Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Francis Fukuyama’s
By
Ian Jackson
with
Jason Xidias
WAYS IN TO THE TEXT
Key Points
Fukuyama has published a string of important books but his most bold and
controversial remains 1992’s The End of History and the Last Man.
What Does The End of History And The Last Man Say?
Francis Fukuyama’s grand theory for explaining the post-Cold War* world is
that history has a plot, and that its inevitable happy ending is liberal
democracy.* He argues that human history is divided up into periods, with
each one an improvement on the last. The ultimate destination for everyone is
Western-style democracy because that is the best system for satisfying the
human need for recognition and equality. When all nations become capitalist
democracies, he says, it will mark the end of history.
Fukuyama wrote his landmark book in the immediate aftermath of the Cold
War between America and the Soviet Union. The End of History was
published in 1992, the same year that the Berlin Wall*—the most potent
symbol of the East-West divide—was finally demolished. It was also the year
after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which ended the global standoff
between the two superpowers that had lasted since World War II.
Fukuyama argues that the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 proves that
liberal democracy and capitalism—an economic system that emphasizes the
private ownership of goods—are the best political and economic systems,
with the fewest flaws. In The End of History he claims that this “triumph of
Western liberalism”*—the political philosophy that emphasizes freedom,
equality and regularly contested elections—represents a historical endpoint, a
final stage that will replace war with lasting, universal peace.
He is not specific about the timeframe for this process. He also acknowledges
that some countries face serious obstacles in changing how they operate. But
Fukuyama’s fundamental argument is that all human societies evolve in the
same way, and that human history everywhere leads to liberal democracy.
Why Does The End of History and the Last Man Matter?
Fukuyama’s controversial argument was made at a time of huge uncertainty
around the world over the future of international relations. The decades-long
Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union had ended in 1991.
The break-up of the Soviet Union left the United States as the last superpower
standing, and seemingly the most dominant nation on the planet. Scholars
such as Fukuyama and his contemporaries in American universities were
attempting to come to terms with this immense change in the balance of world
power—and to make difficult predictions about its implications for the future.
From the outset, The End of History met with substantial criticism. Fukuyama
drew reactions from all parts of the political spectrum and was challenged
immediately by equally bold, contrasting viewpoints. The most notable came
in The Clash of Civilizations written by Fukuyama’s former teacher at Harvard,
the American political philosopher Samuel Huntington.* For Huntington, the
deciding factor in world politics would increasingly boil down to cultural
differences. Fukuyama and Huntington were often presented by the media as
heading rival “camps,” each offering a very different vision of what the future
held in store for America and the world.
The End of History and the Last Man remains an important reference point
because it had an impact on American and European foreign policy. It is
generally agreed that key events since publication undermine the book’s core
argument (especially the rise of China, which is opposed to liberalism, and the
2008 global financial crisis*). But Fukuyama’s outlook remains an inspiration
for many politicians. Critics would welcome an updated grand theory in which
Fukuyama explains how the reality of the last two decades—including the
relative decline of American power, enduring human conflict, and the inability
or refusal of some states to implement democratic reforms—fits into
humankind’s journey to the end of history.