Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Note On The Hungarian Sabers of Mediev PDF
A Note On The Hungarian Sabers of Mediev PDF
MEDIEVAL BULGARIA
Valeri Iotov
Ever since the late nineteenth century, a group of sabers have been singled
out, which have been found in late ninth- or tenth-century assemblages
attributed to the Hungarians of the “conquest age” (honfoglaló). These
long sabers of between 750 and 950 mm have therefore been dubbed
“Hungarian”, mainly because they shared a number of peculiar charac-
teristics, such as hilts set at a sharp angle to the blade and equipped
with a pear-shaped head; hand guard bars flanked by spherical, bead-
like ornaments bent towards the blade; slightly curved blades; and edge
extensions in the lower third of the saber, where the single-edged blade
becomes double-edged (elman).1
The idea that such sabers were typically Hungarians and used only by
Hungarians has been seriously challenged in the 1950s and 1960s espe-
cially by Soviet archaeologists.2 Nikolai Merpert summarized the criti-
cism by categorically rejecting the idea of a single place of origin for the
“Hungarian sabers” and of a single tribe having a long-term monopoly
over such weapons.3 Irrespective of the ethnic attribution, the so-called
“Hungarian saber” is nevertheless a distinct weapon, which appears with
a great degree of consistency in mid- to late ninth-century burial assem-
blages in the steppe lands north of the Black and Caspian seas, as well as
in the Carpathian Basin from the late ninth to the mid-tenth century. On
the basis of their respective distributions, Mechthild Schulze-Dörrlamm
distinguished two main types of “Hungarian sabers”: the Koban type,
and the saber without scabbard with lavish gold or silver decoration.4
Best known among specimens of Schulze-Dörrlamm’s first type are the
1
Tóth 1934, Arendt 1934, and Fettich 1937.
2
Korzukhina 1950; Merpert 1955; Kirpichnikov 1966, 68–72.
3
Merpert 1955, 166. To be sure, Merpert dealt in his study with two chronologically
different types of sabers found on the territory of the Soviet Union.
4
Schulze 1984, 477 and 506 fig. 5; Schulze-Dörrlamm 1988, 460–62 and fig. 19.
For the Koban type, see Schulze-Dörrlamm 1988, 393–98 and 459–60 with fig. 19. For
sabers without scabbards with gold or silver decoration, see Schulze-Dörrlamm 1988,
394–401 and fig. 22.
328 valeri iotov
5
For the “Charlemagne saber”, see Hampel 1897–1899; Tóth 1934; Kirpichnikov
1965. For the Gesztered saber, see Fettich 1937, pl. 68; Dienes 1972, fig. 4. For the Karos
sabers, see Révész 1996, pl. 73/2, 82, 122.
6
Stancho and Ivanov 1958, 9 and 103 with pl. 27.1; Shkorpil 1905, 506 and pl. 113.
7
Iotov 1992.
8
Iotov 1993.
a note on the “hungarian sabers” of medieval bulgaria 329
Another saber was found in the environs of the village of Iarebitsa, in the
district of Dulovo (Fig. 2).9 Almost identical to the Debrene saber, the
Iarebitsa specimen is nevertheless a little longer (920 mm). Much of
the original saber is well preserved: blade, pommel, ferrules with wire
spools holding together the grip, hilt guard. The latter has shoulders
curved downwards with a pyramid-shaped knob in the middle. A langet
overlies the base of the blade, next to the crossbar, leaving room for the
mouth of the scabbard to slip in-between. Very prominent is the elman,
a sharp transition between single- and double-edged blade. The saber
9
Kănev 2002, 120 with fig. 3.
330 valeri iotov
10
Changova 1969, 222 with fig. 1.23; Bonev 1993, 75 with fig. 13a; Lisitsov 1977, 23.
11
Kurnatowska 1973, 89 and fig. 1.5, 6; Doncheva-Petkova 1999, 742–43.
12
Atanasov 2000, 201 and pl. 12.43.
a note on the “hungarian sabers” of medieval bulgaria 331
History (Figs. 3.11 and 4).13 An attachment appliqué from Silistra (Fig.
5) and a copper-alloy, laminated piece from Tsar Asen in the district
of Silistra may have also belonged to “Hungarian sabers.”14 For the for-
mer, Stanislav Stanilov points to many analogies in assemblages found
in Hungary, especially a pair of appliqués for the equally ”Hungarian”
saber from Gesztered.15 The laminated piece from Tsar Asen (Fig. 6) has
been interpreted as part of the pommel, but on the basis of two analo-
gies from grave 10 and 15 oft he Martan Chu cemetery in the northern
Caucasus region, I suggest instead that such mounts served to bind the
scabbard mouthpiece for “Hungarian sabers” of the Koban type.16
Another saber was found on the early medieval hillfort site at Popina,
in the district of Silistra (Fig. 7).17 Two other sabers, now in the Archae-
ological Museum of Varna, have been found in northeastern Bulgaria
(Figs. 8–9).18 All three sabers are very similar to, and almost of the same
size as the Debrene and Iarebitsa specimens. Moreover, the guard of the
Popina saber is similar to that of the Iarebitsa saber (Fig. 2). Several
other guards, now in the Archaeological Museum in Varna, are said to
have been found in northeastern Bulgaria (Fig. 10).19 All three have very
good analogies among sabers found in assemblages attributed to Hun-
garian warriors at the time of their first major raids into Central and
Western Europe. Most prominent amont such analogies are the copper-
alloy guards studied by Mechthild Schulze-Dörrlamm.20 Finally two box
appliqués from the same region of northeastern Bulgaria display a gilded
palmetto decoration (Fig. 11), almost identical to that of belt mounts for
saber attachments found in a tenth-century burial in Tiszavasvári.21
All these analogies for either whole sabers or their components point
to a rather homogeneous group of weapons justifying the name bestowed
upon them. Their chronology strongly suggests an association between
13
Kănev 2002.
14
Stanilov 1999, 36–37.
15
See Korzukhina 1950, fig. 8; Dienes 1972, 74 with fig. 4.
16
Vinogradov 1983, figs. 3.4 and 7.7.
17
Unpublished. Now in the Historical Museum of Dobrich (A-s 1305).
18
Unpublished. Now in the Archaeological Museum of Varna, inv. IV 5052 and
5686.
19
Unpublished. Now in the Archaeological Museum of Varna, inv. 4901–4902, 4958,
and 4968.
20
Schulze 1984, 487 with fig. 11.7, 14. See also Bakay, 1966, 48 with fig. 2; Dąbrowska
1979, 348 fig. 5; Bálint 1980, 241 fig. 2; Dienes 1972, 185–88 with figs. 4–5.
21
Unpublished. Now in the Archaeological Museum of Varna, inv. IV 4938 and IV
5000. For Tiszavasvári, see Dienes 1996, 188 fig. 8.
334 valeri iotov
such weapons and the Hungarian raids into Bulgaria during the first
regnal years of Symeon (895–912) or with their expedition against Byz-
antium during the tenth century.22 However, the large number of finds
so far known, which can only be compared to those of Hungary, points
to a widespread use of the “Hungarian sabers” in contemporary warfare.
In that respect, such weapons indicate warfare tactics similar to those
of the Hungarian nomads, not necessarily the presence of the Hungar-
ians themselves. Whether they were adopted from the Hungarians or
not, the “Hungarian sabers” quickly became a favorite weapon of tenth-
century warriors in Southeastern Europe.
22
Dimitrov 1998, 29–37; Curta 2006, 188–89.
a note on the “hungarian sabers” of medieval bulgaria 337
References
Arendt, W. 1934, “Türkische Säbel aus dem VIII.–IX. Jahrhunderten”. In Studia Levedica.
Archäologischer Beitrag zur Geschichte der Altungarn im IX. Jh., eds A. A. Zakharov
and V. V. Arendt, Budapest, 48–68.
Atanasov, G. 2000, “Klady zemledel‘cheski orudii iz Iuzhnoi Dobrudzhi (X-nachalo XI
vv.)”, Stratum+ 5, 182–208.
Bakay, K. 1965, “Gräberfelder aus den 10.–11. Jahrhunderten in der Umgebung von
Székesfehérvár und die Frage der frürstlichen Residenz. Archäologische Studien zu
der Frage der ungarischen Staatsgründung II”, Alba Regia 6–7, 43–88.
Bálint, Cs. 1980, “Der landnahmezeitliche Grabfund von Pestlőrinc”, Acta Archaeologica
Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 32, 241–50.
Bonev, S. 1993, “Arkhitekturen kompleks v Preslav”, Preslav. Sbornik 4, 56–78.
Changova, I. 1969, “Grăzhdanska postroika v mestnostta ‘Selishte’ v Preslav”, Izvestiia na
Arkheologicheskiia Institut 31, 211–30.
Curta, F. 2006, Southestern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge.
Dąbrowska, E. 1979, “Elements hongrois dans les trouvailles archéologiques au nord des
Carpathes”, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 341–56.
Dienes, I. 1972. Die Ungarn um die Zeit der Landnahme. Budapest.
——. 1996, “Honfoglalás kori kovácsaink egyik mesterfogásáról”, Folia Archaeologica 45,
181–200.
Dimitrov, Kh. 1998, Bălgaro-ungarskite otnosheniia prez srednovekovieto. Sofia.
Doncheva-Petkova, L. 1999, Odărtsi. Selishte ot Părvoto bălgarsko tsarstvo, I, Sofia.
Fettich, N. 1937, A honfoglaló magyarság fémművessége, Budapest.
Hampel, J. 1897–1899, “Der sogenannte Säbel Karls des Grossen”, Zeitschrift für histo-
rische Waffenkunde 1, no. 2, 45–49.
Iotov, V. 1992, “Sabia ot rannosrednovekovnoto selishte pri s. Debrene, Dobrichko”,
Dobrudzha 9, 141–45.
——. 1993, “Nakhodka ot remăchni ot rannosrednovekovnoto selishte pri s. Debrene,
Dobrichko”, Dobrudzha 10, 123–30.
Kănev, I. 2002, “Novopostăpila rannosrednovekovna sabia văv fondovete na Natisional-
niia istoricheski muzei”, Acta Musei Varnensis 1, 118–25.
Kirpichnikov, A. N. 1965, “Tak nazyvaemaia sablia Karla Velikogo”, Sovetskaia arkhe-
ologiia no. 2, 268–76.
——. 1966. Drevnerusskoe oruzhie. Mechi i sabli IX–XIII vv. Leningrad.
Korzukhina, G. F. 1950, “Iz istorii drevnerusskogo oruzhiia XI veka”, Sovetskaia arkhe-
ologiia 13, 63–74.
Kurnatowska, Z. “Elementy uzbrojenia i oporzadzenia jezdzieckiego z wczesnośred-
niowiecznego grodziska w Styrmen w Bulgarii”, Slavia antiqua 20, 87–124.
Lisitsov, S. 1977, “Raskopki na IKS ot vătreshniia grad na Veliki Preslav”, Godishnik na
Natsionalnia politekhnicheski muzei 7, 12–30.
Merpert, N. Ia. 1955, “Iz istorii oruzhiia plemen Vostochnoi Evropy v rannem
srednevekov’e”, Sovetskaia arkheologiia 23, 131–68.
Révész, L. 1996, A karosi honfoglalás kori temetők. Régészeti adatok a Felsö-Tisza-vidék
X. századi történetéhez, Miskolc.
Schulze, M. 1984, “Das ungarische Kriegergrab von Aspres-les-Corps. Untersuchungen
zu den Ungarneinfällen nach Mittel-, West- und Südeuropa (899–955 n.Chr.) mit
einem Exkurs: Zur Münzchronologie altungarischer Gräber”, Jarbuch des Rümisch-
Germanischen Museums in Mainz 31, 473–514.
Schulze-Dörrlamm, M. 1988, “Untersuchungen zur Herkunft der Ungarn und zum
Beginn ihrer Landnahme im Karpatenbecken”, Jarbuch des Rümisch-Germanischen
Museums in Mainz 35, 373–478.
338 valeri iotov
Illustrations
Figures
1. Debrene, “Hungarian saber.” Photo by author. Courtesy of the Historical Museum
in Dobrich.
2. Iarebitsa, “Hungarian saber.” Photo by author. Courtesy of the Historical Museum
in Dobrich.
3. “Hungarian saber” crossbar guards from Bulgaria: 3–5—Preslav; 6–7—Stărmen;
8–9—Odărtsi; 10—Ruino; 11—northeastern Bulgaria. Drawings by author.
4. Unknown location in northeastern Bulgaria, “Hungarian saber” crossbar guard.
Photo by author. Courtesy of the Archaeological Museum in Varna.
5. Silistra, “Hungarian saber” attachment appliqué. Photo by author.
6. Tsar Asen, “Hungarian saber” scabbard mouthpiece mount. Photo by author.
7. Popina, “Hungarian saber.” Photo by author. Courtesy of the Historical Museum in
Dobrich.
8. Unknown location in northeastern Bulgaria, “Hungarian saber.” Photo by author.
Courtesy of the Archaeological Museum in Varna.
9. Unknown location in northeastern Bulgaria, “Hungarian saber.” Photo by author.
Courtesy of the Archaeological Museum in Varna.
10. Unknown locations in northeastern Bulgaria, “Hungarian saber” crossbar guards.
Photo by author. Courtesy of the Archaeological Museum in Varna.
11. Unknown location in northeastern Bulgaria, “Hungarian saber” box appliqué.
Photo by author. Courtesy of the Archaeological Museum in Varna.