Sample ABC

August 2009
[Type your address]  [Type your phone number]  [Type your e-mail address]
DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT OF
Introduction to the
Sweetening of Natural Gas
with Emphasis on Sulfur
Recovery
(Sulfur Recovery: 80 tons per day)
OFCHEMICAL
CHEMICALENGINEERING
Project Advisor:
Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed
ENGINEERING
Project Co advisor:
Madam Masooma Sundus
Project Team
Name Registration No.
Imran Shabbir 2005-Chem-79
Omer Farooqi 2005-Chem-97
Jahanzaib Ali Bugti 2005-Chem-95
Ali Shan Malik 2005-Chem-41
Osman Shahid 2005-Chem-65
UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND

TECHNOLOGY LAHORE PAKISTAN
Approval Certificate
INTRODUCTION TO THE SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS
WITH EMPHASIS ON SULFUR RECOVERY
This major project report has been completed and submitted to the Department of Chemical
Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the B.Sc Chemical Engineering degree
Project Team:
Imran Shabbir
Muhammad Omer Farooqi
Jahanzaib Ali Bugti
Ali Shan Malik
Osman Shahid
Approved by:
Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed Prof. Dr. A. R. Saleemi
(Project Advisor) (Chairman)
____________________ ___________________
External Examiner
____________________ ___________________
In the name of
Allah
The most Merciful and
Compassionate, The most Gracious
and Beneficent Whose help and
guidance we always solicit at every step,
in each moment of our lives
DEDICATION
Our parents, whose

blessing brought us at
this stage and who
trample their
inclination & longings
for uploading our
studies
Acknowledgments
Thanks to The Almighty ALLAH, “Who taught us with pen and
told what we did not know” and guided us by the Holy Prophet Hazrat
Mohammad (Peace be upon Him) after whom no further guidance is
needed.
We are indebted to our chairman, Prof. Dr. A. R. Saleemi who

provided us his knowledge and facilities to complete this project.
We acknowledge our indebtedness to our beloved project adviser

Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed and our project co adviser Madam Masuma
Sundus for their timely guidance, encouragement, sympathetic attitude
and professional assistance, without which this project would not have
been completed.
A special thank you goes to Engr. Sir Mohsin Kazmi, Engr. Sir
Faheem and Engr. Sir Qazi Zaka ur Rehman for being so kind and
helping to us. Indeed without their guidance it was not an easy job to
complete this project.
A general debt of gratitude is due to all the teachers of the

Chemical Engineering Department, UET Lahore for their kind help.
There is a deep contribution from our teachers to whatever we have
achieved and whatever we intend to achieve in our lives.
We are also thankful to the non-teaching staff of the department

for their intellectual and moral support.
We extend special thanks to our sweet parents for their unlimited

love, kindness and support throughout our studies, and who pray for our
success and bright future deeply.
AUTHORS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract І
Preface ІІ
Problem Statement (1)
Chapter 1 (2-20)
INTRODUCTION TO NATURAL GAS PROCESSING
1.1 Exploration of Natural Gas
1.2 Processing Natural Gas
1.3 Sweetening
1.3.1 Reasons of Removing H2S and CO2
1.3.2 Amine Solutions used in Sweetening
1.3.3 The Girdler Process
1.4 About Sulfur

1.4.1 Properties of Sulfur
1.4.2 Processing of Sulfur
1.4.3 Uses of Sulfur
1.4.4 Products of Sulfur
1.5 Sulfur Recovery Methods

1.5.1 Medium (0.20 to 25.0 LTPD)
1.5.2 Large (greater than 25.0 LTPD)
1.5.3 Explanation of Various Processes
1.5.3.1 Sulfa Treat Direct Oxidation Process
1.5.3.2 The Claus Process

1.5.3.3 Recycle Selectox Process
1.5.3.4 Selective Oxidation Process
1.5.3.5 Cold Bed Adsorption Process
1.5.3.6 Thermal Cracking of H2S
1.6 The Claus Process

1.6.1 History
1.6.2 Description
1.6.3 Simplified Process Description
1.6.4 Process Improvements
1.6.5 Claus Process Auxiliaries
1.6.5.1 Blow Down System
1.6.5.2 Fuel System
Chapter 2 (21-30)
MAJOR EQUIPMENTS USED IN CLAUS PROCESS & THEIR
IMPROVEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Reaction Furnace (F-100)
2.3 Waste Heat Boiler (B-100)
2.4 Sulfur Condensers (E-100, E-102, E-104, E-106)
2.5 Heaters (E-101, E-103, E-105)

2.5.1 Direct Reheat Methods
2.5.2 Hot Gas Bypass
2.5.3 Acid Gas Fired Line Burner
2.6 Catalytic Reactors (R-100, R-101, R-102)
2.7 Sulfur Pits

Chapter 3 (31-45)
MATERIAL BALANCE OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT (SRU)
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Overall Material Balance
3.3 Material Balance across Furnace F-100
3.4 Material Balance across Condenser E-100
3.5 Material Balance across Reactor R-100
3.11 Final Calculations
Chapter 4 (46-57)
ENERGY BALANCE OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT (SRU)
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Overall Energy Balance
4.3 Energy Balance across Furnace F-100
4.4 Energy Balance across Boiler B-100
4.5 Energy Balance across Condenser E-100
4.6 Energy Balance across Heater E-101
4.7 Energy Balance across Reactor R-100

Chapter 5 (58-93)
EQUIPMENTS DESIGN
5.1 Design of Reaction Furnace (F-100)
5.2 Design of Waste Heat Boiler (B-100)
5.3 Design of Reactors (R-100, R-101, R-102)
5.4 Design of Condenser (E-106)
5.5 Design of Process Stream Heater (E-105)
Chapter 6 (94-97)
PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL
6.1 Introduction
6.2 General Discussion on the Instrumentation of the Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU)
6.2.1 Feed Flow Measurement and Control
6.2.2 Combustion Air Control
6.2.3 Main Burner and Reaction Furnace
6.2.4 Waste Heat Boiler
6.2.5 Sulfur Condensers
6.2.6 Heaters
6.2.7 Catalytic Reactors
6.2.8 Shutdown System

6.3 Instrumentation for Condensers
Chapter 7 (98-101)
MECHANICAL DESIGN OF THE PROCESS STREAM HEATERS
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Waste Heat Boiler
7.3 The Claus Reactors
7.4 Sulfur Condensers
7.5 Sulfur Pits
Chapter 8 (102-104)
HAZOP STUDY OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT (SRU)
8.1 Introduction
8.2 General Safety Rules
8.3 Building and Process Equipment Safety

8.3.1 Lights
8.3.2 Electrical and Mechanical Hazards
8.3.3 Chemical Hazards
8.3.4 Fire Prevention and Control
8.3.5 Personnel Safety
8.4 Claus Process

8.4.1 Special Hazards and Precautions
Chapter 9 (105-112)
COST ESTIMATION OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT (SRU)
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Fixed and Working Capital

9.3 Total Production Cost
9.3.1 Manufacturing Cost
9.3.2 General Expenses
9.4 Equipment Cost
References
ABSTRACT
This project has to design Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU). There are many
processes for the recovery of sulfur from natural gas but we selected the Claus
process, because the design of the process is economically most favorable. The
economics of the plant also make balance with the efficiency and is most suited
to Pakistan’s wells of oil and gas.
The process selected for this purpose is the Claus process and the unit is
designed to produce 80 tons of elemental sulfur per day.
This report includes introduction to natural gas exploration, Dakhni gas

processing plant review, production and processing, various processes
employed for the sulfur recovery from the natural gas, the details of the Claus
process, material and energy balances across the sulfur recovery unit (SRU),
individual equipments design, instrumentation and control, piping, cost
estimation, selection process of the construction material and lining of
refractory, and the safety of the sulfur recovery unit (SRU).
In summary, the focus on the future improvements in the Claus process

makes this project distinctive and particularly relevant for educating present or
perspective engineers. We have worked hard to complete this project that is
stimulating for engineers to read. We also strived to develop the design of the
sulfur recovery unit (SRU) that will capture engineer’s attention, is
pedagogically sound and well integrated with project material, and is easy for
the engineers to use and adapt.
We welcome any comments or suggestions. Please feel free to contact via

e-mail at: chem_protagonists@hotmail.com and
chem_protagonists@yahoo.com, furthermore a soft copy can be obtained on
request at the said e-mail addresses.
I
PREFACE
The aim behind this project is to design the sulfur recovery unit (from
natural gas). The capacity of the proposed plant is 80 tons per day.
Generally, the natural gas obtained from the reservoirs, contains many
impurities including hydrogen disulfide (H2S), the presence of which makes the
gas toxic. To make the use of this gas environmentally acceptable, the gas is
passed through a number of purifying stages. One of these stages is that of
sulfur recovery unit (SRU).
There are many different processes used for the recovery of sulfur from
natural gas. We selected the Claus process, as it is the most economical process
especially for the large amounts to process like we had to. This process mainly
comprises two reactions; first, one by third of the hydrogen disulfide present in
the feed is converted into sulfur dioxide by burning in the furnace and second,
the remaining hydrogen disulfide reacts with the produced sulfur dioxide to
give elemental sulfur. First reaction occurs in a furnace while the second
reaction takes place in a series of reactors. Sulfur produced in the reactors is
then condensed in the condenser. The pipelines throughout are insulated so that
sulfur may not freeze inside the pipes.
Sulfur obtained by this process is used commercially as a hardening

agent in the manufacture of rubber products, such as tires. The most important
use of sulfur is in the manufacture of sulfur compounds, such as sulfuric acid,
sulfites, sulfates, and sulfur dioxide. Medicinally, it has assumed importance
because of its widespread use in sulfa drugs and in many skin ointments. Sulfur
is also employed in the production of matches, wood pulp, carbon disulfide,
insecticides, bleaching agents, vulcanized rubber etc.
II
Problem Statement
This project report had been assigned to us as the partial fulfillment for the
requirement of the B.Sc Chemical Engineering degree. The problem statement is:
“INTRODUCTION TO THE SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS WITH EMPHASIS ON SULFUR
RECOVERY”. The proposed plant capacity is selected to be 80 tons per day which matches
with the prevailing extended market needs and to meet the industrial demands. The
inspiring facility for this project is the Oil and Gas Development Corporation Limited
(OGDCL), Dakhni. This facility has a current production of 65 tons per day of elemental
rhombic sulfur but is interested in extension of the production plants to produce 80 tons per
day which is the very problem assigned to us in this project.
The natural gas obtained from wells contains toxic hydrogen sulfide gas which must
be removed in order to make the use of natural gas safe and friendly. Sweetening is done to
remove hydrogen sulfide gas and then the famous Claus process is employed to recover
elemental rhombic sulfur from the hydrogen sulfide gas stream which is a valuable market
product having its use, in the production of many daily life useful products, as a raw
material.
Fig: Flow diagram for the Claus process.
The project team is guided and motivated by respected Dr. Shahid Naveed as the
project advisor. All of the material and data being presented in this report is taken from
authentic literature and timely references have been provided to guide the reader and at
the same time prevent ourselves of getting divert from the main essence of report writing.
1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1 Exploration of Natural Gas
T
he practice of locating natural gas and petroleum deposits has been transformed
dramatically in the last 15 years with the advent of extremely advanced,
ingenious technology. In the early days of the industry, the only way of locating
underground petroleum and natural gas deposits was to search for surface
evidence of these underground formations. Those searching for natural gas
deposits were forced to scour the earth, looking for seepages of oil or gas emitted from
underground before they had any clue that there were deposits underneath. However,
because such a low proportion of petroleum and natural gas deposits actually seep to the
surface, this made for a very inefficient and difficult exploration process. As the demand for
fossil fuel energy has increased dramatically over the past years, so has the necessity for
more accurate methods of locating these deposits.
1.2 Processing Natural Gas

A Natural Gas Processing Plant Natural gas, as it is used by consumers, is much different
from the natural gas that is brought from underground up to the wellhead. Although the
processing of natural gas is in many respects less complicated than the processing and
refining of crude oil, it is equally as necessary before its use by end users. The natural gas
used by consumers is composed almost entirely of methane. However, natural gas found at
the wellhead, although still composed primarily of methane, is by no means as pure. Raw
natural gas comes from three types of wells: oil wells, gas wells, and condensate wells.
Natural gas that comes from oil wells is typically termed as “associated gas”. This gas can
exist separate from oil in the formation (free gas), or dissolved in the crude oil (dissolved
gas). Natural gas from gas and condensate wells, in which there is little or no crude oil, is
termed ‘non-associated gas’. Gas wells typically produce raw natural gas by itself, while
condensate wells produce free natural gas along with a semi-liquid hydrocarbon
condensate. Whatever the source of the natural gas, once separated from crude oil (if
present) it commonly exists in mixtures with other hydrocarbons; principally ethane,
propane, butane, and pentanes. In addition, raw natural gas contains water vapor,
hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide, helium, nitrogen, and other compounds.
Natural gas processing consists of separating all of the various hydrocarbons and
thuds from the pure natural gas, to produce what is known as ‘pipeline quality’ dry natural
gas. Major transportation pipelines usually impose restrictions on the make-up of the
Introduction to Natural Gas Processing Chapter 1
natural gas that is allowed into the pipeline. That means that before the natural gas can be
transported it must be purified. While the ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes must be
removed from natural gas, this does not mean that they are all ‘waste products’.
In addition to processing done at the wellhead and at centralized processing plants,

some final processing is also sometimes accomplished at ‘straddle extraction plants’. These
plants are located on major pipeline systems. Although the natural gas that arrives at these
straddle extraction plants is already of pipeline quality, in certain instances there still exist
small quantities of NGLs, which are extracted at the straddle plants.
The actual practice of processing natural gas to pipeline dry gas quality levels can be
quite complex but usually involves four main processes to remove the various impurities:
 Oil and Condensate Removal
 Water Removal
 Separation of Natural Gas Liquids
 Sulfur and Carbon Dioxide Removal
Fig 1.1: Diagram of a typical gas processing plant.
3
1.3 Sweetening
Amine gas treating, also known as gas sweetening and acid gas removal, refers to a
group of processes that use aqueous solutions of various alkanolamines (commonly
referred to simply as amines) to remove hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2)
from gases. It is a common unit process used in refineries, petrochemical plants, natural gas
processing plants and other industries. Processes within oil refineries or natural gas
processing plants that remove hydrogen sulfide and/or mercaptans are commonly referred
to as sweetening processes because they result in products which no longer have the sour,
foul odors of mercaptans and hydrogen sulfide.
1.3.1 Reasons of Removing H2S and CO2

Carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and other contaminants are often found in natural
gas streams. CO2 when combined with water creates carbonic acid which is corrosive. CO2
also reduces the BTU value of gas and in concentrations of more that 2% or 3% the gas is
unmarketable. H2S is an extremely toxic gas that is also tremendously corrosive to
equipment. Amine sweetening processes remove these contaminants so that the gas is
marketable and suitable for transportation. The recovered hydrogen sulfide gas stream may
be:
 Vented to atmosphere.
 Flared in waste gas flares or modern smokeless flares.
 Incinerated for sulfur removal.
 Utilized for the production of elemental sulfur or sulfuric acid.
If the recovered H2S gas stream is not to be utilized as a feedstock for commercial
applications, the gas is usually passed to a tail gas incinerator in which the H2S is oxidized to
SO2 and is then passed to the atmosphere out a stack.
1.3.2 Amine Solutions Used in Sweetening
Amine has a natural affinity for both CO2 and H2S allowing this to be a very efficient
and effective removal process. There are many different amines used in gas treating:
 Monoethanolamine (MEA) -Used in low pressure natural gas treatment applications

requiring stringent outlet gas specifications.
 Diethanolamine (DEA) -Used in medium to high pressure treating and does not
require reclaiming as do MEA and DGA systems.
 Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) -Has a higher affinity for H2S than CO2 which allows
some CO2 "slip" while retaining H2S removal capabilities.
 Diisopropylamine (DIPA)
 Aminoethoxyethanol / diglycolamine (DGA)
 Formulated special solvents.
4
However, the most commonly used amines in industrial plants are the
alkanolamines MEA, DEA, and MDEA. Amines are also used in many oil refineries to remove
sour gases from liquid hydrocarbons such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).
1.3.3 The Girdler Process

Natural gas is considered "sour" if hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is present in amounts
greater than 5.7 milligrams per normal cubic meters (mg/Nm3) or 0.25 grains per 100
standard cubic feet [gr/100 scf]). The H2S must be removed (called "sweetening" the gas)
before the gas can be utilized. If H2S is present, the gas is usually sweetened by absorption
of the H2S in an amine solution, also known as the Girdler process.
Other methods, such as carbonate process, solid bed absorbent and physical
absorption, are employed in the other sweetening plants.
The main reaction of the Girdler process is as follows:
2RNH2 + H2S (RNH3)2S

Where:
R = mono, di, or tri-ethanol
N = nitrogen
H = hydrogen
S = sulfur
Fig 1.2: A typical amine gas sweetening plant.
5
1.4 About Sulfur

Sulfur is a non-metallic element that occurs in both combined and free states and is
distributed widely over the earth’s surface. It is tasteless, odorless, insoluble in water, and
often occurs in yellow crystals or masses. It is one of the most abundant elements found in
a pure crystalline form. The word sulfur is Latin for “burning stone”, and was used almost
interchangeably with the term for fire. Because of its combustibility, sulfur was used for a
variety of purposes at least 4,000 years ago.
Although it is plentiful on a world scale, native sulfur is usually found in relatively

minute quantities. The greatest quantity of naturally occurring sulfur by far is combined
with other elements, most notably the sulfides of copper, iron, lead, and zinc, and the
sulfates of barium, calcium (commonly known as gypsum), magnesium, and sodium.
In the late 1 800s the Frasch process - a mining technique that recovers from 75% to
92% of a salt dome’s recoverable sulfur - became operational. Stockpiles today account for
more than 50% of the. US, Canada, Japan, France, Poland, and Mexico are major sulfur
suppliers.
Secondary sources of sulfur today are the sulfur dioxide (SO2) obtained from
industrial mineral, wastes, and flue gasses, and the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) found in “sour”
natural gas, petroleum refinery products, and coke-oven gasses. Once considered
unwelcome byproducts of industrial processes, these sources of sulfur have the advantage
of being nearly inexhaustible.
It was stated that 80% to 85% sulfur production in the year 2000 was recovered
sulfur produced from hydrogen sulfide (H2S).
1.4.1 Properties of Sulfur

Chemical Name: Sulfur
Family Name: Element - Sulfur
Chemical Formula: S8
Physical State: Solid
Appearance: Yellow colored lumps, crystals, powder, or formed shape
Odor: Odorless, or faint odor of rotten eggs if not 100% pure
Purity: 90% - 100%
Molecular Weight: 256.50
6
Vapor Density: (Air = 1): 1.1
Vapor Pressure: 0 mmHg at 280 oF
Solubility in Water: Insoluble
Specific Gravity: 2.07 at 70 oF
Boiling Point: 832 oF (444 oC)
Freezing/Melting Point: 230-246 oF (110-119 oC)
Bulk Density: Lumps 75-1 15 lbs./ft3 Powder 3 3-80 lbs./ft3
Flashpoint: 405 oF (207.2 oC)
Flammable Limits: LEL: 3.3 UEL: 46.0
Auto-ignition Temperature: 478-511 oF (248-266 oC)
Sulfur is an odorless, tasteless, light yellow solid. It is a reactive element that given
favorable circumstances combines with all other elements except gases, gold, and platinum.
Sulfur appears in a number of different allotropic modifications: rhombic, monoclinic,
polymeric, and others. The rhombic structure is the most commonly found sulfur form. Each
allotropic form differs in solubility, specific gravity, crystalline, crystalline arrangement, and
other physical constants. These various allotropes also can exist together in equilibrium in
definite proportions, depending on temperature and pressure.
1.4.2 Processing of Sulfur

Sulfur processing is accomplished in plants using four manufacturing methods,
producing sulfurs described as: Milled sulfurs, Formed sulfurs, Emulsified sulfur, and
Precipitated sulfur.
Milled Sulfurs
These products are produced using Raymond roller mills to grind to specific particle
ranges. Additives such as dispersants, flow aids, and dust suppressants may be added to
enhance product performance.
Formed Sulfurs
These products are produced by molding, drum flaking, or rotoforining, and then
sized to meet specific needs. Additives may be used for degradability.
7
Emulsified Sulfur
These products are manufactured using homogenizing technology to create a water

based suspension.
Precipitated Sulfur
Flowers of sulfur are distilled sulfurs of exceptional purity obtained by sublimation of

sulfur vapor into particulate form in an inert atmosphere.
1.4.3 Uses of Sulfur

Sulfur is an element used for everything from adhesives to matches. Its most
common use is as a hardening agent in the manufacture of rubber products, such as tires.
The most important use of sulfur is in the manufacture of sulfur compounds, such as sulfuric
acid, sulfites, sulfates, and sulfur dioxide. Medicinally, it has assumed importance because
of its widespread use in sulfa drugs and in many skin ointments. Sulfur is also employed in
the production of matches, vulcanized rubber, dyes, and gunpowder. In a finely divided
state and, frequently, mixed with lime, sulfur is used as a fungicide on plants. The salt,
sodium thiosulfate, Na2S2O3.5H2O, commonly called hypo, is used in photography for
“fixing” negatives and prints. When combined with various inert mineral fillers, sulfur forms
a special cement used to anchor metal objects, such as railings and chains, in stone. Sulfuric
acid is one of the most important of all industrial chemicals because it is employed not only
in the manufacture of sulfur-containing molecules but also in the manufacture of numerous
other materials that do not themselves contain sulfur, such as phosphoric acid.
1.4.4 Products of Sulfur

Three major product groups exist according to use: Rubber maker’s, Industrial, and
Agricultural.
Rubber maker’s Sulfur
Sulfur has been used as a rubber chemical since Charles Goodyear discovered its
vulcanizing properties in the mid 1800’s. Pencil erasers, rubber bumpers on automobiles,
and latex gloves all use the same type of product, but in different quantities and heat
variations.
Rubber maker’s sulfur products vary widely in formulation and use. Conditioning
agents are added to improve flow ability, handling, and dispersion characteristics of finely
ground sulfur. Oil is often added as a dust suppressant, reducing the risk of a sulfur dust
explosion.
The following sulfur options are called grades, and offer a wide choice of purity,
fineness, and conditioning agents for rubber processing
8
 Grinding and Screening
 Conditioning Agents
 Oil Treatment
Industrial Sulfur
Industrial sulfurs are 99.5% minimum purity, processed into various physical shapes
to provide a full range of particle sizes. This market includes pulp and paper, metals
reclaiming, mining, steel, oil refining, and a multitude of other uses. Sulfur is also used in
the public utilities sector as a scale inhibitor. Industrial sulfur is available as crude lumps,
flakes, ground sulfur, formed pastilles, or formed briquettes. Flake sulfur can be screened to
a variety of specifications.
Commercial Grades
 Ground sulfurs milled to various specifications.
 Arrow Roll® Refined Sulfur
 Prill
 Animal Feed Sulfur
 Granular / Pastille
 Emulsified
 Flake
Agricultural Sulfur
These products are formulated for use as nutrients, soil amendments, and
pesticides. Their main uses are as fungicides, insecticides, and miticides. Another common
use is as a soil additive to correct alkalinity or sulfur deficiency.
Wettable Sulfurs
Wettable powders are formulated by blending dispersants and surfactants together

and then milling to a very fine particle size. They can be applied as a spray or dust These
products are used primarily as a fungicide or miticide. Wettable sulfur can be applied as a
ground spray or aerial application. Poultry houses can be rid of depluming mites by applying
spray to all interior surfaces. These products are registered by the EPA.
Flowable Sulfur
9
Dispersion or flowable type products are generally used on vine crops such as
grapes, tomatoes, and peanuts. Formulated as water based dispersion weighing six pounds
per gallon and is primarily used as a fungicide. This product can also be used as a soil
amendment if immediate pH correction is required. These products are registered by the
EPA.
Dusting Sulfur
Formulated at 98%, this product is primarily used as a fungicide. This product is

registered by the EPA.
Degradable Sulfur
Formulated at 90%, this product is primarily used as a plant nutrient. Formed as a

pastille or granule, degradable sulfur is also available in various sizes to conform to specific
blend requirements.
1.5 Sulfur Recovery Methods

On a worldwide basis natural gas and crude oil are becoming sourer. As the
sweeter, more desirable natural gas and crude oil supplies are exhausted; more and more
emphasis is placed on these sour, less desirable feed stocks. The sulfur species in natural
gas after its removal is generally in the form of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The most common
means of recovering the sulfur contained in hydrogen sulfide is the Clause process. This
process can recover 93-99% of the sulfur contained in its feed. Recovery depends upon feed
composition, age of catalyst, and number of reactor stages. The gas leaving the Clause plant
is referred to as tail gas and is burnt to convert the remaining hydrogen sulfide, which is
lethal at low levels, to sulfur dioxide, which has a much higher toxic limit. The off-gas stream
is vented to atmosphere or sent to Tail Gas Recovery Plant.
12000
Sulfur Production
10000
Production (MTPD)
Production
8000
(MTPD)
6000 Crude
4000 Production
(MTPD)
2000 Natural Gas
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Fig 1.3: Average production of crude oil and natural gas for sulfur extraction.
10
Processes are differentiated on the bases of capacity as follows.
1.5.1 Medium (0.20 to 25.0 LTPD)

 Sulfa Treat DO (Direct Oxidation) is a medium scale process.
1.5.2 Large (greater than 25.0 LTPD)

 Clause process least expensive, well proven but only economical at large scales.
 Recycle Selectox Process.
 Selective Oxidation Process.
- Parson’s High Activity Process.
- Super Clause Process.
 Wet Oxidation Based on Aqueous Solution.
-Stratford and Sulfoline Process.
-SulFerox Process.
-Bio-SR Process.
 Cold Bed Absorption Process.
- CBA 4 Reactor Scheme.
- CBA 3 Reactor Scheme.
 Thermal Cracking of H2S.
1.5.3 Explanation of Various Processes

A brief description is given below for each of the above mentioned processes. This
discussion will prove helpful in final process selection.
1.5.3.1 Sulfa Treat Direct Oxidation Process
It is a medium scale process which selectively oxidizes H2S to Sulfur and Water.
1
H2S + O2 S + H2O
2
No equilibrium limitations are there because of good catalyst selectivity. This
process recovers 90% of H2S as sulfur in a single step. It uses a patented catalyst and has a
very low capital and operating costs. It can be directly operated on Natural Gas, Syngas and
Hydrogen. It has got a smaller footprint than Liquid Redox or Claus Process.
11
Air
Flue Gas Fig 1.4: A typical flow

Inlet Gas
(syngas diagram of direct
or natural
gas) Feed oxidation (DO)
Preheater
process.
Direct To
Fuel / air
Oxidation downstream
Reactor processing
Liquid
knockout
Sulfur
Condenser
Sulfur
1.5.3.2 The Claus Process
This is the least expensive, well proven but only economical at large scales. It was
developed by Carl Friedrich Claus in 1883. The process was later significantly modified by a
German company; I. G. Farbenindustrie A. G. The Claus technology can be divided into two
process steps, thermal and catalytic.
Thermal Step. In the thermal step, hydrogen sulfide-laden gas reacts in a substoichiometric
combustion at temperatures above 850 °C such that elemental sulfur precipitates in the
downstream process gas cooler. The H2S content and the concentration of other
combustible components (hydrocarbons or ammonia) determine the location where the
feed gas is burned. Claus gases (acid gas) with no further combustible contents apart from
H2S are burned in lances surrounding a central muffle by the following chemical reaction:
3
H2S + O2 SO2 + H2O (∆H = -4147.20 kJ/kgmol)
2
Gases containing ammonia, such as the gas from the refinery's sour water stripper
(SWS), or hydrocarbons are converted in the burner muffle. Sufficient air is injected into the
muffle for the complete combustion of all hydrocarbons and ammonia. The air to the acid
gas ratio is controlled such that in total 1/3 of all hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is converted to SO2.
This ensures a stoichiometric reaction for the Claus reaction (see next section below).
The separation of the combustion processes ensures an accurate dosage of the

required air volume needed as a function of the feed gas composition. To reduce the
process gas volume or obtain higher combustion temperatures, the air requirement can
also be covered by injecting pure oxygen. Several technologies utilizing high-level and low-
level oxygen enrichment are available in industry, which requires the use of a special burner
in the reaction furnace for this process option.
Usually, 60 to 70% of the total amount of elemental sulfur produced in the process is
obtained in the thermal process step. The main portion of the hot gas from the combustion
12
chamber flows through the tube of the process gas cooler and is cooled down such that the
sulfur formed in the reaction step condenses. The heat given off by the process gas and the
condensation heat evolved are utilized to produce medium or low-pressure steam. The
condensed sulfur is removed at the gas outlet section of the process gas cooler.
A small portion of the process gas can be routed through a bypass inside of the
process gas cooler, as depicted in the here above mentioned figure. This hot bypass stream
is added to the cold process gas through a three-way valve to adjust the inlet temperature
required for the first reactor.
Catalytic Step. The Claus reaction continues in the catalytic step with activated aluminum
(III) or titanium (IV) oxide, and serves to boost the sulfur yield. The hydrogen sulfide (H 2S)
reacts with the SO2 formed during combustion in the reaction furnace, and results in
gaseous, elemental sulfur. This is called the Claus reaction:
3
2H2S + SO2 S8 + 2H2O (∆H = -1165.60 kJ/kgmol)
8
The catalytic recovery of sulfur consists of three sub steps: heating, catalytic
reaction and cooling plus condensation. These three steps are normally repeated a
maximum of three times. Where an incineration or tail-gas treatment unit (TGTU) is added
downstream of the Claus plant, only two catalytic stages are usually installed.
The first process step in the catalytic stage is the gas heating process. It is necessary
to prevent sulfur condensation in the catalyst bed, which can lead to catalyst fouling. The
required bed operating temperature in the individual catalytic stages is achieved by heating
the process gas in a reheater until the desired operating bed temperature is reached.
Several methods of reheating are used in industry:
 Hot-gas bypass: this involves mixing the two process gas streams from the process
gas cooler (cold gas) and the bypass (hot gas) from the first pass of the waste-heat
boiler.
 Indirect steam reheaters: the gas can also be heated with high-pressure steam in a
heat exchanger.
 Gas/gas exchangers: whereby the cooled gas from the process gas cooler is
indirectly heated from the hot gas coming out of an upstream catalytic reactor in a
gas-to-gas exchanger.
 Direct-fired heaters: fired reheaters utilizing acid gas or fuel gas, which is burned
substoichiometrically to avoid oxygen breakthrough which can damage Claus
catalyst.
The typically recommended operating temperature of the first catalyst stage is

315 °C to 330 °C (bottom bed temperature). The high temperature in the first stage also
13
helps to hydrolyze COS and CS2, which is formed in the furnace and would not otherwise be
converted in the modified Claus process.
The catalytic conversion is maximized at lower temperatures, but care must be

taken to ensure that each bed is operated above the dew point of sulfur. The operating
temperatures of the subsequent catalytic stages are typically 240 °C for the second stage
and 200 °C for the third stage (bottom bed temperatures).
In the sulfur condenser, the process gas coming from the catalytic reactor is cooled
to between 150 and 130 °C. The condensation heat is used to generate steam at the shell
side of the condenser.
Before storage, liquid sulfur streams from the process gas cooler, the sulfur
condensers and from the final sulfur separator are routed to the degassing unit, where the
gases (primarily H2S) dissolved in the sulfur is removed.
The tail gas from the Claus process still containing combustible components and
sulfur compounds (H2S, H2 and CO) is either burned in an incineration unit or further
desulfurized in a downstream tail gas treatment unit.
Fig 1.5: Flow diagram for the Claus process.
1.5.3.3 Recycle Selectox Process
The Recycle Selectox Process developed by Parsons and Unocal, treats lean acid gas
containing 5 to 30 mole percent H2S. The selector catalyst directly catalyzes the oxidation of
H2S to SO2, eliminating the reaction furnace of Claus Process. It also catalyzes the Claus
reaction of production of elemental sulfur. The exothermic Claus reaction results in a
temperature increase of 30o C in first reactor stage and about 15 o C across the second
stage.
The Recycle Selectox stage usually consists of one Selectox stage, followed by two
Claus stages. A recycler blower dilutes the incoming acid gas with Selectox condenser.
Typical H2S conversion to sulfur is more than 80%. Total sulfur recovery with two
subsequent Claus stages ranges from 94 to 96 percent. If the lean gas contains less than 5
14
percent H2S, the once-through Selectox process can be used. Except for the recycle loop,
equipment arrangement is same.
Fig 1.6: Flow diagram for the Recycle Selectox Process.
1.5.3.4 Selective Oxidation Process
There are two types need to be illustrated in this account.

Parson's Hi-Activity Process
In a Claus unit, complete conversion of H2S and SO2 to elemental sulfur is not
possible due to limitations of thermodynamic chemical equilibrium of the Claus process.
Selective oxidation of H2S to sulfur can be thermodynamically complete as indicated by the
following reaction:
1 1
H2S + O2 Sn + H2O
2 n
Parson's hi-activity process utilizes a series of proprietary catalysts for direct
oxidation of H2S to elemental sulfur. The Hi-activity catalysts, which are prepared with
different mixtures of Iron-based metal oxides without the use of a carrier, posses low
specific surfaces and wild pores , the process scheme is very similar to a conventional
modified Claus unit, except that the last catalytic stage is replaced with h-activity catalyst.
Super Claus Process
The Super Claus process consists of a thermal stage followed by three of four
catalytic reaction stages. The first two or three reactors are filled with standard Claus
catalyst while the last reactor is filled with the selective oxidation catalyst. In the thermal
stage the acid gas is burnt with a sub-stoichiometric amount of controlled combustion air
such that the tail gas leaving the second reactor contains 0.80 to1.50% by volume of H 2S.
15
The catalyst in the last reactor (selective oxidation reactor) oxidizes the H 2S to sulfur
1
(H2S + O2 S + H2O) at a very high efficiency. Because the catalyst neither oxidizes
2
H2S to SO2 and H2O, nor reverses the reaction of sulfur and water to H2S and SO2, a total
sulfur recovery rate in the range of 99% can be obtained, depending on Claus Feed Gas
composition.
1.5.3.5 Cold Bed Adsorption Process
The conventional Claus sulfur recovery process is limited by reaction equilibrium

considerations to sulfur recoveries in the range of 94-97%. Very high (more than 99.8%)
sulfur recoveries can be achieved by adding an amine-based tail gas cleanup process on the
Claus effluent. A good example of this technology is the SCOT process licensed by Shell,
which is often employed in refineries to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions to very low levels.
However, amine-based tail gas cleanup units are not only expensive to build (often 80% or
more of the cost of the upstream Claus plant), but expensive to operate as well. A better
choice of technology for the intermediate sulfur recovery range of 98-99.5% is the so-called
“sub-dew point” Claus process. This process extends the capability of the Claus process by
operating the Claus reaction at a lower temperature, so that the sulfur produced by the
reaction condenses. Since the Claus reaction occurs in the gas phase, this liquid sulfur does
not inhibit the reaction like sulfur vapor does, resulting in a favorable shift in the reaction
equilibrium and higher sulfur conversion. Amoco Corporation developed and licenses the
most widely used sub-dew point Claus process.
A CBA sulfur plant consists of a conventional Claus section and a CBA section. The
thermal and catalytic conversion in the conventional Claus portion of the sulfur plant
usually recovers 90-95% of the inlet sulfur. Adding more conventional Claus catalytic stages
beyond this point would not add much sulfur recovery because the Claus reaction is an
equilibrium reaction and becomes limited by the concentrations of water and sulfur vapor
in the gases flowing through the plant. The CBA portion of the sulfur plant overcomes this
limitation through the use of “sub-dew point” conversion stages. Although catalytic
conversion of H2S and SO2 is higher at lower reactor temperatures, conventional Claus
reactors must be operated at temperatures sufficiently high to keep the sulfur produced
from condensing. Sulfur catalyst will adsorb liquid sulfur in its pores, which blocks the active
sites where the Claus reaction occurs. If the Claus reactor temperature is too low, the sulfur
concentration in the vapor will exceed its dew point concentration, causing liquid sulfur to
form and adsorb on the catalyst. Over time, this liquid sulfur will block all of the active sites
in the catalyst and render the catalyst bed almost completely inactive.
A CBA reactor is operated in a cyclic fashion to avoid complete catalyst deactivation

from liquid sulfur blocking the active sites. The CBA reactor is operated at low temperature
(250-300°F/120-150°C) initially so that it is below the sulfur dew point of the reaction
products (i.e., “sub-dew point”) and the sulfur formed is condensed and adsorbed on the
catalyst. After operating in this manner for a period of time, the CBA reactor is
“regenerated” by flowing hot gas through the reactor to vaporize the adsorbed liquid sulfur,
16
which is then condensed and removed in a down-stream sulfur condenser. This process is
analogous to the processing steps used when dehydrating gas streams with molecular
sieves. There are normally two or more CBA reactors in series so that at least one can be
operating sub-dew point while the other is being regenerated. Not only does a CBA reactor
benefit from a more favorable Claus reaction constant at its lower operating temperature, it
also has the advantage of shifting the Claus reaction equilibrium. The Claus reaction is a
vapor-phase reaction, so condensing the sulfur product removes it from the vapor, forcing
the equilibrium in the Claus reaction further to the right, toward higher conversion. These
two factors allow much higher sulfur conversion than in a conventional Claus reactor,
resulting in overall sulfur recovery efficiencies in excess of 98-99.5% for CBA plants.
The cyclic nature of the CBA process requires process gas switching valves that must
perform in very demanding sulfur vapor services. This has caused significant operation and
maintenance problems in CBA plants designed by other engineering companies and
contractors.
1.5.3.6 Thermal Cracking of H2S
In this process operation at significantly high temperatures is made possible and

economical by oxidation of part of the H2S to provide the energy required for the
decomposition reaction to proceed to a significant extent. Partial oxidation of H2S in the
H2S-containing fuel gas is carried out in the presence of an inert, porous, high-capacity
medium and the intense heat exchange results in flame temperatures that significantly
exceed the adiabatic flame temperature of the gas mixture. By coupling the partial
oxidation of H2S in the porous medium with the H2S decomposition, temperatures as high
as 1400°C (1673K) can be achieved economically within a reaction zone without the input of
external energy, and therefore, no additional CO2 emissions. In this reaction zone, the self-
sustaining conditions are very favorable for the decomposition reaction to proceed to an
industrially significant extent, within a slowly propagating thermal wave.
Fig 1.7: Thermal cracking of H2S.
17
1.6 The Claus Process

The Claus process is the most significant gas desulfurizing process, recovering
elemental sulfur from gaseous hydrogen sulfide. First invented over 100 years ago, the
Claus process has become the industry standard.
1.6.1 History
The process was invented by Carl Friedrich Claus, a chemist working in England. A
British patent was issued to him in 1883. The process was later significantly modified by a
German company called I. G. Farbenindustrie A. G.
1.6.2 Description
The multi-step Claus process recovers sulfur from the gaseous hydrogen sulfide found
in raw natural gas and from the by-product gases containing hydrogen sulfide derived from
refining crude oil and other industrial processes. The by-product gases mainly originate
from physical and chemical gas treatment units (Selexol, Rectisol, Purisol and amine
scrubbers) in refineries, natural gas processing plants and gasification or synthesis gas
plants. These by-product gases may also contain hydrogen cyanide, hydrocarbons, sulfur
dioxide or ammonia.
Gases with an H2S content of over 25% are suitable for the recovery of sulfur in
straight-through Claus plants while alternate configurations such as a split-flow set up or
feed and air preheating can be used to process leaner feeds.
Hydrogen sulfide produced, for example, in the hydro desulfurization of refinery

naphthas and other petroleum oils, is converted to sulfur in Claus plants The overall main
reaction equation is:
2H2S + O2 S2 + 2H2O
In fact, the vast majority of the 64,000,000 metric tons of sulfur produced worldwide
in 2005 was byproduct sulfur from refineries and other hydrocarbon processing plants.
Sulfur is used for manufacturing sulfuric acid, medicine, cosmetics, fertilizers and rubber
products.
Inevitably a small amount of H2S remains in the tail gas. This residual quantity,
together with other trace sulfur compounds, is usually dealt with in a tail gas unit. The latter
can give overall sulfur recoveries of about 99.8%, which is very impressive indeed.
Gases containing ammonia, such as the gas from the refinery's sour water stripper
(SWS), or hydrocarbons are converted in the burner muffle. Sufficient air is injected into
the muffle for the complete combustion of all hydrocarbons and ammonia. Air to the acid
18
gas is controlled such that in total 1/3 of all hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is converted to SO2. This
ensures a stoichiometric reaction for the Claus reaction.
Fig 1.8: The Claus process for sulfur recovery.
1.6.3 Simplified Process Description

 The hot combustion products from the furnace at 1000- 1300 °C enter the waste heat
boiler and are partially cooled by generating steam. Any steam level from 3 to 45 bar
g can be generated.
 The combustion products are further cooled in the first sulfur condenser, usually by
generating LP steam at 3 – 5 bar g. This cools the gas enough to condense the sulfur
formed in the furnace, which is then separated from the gas and drained to a
collection pit.
 In order to avoid sulfur condensing in the downstream catalyst bed, the gas leaving
the sulfur condenser must be heated before entering the reactor.
 The heated stream enters the first reactor, containing a bed of sulfur conversion
catalyst. About 70% of the remaining H2S and SO2 in the gas will react to form sulfur,
which leaves the reactor with the gas as sulfur vapor.
 The hot gas leaving the first reactor is cooled in the second sulfur condenser, where
LP steam is again produced and the sulfur formed in the reactor is condensed.
 A further one or two more heating, reaction, and condensing stages follow to react
most of the remaining H2S and SO2.
 The sulfur plant tail gas is routed either to a Tail Gas treatment Unit for further
processing, or to a Thermal Oxidizer to incinerate all of the sulfur compounds in the
tail gas to SO2 before dispersing the effluent to the atmosphere.
1.6.4 Process Improvements
19
Over the years many improvements have been made to the Claus process. Recent
developments include:
 SUPERCLAUS (TM). A special catalyst in the last reactor oxidizes the H2S selectively to sulfur,
avoiding formation of SO2. Significantly higher conversions are obtained at modest cost.
 Oxygen Claus. The combustion air is mixed with pure oxygen. This reduces the amount of
nitrogen passing through the unit, making it possible to increase throughput.
 Better Catalysts. Higher activities have been achieved with catalysts that provide higher
surface areas and macro porosity.
More improvements can be expected. Here are some possibilities.
 CS2 destruction. Carbon disulfide (CS2) is a side product made in the furnace. Laboratory
work has shown that special catalysts operating in the furnace can destroy the CS2 before it
gets into the catalytic section. A commercially available catalyst like this might be developed
for use in a Claus plant.
 Catalyst Temperature Policy. The conversion of H2S goes faster at higher temperatures, but a
more favorable equilibrium is obtained at lower temperatures. It isn't obvious whether
higher or lower temperatures are needed in the third converter. Kinetic modeling may supply
the answer, thereby improving conversion or reducing catalyst replacement cost.
1.6.5 Claus Process Auxiliaries

Following are some of the auxiliaries being used in the Claus process.
1.6.5.1 Blow Down System

Boiler blow down flows is collected and drained into SBD-1. Steam Blow Down Drum. The
steam is vented from the top of SBD-1 and liquid flows from the bottom to SBC-1,Steam Blow Down
Cooler. The blow down flows from E-2 to the drain system.
1.6.5.2 Fuel System

Fuel gas is supplied from OSBL services. The three users are F-1 (Muffle furnace), TG-1 ( Tail
Gas Incinerator), and a PA-1(Package Auxiliary Box). In normal operation, fuel flows only to TG-1.
The fuel to F-1 is used only in start up when heating the unit. The fuel to PA-1 is used only when the
clause process is shut down, then PA-1 is used to supply steam for heating services, primarily on the
liquid sulfur containing lines and equipment.
There are two different fuel gases. One is natural gas types and is supplied to all three-fuel
users. The other fuel gas is vaporized LPG which is supplied only to PA-1 to provide an alternate fuel
for this equipment.
20
Chapter 2
MAJOR EQUIPMENTS USED IN CLAUS PROCESS
2.1 Introduction
T
he major equipment items used in the project are discussed in this chapter,
generally in the order of process flow through the SRU. The concept presented
is intended to improve the SRU reliability and are not intended to be complete
design guidelines. A general comment that applies to all equipment items is to
provide pressure point/sample point connections between all major equipment
items. These will prove invaluable in troubleshooting the SRU.
2.2 Reaction Furnace (F-100)

The main burner and reaction furnace combine to form the SRU thermal reactor.
The burner and reaction furnace are normally mounted horizontally with the burner
coaxially mounted on the end of the reaction furnace.
The thermal reactor is the heart of the SRU even though it is frequently selected or
designed without considering its level of importance. We consider the main burner to be
the most important piece of equipment in the SRU. The burner must perform the function
of burning one third of the feed hydrogen disulfide (H2S) to sulfur dioxide (SO2) to satisfy
the stoichiometric requirements of the modified Claus process, while also destroying
impurities in the acid gas feed and consuming all of the oxygen in the combustion air. The
burner must be capable of performing efficiently at normal operating feed rates and low
turn down rates. The burner must also be capable of substoichiometric burning of natural
gas during start up and shut down operations.
The use of a very efficient mixing, high intensity burner is preferred. Inefficient
burners are frequently employed in SRU’s around in many industries. Frequently, these
burners are not able to achieve adequate destruction of impurities, complete oxygen
consumption and tend to produce some amounts of sulfur trioxide (SO3). These
shortcomings can result in equipment corrosion, catalyst deactivation, and plugging of
piping, equipment and catalyst beds. All of these adverse results reduce the SRU reliability
since under these conditions the requirement for shutting down of unit increases for
maintenance repairs, catalyst change and/or unblocking an obstruction. The burner must
accomplish the combustion reactions. The combustion reactions are relatively fast. The
reaction furnace provides the residence time at high temperature required
Major Equipments Used in the Claus Process Chapter 2
for the Claus reactions and side reactions to occur. Many feed impurities and intermediate
components must be destroyed in the reaction furnace or they will cause downstream
problems.
These components must have adequate time for the reactions to reach
completion/equilibrium. The reaction furnace should have 5 to 7 seconds residence time.
The specific features and residence time required for an individual reaction furnace are
dependent on several factors including the operating temperature and expected feed
impurities.
2.3 Waste Heat Boiler (B-100)

A WHR boiler is a closed vessel in which water or other fluid is heated. The heated or
vaporized fluid exits the WHR boiler for use in various processes or heating applications.
The various types of waste heat boilers include:
• Fire-Tube Boiler.
• Water-Tube Boiler.
• Vertical boiler.
• Hydronic Boiler.
Fire-Tube Boiler:
A fire-tube boiler is a type of boiler in which hot gases from a fire pass through one
or more tubes running through a sealed container of water. The heat energy from the gases
passes through the sides of the tubes by thermal conduction, heating the water and
ultimately creating steam.
Water-Tube Boiler:
It is a type of boiler in which water circulates in tubes heated externally by the fire.
Water tube boilers are used for high-pressure boilers. Fuel is burned inside the furnace,
creating hot gas which heats water in the steam-generating tubes. In smaller boilers,
additional generating tubes are separate in the furnace, while larger utility boilers rely on
the water-filled tubes that make up the walls of the furnace to generate steam.
Vertical Boiler:
22
The Cyclone Hot Water Boilers provide for exceptionally high efficiencies, lower fuel
costs, and extremely rugged construction. Compact space saving vertical design four-pass
design shock proof, no tubes to loosen or burn out. Convenient access to "eye high" burner
solid state controls for trouble free operation factory assembled, fully automatic UL and
ASME CSD-1. Simple and inexpensive to install.
Hydronic Boiler:
Hydronic boilers are used in generating heat for residential and industrial purposes.
They are the typical power plant for central heating systems fitted to houses in northern
Europe (where they are commonly combined with domestic water heating), as opposed to
the forced-air furnaces or wood burning stoves more common in North America. The
Hydronic boiler operates by way of heating water/fluid to a preset temperature (or
sometimes in the case of single pipe systems, until it boils and turns to steam) and
circulating that fluid throughout the home typically by way of radiators, baseboard heaters
or through the floors. The fluid can be heated by any means...gas, wood, fuel oil, etc, but in
built-up areas where piped gas is available, natural gas is currently the most economical and
therefore the usual choice. The fluid is in an enclosed system and circulated throughout by
means of a motorized pump.
2.4 Sulfur Condensers (E-100, E-102, E-104, E-106)

The Claus sulfur recovery process consists of four repeating steps for sulfur
condensation. Sulfur condensers serve the primary function of cooling and condensing
sulfur formed in the upstream reaction step. Sulfur condensers are normally horizontal,
kettle type shell and tube boilers. However, sulfur condensers are unique heat exchangers.
In addition to condensing product sulfur from the process gases, the liquid sulfur must also
be separated from the process gases before they flow to the next processing step. This is
normally done in an oversized outlet channel. Sulfur condensers are also unique because
the process gas flow rate through the condensers must be maintained within a specific
operating range/velocity or there will be adverse effects on the process. The term to
describe this flow property is the “Mass Velocity”, which is normally expressed as “pounds
of process gas flow per second per square foot of cross sectional flow area”. The
recommended mass velocity operating range is 1.50 to 5.50 lb/sec-ft2.
Ideally sulfur is condensed from the process gas at the cool condenser tube walls,
flows from the tube into the outlet channel, is separated from the process gas, and is
drained from the condenser. If the mass velocity is too high, liquid sulfur can be entrained in
the process gas and be carried to the next stage or from the SRU instead of draining from
the tube. If the mass velocity is too low, sulfur can condense in the vapor as a very small
droplet or fog. The sulfur fog droplets are so small that the gas stream carries them much
23
like atmospheric fog or smoke to the next stage or from the SRU. In either of these cases,
sulfur recovery is lost. Lower recovery does not directly affect SRU reliability, but lower SRU
recovery will cause additional load on the downstream tail gas cleanup unit or increase the
plant emissions. Either of these conditions may ultimately cause the SRU to be shut down
permanently for maintenance.
Some designs utilize one or more of condensers as BFW preheaters upstream of the
WHB. The lower level heat from the condenser is used to increase the generation of higher
pressure stream by preheating the WHB feed water. The condenser shell must operate at
the BFW header pressure with this design. But this will exert excessive stress on the tube to
tube sheet attachment and reduces unit reliability. If sulfur condensers are used as BFW
preheaters, the tubes should be strength welded to the tube sheet. Some designs allow the
first condenser to act like the BFW preheater but some steam is generated on the shell side
of the sulfur condenser. Because the shell is not designed for vaporizing conditions, vapor
blanketing of some tubes can occur. This can result in overheating the tubes and sulfide
corrosion.
Some designs also use cold BFW on the shell of the final sulfur condenser to
minimize the process outlet temperature and maximize sulfur recovery.
As mentioned above, generation of low pressure steam to minimize the process

outlet temperature is preferred because if the BFW is too cold, there is a potential to freeze
the sulfur in the tubes.
It is essential for each sulfur condenser to have an independent sulfur seal and look
box. The ability to observe the sulfur production from each condenser is a very valuable
process evaluation and troubleshooting tool. The sulfur rate, consistency of rate, color,
temperature, and presence of bubbles are all important information items that can only be
obtained from individual seals and look boxes.
Each sulfur condenser drain line, sulfur seal, look box and rundown line to the sulfur
pit should be fully steam jacketed. The drain line between the condenser and seal should
have a steam jacketed plug valve located as close as practical to the condenser to allow on-
line rodding of the drain line and sulfur seal. Clear access must be provided for rodding the
drain line and overhead access must be provided to rod the seal.
Some plants have implemented a method to flush sulfur seals to keep the seals open
and free flowing. Steam jacketed piping with block valves are employed from the sulfur
pump discharge to the inlet of each sulfur seal. This allows flushing the individual seals by
closing the block valve in the drain line from the condenser and flowing product sulfur from
the pump discharge through the seal and back to the sulfur pit. This is an excellent and safe
24
method to keep the seals free flowing. Some plants use steam to periodically blow the
sulfur seals when there is an indication of partial plugging. While this method normally
works, we feel it should not be done as a routine practice because of the safety risks from
the hot liquid sulfur.
2.5 Heaters (E-101, E-103, E-105)

Reheaters definitely offer more options to the process designer than any other item
in the SRU. There are two general types of reheaters, direct and indirect. There are also
multiple options within each type.
Indirect method is preferred over direct method; however, each method has specific
applications where it should be considered. Each reheating method is briefly discussed
below.
2.5.1 Direct Reheat Methods

Direct reheat methods use a hot gas stream that is mixed with the process gas to increase
the temperature of the mixed stream to the desired inlet temperature of the downstream catalytic
reactor. The hot gas stream may originate within the process or from combustion. The direct reheat
methods are hot gas bypass, acid gas fired line burner, and natural gas fired line burner, and natural
gas fired line burner, if any of the direct methods are used, it is very important to insure there is
adequate mixing of the streams upstream of the temperature control point.
2.5.2 Hot Gas Bypass

This method has been used in many SRU's. It uses a hot stream from the first pass outlet of
the WHB (1000-1200F) to mix with process gas streams from the sulfur condensers.
It is inexpensive to install, but it has the disadvantages of lowering sulfur recovery by

bypassing conversion steps with a portion of the process gas, poor turndown performance, and high
temperature sulfide corrosion of carbon steel piping and control valves. The corrosion problems can
be minimized with proper metallurgy, but this is often not done because the cost is higher, and low
cost is a primary reason to use hot gas bypass reheat.
The only reason to use hot gas bypass reheat in current design is for very small, isolated
location plants that do not have access to high pressure steam or adequate, reliable electric power
supplies.
2.5.3 Acid Gas Fired Line Burner
25
Acid gas fired burners have been used in many SRU’s. There primary advantage the ability to
achieve any desired catalytic reactor inlet temperature. However, line burners have disadvantages.
The overall sulfur recovery is normally reduced because acid gas bypasses some conversion steps.
The burner air/fuel ratio must be closely controlled or oxygen breakthrough, soot formation, and/or
SO3 formation is likely.
We prefer to use a steam reheater design in which the high pressure steam is on the tube
side of a U-tube type heat exchanger. This type design avoids having to design the shell for the high
pressure steam and avoids tube to tube sheet stresses which can cause failures with steam leakage
into the process and SRU shutdown to make repairs. The U-tube bundle, free to expand within the
shell, avoids these mechanical stresses.
2.6 Catalytic Reactors (R-100, R-101, R-102)

Reactor is a vessel in which different species react to forma product under specified
operating conditions.
TYPES OF RECTOR:
Chemical reactors come in the form of vessels or tanks for batch reactors or back-
mix flow reactors ,as cylinders for fluidized bed reactors or as single or multiple tubes inside
a cylindrical container for plug flow reactor.
CATALYTIC REACTOR:
Use of catalysts requires modification to basic reactor design in order to account for
mass and energy transport issues arising from catalysts.
FIXED BED REACTOR (FBR):
These reactors are solid-catalyst containing vessels. Their design can lead to high
pressure drops. These units are generally used in heterogeneous catalysis where the
catalysts and reacting species are of different phases. The major advantage of such units is
their simplicity and ease of catalyst access for maintenance and regeneration. Use of
multiple fixed beds can improve both heat transport and control resulting in improved
performance while maintaining the relative simplicity of this reactor arrangement.
MULTIPLE TUBULAR REACTORS:
These types of reactors are modified multiple fixed bed units , where the multiple
beds are catalyst-filled tubes arranged in parallel with a heat conducting fluid flowing
outside the tubes. These reactors offer good thermal control and uniform residence time
distribution , but experience increased complexity as well as catalyst in accessibility.
Catalyst access is somewhat simplified by packed tube arrangement although packing and
removing the catalyst from the tubes can still be difficult.
SLURRY REACTOR:
26
Reaction of slurries containing solid particles that can be physically separated from
the suspension fluid are often best performed in agitated tank-type fluid reactors. The
reactor offer simplicity good transport properties and control while sacrificing nothing in
catalyst access since catalyst particles can be added and removed continuously. There is
however, an increased element of equipment degradation due to particle impingement on
the fluid handling equipment, such as impellers, nozzles and pipes.
MOVING BED REACTOR:
These units are also fluid reactors used where the fluid contains solid particles that
can be physically separated from from the suspension fluid. In this case however, the slurry
travels through the reactor in essentially plug flow. Again simplicity , access and control are
good with a uniform residence time distribution.
FLUIDIZED BED REACTORS:
These are reactors with a gas phase-working fluid that requires gas flow around and
past fine particles at a rate sufficient to fluidize the particles suspended within the reactor.
There are considerable operating difficulties associated with initiating and running fluidized
bed reactors due to flow and suspension issues. Further these types of reactors have large
residence time distribution of the ease of back flow in the gas and approach CSTR
behaviour. The advantages of these reactors are their ability to process fine particles and
suitability to high reaction rate processes.
THIN OR SHALLOW BED REACTORS:
These designations are reserved for reactors where the reactant fluid flow through
catalyst meshes or thin beds. These are simple reactors particularly suitable for fast
reaction that require good control where catalyst access is important for purposes of
catalyst reactivation or maintenance or where large heats of reaction are involved.
DISPERSION REACTORS:
These types of reactors are fluid-containing vessels that allow dispersion of liquid
and gas phase reactants by bubbling the latter through the liquid or dripping the liquid into
the gas stream or into a less dense liquid, to achieve increased contact area and reaction
performance. Even though these reactors are simple and inexpensive reactors, they require
careful planning due to their sensitivity to flow behaviour.
FILM REACTORS:
A reactor design that maximizes contact area for gas/liquid reactions is film the
reactor that brings together a gas and liquid as a thin film over a solid support. This type of
reactor offers an added benefit of increased thermal control via the solid support. Such as
arrangement also allows for complex phase dependent reactions in which solid, liquid and
gas phase are involved.
27
SELECTION OF REACTORS:
The selection of best reactor type for a given process is subjected to # of major
consideration. Such design aspects, for example,
1) Temperature and pressure of the reaction.

2) Need for removal or addition of reactants and products.
3) Required pattern of product delivery (continuous or batch wise)
4) Catalyst use consideration, such as the requirements for solid catalyst particle
replacement and contact with fluid reactants and products;
5) Relative cost of reactors.
REACTOR USED FOR CATALYTIC STEP OF CLAUSE PROCESS:
The reactor used for catalytic step of clause process of sulphur recovery is the fixed
bed catalytic reactor. The most important characteristic of FBR is that material flows
through the reactor as plug, all of the stream flows at the same velocity, parallel to reactor
axis with no back mixing. All material present at any given reactor cross-section has had an
identical residence time.
 They can be classified according to the manner in which the temperature is

controlled into reactors with adiabatic reaction control.
 Fixed bed reactors contain a bed of catalyst pellets.
 The catalyst lifetime in these reactors is greater than three months.
 These are rectors widely used in petro-chemical industries.
 They can generally be carried out continuously at low to medium pressure.
Fixed bed reactors are often referred to as packed bed reactors. They may be
regarded as the workhorse of the chemical industry w.r.t. number of reactors employed and
the economic value of materials produced. In a FBR, for a fluid- solid reaction, the solid
catalyst is present as a bed of relatively small particles randomly oriented and fixed in
position. The fluid moves by convective flow through the spaces between the particles.
There may also be diffusive flow or transport within the particles.We also focus on steady-
state operation thus ignoring any implications of catalyst deactivation with time.
INDUSTRIAL IMPLICATIONS OF FBR:
 Synthesis of Ammonia
 Production of styrene monomer by dehydrogenation of ethyl benzene.
 Alkylation of benzene to ethyl benzene.
 Production of sulphuric acid.
 Synthesis of butynediol from acetylene and formaldehyde.
FLOW ARRANGEMENT:
Traditionally most FBR are operated with axial flow of liquid down the bed of solid.
28
ADIABATIC MODE OF OPERATION:
In adiabatic operation, no attempt is made to adjust temp within the bed by means
of beat transfer. For a reactor consisting of one bed of catalyst, this defines the situation
thermally. If catalyst is divided into two or more beds arranged in series (a multistage
reactor). There is an opportunity to adjust temp b/w stages, even if each step is operated
adiabatically this may be done in two ways:
(1) Ist involves the inter-stage beat transfer by means of heat exchangers used for
either exothermic or endothermic reaction.
(2) Second called the COLD-SHOT COOLING, can be used for exothermic reactions
PURPOSE OF ADJUSTMENT OF TEMP:
(1) To shift an equilibrium limit so as to increase fractional conversion or yield.

(2) To maintain relatively light rate of reaction to decrease amount of catalyst and
size of vessel required.
DESIGN CONSIDERATION:
The most important factor to be considered in the design of such reactors is:
 Residence time distribution: influence on conversion and selectivity.
 Temp control: maintenance of temp limits, axially and radialy , min temp diff,
b/w reactor medium and catalyst surface , as well as within the catalyst particle.
 Catalyst lifetime and catalyst regeneration
 Pressure drop as a function of catalyst shape and gas velocity.
In addition to flow, thermal and bed arrangement an important design consideration
is the amount of catalyst required and its possible distribution over two or more stages. This
is the measure of size of reactor. The depth (L) and diameter (D) of each stage must also be
determined.
CATALYST USED:
Catalyst used in catalyst step of clause process is activated alumina (Al203) in the
form of spherical pellets.
CONSIDERATION OF PARTICLE AND BED CHARACTERISTICS:-
Characteristics of a catalyst particle include its chemical composition, which

primarily determines its catalyst activity and its physical properties such as size, shape,
density and porosity or voidage which determines the diffusion characteristics.
29
2.7 Sulfur Pits

Product sulfur is normally collected in a below grade, concrete pit equipped with steam coils
to keep the sulfur molten. The pit doesn't directly effect the SRU process operation until the SRU
must be shut down because of problems with the pit. Some common sulfur pit problems are steam
coil leakage, sulfur pump failure, internal sulfur fires, and even internal explosions. There are a few
design features that will significantly improve the reliable operation of the sulfur pit.
1. Construct the pit using sulfate resistant concrete with limestone- free aggregate.
2. Use alloy piping for the steam coil steam supply down comers and condensate risers,
and any internal components such as ladder rungs that will be alternately covered with
liquid sulfur and then exposed to air as the pit level changes.
3. Install dual steam jacketed sulfur transfer pumps.
4. Use a fully steam jacketed steam eductor to continuously draw atmospheric air into the
pit, sweeping vapor space to prevent the accumulation of H2S.
5. Steam snuffing connection(s) for extinguishing internal sulfur fires.
6. The number of inlets depends on the size and configuration of the pit.
30
Chapter 3
MATERIAL BALANCE OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
(SRU)
3.1 Introduction
T
he material balance across the proposed sulfur recovery unit (SRU) is done by
the conservation equation of mass, as is done conventionally. A system must
be defined to account for the streams entering and leaving. In our case the
obvious selection is the sulfur recovery unit (SRU) itself, while all the other
premises are considered surroundings. Some preliminary bases are to be
specified for the sake of convenience in the calculations. Following
specifications are taken to meet the above mentioned situation:
 Sulfur production: 80 tons per day

 Time of operation: 1 hr
Now the material balance calculations are made first along the whole unit and then
across individual equipments. It is to be noted that whether the calculations are made
across the whole unit or the individual equipments, the basic law of conservation of mass
equation remains the same and is given as:
Amount of substance Amount of substance Amount of substance
entering the system - leaving the system + generated within the -
through the boundaries through the boundaries system boundaries
Amount of substance Amount of substance
consumed within the = accumulated within the (3.1)
system boundaries system boundaries
3.2 Overall Material Balance

The chemical reactions taking place are:
Material Balance of the SRU Chapter 3
Main Reactions:
3
1- H2S + O2 SO2 + H2O (3.2)
2
3
2- SO2 + 2H2S S8 + 2H2O (3.3)
8
Side Reactions:
3- CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O (3.4)
𝟕
4- C2H6 + O2 2CO2 + 2H2O (3.5)
2
5- C3H8 + 5O2 3CO2 + 4H2O (3.6)
Flow Rate = ? Flow Rate = 13 kgmol/hr
H2S = 0.523 S8 = 0.999
CO2 = 0.376 H2O = 0.001
CH4 = 0.004
H2O = 0.010
C2H6 = 0.0008
Flow Rate = ?
C3H8 = 0.0001
O2 = 0.210
N2 = 0.790
Fig 3.1: Overall material balance across SRU.
NOTE: In all the diagrams the compositions are mentioned in mole fraction basis
Sulfur production target (S8) = 80 ton/day
=
80 1 1000 1
tons day kg kgmol
24 1 256.5
day hr ton kg
= 13.0 kgmol/hr
16
H2S required by S8 = × 13.0 kgmol (from equ. 3.3)
3
32
= 69.30 kgmol
H2S supply for S8 (on account for 99.9% conversion from the Claus process)
= 0.999 × 69.30 kgmol = 69.37 kgmol

8
SO2 required by S8 = 3 × 13.0 kgmol (from equ. 3.2)
= 34.65 kgmol
H2S consumed for SO2 = 34.65 kgmol (from equ. 3.2)
Total H2S supplied = 69.37 kgmol + 34.65 kgmol = 104.03 kgmol
Total acid gas feed supply = 104.03 kgmol /0.523 = 198.80 kgmol
Now the Stream-01 composition is as follows:
Stream-01 composition
Component Mole fraction Flow rate-F01 (kgmol/hr)
H2S 0.523 104.03
CO2 0.376 74.83
CH4 0.004 0.95
H2O 0.010 18.80
C2H6 0.0008 0.16
C3H8 0.0001 0.02
TOTAL 1.0 198.80
3.3 Material Balance across Furnace F-100
It is to be noted that according to the specifications of the Claus process only
30% of total sulfur dioxide produces in the furnace is converted into elemental sulfur. 1
Flow Rate = 198.80 kgmol/hr Flow Rate = ?
H2S = 0.523 H2S =?
CO2 = 0.376 CO2 =?
CH4 = 0.004 N2 =?
H2O = 0.010 SO2 =?
C2H6 = 0.0008 H2O =?

Flow Rate = 259.7 kgmol/hr
C3H8 = 0.0001 S8 =?
O2 = 0.210
N2 = 0.790
Fig 3.2: Material balance across furnace F-100.

1 th
“Sulfur Recovery”, GPSA Engineering data book Vol. 2, 11 edition, 1998. Chapter 22
33
In the furnace the following chemical reactions are taking place:
Main Reactions:
3
1- H2S + O2 SO2 + H2O (3.2)
2
3
2- SO2 + 2H2S S8 + 2H2O (3.3)
8
Side Reactions:
3- CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O (3.4)

7
4- C2H6 + O2 2CO2 + 2H2O (3.5)
2
5- C3H8 + 5O2 3CO2 + 4H2O (3.6)
SO2 produced = 34.65 kgmol (from equ. 3.3)
H2S still available for S8 production = 104.03 kgmol - 34.65 kgmol = 69.37 kgmol
H2S consumed for S8 production = 10.4 kgmol × 2 = 20.80 kgmol
H2S remaining = 69.37 kgmol - 20.80 kgmol = 48.58 kgmol
SO2 consumed = 34.65 kgmol × 0.30 = 10.40 kgmol
SO2 remaining = 34.65 kgmol - 10.40 kgmol = 24.25 kgmol

3
S8 produced = 8 ×10.40 kgmol = 3.90 kgmol
O2 required in SO2 formation = 52.0 kgmol (from equ. 3.2)
O2 required in CH4 combustion = 1.90 kgmol (from equ. 3.4)
O2 required in C2H6 combustion = 0.55 kgmol (from equ. 3.5)
O2 required in C3H8 combustion = 0.10 kgmol (from equ. 3.6)
Total O2 required = 52.0 kgmol + 1.90 kgmol + 0.55 kgmol +
0.10 kgmol
= 54.54 kgmol
Air fed to furnace = 54.54 kgmol / 0.210
= 259.70 kgmol
N2 going in = N2 going out = 259.70 kgmol × 0.790
34
= 205.20 kgmol
CO2 generated in CH4 combustion = 0.95 kgmol (from equ. 3.4)
CO2 generated in C2H6 combustion = 0.31 kgmol (from equ. 3.5)
CO2 generated in C3H8 combustion = 0.05 kgmol (from equ. 3.6)
CO2 going out = 0.95 kgmol + 0.31 kgmol + 0.05 kgmol +
74.83 kgmol
= 76.16 kgmol
H2O formed in SO2 production = 34.65 kgmol (from equ. 3.2)
H2O formed in CH4 combustion = 1.90 kgmol (from equ. 3.4)
H2O formed in C2H6 combustion = 0.47 kgmol (from equ. 3.5)
H2O formed in C3H8 combustion = 0.08 kgmol (from equ. 3.6)
H2O formed in S8 production = 20.80 kgmol (from equ. 3.3)
Total H2O produced = 34.65 kgmol + 1.90 kgmol + 0.47 kgmol +
0.08 kgmol + 20.80 kgmol
= 58.0 kgmol
H2O going out = 58.0 kgmol + 18.80 kgmol = 76.72 kgmol
Now the Stream-02, Stream-03 and Stream-04 compositions are as follows:
O2 0.210 54.54
N2 0.790 205.20
TOTAL 1.0 259.70
H2S 0.116 48.58
CO2 0.183 76.16
N2 0.50 205.20
SO2 0.058 24.25
35
H2O 0.140 58.0

S8 0.010 3.90
TOTAL 1.0 416.0
There is no need for the calculation of material balance across the waste heat
boiler B-100 since no material change takes place in there. So the composition of Stream-03
and Stream-04 are identical.
H2S 0.116 48.58
CO2 0.183 76.16
N2 0.50 205.20
SO2 0.058 24.25
H2O 0.140 58.0
S8 0.010 3.90
TOTAL 1.0 416.0
Only energy changes occur and in the subsequent chapter related to the energy
balance, calculations are made across it.

All of the sulfur produced in the furnace F-100 is condensed in the first
condenser E-100, along with some water. The purity of sulfur extracted is 99.9%.
H2S = 0.116 H2S =?
CO2 = 0.183 CO2 =?
N2 = 0.50 N2 =?
SO2 = 0.058 SO2 =?
H2O = 0.140 H2O =?
S8 = 0.010 Flow Rate = ?
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111
Fig 3.3: Material balance across condenser E-100.
S8 going in Stream-S21 = 3.90 kgmol
36
3.90 kgmol
Total amount of Stream-S21 = = 3.91 kgmol
0.999
H2O going in Stream-S21 = 3.91 kgmol × 0.111 = 0.004 kgmol
H2O going in Stream-05 = 58.0 kgmol – 0.004 kgmol = 57.90 kgmol
Now the Stream-S21 and Stream-05 compositions are as follows:
Stream-S21 composition
Component Mole fraction Flow rate-FS21 (kgmol/hr)
S8 0.999 3.90
H2O 0.001 0.004
TOTAL 1.0 3.904
H2S 0.117 48.58
CO2 0.184 76.16
N2 0.50 205.20
SO2 0.058 24.25
H2O 0.140 57.90
TOTAL 1.0 412.0
Again there is no need for the application of material balance calculations

around the heat exchanger E-101. So the Stream-06 has the same composition as that of
Stream-05.
H2S 0.117 48.58
CO2 0.184 76.16
N2 0.50 205.20
SO2 0.058 24.25
H2O 0.140 57.90
TOTAL 1.0 412.0
37
Flow Rate = ?
H2S =?
H2S = 0.117
CO2 =?
CO2 = 0.184
N2 =?
N2 = 0.50
SO2 =?
SO2 = 0.058
H2O =?
H2O = 0.140
S8 =?
Fig 3.4: Material balance across reactor R-100.
Now, according to the specifications of the Claus process, the reactor R-100
converts only 70% of the incoming sulfur dioxide into elemental sulfur.1 Thus:
SO2 consumed in S8 production = 24.25 kgmol × 0.70 = 16.90 kgmol
SO2 remaining = 24.25 kgmol – 16.90 kgmol = 7.27 kgmol
H2S consumed in S8 production = 16.90 kgmol × 2 (from equ. 3.3)
= 33.90 kgmol
H2S remaining = 48.58 kgmol – 33.90 kgmol = 14.62 kgmol
H2O formed along with S8 = 16.90 kgmol × 2 (from equ. 3.3)
= 33.90 kgmol
H2O going out of reactor = 57.90 kgmol + 33.90 kgmol = 91.86 kgmol
3
S8 produced = 8 × 16.90 kgmol (from equ. 3.3)
= 6.36 kgmol
H2S 0.036 14.62
CO2 0.190 76.16
N2 0.511 205.20
SO2 0.018 7.27
1 th
38
H2O 0.228 91.86

S8 0.015 6.36
TOTAL 1.0 401.50

As in the previous case all of the produced sulfur is condensed through the condenser
and then withdrawn from the collecting pits.
H2S = 0.036 H2S =?
CO2 = 0.190 CO2 =?
N2 = 0.511 N2 =?
SO2 = 0.018 SO2 =?
H2O = 0.228 H2O =?
S8 = 0.015
Flow Rate = ?
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111
Fig 3.5: Material balance across condenser E-102

6.36 kgmol
0.999
H2O going in Stream-08 = 91.86 kgmol – 0.006 kgmol = 91.85 kgmol
S8 0.999 6.37
H2O 0.001 0.0067
TOTAL 1.0 6.38
39
H2S 0.037 14.62
CO2 0.192 76.16
N2 0.520 205.20
SO2 0.018 7.27
H2O 0.232 91.86
TOTAL 1.0 395.12
Again there is no need for the application of material balance calculations around the
heat exchanger E-103. So the Stream-09 has the same composition as that of Stream-08.
H2S 0.037 14.62
CO2 0.192 76.16
N2 0.520 205.20
SO2 0.018 7.27
H2O 0.232 91.86
TOTAL 1.0 395.12
H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.192
N2 = 0.520
Flow Rate = ?
SO2 = 0.018
H2S =?
H2O = 0.232
CO2 =?
N2 =?
SO2 =?
H2O =?
S8 =?
Fig 3.6: Material balance across reactor R-101
40
Now, according to the specifications of the Claus process, the reactor R-101 converts
only 80% of the incoming sulfur dioxide into elemental sulfur.1 Thus:
= 11.64 kgmol
= 11.64 kgmol
3
= 2.18 kgmol
H2S 0.007 2.98
CO2 0.194 76.16
N2 0.524 205.20
SO2 0.003 1.45
H2O 0.264 103.50
S8 0.005 2.18
TOTAL 1.0 391.48

As in the previous case all of the produced sulfur is condensed through the condenser
and then withdrawn from the collecting pits.
1 th
41
H2S = 0.007 H2S =?
CO2 = 0.194 CO2 =?
N2 = 0.524 N2 =?
SO2 = 0.003 SO2 =?
H2O = 0.264 H2O =?
S8 = 0.005
Flow Rate = ?
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111

2.18 kgmol
0.999
H2O going in Stream-11 = 103.50 kgmol – 0.002 kgmol
= 103.48 kgmol
S8 0.999 2.18
H2O 0.001 0.002
TOTAL 1.0 2.20
H2S 0.037 2.98
CO2 0.192 76.16
N2 0.520 205.20
SO2 0.018 1.45
H2O 0.232 103.48
TOTAL 1.0 389.30
42
Again there is no need for the application of material balance calculations around the
heat exchanger E-105. So the Stream-12 has the same composition as that of Stream-11.
H2S 0.037 2.98
CO2 0.192 76.16
N2 0.520 205.20
SO2 0.018 1.45
H2O 0.232 103.48
TOTAL 1.0 389.30
H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.192
Flow Rate = ?
N2 = 0.520
H2S =?
SO2 = 0.018
CO2 =?
H2O = 0.232
N2 =?
SO2 =?
H2O =?
S8 =?
Fig 3.8: Material balance across reactor R-102
Now, according to the specifications of the Claus process, the reactor R-102 converts
only 95% of the incoming sulfur dioxide into elemental sulfur.1 Thus:
= 2.76 kgmol
1 th
43
= 2.76 kgmol
3
= 0.51 kgmol
H2S 0.0005 0.21
CO2 0.120 76.16
N2 0.528 205.20
SO2 0.0001 0.072
H2O 0.273 106.27
S8 0.001 0.51
TOTAL 1.0 388.43

As in the previous cases all of the produced sulfur is condensed through the
condenser and then withdrawn from the collecting pits.
H2S = 0.005 H2S =?
CO2 = 0.120 CO2 =?
N2 = 0.528 N2 =?
SO2 = 0.0001 SO2 =?
H2O = 0.273 H2O =?
S8 = 0.001 Flow Rate = ?
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111
44
0.51 kgmol
0.999
H2O going in Stream-14 = 106.27 kgmol – 0.0005 kgmol
= 106.27 kgmol
Now the Stream-S24and Stream-14 compositions are as follows:
Component Mole fraction Flow rat-FS24 (kgmol/hr)
S8 0.999 0.51
H2O 0.001 0.0005
TOTAL 1.0 0.52
H2S 0.0005 0.21
CO2 0.196 76.16
N2 0.530 205.20
SO2 0.0001 0.072
H2O 0.274 106.27
TOTAL 1.0 387.91
3.11 Final Calculations
Total S8 produced from SRU = S8 withdrawn from condenser E-100 + S8

withdrawn from condenser E-102 + S8
withdrawn from condenser E-104 + S8
withdrawn from condenser E-106
= 3.90 kgmol + 6.37 kgmol + 2.18 kgmol +
0.51 kgmol
= 12.99 kgmol = 80 tons/day
45
Chapter 4
ENERGY BALANCE OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
(SRU)
4.1 Introduction
T
he energy balance across the proposed sulfur recovery unit (SRU) is done by the
conservation equation of energy, as is done conventionally. A system must be
defined to account for the streams entering and leaving. In our case the obvious
selection is the sulfur recovery unit (SRU) itself while all the other premises are
considered surroundings. Some preliminary bases are to be specified for the
sake of convenience in the calculations. Following specifications are taken to meet the
above mentioned situation:
 Time of operation: 1 hr
 Ambient temperature: 25oC
 Ambient pressure: 1 atm
Now the energy balance calculations are made by using the following equation for the
law of conservation of energy:
Amount of energy Amount of energy Amount of energy
entering the system - leaving the system + generated within the -
through the boundaries through the boundaries system boundaries
Amount of energy Amount of energy
consumed within the = accumulated within the (4.1)
system boundaries system boundaries
Furthermore, all the enthalpies of the streams are calculated by the following relation:
Q = Σ (mCp) ∆T (4.2)
Energy Balance of the SRU Chapter 4
Whereas:
Q = amount of heat contained by the stream (kJ/hr)
m = molar flow rate of the stream (kgmol/hr)
Cp = Heat capacity of the stream (kJ/kgmol-oC)

∆T = Temperature of the stream (oC)
The chemical reactions taking place in the process are:
Main Reactions1:
1- H2S + 3/2O2 SO2 + H2O (4.3)
(∆H = -4147.20 kJ/kgmol)
2- SO2 + 2H2S 3/8S8 + 2H2O (4.4)
(∆H = -1165.60 kJ/kgmol)
Side Reactions:
3- CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O (4.5)
(∆H = -891.0 kJ/kgmol)
4- C2H6 + 7/2O2 2CO2 + 2H2O (4.6)
(∆H = -1560.0 kJ/kgmol)
5- C3H8 + 5O2 3CO2 + 4H2O (4.7)
(∆H = -2220.0 kJ/kgmol)
NOTE: In all the diagrams the compositions are mentioned in mole fraction basis
4.2 Overall Energy Balance
1
All heat of reaction data is taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_process
47

Flow Rate = 13 kgmol/hr
o
Temp. = 215.6 C o
Temp. = 124.4 C
H2S = 0.523
S8 = 0.999
CO2 = 0.376
H2O = 0.001
CH4 = 0.004
H2O = 0.010
C2H6 = 0.0008
o
Temp. = 70 C
C3H8 = 0.0001
O2 = 0.210
N2 = 0.790
Fig 4.1: Overall energy balance across SRU
Stream-01 H2S CO2 CH4 H2O C2H6 C3H8 Total

m (kgmol/hr) 104.03 74.83 0.95 18.80 0.16 0.02 198.80
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 35.65 41.29 40.35 34.50 64.44 92.91 -
∆T (oC) 190.6 190.6 190.6 190.6 190.6 190.6 -
Q01 (kJ/hr) 706872 588902 7306 123623 1965 354 1429098
Stream-02 O2 N2 Total
m (kgmol/hr) 54.54 205.20 259.70
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 29.49 29.30 -
∆T (oC) 45.0 45.0 -
Q02 (kJ/hr) 72377 270556 342940
4.3 Energy Balance across Furnace F-100

Flow Rate = 198.80 kgmol/hr Flow Rate = 416.0 kgmol/hr
Temp. = 215.6 C
o Temp. =? Fig 4.2: Energy
H2S = 0.116
balance across
H2S = 0.523
furnace F-100
CO2 = 0.376 CO2 = 0.183
CH4 = 0.004 N2 = 0.50
H2O = 0.010 SO2 = 0.058

C2H6 = 0.0008 H2O = 0.140
o
Temp. = 70 C
C3H8 = 0.0001 S8 = 0.010
O2 = 0.210
48
N2 = 0.790
Enthalpy of Stream-01 = 1429098.75 kJ/hr
Enthalpy of Stream-02 = 342939.52 kJ/hr

Heat of reactions of all
reactions taking place = (-4147.20 - 1165.60 - 891.0 - 1560.0 - 2220.0) kJ/hr = -9983.80 kJ/hr
in the furnace
Total amount of enthalpy = (1429098.75 + 342939.52 - 9983.80) kJ/hr = 1762054.47 kJ/hr
within the furnace
Now we calculate the output temperature of the Stream-03 using equ. 4.1:
Q = Σ (mCp) ∆T
1762054.47 kJ/hr = 416.0 kgmol/hr × Cp × (Tout-25 oC)
By iteration, the outlet temperature comes out to be 1177 oC (2150 oF)
Stream-03 H2S CO2 N2 SO2 H2O S8 Total

m (kgmol/hr) 48.58 76.16 205.20 24.25 58.0 3.90 416.0
Cp (kJ/kgmol-
o 51.19 58.36 34.26 57.01 45.69 655.20 -
C)
∆T (oC) 1152.0 1152.0 1152.0 1152.0 1152.0 1152.0 -
Q03 (kJ/hr) 2864805 5120291 8098735 1592631 3052823 2943682 23672970
4.4 Energy Balance across Boiler B-100

o
Temp. = 1177 C
o
Temp. = 649 C
H2S = 0.116
H2S = 0.116
CO2 = 0.183
CO2 = 0.183
N2 = 0.50
N2 = 0.50
SO2 = 0.058
SO2 = 0.058
H2O = 0.140
H2O = 0.140
S8 = 0.010
S8 = 0.010
Fig 4.3: Energy balance across boiler B-100
49
The waste heat recovery boiler extracts such an amount of energy from the stream-03 that
the outlet temperature of the stream leaving the boiler; stream-04, becomes equal to 649
o
C (1200 oF).

m (kgmol/hr) 48.58 76.16 205.20 24.25 58.0 3.90 416.0
Cp (kJ/kgmol-
o 44.77 52.72 32.24 53.89 40.43 165.50 -
C)
∆T (oC) 624.0 624.0 624.0 624.0 624.0 624.0 -
Q04 (kJ/hr) 1357154 2505456 4128164 815463 1463242 402760 10672242
Stream-S21 S8 H2O Total

m (kgmol/hr) 3.90 0.004 3.904
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 33.75 79.20 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 -
QS21 (kJ/hr) 13083 31.4 13115
o o
Temp. = 649 C Temp. = 124.4 C
H2S = 0.116 H2S = 0.117
CO2 = 0.183 CO2 = 0.184
N2 = 0.50 N2 = 0.50
SO2 = 0.058 SO2 = 0.058
H2O = 0.140 H2O = 0.140

S8 = 0.010
o
Temp. = 124.4 C
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111
Fig 4.4: Energy balance across condenser E-100
The condenser E-100 reduces the temperature of the stream-04 from 649 oC (1200 oF) to
124.4 C (256 oF) which is the dew point temperature of rhombic sulfur.
Stream-05 H2S CO2 N2 SO2 H2O Total

m (kgmol/hr) 48.58 76.16 205.20 24.25 57.90 412.0
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 35.37 40.69 29.56 42.89 79.20 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 -
Q05 (kJ/hr) 170796 308035 602931 103384 455816 1640964
50
4.6 Energy Balance across Heat Exchanger E-101

o o
Temp. = 124.4 C Temp. = 248.8 C
H2S = 0.117 H2S = 0.117
CO2 = 0.184 CO2 = 0.184
N2 = 0.50 N2 = 0.50
SO2 = 0.058 SO2 = 0.058
H2O = 0.140 H2O = 0.140
Fig 4.5: Energy balance across heat exchanger E-100
The heater heats the incoming stream-05 from 124.4 oC (256 oF) to 248.8 oC (480 oF) which
is the required temperature of the first reactor R-100.

m (kgmol/hr) 48.58 76.16 205.20 24.25 57.90 412.0
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 37.27 44.07 30.20 46.67 35.43 -
∆T (oC) 223.8 223.8 223.8 223.8 223.8 -
Q06 (kJ/hr) 405207 751156 1386897 253285 459102 3255648
o Temp. =?
Temp. = 248.8 C
H2S = 0.117 H2S = 0.036
CO2 = 0.184 CO2 = 0.190
N2 = 0.50 N2 = 0.511
SO2 = 0.058 SO2 = 0.018
H2O = 0.140 H2O = 0.228
S8 = 0.015
Fig 4.6: Energy balance across reactor R-100
Enthalpy of Stream-06 = 3255648 kJ/hr
51
Heat of reaction taking = -1165.60 kJ/hr
place in the reactor
Total amount of enthalpy = 3255648 kJ/hr – 1165.60 kJ/hr = 3254482 kJ/hr
within the furnace
Q = Σ (mCp) ∆T
3254482 kJ/hr = 401.50 kgmol/hr × Cp × (Tout-25 oC)
By iteration, the outlet temperature comes out to be 354.4 oC (670 oF)

m (kgmol/hr) 14.62 76.16 205.20 7.27 91.86 6.36 401.50
Cp (kJ/kgmol-
o 39.14 46.63 30.72 49.20 36.61 60.32 -
C)
∆T (oC) 329.4 329.4 329.4 329.4 329.4 329.4 -
Q07 (kJ/hr) 188491 1169811 2076453 117821 1107770 126370 4786717

o
Temp. = 354.4 C
o
Temp. = 124.4 C
H2S = 0.036
H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.190
CO2 = 0.192
N2 = 0.511
N2 = 0.520
SO2 = 0.018
SO2 = 0.018
H2O = 0.228
H2O = 0.232
S8 = 0.015 Flow Rate = 6.38 kgmol/hr
o
Temp. = 124.4 C
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111
52

m (kgmol/hr) 6.37 0.0067 6.38
o
Cp (kJ/kgmol- C) 33.75 79.20 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 -
QS22 (kJ/hr) 21370 52.7 21422
m (kgmol/hr) 14.62 76.16 205.20 7.27 91.86 395.12
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 35.37 40.69 29.56 42.89 79.20 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 -
Q08 (kJ/hr) 51400 308035 602931 30994 723166 1716528
o o
Temp. = 124.4 C Temp. = 204.4 C
H2S = 0.037 H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.192 CO2 = 0.192
N2 = 0.520 N2 = 0.520
SO2 = 0.018 SO2 = 0.018
H2O = 0.232 H2O = 0.232
is the required temperature of the second reactor R-101.

m (kgmol/hr) 14.62 76.16 205.20 7.27 91.86 395.12
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 36.45 42.91 29.97 45.52 35.0 -
∆T (oC) 179.4 179.4 179.4 179.4 179.4 -
Q09 (kJ/hr) 95602 586284 1103282 59369 576789 2421325
53

o
Temp. = 204.4 C Temp. =?
H2S = 0.037 H2S = 0.007
CO2 = 0.192 CO2 = 0.194
N2 = 0.520 N2 = 0.524
SO2 = 0.018 SO2 = 0.003
H2O = 0.232 H2O = 0.264
S8 = 0.005
within the furnace
Q = Σ (mCp) ∆T

m (kgmol/hr) 2.98 76.16 205.20 1.45 103.50 2.18 391.48
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 37.18 43.93 30.17 46.52 35.38 44.48 -
∆T (oC) 218.3 218.3 218.3 218.3 218.3 218.3 -
Q10 (kJ/hr) 24187 730368 1351470 14725 799377 21167 2941295
54
o o
Temp. = 243.3 C Temp. = 124.4 C
H2S = 0.007 H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.194 CO2 = 0.192
N2 = 0.524 N2 = 0.520
SO2 = 0.003 SO2 = 0.018
H2O = 0.264 H2O = 0.232
S8 = 0.005
o
Temp. = 124.4 C
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111

m (kgmol/hr) 2.18 0.002 2.20
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 33.75 79.20 -
o
∆T ( C) 99.4 99.4 -
QS23 (kJ/hr) 7313 15.7 7329
m (kgmol/hr) 2.98 76.16 205.20 1.45 103.48 389.30
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 35.37 40.69 29.56 42.89 79.20 -
o
∆T ( C) 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 -
Q11 (kJ/hr) 10477 308035 602931 6181 814644 1742270

o o
Temp. = 124.4 C Temp. = 196.6 C
H2S = 0.037 H2S = 0.037
CO2 = 0.192 CO2 = 0.192
N2 = 0.520 N2 = 0.520
SO2 = 0.018 SO2 = 0.018
H2O = 0.232 H2O = 0.232
55
is the required temperature of the third reactor R-102.

m (kgmol/hr) 2.98 76.16 205.20 1.45 103.48 389.30
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 36.42 42.70 29.93 45.19 34.92 -
∆T (oC) 171.6 171.6 171.6 171.6 171.6 -
Q12 (kJ/hr) 18624 558049 1053904 11244 620080 2261902
o Temp. =?
Temp. = 196.6 C
H2S = 0.037 H2S = 0.007
CO2 = 0.192 CO2 = 0.194
N2 = 0.520 N2 = 0.524
SO2 = 0.018 SO2 = 0.003
H2O = 0.232 H2O = 0.264
S8 = 0.005
within the furnace
Q = Σ (mCp) ∆T
56

m (kgmol/hr) 0.21 76.16 205.20 0.072 106.27 0.51 388.43
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 36.59 42.99 29.98 45.50 35.02 40.70 -
∆T (oC) 182.2 182.2 182.2 182.2 182.2 182.2 -
Q13 (kJ/hr) 1400 596544 1120875 597 678071 3782 2401270

o o
Temp. = 207.2 C Temp. = 124.4 C
H2S = 0.007 H2S = 0.0005
CO2 = 0.194 CO2 = 0.196
N2 = 0.524 N2 = 0.530
SO2 = 0.003 Flow Rate = 0.52 kgmol/hr SO2 = 0.0001
H2O = 0.264 o H2O = 0.274

Temp. = 124.4 C
S8 = 0.005
S8 = 0.999
H2O = 0.111

m (kgmol/hr) 0.51 0.0005 0.52
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 33.75 79.20 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 -
QS24 (kJ/hr) 1711 4 1714.8

m (kgmol/hr) 0.21 76.16 205.20 0.072 106.27 387.91
Cp (kJ/kgmol-oC) 35.37 40.69 29.56 42.89 79.2 -
∆T (oC) 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4 -
Q14 (kJ/hr) 738 308035 602931 307 836608 1748621
57
Chapter 5
EQUIPMENTS DESIGN
5.1 Design of Reaction Furnace (F-100)
o
o Temp. = 1177 C
Temp. = 215.6 C
H2S = 0.523 H2S = 0.116
CO2 = 0.376 CO2 = 0.183
CH4 = 0.004 N2 = 0.500
H2O = 0.010 SO2 = 0.058
C2H6 = 0.0008 H2O = 0.140
C3H8 = 0.0001 S8 = 0.010

o
Temp. = 70 C
Pressure = 101300 Pa
O2 = 0.210
N2 = 0.790
Fig 5.1: Material and energy flow across furnace F-100
Here the equipment called muffle furnace is actually a plug flow reactor provided
with refractory linings to avoid material damage on account of liberation of high exothermic
heats of reaction and combustion. In this thermal reactor we treat acid gas with air to
produce sulfur dioxide which then reacts in the Claus three stage reactors to produce
elemental sulfur. As we are oxidizing or burning hydrogen sulfide in the presence of air, the
reaction will be highly exothermic, thus liberating high heat contents, so we named it a
furnace. Design is totally on reactor based calculations.
The basic design steps included are (keeping in mind that due to absence of kinetic
data the reactor has to be designed based upon the concept of residence time):
STEP-1: Estimation of Residence Time (τ)
STEP-2: Calculation of Volumetric Flow Rate (u)

Equipments Design Chapter 5
STEP-3: Calculation of Volume of Reactor (V)
STEP-4: Calculation of Length of Reactor (L)
STEP-5: Selection of Refractory Material
STEP-6: Calculation of Internal Diameter of the Reactor (Di)
STEP-7: Calculation of Thickness of Reactor (t)
STEP-8: Calculation of Outer Diameter (Do)
STEP-9: Calculation of the Volume of Steel Required (Vs)
STEP-10: Calculation of the Mass of Steel Required (ms)
STEP-11: Calculation of Pressure Drop (ΔP)
The assumptions taken before coming to the actual design are:
• Plug flow.
• Steady state.
• Constant density
• Constant tube diameter.
• No mixing in the axial direction.
• Complete mixing in the radial direction.
• A uniform velocity profile across the radius.
STEP-1: Estimation of Residence Time (τ)

Volume of reactor (V)
Residence time (T) =
Volumetric flow rate (u)
Or Volume of Reactor (V) = Residence time (T) × Volumetric flow rate (u) (5.1)
The residence time is actually based upon the results obtained from the information and
calculations of the kinetics of the reactions involved. Since kinetic data is not available we
have to take help from literature. The residence time is taken as 2.5 seconds.1
Residence time (T) = 2.5 s
1 th
Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, Volume-1, 7 Edition by Robert H. Perry, Don Green
59
STEP-2: Calculation of Volumetric Flow Rate (u)
For the calculation of volumetric flow rate we proceed as:
uo - ui
ε= (5.2)
ui
Whereas:
ε = Expansivity (dimensionless)
uo = Outlet volumetric flow rate (m3/hr)
ui = Inlet volumetric flow rate (m3/hr)
Now:
Inlet mass feed flow rate (mi)
Inlet volumetric flow rate (ui) = (5.3)
Density of the inlet stream (ρi)
Inlet mass feed flow rate (mi) = Mass flow rate of stream-01 + Mass flow rate of stream-02
For the calculation of the mass flow rate of both streams we must know the average
molecular weight of both the streams.
Stream-01 composition:
Molecular weight
Component Mole fraction (kg/kgmol)
H2S 0.523 34.0
CO2 0.376 44.0
CH4 0.004 16.0
H2O 0.010 18.0
C2H6 0.0008 30.0
C3H8 0.0001 44.0
Average molecular Weight of stream-01 = (0.523 × 34.0) + (0.376 × 44.0) + (0.004 × 16.0) + (0.010
× 18.0) + (0.0008 × 30.0) + (0.0001 × 44.0)
= 34.60 kg/kgmol
Similarly:
Stream-02 composition:
Molecular weight
Component Mole fraction (kg/kgmol)
O2 0.210 32.0
N2 0.790 28.0
60
Average molecular Weight of stream-02 = (0.210 × 32.0) + (0.790 × 28.0)
= 28.84 kg/kgmol
Now:
198.80 kgmol 34.60 kg
Mass flow rate of stream-01 =
hr 1 kgmol
= 6878.50 kg/hr
259.70 kgmol 28.84 kg

Mass flow rate of stream-02 =
hr 1 kgmol
= 7490.0 kg/hr
Inlet mass feed flow rate (mi) = 6878.50 kg/hr + 7490.0 kg/hr = 14368.50 kg/hr
Now we are to calculate the density of the inlet stream (Di).
We know that the general equation of gas is given by the following relation:
PV = nRT
Whereas:
P = Pressure of the gas (atm) = 1 atm
V = Volume of the gas (dm3)
n = no. of moles of the gas (kgmol)
R = Universal gas constant (atm-dm3/ K-kgmol) = 0.0821 atm-dm3/ K-kgmol
T = Temperature of the gas (K) = 416.2 K
Or:
M
PV = RT
M.W
Whereas:
M = Mass of the gas (kg)
M.W = Molecular weight of the gas (kg/kgmol)
61
M P × M.W
=ρi =
V RT
For the calculation of molecular weight of the gas we proceed as follows:
The composition of the stream formed after the mixing of stream-01 and stream-02 is as
follows:
Mixed stream composition:

Flow rate Mole Molecular Weight
Component
(kgmol/hr) Fraction (kg/kgmol)
H2S 104.03 0.226 34.0
CO2 74.83 0.163 44.0
CH4 0.95 0.002 16.0
H2O 18.8 0.041 18.0
C2H6 0.16 0.0003 30.0
C3H8 0.02 0.00004 44.0
O2 54.54 0.119 32.0
N2 205.2 0.447 28.0
Molecular weight of the mixed stream = (0.226 × 34.0) + (0.163 × 44.0) + (0.002 × 16.0) +
(0.041 × 18.0) + (0.0003 × 30.0) + (0.00004 × 44.0)
+ (0.119 × 32.0) + (0.447 × 28.0)
= 32.10 kg/kgmol
Now:
1 × 32.10
ρi = = 0.94 kg/m3
0.0821 × 416.2
Now from equ. 5.3:
14368.50 kg/hr
Inlet volumetric flow rate (ui) = = 15285.60 m3/hr
0.94 kg/m3
Now we must calculate the outlet volumetric flow rate (u o) of stream-03:

Outlet mass feed flow rate (mo)
Outlet volumetric flow rate (uo) =
Density of the inlet stream (ρo)
(8.4)
62
For the calculation of the mass flow rate of outlet stream we must know the average
molecular weight of this stream.
Molecular Weight
Component Mole fraction
(kg/kgmol)
H2S 0.116 34.0
CO2 0.183 44.0
N2 0.493 28.0
SO2 0.058 24.25
H2O 0.140 18.0
S8 0.010 256.0
Average molecular weight of the stream-03 = (0.116 × 34.0) + (0.183 × 44.0) + (0.493 ×
28.0) + (0.058 × 24.25) + (0.140 × 18.0) +
(0.010× 256.0)
= 32.28 kg/kgmol
Mass flow rate of stream-03 (mo) = 416.0 kgmol 32.28 kg

hr 1 kgmol
= 13428.48 kg/hr
Now we are to calculate the density of the outlet stream (Do).

P × M.W
ρo =
RT
1 × 32.28
ρo = = 0.271 kg/m3
0.0821 × 1450
Now from equ. 5.4:
13428.48 kg/hr
Outlet volumetric flow rate (uo) = = 49551.50 m3/hr
0.271 kg/m3
Now from equ. 5.2:
49551.50 - 15285.60
ε= = 2.24
15285 .60
Now the volumetric flow rate is given by:
63
u = ui (1 + εXa) (5.5)
u = 14368.50 (1 + 2.24 × 0.44) = 4.8 m3/s
STEP-3: Calculation of Volume of Reactor (V)
The volume of the reactor is calculated by the equ. 5.1:
V = 2.5 s × 4.8 m3/s = 12.0 m3
Volume of the reactor (V) = 12.0 m3
STEP-4: Calculation of Length of Reactor (L)
For high rate of mixing and for reaction completion we take small length to diameter ratio
as:
L / Di = 3.375
Whereas:
L = Length of the reactor (m)
Di = Internal diameter of the reactor (m)
L = 3.375 Di
As for the cylindrical shell, the volume is given by:

π
V = ( ) Di2L
4
π
V = ( ) Di2 (3.375 Di)
4
π
V = 3.375 ( ) Di3
4
So:
3 4V
Di = = 1.65 m
π×3.375
And:
L = 3.375 (1.65) = 5.58 m
Length of the reactor (L) = 5.58 m
64
STEP-5: Selection of Refractory Material
As the reactions taking place in the furnace F-100 are all exothermic and the
temperature within the furnace rises to 1177 OC (2150 OF), some kind of refractory material
is used to avoid the damage of the material of construction of the plug flow reactor on
account of high thermodynamic temperature. The refractory thickness is so adjusted that
the allowable temperature for shell material will be 354.5 OC (670 OF) because we have
suggested using the SA-516 material for the shell construction. By using 0.08 m (3.5 in)
refractory (Casto Last G; as it is more convenient for operating under high temperatures and
resistant towards sulfur and its products) the shell internal diameter is now increased.
STEP-6: Calculation of Internal Diameter of the Reactor (Di)
Di = 1.65 + 2 (0.08) = 1.81 m
Internal diameter of the reactor (Di) = 1.81 m
STEP-7: Calculation of Thickness of the Reactor (t)
 Design pressure (Pi) = 344.7 kPa (50 psi)

 O
Stress factor at 354.5 C for SA-516 (f) = 3.08 × 104 kPa (4475 psi)
 Corrosion allowance (Cc) = 3.17 × 10-3 (0.125 in)
 Joint efficiency (J) = 0.85
Now the thickness of the shell is given by:

Pi ×Di
t= + Cc
2f ×J
344.7 × 1.81
t= = 0.02 m
2(3.08 × 104) × 0.85
Thickness of the reactor (t) = 0.02 m
STEP-8: Calculation of Outer Diameter of the Reactor (Do)
Now the outer diameter (Do) is calculated by:
Do = Di + 2t
Do = 1.81 + 2 (0.02) = 1.85 m
Outer diameter of the reactor (Do) = 1.85 m
STEP-9: Calculation of the Volume of Steel Required (Vs)
Volume of the austenitic steel required is calculated by:

π
Vs = [Do2-Di2] × L = 1.38 m3
4
65
Volume of steel required (Vs) = 0.64 m3
STEP-10: Calculation of the Mass of Steel Required (ms)
 Specific gravity of steel = 7.84

 Density of steel = 7938.311 kg/m3
Now the mass of steel is calculated by:
Mass of steel = Density of steel × Volume of steel
Mass of steel = 7938.311 × 0.64 = 5080 kg
Mass of steel required = 5080 kg
STEP-11: Calculation of Pressure Drop (ΔP)
Pressure drop occurs only if there is a catalyst bed and is calculated by the Ergun equation.
Since no catalyst bed is not used over here so ΔP = 0, since a plug flow reactor operating
without any catalyst has 0 pressure drop.1
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF FURNACE (F-100)

IDENTIFICATION Plug Flow Reactor (provided with refractory lining)
NUMBER 1
FUNCTION Conversion of H2S into SO2
OPERATION Continues
TEMPERATURE 1177 OC
OPERATING PRESSURE 450.0 kPa
DESIGN PRESSURE 900.0 kPa
LENGTH 6.10 m
OUTER DIAMETER 1.85 m
MATERIAL OF CONSTRUCTION Austenitic Steel, ASTM Code: SA-516-17
CAPACITY 12.0 m3
MASS OF THE STEEL 5080 kg
REFRACTORY Fireclay
1
A. Kayoed Coker, “Modeling of chemical kinetics and reactor design”.
66
5.2 Design of Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (B-100)

o o
Temp. = 1177 C Temp. = 1177 C
H2S = 0.116 H2S = 0.116
CO2 = 0.183 CO2 = 0.183
N2 = 0.500 N2 = 0.500
H2O = 0.140 SO2 = 0.058
SO2 = 0.058 H2O = 0.140
S8 = 0.010 S8 = 0.010
Fig 5.2: Material and energy flow across waste heat recovery boiler B-100
The Design steps for the design calculations are as follows:
STEP-1: Calculation of Mass Flow Rate of Cooling Water (mB100)
STEP-2: Calculation of LMTD (ΔTLMTD)
STEP-3: Assuming a Value of Ud
STEP-4: Calculation of Total Heat Transfer Area (At)
STEP-5: Tube Specifications
STEP-6: Correction of Area (A)
STEP-7: Correction of Ud
STEP-8: Shell Side Heat Transfer Coefficient (ho) Calculations
STEP-9: Tube Side Heat Transfer Coefficient (hi and hi,o) Calculations
STEP-10: Overall Clean Heat Transfer Coefficient (Uc) Calculations
STEP-11: Calculation of Dirt Factor (Rd)
STEP-12: Calculation of Shell Side Pressure Drop (ΔPs)
STEP-13: Calculation of Tube Side Pressure Drop (ΔPT)
Now each design step is put into practical approach as follows:
67
STEP-1: Calculation of Mass Flow Rate of Cooling Water (mB100)
Mass flow rate of cooling water is already calculated in energy balance which comes out to
be equal to 3.24 x 103 kg/hr
STEP-2: Calculation of LMTD (ΔTLMTD)
Hot fluid (stream-03) inlet temperature = 1177 oC
Hot fluid (stream-03) outlet temperature = 649 oC
Cold fluid (cooling water) inlet temperature = 25 oC
Super heated steam outlet temperature = 440 oC
(ΔTLMTD)preheat = 585 oC
(ΔTLMTD)superheat = 659 oC
(ΔTLMTD)weighted = Qtotal
(Q/LMTD)preheat + (Q/LMTD)superheat
For Qpreheat and Qsuperheating we proceed as follows:
Qpreheat = mB100Cp (100-25) = 1.02 x 106 kJ/hr
Qsuperheating = mB100Cp (440-100) + λ = 9.30 x 106 kJ/hr
Qtotal = 1.03 x 107 kJ/hr
Whereas:
λ = latent heat of vaporization of water = 1.87 kJ/hr
Now:
(ΔTLMTD)weighted = 649 oC
• Range = 10 – 250 W/m2-K
• Selected Ud = 140 W/m2-K
(depending upon hot and cold fluid)
68
STEP-4: Calculation of Total Heat Transfer Area (At)
At = Q/(Ud x LMTD) = 31.4 m2
STEP-5: Tube Specifications
• Length:
 Commonly used = 3.6 m, 4.2 m, 4.8 m
 Selected length (L) = 3.6 m
• Tube Outside Diameter = 0.0254 m
• Pitch = 0.032 m (triangular)
• BWG = 16
• Wall thickness = 0.0016 m
• Tube inside diameter (da) = 0.022 m
• Flow area (at) = 0.00038 m2
Outside surface per linear ft = 0.079 m
• Area of one tube = π x OD x L = 0.28 m2
• No of tubes (NT):
 By formula = At / Area of one tube = 109
 Nearest count = 91
• Correspondingly shell inside diameter:
 0.38 m
 40% extra diameter for overdesign and vapors is added:
 New shell ID = 0.5 m
• Bundle diameter (db):
NT = at (db/da)2.29
db = 0.3 m
• Clearance (C) = Shell ID – db = 0.08 m
69
• Baffle spacing (B):
 Range = 0.2 to 1 times shell ID
 Calculated = 0.8 (0.38) = 0.3 m
 No. of baffles = Length of tubes = 12
Baffle spacing
STEP-6: Correction of Area (A)
A = Nt x (tube outside surface per linear ft) x (tube

length) = 25.90 m2
STEP-7: Correction of Ud
Ud = Q / (A x LMTD) = 170 W/m2-K
STEP-8: Shell Side Heat Transfer Coefficient (ho) Calculations
PREHEATING:
Reynolds No. (Re) = (G x De) / μ
For 0.0254 m tube OD and 0.032 m triangular pitch:
De = 0.02 m
Re = 191.0
jH = 7.0 2
ho = jH (k / De) (Cp /k)1/3 = 3706 W/m2-K
SUPERHEATING
Flow area (as) = (Shell ID x C x B) / Pt = 0.285 m2
Mass velocity (Gs) = mB100 / as = 11.3 x 103 kg/hr-m2.
Reynolds No. (Re) = 6532
jH = 42 2
ho = jH (k / De) (Cp /k)1/3 = 752 W/m2-K
70
STEP-9: Tube Side Heat Transfer Coefficient (hi and hi,o) Calculations
Flow area (aT) = 0.034 m2
Mass Velocity (Gt) = mt/aT = 4.4 x 105 kg/m2-hr
Reynolds No. (Re) = 2.05 x 104
jH = 90
k = 0.0084 W/m-K 2
hi = 0.023 (k/D) (DiGt/μ)0.8 (Cp μ/k)0.33 = 342.0 W/m2-K
hi,o = (hi x ID)/OD = 296.0 W/m2-K
STEP-10: Overall Clean Heat Transfer Coefficient (Uc) Calculations
PREHEATING
Up = (hi,o x ho,preheat)/(hi,o + ho,preheat) = 274.0 W/m2-K
Ap = clean area for preheating = Qpreheat / (Uc x ΔTp) = 1.76 m2
SUPERHEAT
Uv = (hi,o x ho,superheat) / (hi,o + ho,superheat) = 212 W/m2-K
Av = clean area for vaporization = Qsuperheat / (Uv x ΔTs) = 18.4 m2
Ac = total clean area = Ap + Av = 20.16 m2
Uc = [(Qp/ΔTp) + (Qv/ΔTv)] / Ac = 218 W/m2-K
STEP-11: Calculation of Dirt Factor (Rd)
Rd = (1/Ud) – (1/Uc )= 1.30 x 10-3 m2-K/W
STEP-12: Calculation of Shell Side Pressure Drop (ΔPs)
PREHEATING
Re = 191
f = 0.0048 1
71
Effective length of preheating zone (L’) = L( Ap/Ac) = 0.31 m
No. of crosses = 1 + No. of baffles = 13
ΔPs,preheat = [f x Gs2 x Ds x (N+1)]/(5.022 x 1010 x De x S x φs) = 16.0 kPa
SUPERHEATING
Re = 6532
f = 0.0022
ΔPs,superheat = [f x Gs2 x Ds x (N+1)]/(5.022 x 1010 x De x S x φs) = 29.0 kPa
ΔPs = Total shell side pressure drop = 45.0 kPa
Which is in the allowable limit i-e: 68.0 kPa
STEP-13: Calculation of Tube Side Pressure Drop (ΔPT)
Re = 2.04 x 104
f = 0.001
ΔPt = (f x Gt2 x n x L) / (5.22 x 1010 x Di x S x φ) = 18.0 kPa
ΔPr = Return pressure drop = (4n/S) x (v2/2gc)
v2/2gc = 2.92 kPa 2 (for Gt = 4.4 x 105)
ΔPr = 24 kPa
Total pressure drop on tube side (ΔPT) = 42.0 kPa; Which is in the allowable limit i-e: 68.0
kPa
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF BOILER (B-100)

UNIT Waste Heat Recovery Boiler
TYPE Fire Tube
OBJECTIVE Heat recovery from flue gases
LAYOUT Horizontal
NO OF UNITS 1
SHELL SIDE FLUID Water
TUBE SIDE FLUID Sour Gases
HEAT LOAD 1.03 10 7 kJ/hr
MASS FLOW RATE ON SHELL SIDE 3.24 10 3 kgmol/hr
MASS FLOW RATE ON TUBE SIDE 416.0 kgmol/hr
INLET WATER TEMPERATURE 25 C
72
OUTLET WATER TEMPERATURE 440 C

INLET GASES TEMPERATURE 1177 C
OUTLET GASES TEMPERATURE 649 C
WEIGHTED LMTD 649 C
HEAT TRANSFER AREA 25,9 m2
INSIDE SHELL DIA 0.95 m
NO OF TUBES 91
INSIDE TUBE DIA 0.022 m
OUTSIDE TUBE DIA 0.0245 m
TUBE LENGTH 3.6 m
TUBE PITCH Triangular (0.032 m)
CLEARANCE 0.08 m
SHELL SIDE PRESSURE DROP 45 kPa
TUBE SIDE PRESSURE DROP 42 kPa
5.3 Design of Reactors (R-100, R-101, R-103)

REACTOR R-100:
o o
Temp. = 248.8 C Temp. = 354.4 C
H2S = 0.117 H2S = 0.036
CO2 = 0.184 CO2 = 0.196
H2O = 0.410 H2O = 0.228
SO2 = 0.058 SO2 = 0.018
N2 = 0.500 N2 = 0.511
S8 = 0.015
Fig 5.3: Material and energy flow across reactor R-100
Temp of entering of stream = 522 K

Pressure of entering stream = 1.4 atm
Flow rate of entering stream =412 kgmol/hr
CALC. OF AVG DENSITY:

Molar Density = P/RT (R=0.0802 atm-m3/kgmol-k)
= 1.4 / (0.0802)(522)
= 0.0327 kgmol/m3
73
Avg. density of stream (p) = 1.056 kg/m3
CALC OF VOL FLOWRATE:

Mass flow rate of entering stream = Molar flow rate of entering stream/density
= 3.697 kg/sec
Vol flow rate = m/p
v = 3.50 m3/sec
For the conversion of 70% and for the inlet temp of 500 K, space time comes to be 6 sec.
Space velocity would be sec = 600/hr
CALC OF BED VOLUME:

vB = vol. Flow rate/space velocity
vB = 21 m3
Void fraction for volume of catalyst bed is 0.4, so that vol. of bed is vB = (1+E)Vb
Total vol. Of catalyst bed = vB = 29.4m3
DIAMETER OF BED:
Now suppose L/D = 3
So diameter of bed can be calculated as;
DB = (4Vb/3*)1/3
= 2.32 m
LENGTH OF BED:
LB = 3D = 6.96m
Provide 10% free space over bed (top and bottoms for support of catalyst bed) so;
LENGTH OF REACTOR:
LB(1.1) = 7.656m
DIAMETER OF REACTOR:
As L/D = 3, so diameter of reactor = 2.552 m
Vol. OF REACTOR:
V = 39.14 m3
CALCULATION OF PRESSURE DROP:

Pressure drop in fixed bed reactor can be calculated
by using Ergun’s Equation which is given as follows:
∆P/L = {150є2µVs/(1- є)3Dp2 + 1.75 єpVs2/(1- є)3Dp}
Where
Є = Void Fraction
Vs = superficial gas velocity; Vs = v/AB
Dp= Diameter of catalyst pellet
L = Depth of catalyst bed
µ = Avg. Viscosity of gas stream
74
p = Avg. Density of gas stream

∆P = {150(0.4)2(0.023)(0.828)/(0.6)3(.003)2 + 1.75(0.4)(1.056)(0.828)2/(0.6)3(.003)}L
= {3674 + 766} (6.96)
= 13440 N/m2
So pressure drop comes to be comes to be almost .132 atm which is 8.40% of operating
pressure.
REACTOR WALL THICKNESS:

t = (PiDi)/(4fj – 1.2Pi) - Cc
Where
Pi = Design Pressure = 50 psig
Di = Diameter of reactor
f = Stress factor for SA-516-17 at 522K is 30845535 N/m2
j = joint efficiency is 0.85
Cc = Corrosion allowance is 2mm
t = 50(93.36)/{4(4475)(.125) - 1.2(50)}
= 0.05m
t = 0.05 m
VOLUME OF AUSTENITIC STEEL, ASTM CODE SA-516-17:

Do = Di + 2t
=2.65 m
Volume of steel = π (Do – Di)2L + 2(π/4)Do2t
= 1.506 m3
Density of steel = 6294Kg/m3
Mass of steel required = 9479 kg
CALCULATION OF Wt. OF CATALYST:

Catalyst used is activated Alumina (Al2O3) in form of spherical pellets.
Density of catalyst = 967 kg/m3
Weight of catalyst = vol. of catalyst x Density of catalyst
WEIGHT OF CATALYST = 28429 kg
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF REACTOR 100:
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF REATOR R-100

REACTOR CATAGORY Fixed Bed Reactor
CATALYST ACTIVATED ALUMINA (Spherical Columns)
MODE OF OPERATION Adiabatic Process
SPACE TIME 6sec
VOLUME OF CATALYST BED 29.4m3
75
VOID FRACTION 0.4

VOLUME OF REACTOR 39.14m3
REACTOR LENGTH 7.66m
REACTOR DIAMETER 2.55m
REACTOR PRESSURE DROP 13440N/M2
REACTOR WALL THICKNESS 0.05m
WEIGHT OF CATALYST 28429 kg
WEIGHT OF STEEL 9479 kg
REACTOR R-101:
Temp of entering of stream = 477 K

Flow rate of entering stream =395.12 kgmol/hr

Molar Density = P/RT (R=0.0802 atm-m3/kgmol-k)
=1.3/(0.0802)(477k)
=0.0332 kg-mol/m3
Avg. density of stream

p=1.073 kg/m3
Mass flow rate of entering stream

=(Molar flow rate of entering stream)(avg. Mol. Wt)
=3.55 kg/sec
Vol flow rate = m/p
V=3.30 m3/sec
For the conversion of 70% and for the inlet temp of 500k, space time comes to be 6sec.
Space velocity would be sec=600/hr
CALC OF BED VOLUME:

vB = vol. Flowrate/space velocity
vB = 19.8m3
Void fraction for volume of catalyst bed is 0.4, so that vol. Of bed is vB = (1+E)Vb
76
DIAMETER OF BED:
Now suppose L/D = 3
DB = (4Vb/3*)1/3
= 2.274m
LENGTH OF BED:
LB = 3D = 6.82m
Provide 10% free space over bed(top and bottoms for support of catalyst bed) so;
LENGTH OF REACTOR:
LB(1.1) = 7.50m
As L/D = 3, so diameter of reactor = 2.50m
Vol. OF REACTOR:
V = 36.86m3

Dynamic pressure drop across a granular bed can be estimated by means of Ergun’s
Equation. The equation is dimensionally consistant.
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF REACTOR R-101

REACTOR CATAGORY FIXED BED REACTOR
CATALYST ACTIVATED ALUMINA SPHERICAL PELLETS
MODE OF OPERATION ADIABATIC PROCESS
SPACE TIME 5sec
VOLUME OF CATALYST BED 27.9m3
VOID FRACTION 0.4
VOLUME OF REACTOR 35.64m3
REACTOR LENGTH 6.55m
REACTOR DIAMETER 2.43m
REACTOR PRESSURE DROP 11460N/m2
REACTOR WALL THICKNESS 0.05m
WEIGHT OF CATALYST 24792kg
REACTOR R-102:
Temp of entering of stream = 470K

Flow rate of entering stream =389.30 kg-mol/hr
77
Molar Density = P/RT (R=o.o802 atm-m3/kgmol-k)

=1.2/(0.0802)(470k)
=0.0318 kg-mol/m3
Avg. density of stream

p=1.03 kg/m3
Mass flow rate of entering stream

=(Molar flow rate of entering stream)(avg. Mol. Wt)
=3.49 kg/sec
Vol flow rate = m/p
V=3.38 m3/sec
For the conversion of 70% and for the inlet temp of 500k, space time comes to be 6sec.
Space velocity would be sec=600/hr
CALC OF BED VOLUME:

vB = vol. Flowrate/space velocity
vB = 20.33m3
Void fraction for volume of catalyst bed is 0.4, so that vol. Of bed is vB = (1+E)Vb
DIAMETER OF BED:
Now suppose L/D = 3
DB = (4Vb/3*)1/3
= 2.294m
LENGTH OF BED:
LB = 3D = 6.88m
Provide 10% free space over bed(top and bottoms for support of catalyst bed) so;
LENGTH OF REACTOR:
LB(1.1) = 7.57m
As L/D = 3, so diameter of reactor = 2.524m
Vol. OF REACTOR:
V = 37.86m3
78
Dynamic pressure drop across a granular bed can be estimated by means of Ergun’s
Equation. The equation is dimensionally consistent.
5.4 Design of Condenser (E-106)

Condenser E-106
Flow Rate= 387.91 kgmol/hr

Flow Rate= 391.48 kgmol/hr
o
o
Temp.= 124.4 C
Temp.= 243.3 C
H2S = 0.0005
H2S = 0.007
CO2 = 0.196
CO2 = 0.194
N2 = 0.530
N2 = 0.524
SO2 = 0.0001
SO2 = 0.003
H2O = 0.274
H2O = 0.264 Flow Rate= 0.52 kgmol/hr
S8 = 0.005 o
Temp.= 124.4 C
S8= 0.999
H2O= 0.111
Fig 5.4: Material and energy flow across condenser E-106

Following design steps are followed for the condenser E-106:
1) Calculation of Heat duty (From Energy Balance)

2) Calculation of LMTD
3) Assuming Overall Design Coefficient to find out estimated area
4) Assumption of tube length, tube ID etc.
5) Calculation of Reynolds Number(tube) and Tube-side heat transfer coefficient
6) Calculation of Reynolds Number(Shell side) and Shell-side heat transfer coefficient
7) Calculation of tube side and shell side Pressure drops
8) Iteration for best results.
Now each step is practically applied as:
1) Heat duty
Heat duty = 1,644,838 kJ/hr
79
= 1,559,010 Btu/hr (Process Gas)
2) LMTD
Process gas Inlet temperature = 470 °F
Process gas Outlet temperature = 256 °F
Inlet Temperature of Steam = 245 °F
Outlet Temperature of Steam = 289.5 °F
LMTD = (∆T1 - ∆T2)/ ln (∆T1/∆T2)
= 60.6 °F
LMTD Correction Factor = 0.9
∆ T= Corrected LMTD = 54.54 F
3) Overall Design Coefficient (UD)

For Gases as hot fluid and Water (steam) as cold fluid
UD = 26 Btu/ft2-oF (2-52) (Table #8 Kern)
4) Tube Side Specifications

(Iterated for best results)
OD = 1.25 inch = 0.104 ft
BWG =11
Thickness = 0.120 in = 0.01 ft
ID = 1.01 in = 0.0842 ft
Flow Area per Tube = s = 0.0055 ft2
Length of tube = 20 ft
Pitch = Triangular =1.25(do) =1.25 x 0.104
PT = 0.13 ft
80
Tube Side Calculations
As Area = π× do× L
Length of Tube = Area
π× do
= 1,099/ π× 0.104
= 3365 ft
Number of tubes = Total Length / Length of one Tube
= 3365/20
= 169
Nearest # of Tubes from literature = 170
Now, to find mass velocity in tubes
Gt =Mass flow rate / (Flow Area per total length of tube)
= 11,152/ (0.8611)
= 12,949 lb/ft2. hr
We find Tube side Reynolds Number
NRe = (inside diameter of tube ×mass velocity)/ viscosity
= Average Viscosity of gases = 0.0393 lb/ft. hr
81
NRe = Di x Gt / 
= 27,715
Finding Tube side heat transfer Coefficient
hc = 1.51 x [ 4 Ѓn /μL ] 0.33 [K2L ρ2L.g/μL]3
(Eq. 12.4 Kern)
Ѓn= Condensate Loading = W/ 0.5 L Nt (Condensation occurs over 8 ft)
ρL = Density of Liquid (condensate) = 1350 kg/ m3 = 84 lb/ft3
μL = Viscosity of Liquid (condensate) = 225.5 kg/m.sec = 151 lb/ft.sec
KL = Thermal Conductivity of Condensate = 0.146 J/m.sec
hc = 12.8243 Btu/ ft2. hr.F
5) Shell side Calculations
Inside Diameter of shell = 2.083 ft (Kern Pg.#842)
Baffle Spacing = 3.3 ft
Baffle thickness = Tube thickness×2.5
=0.025 ft
Tube Clearance = 0.333× Tube OD
= 0.333×0.105
= 0.0347 ft (Plant Design by Peters & Timmerhaus Pg.# 705)
Now, to find mass velocity in the shell-side
Flow Area for shell side = inside cross-sectional area of shell - outside cross sectional
82
Area of all tubes
(Cross-sectional area = π D2)
= π (2.083)2 – 169 (π x [0.105]2)
4 4
Flow Area for shell side = 2.122 ft2
Calculating equivalent Diameter of Shell
Heated Perimeter = 169 x π x OD
= 49.41 ft
Hydraulic Radius (rH) = free area/ heated perimeter
= 0.043 ft
Equivalent Diameter (De) = 4 x rH
= 0.17 ft
Mass Velocity = Mass Flowrate / Flow area
= 35,658 lb/hr. ft2
μ (viscosity) = 0.578 lb.hr/ft
No. of Baffles =Length of tube/ (baffle spacing + baffle thickness)
= 20/(3.3+0.025)
83
=6
Baffle Height = 0.75×internal shell diameter
= 0.75 x 2.083
= 1.56 ft
According to equation 14-30 of Plant Design by Peter; Timmerhaus
ho= jH x k/De x (CPµ/k)0.33(µ/µw)0.14
jH = 45 (fig. 28 D.Q.Kern)
De =Equivalent Diameter= 0.17 ft
Gs =Mass velocity of shell side = 35,658
CP = 0.4632 Btu/lb. F
µ = 0.578 lb.hr/ft
k = 0.0165 Btu/ hr. ft2 (F/ft) Table 5 Kern
ho= 11 Btu/ ft2.hr.F.
Now, we need to calculate Overall Design Coefficient to check our earlier assumption
As,
(1/Ud) = (1/ho) + (1/hi) (OD/ID) + xw/kμ (OD/ID + xw) 1/hdo +1/hdi (OD/ID)
(Eq. 11-2 Perry)
hdo = 500 (For Gas from Kern Table 12)
hdi = 1000 (For BFW from Kern Table 12)
xw = thickness of wall = 0.01 ft
k = thermal conductivity of condensate = 0.146 J/m.sec
84
Result comes out to be
Ud = 26.7 (assumption is valid)
6) Pressure Drop
Along Tube Side
ΔPi = 0.5( fi x Gi2 x L )/(5.22 x1010 x D x s x Фi) (D.Q. Kern)
fi = 0.0025 (Fig. 26 Kern)
Gi = Mass Velocity in tubes = 12,949 lb/ft2. hr
L = Length of tube= 20 ft
D = OD of tubes= 0.7476 ft
S= Specific gravity of gases= 0.00204
Putting these in above we get the Pressure Drop
ΔPi = 2.8 psi
Along Shell Side
ΔPs =ƒGs2Ds(N+1)/5.22 x105sDe
85
N+ 1 = 12 L /B = 60
Re = 12,051
ƒ = 0.003 ft2/in2
Ds = 2.083 ft
Gs = 35.658 lb/hr. ft2
De = 0.171 ft
Putting these values in above we get shell-side pressure drop
ΔPs = 3.5 psi
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF Condenser (E-106)
Type of Condenser In-tube (Shell and tube)
Shell passes 1
Tube Pattern Triangular
Tube passes 1
Heat Transfer Area 89.5 m2
Number of tubes 170
Type of Baffle Segmental 25% cut
Number of baffles 6
Inlet Temperature of Steam 118.3 °C
Outlet Temperature of Steam 143 °C
Inlet Temperature of organic mixture 243.3 °C
Outlet Temperature of Organic Mixture 124.4 °C
86
Pressure drop at shell side 24 kPa
Tube Side Pressure Drop 19 kPa
Tube side heat transfer coefficient 12.824 Btu/ ft2 F.hr
Shell side heat transfer coefficient(ho) 11 Btu/ ft2 F.hr
Overall heat transfer coefficient(Ud) 26.7 W/ m2-K
8.5 Design of Process Stream Heater (E-105)
Fig 8.5: Material and energy flow across process stream heater E-105
The purpose of the heater is to heat the incoming stream-11 from 124.4 C to 196.9 C as stream-
12. The overall design steps are as follows:
STEP-1: Calculation of Heat Duty.
STEP-2: Calculation of Mass Flow rate.
STEP-3: Assuming a Value of Ud.
87
STEP-4: LMTD Calculations.
STEP-5: Area Calculations.
STEP-6: Clean Coefficient Calculation Uc.
STEP-7: Correction of Ud.
STEP-8: Correction of Area.
STEP-9: Length Calculations.
STEP-10: Calculation of no. of Hairpins.
STEP-11: Calculation of Pressure Drop.
The inner pipe design steps which are to be used are:
• Inner Pipe Flow area
• Mass velocity
• Reynolds Number.
• Prandtl Number.
• Wall Temperature
• Wall Viscosity
• Determination of JH
• Calculation of Inside Heat transfer coefficient
• Pressure Drop Calculations
Similarly, the outer pipe design steps are:
• Annulus Flow area
• Mass velocity
• Equivalent Diameter
• Reynolds Number.
• Prandtl Number.
• Wall Temperature.
88
• Wall Viscosity.
• Determination of JH.
• Calculation of Outside Heat transfer coefficient.
• Pressure Drop Calculations.
The physical properties of the process stream and the steam used are summarized in the following
table for a quick and easy review:
Process Stream Steam
PROPERTY VALUE PROPERTY VALUE
Molecular weight 29.62 kg/kgmol Molecular weight 18.02 kg/kgmol
o o
Heat Capacity (Cp) 34.50 kJ/kgmol- C Heat Capacity (Cp) 40.06 kJ/kgmol- C
3 3
Molar Density 0.252 kgmol/m Molar Density 0.56 kgmol/m
Viscosity 0.73 kg/m-hr Viscosity 0.95 kg/m-hr
Thermal o Thermal o
0.1 kJ/hr-m- C 0.2 kJ/hr-m- C
Conductivity Conductivity
STEP-1: Calculation of Heat Duty (Q)
Q = mcCpc(t2 –t1)
= 9.6 x 105 kJ/hr
STEP-2: Calculation of Mass Flow Rate (mh)
mh = Q/λ
As:
Qh = Qc
= 30 kgmol/hr
Assuming: Ud = 140 J/s.K.m2
89
=504.0 KJ/hr.m2.oC (For Gases)
STEP-4: LMTD Calculations
LMTD= {∆T1 - ∆T2 }/ ln (∆T1/∆T2)
= 280oC
STEP-5: Area Calculations
Heat Transfer Area = Q/(Ud x LMTD) = 6.87 m2
OUTER PIPE DIMENSIONS.2
IPS = 2 in = 0.0508 m Effective length = 3.65m
Schedule no = 40 Di = 0.053 m
Do = 0.06 m Thickness =0 .007 m
INNER PIPE DIMENSIONS
IPS= 1.25 in = 0.031 m Effective length = 3.65
Schedule no = 40 di = 0.035 m
do = 0.042m Thickness = 0 .007m
Flow Area
Ai = π (Di )2 /4 = 9.6×10-4 m2
Mass Velocity
Gi = mi /Ai = 3.12 x 104 Kgmol/m2. hr
Reynolds's Number
Re = di Gi /µ = 2.0 x 104 (Flow regime is turbulent.)
Prandtl Number
2
D. Q. Kern, “Process Heat Transfer”. (pg 110), Table 11 (pg 844)
90
Pr = Cp µ/k = 10.5
Wall Temperature
∆T across Steam Film = 0.4 (440-160.5) = 111.8 oC
Wall Temp from Steam Side = 272.3 oC
Wall Viscosity
µw of Steam = 0.82 Kg/m.hr
Heat Transfer Coefficient
JHi = 70. 1
JHi = (hidi/ki) (Pr)-0.34 (µ /µ w)-0.14
hi = 91 kJ/hr-m2-oC
Flow Area
Ai = π (Di2 – do2 ) /4 = 8.2×10-4 m2
Mass Velocity
Go = mo/Ao = 47.5 x 104 Kgmol/m2-hr

Equivalent Diameter
Deq = 4rH = (Di2 – do2 )/do = 0.025 m
Reynolds's Number
Re = DeqGo/µ = 48 x 104 (Flow regime is turbulent)
Prandtl Number
Pr = Cpµ/k = 8.5
Wall Temperature
∆T across Process Stream Film = 0.5 (440-160.5)
= 139.8 oC
Wall Temperature from Gases side = 251 oC
91
Wall Viscosity
µw of Gases = 0.94 Kg/m-hr. 1
Heat Transfer Coefficient
JHo = 165. 2
JHo = (hoDeq/ko) (Pr)-0.34 (µ /µ w)-0.14
ho = 1275 kJ/hr-m2-oC
STEP-6: Clean Coefficient Calculation Uc
1/UC = 1/hi +Di [ ln(Do/Di)]/2KW+Di/ho Do
Uc = 51519 kJ /m2-hr-oC
STEP-7: Corrected Ud
Rd = 1/Ud – 1/Uc = 0.0004 m2-oC-hr/kJ
Corrected Ud = 402 kJ/m2-hr-oC
STEP-8: Corrected Area
Corrected Heat Transfer Area= Q/(Ud x LMTD) = 8.60 m2
STEP-9: Length Calculations
Length Required=A/(π x do) = 8.6/(3.14 x 0.042) = 65.0 m
STEP-10: Calculation of Hairpins Required
Number of hairpins = 10.66
So nearly:
Number of hairpins are 11
92
STEP-11: Pressure Drop Calculations
ANNULUS:
Re = 48 x 104
f = 0.0035 + 0.264 / (Re)0.42 = 0.00046
ΔPs = 4fGo2 L / 2g ρ2 Deq= 6690.2 m
As: V = Go/ρ=18.8 x 104 m/hr
ΔPr = (v2/2g) = 0.0074 m
ΔPt= (ΔPr + ΔPs) x ρ = (6690.2 + 0.0074) x 0.252 x 29.64 = 49971.0 kg/m2 = 49.9 KPa
INNER PIPE:
Friction Factor (f) = 0.0035 + 0.264 = 0.007
(Re)0.42
ΔPi = 4fGi2 L
2g ρ2 di
ΔP = 1.7 x 109/2.7 x 106 = 629.6 m
ΔPi = (ΔPi) x ρ = 629.6 x 0.56 x 18.02 = 6.3 kPa
SPECIFICATION SHEET OF HEATER (E-105)

Identification:
Item: Double pipe heat exchanger (E-105)
0 0
Function: To heat the process stream from 124.4 C to 196.6 C.
HEAT DUTY
5
Heat duty (Q) = 9.6 x 10 kJ/hr
2
A C = 8.6 m
2 0
Ud = 402 kJ/hr-m - C
Inner pipe side: Annulus side:
Fluid handled: Process gases
Fluid handled: Steam
Flow rate: 389.3 kgmol/hr
Flow rate: 30 kgmol/hr 0 0
0 0 Temperature: 124.4 C to 196.6 C
Temperature: 440 C to 440 C
Schedule number: 40
Schedule number: 40
IPS: 1.25 in = 0.031 m
Shell material: Carbon Graphite
0 Tube material: Low carbon Steel
Temperature limit: 500 C 0
Temperature limit: 0 - 230 C
Pressure drop : 6.3 kPa
Pressure drop: 49.9 kPa
93
Chapter 6
PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL
6.1 Introduction
W
ell-designed and properly applied instrumentation is required for efficient
and reliable SRU operation. An SRU with the best designed piping and
equipments cannot achieve its intended function without proper
instrumentation. Today, extremely good instrumentation is available, and
no plant should be limited by lack of proper instrumentation. However,
even with excellent equipment available, instrumentation must be available and must be
properly designed and installed. There will always be some residual H2S and SO2 in the SRU
area. Instruments must be protected from these corrosive components through purging and
sealing. Copper and brass components (tubing, valves, electrical connection, etc.) should
never be used in SRU's unless they are inside purged enclosure. Some key instrumentation
areas are discussed below.
6.2 General Discussion on Instrumentation of the SRU

Following is a brief discussion about various safety equipments installed in the SRU.
6.2.1 Feed Flow Measurement and Control

Proper feed flow measurement and control is critical to reliable efficient operation
of SRU. It is preferred to control the acid gas header and knockout drum pressure inside the
SRU battery limits with a flow controller on cascade control from the pressure controller.
The feed flow meters should be located upstream of the control valve. This insures constant
pressure on the flow meter and avoids the need for pressure compensation of the
measured flow. Conventional orifice plates or low-pressure drop venturi meters are
normally used.
6.2.2 Combustion Air Control

Control of combustion air feed to the SRU is the most critical for efficient, reliable
operation of the SRU. It is preferred to use a combustion air control system that is split into
two sections, a main air flow loop based on acid gas flow rate and a trim air flow loop based
on the gas tail analyzer. Air demand is calculated from the acid gas flows and used as a feed
forward ratio set point for the main air control loop. The main air loop supplies about 90%
of the total air to the burner. The trim air loop operates on feed back control from SO 2 in
the tail gas. The analyzer controller provides a remote set point signal to the trim air loop
Process Instrumentation & Control Chapter 6
based on the relationship 2SO2 - H2S = 0. When this relationship satisfied, the optimum
amount of combustion air is being supplied to the SRU. If the result is positive, too much air
is being fed and the rate should be reduced. Likewise, if the result is negative, too little air is
being fed and the rate should be increased. It is apparent that the tail gas analyzer must
work properly to achieve optimum air control with efficient, reliable operation. If the air
controls are off, inadequate impurity destruction with equipment plugging and/or
equipment corrosion may occur. The tail gas analyzer must be properly located, use proper
sampling (preferably supplied by the analyzer manufacturer), and be properly celebrated.
This requires correct initial design and regular maintenance.
6.2.3 Main Burner and Reaction Furnace

The burner and reaction furnace require a significant amount of instrumentation;
however, most is not directly associated with process control of the SRU but it used to
monitor the operation. A key to reliable operation of burner and furnace instrumentation is
to adequately purge each instrument nozzle even when the SRU is shut down. The process
gas contains elemental sulfur, which will condense and solidify if allowed to enter the cool
instrument nozzles. The temperature in the reaction furnace should be monitored. This is a
valuable tool to determine if conditions have changed and effected combustion. An optical
pyrometer is the best solution. The most critical burner instruments are the flame scanners.
If the flame scanners are unreliable, it can result in numerous unwarranted, nuisance shut
downs. SRU's require special flame scanners because the H2S flame provides weak
ultraviolet radiation. Depending on the burner, some scanners may work and others will
not. Reliable scanners operation requires proper installation which includes sighting,
grounding, calibration, etc.
6.2.4 Waste Heat Boiler

The level controls associated with the WHB are critical. High pressure boilers should
normally utilize more sophisticated three element level control which uses steam
production rate and boiler level to set the BFW flow control loop. The three-element
control system reacts quicker to changes in load on the boiler and allows the steam drum to
be smaller. WHB's also must have low level switches that will initiate an SRU shutdown.
Malfunctions in the level control/shutdown system can result in WHB tube failure and
major SRU downtime.
6.2.5 Sulfur Condensers

The only process control associated with sulfur condensers is generally simple level
control. There are no shutdown switches normally associated with sulfur condensers.
6.2.6 Reheaters
Most reheater types will utilize a slightly different control system. All reheaters will
employ a temperature control loop; the differences occur in the stream actually controlled.
95
Direct fired line burners require the most complicated controls and includes automatic
shutdowns associated with the firing controls.
6.2.7 Catalytic Reactors

Varying the reheater outlet temperature controls catalytic reactor inlet
temperature. There are no other controls associated with the reactors. The installation of
thermocouples to monitor bed temperatures, flow distribution, and catalyst activity is also
monitored.
6.2.8 Shutdown System

One of the primary improvements that can be made in many SRU's is the installation
of a reliable safety shutdown system. The purpose of the SRU shutdown system is to:
 Safely shutdown the SRU to protect personnel and/or equipment if critical

operating variables move outside the save operating range.
 Insure a safe, orderly start-up of the SRU.
Operation personnel tend to do whatever is necessary to keep the SRU on-line even
though it can often result in unsafe operating conditions if the system is properly designed,
width properly selected and installed equipment, and is properly maintained, and the
shutdown system can perform its intended function reliably without nuisance shutdowns.
The following items should initiate an SRU Shutdown in all SRU's:
1. One or more operator activated manual switches.

2. High level in amine acid gas knockout drum.
3. Low amine acid gas flow rate.
4. Low combustion air blower discharge pressure.
5. Low main combustion air flow.
6. Loss of main burner flame as detected by two of two flame Scanners.
7. Low waste heat boiler water level.
6.3 Instrumentation for Condensers

Level of boiling feed water in the condenser 1, 2 and 3 is measured by a FEEDBACK
Control system. Similarly the pressure of steam exiting from the condenser is kept at 45 psig
using a FEEDBACK control system.
CONDENSER 4
Temperature of exiting acid gas stream from the final condenser is controlled by
BFW and the temperature of BFW entering the final condenser is controlled by 45 psig
steam at temperature of 289 F. Two feedback control system do both the duties.
96
CONDESNER 1-2-3
Level of boiling feed water in the condenser 1, 2 and 3 is measured by a FEEDBACK

Control system. Similarly the pressure of steam exiting from the condenser is kept at 45 psig
using a FEEDBACK control system.
97
Chapter 7
MECHANICAL DESIGN
7.1 Introduction
The corrosion problems can be minimized with proper metallurgy. In the SRU, we
will discuss the material of construction and lining of refractory for the most important
equipments. We will discuss these in the light of sulfide corrosion. Many types of
equipment in the SRU highly demand the refractory linings due to many reasons. One of
them is the high corrosion of the H2S and Sulfur. Another is to reduce the heat loss to the
surroundings. The material of construction and refractory linings for the equipments:
 Thermally Reaction Furnace

 Waste Heat Boiler
 The Claus Reactors
 Sulfur Condensers
 Sulfur Pits
 Thermally Reaction Furnace
The specific features and residence time required for an individual reaction furnace
are dependent on several factors including the operating temperature and expected feed
impurities.
The burner and furnace are typically constructed of carbon steel. The very severe
high temperature, reducing atmosphere process operating conditions in the burner and
furnace require protection of the carbon steel.
The carbon steel must be protected from acid corrosion (liquid phase H2O, SO2,
SO3) and high temperature sulfide corrosion by H2S. the primary form of protection is
insulating the steel from the processing atmosphere with a multi-layer refractory lining. The
refractory lining should be designed to maintain the inside metal temperature between
400-600 oF.
Mechanical Design Chapter 7
Experience has shown this temperature range to be adequate to avoid both

excessive acid and sulfide corrosion. The normal furnace operating temperature is 1800-
2000 oF; however, the hot face material must be capable of withstanding temperature of
2500-3000 degree F which can occur during start-up firing of natural gas.
We feel all new SRU reaction furnace linings should utilize at least 90% alumina hot
face material. Brick linings are more durable than cast able or plastic ram materials. The
initial installation of brick many be slightly more expensive, but brick normally provides a
longer lining life and requires less maintenance. The brick used for the hot face should be
mullite-bonded material. The high alumina hot face brick is very dense, has good high
temperature strength, but has poor insulating properties.
The second refractory layer should be low iron, class 2600 or 2800 insulating
firebrick (IFB). The IFB is a lower density, greater porosity brick than the hot faced high
alumina brick, and therefore, has better insulating properties. Insulating castable refractory
is also used as the backup layer to the hot-faced brick. If insulating castable is used, it is
important to insure the inner surface of the castable is perfectly round. Any out of
roundness makes installation of the outer brick layer more difficult and can result in an
uneven installation that may have voids between the layers.
If and IFB layer is used, the outer layer (layer next to the shell) is often a 1/8-1/4”
layer of ceramic fiber paper. This material has very good insulating properties. Often the
ceramic fiber paper provides more insulation that the two layers of brick.
The reaction furnace internal features mentioned above (choke ring, checker, wall,
etc.) must be incorporated into the refractory lining design.
Waste Heat Boiler
The WHB tube sheet and tube inlets have traditionally been protected using high
alumina ceramic tube ferrules/insert and approximately 4” of 60+% alumina castable
refractory on the tubesheet face between the ferrules.
Once installed, the castable is cured into a solid block containing the ferrules.
Properly curing the castable is often difficult. It is difficult to maintain the recommended
time-temperature profile by firing the SRU main burner and operations is normally being
pushed to get the SRU back on-line after a shutdown. Inadequate/improper curing generally
results in reduced WHB tubesheet refractory effectiveness and life.
The WHB tube sheet refractory has been an area of high maintenance, particularly is
SRU’s undergoing frequent start-up/shutdown cycles. It is difficult to properly support the
99
castable refractory. Movement in the tubesheet that takes place during cycling and flexing
of the tubesheet often cause cracking of ferrules and refractory. Once a crack develops, it
allows the hot process gases to reach the tubesheet and/or tube. High temperature sulfide
corrosion often occurs, eventually resulting in tube failure. Boiler feedwater (BFW) leakage
into the hot refractory lined reaction furnace causes additional damage. Very significant
SRU down time is required for retubing and refractory repairs.
For the tube sheets we prefer the austenitic stainless steel, which is more resistant
to the sulfur corrosion.
We the newer design thick hex-head ferrules for the WHB tube sheet are a
significant improvement. The hex-head design protects the tube sheet and the tube inlet in
one step. The hex-heads fit together to completely cover the timesheet in the tube field
area. Ceramic fiber paper is placed between the heads to fill any spaces between heads.
The hexhead ferrules can be installed much quicker that the conventional ferrules and
castable refractory. The individual ferules can move slightly as the tube sheet moves
without causing breakage/cracking. The only castable refractory is outside the tube field
near the outer edge of the tube sheet where it is easier to support and is less subject to
movement.
The Claus Reactors
Internal thick refractory lining including internal partitions below the top of the
catalyst bed to protect the shell from possible internal sulfur fires.
External insulation for heat conservation and the prevent corrosion of the vessel
shell. Catalyst support by refractory covered steel beams that support stainless steel or
Alonized steed grating covered with two layers of stainless steel screen. The lower screen
should be 4 x 4 mesh, and the upper screen 8 x 8 mesh. Both screens should be tied to the
grating using stainless steel wire.
Sulfur Condensers:
Care must be taken in choosing the most appropriate material of construction for the sulfur
condensers because of the acid gas is in contact with in the sulfur tubes. The most favorable
material of construction for the tube side is the typical austenitic stainless steel which
provides a best solution for reducing the corrosion.
The shell is usually insulated for reducing the heat loss to the surroundings.
Sulfur Pits:
Product sulfur is normally collected in a below grade, concrete pit equipped with steam
coils to keep the sulfur molten. The pit does not directly affect the SRU process operation
100
until the SRU must be shut down because of problems with the pit. Some common sulfur pit
problems are steam coil leakage, sulfur pumps failure, internal sulfur fires, and even
internal explosions. There are a few design features that will significantly improve the
reliable operation of the sulfur pit. Construct the pit using sulfate-resistant concrete with
limestone-free aggregate. Use piping for the steam coil steam coil steam supply down
comers and condensate risers, and any internal components such as ladder rungs that will
be alternately covered with liquid sulfur and then exposed to air as the pit level changes.
101
Chapter 8
HAZOP STUDY OF THE SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT (SRU)
8.1 Introduction
The objective of overall plant safety is to provide safety, health and care to all the
manpower working in the plant and to provide maintenance and safety to the plant by
reducing risks of accident.
8.2 General Safety Rules

1. Goggles or face shield, gloves will be worn every time a corrosive liquid is
sampled or when there is danger of coming in contact with a corrosive liquid.
2. A constant lookout for any condition that would prove hazardous to personnel or
equipment should be kept.
3. High-pressure leaks should be reported immediately.
4. Fresh air mask or breathing apparatus should be worn by anyone entering a
hazardous atmosphere. Hazardous environment could include sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen sulfide or sulfur vapors.
5. If any chemical spill occurs, clean the area of any source of ignition and wash
down the area slowly with water to minimize vaporization.
6. Operators should be aware of location of emergency and safety equipment.
7. Operators should be aware of all the toxic, corrosive and flammable materials
used in the process.
8. Fire fighting equipment should not be tampered with.
9. Access to ladders, escapes, safety showers, eyewash stations and air mask
stations must be kept clear. Waste material and refuses must be kept in proper
locations where they will not cause fire.
10. If any safety equipment is not working properly, it should be reported and set
right.
11. No smoking is allowed in the plant or its vicinity.
8.3 Building and Process Equipment Safety

Any acceptable design must contain the minimization of building and equipment hazards
such as corrosion, fire explosion and hazards caused due to fumes and poisonous materials.
Special care should be given to the disposal of waste material. Elimination of process
HAZOP Study of the SRU Chapter 8
leakage and spillage hazards due to corrosion and other factors should be paid extra
attention.
8.3.1 Lights
Proper light arrangements should be made, to facilitate the movement and working
of personnel and minimizing the risk of tripping over pipes.
8.3.2 Electrical and Mechanical Hazards

Electrical and mechanical hazards should be minimized. Every machine should be
equipped with proper safety guards. Poor and faulty wiring, overloaded circuits, and
improperly loaded circuits should not be used.
8.3.3 Chemical Hazards

Special care should be given to avoid any exposure to sulfur dioxide and hydrogen
sulfide. Most reliable manuals for safety are chemical safety data sheet compiled by
manufacturing chemists association. These manuals discuss the safe handling of most
hazardous chemicals while also providing drawing, data tables and graphs.
8.3.4 Fire Prevention and Control

The term fire protection applies to that phase of process design which minimizes the
fire hazards inherent in the process. Fire control refers to control the production and
spreading of fire which has already been started. Minimum safe practices prescribed by
nationally recognized fire protection associations, engineering authorities and organizations
should be exercised.
8.3.5 Personnel Safety

Special equipment such as safety goggles, gloves, ear muffs etc. should be provided
to the personnel so they can enhance their performance in a safe and healthy environment.
8.4 Claus Process

In Claus process we treat acidic and corrosive gases so safety should be kept in mind.
Hugh temperature and liquid sulfur are the major concern for safety purposes. Special care
103
HAZOP Study of the SRU Chapter 8
should be given to avoid any exposure to Sulfur Dioxide, Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur. High
pressure steam is also an important factor for safety consideration.
8.4.1 Special Hazards and Precautions

1. Sulfur dust explosion occurs with very rapid discharge of flame and pressure
waves. When confined to a building, pressure waves can cause a great deal of
damage.
2. Sulfur reacts violently with strong oxidizing agents such as nitrates and chlorates.
It will undergo chemical change at moderate rates with alkalis.
3. Ground sulfur is usually non-toxic through skin contact, ingestion and inhalation.
However, it can irritate the skin and eyes as well as the respiratory system.
4. Sulfur deposited on skin can be washed away with mild soap and water. Eyes
that have come into contact with sulfur dust are to be flooded with water for at
least 15 minutes.
5. Incipient fires in sulfur storage piles can be frequently smothered by gently
shoveling more sulfur, sand or fine earth to exclude all air. For larger fires, water
applied as fine mist is the most useful agent. High pressure water sprays disperse
the dust into air and should not be used.
6. Steam or noble gases are excellent gases for use in containers that can be closed
tightly. Care should be taken that the sulfur dust is not scattered into the air.
7. Gas masks approved for acid gases would not provide adequate protection in a
serious sulfur fire.
8. Spills should be handled according to the physical state of sulfur:
Molten - Burn danger, containment of spill
Solid – fire and explosion danger
Flowable – less dangerous, containment of spill.
9. Protective Equipment should be used during the following procedures.
- Manufacture or formation of product.
- Repair and maintenance of contaminated equipment.
- Clean up of leaks and spills.
- Any situation resulting in hazardous exposure.
104
Chapter 9
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & COST ESTIMATION
9.1 Introduction
A capital investment is required for any industrial process and determination of the
necessary investment is an important part of a Plant Design Project in cost analysis of an
industrial process, Capital investment costs, manufacturing costs and general expenses
including income taxes are taken into consideration.
9.2 Fixed and Working Capital

Fixed capital is the total cost of the plant ready for startup. It includes the cost of:
1. Design and engineering and construction supervision.

2. All items of equipment and their installation.
3. All piping, instrumentation and control system.
4. Building and structure.
5. Auxiliary facilities, such as utilities, land and civil engineering work.
Working capital is the additional investment needed, over and above the fixed
capital, to start the plant up and operate it to the point when income is earned.
It includes the cost of:
1. Start up.
Economic Analysis & Cost Estimation Chapter 9
1. Raw material investment.

2. Finished product investment.
3. Funds to cover outstanding accounts from customers.
Most of the working capital is recovered at the end of the project.
The total investment needed for a project is the sum of the fixed and working capital.
9.3 Total Product Cost

Another equally important part is the estimation of costs for operating the plant
and selling the products.
It is generally divided into following categories:
9.3.1 Manufacturing Cost

It includes
 Direct production cost:
Raw materials, operating labor, maintenance, steam, fuel, water etc.
 Fixed charges:
Depreciations, taxes etc.
 Plant Over Head Costs:
Medical, safety and protection, recreation etc.
9.3.2 General Expenses

It includes
 Administrative expenses.
106
 Marketing expenses.
 R & D.
 Financing.
Total capital investment is estimated on the basis of purchase equipment cost. Cost
data given in the “Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers” by Max .S .Peter and
Klaus D. Timberhead, & Chemical Engineering. Vol. 6 by J.M Coulson & J.F Richardson.
The value of Marshall & Swift Equipment cost index are given as
Marshall & Swift cost index value, January 1998 = 1070
Marshall & Swift cost index value, January 2004 = 1218
The present cost purchased of the equipment is calculated as follows:
 index.value.at. present.time 
Present cost = original cost *  
 index.value.at.original .time 
9.4 Equipment Cost

Muffle furnace (F-100)
Mass of austenitic steel used for the shell = 8572 1bm
Mass used for heads = 20% = 0.2 * 8572 = 1714.4 1bm
For man holes and supporting = 15% = 1285.8 1bm
107
Mass used for vessel = 11572.2 lbm = 5.26 ton
Austenitic steel cost = 3700 £ / ton
Refractory cost = 30% = 0.3 * 19462 = 5838.6 £
Total furnace cost = 25300.6 £
Boiler (B-100)
Boiler cost can be given as
Ce = CSN (from volume 6)
Cost constant = C = 60 £
Cost index = n = 0.8
Size parameter = S = 5727.27 kg /hr stream
Purchased equipment cost (1998) = Ce = 60884.87
Cost of boiler = cost (1998)  
= (60884.87)(1218/1070)
= 69306.33 £
Reactor (R-100, R-101, R-102)
Ce = C S “
C = 9300 &
n = 0.40
S = 31.63 cu m
108
Cost of reactor = cost (1998)  
= (37028.07) (1218/1070)
= 42149.7 £
Refractory cost = 30% = 0.3 * 42149.7
= 12644.9 £
Catalyst cost = 50 = 0.5 * 42149.7
= 21074.85 £
Cost of one reactor = 75869.45 £
There are three units so
Reactor cost (R–100, R-101, R-102) = 3* 75869.45
= 227608.35 £
Condenser E-106
Given as
Purchased cost = bare cost * type factor * pressure factor heat transfer area =
125.799 sq m
From fig vol 6
Bare cost = 68* 1000=68000 £
Type factor = 0.8
Pressure factor = 1
109
Purchased cost = 54400 £
Cost of condenser (C-d) = cost (1998)  
 index.value.at.original .time. 
= 54400 (1218 / 1070)
= 61924.5 £
As the heat duty of condenser E-100, E-102, E-104 and E-106 is more, we take 10% more
heat transfer area for the cost calculations, so
Heat transfer area for one condenser = 137 sq m
Bare cost = 70 * 1000 = 70000 £
Type factor = 1.3
Pressure factor = 1
Purchased cost = 91000
Cost of one condenser = cost (1998)  
 index.value.original .time 
= 91000 (1218/1070)
= 103586 £
Cost of three condensers = 3* 103586 = 310760.75 £
Total cost = 694900.53 £
For others equipment like pre heaters, knock out drums and other minor, we take factor
20% of the estimated equipments
Total cost = 1.20* 694900.53 = 833880.63 £
110
Total purchased equipment cost = 833880.63 £
Now using ratio factors for estimating capital investment items based on delivered
equipment cost as given in plant design and economics for chemical engineers book.
111
Components % age of purchased equipment Cost (&)

Total purchased cost (E) 100%E
Purchased equipment (installation) 47%E
Instrumentation (installed) 18%E
Piping (installed) 66%E
Electrical (installed) 11%E
Buildings (including services) 18%E
Yard improvement 10%E
Service facilities 70%E
Land 6%E
Total direct plant cost (D) 2885227.02
Engineering & supervision 33%E 275180.61
Construction expenses 41%E 341891.06
Total direct and indirect cost (D+I) 3502298.687
Contractors fee 5% (D+I) 175114.93

Contingency 10% (D+I) 350229.87
Fixed capital investment (F) 4027643.486
Working capital investment 15% F 604146.523
Total capital investment 4631790.01
Total capital investment required = 4631790.01 £
= 495601531 Rs.
112
REFERENCES
1. R.E. Kirk & D.E. Othmer; “Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology”,

Vol-11
2. Katz, D.L; Vary, J.A; “Hand Book of Natural Gas Engineering”; Mc

Graw Hill Co; Inc., 1959.
3. Private Communication, Robert J. Huston, Chairman Air Permits

Division, Texas Natural Resource Conversion Division, Sulfur Recovery Units,
P.O Box 13087 Austin TX 78711-3087
4. Journal, “Assessment of Recovery Capabilities, 2004” By J.F

Strickland, Michael Quinlan, D. Velasquez, Kellogg Brown & Root Houston,
Texas & Dennis Leppin Howard Meyer GTI Chicago, Illinois
5. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, February

2000
6. Claus-Plant Combustor Survey, November 2001 By Dan Banks, P.E.

Banks Engineering Inc. Tulsa, Oklahoma
7. “Improving Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit Reliability Through

Engineering Design” By Steve Fenderson, Goar, Allison, & Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 131390 Tyler, Texas 75713 September 15-18, 1998
8. Perry’s Chemicals Engineers’ Handbook, Vol. 1 & 2, 7 th Edition by
Robert H. Perry, Don Green
9. Kern D.Q. “Process Heat Transfer”, McGraw Hill Bool Co., New York,
1950
10. McCabe, W.L & Smith, J.C., “Unit Operation for Chemical
Engineering”, 6th Edition McGraw Hill Book Co., New York
11. Peters, M.S. & Timmerhause, K.D., “Plant Design & Economics or
Chemical Engineers” 2nd Edition McGraw Hill Book Co., New York
12. “Sulfur Recovery.” GPSA Engineering Data Book vol. II, eleventh
edition, 1998. Chapter 22
13. C. Rueter, “CrystaSulf® Process Fills Mid-size Niche for Sulfur

Recovery in Multiple Applications,” Gas TIPS Winter 2002, p.7-12
14. S. Lynn et al, “New Approach to Sulfur Removal Could Reduce

Costs,” Gas TIPS winter 2002, p. 13-20
15. J. Strickland and D. Velazquez, “Assessment of Recovery Capabilities

and Costs of Tail Gas Clean-Up Processes,” GRI Topical Report, February
2000, Unpublished.
16. L. Connock, “Enhanced Sulfur Recovery,” Sulfur, May-June 2003,

No. 286

Sample ABC

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sample ABC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

August 2009

UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND

Muhammad Omer Farooqi

Jahanzaib Ali Bugti

Ali Shan Malik

Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed Prof. Dr. A. R. Saleemi

(Project Advisor) (Chairman)

Our parents, whose

We are indebted to our chairman, Prof. Dr. A. R. Saleemi who

We acknowledge our indebtedness to our beloved project adviser

A general debt of gratitude is due to all the teachers of the

We are also thankful to the non-teaching staff of the department

We extend special thanks to our sweet parents for their unlimited

Problem Statement (1)

1.2 Processing Natural Gas

1.3.2 Amine Solutions used in Sweetening

1.3.3 The Girdler Process

1.4 About Sulfur

1.4.2 Processing of Sulfur

1.4.3 Uses of Sulfur

1.4.4 Products of Sulfur

1.5 Sulfur Recovery Methods

1.5.2 Large (greater than 25.0 LTPD)

1.5.3 Explanation of Various Processes

1.5.3.1 Sulfa Treat Direct Oxidation Process

1.5.3.2 The Claus Process

1.5.3.4 Selective Oxidation Process

1.5.3.5 Cold Bed Adsorption Process

1.5.3.6 Thermal Cracking of H2S

1.6 The Claus Process

1.6.3 Simplified Process Description

1.6.4 Process Improvements

1.6.5 Claus Process Auxiliaries

1.6.5.1 Blow Down System

1.6.5.2 Fuel System

2.2 Reaction Furnace (F-100)

2.3 Waste Heat Boiler (B-100)

2.4 Sulfur Condensers (E-100, E-102, E-104, E-106)

2.5 Heaters (E-101, E-103, E-105)

2.5.2 Hot Gas Bypass

2.5.3 Acid Gas Fired Line Burner

2.6 Catalytic Reactors (R-100, R-101, R-102)

2.7 Sulfur Pits

3.2 Overall Material Balance

3.3 Material Balance across Furnace F-100

3.4 Material Balance across Condenser E-100

3.5 Material Balance across Reactor R-100

3.6 Material Balance across Condenser E-102

3.7 Material Balance across Reactor R-101

3.8 Material Balance across Condenser E-104

3.9 Material Balance across Reactor R-102

3.10 Material Balance across Condenser E-106

3.11 Final Calculations

4.2 Overall Energy Balance

4.3 Energy Balance across Furnace F-100

4.4 Energy Balance across Boiler B-100

4.5 Energy Balance across Condenser E-100

4.6 Energy Balance across Heater E-101

4.7 Energy Balance across Reactor R-100

4.8 Energy Balance across Condenser E-102

4.9 Energy Balance across Heater E-103

4.11 Energy Balance across Condenser E-104

4.12 Energy Balance across Heater E-105

4.13 Energy Balance across Reactor R-102