Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Truth About The Vaughan Williams Tuba Concerto
The Truth About The Vaughan Williams Tuba Concerto
Admittedly comments of this kind – and this was one of the less
spiteful – were of the type expressed in the words of Shakespeare,
“sharp-toothed unkindness.”
Needless to say, this did little to encourage feelings of confidence
in my ability to face up to the task of this “first” performance to
come. My further meeting with Vaughan Williams did reassure me
to the extent that I felt he was confident of my capability to rise to
the occasion, so I continued to working and in better spirit. The
composer did stress that he did not wish me to make suggestions
regarding the notation of the composition. He informed me that he
had suffered too much in this respect at the hands of Mr. Adler and
was not prepared to undergo such an affront on this occasion.
Matters regarding phrasing and fitting slurs, etc., were mutually
agreed upon. However, the composer did allow the deletion of the
two short high range phrases in the first movement cadenza,
consequently, they didn't appear in the first published piano
edition. It was conceded that they were not commercially viable
nor, at this first performance, in the instrumentalist's best interest.
Yet, he too was worried about them! Today's soloists are more
confident in this respect, and the notes have been re-inserted in the
new edition. In the matter of tempo; the steady, rugged rhythm of
the first movement was in the music's best interest. The tempo of
the finale was, and still is, questionable. I certainly didn't “spare
the horses,” but the composer indicated, after the first performance,
that it was a German waltz and at the recording session expressed a
feeling for a more steady tempo. But, at this session, Sir John
Barbirolli, as is often the way with conductors, appeared to ignore
his plea and proceeded to push the tempo and the soloist to the
limit. If one is to take Beethoven's Sonata in G, No. 25, Op. 79, the
first movement of which is marked “Presto alla Tedesca,” one can
quickly see that the Vaughan Williams “Allegro” marking might
have a bearing on the slightly slower tempo he probably preferred.
In any case, from what I have heard of other performers' playing,
the indicated tempo sounds uncomfortably rushed, even when their
technique is equal to its metronome mark.
The day for the preliminary rehearsal of the concerto was rapidly
approaching. I was having trouble with the timing of the first few
bars of the final movement. There is no significant pulse declared
in the first bar, and one is entirely at the mercy of the conductor.
It's difficult to see any kind of a beat when playing this movement
because one is standing or is seated in front of the conductor. A
violinist has a direct sighting, and most other instrumentalists are
similarly blessed, though cellists and vocalists have problems
comparable to those of the tubist. In this instance it is mainly a
case of guesswork in the hope that the conductor doesn't overdo
the tempo and that the triplet figures from the orchestra have a
relation to the pulse beat so that your entries are “spot on.”
My first and only rehearsal came the day prior to the concert. It
was a busy one for the orchestra. Two soloists, Handel-Harty
prologue and the Colour Symphony by Bliss. Dr. Vaughan
Williams was present, and he and Sir John Barbirolli duly had a
discussion – from which I was excluded! Eventually we had a run-
through. Some further discussion was followed by touching up of a
few orchestral problems. This ended my session, and my departure
was a signal for a tapping of stands on the part of my fellow
orchestra members.
I had played with the orchestra in the three previous Jubilee
concerts of that week, and the secretary had asked if I wanted to
participate as a member of the orchestra in the final concert in
addition to soloing. Feeling that I would have enough on my plate,
I requested that he arrange for a substitute tubist.
The day of the concert dawned, and at the morning rehearsal I had
a straight run-through of the concerto. In the evening I arrived
early at the Royal Festival Hall and was shown into one of the
artist's rooms. Here was everything necessary for the comfort of
the performer. Mr. T.H. Bean, the Festival Hall's general manager,
came in to inform me that the order of the program had been
changed, and that I would not be playing until after the
intermission. I accepted the news with the aplomb that is the
reaction of orchestral players in general to bad news. Even I had
thought a tuba concerto following a violin concerto (Elgar) a little
incongruous. But one rarely, if ever, questions the actions of
musical administrators. So I waited, waited and waited!
During the intermission, Mr. Bean once more came in with bad
news. Sir John was having “a bit of a party” in his room and the
break would be considerably longer than usual. It was stated that a
lot of toasting regarding the Jubilee would be taking place, and
there was plenty of the “necessary” available. So I sat, checked the
instrument, tried a few “toots,” walked around a bit, then sat down
and mentally and physically simmered. Eventually, Mr. Bean
arrived to take me into the conductor's room from whence I was
escorted to the stage in company with Sir John. We must have
looked a disparate pair, Sir John short and slight, myself a heavily
built six-footer carrying a well-polished tuba. However, nobody
laughed, though there was a murmur of conversation which I
prayerfully hoped did not signify anything approximating a hint of
ridicule.
Tuning was a problem. It appeared to me, in that hall, that I gave
out a sound similar to that of a sick cow. It seemed to meet the
approval of the conductor, and we were off. The first movement
was not too comfortable. A lack of togetherness on my part,
hopefully, was not noticeable to the audience. The cadenza came
off, though I wasn't too satisfied with my intonation. There is little,
if any, resonance in that hall, so your solo sound seems to stop at
the end of the bell. The beautiful second movement was, to me,
one of my best efforts. I didn't care if the audience, critics or
anyone else, for that matter, disliked the tuba sound or not. I really
enjoyed myself. The last movement rollicked along, musically
sketchy, but somehow held together with the confidence coming
from under-rehearsed orchestral players determined not to admit
musical defeat under any circumstances. The applause seemed
sincere enough; probably happy, along with me, that I had finally
made a tuba concerto sufficiently plausible musically to be
acceptable. Vaughan Williams came to the front of the stage and
linked hands with Sir John Barbirolli and myself, and we took our
bows of the audience.
Though the Colour Symphony by Sir Arthur Bliss (on this occasion
conducted by the composer) is not by any means a work lacking in
depth or length, it didn't seem long before relatives and friends
were in my dressing room. Included in their number was the
L.S.O.'s secretary, John Cruft, who, together with a representative
of His Master's Voice Recording Company, informed me that a
recording session was to be held the next morning, Monday, June
14. John informed me right away, “Don't accept an outright fee,
but request a percentage on sales.” This was, and certainly proved,
advantageous to me and was eventually agreed to by all parties.
It is felt a personal incident that occurred and which resulted in a
headline in our local paper, The Middlesex Gazette, should be
recorded in this account. Like the national dailies, it too had run an
explanatory column about the coming first performance, though
here emphasizing and approving the fact that I was a citizen of the
area. But following on the actual performance, the caption over my
picture on that issue read, “Wife Was 'Banned' From His Night of
Triumph.” In a reporter's presence I was called on to give the
reason for this, what he considered, inconsiderate treatment on my
part to deny my wife's presence on such an occasion. I found it
difficult to explain my reasons to her before the concert, let alone
now to the reporter. My explanation must sound irrational to you
today, but was a stern reality at the time. There was the belittling
image invariably linked to both the tuba and tubists. For example,
the cavalier assessment given by so-called experts: “Everyone puts
us down (musically) because we play the tuba.” Supposedly
humorous asides: “It's handy to throw things into.” Even a press
announcement of the concert referred to it as being: “...the novelty
of the evening...” Consequently, my reply to the reporter was to
this effect: “In the past, the tuba has been treated as a rather comic
instrument, and I did not know how the public would react. If I had
to suffer, I would rather suffer alone.” After all, musicians are
sensitive to the feelings of others, particularly those of their wives.
If she had been present and the reception other than it was, I would
have been that much more embarrassed for her sake.
The recording session planned for the 14th of June was soon over.
The composer and Sir John seemed happy, though I was not
particularly pleased. I had to play the cadenzas after everyone else
(yes, composer and conductor) left. A kind of musical “Amen” that
would be attached to the recording by an engineer seemingly as an
afterthought.
What followed? Well, I can imagine most of you have read some
of the write-ups and criticisms both of the concert and the
recording. As the record included Vaughan Williams' Oboe
Concerto played by Evelyn Rothwell (Lady Barbirolli) (HMV
BLP1078), I have no idea as to how many made up the first batch
or, for that matter, any further issues. However, the EMI company
made a tape to meet the requirements of some later interested
enthusiasts.
In 1979 The Barbirolli Society, by permission of EMI Records,
Limited, issued further recordings of Vaughan Williams' works
conducted by Sir John. One in particular, bearing the lettering and
numbers SJB 102, has the Tuba Concerto on side two. I am not
sure whether or not all of these recordings are available to the
general public, but it possibly is the case, as the one sent to me
bears the price tag of four pounds, fifty (about seven dollars). The
address to write to is Chairman: R. Pauline Pickering, 8 Tunnel
Road, Retford, Notts, DN22 7TA, United Kingdom. The date on
mine shows 26th February, 1980. Presumably such an L.P. record is
still available.At least the recording is of some historical interest,
and might be worth possessing, if for nothing else. All the
recordings are made with the London Symphony Orchestra,
vintage 1953-1955. The remarks on the record sleeve by Michael
Kennedy are worth noting.