heading the FBI was released
Thursday and showed improper actions on his part.

“The intrusion analysis on Secretary

Hugh Hewitt said Friday on his radio show that President
Donald Trump would have won by even larger margins
had the inspector general’s report been issued prior to the
election.
Clinton’s server summarized on pages at
75-76 shows indeed there was at least one
compromise of the server that was
discovered,” he continued. “There is the
conclusion that sophisticated foreign
adversaries could cover their tracks in and
out of the server and the draft of the report
by former FBI Director Comey the first draft
went from concluding that it was
‘reasonably likely’ that hostile actors had
invaded the server to the final draft that it
was ‘possible.'”

382
 Clapper: US Intel Identified Suspect In
Kremlin-Wikileaks Transfer Of DNC Emails
Chuck Ross | Reporter
5:47 PM 06/15/2018
Former director of national intelligence James Clapper
says U.S. intelligence officials last year identified a person
suspected of transferring thousands of hacked DNC emails
to Wikileaks on behalf of the Russian government.
“We had a suspect,” Clapper told Yahoo!
News’ Michael Isikoff in an interview for the
“Skullduggery” podcast.
Clapper, who left government on Jan. 20, 2017, said that
by the time he left office, U.S. officials had identified a
“cut-out” selected by Russian intelligence to pass nearly
20,000 stolen DNC emails to Wikileaks in April 2016.
Clapper said of the cut-out’s identity that U.S. intelligence
officials were “pretty confident at the time but not
sufficient enough to publicize it.”
“I don’t know whether the suspicions we
had at the time were conveyed [to Justice
Department special counsel Robert
Mueller] or whether they were validated,”
he told Isikoff.
Clapper’s comments mark the first indication that the U.S.
government identified a suspect in the DNC email hack.
.
383
Wikileaks released the DNC emails on July 22, 2016,
during the Democratic National Convention. The
documents served to fracture the Democratic party because
they showed that top DNC officials appeared to favor
Hillary Clinton over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, has denied that
he received the emails from the Russian government.
“Our source is not the Russian
government,” Assange told Fox News’
Sean Hannity in a Jan. 3, 2017 interview.
But Clapper told Isikoff that the Russian government used
a cut-out in order to ensure Assange “plausible
deniability.”
“In April, Russia used a third party ‘cut-out’
to send more than 19,000 DNC emails and
more than 8,000 documents to WikiLeaks
and Julian Assange, attempting to cover its
tracks and to give WikiLeaks some degree
of deniability in knowing the source of the
leaks,” Clapper wrote in his new book,
“Facts and Fears: Hard Truths From a Life
in Intelligence.”
Wikileaks also released thousands of emails stolen from
Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The
website began publishing the documents in October 2016.
Clapper did not suggest that the Trump campaign was
aware of the Kremlin and Wikileaks’ activities. He has
regularly stated that he saw no “smoking gun evidence” of
Trump campaign collusion when he worked in
government.
Seems Rational=> MSNBC: Law Enforcement Officers Are
Nazis And Trump Is Running Concentration Camps
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 7:13 Pm

Later in the day on Friday MSNBC hosts

accused the Trump Campaign of
running concentration camps.

This is the modern day left —

Completely unhinged.

Friday morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Show host Joe

Scarborough on Friday compared US law enforcement This is the modern day left.
officers to Nazis.
Absolutely unhinged.
The Morning Joe host compared US law
enforcement officials to Nazis marching
children to the showers.

Joe Scarborough: I know children are being marched

away to showers. I know they’re being marched away to
showers, being told they are just like the Nazis.

Via Morning Joe:

384
Prosecutor Who Petitioned To Put Paul Manafort In Prison
Attended Hillary Clinton’s Election Night Party
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 7:39 Pm

In 2017 Judge Jackson dismissed the wrongful death suit

against Hillary Clinton filed by two of the families who
lost loved ones in Benghazi. The families argued that
Clinton had done little to help their sons and then lied to
cover it up.

And now this…

The Mueller prosecutor who petitioned

Judge Jackson to throw Manafort in jail
attended Hillary Clinton’s election night
party.

Via Tucker Carlson Tonight:

On Friday the Obama-appointed Federal
Judge Amy Berman Jackson tossed
former Trump campaign manager Paul
Manafort in jail.

Judge Jackson has a horrible far left record on the bench.

In 2013 Judge Jackson rejected arguments from the
Catholic Church that Obamacare’s requirements that
employers provide cost free coverage to contraceptive
services is contrary to their religious beliefs and violated
their religious and free speech freedoms. This was
overturned by the Supreme Court.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s right-hand man, Andrew

Weissmann, was accused of using “corrupt legal
practices,” and withholding evidence in a previous case
involving the Colombo crime family, reported Fox News
contributor Sara A. Carter.

385
James Clapper Now Claims US Intel Identified A “Suspect”
Who Transferred DNC Emails To Wikileaks
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 7:59 Pm
Former Intel Chief and criminal leaker,
James Clapper now claims US Intel
officials last year “identified a suspect”
who transferred the stolen DNC emails
to WikiLeaks.
The DNC emails were ‘hacked’ two years ago and Clapper
left his post in January of 2017 and this is the first time he
publicly claimed US intel identified a suspected.
In an interview with Trump-hating Yahoo! reporter,
Michael Isikoff, former Intel Chief James Clapper claimed
U.S. intelligence officials last year identified a “suspect”
who served as the “cut-out” for Russian intelligence to
funnel thousands of Democratic National Committee
emails and documents to WikiLeaks,
In an interview with Yahoo News podcast “Skullduggery,”
Clapper said Intel officials were “pretty confident” they
identified a middleman for the hacked DNC and Podesta
emails. Clapper gave zero details about the suspect.
“We had a suspect. I don’t know whether
the suspicions we had at the time were
conveyed [to Justice Department special
counsel Robert Mueller] or whether they
were validated.” U.S. intelligence officials
were “pretty confident at the time but not
sufficient enough to publicize it,” he said.
386
WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange stated many times
publicly the Russian government did not give him the
hacked DNC emails.
Clapper says a “cut-out” or third party individual was used
purposefully so Julian Assange could plausibly deny the
Russians were the ones who handed him the hacked DNC
emails.
“In April, Russia used a third party ‘cut-out’
to send more than 19,000 DNC emails and
more than 8,000 documents to WikiLeaks
and Julian Assange, attempting to cover its
tracks and to give WikiLeaks some degree
of deniability in knowing the source of the
leaks.”
James Clapper then went full
conspiracy theory nut job and implied
the Trump campaign and the Russians
were one big echo chamber.
Clapper claimed Trump slamming Hillary for her health
problems and scandals came from the Russians.
Unbelievable.
“There is striking — I found, we found,
parallelism between what the [Trump]
campaign was doing and saying and what
the Russians were doing and saying. It was
almost like an echo chamber, particularly
with respect to Hillary Clinton personally,
and her alleged scandals and her alleged
maladies, physical and mental. There were
a lot of very similar themes that came
ultimately from the Russians and the
campaign.”
The irony of Clapper telling Michael Isikoff the Trump
campaign and Russians were one big echo chamber.
Isikoff’s Sept 2016 article on Carter Page was used to
corroborate the Russia dossier to justify a spy warrant, in
one big echo chamber of lies.
WikiLeaks released the first round of DNC emails in July
of 2016 during the Democrat National Convention which
caused a schism in the Dem party after it was revealed the
DNC was working in favor of Hillary over the highly
popular Bernie Sanders.
WikiLeaks then dropped an October surprise on Hillary
Clinton by publishing emails from her campaign chair,
John Podesta.
WikiLeaks hammered Clapper on Friday
in a pair of tweets for his false claims.
“Clapper gets literally everything wrong,”
tweeted WikiLeaks.

To this day, the FBI has not done a forensic inspection of

the DNC server so we still have no proof the server was
even hacked, and if hacked, by whom?

James Clapper has state publicly that he saw no “smoking

gun evidence” Trump colluded with the Russians during
the 2016 election.

“Clapper admits he doesn’t know who our

sources are,” said WikiLeaks

387
 Wikileaks Moves In With Kill
Shot After Crooked Hillary Trolls Comey
By Cristina Laila
June 15, 2018, 8:57 Pm

Crooked Hillary Clinton trolled Comey

from her Twitter account Thursday
afternoon after the IG report revealed
Comey used a Gmail account to
conduct FBI business.
Hillary tweeted: “But my emails.”

WikiLeaks utterly destroyed Crooked Hillary Clinton

Friday.

WikiLeaks did a lot of damage to Hillary Clinton’s

campagin after they disseminated the DNC emails and
Podesta emails during the 2016 election.

The other half of Hillary’s emails from her private server

where she innocently discussed Chelsea’s wedding and
Yoga were destroyed with BleachBit.

Congressman DeSantis reminded Hillary of that on

Thursday in an epic smackdown.
In a grotesque display of unabated hubris, Hillary Clinton
tweeted,

“But my emails.”

WikiLeaks moved in with a kill shot early Friday morning.

“They’re here–at least the half you didn’t

manage to destroy,” tweeted WikiLeaks
with a link to an archive of Hillary’s emails
from her private server when she was
Secretary of State.
.

388
 Atlanta Fed Raises Estimate Of
Second Quarter GDP Growth To 4.8%
By Jim Hoft
June 15, 2018, 9:02 Pm

GDPNow is not an official forecast of the Atlanta Fed.

Rather, it is best viewed as a running estimate of real GDP
growth based on available data for the current measured
quarter. There are no subjective adjustments made to
GDPNow—the estimate is based solely on the
mathematical results of the model.

Recent forecasts for the GDPNow model are available

More good news…
The Atlanta Fed raised their estimate of second quarter
GDP growth to 4.8%.
The growth rate of real gross domestic product (GDP) is a
key indicator of economic activity, but the official estimate
is released with a delay. Our GDPNow forecasting model
provides a “nowcast” of the official estimate prior to its
release by estimating GDP growth using a methodology
similar to the one used by the U.S. Bureau of Economic
Analysis.
here. More extensive numerical details—including
underlying source data, forecasts, and model parameters—
are available as a separate spreadsheet.
Latest forecast: 4.8 percent — June 14,
2018
The GDPNow model estimate for real
GDP growth (seasonally adjusted
annual rate) in the second quarter of
2018 is 4.8 percent on June 14, up from
4.6 percent on June 8.
After this morning’s retail sales release from the U.S.
Census Bureau, the nowcast of second-quarter real
personal consumption expenditures growth increased from
3.4 percent to 3.6 percent.

.
389
 Paul Manafort May See Life In Prison! He Dared To Lead
Presidential Campaign Against Hillary Clinton,
Now He Must Pay
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 8:18 Am
Dirty Cop Robert Mueller and his mob of
13 angry Democrats don’t play.
On Friday top Mueller prosecutor
Andrew Weissmann, a crooked attorney
and staunch Hillary Clinton supporter
who attended her election night party,
petitioned the court to toss Manafort in
prison.
Obama-appointed Federal Judge Amy
Berman Jackson agreed with Weissman
and tossed former Trump campaign
manager Paul Manafort in jail.
The Mueller witch hunt charged Manafort with dozens of
financial crimes that took place up to 12 years ago.
Manafort should have expected this.
In today’s American justice system if
.
390
you oppose the political elites this is
what you get.
Prison for life.
The Hill reported:
Former Watergate prosecutor Nick
Akerman said on Friday that Paul Manafort
may never again “see the outside of a jail
cell” after his house arrest arrangement
was revoked on Friday.
President Trump’s former campaign
chairman appeared in court after special
counsel Robert Mueller asked a judge to
revoke his pretrial release conditions,
accusing him of attempting to tamper with
potential witnesses.
During the hearing, the judge revoked Manafort’s bail and
ordered him to jail.
“Just to put this in historical perspective,
what broke the Watergate case was when
James McCord got a 25-year sentence,”
Akerman said when asked about the
hearing while appearing on MSNBC’s
“Velshi & Ruhle.” “He was one of the
Watergate burglars. He got a 25-year
sentence. He was sitting in jail because
that’s what made him crack and
cooperate.”
But Akerman noted that Manafort, who is 69 years old,
could soon be facing life in jail.
 HERE IT IS: The Top 10 Different Reasons
The IG’s Report On The Clinton Email ‘Matter’ Is Flawed
– Obama’s Deep State Runs Deep
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 9:17 Am
We reported in January that “DOJ
Inspector General Michael Horowitz Has
the Potential to Be the Greatest
Inspector in US History – He Also Could
Be Deep State Hack”.
We received the answer this Thursday
and our verdict – Although the IG’s
report includes some obvious and
already released information about the
criminal actions of Hillary Clinton and
Obama’s DOJ and FBI, it overall fails in
many respects to share an accurate
story. Therefore, based on the report,
our assessment is that the DOJ’s IG is
just another Deep State Hack!
We reported in January –
Many in the media are getting excited about the upcoming
release of the IG’s report into his investigation of abuses at
the DOJ. But if it turns out that Horowitz is part of the
deep state, the report may be disappointing.
Is IG Horowitz a Good Guy?
There’s reason to believe that Horowitz is a good guy. Last
week Horowitz announced that he located the text
messages after the FBI said they were lost –
In a letter to congressional leaders, Inspector General
Michael Horowitz said his office “succeeded in using
forensic tools” to recover messages between senior FBI
agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page during a key
five-month period ending the day special counsel Robert
Mueller III was appointed to investigate possible
coordination between the Kremlin and Trump’s campaign.
391
The missing messages have sparked a political firestorm in
recent days, as GOP leaders and the president have
questioned how the FBI failed to retain them.
Mueller hired both Strzok and Page on his team of Trump-
Russia investigators. They were part of the biased group
of far left Obama and Clinton supporters hired by Mueller.
Strzok was removed from the team after his text messages
were selected in an investigation carried out by the IG.
When identified, the IG notified Mueller who then
removed Strzok from his team. The claim was that Strzok
was biased against President Trump and removed didn’t
hold water because Mueller’s whole team was that way.
We now know that the text messages between lovers
Strzok and Page are filled with evidence of more sinister
actions involving protecting Hillary Clinton from the
crimes she committed and framing President Trump for the
crimes he didn’t commit.
IG Horowitz has taken actions to date related to Strzok text
messages that appear to show that he is a good guy. But
what is missing?
Is IG Horowitz a Bad Guy?
Horowitz was nominated by President Obama in July 2011
to be Inspector General of the DOJ. Before this he was at
Harvard where he was groomed by the likes of individuals
like former corrupt US Representative Barney Frank.
Prior to working in private practice, Mr. Horowitz worked
in DOJ from 1991 to 2002. In the early 1990s, he worked
for former fired FBI Director Comey while the two of
them were in the Southern District of New York.
The fact that Horowitz was IG at the DOJ
since 2012 under the Obama
Administration is concerning.
There is no evidence that he ordered an inspection into AG
Lynch when it was reported that she met with President
Clinton on a tarmac in 2016 and then a week later when
Hillary Clinton was given a pass by crooked FBI Director
Comey. We don’t know that the IG looked into any
number of Obama era crimes and corrupt actions. We
don’t know that he looked into the reasons for why the
DOJ is delaying emails and documents to Congress or
Judicial Watch concerning scandals during the Obama
years. The biggest and highest risk areas of the Obama era
were never touched or never had any issues identified and
reported to the public.
When crooked Rod Rosenstein was in front of Congress he
kept referring to the IG’s pending report into the DOJ and
Rosenstein acted as if he knew that IG Horowitz was going
to give him and the DOJ a pass.
IG Horowitz stated that he has located all the text
messages that the FBI reported as missing but we really
don’t know yet whether that is true. We also don’t know
what is in his report into DOJ abuse. Yesterday Horowitz
cancelled his meeting in front of Congress today after
Congress sent the four page FISA report to the President
for release. Did the IG cancel because he has to determine
what is in the FISA memo so that his investigation’s report
is not too far out of line?
Time will tell but odds would suggest
that Horowitz is just another deep state
hack. Obama was so corrupt! Drain the
swamp!
Others were more optimistic than we
were about the IG and his report and
now we know that we were right!
Horowitz and his team are Deep State!
Here is a list of 10 Reasons from
Thursday’s report that support our
conclusion –
392
1. In the IG’s Report whenever the IG found it necessary
to address the judgements, decisions and
interpretations of the law, the IG sides with the FBI,
DOJ and Clinton team every time. Horowitz and team
show an effort to side with these entities and their
actions and even provide excuses rather than disagree
with their obvious flawed decisions and actions.
In the Executive Summary on page ii alone the IG says –
We found that the prosecutors provided justifications…We
found that one of the reasons for not using the grand jury
for testimony involved concerns about exposing grand
jurors to classified information…We found that the
reasons for not doing so were based on limitations…We
found that these decisions were occurring at a time when
Comey and the Midyear team had already concluded that
there was likely no prosecutable case and believed it was
unlikely the culling laptops would change the outcome of
the investigation…We found that, by the date of her
interview, the Midyear team and Comey had concluded
that the evidence did not support criminal charges…We
found no persuasive evidence that Mills’s or Samuelson’s
presence influenced Clinton’s interview.”
2. The IG’s response to the rationale of the FBI making a
decision to not to bring Hillary to court for maintaining
classified emails on her private server is severely
flawed. The IG writes on page iv of the Executive
Summary –
They concluded that Section 793(f)(1) likely required a
state of mind that was “so gross as to almost suggest
deliberate intention,” criminally reckless, or “something
that falls just short of being willful,” as well as evidence
that the individuals who sent emails containing classified
information “knowingly” included or transferred such
information onto unclassified systems.”
Even the far-left New York Times reported
that the law doesn’t require intent –
The relevant statute places a special burden on public
officials to safeguard national secrets, making it a crime to
remove national defense information from its “proper
place of custody” even through mere “gross negligence.”
There is no requirement of finding specific intent.
3. The IG notes on page ii reports that the FBI in the
Hillary investigation –
Sought to obtain evidence whenever possible through
consent but also used compulsory process, including grand
jury subpoenas, search warrants, and 2703(d) orders (court
orders for non-content email information) to obtain various
evidence. We found that the prosecutors provided
justifications for the preference for consent that were
supported by Department and FBI policy and practice;
However, a former FBI Agent stated in 2017 that –
Never, I repeat never, in my 25-year career have I or any
FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case
without the use of a federal grand jury, federal grand jury
subpoenas, search warrants, etc.
Search warrants and/or subpoenas should have been
executed at Clinton’s residences in Chappaqua and
Washington and at Platte River.
The fact that this is coming out now is shocking.
Why did the FBI and IG until now
withhold information that subpoenas
were used in the Hillary investigation
and what was subpoenaed?
When was it subpoenaed? Why was the IG ok with the
fact that Hillary was never subpoenaed in front of a jury?
Why is the IG not more transparent on this new issue?
4. The IG ends up agreeing with the FBI’s story
regarding Hillary’s emails and ignores the
significance of some of the emails found on her
server. The IG glosses over the fact that some of the
emails on Hillary’s server were of the highest of
classification categories. Documents like these are
maintained in super controlled environments where an
individual must have top clearance to review. Why
does the IG seem to ignore this fact?
5. The IG noted that he and his team did not recover all of
the corrupt Strzok and Page text messages. A few
months ago when Congress requested the text
messages, the corrupt DOJ and FBI delayed and
delayed and then finally shared some of the messages.
Then when pressed corrupt AG Sessions’ DOJ and FBI
announced that the text messages had be deleted and
they no longer had them. When that happened the
question was raised, why did IG Horowitz not
announce that he didn’t receive them? A short time
later the IG announced that he had the Strzok and
Page texts.
393
Now we find out in the (highly unlikely and questionable)
report from the IG that he does not have any more of the
Strzok – Page texts.
It is simply unbelievable that the IG and
his team did not have all the texts at
some point in the investigation and if
they did not have them, why was
Congress not fully disclosed to this
fact?
6. When the IG discusses the meeting in Arizona between
impeached President Bill Clinton and Obama’s AG
Lynch he neglects to highlight that the only emails
released related to the meeting from FBI agents didn’t
question the reasonableness of the meeting. Emails
released since that date requested by Judicial Watch
show the FBI was only interested in finding out who
reported the meeting, not why the meeting occurred or
the legality of the meeting with the Hillary ‘matter’ in the
works at that time.
Judicial Watch today released 29 pages of Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI) documents related to the June 27,
2016, tarmac meeting between former Attorney General
Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton.
The documents show that FBI officials
were more concerned about leaks than
the actual meeting itself. The new
documents also show that then-FBI
Director Comey seemed to learn of the
meeting from news reports.
7. Conflicts of interest are all over the report but the
IG states that they did not influence the
investigation which clearly is not the case. Due to
the significance of the Clinton scandal all prejudices in
actuality or appearance should have been eliminated
but they were not. The result was the Hillary ‘matter’
was a sham. The IG states on p iii of the Executive
Summary –
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number
of important areas between Midyear agents and
prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or
testimonial evidence that improper considerations,
including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed.
8. The IG mentions emails obtained from Weiner’s
laptop but stays away from the contents of these
emails. The laptop held by Anthony Weiner, the
spouse of Hillary’s top aid, Huma Abedin was obtained
by the FBI with a reported 340,000 Clinton emails
going back to 2007. What the hell was in
those emails?
 9. The IG in his report overlooks the actions of the FBI and make edits. Did it take so long to cover up the
and DOJ that clearly were more about perception than truth?
adhering to the law. For example from page xi of the
Executive Summary –

Lynch, Yates, Axelrod, and their staffs had several

discussions that same day as to whether Lynch or Yates
should call Comey directly, but said they ultimately
decided to have Axelrod communicate “the strong view
that neither the DAG nor [AG] felt this letter should go
out.” Yates told us they were concerned that direct contact
with Comey would be perceived as “strongarming” him,
and that based on her experience with Comey, he was
likely to “push back hard” against input from Lynch or her,
especially if accepting their input meant that he had to go
back to his staff and explain that he was reversing his
decision. She said that she viewed Rybicki as the person
they needed to convince if they wanted to change Comey’s
mind. Accordingly, Axelrod informed Rybicki on October
27 of the Department’s strong opposition to Comey’s plan
to send a letter.

With Obama everything was always a production.

10. Finally, one overall question on the IG report is why

was it slow walked for so long before being
provided to the public? This alone adds more
questions to the overall soundness of the report as the The Deep State runs deep.
Deep State was allowed more time to review the report
.

394
 EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Man Shuts Down Hoover Dam In
Armored Vehicle Demanding Release Of Full IG Report
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 11:39 Am

on Friday, prompting authorities to stop traffic and

evacuate the area.

According to the Arizona Department of Public Safety, the

man has been identified as Matthew P. Wright, 30.

The Hoover Dam is a popular tourist destination, as it is

where the Nevada and Arizona state lines meet. Tourists
who were visiting the dam on Friday took to social media
to talk about how they were being evacuated from the area
as a result of Wright stopping an armored vehicle on the
bridge.

Exclusive video from Laura Loomer.

On Friday, June 15, 2018, Matthew Wright barricaded

himself inside an armored truck on the Hoover Dam.

Matthew Wright demanded the full release of the OIG

Report. He held signs in his window for “Mr. President”
Trump.

He added,

“We the people demand full disclosure.”

Wright is now in custody after he barricaded himself in a

makeshift armored truck on the Hoover Dam.

Mr. Wright stopped on the highway near the Mike

O’Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge around noon
.

395
Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Lashes Out At POTUS Trump
‘Americans Deserve A President Who
Is Honest And Ethical’
By Cristina Laila
June 16, 2018, 1:10 Pm

Former CIA Director-turned-Twitter-troll,

John Brennan lashed out at President
Trump on Saturday.
‘Americans deserve a President who is
honest, ethical, selfless, and
substantive,’ Brennan tweeted to
President Trump.

John Brennan lashed out at the President, accusing Trump

of not having a scintilla of decency left in him.

And Brennan expects us to believe he and his fellow

Trump-haters in the Intel community didn’t target Trump
with their resources.

Brennan tweeted: All Americans—not just your

President Trump stuck up for his
supporters in a tweet on Saturday
morning after the IG report revealed top
FBI brass disparaged Trump supporters
as ‘retarded, pathetic, uneducated
pieces of sh*t.’
supporters—deserve a President who is honest, ethical,
selfless, & substantive. Our country faces daunting
domestic & international challenges. If there is a scintilla
of decency left in you, you would focus on your
responsibilities, not on yourself.
John Brennan is in hot water which is why he continues to
lash out at President Trump from his Twitter account.

The President praised his ‘loyal, hardworking, smart’ base
Saturday morning.
Trump tweeted: My supporters are the smartest,
strongest, most hard working and most loyal that we have
seen in our countries history. It is a beautiful thing to
watch as we win elections and gather support from all over
the country. As we get stronger, so does our country. Best
numbers ever!
.
Brennan is caught in a perjury trap over his statements
about Hillary’s phony dossier in a May 2017 testimony to
the intel panel.
Obama’s former CIA chief was also involved in setting up
Russian espionage traps for minor players in Trump’s
camp, according the investigative reporter, Paul Sperry.

396
 Sick! 71% Of Liberals Don’t Want Peace With North
Korea Because Trump Would Gain Popularity
By Jacob Wohl
June 16, 2018, 1:36 Pm

Michelle Wolf, a comedian who is best known for

receiving bipartisan condemnation after her lambasting of President Trump’s 2020 Campaign Manager Brad Pascale
Sarah Huckabee Sanders at the White House tweeted about the poll, saying
Correspondent’s Dinner, conducted a snap survey of her
viewers on the issue of North Korea.
“Here is the media’s and left’s position in a
nutshell. It isn’t about America.”
In the live TV poll taken during Wolfe’s Netflix show,
71% of her mostly liberal audience said that they would
rather not have peace with North Korea, because it would
contribute to increased political popularity for President
Trump.

The North Korea Peace Process, more than any other issue,
shines light on the worst sufferers of Trump Derangement
Syndrome.

397
 Crooked Comey’s Latest Tweet Has
People Saying ‘He’s Running In 2020’
By Cristina Laila
June 16, 2018, 1:50 Pm

Fired FBI Director James Comey fired

off a tweet Saturday that had people
saying, ‘he’s running in 2020.’

Crooked cop Comey was skewered by the Inspector

General’s report which was released on Thursday.

The FBI was a total disaster of corruption and leaks under

Comey’s Directorship.

FBI agents under Comey’s watch were given improper

gifts by reporters in exchange for leaks.

James Comey even used a GMail account to conduct

official FBI business even though he lectured his agents
they would be in “huge trouble” for doing the same thing.

In a grotesque display of unabated hubris, Comey

continues to tweet out jokes and photos of himself.
Comey posted a picture of himself standing in a field in
Iowa with a caption that read,
“So good to see growth in Iowa and across
the country.”
The Iowa reference had people saying, ‘Comey’s running
in 2020.’
Presidential hopefuls visit Iowa because it’s the first state
ballots are cast.
Of course some of Comey’s sycophants cheered him on.

398
.

399
 Former CIA Director
Compares United States To Nazi Germany
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 3:43 Pm

Former CIA Director Michael Hayden

just compared the US to Nazis.

But it’s particularly disturbing when the

former head of the CIA says it.

Hayden is outraged that immigrants are

separated from their children when they
come into the country illegally.
So is MSNBC.

Joe Scarborough compared our law

enforcement of being Nazis on Friday.

400
Chairman Nunes Bombshell: “We Had Whistleblowers” In
The Fbi Tip Off Congress About Weiner Laptop In
September Of 2016 (Video)
By Cristina Laila
June 16, 2018, 4:36 Pm

VIDEO:

House Intel Chairman, Devin Nunes (R-CA) dropped a

bombshell on Fox News’ Ingraham Angle this week after
the IG report was released.

Nunes told Laura Ingraham that “whistleblowers” inside of

the FBI tipped off House Intel Committee members about
Anthony Weiner’s laptop in September of 2016.

“And I’ve actually never said this before

because we had whistleblowers but we
couldn’t really use the information before
that now that it is in the IG report we can.
We had whistleblowers that came to us in
late September of 2016 who talked to us
about this laptop sitting up in New York that
had additional emails on it,” Nunes said.
The House Intelligence Committee had that
but we couldn’t do anything with it,” Nunes
continued.
On Thursday, Inspector General Michael Horowitz
released his much-anticipated report on FBI and DOJ
actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
According to the Inspector General, FBI agents found
Huma Abedin deleting classified/Hillary Clinton emails
from her Yahoo account but failed to subpoena her
devices.
In late December, the State Department
released a portion of the documents
found on pervert Anthony Weiner’s
laptop and at least 5 emails contain
classified information.
The FBI seized Weiner’s laptop after he
was caught sexting with an underage
teenager and discovered CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION on the disgraced
politician’s computer.
It turns out Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin
forwarded sensitive State Department emails to all of her
insecure Yahoo email accounts which were later hacked by
foreign actors. Among the foreign agents that hacked
Huma’s Yahoo emails included RUSSIANS.

Huma forwarded State Department passwords and As previously reported, then-FBI Deputy
classified emails to this Yahoo account before it was Director Andrew McCabe knew about
hacked by foreign agents and the FBI did nothing. Let that Hillary’s emails on Weiner’s laptop as
sink in. early as September of 2016 and didn’t
alert the bureau for an entire MONTH.
401
The FBI waited over a month to obtain a warrant to review The same FBI agents who did nothing about Weiner’s
emails on Weiner’s laptop. laptop for over a month hunted down President Trump
with a vengeance. Truly disgusting.

402
 FLASHBACK: Three Years Ago Today –
Donald Announced His Historic Run For President —
WATCH HOW MEDIA MOCKED HIM
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 6:28 Pm

Thank you President Trump!

Thank you First Lady Melania Trump!

Thank you for Making America Great

Again!
And to think… The liberal America-
hating media mocked him!

This is an amazing flashback video….

Just think… It was three years ago

today that businessman Donald Trump
and his beautiful wife Melania
descended the Trump Tower escalator
to announce his candidacy for President
of the United States.

403
 Chinese Media Mocks President Trump:
“Only Fools Build Walls” …Wait, What?
By Jim Hoft
June 16, 2018, 11:07 Pm

The BBC reported:

Chinese media have mocked US President

Donald Trump over plans to impose 25%
tariffs on $50bn worth of Chinese goods,
saying “wise men build bridges but fools
build walls”.
Mr Trump announced the tariffs on Friday,
accusing Beijing of intellectual copyright
theft.

China retaliated, saying it would impose an additional 25%

The Great Wall of China, built in 476 BC, is the longest man-made tariff on 659 US goods worth $50bn.
structure in the world.
Stock markets fell after the announcements amid fear of a
Well, this was awkward. trade war.

The Chinese media this weekend The US had earlier warned that it will impose even more
mocked President Trump saying, “Only tariffs should China retaliate.
fools build walls.”

404
 Leaker-Liar James Clapper NOW
Claims A ‘Cut-Out’ Gave Hacked DNC Emails To Wikileaks
Posted On June 16, 2018
(National Sentinel) Clown Show: Former director of
national intelligence and serial leaker–liar James Clapper
had an interesting story to tell Yahoo News reporter
Michael Isikoff this week.
He claimed that around the time “the Russians” hacked the
Democratic National Committee’s emails and turned them
over to Wikileaks for publication, U.S. intelligence
thought they had identified a “third-party cut-out” who
was used as a go-between to deliver the emails to Julian
Assange.
Isikoff wrote:
U.S. intelligence officials last year identified
a “suspect” who served as the “cut-out” for
Russian intelligence to funnel thousands of
Democratic National Committee emails and
documents to WikiLeaks, according to
former Director of National Intelligence
James Clapper.
In an interview for the Yahoo News podcast
“Skullduggery,” Clapper told Chief
Investigative Correspondent Michael Isikoff
and Editor in Chief Daniel Klaidman that
intelligence officials were “pretty confident”
that they had identified the conduit for the
hacked emails to WikiLeaks by the time he
left office in January 2017. He declined,
however, to provide any details about the
suspect’s identity.
“We had a suspect,” said Clapper. “I don’t
know whether the suspicions we had at the
405
time were conveyed [to Justice Department
special counsel Robert Mueller] or whether
they were validated.” U.S. intelligence
officials were “pretty confident at the time
but not sufficient enough to publicize it,” he
said.
Is that so, Clapper?
So — the DNC emails were allegedly hacked two years
ago. Clown Show Clapper left his post in January 2017,
and this is the first we’re hearing of a “cut-out” who
worked for “Russian intelligence” to deliver the goods to
Wikileaks?
Sure. Only a dyed-in-the-wool Trump hater would believe
this…story.
Make no mistake, Clapper used the phrase “cut-out” so
that Assange could plausibly deny that the Russians gave
him the “hacked” documents.
Only, Assange has repeatedly stated he
knows how he came to possess the
documents and the Russians had
nothing to do with it.
Nothing.
In fact, we’re not even sure the emails and documents were
hacked. The DNC has never given the FBI’s cyber-
forensics team the servers so they can determine 1) if they
were hacked; and 2) by whom.
Others, including Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom,
have said murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the culprit.
For his part, Assange has said he has evidence that it
was not the Russians and he’ll provide it in exchange for a
pardon for alleged offenses. No one will take him up on it.
Plus, throughout WikiLeaks’ existence, the site has never
been proven wrong about anything. Neither has
Assange.
Clapper, on the other hand, has a history of lying — to
Congress, to reporters, and to the American people.

There’s more to prove these points, per Isikoff’s story:

In April, Russia used a third party ‘cut-out’

to send more than 19,000 DNC emails and
more than 8,000 documents to WikiLeaks
and Julian Assange, attempting to cover its
tracks and to give WikiLeaks some degree
of deniability in knowing the source of the
leaks.

Clapper then said:

“There is striking — I found, we found,

parallelism between what the [Trump]
campaign was doing and saying and what
the Russians were doing and saying. It was
almost like an echo chamber, particularly
with respect to Hillary Clinton personally, “Appears?”
and her alleged scandals and her alleged
maladies, physical and mental. There were “The published DNC emails go through to
a lot of very similar themes that came May 25–making “April” an impossibility.
ultimately from the Russians and the There are 44,053 emails, not 19,000. There
campaign.” are 17,761 documents, not 8,000. Clapper
gets literally everything wrong–but admits
he doesn’t know who our sources are,”
WikiLeaks said in another tweet.
Interesting choice of words, “echo chamber.” It was
Isikoff’s September 2016 story on Carter Page that was
used to “corroborate the Russia dossier to justify a spy
warrant, in one big echo chamber of lies,” The Gateway
Pundit reported.

Clapper has publicly stated that he found “no smoking gun

evidence” of Trump-Russia ‘collusion’ during the 2016
election cycle.

As for Isikoff’s figures stated above, WikiLeaks smacked

them — and Clapper — down.

“Clapper gets literally everything wrong–but

admits he doesn’t know who our sources
are. The published DNC emails go through
to May 25–making “April” an impossibility.
There are 44,053 emails, not 19,000. There
are 17,761 documents, not 8,000. Clapper
appears not to be credible,” the
whistleblower organization said in a tweet.
We’ve said it before: These Deep State hacks and the
Pravda media are the real threats to our national security
and domestic tranquility.
That’s because there is a sizeable portion of the country
that believes them when they say Russia and Trump “stole”
the election.

406
 All In The Family: Law Firm Hired
By Disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok Donated More Than
$24K To Hillary Clinton
By Jacob Wohl
June 17, 2018, 6:52 Am
In the run-up to the release of the Department of Justice’s
Office of Inspector General’s report on misconduct by the
FBI during the Clinton E-Mail Investigation, disgraced
former FBI Deputy Head of Counter-Intelligence Peter
Strzok hired Washington DC law firm Zuckerman Spaeder
LLP. Another Zuckerman Spaeder Attorney, William W.
Taylor, represents Trump-Russia Dossier creator Fusion
GPS, after being originally retained to assist with
subpoenas from the House Intelligence Committee.
Zuckerman Spaeder has donated more than more than
$30,000 to Democratic candidates for the 2018 election
cycle so far. The firm’s largest contribution was to anti-
Trump Democrat Senator Jon Tester. During the 2016
election cycle, the firm’s largest contribution, $24,383,
went to support none other than Hillary Clinton.
.
407
Zuckerman Spaeder LLP Political Contributions, courtesy
of OpenSecrets.org
The Zuckerman Spaeder attorney assigned to Peter
Strzok’s case, Aitan Goelman, was formerly the Director
for the Division of Enforcement of the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC), but left left the agency to
work for Zuckerman Spaeder LLP in January 2017.
Goelman has also been a contributor to the Huffington
Post.
Aitan Goelman has mounted an aggressive defense to the
apparent misconduct laid out in the OIG Report released
on Thursday. In a statement to Law and Crime Goelman
said
“Special Agent Strzok did not ‘back burner’
inspection of the Weiner laptop in the fall of
2016.” He continued, saying “Second, while
Special Agent Strzok openly admitted that
he believed that the Russia investigation
was far more important to American
national security than the Clinton email
investigation, this conclusion is evidence of
Special Agent Strzok’s lucidity, not his
bias.”
As of Friday, Peter Strzok is working in the human
resources department of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. When describing Strzok’s move to HR,
Asha Rangappa, a former FBI Special Agent and current
CNN analyst, told Business Insider that “I have seen
instances where if some issue comes up, the agent might
be moved to another investigation or to the operations
center, where you essentially field calls all day, but why he
would be moved to HR is just bizarre.”
In response to the report from the Inspector General, FBI
Director Chris Wray has vowed a renewed focus on
objectivity, but declined to comment specifically on the
fait of Peter Strzok and other unnamed FBI employees
featured in the report.
 Lou Dobbs Issues Warning: If Paul Ryan ‘Deceives’
Trump Into DACA Amnesty, GOP Will
Lose House Majority (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 17, 2018, 7:20 Am

Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs says if President

Trump is “deceived” by the Republican establishment and
House Speaker Paul Ryan into supporting an amnesty for
illegal aliens, it will “most certainly” cost the GOP their
majority in the House.

During a segment of Lou Dobbs Tonight, Dobbs blasted a

plan by Ryan and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) which
would grant amnesty to at least 1.8 million illegal aliens
who have been shielded from deportation by the President
Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
(DACA) program.

According to the White House, Trump now supports the

President Trump offered Democrats
DACA amnesty in exchange for a border
wall.
They wouldn’t take it.
So now Republican leaders want to give
DACA to the Democrats for free.
amnesty deal, though the president told reporters outside
the White House on Friday that he would not sign such a
bill.
Dobbs said Ryan and White House officials’ attempt to
“deceive” Trump into supporting the amnesty deal would
lead to a Democrat majority in the House for the upcoming
midterm elections.

It’s how they roll.

Republican leaders are going to reopen
immigration and amnesty talks this
week.
Voters be damned.
Lou Dobbs warned Tucker Carlson the
move will likely shuffle in a Democrat
majority.
They don’t care.

Breitbart.com reported:

408
 Rudy: FBI Agents Conspiring Against
Trump Should ‘Go To Bellevue’ Psych Ward
By Alicia Powe
June 17, 2018, 9:09 Am

mocking the anti-Trump bias of the

bureau’s leadership. “Ahhhhh we want
Hillary! What’s going to happen! I need a
psychiatrist!”
“Wackadoodles. Instead of investigating
President Trump, they should go to
Bellevue,” Giuliani added, referring to the
famous New York City psychiatric ward.
Giuliani praised the president for standing
steadfast in light of the intelligence
agencies’ effort to frame him.
“Distorted” FBI agents, who cried when Hillary Clinton “I’m very proud because he’s got that
lost the presidency, should be in a psychiatric ward instead spirit,” he said of Trump. “My God, nothing
of investigating President Donald Trump, warns the gets him down. But what they’ve been
president’s lawyer former New York Mayor Rudy doing to him is heartless, it’s cruel.”
Giuliani.

Speaking at a campaign rally Saturday in Staten Island for

GOP Rep. Dan Donovan, Giuliani argued the bureau’s
investigation into alleged collusion between Russia and the
Trump campaign during the election is a sham.

The investigation is “made up of a bunch of distorted

human beings who cried” when Hillary Clinton lost the
2016 election, Giuliani said.

The Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General

report of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use
of a private email server when she was Secretary of State
revealed FBI officials harshly criticizing Trump and his
supporters, and even cried when Clinton lost.

“Imagine FBI agents and prosecutors

crying when Hillary Clinton wasn’t elected. I
think if I could get those pictures of them
crying,” the former New York mayor said,
.

409
 ABC Panics As Congressional Leaders
Call For Mueller Probe To Be Wrapped Up
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 17, 2018 10:15 AM EDT
It appears as though, with the long-awaited release of the
Department of Justice Inspector General’s report
exposing anti-Trump bias by senior FBI investigators,
Republican Congressional leadership was finally ready to
call for an end to the Special Counsel’s investigation. After
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (CA) and Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (KY) spoke out, ABC’s
Good Morning America was fearful for the future of the
investigation on Sunday morning.
“There's news this morning in the
Russia investigation. New pressure on
the Special Counsel Robert Mueller with
two top Republicans calling for Mueller
to wrap it up,” announced co-anchor, Dan
Harris. His counterpart, Paula Faris was
worried about “Rudy Giuliani, President
Trump's personal attorney, who now
says Robert Mueller and his team
should be investigated.”
As ABC White House correspondent Tara Palmeri was
leading into the video portion of her report, she acted
confused as to why Giuliani would want
“the investigation suspended while
Mueller's team is investigated for
political bias.”
Of course, they neglected to mention how the lead FBI
investigator on the case, before it was handed over to
Mueller, reassured his mistress that they would “stop”
Trump from becoming president. ABC also failed to
mention that the IG report found an unidentified lawyer on
Mueller’s team had texted “viva le resistance” to a
colleague.
410
After Palmeri’s report, the co-anchors brought on chief
White House correspondent Jon Karl (who was hosting
ABC’s This Week) to ask him fearful questions about what
was in store the Russia probe now that Congressional
leaders have seen enough. Faris even scoffed at the idea of
investigating the investigators.
“And this is a significant change, Paula.
I mean, the Republican leadership in
Congress has been consistent in
supporting the Mueller investigation,”
Karl warned. “Now, the fact that they're
coming out saying it's got to be
wrapped up, and it’s got to be wrapped
up soon, and it's gone on too long. This
is a significant change that could erode
the political support for Mueller's
investigation.”
Harris was concerned that support from Congressional
Republicans to end the probe could give President Trump
the cover he needed to fire Mueller. “Well, it certainly
could,” Karl told him noting how those Republicans had
called for Trump to let Mueller do his job previously.
“But if the investigation goes on for a
significant time after these
Congressional leaders said it needed to
stop, it does give the President some --
it seems to me -- some leeway to do
something dramatic like that,” Karl
concluded on that topic.
ABC’s paranoia about the potential end of the Mueller
investigation comes after they tried to shield it from the
scathing IG report exposing the bias of some investigators.
The following morning, the network ignored the damning
anti-Trump text messages altogether. Instead of just
reporting the news, they appeared to have a vesting interest
in the continuation of the investigation.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below:
ABC
Good Morning America
June 17, 2018
8:09:10 AM Eastern [50 seconds]
DAN HARRIS: There's news this morning in the Russia
investigation. New pressure on the Special Counsel Robert
Mueller with two top Republicans calling for Mueller to wrap it up.
PAULA FARIS: And then there's Rudy Giuliani, President
Trump's personal attorney, who now says Robert Mueller and his
team should be investigated. ABC’s White House correspondent,
Tara Palmeri is at the White House for us with the very latest this
morning. Good morning Tara.
TARA PALMERI: Good morning, Dan and Paula. Giuliani told me
last night he wants the investigation suspended while Mueller's
team is investigated for political bias. Now, this would just drag
out the already year-long probe that President Trump's allies say
he wants wrapped up.
[Cuts to video]
President Trump and his allies calling on special counsel Robert
Mueller to wrap up the Russia investigation.
KEVIN MCCARTHY: I think the Mueller investigation has got to
stop.
MITCH MCCONNELL: They ought to wrap it up. It's gone on
seemingly forever.
(…)
8:10:21 AM Eastern [26 seconds]
PALMERI: At the same time, Giuliani potentially dragging the
case out even longer. Calling for the probe to be suspended.
.
411
RUDY GIULIANI: Mueller only gets an interview after he gets
thoroughly investigated and we determine his conflicts, biases,
and prejudices with his staff.
PALMERI: Giuliani says he won't even negotiate the terms of a
potential sit-down with the President until he sees a record on
Mueller’s team. Adding, if the President does agree to cooperate,
Giuliani doesn't want him sitting face to face with Mueller.
(…)
8:11:55 AM Eastern [1 minute 20 seconds]
FARIS: So let's talk about the Russia investigation. Rudy Giuliani
now calling for an investigation into the investigation. It's one
thing when he speaks but now we have prominent lawmakers
like McCarthy and Mitch McConnell talking about the Mueller
investigation, that we need to wrap it up, so does it make a real
difference?
JON KARL: It does. And this is a significant change, Paula. I
mean, the Republican leadership in Congress has been
consistent in supporting the Mueller investigation. So, even as
the President's called it a witch hunt, even as some of those –
some of his allies in his base have vilified Mueller. The
Congressional leadership, people like McCarthy and Paul Ryan,
and Mitch McConnell, have said that Mueller must be allowed to
do his work. Now, the fact that they're coming out saying it's got
to be wrapped up, and it’s got to be wrapped up soon, and it's
gone on too long. This is a significant change that could erode
the political support for Mueller's investigation. And ultimately, the
political support matters here.
HARRIS: So would this make it easier for the President to fire
him?
JON KARL: Well, it certainly could. They’ve still held the line
saying that firing Mueller would be a mistake. But if the
investigation goes on for a significant time after these
Congressional leaders said it needed to stop, it does give the
President some -- it seems to me -- some leeway to do
something dramatic like that.
(…)
 Rep. Nunes: If DOJ Does Not Turn Over Documents By
Monday – They Will Have ‘Hell To Pay’ By Wednesday
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 17, 2018, 10:18 Am

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) the Chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday
Morning Futures on Father’s Day.
be hell to pay by Wednesday morning… All
of the members of the House of
Representatives are going to start taking
action against the Department of Justice
and FBI.
Maria Bartiromo: Taking action meaning
contempt of Congress?
Rep. Devin Nunes: Well that’s just one of
many options but I can tell you that it’s not
going to be pretty.

Via Sunday Morning Futures:

Rep. Nunes told Maria the Department of Justice

leadership has until Monday to turn over the subpoenaed
documents or they will have “hell to pay.”

Rep. Devin Nunes: The deadline is this

week. So if documents begin to be turned
over tomorrow and a clear way and path
forward for everything else is not clear here
in the next couple of days there’s going to
.

412
 LIST Of The Many Criminal Acts Of Dirty-Cop Peter
Strzok: Obama’s Top FBI Investigator And Mueller’s
Former Lead Investigator
By Jim Hoft
June 17, 2018, 12:15 Pm
Peter Strzok will go down in history as
the most corrupt and criminal dirty cop
in US history. The Strzok name will be
synonymous with sleazy, self-absorbed,
grandiose, sinister, corrupt and criminal
bad cops. He’s become the most
disgusting individual in the Deep State
and shockingly he still has a job at the
corrupt FBI.
The US Justice Department is a mess
and perhaps no one, besides Barack
Obama, has been involved in more
corruption in our country’s history than
Peter Strzok.
Strzok worked in the FBI as an inspector and rocketed to
the top of the department in a relatively short period of
time. Some reports believe that Strzok’s family’s ties with
Obama and his family’s history overseas and with uranium
may be the reason for Stzok’s meteoric rise at the FBI.
Reports are that Strzok first hit the spotlight in August and
September of 2015 when he requested all Hillary Clinton
email copies under control of the DOE, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, NSA, and National
counterterrorism center, Director of National Intelligence,
DOJ, NSA, and US Treasury.
413
Strzok’s apparently had an affair in 2015 and 2016 with
his mistress, top FBI Attorney Lisa Page. Text messages
between the two were very damning and show a culture of
corruption and criminality. They were first reportedly
uncovered by the DOJ IG who communicated his findings
to Special Counsel Mueller who was the Head of the
corrupt Trump – Russia scam at the time. Somehow
Mueller felt the need to have the most corrupt, conflicted
and criminal individuals he could find when creating his
team and Strzok and Page were in that list.
What we now know from the Strzok and Page texts are
that the FBI implanted numerous spies in the Trump
campaign as early as 2015. We also know that former
President Obama was in on the entire corrupt scandal
based on the text between the two conflicted individuals
“Potus [Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing”
and another text that said that the Obama White House is
running this.
Through the Strzok and Page texts, we now know that they
not only hated candidate and now President Trump and his
millions of followers, but they also wanted to prevent him
from being President and then wanted to do all they could
to have him removed from office. They texted each other
–
“We’ll stop Trump from becoming
President”.
Through the IG’s reports we know that Peter Strzok did all
he could to prevent any charges of Hillary Clinton during
her email investigation that ended in 2016 as he was the
lead investigator. He was fine with her server being
scrubbed, her phones being beat to bits by hammers and
her arguments on the emails in her position that were
classified and illegally held outside of government
protection.
Strzok was involved in doctoring the report on Hillary’s
exoneration presented by now fired corrupt FBI Director
James Comey which was changed to state that Hillary
broke no crimes. The report was written months before the
case was closed and Hillary and her team were
interviewed.
 FBI agents to interview General Mike Flynn who was
reportedly set up. There is now evidence that Flynn did
not lie to the FBI even though this was communicated to
President Trump who fired Flynn and to corrupt Mueller
who indicted him for lying to the FBI.

Strzok is so corrupt his wife even has a storied past. She

works for the SEC and was promoted in October 2016
shortly after the completion of the Hillary email scandal
and at the same time her husband was building the Russia
– Trump farce on behalf of Deep State. Her Facebook
account was full of Obama endorsements but reportedly
they were recently were scrubbed free.

The description of Clinton’s handling of classified

information was changed from “grossly negligent” to
“extremely careless;”

Strzok reportedly interviewed Hillary and did not put her

under oath and praised Hillary while he was leading her
investigation.

When the Hillary investigation was reopened in late
October 2016 due to some of her emails being found in a
pervert’s computer in New York, Peter Strzok was
assigned again to the case. He worked and somehow
performed miracles on “1,355,980 electronic files (pg
389), containing 350,000 emails and 344,000 Blackberry
communications [that] were reviewed between October
30th and the morning of November 6th, 2016.”
Strzok and Page were removed from the Mueller team with
the explanation being that they had biased text messages.
They weren’t just biased, they were attempting to
overthrow our government through letting Hillary off with
no charges for mishandling classified information and then
damaging President Trump through numerous activities to
prevent him from being President and then from
performing his duties as President.

The Conservative Treehouse notes that – Page resigned from the FBI but
Strzok is still there!
 There were only three people in the Mid-Year-Event
team granted authority to physically do the Clinton
email review.
 They were: FBI Agent Peter Strzok, FBI Attorney-1
Tashina “Tash” Gauhar, and an unnamed lead
analyst.
 FBI Agent Peter Strzok says they were able to cull the
number of emails through the use of “some amazing
things to rapidly de-duplicate” the emails.
 The New York FBI case agent assigned to the Weiner
investigation, a certified Digital Extraction Technician,
as well as the FBI forensics team in Quantico say it
was impossible to use the conflicted metadata to “de- Let’s hope and pray the US never has an
duplicate” the emails. individual as corrupt and criminal Peter
 Someone is lying. Strzok in any capacity in our
government and that he and his
After that escapade Strzok began working for the totally accomplices are brought to justice
corrupt Mueller team. But before that he was one of two soon. God bless the USA.
414
 MORE DEEP STATE SPYING=> Roger Stone And
Michael Caputo Were Targets Of FBI Informant
By Jim Hoft
June 17, 2018, 1:34 Pm

Longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone and Trump

campaign aide Michael Caputo claim to have been targeted
in a setup by U.S. law enforcement during the 2016
campaign to pin then-candidate Donald Trump.

In a Washington Post report Sunday, Stone claims that he

The Deep State Spying Scandal on the
Trump Campaign will go down as the
largest political scandal in US history.
As Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit reported in May —
At Least 6 and Potentially 7 Known and Suspected
Intelligence Informants Accused of Spying on Trump
Campaign
met with a man in May 2016 who offered dirt on Trump’s
2016 rival, Hillary Clinton. However, the man, who
identified himself as Henry Greenberg, said he wanted
Trump to pay $2 million for the damaging information and
therefore was shut down, according to Stone.
Stone recalled telling the man that he didn’t understand
Trump, a wealthy New York real estate businessman. “He
doesn’t pay for anything,” Stone claims to have said to the
man at a restaurant in Florida.
Afterwards, the report shows a screenshot of a text
exchange between Stone and Caputo, who set up the
meeting after Greenberg reached out to a Russian
immigrant business partner of Caputo’s.

“How crazy is the Russian?” Caputo asked.

Stone replied the meeting was a “waste of time” because

the man wanted “big” money for information.

And now there are more.

Trump associates Roger Stone and Michael Caputo were

approached by another FBI informant during their
campaign in the Deep State’s quest to tie Donald Trump to
Putin’s Russia.

And — once again — neither of them

took the bait.

The Washington Examiner reported:

415
 NBC Panel Debates How Often
Media Should Call President Trump A Liar
By Nicholas Fondacaro
June 17, 2018 1:39 PM EDT
President Obama constantly told falsehoods to the
American people about how his policies worked, how they
would be implemented, and what the benefits were. His
most famous one, “if you like your health care plan, you
can keep it” got him the Lie of the Year. But when
President Trump does his own spinning, it all of a sudden
becomes a moral conundrum for the liberal media. The
stacked anti-Trump panel on NBC’s Meet the Press proved
this point on Sunday when they debated when to call him a
liar.
Moderator Chuck Todd actually set aside time in the
program so he and his stacked panel could go over recent
statements by the President and rake him over the coals.
“You have to be a sort of taxonomist of
falsehoods. I mean, traditionally, the
President’s stock and trade has been to
traffic in a substance that's identical to
my initials,” declared New York Times
columnist and faux conservative Bret
Stephens.
Having found great amusement in the low-brow joke,
Todd reminded viewers that Stephens’ initials were B.S.
The columnist then appeared to push the CNN-backed
conspiracy theory that something was wrong with the
President’s head.
“And there's always a question also
about the President's state of mind
because he says stuff and then often
doesn't seem to remember what he had
said the day, the hour, the minute
before,” he suggested.
416
Todd thought it was a “fair point” and “funny” that
Stephens would question the President’s “mental
capacity” even though neither had training in the field. He
then promoted the ramblings of “conservative” columnist
Andrew Sullivan you “went there”:
This is what he wrote, Helen:
“If someone behaved like this in my actual
life, if someone kept insisting that the sea
was red and the sky was green, I’d assume
they were a few sandwiches short of a
picnic. It's vital to remember this every day:
Almost no one else in public life is no
openly living in his own disturbed world.”
“What do you want me to do,” laughed
New York Times Pentagon correspondent
Helene Cooper as she went on the explain
The Times’ policy on using the word “lie.”
“And we have said lied in the past but
what Dean Baquet, the executive editor
of The Times, has said is that he thinks
we shouldn't use it all the time because
if you use it all the tie it loses the
meaning.”
According to Cooper, she couldn’t remember ever
“wrestling” with whether or not to use the term.
“[I]t's something, I’m not used to having
to deal with as a reporter when you’re
talking about the president,” she
lamented. Todd sympathized with her and
 described the Trump-era as
“disorientating.”
“This is a different level. And I think
what we struggle with as reporters, is
what do you label a lie? Because a lie
has to be deliberate,” said NBC national
reporter Carol Lee. “So President with
Trump, you know, in order to call it a lie,
you have to be able to show that he is
deliberately and intentionally doing that.
A lot of times when he's ill-informed,
he’s misinformed and you don't know
what his intent is.”
Republican strategist and former head of the American
Conservative Union, Al Cardenas claimed there were only
two reasons for why the President would twist the truth,
one of them being that he had a mental problem.
Todd also though Cardenas made some great points and
huffed about how Obama was “punished” by receiving the
Lie of the Year label by PolitiFact.
“He didn't serially do it [like Trump]. So
here he is punished for one, in a way
uniquely.” But claiming Obama was
“uniquely” slapped with Lie of the Year
was in itself a falsehood because Trump
also got that label in 2017.
The transcript is below:
NBC
Meet the Press
June 17, 2018
10:58:17 AM Eastern [4 minutes 20 seconds]
(…)
BRET STEPHENS: You have to be a sort of taxonomist of
falsehoods. I mean, traditionally, the President’s stock and trade
has been to traffic in a substance that's identical to my initials.
And that this is a world
CHUCK TODD: Your name again is Bret Stephens.
STEPHENS: Right.
TODD: Okay, I just wanted to clarify.
STEPHENS: I mean, this is a world sort of -- the gray world
between clear truths and unmistakable lies. And there's always a
question also about the President's state of mind because he
says stuff and then often doesn't seem to remember what he had
said the day, the hour, the minute before. I still think that you
have to hold the President clearly accountable when he is
417
contradicting information that he has previously pervaded. And
that is what we call a lie, not a falsehood.
TODD: Fair point. It's funny you say this about his mental
capacity. Andrew Sullivan went there. This is what he wrote,
Helene: “If someone behaved like this in my actual life, if
someone kept insisting that the sea was red and the sky was
green, I’d assume they were a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
It's vital to remember this every day: Almost no one else in public
life is no openly living in his own disturbed world.”
HELENE COOPER: What do you want me to do? [Laughter]
That's like -- it's something that at The Times we’ve been
wrestling with on the news side because we get a lot of letters
from readers saying, “why don't you say the President made
misstatements—“
TODD: Getting a lot of tweets right now.
COOPER: -- why don’t you just call a lie a lie?” And we have said
lied in the past but what Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The
Times has said is that, he thinks we shouldn't use it all the time
because if you use it all the tie it loses the meaning. This is
something that not-- I can't remember as a reporter wrestling with
-- if you keep saying and he's right to a certain extent if you keep
saying lie, lie, lie, it does lose the impact when there’s a real
whopper. But it's something, I’m not used to having to deal with
as a reporter when you’re talking about the president.
TODD: It’s disorientating.
CAROL LEE: That's the thing. All politicians tell lies. We have
experienced this in covering politicians.
TODD: But there used to be honor among thieves.
LEE: This is a different level. And I think what we struggle with as
reporters, is what do you label a lie? Because a lie has to be
deliberate. So President with Trump, you know, in order to call it
a lie, you have to be able to show that he is deliberately and
intentionally doing that. A lot of times when he's ill-informed, he’s
misinformed and you don't know what his intent is. And so, that
adds a whole other dimension that’s we’re not used to. But his
false statements -- there's nothing to compare it with. The
number of times.
AL CARDENAS: After watching what you just played out here,
you only reach one of two conclusions. Does he have, you know,
mental capability issues or he is chronically doing this and if he's
doing it chronically is it purposeful? Or, you know, just a matter of
habit or addiction?
[Crosstalk]
TODD: It does feel like he's selling a timeshare all the time.
CARDENAS: Here's the point. The point politically is that it’s less TODD: The numbness.
damaging for him to lie 18 times in one morning than once.
Because that feature that helps him the most is the numbness STEPHENS: The lies sort of disappear in their own ubiquity. But
because of the frequency and volume of these things. The it's important –
numbness with the electorate. They have so much to absorb and
so little time to do it that they go home half of the time confused
TODD: That’s right out of the Putin playbook, by the way.
rather than convinced that something is amiss here.
STEPHENS: Right, it's important for us in the media, I think, to
TODD: What a great point. You know, Barack Obama got the
pick our spots. I remember Senator McCain at one point said, “I
quote lie of the year, if you like your health care plan, you get to
can't be the car alarm that's always going off.” And I think we also
keep it. I think that was back in 2012 or 2013 or whenever it was.
have to be careful about -- for our own credibility about being
But you're right. He didn't serially do it. So here he is punished for
very scrupulous of separating what are clear lies or seem to be
one, in a way uniquely. Bret.
clear lies from misstatements, falsehoods. Otherwise, it gives him
the opening to call us the fake news media which is what he
STEPHENS: Sure. wants.

418
 Rudy Giuliani Calls For Mueller Witch Hunt To Be
Investigated (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 17, 2018, 2:15 Pm

administration has been investigated,”

Giuliani said.

The Inspector General report revealed a very damning text

message from Mueller’s lead attorney, Peter Strzok.

The Trump-hating FBI agent sent his

mistress Lisa Page a text message
saying “we’ll stop” Trump from
becoming President.

On Sunday, an attorney for Trump, Rudy This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days
Giuliani called for the Mueller witch hunt
before the “insurance policy” text.
to be investigated.
Mueller and his team of hacks should be shut down and
On Sunday it was revealed in the Washington Post, Trump investigated immediately.
associates Roger Stone and Michael Caputo were
approached by another FBI informant during their
VIDEO:
campaign in the Deep State’s quest to tie Donald Trump to
Putin’s Russia.

And — once again — neither of them took the bait.

The Fake News media is using this story to continue to

push the Trump-Russia hoax in an attempt to drag the
‘Russian collusion’ narrative into the 2018 mid-term
elections.

Rudy Giuliani spoke to Jake Tapper in an appearance on

CNN’s State of the Union Sunday and called for the
Mueller witch hunt to be investigated.
On Sunday, President Trump once again ripped the
“I believe that the Mueller investigation Russian collusion witch hunt from his Twitter account.
should be investigated, not necessarily
because of Mueller, but because of its
genesis in this very very, now almost illegal
probe–this Russia probe that began with
Peter Strzok in charge. He didn’t leave until
July of last year,” Giuliani told Tapper.

Giuliani clarified he wants an investigation into what led

up to the Special Counsel.

“We want the Mueller probe to be

investigated the way the Trump

419
 Gowdy: FBI, DOJ Must Comply With GOP Subpoena Or
Face ‘Full Arsenal Of Constitutional Weapons’ (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 17, 2018, 3:53 Pm

And Paul made it very clear; there’s going to be action on

the floor of the House this week if the FBI and DOJ do not
comply with our subpoena request,” he continued.

“So [Deputy Attorney General] Rod

Rosenstein, [FBI Director] Chris Wray you
were in the meeting, you understood him
just as clearly as I did. We’re going to get
compliance or the House of
Representatives is going to use its full
arsenal of constitutional weapons to gain
If the FBI and DOJ fails to comply with the House compliance.”
Republicans’ subpoena request, after months of
stonewalling and impeding the Congressional
investigators, there will be daunting repercussions, House
Oversight Committee Chairman Gowdy, R-S.C., warned
Sunday.

Republicans have charged the DOJ and FBI are

deliberately impeding their investigation into the the
bureau’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe and
the surveillance of the Trump campaign during the 2016
presidential election by refusing to avail more than a
million documents the House Judiciary Committee has
requested pertaining to probes.
“I don’t want the drama; I want the
The FBI and DOJ has justified the stonewalling and refusal documents,” Gowdy added.
to comply with the House GOP’s request, claiming the
sensitive documents requires careful review before they
are disseminated. Gowdy also expressed disdain with FBI leadership in light
of the damning DOJ IG report released Thursday,
confirming FBI officials vowed to “stop” the Trump
House Speaker Paul Ryan led a meeting Friday night with campaign and presidency.
senior members of the DOJ and FBI, cautioining the
Justice Department will face “the full panoply of
constitutional weapons available to the people’s house,” “I don’t know what [Special Counsel
including contempt of Congress. Robert] Mueller has,” he said. “I do know
this: that bias is so pervasive and everyone
who has ever stood in front of a jury and
“Under the heading of minor miracles, you had to explain it in a way will tell you it is
had members of the House working on a the most miserable feeling in the world and
Friday night,”Gowdy said. “Paul Ryan led I’ve never seen this level of bias.”
this meeting. You had [House Intelligence
Committee Chair] Devin Nunes, [House
Judiciary Committee Chair] Bob Goodlatte, The IG report also delegitimized the FBI’s surveillance of
myself and everyone you can think of from the Trump campaign and the bureau’s accusations of
the FBI and the DOJ, and we went item by Trump, Russian collusion, Gowdy argued.
item on both of those outstanding
subpoenas.
420
 “The only person in the universe who
claims to have evidence of collusion is
Adam Schiff and unlike any other secret
he’s ever had, he’s never told anyone what
evidence he has – there is no evidence of
collusion,” he said. “Obstruction of justice?
Good luck having your star witness being
Jim Comey in any prosecution from shop
lifting to obstruction of justice – good luck if
that’s your star witness.
The IG does not exonerate Trump from the Russia probe,
but “it certainly helps him,” Gowdy said.
421
“The same people, the same players that
were involved in the Clinton probe, later
moved to the Russia probe. John Brennan,
who said [Trump] ‘should be in the dust bin
of history.’” “Comey, who said
‘impeachment was too good of a remedy.’
Lorretta Lynch, who wanted Hillary Clinton
to win. And then we’ve got Peter Strzok
and Lisa Page — they presumed and
pronounced Donald Trump’s guilt before
the investigation even began.”
DISGRACE: Former CIA Director Michael Hayden Likens
The U.S. To Nazis, But WE Are Correcting The Record
Posted On June 17, 2018

(National Sentinel) Outrage: Those on the Left have never Now, former CIA Director Michael Hayden — who ought
been known for their tolerance of opposing viewpoints, but to know a nation without border security really isn’t a
in the age of Trump they have become nation — has made the same Nazi comparison, tweeting
completely unhinged. out a picture of a concentration camp at Birkenau which
was then a part of Nazi Germany, but is now Poland.
The latest outrage on the Left pertains to the Trump
administration’s continuation of an Obama-era policy that
separates children from criminal adults who attempt to
sneak into the U.S. illegally.

Last week an unruly CNN reporter, Brian Karem,

screamed at White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee
Sanders over the policy in a disgusting display of
partisanship that, frankly, should have resulted in the
Secret Service perp-walking him out of the White House
and revoking his press pass.

Just disgraceful. This man used to run the CIA and the
NSA. Suddenly, border security doesn’t matter to him, and
our border enforcement personnel are nothing but ‘jack-
booted thugs,’ apparently.

Then, on his little-watch MSNBC program, former

“Republican” congressman Joe Scarborough compared
U.S. border enforcement personnel to the Nazis.
422

Obviously the deranged Left — always looking for an
issue that divides Americans rather than unites them — has
seized upon this ‘child separation’ policy as its latest anti-
Trump wedge issue. That’s surprisingly tone-deaf, given
that much of Trump’s victory hinged on his pledge to
improve border security and build a wall.
That said, Trump has not issued some new directive.
This is merely a continuation of border
policy from the previous president.
He could change it with an executive order, true, but they
he loses the only leverage he has in his ongoing effort to
curb serial abuses of our immigration laws — which
are not adequate and which the current Republican
leadership in Congress refuses to address.
But there’s another aspect of this that isn’t
being reported — the perception of ‘kids
in cages’ being perpetrated by the
Left is a gross misrepresentation, and of
course, that’s purposeful.
Interestingly, Left-leaning NPR sent a reporter to a Texas
facility in an effort to get details on conditions where
children separated from criminal border crossers are being
‘caged.’
Turns out they aren’t in cages at all, but well-maintained
facilities where they are very well cared for:
423
This is the largest government-contracted
migrant youth shelter in the country: Casa
Padre, a former Walmart supercenter
converted into living, recreational and
dining quarters for nearly 1,500 immigrant
boys.
Shelter managers took reporters on a tour
of the facility in Brownsville, Texas, on
Wednesday, amid criticism over the Trump
administration’s “zero tolerance” policy that
has led to separating migrant families who
crossed the border illegally.
“We want to show you that these are not
kids kept in cages,” said Alexia Rodriguez,
a spokeswoman for the Texas nonprofit
Southwest Key that operates the shelter.
“We provide them excellent care.”
On Wednesday, reporters were allowed a
rare glimpse inside Casa Padre, a 250,000-
square-foot facility located on the outskirts
of Brownsville across from a pizza joint and
a McDonald’s. The boys confined there
waved, smiled and said “hola” to the group
of visiting journalists…
Kids were seen shooting baskets, kicking soccer balls,
“playing video games, watching a movie,
sitting in classrooms where they were
taught about the U.S. government, learning
tai chi and chowing down on a meal of
chicken and mixed vegetables.”
The report noted that the kids were kept inside most of the
day, but it’s Texas. It’s hot this time of year.
NPR called it a “carefully-scripted visit,” a journalistic
twist-of-phrase meant to give the reader the impression
that what the reporter saw was out of the ordinary. That’s
absurd; there is no evidence presented to indicate that.
NPR is liberal so we get it. The larger point is this:
These kids are not being corralled into
cages 23 out of 24 hours a day. They are
being cared for. Fed. Housed. Educated.
To portray the situation as anything other than that is
dishonest and disgusting.
Activist CNN Analyst Doubles Down, Refuses To Apologize
For Tantrum During Tuesday’s White House Briefing
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 17, 2018, 4:56 Pm
Playboy White House reporter and CNN political analyst
Brian Karem has been using the briefing room as a
grounds for activism, and is completely unapologetic for
his outbursts.
On Tuesday, Karem had a meltdown at Press Secretary
Sarah Sanders over separating illegal immigrant families at
the border and inappropriately brought her children up to
make his point.
424
“Don’t you have any empathy? Come on,
Sarah. You’re a parent. Don’t you have any
empathy for what these people are going
through?” Karem shouted at Sanders as
she urged him to settle down.
On Sunday, Karem appeared on CNN’s Reliable Sources
to defend his activism and transparent attempt to become
the headline.
“I have an apology to make,” he started. “I
apologize to every who has had to
suffer…who has less than I do, and I did
not come to the table sooner. I’m sorry to
those people for waiting so long, holding
my temper.”
The cringe inducing virtue signalling continued throughout
his appearance.
“I’m sorry that I am extremely angry
with this administration that has lied to
me, continues to lie to me. I’m sorry as a
reporter that for so long I thought that
the idea was to — I was struggling so
hard to do my job I forgot that my job is
to comfort the afflicted, afflict the
comfortable, and ask questions for
those who have no voice.”
Shockingly, CNN host Brian Stelter actually brought up
the fact that many are accusing Karem of attempting to
make it about himself.
 First Lady Melania Trump Weighs In On Border
Separation Controversy
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 17, 2018, 5:46 Pm
First Lady Melania Trump tends to shy away from political
discourse, but has now weighed in on the emotionally
charged debate about border separations.
Stephanie Grisham, the communications director for the
First Lady, told CNN on Sunday that Mrs. Trump hopes
there can be a bipartisan effort for immigration reform.
.
425
“Mrs. Trump hates to see children
separated from their families and hopes
both sides of the aisle can finally come
together to achieve successful immigration
reform,” Grisham said.
“She believes we need to be a country
that follows all laws, but also a country
that governs with heart.”
There has been a heated debate about the policy that
separates children from their parents who are detained.
Supporters of the policy note that American children
whose parents are jailed do not join them behind bars.
There is also concerns from many that children who do not
have proper documentation could be victims of human
trafficking.
Critics of the policy believe that it is inhumane to separate
the families, even if the parents are detained. They argue
that children who are old enough are asked if the person
that they are with is a parent or relative.
There are approximately 2,000 children who have been
separated from their parents at the border.
 Johnson: Trump Admin Are 'Terrorists,'
Comey 'Pissed' At 'Black Woman Boss'
By Brad Wilmouth
June 17, 2018 5:51 PM EDT
Appearing as a guest on Sunday's AM Joy, race-obsessed
MSNBC contributor Jason Johnson accused former FBI
director James Comey of resenting Attorney General
Loretta Lynch for being a "black woman boss," and then
went on to accuse Trump administration members of being
"terrorists" who "terrorize people into leaving the country"
to promote "white nationalism."
At 11:22 a.m. Eastern, during a discussion of Comey's
decisions to hold the July 2016 news conference on the
Hillary Clinton email investigation, and to release a letter
in October 2016 updating Congress on the investigation,
Johnson was true to form in working a fantasy of racism
into the discussion:
James Comey didn't want to listen to Loretta Lynch.
He didn't want to listen to a black
woman who was his boss.
Let's just be honest about it. He came and spoke at
Howard (University) about this: 'Oh, it wasn't political.'
No, you were pissed that your black woman boss told you
to be quiet -- he didn't want to do it -- and he went out and
he swung an election.
.
426
In a later segment, during a discussion of the issue of
children being separated from their parents who have
entered the U.S. illegally, host Joy Reid lamented that
"these children will remain hostages" until funding for a
border wall is provided, leading Johnson to make
hyperbolic charges of President Donald Trump making the
government into a "terrorist organization." Johnson:
You cannot accomplish white
nationalism without basically turning
the government into a terrorist
organization –
without terrorizing people and forcing them to leave --
without encouraging violence either from state-sponsored
actors or not investigating white nationalists. You have to
literally terrorize people into leaving this country.
He soon alluded to the film, Taken, with Liam Nissan, as
he called Trump administration members "terrorists."
Johnson:
This whole administration -- it's like a Liam
Nissan Taken movie. These guys are
terrorists, right? They are constantly taking
hostages -- whether it's CHIP, whether it's
DACA, whether it's the asylum -- they have
no problem taking kids and putting guns to
their heads and demanding that the rest of
the country do what they want them to do.
Until we recognize that we are operating with a white
nationalist government that will take children hostage to
get what they want, even if ti's just a tax cut, the
Democrats and anyone else resisting doesn't really know
what they're fighting.
 Kathy Griffin To First Lady Melania Trump:
“F**K You, Melanie… You Feckless Piece Of Sh*T”
By Cassandra Fairbanks
June 17, 2018, 7:06 Pm

Following Melania Trump weighing in on the emotionally

charged debate about border separations, trashy washed up
comedian Kathy Griffin lost her mind on Twitter, calling
the First Lady a “feckless complicit piece of s–t.”

Stephanie Grisham, the communications director for the

First Lady, told CNN on Sunday that Mrs. Trump hopes
there can be a bipartisan effort for immigration reform.
“Mrs. Trump hates to see children
separated from their families and hopes
both sides of the aisle can finally come
together to achieve successful
immigration reform,” Grisham said.
“She believes we need to be a country
that follows all laws, but also a country
that governs with heart.”
Griffin has been desperately attempting relevancy ever
since her stunt holding a prop meant to look like the
decapitated head of President Donald Trump made her lose
gigs left and right.
Critics of the policy believe that it is inhumane to separate
the families, even if the parents are detained. They also
point to children who are old enough being asked if the
person that they are with is a parent or relative.

Griffin, naturally, responded to the classy stat “F-ck you
Melanie, You know damn well your husband can end this
immediately… you feckless complicit piece of sh-t,”
Griffin tweeted, using the wrong name.
Supporters of the policy note that American children
whose parents are jailed do not join them behind bars.
There is also concerns from many that children who do not
have proper documentation could be victims of human
trafficking.

427
 Tom Arnold Rants That 'Trump
Is A Russian Asset'; Gives No Evidence
By P.J. Gladnick
June 17, 2018 7:12 PM EDT

"Don't worry. Tom Arnold is on it and I'm ARNOLD: Well, he won't let us investigate.
Tom Arnold." He won't let us follow through. They
meddled in our election.
That was Tom Arnold promoting his upcoming television KNOWLES: How did they meddle in the
show, The Hunt for the Trump Tapes With Tom Arnold. election? They spent $100,000 on
However the only thing Arnold seemed to be on during his Facebook ads from one digital company.
Wednesday interview on the Daily Wire's Michael
Knowles Show podcast was a variety of stimulants judging ARNOLD: Do you not listen to our own
from his unhinged rants about President Trump being a intelligence?
"Russian asset" backed up by nothing since he was unable KNOWLES: What intelligence are you
to provide any evidence for his wild claim. referring to? Because I'm citing the
$100,000 in Facebook ads.
ARNOLD: You are privy to it because it's
the NSA, the CIA, and the FBI. They've
shared all that with...
KNOWLES: How did they meddle,
specifically?

Ah, those annoying questions again that keep confusing

poor Tom.

ARNOLD: I'm not privy to it either.

Wait, Tom Arnold just told Knowles that he is privy to it

TOM ARNOLD: I don't trust him
because of the NSA, CIA, and FBI but somehow poor
negotiating anything for us! I think that
Tom himself is not privy to it. The stimulants effect?
Donald Trump is a Russian asset. I don't
think he knows it.
Finally a "Not the president" chant by Tom Arnold as the
MICHAEL KNOWLES: What's you chemical reactions from a variety of stimulants seem to be
evidence? kicking in.
ARNOLD: I don't think he knows it.
KNOWLES: What's your evidence? ARNOLD: HE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT!
HE DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE
PRESIDENT! HE IS NOT THE
"What's your evidence?" It's the question that completely
PRESIDENT! HE'S AN ILLEGITIMATE
throws a confused Arnold completely off his game as you
PRESIDENT! EVERYTHING HE
can see.
ACCUSED BARACK OBAMA OF,
THAT'S HIM! HE IS NOT THE
ARNOLD: He's in love with Putin. Putin PRESIDENT!
does have something on him.
KNOWLES: What is your evidence of Yup, Tom Arnold is on it. Just check the prescription list.
that?

Ah! That annoying question again that Tom Arnold is

completely unable to answer.

.
428
Obama Administration Placed Children With Human
Traffickers, Democrats Were Silent
By Alicia Powe
June 17, 2018, 10:45 Pm

Democrats used Father’s Day to

repudiate the Trump administration’s
“zero tolerance” policy toward illegal
immigrants.
The anti-Trump lawmakers took to
social media to pile on President Trump,
declaring Sunday a
“#FathersDayofAction.”

Our kids, Ted?

So these are “our kids” now?
Ironically, Democrat leadership was
complacent during the Obama
presidency when kids who were caught
crossing the border were subjected to
volatile detention and horrendous
trafficking.

429
 A Senate investigation report, which
was ignored by the mainstream media,
revealed the Obama administration
neglected to protect thousand of Central
American children who surged across
the U.S. border since 2011, subjecting
them to traffickers and abuses.
After authorities in July discovered several Guatemalan
eight teen boys were being held captive a decrepit trailer in
Marion, Ohio, by traffickers, Sen. Rob Portman, R -Ohio,
to initiated an investigation into welfare of
unaccompanied, undocumented minors.
The boys were forced to work at an egg farm are among
125,000 unaccompanied minors who have flooded into the
United States since 2011 to escape socialistic unrest in
South America.

Another Guatemalan was placed with a sponsor who

forced him to work at least 12 hours a day to pay off a
$6,500 smuggling debt, which the sponsor later increased
to $10,900, according to the report.

A boy from El Salvador was permitted to live with his

abusive father, despite explaining caseworker that had
regularly hitting him with an electrical cord. When the boy
alerted authorities in September that his father forced him
to work all day for, a post-release case worker discovered
the boy starving, malnourished and imprisoned in a
basement.

Democrats used images of children in detention to attack

Trump as inhumane – until they realized the images were
taken in 2014 when migrants flooded the border because of
Obama’s migration friendly policies.

According to the 56 page investigative report released in

January 2016, the Office of Refugee Resettlement, an
agency of the Department of Health and Human Services
failed to properly vet government approved caretakers who
claimed the children, placed children in homes without
visiting the locations, permitted the adults who claimed the
children to obtain custody of multiple unrelated children
and ignored “serious trafficking indicators.”

Once the children were placed in the homes of the

government approved caretakers, not only did the agency
fail to provide any oversight of the children’s well being,
but allowed the adult sponsors to prevent caseworkers
from providing them post-release services. Breitbart’s Brandon Darby has documented the conditions
child illegal immigrants endured when Democrats were in
“HHS places children with individuals about whom it control of the White House.
knows relatively little and without verifying the limited
information provided by sponsors about their alleged
relationship with the child,” the report said.

The report details at least 30 instances

of unaccompanied children that had
been trafficked because of the Obama
administration’s laxed policies and
procedures.

430
.

431
 Rudy G: In Wake Of Doj IG Report
Showing FBI Bias, Sessions And Rosenstein Must Pull The
Plug On Mueller Witch Hunt
Posted On June 16, 2018
(National Sentinel) No Legitimacy: While Justice
Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s
extensive report failed specifically state the obvious —
that there was plenty of anti-Trump bias in the FBI’s
investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails — POTUS
lawyer Rudy Giuliana says it’s clear that special counsel
Robert Mueller’s witch hunt has to end.
As reported by The Western Journal:
The Department of Justice Inspector
General’s report that disclosed widespread
anti-Trump bias is reason enough to halt
special counsel Robert Mueller’s
investigation into President Donald Trump,
Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump’s lawyers, said
Thursday.
Giuliani made the case that the report
proves the Mueller team is infested with the
same bias that the DOJ’s top watchdog
found was rampant in the FBI’s
investigation of Hillary Clinton.
The report, which can be read at the
Justice Department’s website, depicted a
pervasive culture of bias against Trump at
the FBI and Justice Department. The report
did not dispute the findings of the year-long
investigation into former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email
server while she was secretary of state, but
said that the rampant bias was a threat to
432
the public’s ability to trust the nation’s top
law enforcement officials.
Some individuals mentioned in the report
have had roles in the Mueller investigation.
For example, FBI special counsel Lisa
Page and FBI Deputy Assistant Director
Peter Strzok sent anti-Trump text
messages, including one in which Strzok,
talking about Trump potentially being
elected president, wrote, “We’ll stop it.”
Strozek at one point worked on the Mueller
investigation.
An FBI attorney who spent time on the
Mueller investigation texted, “Viva le
resistance” after Trump was elected
president, the report said.
“I believe that (Deputy Attorney General)
Rod Rosenstein and (Attorney General)
Jeff Sessions have a chance to redeem
themselves and that chance comes about
tomorrow. It doesn’t go beyond tomorrow,”
Giuliani said during his appearance on Fox
News‘ Sean Hannity Friday.
“Tomorrow, Mueller should be suspended
and honest people should be brought in,
impartial people to investigate these people
like Strzok,” he added. “Strzok should be in
jail by the end of next week.”
Noting that he was speaking for himself and not his client,
POTUS Trump, Giuliani said the president was
nevertheless justified in his criticism of the Mueller probe
as a “witch hunt” as well as his firing of former FBI
Director James Comey.
“We are way beyond Hillary Clinton. We
now have an investigation that in the words
of President Donald Trump from the very
beginning has been a fix, a frame-up, and a
witch-hunt. It was led by Peter Strzok, who
is disgraceful and even for the present
director of the FBI to have him there suspend his investigation,” Giuliani said,
tomorrow would be disgraceful. according to Real Clear Politics.
“Every FBI agent should demand that that
man be fired and tomorrow Mueller should
.

433
 Politifact Rules It's 'True' That Democrats Are Near 'Their
Lowest Representation' In 100 Years
By Tim Graham
June 18, 2018 7:47 AM EDT
Our News Analysis Division has given this fact checker a
rating of:
The Real Deal
It's not surprising that PolitiFact would rule that a CNN
host was "True." But it was surprising that Fareed
Zakaria's "True" statement was
"Yes, the Democratic Party is at nearly its
weakest point in a century."
So why is that a surprise? Because our liberal media has
this amazing tendency to spend all its political-pundit time
discussing the terrible shape the Republican Party is in.
"Over the last decade the center left has
been destroyed electorally across the
West.Unless Democrats face up to this
reality and devise a strategy to reverse this
tidal wave of defeat, they might find
themselves surprised one more time this
November," Zakaria proclaimed on his
opening commentary on June 10. "When
you tally up their representation in
Congress, state legislatures and
governorships, the Democrats almost have
their lowest representation in about 100
years."
PolitiFact's John Kruzel cited the Real Clear Politics
index:
Under the RCP index, we found three
historical instances where Democrats held
a weaker position, relative to Republicans,
.
434
than they did following the 2016 election: in
1920, 1926 and 1928.
Given Zakaria’s hedging — he said Democrats almost
have their lowest representation in about 100 years — we
think his claim passes muster.
It doesn't look so bad in the Senate (where Republican
have a narrow 51-seat majority) and the number of House
Democrats has been lower than the current 193. But it's
tougher out in the states, where the R's lead the D's in
governorships 33 to 16 (Alaska has an independent). And
state legislatures?
John Mahoney, a policy specialist at the National
Conference of State Legislatures, said it was accurate to
say Democrats are at near-historical lows in this arena.
"There are currently 3,125 Ds serving in
state legislatures, which is the lowest since
1928 when there were 3,057 Ds serving,"
Mahoney said.
Someone at Politifact (or a tipster) must have thought
these facts must have been wrong.
But Zakaria is hoping for a resurgence on the left,
concluding:
"The left has always been about a hopeful
vision of the future, one in which everyone
prospers. But when a large part of the
public is fearful and pessimistic, and
nostalgic for a world gone by, offering hope
becomes a hard sell."
We have rated this PolitiFact "fact check" as The Real
Deal. For similar analyses, please visit our Fact-Checking
the Fact-Checkers site.
MUST READ: Mueller’s Bumbling And Hysterical Special
Counsel Team Is Getting Pummeled In Court –
Media Is Ignoring All Of This
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 8:00 Am
The attorneys representing Concord
Management, one of the Russian
Companies that the corrupt Mueller
team accused of impacting the 2016
Presidential election, crushed the
“Unlawfully Appointed Special Counsel”
in court last week again.
They continue to make a laughing stock
out of the Mueller team of misfit and
conflicted attorneys.
Mueller’s team of ignorant and misguided attorneys really
have no chance. They never expected anyone to take them
to court on their fake Russian indictments and are certainly
no match for the attorneys representing Concord
Management.
435
Proverbial Ham Sandwich
We first reported that Concord Management’s lawyer’s
previously said Mueller indicted “the proverbial ham
sandwich.”
The reason the Concord Management
attorneys called the case a ‘proverbial
ham sandwich’ was because one of the
entities indicted by the Mueller team,
Concord Catering, was not in
existence at the time the
crimes were alleged to have
taken place.
Next we reported on May 18th that the
Mueller case against the Russians was
falling apart. Lawyers defending the
Russian company Concord
Management indicted by the corrupt
Mueller team again called out Mueller’s
liberal hacks and labeled their
allegations as “made up” nonsense.
Concord Management’s lawyers revealed that Mueller’s
team ignored over 70 discovery requests they had made for
information before the case. In response Mueller’s team
offered to give Concord Management’s lawyers a massive
amount of social media data from those dangerous trolls
(jk) who sought to influence the US election and the
majority of it was in RUSSIAN. Mueller’s lawyers then
admitted they don’t even have English translations for the
Russian social media posts.
So Mueller’s lawyers don’t have English
translations to the Russian social media
posts but we’re supposed to believe
that Americans were influenced by
these posts?
Then among other things previously reported, Mueller’s
corrupt attorney Jeannie Rhee went on to align the 10
Russians identified by the Mueller team as members of an
‘organization’. The Russian company’s attorney
responded to the judge who apparently understood that
these Russians were all members of
Management.
He said:
No that’s not correct. The individual
defendants? No. It’s not even alleged who
they are. They’re alleged to be
associated with something called an
“organization,” which is a made up
thing by the special counsel.
They just made it up, and they
called it an “organization”. We’re
not even alleged to be part of the
organization. We’re alleged to have funded
it. But those people don’t work for us. It’s
not alleged they they work for us.
Now this weekend the Concord Management team filed a
motion against the Mueller team’s protective order request
Concord to conceal all data related to their case. The Concord team
states in their motion filed June 14th (emphasis added) –
Having produced not one iota of discovery in this criminal
case the unlawfully appointed Special Counsel
requests a special and unprecedented blanket protective
order covering tens of millions of pages of unclassified
discovery. Having made this special request based on a
secret submission to the Court and a hysterical
dithyramb about the future of the American elections,
one would think that the Special Counsel would cite to
case holdings that support this remarkable request. But no,
instead, the Special Counsel seeks to equate this make-
believe electioneering case to others involving
international terrorism and major drug trafficking, and
relies only on irrelevant dicta from inappropriate, primarily
out-of-circuit cases. In short, fake law, which is
much more dangerous than fake news.
436
It’s more than clear that dirty cop Robert Mueller rolled chance against these guys, they might
out this indictment of Russians as a PR stunt to justify his as well drop all charges now and plead
witch hunt; his team is not prepared to try this case and it’s guilty to making up Russian collusion
hilarious to watch as they struggle and look like the crimes for the sole purpose of removing
corrupt amateurs that they are. President Trump from his duly elected
position as President of the United
Concord Management’s States.
attorneys are like Marvel super
heroes taking on Mueller’s
corrupt gang of teletubbies!

Mueller’s ignorant and conflicted

investigators and attorneys have no
.

437
 Gowdy To Rosenstein And Wray: ‘Give Congress
Documents OR Deal With POTUS And CONTEMPT’
Posted On June 18, 2018
(National Sentinel) No More Stalling: GOP Rep. Trey
Gowdy laid down a gauntlet for DoJ Deputy Attorney Rod
Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray on Sunday:
Give Congres the documents it subpoenaed months ago or
face some very unpleasant consequences.
In May, House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin
Nunes, R-Calif., accused the Justice Department of
stonewalling Congress over documents relating to the
FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions responded in typical
fashion: He is joining in the effort to stonewall
Congress in a manner he would have never put up with
when he was still a serving member of the Senate.
Now, the stonewallers have pushed lawmakers past the
point of no return: It’s either give up the documents or face
contempt charges that are very likely going to draw the ire
of POTUS Trump.
House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., led a meeting Friday
night with key lawmakers and top officials from the FBI
and DoJ, Gowdy, R-S.C., noted.
438
“Under the heading of minor miracles, you
had members of the House working on a
Friday night,” Gowdy said. “Paul Ryan led
this meeting. You had [House Intelligence
Committee Chair] Devin Nunes, [House
Judiciary Committee Chair] Bob Goodlatte,
myself and everyone you can think of from
the FBI and the DOJ, and we went item by
item on both of those outstanding
subpoenas.
And Paul made it very clear; there’s going to be action on
the floor of the House this week if the FBI and DOJ do not
comply with our subpoena request,” he continued.
“So Rod Rosenstein, Chris Wray you were
in the meeting, you understood him just as
clearly as I did. We’re going to get
compliance or the House of
Representatives is going to use its full
arsenal of constitutional weapons to gain
compliance.”
He noted further: “I don’t want the drama, I
want the documents.”
He was also extremely critical of the DoJ and FBI
following Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s damning
report last week which confirmed that officials were
attempting to “stop” POTUS Trump’s presidential bid.
“I don’t know what [Special Counsel
Robert] Mueller has,” he said. “I do know
this: that bias is so pervasive and everyone
who has ever stood in front of a jury and
had to explain it in a way will tell you it is
the most miserable feeling in the world and
I’ve never seen this level of bias.”
 White House Deputy Press Secretary:
Democrat Policies Put Drug Cartels And Child Smugglers
In Business (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 8:32 Am

White House Deputy Press Secretary
Hogan Gidly joined FOX and Friends on
Monday morning to discuss the uproar
Democrat media hysterics over the
detention of illegal children.
This is the latest theatrics coming from the Democrat Party
since the Russia witch hunt fell apart.
Hogan Gidly put the blame squarely on
the pro-cartel Democrat Party.
Hogan Gidly: Let’s be clear about what they’re asking us
to understand and believe. Democrats are saying you can’t
deport them, you can’t detain them, you can’t prosecute
them. The only thing you can do per a Democrat is to
release them into the interior without any ramification for
what they’ve done by breaking our laws. It’s absolutely
incredible… The Democrat’s policies put the drug cartels
in business. They raking in money hand over fist sending
people to this country carrying drugs. And also the child
smuggling industry. International child smuggling is up.
Via FOX and Friends:

439
 BRAVO! Trump Supporter Storms Stage At De Niro’s
Broadway Show — Unfurls MAGA 2020 Flag
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 9:15 Am

The US President and De Niro have been

involved in a public spat since the 74-year-
old Hollywood actor received a standing
ovation for yelling ‘F*** Trump’ on stage at
the Tony Awards in New York earlier this
month.

Bravo!

A Trump supporter stormed the stage at

Robert De Niro’s play on Broadway this
weekend.

The Trump suporter unfurled a #MAGA

2020 flag on the stage.

This comes a week after De Niro was given a standing

ovation from east coast elites for screaming, “F*ck
Trump!” at the Tony Awards.

Lovely people.

Centrist Joe Del Vicario was in the audience and took a

shot of the protester.
Trump, 72, responded by labelling The Godfather II star
The Daily Mail reported: a ‘very low IQ individual’ on Twitter.

During the play, directed by De Niro and four-time Tony

A Donald Trump fan stormed the stage
during a Broadway musical directed by
Robert De Niro to protest at the Hollywood
actor’s foul-mouthed tirade against the
President last week.
The rogue demonstrator unfurled a ‘Keep
America Great’ banner during the curtain
call of A Bronx Tale, directed by De Niro, at
the Longacre Theatre in New York on
Saturday.
440
Award winner Jerry Zaks – a theatre-goer stood up and
started waving the flag at the front of the stage.
It read ‘Keep America Great’ as well as ‘Trump 2020’.
Joe Del Vicario took a picture of the incident and said:
‘The times we live in. At the end of A
Bronx Tale, a man turned around and
faced the audience to show us how big of a
pair he has.
.

441
 President Trump Slams The Russia Witch Hunt: Comey
And Mueller Are ‘Best Friends’
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 1:55 Pm

President Trump attacked the Russia
witch hunt Monday morning, calling out
Mueller and Comey for their cozy
relationship, and obvious conflict of
interest.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring
to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.

Other profanity-laced text messages between Strzok and

Page showed their contempt for Donald Trump.

Comey is directly responsible for his bureau; Strzok took

Special Counsel’s are appointed if the Justice Department
is unable to carry out an investigation due to conflicts of
interest.
Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein all have obvious conflicts
of interest, further tainting the Special Counsel
investigation.
marching orders from Comey.
Now Comey’s buddy, another former FBI Director, Robert
Mueller is hunting down President Trump.
Trump tweeted: Comey gave Strzok his marching orders.
Mueller is Comey’s best friend. Witch Hunt!

The Inspector General report released last Thursday

revealed FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, under Comey’s
Directorship, had it out for Trump.

The Trump-hating FBI agent sent his

mistress Lisa Page a text message
saying “we’ll stop” Trump from
becoming President.

This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days

after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.

442
 BREAKING: IG Horowitz Confirms Comey Under
Investigation For Handling Of Classified Memos
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 2:08 Pm

Inspector General Horowitz confirmed
Monday during a Congressional hearing
Comey is under investigation for his
handling of classified information.
Comey gave contents of his memos to his ‘friend’ Daniel
Richman to leak to the New York Times in order to
prompt a Special Counsel.
On Monday, Inspector General Horowitz was asked by
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley ‘if the IG is
investigating Comey’s handling of his memos about
Trump.’

Horowitz replied in the affirmative.

“Yes, we’re investigating it and will produce a report on

it.”

Fired FBI Director James Comey penned 7 memos

stemming from 9 conversations with President Trump.

At least 4 of 7 of the memos contained classified

information. Story developing…

443
 WTH…? IG Withholding Additional
Anti-Trump Text Messages From Lisa Page To
Andrew McCabe From Public
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 3:04 Pm
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
revealed in a Congressional hearing in
front of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Monday there are additional anti-Trump
text messages from Lisa Page to
Andrew McCabe that have been
withheld from the public.
Inspector General Horowitz admitted in a Congressional
hearing there are additional anti-Trump text messages from
FBI lawyer Lisa Page to her boss Andrew McCabe that
have been withheld from the public.
Horowitz also disclosed there are additional text messages
between the FBI lovebirds Lisa Page and Peter Strzok that
still have not been recovered.
Paul Sperry reported: BREAKING: Lisa Page sent
similarly anti-Trump text messages to her boss Andrew
McCabe, yet the IG has withheld these texts from the
public. Why?
Inspector General Horowitz also admitted after four
different attempts, including help from the Department of
444
Defense, his staff was unable to recover all ‘missing’ text
messages from the FBI lovebirds.
The Inspector General says he is preparing a separate
report to recover the text messages.
Sperry reported: BREAKING: IG Horowitz is preparing
a separate report on efforts to recover missing Stzok &
Page text messages from the FBI.
Critical gaps remain, including Dec 15, 2016-May 17,
2017 & July 1, 2017-July 28, 2017. The FBI turned over
77,322 texts of which Congress has seen 40,000.
What we know so far…
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter
Strzok sent his mistress Lisa Page a
text message saying “we’ll stop” Trump
from becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
 there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring
to Andrew McCabe.
.
445
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.
The IG is hiding very damning text messages from Page,
Strzok and McCabe from the public. Why?
 Mccabe Refuses To Testify At Senate Judiciary Hearing –
Invokes 5th Amendment Rights
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 3:33 Pm

On Monday, former FBI Deputy Director
Andrew McCabe refused to testify to the
Senate Judiciary Committee about the
IG report’s findings on the FBI’s
handling of the Clinton email
investigation.
McCabe invoked his 5th Amendment
rights on Monday after failing to receive
immunity from prosecution in exchange
for his testimony.
prosecution in exchange for his testimony because of his
criminal referral.
‘If McCabe is not granted immunity, he will
invoke his 5th Amendment privilege’, said
Bromwich.
Fox News Senate reporter, Chad Pergram reported
McCabe indeed invoked his 5th Amendment rights and
was a no-show Monday.

Also absent from the Congressional hearing was fired FBI

Director James Comey and former Attorney General
Loretta Lynch.

Pergram reported: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman

Chuck Grassley (R-IA) notes they invited former Deputy
FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI Director James
Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch to
testify at IG hrng. Grassley says McCabe invoked the 5th.

In a letter sent to Chairman Grassley on

June 4th, Andrew McCabe’s attorney
Michael Bromwich requested the Senate
Judiciary Committee grant the former
FBI official immunity from prosecution
in exchange for testifying at next week’s
Congressional hearing on the FBI’s
handling of the Clinton investigation.

On page 3 of the letter, Bromwich requested the Senate Even though McCabe invoked his 5th Amendment rights,
Judiciary Committee grant McCabe immunity from lawmakers can still issue him a subpoena and ultimately
threaten contempt charges.
.

446
 FBI Director Wray Praises Mueller “I Do Not Believe
Special Counsel Mueller Is On A Witch Hunt” (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 4:53 Pm

What a disgrace.
FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to
the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday on The top officials at the FBI and DOJ hated Donald Trump
the IG report’s findings of the Clinton email and his supporters.
investigation.
The Deep State hacks called Trump supporters: F***ing
Christopher Wray told Senator Leahy (D-VT) Idiots, Sad, Pathetic, Retarded.
that Robert Mueller’s investigation is ‘not a
witch hunt.’ VIDEO:

FBI Director Wray once again proves he

serves the Deep State swamp rather than
the interests of the American people.

FBI Director Christopher Wray held a press conference

last Thursday afternoon from the FBI headquarters in DC
following the release of the IG report was released.
Wray defended the swamp; he said the IG report “did not
find any evidence of political bias or improper
considerations actually impacting the investigation under
review.”
On Monday, the FBI Director praised Mueller and said the
dirty cop is not on a witch hunt.
Truly disgusting.
We shouldn’t be surprised as Wray defended the corrupt
officials in the FBI brass last week in a disgraceful press
conference.
Chris Wray told reporters there was “no evidence of
political bias.”
This is the same FBI that had spies inside the Trump
campaign and continued to spy on President-elect Trump
after his election and inauguration.
And the FBI spy infiltrating the Trump campaign openly
advocated for Hillary Clinton during the election.
According to Wray, there’s no political bias and Mueller is
not on a witch hunt despite KGB tactics of breaking down
doors and raiding anyone connected to the president
without even naming the crime.

Americans are disgusted after reading more anti-Trump Wray needs to go.
text messages from FBI agents.

447
 Grassley Demands Probe Into Comey’s Use Of Secret
Gmail Account For FBI Business
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 5:31 Pm
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck
Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to FBI
Director Christopher Wray on Monday
demanding access to James Comey’s
private Gmail account he used for
official FBI business.
The FBI has until June 29th to response
to Grassley’s letter.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
The IG report identified FIVE different instances where
Comey used a Gmail account to conduct official FBI
business, CNBC reported.
Senator Grassley said Comey’s use of a
private email account raises some
“serious questions,” being that the
bureau was investigating Hillary Clinton
for the same misconduct:
It is disturbing that FBI employees tasked with
investigating Secretary Clinton, including the former
Director, appear to have engaged in strikingly similar
conduct. Although it does not appear as egregious and
prolonged, they also used non-government systems for
official work.
448
According to the IG report released last
Thursday, then-FBI Director James
Comey used a secret Gmail account
when conducting FBI business, despite
warning other agents they would be in
“huge trouble” if they did the same
thing.
Comey’s frequent use of a personal email account for
unclassified FBI business was “inconsistent with” the
policy statement for email use by the Justice Department,
according to a report issued by the Office of the Inspector
General.
The findings were published on page 425 of the report.
Grassley wants all of Comey’s private
emails to make sure classified
information was not transmitted:
In the FBI’s response to the Inspector General’s report, it
claims, “there is no finding or indication that any classified
material ever transited former Director Comey’s, Ms.
Page’s, or Mr. Strzok’s personal devices or accounts.”9
However, unless the FBI has obtained and examined those
records, then it simply cannot know one way or the other.
Inspector General Horowitz also
confirmed Monday during a
Congressional hearing Comey is under
investigation for his mishandling of
classified memos.
 HUGE! Top Clinton Campaign Operative And AG Lynch
Reportedly Exchanged “Highly Classified Material”
During Election …Updated
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 6:07 Pm

Attorney General Lynch and a person by the name of

Amanda Renteria?

Inspector General Horowitz: I’m not sure what I can say

about that publicly so would ask you if I can get back to
you.

Via Joe Palmer:

Inspector General Michael Horowitz and

FBI Chief Chris Wray testified before the
Senate Intelligence Committee on
Monday afternoon.

During the testimony IG Horowitz

admitted that top level Clinton 2016
campaign operative Amanda Renteria
and Attorney General Loretta Lynch
exchanged “highly classified material”
with each other in 2016.

Amanda Renteria worked for United States Senators

Dianne Feinstein and Debbie Stabenow. She was hired as
the Hillary campaign’s “Hispanic woman position” on the
campaign.

UPDATE— Amanda Renteria has denied

these allegations for the past year.
The “highly classified” material was so More…
secret that Inspector General Michael
Horowitz refused to talk about it during
the Senate hearing on Monday.

Senator Kennedy: Your index does it contain or discuss

an email that refers to a conversation allegedly between

449
.

450
 Crooked Hillary Cites Bible Verse To Fight Against
‘Trump’s Cruel Immigration Policy’ – Twitter Responds
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 6:38 Pm

“All told the situation on the border is

extremely nuanced right now and
rampant for fraudulent asylum claims.
Authorities see clear evidence of illegals
being coached by traffickers on how to
circumvent US law,” continued Enjeti.
President Trump blasted the Democrats
over immigration laws in a barrage of
tweets:

Hillary Clinton, one of the most corrupt, criminal liars to

ever hold public office in this country had the nerve to cite
a Bible verse to fight against current immigration laws that
separate illegal alien children from ‘parents’ at the border.

This exact law was in place during the Obama years, but
now since Trump is president, it is suddenly a
humanitarian crisis and Republicans are evil for allowing it
to happen.

We have no definitive proof the children are even related

to the adults they show up with at the border which only
encourages child trafficking.

In fact, Saagar Enjeti from The Daily

Caller reports, “single males with
‘children’ are increasingly arriving.
Neither the child nor the adult can
answer basic questions about each
other, authorities suspect rampant
fraud.”

451
 Twitter users hammered Hillary.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recently cited Romans 13

to defend immigration policy.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and

his clear and wise command in Romans
13, to obey the laws of the government
because God has ordained them for the
purpose of order,” Sessions said. “Orderly
and lawful processes are good in
themselves and protect the weak and
lawful.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders also

said something similar later in a press briefing:

“It is very biblical to enforce the law.”

Crooked Hillary had the nerve to cite
Matthew 19:14 on Monday as she
attacked the Trump administration.

Old Crooked even begged for more

money.

452
.

453
 Jeb! Bush Joins First Ladies And
Demands Trump End “Heartless” Child Border Policy
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 7:45 Pm

Via Breitbart:

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush is

calling on President Donald Trump to end
the “heartless” policy of separating
immigrant children from their parents at the
U.S. border.
“Children shouldn’t be used as a
negotiating tool,” Bush tweeted on Monday.
“@realDonaldTrump should end this
heartless policy and Congress should get
Former First Ladies Laura Bush, an immigration deal done that provides for
asylum reform, border security and a path
Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, and
to citizenship for Dreamers.”
Rosalynn Carter all condemned the
separating illegals from their children at
the border.

Rosalynn called the law a “shame on

our country.”
And now they have an ally in Jeb! Bush.

Jeb! never misses an opportunity to trash President Trump.

.

454
 Mitchell Invites Guest To Slam 'Evil,' 'Sin' Of Trump
Enforcing Immigration Law
By Brad Wilmouth
June 18, 2018 8:17 PM EDT
After making a strong push last week to promote the views
of religious liberals to advocate against the Trump
administration strictly enforcing immigration laws,
Monday saw the liberal Bible-thumping go into overdrive
as MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell brought aboard Father
James Martin, and cued him up to complain that Trump's
immigration policies are "sinful" and to repeatedly attach
the word "evil" to the government keeping children in a
separate facility while their parents are prosecuted for
illegally crossing the border.
At 12:26 p.m. Eastern, on her Andrea Mitchell Reports
show, the MSNBC host introduced the segment by
recalling that
"a growing number of religious leaders,
including the American Council of Catholic
Bishops, rabbinical groups, even
evangelicals who have in the past
supported President Trump, are imploring
the White House to change this policy."
Without informing viewers that it was religious liberals
who started arguing that the Trump administration is
violating the Christian Bible, leading Attorney General
Jeff Sessions to quote Scripture last week in response,
Mitchell began by turning to Father Martin and posing:
"I've been following you on Twitter. You have tried to set
the record straight in terms of the biblical verses that are
being used by Jeff Sessions, Sarah Sanders, and others, to
justify this policy. Help explain it for our viewers."
Father Martin recalled that the biblical portion read by
Sessions
455
"has been used to justify slavery at different
points and even Nazi-era laws."
He soon complained that
"I think those uses of Scripture to justify
what is sinful, I think, is obscene," and then
added that "it's really insane to use the
Bible to justify sin."
Mitchell soon brought up the Statue of Liberty, noting that
it is
"just about the anniversary of the Statue of
Liberty being delivered from France to us in
the 19th century."
Father Martin soon continued to rail against the separation
of illegal immigrant families during processing as he
complained that "it's un-Christian, and it's sinful," and
declared that people "need to call it what it is, which is
'sin.'"
The MSNBC host further cued up her guest for more
bashing of the Trump administration as she recounted,
"And you said last night on Twitter that it
was 'evil,'" leading him to respond: "It is
evil. I mean, we need to call it 'evil.' It
clearly does not proceed from God."
Father Martin had used the word "evil" a total of five times
by the time he reached the end of his rant:
It's also something that -- as we see, sadly
-- is cloaked in lies, which is another way of
recognizing something that is evil, so it has
all the hallmarks of evil. I don't know what
more we can say. We're choosing to do evil
actions, and the only thing that we can say
is that, you know, people who participate in
these things are also going to be judged
pretty harshly, I would think.
As if she were previously a model of journalistic
neutrality, Mitchell then suggested that journalists are
justified in taking a political position against such
determined enforcement of immigration laws by the
Trump administration:
This has precipitated a real soul-searching
among journalists because those of us
raised in the traditional frame of "On the
one hand and on the other hand," are
finding that we can no longer stand quietly
.
456
and just describe this policy without
pointing out that this is being
misrepresented, and it's very
uncomfortable for a lot of people of my
generation of journalists to constantly be
saying the President "Misrepresented, he
misspoke, this is a lie, this is not true," but
people have to speak out.
 VIDEO: The Gateway Pundit Wrap With Lukasz Dusza:
Trump & Kim Jong Un Historic Meeting
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 8:36 Pm

The agency did not like this and more

specifically, they disliked the photo that
Dusza shared on Facebook of President
Trump with a caption that read: “My
President”.

Lukasz was informed that his contract had been terminated

due to his “polarizing views.”

Today Lukasz Dusza published his first video for The

Gateway Pundit:

Trump & Kim Jong Un Historic Meeting

Lukasz Dusza completed his first video
for The Gateway Pundit today!

We wrote about Lukasz Dusza last year. Lukasz was fired

from his talent agency because he supported Donald
Trump.

457
 IT WAS A SET-UP: Trump Campaign Aide Reveals
Mueller Knew More About FBI Informant Than He Did
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 9:46 Pm

On Monday Michael Caputo joined Sean Hannity to

discuss his run-in with the FBI informant.

Michael Caputo: When I spoke to the Mueller

The Deep State Spying Scandal on the
Trump Campaign will go down as the
largest political scandal in US history.
investigation about this I told them that I assumed he was a
Russian but I thought he was an American citizen. As it
turned out the Mueller investigation already knew that he
was a Russian citizen and not an American citizen. That
really set off alarm bells for me. Because when I disclosed
this to the Mueller investigation unprompted they knew
more about it than I did. They knew he was a Russian
citizen not an American.
Via Hannity:

As Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit reported in May —

At Least 6 and Potentially 7 Known and Suspected

Intelligence Informants Accused of Spying on Trump
Campaign

And now there are more.

Trump associates Roger Stone and Michael Caputo were

approached by another FBI informant during their
campaign in the Deep State’s quest to tie Donald Trump to
Putin’s Russia.

And — once again — neither of them

took the bait.
.

458
 DISGRACEFUL! AWOL Sessions Says He Will Let
Rosenstein Continue To Oversee Mueller Witch Hunt
Despite Conflicts (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 18, 2018, 10:55 Pm

WHAT A DISGRACE! given the fact that he did sign one of those
AG Jeff Sessions went on with Laura FISA warrants and that’s a big controversy
in this case?
Ingraham on Monday to discuss
immigration and the Mueller witch hunt.
Jeff Sessions: I am not involved in that. He is the acting
Attorney General for that matter and he has to make his
own decision as I had to make my decision.

That’s dereliction of duty.

Jeff Sessions needs to be fired for the
future of this country.

This guy is not up to the job of Attorney General.

What a disgrace.

Via The Ingraham Angle:

During their discussion Laura asked the AWOL Attorney
General why he recused himself from the Trump-Russia
collusion witch hunt for talking to the ambassador at
cocktail parties but allows Rosenstein to oversee the witch
hunt after he signed the fraudulent FISA memo to spy on
Trump?

Here’s his answer:

Laura Ingraham:

Attorney General Sessions, just one more

question. Are you involved at all in
discussions about a possible recusal of
Rod Rosenstein of overseeing Mueller
.

459
 James Woods Has Perfect Response To Crooked Hillary’s
Faux Outrage Over ‘Trump’s Immigration Policy’
By Cristina Laila
June 18, 2018, 11:17 Pm

In fact, Saagar Enjeti from The Daily

Hillary Clinton unleashed a Twitter rant
Monday showing faux outrage over an
immigration policy that separates illegal
alien children from their ‘parents’ at the
border.
Hillary Clinton has no room to talk; she
should sit this one out.
Caller reports, “single males with
‘children’ are increasingly arriving.
Neither the child nor the adult can
answer basic questions about each
other, authorities suspect rampant
fraud.”
Hillary Clinton tweeted: Like so many others, I am
horrified and heartbroken by what is happening to
immigrant kids and families because of this
administration’s disastrous policies.

Right. Hillary Clinton is ‘horrified and heartbroken.’

James Woods had the perfect response

and moved in with a kill shot.
Hillary Clinton, one of the most corrupt, criminal liars to Woods tweeted:
ever hold public office in this country had the nerve to cite Now do Haiti… #ClintonFoundationCrimes
a Bible verse and beg for money from her Twitter account
to fight against current immigration laws that separate
illegal alien children from ‘parents’ at the border.

This exact law was in place during the Obama years, but
now since Trump is president, it is suddenly a
humanitarian crisis and Republicans are evil for allowing it
to happen.

We have no definitive proof the children are even related

to the adults they show up with at the border which only
encourages child trafficking.

Ouch! This is why we love James Woods!

.

460
 Trump Directs Pentagon To Create ‘Space Force,’ After
Obama Gutted NASA For ‘Feel Good’ Muslim Outreach
Project (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 18, 2018, 11:26 Pm

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was “When it comes to defending America, it is
preparing to take Americans back to the Moon and on to not enough to merely have an American
Mars—until President Obama took office. presence in space. We must have
American dominance in space,” the
Obama crippled NASA’s efforts to send astronauts beyond president declared in the White House East
low Earth orbit without international assistance and needed Room in a meeting of the National Space
the help of allies to make it to Mars. Council. “Very importantly, I’m hereby
directing the Department of Defense and
The former president redirected America’s space agency Pentagon to immediately begin the process
from pioneering the future in space exploration and necessary to establish the Space Force as
scientific discovery to advancing his so-called social the sixth branch of the armed forces.”
justice agenda — push radical global warming extremism “We are going to have the Air Force and
and Muslim outreach. we are going to have the Space Force:
separate but equal, it is going to be
Obama directed NASA administrator Charles Bolden to something so important,” he said.
make Muslim outreach a top priority for the agency.
The initiative, Trump explained, would protect American
interests in space through monitoring commercial traffic
and debris and would be “great not only in terms of jobs
and everything else, it’s great for the psyche of our
country.”

Trump tasked Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of

the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with the undertaking of creating
the additional branch of the military.

“General Dunford, if you would carry that

President Trump is in the process of restoring America’s
assignment out, I would be very greatly
space exploration program to its former glory.
honored,” Mr. Trump said from the podium,
after searching for him in the crowd.
The president announced Monday that he is directing the
Pentagon to establish the “Space Force” as a sixth branch “We got it,” the General replied.
to join the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and
Coast Guard dedicated to protecting American interests in
outer space.
461
 Cable News: 22 Comparisons Of Immigration Policy To
The Holocaust, Slavery
By Bill D'Agostino
June 18, 2018 11:55 PM EDT

“Increasingly, Donald Trump is turning

this nation into Nazi Germany and
turning these [detention centers] into
concentration camps.”

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, evidently eager to join in the

hyperventilating excitement, managed to last less than a
minute before evoking concentration camps while hosting
Hardball on Monday. Throughout the show, he repeatedly
interrupted guests to draw their attention to images of
crying children that flashed across the screen.

The pundit class have officially snapped over the Trump

administration’s zero-tolerance border enforcement policy.
Since Friday, the collective breakdown has yielded a total
of 22 instances in which cable news commentators
compared the separation of parents and children illegally
entering the country to World War II-era war crimes and
human rights violations.

The Holocaust was invoked 12 times across CNN and

MSNBC between June 15 and the 18th, generally in the
form of comparisons between DHS detention centers and
Nazi concentration camps. There were also six mentions of
Japanese-American internment camps, as well as four
comparisons to slavery.
On Friday, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough opened Morning
Joe with a tasteless Holocaust reference.
Media darling and former National Security Director
General Michael Hayden poured gasoline on the fire with a
June 16 tweet featuring an image of the Birkenau
concentration camp along with the text, “Other
governments have separated mothers and children,”:

“Children are being marched away to

showers,” he intoned, “just like the Nazis
said they were taking people to the
showers, and then they never came
back. You’d think they would use
another trick.”

Over the weekend, CNN political commentator Dave

Jacobson threw a miniature tantrum over the policy. On
Saturday’s CNN Newsroom during the 10 a.m. hour, he
opined,

“Donald Trump increasingly looks like
Hitler in Nazi Germany.”
The following day, he appeared again on Newsroom in the
afternoon to embellish on his already hysterical take:
While cooler heads in the media condemned this
comparison, Hayden later defended those statements
during two CNN appearances on Monday.

462
 “Now look, I know we’re not Nazi
Germany,” he said on New Day, “but there
is a commonality there.”
He repeated that point on The Situation Room that same
day:
“I knew it would be controversial, but I
felt a warning flare was necessary.”
Hayden’s tweet was also featured on five different
MSNBC shows on Monday, with hosts such as Nicolle
Wallace of Deadline: White House and Stephanie Ruhle of
MSNBC Live appearing reluctant even to criticize the
comparison.
“We don’t want to go too far, but is this
warning valid?” Ruhle pondered anxiously
on her 9 a.m. show.
Some pundits too squeamish for Holocaust references
instead made overtures to America’s Japanese internment
camps from World War II. MSNBC contributor Jonathan
Capehart mentioned both those camps and the Trail of
.
463
Tears on AM Joy, adding that he felt the practice was “very
American.” Leadership Development Strategist Kwame
Jackson echoed Capehart’s point later that day on MSNBC
Live with Yasmin Vossoughian:
We’re also talking about a legacy of this in the United
States of America, whether it was Native American family
separation, whether it was African slave separation,
whether it was the Japanese internment camps. So this is a
long line that we’re actually hearkening back to, that we
really should be ashamed of and look at where we come
from historically.
So absurd was the media's melodrama that even CNN’s
Brian Stelter felt the need to step in and pump the
proverbial brakes. On Sunday’s Reliable Sources, he posed
a challenge to his guests:
“Doesn’t the tone of this coverage
offend a great deal of Americans who
feel that the real scandal is that people
are entering the country illegally in the
first place?”
 Unhinged Democrat Releases Dumpster Fire Ad:
Perfectly Depicts Dem Party In One 40 Second Clip
(VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
June 19, 2018, 7:30 Am

This is a perfect encapsulation of the DC elites after 500

days of President Trump.

A billion dollars in marketing could not achieve this kind

of perfection.

For the record — That’s his real voice.

Thank you crackpot Richard Painter.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer should definitely

campaign with this guy.

464
 Viva Le Resistance… Rep. Devin Nunes Drops Clue On
French-Speaking Anti-Trump Hack In IG Report
By Jim Hoft
June 19, 2018, 8:12 Am

Perhaps mysterious lawyer is from

France?

Last week House Intel Chairman, Devin Nunes (R-CA)

dropped a bombshell on Fox News’ Ingraham Angle after
the IG report was released.

Nunes told Laura Ingraham that

“whistleblowers” inside of the FBI On Monday Devin Nunes continued to
tipped off House Intel Committee prod his followers on the French
members about Anthony Weiner’s speaking Trump-basher.
laptop in September of 2016.

Rep. Nunes has known about the lawbreaking and

corruption at the DOJ thanks to a few(?) honest agents in
the department.

Grab the popcorn.

Chuck Ross from The Daily Caller wrote a piece on the

mysterious Mueller lawyer who sent the anti-Trump tweets
after his election.

This weekend Intel Chief Devin Nunes (R-CA) sent out

tweets questioning the identity of the anti-Trump hack on
the Mueller team.

465
 WATCH=> Sarah Huckabee Sanders LAUNCHES
TRUTH BOMB On Laura Bush’s Family
Separation Comments
By Jim Hoft
June 19, 2018, 10:00 Am

“This law was actually signed into effect in

On Sunday Laura Bush compared 2008 under her husband’s leadership…
President Trump’s border policies with We’re not the ones responsible for creating
illegal aliens to Japanese internment this problem. We’ve inherited it.”
camps during World War II. Ouch.

Laura Bush — who did not vote for Donald Trump — Via Josh Caplan:
piled on the Trump administration for detaining illegal
alien children.

On Monday White House Spokeswoman

Sarah Huckabee Sanders dropped a
truth bomb on Laura Bush.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders:

466
 From Our UK Adorable Deplorables: Brexit Update And
Working To Make Britain Great Again
Guest post by Janice Atkinson
June 19, 2018, 11:11 Am
From our friends in the UK: Brexit
update and trying to Make Britain Great
Again
Hello my US cousins, I wish the UK had a leader like your
president.
Instead we have a weak, indecisive, accidental prime
minister in Theresa May. Weak because she cannot control
her government, indecisive because no one knows what
she stands for (a quote by Brexit Secretary David Davis, to
me some years ago, and is still true today, particularly over
Brexit), and accidental because the two front-runners in the
prime ministerial race, Michael Gove and Boris Johnson
had a public spat, caused by the former’s wife, which saw
Mrs May rise from failed home secretary to prime
minister. And she’s been a disaster ever since.
If we had Brexit supporting President Trump at the
negotiating table with the European Union, the art of the
deal would have been struck by now. He would have taken
the unelected and undemocratic Eurocrats into a private
room – devoid of spin doctors and government flunkies –
traded a deal and then announced it to the waiting press
corps, just like with Kim in Sing.
President Trump would know that he had the upper hand
in the Brexit negotiations. He would lay it out bare: you
sell us more goods than we sell to you, our budget deficit
is too high and we need to get it down, immigration is at a
tipping point – no more migrants, your liberal left
governments are collapsing all over Europe in favour of
my friends, the populists, we’re closing our borders so you
467
had better build your walls to keep the terrorists out and,
by the way, we’ve got 30 odd countries queuing up to do
free trade deals with us. Deal done, a free trade deal in
goods and services, benefitting both sides.
Yet Mrs May is allowing the Eurocrats to run rings around
us with no Brexit Blueprint even though we voted to Leave
two years ago and she’s meeting the heads of the EU
governments in a couple of weeks. Can you imagine your
president going into a lion’s den like that? Did I mention
she voted to Remain and stay shackled to the EU?
Then there is our antiquated, outdated and undemocratic
House of Lords that is trying to stop Brexit. The House of
Lords in its hey day was a debating and thoughtful
amending chamber with representatives who were enobled
because they had expertise in many areas. Now it is stuffed
full of party apparatchiks, failed former MPs, party donors
and friends of Tony Blair, David Cameron and someone
called Nick Clegg, who was deputy prime minister under
Cameron, all of whom are trying to thwart the people’s
referendum to leave the European Union.
They believe that the ordinary people did not know what
we were voting for. That we were all too stupid, too
ignorant, too uneducated and hate the EU because Nigel
Farage and right wing pundits told them it was the right
thing to do.
Mrs May, who does not have a working majority because
she stupidly called a general election last year and lost the
so-called Conservative’s majority, has to rely on those
very nice people from the Northern Irish Democratic
Union Party. All decent, real conservatives. The trouble is,
there are a number of Remainer MPs in her own ranks who
are also committing political suicide by defying her
government (and their boss), by voting against the
government’s Brexit Withdrawal Bill. They know she is
weak but the fear on the government’s side of a real
Marxist in Jeremy Corbyn, leader of Her Majesty’s
Opposition, occupying No.10 Downing Street is a very
real possibility.
The Remainer Rebels and the quislings in the Lords are
seeking a ‘Meaningful Vote’, ie not trusting the filthy
voters of the largest plebiscite the UK has ever had and
opinion polls that show over 70% of the people want the
government just to get on with Brexit.
They are busy digging their own graves. One long-
standing socialist member whom I like very much, Frank
Field MP, has tabled a Parliamentary Bill to abolish them.
This is not something I could ever have envisaged
supporting but now I do. It’s time to move to our second
chamber becoming elected.
As for the trade negotiations? You have Secretary of State
Wilbur Ross, who I met in a visit to DC in December. I sit
on the EU-US trade delegation committee and I travelled
to DC, with a number of senior MEPs from across the EU,
to meet counterparts in the Republican and Democrat
parties (the latter’s narrative: The Russians! it’s the
Russians that made Brexit happen. Jim Costa was told in
no uncertain terms what I thought of his conspiracy
theories. Yawn.). At a lunch Wilbur Ross addressed us. I
asked him to confirm the UK/US special relationship to
those in the room and to update us on a free trade
agreement between our two countries.
He had a very stark message for the MEPs in the room.
“Janice, absolutely our two countries have a long and
special relationship. Of course we’ll give the UK a free
trade deal, but first of all you musn’t take the bitter pill
.
468
[bad trade deal] that the EU will offer you and, secondly
the EU does not understand free trade, it’s a protectionist
racket”. My hero. Shocked MEPs all choking on their
soup, except me.
The art of the deal is also hampered because the EU’s trade
Commissioner is Cecilia Malmstrom, a former liberal
sociology lecturer and the so-called High Representative
(foreign affairs Commissioner) is a recycled communist,
one Federica Mogherini, who is an embarrassment on the
world stage, both of whom are incapable of understanding
business. Both women are over promoted gender quotas.
Though I do take heart, friends, the EU is collapsing in on
itself. With my friends in power in Austria and Italy, with
Poland, Slovenia and Hungary revolting, and with the real
possibility that Frau Merkel will be gone by the weekend
and other nation state elections looming with more
populists on the way, at least the voters in the EU are
doing what we in the UK and you in the US did, our
Deplorable EU voters are revolting.
Let’s Make Europe Great Again.
 HOROWITZ DROPS BOMBSHELL:
Hillary Clinton Was Not Formally Under FBI Investigation
At Any Time In 2015-2016
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 12:02 Pm

On Tuesday, Inspector General Michael

Horowitz testified in a joint
Congressional hearing to the House
Oversight and House Judiciary panels
about his review of the FBI’s
(mis)handling of the Clinton email
investigation.

So neither Hillary nor her top aides were

formally under investigation by the FBI
at any time in 2015-2016, tweeted
Sperry.

IG HOROWITZ DROPS BOMBSHELL DURING

SENATE TESTIMONY:

“Nobody was listed as a subject of this

House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) came out
swinging Tuesday in a a joint hearing held by the House
Oversight and House Judiciary Committees.
[Clinton email] investigation at any point in
time,” adding this was “surprising”
So neither Hillary nor her top aides were formally under
investigation by FBI at any time in 2015-2016!

Gowdy ripped into Comey in his opening statement,

stating, “we can’t survive with a justice system we don’t
trust.”

Investigative journalist Paul Sperry reported Horowitz

dropped a bombshell in his testimony.

Horowitz revealed the FBI never named

a target or even a subject in the Clinton
email probe!

Sperry tweeted: BREAKING: IG Horowitz revealed in

Senate testimony FBI never named a target or even subject
in Clinton probe. Not Mills, Abedin, Combetta or Clinton
herself. “Nobody was listed as a subject of this
investigation at any point in time,” adding this was
“surprising” for a crim probe

469
 No subjects were named, immunity was handed out like
candy and Hillary was exonerated before witnesses were
interviewed, including Hillary Clinton herself.

Hillary Clinton’s ‘interview’ with the FBI wasn’t even

under oath.

Even more egregious, Hillary discussed pregnancy and

President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton reacted to this
bombshell bias from the FBI.
babies during the majority of the 2.5 hour FBI interview
because one of her lawyers was pregnant at the time.
Inspector General Horowitz also testified in front of the
Senate Judiciary Committee Monday.

The entire ‘FBI investigation’ into Hillary Clinton’s use of

a private server was a complete sham.
.

470
Trump’s 2020 Campaign Manager Brad Parscale Calls For
End Of Mueller Investigation, AG Sessions To Be Fired
By Jacob Wohl
June 19, 2018, 12:31 Pm
Following the release of the bombshell DOJ Office of
Inspector General Report last week and the congressional
testimony by Inspector General Horowitz, President
Trump’s 2020 Campaign Manager Brad Parscale called for
the firing of AG Jeff Sessions and the ending of the
Mueller investigation.
Brad Parscale tweeted Tuesday morning:
“Time to fire Sessions, End the Mueller
investigation, You can’t obstruct something
that was phony against you, The IG report
gives President Trump the truth to end it
all.”
The OIG Report uncovered thousands of texts between
anti-Trump FBI Special Agents and Lawyers who were
bent on stopping Donald Trump from becoming President
of the United States. Many of the same FBI agents
involved in the mishandeling of the Clinton E-Mail
.
471
Investigation were also responsible for the creation of the
FBI’s original Russia Investigation and the following
Special Counsel Investigation.
President Trump pointed to the political bias inside the
Mueller Investigation several times over the past week,
both directly and through surrogates.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended Rosenstein and
the Mueller witch hunt Monday night on Fox News’
Ingraham Angle.
During their discussion Laura asked the AWOL Attorney
General why he recused himself from the Trump-Russia
collusion witch hunt for talking to the ambassador at
cocktail parties but allows Rosenstein to oversee the witch
hunt after he signed the fraudulent FISA memo to spy on
Trump?
Here’s his answer:
Laura Ingraham: Attorney General
Sessions, just one more question. Are you
involved at all in discussions about a
possible recusal of Rod Rosenstein of
overseeing Mueller given the fact that he
did sign one of those FISA warrants and
that’s a big controversy in this case?
Jeff Sessions: I am not involved in that.
He is the acting Attorney General for that
matter and he has to make his own
decision as I had to make my decision.
 WAYNE ALLYN ROOT:
FBI=“FIRE BUREAU IMMEDIATELY”
By Assistant Editor
June 19, 2018, 12:48 Pm
The letters FBI should now stand for “FIRE BUREAU
IMMEDIATELY.”
There isn’t a shred of credibility left for the FBI. It’s now
clear the FBI leadership and their top agents/investigators
were involved in a vast criminal conspiracy to fix a
presidential election. These aren’t guesses or opinions.
These are facts gleaned from text messages sent by FBI
employees.
This is so scary. I’m a witness. I already had my own
personal experience with a powerful government agency
used by a president to destroy a political opponent. I know
the power and evil of government run amok. Obama’s IRS
tried to destroy me and bankrupt me under a blizzard of
debt by denying all of my 100% legal deductions and of
course, under a blizzard of legal bills, despite my
innocence.
If little ‘ole Wayne Root was a threat, just think of the
massive threat Donald Trump posed to Obama and Hillary.
If Trump was elected president he could investigate all of
the crimes of Obama and Hillary and send them and their
corrupt cabal to prison. So instead of a bunch of bean-
counter IRS agents, they sent the “big boys.” The
government-sanctioned hit squad, aka The FBI and DOJ.
This was the perfect conspiracy. The DOJ and FBI were
(before this conspiracy was exposed) the most respected
and credible law enforcement agencies in America. Who
was watching them? Who would investigate them? Who
would put them in prison for breaking the law?
Before I get to the findings and revelations, let me lay bare
the obscene argument put forth by DOJ Inspector General
Michael Horowitz. The general conclusion by IG Horowitz
(an Obama appointee) was these FBI agents were bad
472
guys. They did bad things. They were “insubordinate.” The
things they did were “extraordinary” and “dramatically
broke with FBI norms.” Those are the direct words of the
Inspector General. But he stopped short of calling any of it
“criminal.” He actually claimed these “extraordinary acts”
were not done out of “political bias.”
Hold on a minute, while I try to stop laughing.
Really? Let me destroy that myth right now. Let’s
substitute the words “Trump and Republican” with “black
and Obama.” If FBI employee’s texts talked of hatred for
black people…called black people “idiots, lazy, retarded,
deplorable” and how about this wonderful phrase- “POS”
(standing for pieces of excrement)…and then we found out
those same FBI employees were the ones investigating a
black president…
Would anyone, anywhere argue the personal opinions and
prejudices of the FBI investigators didn’t affect the
investigation of a black president? And it wasn’t “political
bias?” Don’t make me laugh.
If those same FBI employees investigating Obama were
caught on text saying, “I will stop Obama, I promise I will
not let him become president”… would anyone, anywhere
argue it wasn’t “political bias” and it didn’t affect the
investigation of Obama? Don’t make me laugh.
That’s exactly what’s been revealed here- except these FBI
agents didn’t hate black people. They hated Republicans.
What’s the difference? FBI agents with these biased,
extreme and hateful views can’t possibly be allowed to run
investigations.
Of course, it was a criminal conspiracy. Of course, they
were out to get Trump. Of course, their personal opinions
and prejudices affected the outcome of both the Hillary
email investigation and the Trump witch-hunt.
I may have been born yesterday, but I wasn’t born in the
past five minutes.
These agents hated Trump with a passion. They were
“Hillary Groupies.” One of the two FBI agents who
interviewed Hillary called her “the President.” The other
agent said “I’m with her.” Another bragged to his lover,
“we’ll stop Trump from becoming president.”
Agents called Trump voters “f—king idiots, retarded, sad,
pathetic, lazy, POS.” One DOJ official asked Hillary’s
campaign manager for a job for his son. Two of the FBI
agents investigating Hillary were having affairs with other
FBI employees. One of Mueller’s team was recently fired
for calling himself part of the “Trump Resistance.”
Are you kidding me?
.
473
The fix was in. And everyone involved should be fired,
lose their pensions and go to prison for a long time. This
was a conspiracy to fix a presidential election. This was a
coup against the president.
That’s why FBI should now stand for “FIRE BUREAU
IMMEDIATELY.”
 President Trump Hugs
American Flag After Speech,
Liberals Triggered
By Kristinn Taylor
June 19, 2018, 1:33 Pm

President Donald Trump hugged an American flag

following a speech he gave marking the 75th anniversary
of the National Federation of Independent Businesses at
their conference in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday.

CBS’ Mark Knoller reported without comment, “Pres ends

speech to @NFIB Conference and hugs flag.”

ABC’s Cecelia Vega snarked, “And then the president

hugged a flag. No really. The End.”

Former Hillary Clinton spokesman Jesse Ferguson was

triggered, “Donald Trump hates everything America stands
for and doesn’t believe in American values. When he
touches the flag, it desecrates it.”

A sample of the triggered liberal response to Vega’s video

clip:
474
 VICE News wasn’t happy, “Here’s Trump hugging the
flag for some reason”

Vice readers were also triggered:

475
President Trump’s speech:

476
 IG Horowitz Confirms He Is Investigating Whether
Strzok’s Anti-Trump Bias Impacted Launch
Of Russia Probe
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 1:58 Pm
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
revealed on Tuesday in a joint hearing
with the House Oversight and House
Judiciary Committees he is
investigating whether Peter Strzok’s
anti-Trump bias impacted the launch of
the Russia Probe.
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok
Fox News reported:
Justice Department Inspector General
Michael Horowitz confirmed Tuesday that
he is investigating whether FBI official
Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump bias factored into
the launch of the bureau’s Russia probe.
During a joint hearing before the House
Oversight and Judiciary committees,
Horowitz testified that his office was
reviewing Strzok’s anti-Trump text
messages as part of a separate probe
related to the Russia investigation.
“It clearly shows a biased state of mind,”
Horowitz said, referring to text messages
written as the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton’s
private email use was wrapping up and the
Russia probe was getting underway.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-
Va., questioned Horowitz on whether that apparent bias
influenced the initiation of the investigation into Russia
interference in the 2016 campaign and potential collusion
with Trump’s team.
477
“That’s a matter we’ve got under review
and are looking at right now,” Horowitz
said.
Of course Peter Strzok’s hatred for
Trump impacted the launch of the
Russia probe.
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter
Strzok sent his mistress Lisa Page a
text message saying “we’ll stop” Trump
from becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring
to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.
Other text exchanges reveal Strzok and Page had a ‘God
complex’ as if they were put in their positions at the FBI to
‘protect the country from that menace’ (Trump).
Lisa Page previously text Strzok:
“And maybe you’re meant to stay where
you are because you’re meant to protect
the country from that menace. PS – … I
can protect our country at many levels, not
sure if that helps”
Strzok wanted to stop Trump so desperately he made sure
Hillary Clinton did not get criminally referred for her
private server during the election because she would then winning the White House. No one expected Trump to win
have to be replaced with another Democrat candidate. so they extended the Russia probe by appointing a Special
Counsel to remove a duly elected President.
Of course his bias impacted the launch of the Russia probe.
It was the ‘insurance policy’ to prevent Trump from
.

478
 BREAKING: Horowitz Reveals Two More Anti-Trump
Lawyers May Have Been Removed From Mueller Witch
Hunt (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 2:41 Pm

Inspector General Michael Horowitz

revealed on Tuesday in a joint hearing
with the House Oversight and House
Judiciary Committees two more anti-
Trump FBI lawyers may have been
removed from Mueller’s witch hunt.

House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) asked

Inspector General Horowitz,
“Did you find any other FBI agents or FBI
attorneys who manifest any animus or bias
against President Trump?”
Horowitz replied in the affirmative,
BREAKING: IG Horowitz just testified that the two
unidentified biased FBI investigators (in addition to Stzok
and Page) assigned to the Mueller investigation are no
longer working for the special counsel, and at least one of
them was “removed” due to the anti-Trump text messages.

“We did. We found 3 additional FBI agents

as we detailed in the report.”

Gowdy then asked Horowitz if any of the 3 Trump-hating

FBI officials were working on the Russia probe or Mueller
witch hunt.

“I believe 2 of the 3 were but I would have

to double check on that,” replied Horowitz.

VIDEO: Horowitz referred five unnamed FBI employees for

investigation after more anti-Trump text messages
surfaced.

FBI employees were simply referred to as “FBI attorney

2,” or “FBI employee.”

479
 On Monday, a group of GOP lawmakers,
led by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) sent a
letter to Inspector General Horowitz
demanding he release the names of the
FBI employees named in the IG report.
People speculated as to why Horowitz redacted the names
of the FBI officials in his report.
Now we know it is most likely because we would find out
they were on Mueller’s team of liberal hacks.

Rep. Biggs brought up the Trump-hating ‘FBI attorney 2’ The Mueller witch hunt needs to be shut down
who messaged about ‘the resistance.‘ immediately and a Special Counsel needs to investigate
Mueller and Rosenstein.
‘”For example, one FBI attorney texted
“viva le resistance” when asked about his
commitment to the incoming Trump
administration in November 2016.”

480
 IG Horowitz: FBI Withholding Names Of Anti-Trump
Agents From Public
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 3:33 Pm

FBI employees were simply referred to as “FBI attorney

Inspector General Michael Horowitz 2,” or “FBI employee.” (example below)
revealed on Tuesday in a joint hearing
with the House Oversight and House
Judiciary Committees the FBI is
refusing to allow Trump-hating agents
to be named publicly.

Rep Ted Poe (R-TX) asked Inspector General Horowitz

about the unnamed, anti-Trump FBI officials in his review
on the bureau’s (mis)handling of the Hillary email On Monday, a group of GOP lawmakers,
investigation. led by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) sent a
letter to Inspector General Horowitz
Horowitz said the FBI is withholding the names from the demanding he release the names of the
public “because they work on counterintelligence.” FBI employees named in the IG report.

“So the FBI does not want their names
released?” Rep Ted Poe (R-TX) asked
Horowitz.
“Correct,” Horowitz replied.
Rep. Biggs brought up the Trump-hating ‘FBI attorney 2’
who messaged about ‘the resistance.‘
‘”For example, one FBI attorney texted
“viva le resistance” when asked about his
commitment to the incoming Trump
administration in November 2016.”
The Inspector General also revealed
Tuesday two more anti-Trump FBI
lawyers may have been removed from
Mueller’s witch hunt.

WE WANT NAMES!

Horowitz referred five unnamed FBI employees for

investigation after more anti-Trump text messages
surfaced.

481
 CBS Ignores FBI Getting Grilled
On Capitol Hill Over IG Report
By Kyle Drennen
June 19, 2018 3:59 PM EDT
Despite an avalanche of coverage of the Trump
administration’s immigration policy, both ABC and NBC
found time to offer full reports on FBI Director
Christopher Wray facing a tough grilling on Capitol Hill
on Monday over the Justice Department’s “scathing
inspector general’s report.” However, CBS was far too
engrossed visiting illegal immigrant detention centers
along the U.S. southern border to offer a single second to
the story.
“The FBI working overtime to do
damage control and contain the fallout
from that scathing inspector general’s
report, the FBI director facing a grilling
on Capitol Hill,”
NBC co-host Savannah Guthrie announced on Tuesday’s
Today show. Moments later, White House Correspondent
Kristen Welker added:
“The FBI director and the Justice
Department’s inspector general were in
the hot seat Monday, facing tough
questions about that 500-page report
which blasted former FBI Director
James Comey and senior FBI officials.”
The reporter noted Inspector General
Michael Horowitz “acknowledging the
conduct of one agent who was
discovered to have exchanged anti-
Trump text messages with a colleague
could have cast a shadow over the
inquiry.”
A clip ran of the government watchdog telling senators:
482
“We found the implication that senior
FBI employees would be willing to take
official action to impact a presidential
candidate’s electoral prospects to be
deeply troubling and antithetical to the
core values of the FBI and the Justice
Department.”
Wrapping up the segment, Welker explained that “more
fallout is still possible” as the inspector general next plans
to examine how memos from fired FBI Director James
Comey were handled and “who exactly leaked all of that
information to the press.”
Despite all of those obvious headlines, on Monday
evening, ABC’s World News Tonight focused its story
about the hearing entirely on discrediting the President.
“President Trump claims a report from the
Justice Department’s inspector general has
cleared him of any wrongdoing....But today,
the inspector general contradicting the
president, saying his report was focused on
the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation, not
Russia,” declared Justice Correspondent
Pierre Thomas.
The reporter then emphasized how Horowitz
“also rejects the President’s claim that the
report undermines the special counsel
probe.”
At no point was the inspector general’s condemnation of
anti-Trump FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page
mentioned.
On Friday, ABC’s Good Morning America similarly
skipped that aspect of the story.
At least ABC bothered to cover Monday’s hearing, unlike
CBS. Monday’s CBS Evening News and Tuesday’s CBS
This Morning both ignored the testimony.
Here is a full transcript of the June 19 report on NBC’s
Today show:
7:15 AM ET
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Lots more to get to this morning,
including the FBI working overtime to do damage control and
contain the fallout from that scathing inspector general’s report,
the FBI director facing a grilling on Capitol Hill. NBC White House
Correspondent Kristen Welker with the details on that this
morning. Kristen, good morning.
KRISTEN WELKER: Hi, Savannah, good morning to you. The
FBI director and the Justice Department’s inspector general were
in the hot seat Monday, facing tough questions about that 500-
page report which blasted former FBI Director James Comey and
senior FBI officials. The inspector general making it very clear his
work isn’t finished yet.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: FBI Won’t Repeat Errors; Director
Wray Responds to IG Report]
In the wake of that scathing report from the Justice Department’s
internal watchdog, FBI Director Christopher Wray says, moving
forward, the Bureau will not repeat the mistakes made during the
Clinton email investigation in 2016.
CHRISTOPHER WRAY: The OIG’s report makes clear that we
have significant work to do, and as I said, we’re going to learn
from the report and be better as a result.
WELKER: Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee
Monday, Wray and Inspector General Michael Horowitz
reiterated the report’s conclusion that there was no political bias
inside the FBI to tilt the election to Hillary Clinton or Donald
Trump. Still, Wray harshly criticized his predecessor, fired FBI
Director James Comey, for breaking protocol during the
investigation.
WRAY: I cannot imagine a situation in which I would unilaterally
assume for myself, as the FBI director, a charging decision, and
then announce it in a news conference.
WELKER: Horowitz acknowledging the conduct of one agent who
was discovered to have exchanged anti-Trump text messages
with a colleague could have cast a shadow over the inquiry.
483
MICHAEL HOROWITZ: We found the implication that senior FBI
employees would be willing to take official action to impact a
presidential candidate’s electoral prospects to be deeply troubling
and antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Justice
Department.
WELKER: Despite President Trump’s claim the report exonerates
him in the Russia investigation...
DONALD TRUMP: There was collusion, there was no
obstruction. The IG report yesterday went a long way to show
that.
WELKER: The inspector general says his report did not address
that.
HOROWITZ: We did not look into collusion questions.
WELKER: As the president continues to rail against the special
counsel’s investigation as a witch hunt, the FBI director
repeatedly expressing his confidence in Robert Mueller, as he
has in the past.
WRAY: I believe that Special Counsel Mueller is conducting an
important investigation. I do not believe that Special Counsel
Mueller is on a witch hunt.
WELKER: So the question now, where does this all go from
here? Well, the inspector general is reviewing how those Comey
memos were handled, so more fallout is still possible. And the
inspector general says there’s still another search underway for
who exactly leaked all of that information to the press. Horowitz
heads back to Capitol Hill today for yet another hearing.
Savannah and Hoda?
GUTHRIE: Kristen Welker at the White House. Thanks, Kristen.
Here is a full transcript of the June 18 report on ABC’s World
News Tonight:
6:40 PM ET
DAVID MUIR: Next this evening, to the FBI and the Justice
Department. The inspector general taking tough questions after
that scathing report on James Comey and what they called his
questionable moves going public involving Hillary Clinton, not
once, but twice, but then recommending no charges. She and
many of her supporters believe it cost her the election.
But today, the FBI director and the inspector general answering
questions on Capitol Hill after the president said the report
proves that the FBI was out to get him and to keep him from
becoming president. He said the report now exonerates him on
the Russia probe. So, what did they say about that? Here’s
ABC’s Chief Justice Correspondent Pierre Thomas tonight.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: FBI Under Fire; Inspector General
Defends Report; Wray Grilled]
PIERRE THOMAS: President Trump claims a report from the
Justice Department’s inspector general has cleared him of any
wrongdoing.
DONALD TRUMP: I think that the report yesterday, maybe more
importantly than anything, it totally exonerates me. There was no
collusion, there was no obstruction. And if you read the report,
you’ll see that.
THOMAS: But today, the inspector general contradicting the
president, saying his report was focused on the Hillary Clinton e-
mail investigation, not Russia.
MICHAEL HOROWITZ [INSPECTOR GENERAL]: We did not
look into collusion questions.
THOMAS: He also rejects the President’s claim that the report
undermines the special counsel probe.
.
484
TRUMP: I think that the Mueller investigation has been totally
discredited.
SEN. DICK DURBIN [D-MINORITY WHIP]: Did you address the
credibility of the investigation of Robert Mueller?
HOROWITZ: We did not address the credibility of the special
counsel’s investigation here.
THOMAS: The president has called the Russia investigation a
witch hunt. Today, his hand-picked FBI director again making
clear he does not agree.
CHRISTOPHER WRAY [FBI DIRECTOR]: And as I said before, I
do not believe Special Counsel Mueller is on a witch hunt.
THOMAS: Wray also agreed with the inspector general that
political bias did not effect the outcome of the Clinton
investigation. But tonight, Republicans aren't buying it.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM [R-SC]: These people hated Trump
and this investigation was anything but by the book.
 Trump-Hating Special Agent
Peter Strzok Escorted Out Of FBI Building
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 4:02 Pm
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter
Strzok was escorted out of the FBI
building on Friday but he is still
employed in Human Resources.
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok
CNN reporter, Laura Jarrett reported Strzok was escorted
from the FBI building Friday, however he is still
employed.
Can someone please ask Inspector General Horowitz or
FBI Director Wray why this corrupt man is still employed?
Jarrett tweeted: News – FBI special agent Peter Strzok
was escorted out of the FBI building on Friday, source
familiar tells me; as of today, he is still employed; he’s
been stationed in Human Resources since dismissal from
Mueller team.
According to the Washington Examiner, Aitan Goelman,
Mr. Strzok’s lawyer, confirmed in a statement that his
client “was escorted from the building as part of the
ongoing examination process.”
485
The Hill has more on the statement from Strzok’s lawyer:
“Pete has steadfastly played by the rules
and respected the process, and yet he
continues to be the target of unfounded
personal attacks, political games and
inappropriate information leaks….All of this
seriously calls into question the impartiality
of the disciplinary process, which now
appears tainted by political influence.
Instead of publicly calling for a long-serving
FBI agent to be summarily fired, politicians
should allow the disciplinary process to
play out free from political pressure.”
Peter Strzok was removed from the Mueller witch hunt
after anti-Trump text messages were discovered by
Inspector General Horowitz over the summer of 2017.
Recently Strzok came under fire for what many believe to
be the most damning text message yet.
Trump-hating FBI Special Agent Peter
Strzok sent his mistress Lisa Page a
text message saying “we’ll stop” Trump
from becoming President.
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
 there’s no way [Trump] gets Inspector General Michael Horowitz
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take revealed on Tuesday in a joint hearing
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page with the House Oversight and House
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring Judiciary Committees he is
to Andrew McCabe. investigating whether Peter Strzok’s
anti-Trump bias impacted the launch of
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” the Russia Probe.
Strzok added.
Why the hell is Strzok still employed??
Other text exchanges reveal Strzok and Page had a ‘God
complex’ as if they were put in their positions at the FBI to
‘protect the country from that menace’ (Trump).

486
 This Is CNN? Smerconish Changes
Mind on Video Trump Gave to Kim Jong-un
By P.J. Gladnick
June 19, 2018 4:03 PM EDT
Remember how many members of the mainstream media
derided the video that President Donald Trump gave to
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un? They wrote it off as
something like a mere elevator pitch video for selling
timeshares. Well, that was the first impression of CNN
host Michael Smerconish...until he watched it a second
time and came to realize that it could be a very effective
video.
On Saturday he interviewed a former U.S. diplomat and
psychiatrist who agreed that it was indeed a very effective
video.
MICHAEL SMERCONISH: For me, the lingering
question about the Singapore summit had nothing to do
with did Trump give up too much or what are the details or
what's the timeline. No, no, no. I'm interested in that four-
minute video that the president showed Kim on an iPad,
showing what North Korea can be if it will allow itself to
be integrated into the world community.
In some quarters, the White House is
being derided for use of that video as if
it's an elevator pitch. You know, Trump
trying to sell Kim a timeshare in Phoenix
or some such thing. And that was my
first reaction, too. But when I looked at
it a second time, what stood out to me
was the basketball dunk. In the midst of
all of this footage showing progress in
North Korea, trains and buildings and
medical advance comes the dunk of a
basketball.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
.
487
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: A story about a special moment
in time when a man is presented with one chance that may
never be repeated.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
SMERCONISH: That's when I said to myself, is this the
equivalent of when we went to the drive-in in the '70s and
the image of a hot dog would go sailing by and suddenly
you felt hungry?
In other words, is it possible that this was
not some slap dash production, but
rather was the result of thought and
deliberation as to how do we reach --
based on some psychological profile,
how do we reach Chairman Kim?
Is it more sophisticated than we might have thought at
first blush? Joining me now is Dr. Ken Dekleva. He's a
former U.S. diplomat and psychiatrist who used to work
with the State Department. He's profiled various world
leaders, including Kim. Dr. Dekleva, on a propaganda
scale, how many stars out of five?
KENNETH DEKLEVA, PSYCHIATRIST: Good
morning, Michael. I give it 4.5.
SMERCONISH: And why 4.5?
DEKLEVA: I agree with -- with what you
were saying in your introduction, that the
video is remarkably sophisticated, and I
think it was carefully and thoughtfully
designed to appeal not only to
Chairman Kim but also to other
members of the North -- North Korean
elite. And also in an indirect way, to the
people of South Korea and President
Moon. I thought it rich with symbolism,
powerful emotions and marvelously put
together.
So rather than mere elevator pitch, a psychiatrist with a
diplomatic background agrees that it is "remarkably
sophisticated" and designed to appeal not only to Kim but
also to other members of the North Korean elite. Oh, and
"marvelously put together."
This is CNN?
 BREAKING: Rep Mark Meadows Unmasks Two
Unidentified Trump-Hating FBI Officials Referred For
Investigation (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 4:32 Pm

BREAKING NEWS.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark

Meadows unmasked two of the
previously unidentified, anti-Trump, pro-
Hillary FBI investigators referred for
investigation by the Inspector General.
These FBI attorneys do not work in
“counterintelligence” as the FBI
previously claimed as an excuse to
withhold their names from the public.

Paul Sperry reported: Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) just

outed 2 of the unidentified anti-Trump, pro-Hillary FBI
investigators referred for punishment by IG & both work
for the general counsel of FBI, not in “counterintelligence”
as the FBI claimed as an excuse to w/hold their names

Rep. Mark Meadows unmasked two of the unidentified

FBI officials in the IG report.

The unnamed FBI officials “Agent 1”

and “Agent 5” were involved in the FBI
Clinton investigation and were also
engaged in a romantic relationship just
like fellow FBI lovebirds Strzok and
Page.
One of the FBI lawyers is Sally Moyer,
the other is Kevin Clinesmith.

VIDEO: Sperry: House Judiciary member Rep. Mark Meadows (R-

NC) unmasked the ID of anti-Trump, pro-Hillary FBI
investigators referred for punishment by IG. One is
SALLY MOYER who allegedly was having a romantic
relationship with a male FBI attorney, mirroring Page &
Strzok

488
 *** BREAKING NEWS ***
House Judiciary member Rep. Mark
Meadows (R-NC) unmasked the ID of anti-
Trump, pro-Hillary FBI investigators
referred for punishment by IG. One is
SALLY MOYER who allegedly was having
a romantic relationship with a male FBI
attorney, mirroring Page & Strzok
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) June 19,
2018
Inspector General Michael Horowitz
revealed on Tuesday in a joint hearing
with the House Oversight and House
Judiciary Committees the FBI is
refusing to allow Trump-hating agents
to be named publicly.
Horowitz said the FBI is withholding the names from the
public “because they work on counterintelligence.”
“So the FBI does not want their names released?” Rep Ted
Poe (R-TX) asked Horowitz.
“Correct,” Horowitz replied.
Horowitz referred five unnamed FBI employees for
investigation after more anti-Trump text messages
surfaced.
FBI employees were simply referred to as “FBI attorney
2,” or “FBI employee.”
More stonewalling and lies from the FBI!

Rep Ted Poe (R-TX) asked Inspector General Horowitz This is a breaking story…please refresh page for updates.
about the unnamed, anti-Trump FBI officials in his review
on the bureau’s (mis)handling of the Hillary email
investigation.

489
 AUDIO: Congressional Intern Screams
‘F*** You!’ At President Trump At Capitol
By Kristinn Taylor
June 19, 2018, 6:56 Pm

A female Congressional intern screamed,

“Mr. President, f*** you!”,

as President Donald Trump walked through the Capitol to

a meeting with House Republicans on immigration.

Video that captured the profane protest was captured by

Fox News’ Chad Pergram, “Congressional aide or intern
yells “Mr President, f*%k you!” from across the Capitol
Rotunda as he walks to the Speaker’s office before mtg
with House GOPers on immigration. Gets attention of
USCP/Secret Service”… NBC’s Frank Thorpe also recorded the scream,

”The woman who heckled the President
most likely had to either be an intern or
aide. Someone with a hard Congressional
pass allowing access to the Rotunda area
after hours. The Capitol closes to public
tours ar 4:30 pm et.”
“LISTEN: As Pres Trump’s entourage
entered Speaker Ryan’s office in the
Capitol, someone on the other side of the
Capitol rotunda yelled: “Mr. President, F—k
you!!” (He entered about 15 seconds
later):”…”Per our intern, who was standing
there, the woman who yelled “Mr.
President, F–k you!!” was a congressional
intern.”

490
 The Daily Mail’s David Martosko posted a tongue-in-
cheek poll on the fate of the foul-mouthed anti-Trump
intern.

Last October a protester hid among reporters at the Capitol

and threw Russian flags at Trump as he walked to a
meeting with Senate Republicans.

491
 Rosenstein Hid Damning Strzok Text Message “We’ll
Stop” Trump From Becoming President From
Congressional Investigators For A Month (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 7:05 Pm
On Tuesday, Inspector General Michael
Horowitz testified in a joint
Congressional hearing to the House
Oversight and House Judiciary panels
about his review of the FBI’s
(mis)handling of the Clinton email
investigation.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) grilled Horowitz over why the
damning Strzok text message dated August 8th, 2016
stating “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming president was
missing from earlier production.
Horowitz told Jordan he gave the damning text message to
the office of the Deputy Attorney General a month ago
which only further infuriated the GOP lawmaker.
God Bless Rep. Jim Jordan.
Horowitz admitted to Rep. Jordan he discovered the
damning “we’ll stop Trump” text message from Peter
Strzok in May.
Rep. Jordan wanted to know who made the decision to
withhold this damning text message from Congressional
investigators for a month.
“But who made the decision? Was it Mr.
Wray, was it Mr. Rosenstein, Mr.
Sessions? Who made the decision?”
Jordan asked Horowitz.
“We sent it to the Office of Deputy Attorney
General,” Horowitz said.
492
“So, Mr. Rosenstein. Rosenstein made a
decision that instead of us seeing the most
explosive text message between these two
key agents that were on the Clinton team,
the Russia team, and on the Special
Counsel team, he made a decision to wait
a month for us to see that text message,”
Rep Jordan said.
Rep. Jordan went on to say this isn’t the first time
Rosenstein has kept information from Congress; he has a
pattern of secrecy and stonewalling.
VIDEO:
Last Thursday we found out Trump-
hating FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok
sent his mistress Lisa Page a text
message saying “we’ll stop” Trump
from becoming President
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
 in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring Rosenstein must be impeached and investigated
to Andrew McCabe. immediately.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.

493
 Chairman Bob Goodlatte Fires Warning Shot To Peter
Strzok ‘A Subpoena Is Coming’ (VIDEO)
By Cristina Laila
June 19, 2018, 8:24 Pm

House Judiciary Chairman Bob

Goodlatte (R-VA) and House Oversight
Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) appeared
on Fox News Tuesday evening to
discuss the Congressional hearing with
IG Horowitz.
Chairman Goodlatte revealed a
subpoena has been prepared for Peter
Strzok and is on the way.

Peter Strzok was escorted out of the FBI building on

Friday, however; he is still employed in Human Resources.

Last Thursday we found out Trump-

“We want to have him [Strzok] before the
Committee. He has now indicated that he
would come voluntarily. He has not pinned
himself down on when so we are
imminently going to issue a subpoena to
him to appear next week,” Goodlatte said.
“So a subpoena has been prepared but not
been issued yet?” asked Fox News’ Sandra
Smith.
“If [Peter Strzok is] going to appear
voluntarily, his lawyer better contact us
right away, because a subpoena is
coming.”
VIDEO:
hating FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok
sent his mistress Lisa Page a text
message saying “we’ll stop” Trump
from becoming President
This text message from Strzok was sent to Page 9 days
after “Crossfire Hurricane” was opened and 6 days before
the “insurance policy” text.
In another damning text exchange between the FBI
lovebirds 6 days after Strzok said he’ll “stop” Trump from
becoming President, was a discussion about an “insurance
policy” to keep Donald Trump out of office.
“I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office…that
there’s no way [Trump] gets
elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take
that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page
in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring
to Andrew McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40,”
Strzok added.

494
 Rush Limbaugh: Drive-By Media Bombarding Americans
With ‘Manufactured Crises’ To Distract From IG Report,
Robust Economy (VIDEO)
By Alicia Powe
June 19, 2018, 9:40 Pm
The liberal media has been manufacturing crises ad-
infinitum to divert the public’s attention away from the
Trump administration’s tremendous achievements and the
Democratic establishment’s corruption, conservative radio
talk show host Rush Limbaugh warns.
While Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s damning
report proves the FBI colluded with the Hillary campaign
to exonerate her in the email investigation, Democrats are
bombarding Americans with fabricated propaganda about
Trump’s “heartless” immigration policy, which consists of
the president enforcing the already established laws,
Limbaugh explained Tuesday.
“We are smack dab in the middle of
another manufactured media crisis about
the supposed ‘Donald Trump, that
purposely, wontedly, separates young
families who are simply seeking a better life
by crossing the border of the United States
illegally,” he said. “Trump is the first
president, in I don’t know how long, actually
enforcing the law. That’s what has
everybody so shocked. If you really want to
do the humane thing, you stop them from
coming, you tell them not to come and
when they arrive you turn them away.”
Pro-amnesty Democrats, who are adamantly against
building a wall along the US, Mexico border do not
sincerely care about the welfare of unaccompanied illegal
children or they would support legislation that secures the
495
border and disincentives immigrants from entering the
United States illegally, Limbaugh argued.
“If your heart is breaking and if it’s gut-
wrenching — this whole idea of separating
families — then what you must support is
the denial of entry illegally into the country
and the deportation. That’s the solution to
the problem, don’t come, don’t show up
and try to get into the country illegally right
now because the president, his
administration have made it plain, they are
going to enforce the law.”
“The reason why all of this is happening is
because these people are attempting to get
in the country illegally,” he continued. “If
you want to end the problem, if that is really
what the objective is – It isn’t by the way,
all of these people wringing their hands and
crying about separated families, they don’t
care about that. That’s not what this is
about. Because if it were there’s a simple
way to stop it. Stop trying to get into the
country illegally, knowingly.”
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen explained
during the the White House briefing Monday that the vast
majority children who are presently in the care of HHS,
10,000 of the 12,000, were sent here alone by their parents.
The United States government is not separating children
from their families, Limbaugh noted, their parents are.
“All of these unaccompanied minors – their
parents force them out of the house in
 Guatamala, El Savador wherever, put them
on the trains, put them on the bus and send
them unaccompanied to the United States
on a journey where they could be severely
injured or killed. Nobody is separating
these people in the United States, their
own parents are separating themselves
from their kids when they put them on this
train, when they put them on the flatbeds,
when the put them on the buses, or the
mule backs or whatever else they are using
to get them in.”
But Democrats and their accomplices in the media don’t
care about the truth or the children because they are
“manufacturing a crisis out of something that has been
going on for years” to vilify Trump, distract from the IG
report and the booming economy Trump has fostered,
Limbaugh argued.
“Remember it used to be Stormy Daniels.
The drive-bys were totally devoted to a
porn star. They were converting a porn star
into a credible spokeswoman against
.
496
Donald Trump — where is that mouth trap
lawyer of hers, Avenatti– done and been
there, used up, spit out and moved on,” he
said. ‘Remember, before that it was David
‘camera’ Hogg and the students at the
school in Florida and they occupied a crisis
involving guns, for how many weeks did
that go on? At various stages it has been
the Russian Trump collusion story. It’s just
one manufactured crisis after another.”
“One of the reasons that this exists is to
take the IG report off the table. To provide
mechanisms whereby they don’t have to
report on the great and robust economic
news, or anything else positive regarding
the Trump administration,” he continued.
“They lost, they’re the losers in the last
election. Their voters and their side
represents a minority of thinking. And yet
they get away with going on offense with
this never ending accusatory journalism
against us, Trump. Thank God for Donald
Trump, not backing down at all. In fact, he
is doubling down.”
497