KEY

WORDS CASE PETITIONER RESPONDENT RULING DOCTRINE

Bureau of
UNDUE Customs
DELEGATION Employees
Assoc. vs.
Teves
Metropolitan
PROBABLE Bank and
CAUSE Trust
-Estafa Company vs.
Tobias
RE: COA
opinion of the
Appraised
Value

TAX CREDIT *Claims it is entitled to recover *Prior payment of tax is required *Petition is GRANTED. *SOP (Courts cannot
359 M Php paid as output VAT as it is in the nature of transitional Nothing in Sec. 105 of limit the
-R.A. 7716 Fort Bon. Dev. for the 1st quarter of 1997. input tax. the NIRC indicates that application/coverage of
-RR-7-95 Corp vs. CIR *Assails that prior payment of *Pet. Are not entitled to prior payment is law nor it can impose
taxes in not required. transitional input tax credit bec. necessary to avail TICT. provisions not provided
no taxes were paid in the bec. to do so const.
acquisition of GC property. JUDICIAL LEGISLATION.

SSS *Violated RA 8282 for non- *Malum prohibitum *He was not granted to *Referral to the Chief
-R.A. 8282 (SSS Mendoza vs. remittance of SSS cont. to his *He was imposed of the penalty reverse the decision of Exec. for possible
Act) employees. of 4 yrs and 2 mos. of prission the Court although he exercise of Exec.
People *Admitted but he used good correctional. was able to avail the clemency.
-R.A. 9903
faith as a defense. waiver of accruement
(Withdrawal)
of penalties.
*Anomalies existed in light of *Arroyo took the Oath as Pres by *In the case at bar, it *It is within the
POLITICAL Estrada vs. petitioner’s position as Pres. reason of Estrada’s resignation does not involved boundary of the court
QUESTION w/c lead to the caused by the people power in political question. to decide the case.
Desierto commencement of EDSA II. EDSA.

Tanada vs.
Cuenco

Sanidad vs.
COMELEC

COCOFED
vs. Rep.
Hacienda
Luisita Inc. vs.
Luisita
Ind.Park Corp.

AKBAYAN
vs. Aquino

David vs.
Arroyo
Divingracia
vs.
Consolidated
Broad. Sys.
Comm. Of
Customs vs.
Hypermix

Robosa vs.
NLRC

US vs. Ang
Tang Ho

People vs.
Vera
Ynot vs. IAC

Pelaez vs.
Vera
Phil. Coconut
Producers Fed.
Inc. vs. RP