Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Cycle-Task - Task 2
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Cycle-Task - Task 2
Type of Number of
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☐ 4
activity: weeks
Evaluation Intermediate,
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
moment: Unit 2
Total score of the activity: Environment to submit the activity:
110 Monitoring and evaluation environment.
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity: October 28th
October 2th 2018 2018
Competencies to develop:
Critical thinking
Topics to develop:
Contents Unit 2: Teaching Math to Young Children 1
1. Read the document “Teaching Math to Young Children”, (until page 56)
found in the Course Contents, UNIT 2, in the Knowledge Environment.
2. Based on the text, you need to post the answer to the following
questions:
What does it mean to teach something in a developmental progress?
What does it mean to monitor something progressively?
What does it mean that math instruction is built on what children know
What does it mean to see the word mathematically?
How could the different knowledge areas include math in their
curriculums?
It is mandatory to give examples in each one of the questions in order to
better explain and understand the topics.
3. Check your partners’ posts and make comments about them in order to
support their ideas.
Individual:
When you finally have corrected your works according to the
feedback given in the forum, each student uploads the work
in a single document (pdf or word) to the link Cycle-task:
task 2, found in the Evaluation Environment.
Products to
Collaborative:
be submitted
The participation in the forum will be scored in terms of
by students
interaction with the mates; the more you give relevant
feedback to your mates, the most you learn and have a
good punctuation.
3. General guidelines for the collaborative work
Steps that make up the development of collaborative work by
students:
• First step: recognition of actors as subjects.
At the beginning of the course, in the space designated for it, the
students will be recognized as participants of a collaborative
group; they will be able to present their strengths at the service
of the group and will define the communication channels (contact
data, institutional and personal email address, skype , links of
social networks.) of which they will have to interact effectively
and proactively.
• Second step: planning of academic activities.
In accordance with the elements that make up the principle of
responsible action, students can design a work plan based on the
analytical reflection of the agenda of activities, the evaluation
plan, the guides and rubrics submitted for the development of
each academic activity.
Planning of They will design a proposal for the planning of their collaborative
activities for work, for which they can take as an input the guide presented in
the table 1 that responds to the particularities and needs of the
development learning strategy that mobilizes the work that is going to be
developed.
of
Regarding the definition of roles, it is important that these can be
collaborative
determined based on the proposal made by the course directors
work and the teacher network, in order to make the collaborative
space enriched from the dialogue of knowledge and the academic
debate
• Third step: staging the principles of collaborative work.
It is important that students internalize each of the principles of
collaborative work and put them into practice from the beginning
of the academic year and thereby ensure excellence in their
learning processes and the presentation of scriptural products
that respond to the quality expected in the course.
• Compiler
Consolidates the document that is constituted as the final
product of the debate, taking into account that the
contributions of all the participants have been included and
that only the participants who participated in the process
are included. He must inform the person in charge of the
alerts to notify those who did not participate, that they will
not be included in the product to be delivered.
• Reviser
Ensures that the writing complies with the rules for
Roles and
submission of work required by the teacher.
duties for the
• Evaluator
submission of
Ensures that the document contains the criteria present in
products by
the rubric. He must inform the person in charge of the
students
alerts so that he informs the other members of the team in
case there is an adjustment to be made on the subject.
• Deliveries
Alerts about the delivery times of the products and sends
the document in the stipulated times, using the resources
destined for the shipment, and indicates to the other
colleagues that the delivery has been made.
• Alerts
Ensures that the members of the group are notified of the
novelties at work and informs the teacher through the work
forum and the course's messaging, that the document has
been sent.
The APA Rules is the style of organization and presentation
of information most used in the area of social sciences.
These are published under a Manual that allows you to have
access to the ways in which a scientific article should be
presented. Here you can find the most relevant aspects of
References the sixth edition of the APA Standards Manual, such as
references, citations, preparation and presentation of tables
and figures, headings and seriation, among others. You can
check how to implement them by going to
http://normasapa.com/
Evaluation rubric
Activity
Individual Activity ☐ Collaborative Activity ☒
type:
Evaluation
Initial ☐ Intermediate, Unit 2 ☒ Final ☐
moment
Evaluated Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
items High score Average score Low score
The information The information does
The information shows
partially shows that the not show that the
that the student
student explored and student explored and
explored and analyzed
analyzed the reference analyzed the reference
the references for unit
Checking for unit 2. It is partially for unit 2. It is not
2. It is evident that the 30 points
references evident that student evident that student
student understood the
understood the understood the
concepts and masters
concepts and masters concepts and masters
the topics.
the topics. the topics.
(up to 30 points) (up to 15 points) (up to 1 point)
The information The information The information
presented in the presented in the presented in the
document answers fully document partially document does not
the question. The answers partially the answer the question.
question. The student The student does not 35 points
Questions student gave examples
gave examples to better give examples to better
reply to better understand
understand the topic. understand the topic.
the topic.
(up to 35 points) (up to 17 points) (up to 1 point)
The document is The document is not
The document is well
partially well presented well presented and
presented and
and organized. The organized. The
organized. The
information is clear and information is partially information is not clear
Document avoids serious linguistic clear and avoids serious and avoids serious 20 points
format
mistakes. It is uploaded linguistic mistakes. It is linguistic mistakes. It is
in the evaluation uploaded in the not uploaded in the
environment. evaluation environment. evaluation environment.